The Wall Street Journal — 13.10.2026

100%
🔍

🧭 今日主编程控导读:聚焦「俄罗斯袭击乌克兰电力基础设施」、「作者:迈克尔·R·戈登 (Michael R. Gordon)、罗比·格拉默 (Robbie Gramer) 和 丹尼尔·迈克尔斯 (Daniel Michaels)」等核心政经议题

今日《The Wall Street Journal》全报共收录 177 篇核心报道。在政经治理、法理制度与公共政策层面,版面重心聚焦于:**俄罗斯袭击乌克兰电力基础设施**(作者:ANASTASIIA MALENKO);**作者:迈克尔·R·戈登 (Michael R. Gordon)、罗比·格拉默 (Robbie Gramer) 和 丹尼尔·迈克尔斯 (Daniel Michaels)**(亚历克斯·格林克维奇 (Alexus Grynkewich) 将军关于北大西洋公约组织 (NATO) “胜利理论”的演讲...);**普京无视能源“停火”协议**(俄罗斯与乌克兰之间的能源停火协议就这样化为泡影。特朗普总统周日在 Truth Social 上宣布了这项停战协议,并发出...)。 在本土文化与城市记忆方面,今日重点关注**「《绝命毒师》明星 RJ Mitte 逝世,享年 34 岁」**。

7000 亿美元
核心数据指标
34 岁
核心数据指标
54 岁
核心数据指标

🎭 本期时代思潮与社会文化雷达

🎭 当代文化观察

《The Wall Street Journal》本期社会思潮与时代切片

本期特写报道深入探索社会结构转型与文化心态变迁,详见【📖 双语精读】各专题深度报道。

🗂️ 全版面分栏导览目录 (点击标题直达正文)

📑 商业与金融

📑 特写

📑 经济

📑 国际

  • 委内瑞拉石油部门重建困境 The Wall Street Journal · 2 min

    马杜罗被推翻十个月后,委内瑞拉石油部门虽需数千亿美元投资,但实际流入资金寥寥无几。

📑 商业

📑 赞与弹

  • 西南航空新功能获赞 The Wall Street Journal · 2 min

    西南航空推出“我们将致电您”功能,通过快速回电解决客户问题,提升了用户体验。

  • 酒店前台服务机械化被谴责 The Wall Street Journal · 2 min

    部分酒店前台缺乏温暖问候且流程机械,被批评严重损害了入住体验。

📑 生活/环境

  • 房主应对极端天气准备建议 The Wall Street Journal · 2 min

    纽约大学研究员建议房主应针对气候风险采取预防措施,以应对日益严重的极端天气。

📑 体育

  • NFL球队因时间管理失误丢冠 The Wall Street Journal · 2 min

    费城老鹰队和华盛顿指挥官队在第5周比赛末段因主教练时间管理失误,分别被对手逆转或错失胜机。

📑 国际/政治

📑 市场数据/期货

  • 贵金属期货价格波动 The Wall Street Journal · 2 min

    10月黄金期货结算价为4165.80美元,较前一日下跌25.20美元。

📑 市场数据/ETF

  • 主要ETF表现分析 The Wall Street Journal · 2 min

    SPY(标普500 ETF)收盘778.10美元,微跌0.06%,但年初至今回报率为14.1%。

📑 市场数据/债券

  • 投资级利差变动情况 The Wall Street Journal · 2 min

    美国银行、佐治亚电力等发行人的投资级利差出现收窄,反映市场信用风险感知变化。

📑 市场数据/指数

📑 市场数据/股票

  • 成交量异动股监测 The Wall Street Journal · 2 min

    Bumble (BMBL) 成交量显著增加,收盘价3.80美元,单日上涨49.61%。

综合要闻 1

SCOTT APPLEWHITE / AP

ZUMA PRESS

华尔街日报

道琼斯

新闻集团

\* \* \* \* \*

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2026 ~ 第CCLXXXVIII卷 第88期

道琼斯工业平均指数 51850.55 ▲ 195.60 0.38%

纳斯达克 27245.90 ▼ 0.4%

欧洲斯托克600指数 635.65 ▲ 0.6%

10年期美债 收盘 (5.243%)

原油 $93.74 ▲ $1.89

美国版

黄金 $4,165.80 ▼ $25.20

欧元 1.1157

日元 158.63

要闻速递

商业与金融

◆ 美国主要股指收盘涨跌互现,标准普尔500指数和纳斯达克分别下跌0.06%和0.4%,道琼斯指数上涨0.4%。美国债券市场因哥伦布日假期而休市。A1

◆ 道奇队老板马克·沃尔特面临堆积如山的诉讼,原告是那些从其旗下保险公司购买年金产品的高龄群体。B1

◆ 一家在萨姆·班克曼-弗里德的加密货币帝国崩溃后看似已走入绝路的比特币挖矿企业,目前正被重启以服务于AI基础设施建设。B1

Meta平台公司发布了一款AI模型,其效用将通过在多大程度上提高留存率并加速公司Muse智能体的采用率来验证。B3

◆ 量子计算公司IonQ达成一项全股票交易,收购私有持有的Elisity公司,此次交易对这家网络安全公司的估值最高达 13 亿美元。B5

◆ 约会软件公司Bumble正处于私有化的高级谈判阶段,交易估值约为 10 亿美元。B4

♦ 大众汽车第三季度交付量下降,这家德国汽车制造商继续受到中国市场恶化的影响。B3

♦ 中国9月份的汽车销量未能报告回升,而9月传统上是旺季的开始。B3

◆ 在一份法律文件中,超市连锁店艾伯森超市要求其最大竞争对手克罗格超市在两年前其巨额合并交易破裂后,向其支付至少 80 亿美元。B1

全球动态

♦ 伊朗正在加强防御,集结忠诚者,并威胁将对美国及其海湾盟友采取更广泛、更严厉的反应,旨在为中期选举后美国可能发起的攻击做准备并试图对其产生威慑。A1

♦ 英国首相安迪·伯纳姆表示,一起涉嫌袭击英国境内美国运营的军事空军基地的阴谋“几乎肯定”是由伊朗革命卫队指使的。A6

♦ 北约最高军事指挥官通过概述该联盟挫败俄罗斯在其东翼潜在袭击的新计划,试图稳定焦虑的欧洲。A8

◆ 美国经济学家罗伯特·霍尔和迈克尔·伍德福德因在家庭和企业预期为经济稳定奠定基础方面的研究而获得诺贝尔经济学奖。A2

◆ 特朗普表示,在披露金伯利·吉尔福伊尔在确认听证会前要求一名捐赠者支付个人费用后,他正在考虑撤换这位驻希腊大使。A3

一份文件显示,在特朗普为新白宫舞厅及华盛顿周边遗产项目筹集的 3亿美元 资金中,其中一项占据了超过一半。A4

◆ 英国喜剧演员兼演员拉塞尔·布兰德出现在伦敦法院,开始接受强奸和性侵指控的审判。A6

联邦特工搜查国会议员住所

© 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

版权所有

突击搜查:周一,国土安全调查局官员在对众议员伊尔汗·奥马尔(民主党-明尼苏达州)的华盛顿住所进行搜查时搬运箱子,此次搜查被描述为刑事调查的一部分。奥马尔的办公室称其为“令人愤慨的权力滥用”。A3

◆ 逝世:RJ Mitte, 34, 《绝命毒师》演员。A2

期权交易狂热显示看涨投资者对风险的热忱

市场交易量飙升至每日 7000 亿美元——类似于模因股狂热时期

作者:KRYSTAL HUR 和 HANNAH ERIN LANG

如今,个人投资者并不让任何事情影响他们的情绪。

他们的狂热体现在对期权的疯狂交易中。期权是指允许持有者在特定日期前以设定价格买入或卖出股票的合约。据专门从事期权策略的投资经理 Carrick Lane 称,个股相关期权的交易量近期已达到 2021 年模因股狂热时期的水平,名义交易量约为每日 7000 亿美元。赋予买入权利的看涨期权价格已经超过了那个时期的水平。

新一代个人投资者在新冠疫情后的反弹中发现了市场,到 2021 年初,许多业余交易者开始尝试更复杂且通常风险更高的投注。股票期权和其他衍生品的繁荣随之而来。

这些市场现在再次因零售活动而沸腾,华尔街知道原因:个人投资者正忽略利率上升、100 美元的油价以及中东战争。他们专注于强劲的公司盈利,并且像当年 GameStop、Roaring Kitty 和 AMC Entertainment 成为 Reddit 论坛热门话题时一样,乐于在波动剧烈的市场中博运气。

根据美国个人投资者协会(American Association of Individual Investors)的最新调查,以预计未来六个月股价将上涨的投资者百分比来衡量,个人投资者的看涨情绪在截至 10 月 7 日的一周内达到了 40.3%。这是自 7 月中旬以来的最高水平,与 2021 年看到的水平相当。

许多人,比如 41 岁的 Ku-nal Berry,受到人工智能交易成功的鼓舞,并对该技术的潜能持乐观态度——请参阅 A2 页

◆ 街头之声:如何看待狭窄的反弹…… B10

在特朗普的威胁下,伊朗准备迎接更多战争

该政权深信美国已准备好发动袭击,正号召伊朗人团结,并加固核设施

作者:BENOIT FAUCON

伊朗正在加强防御,号召忠诚者,并威胁将对美国及其海湾盟友采取更广泛、更严厉的报复,以准备应对美国在期中选举后可能发动的袭击并试图威慑此类袭击。

伊朗官员在公开场合以及与地区官员的私下交谈中警告称,如果美国发动新一轮袭击,伊斯兰共和国将在整个中东地区采取进一步的升级行动予以回应。

卫星图像显示,伊朗正在加强包括核设施和边境地区在内的敏感地点的防御,以提高其抵御袭击的能力。政府还在让伊朗民众为重新陷入战争做准备,派遣准军事部队向幼儿园儿童朗读战争故事,宣传肩扛式防空导弹的训练,并举行集会。

伊朗几乎没有能力防御美国先进喷气式飞机、高空轰炸机或巡航导弹的袭击,这使其有动力尝试用威胁来威慑此类袭击。这种好战的基调也起到了转移注意力的作用,掩盖了随着美国收紧制裁并向航空公司施压使其停止飞往该国(从而加强封锁)而导致伊朗人经历的日益加深的经济苦难。

“由于许多战线陷入僵局,战争状态目前对他们有利——外交——请参阅 A6 页

FICO 受竞争对手崛起打击

FICO 信用评分长期以来在抵押贷款承销决策中发挥着关键作用。现在,监管机构和贷款机构已允许使用竞争对手 VantageScore。这一旨在打破 Fair Isaac 对抵押贷款市场垄断的举措,导致其股价今年下跌了约 60%。B1

福利支出飙升正令英国不堪重负

残疾津贴申请激增,但领导层难以实施削减

作者:MAX COLCHESTER 和 DAVID LUHNOW

英国利物浦——凯瑟琳·维兰德(Catherine Wieland)在 2021年被列入英国的福利领取名单。她告诉政府,由于有情感创伤史,她过于焦虑,无法出门,也无法完成洗澡等简单的日常任务。

不久,她每月领取约 £700, 或 $1,000, 的残疾津贴。而事实证明,她经常出门。

维兰德利用一项由纳税人资助的残疾人计划,支付了一小笔押金以免费使用一辆宝马车,她经常开这辆车去美发店、外出就餐、参加骄傲游行以及游览游乐园。根据她被判定欺诈的法院报告,她还飞往了墨西哥的坎昆。

维兰德的案例是英国一个新现实的极端例子:残疾津贴不再仅仅面向最需要的人群;在工资停滞、物价上涨的背景下,这些津贴已成为一部分人群的经济支柱。

这导致英国的福利账单爆炸式增长,令政治家们束手无策,并危及其长期的财务稳定性。

请参阅 A10 页

头等舱洗漱包现成“圣杯级”收藏品 \* \* \*

旅行爱好者积累了数十个免费洗漱包;“我爱其中的每一个”

作者:VICTORIA ALBERT

和大多数纽约人一样,安德鲁·林(Andrew Lim)的公寓空间不大。

这位电子商务专家在曼哈顿与丈夫合住一套狭小的单卧室公寓。但总能为一件心爱的财产留出空间。

他的收藏包括约 200 个航空公司洗漱包,即长途飞行中头等舱和商务舱免费提供的旅行装洗漱袋。林是一位旅行内容创作者,花费了数十年时间积累这些套装。在飞行超过 300 万 英里后,他的收藏中包括像联合航空(United Airlines)与《星球大战》合作的稀有款,以及中华航空(China Airlines)与 Marc Jacobs 合作的新款。

金卡身份

他将所有套装藏在壁橱里——避开丈夫的视线,因为他的丈夫对此并不感兴趣。但有时,他无法克制地将它们取出,以此追忆往昔。

“他觉得我疯了,”51 岁的林说道。

对于大多数乘客来说,洗漱包只是为了解决即使是商务舱旅行中也会遇到的烦恼:遮光眼罩用于遮蔽机舱光线;润唇膏和乳液用于缓解干燥空气;袜子则能带来更多舒适感。但对于极少数旅行爱好者来说,它们远不止于此:它们是纪念一次心仪旅程或收藏一段航空历史的方式。

狂热者会收集数十个甚至数百个洗漱包。他们将这些收藏品与……请参阅 412 页

请参阅 A12 页

目录

委内瑞拉对石油工业复兴充满希望

个人日志

个人日志

您的成年子女是否在疏远您?寻找关系破裂的早期迹象。A11

商业与金融

汤姆·克鲁斯曾追求奥斯卡最佳男主角奖。随后《挖掘者》('Digger')惨败。B1

作者:KEJAL VYAS

委内瑞拉,卡比马斯(CABIMAS)——100多年前发现的一口喷油井,在这座曾一度繁荣的马拉开波湖畔城市附近催生了委内瑞拉的能源工业。如今,卡比马斯成为了美国努力复兴该行业的中心。

这座拥有350,000人口的城市像是一个石油工业的坟场。极目远眺,可见扭曲的钻塔和坍塌的海上平台。从湖中拉起的渔网粘着凝固的原油块,天然气从破裂的水下管道中汩汩冒出。湖岸被石油染成了黑色。

在附近,孩子们在渗漏的抽油机之间打棒球,这些抽油机经常因为每天长达12小时的停电而停止工作。

这里的许多居民表示,他们迫不及待地希望美国投资者到来,并开始投入资金重建该国破旧的石油基础设施。许多人还记得当年的繁荣岁月,那时石油工人享有国际石油公司提供的住房,以及拥有游泳池、体育俱乐部和高尔夫球场的社区,以及水质洁净、海洋生物健康的湖泊。

他们提出的问题是:美国能让好时光回归吗?

“上帝保佑,外国人很快会回来,我们将拥有更好的生活质量,”五个孩子的父亲、渔民何塞·梅迪纳(José Medina)说道。但他担心这需要很长时间。“感觉我们既没有前进,也没有后退。”

这里衰败的工业反映了在已故总统雨果·查韦斯(Hugo Chávez)及其继任者尼古拉斯·马杜罗(Nicolás Maduro)统治下二十年的管理不善。美国在1月份的一次突袭中抓获了马杜罗,并正在纽约起诉其贩毒罪,马杜罗对此予以否认。行业高管和专家表示,居民的担忧是有根据的:复兴委内——

请翻至 A10 页

军费支出占 GDP 比重

资本账户 / 作者:Greg Ip

北欧的国防与增长计划

预计增长率,2026年

预计财政赤字或盈余占 GDP 的比例,2026年 $^{†}$

\*若剔除丹麦公司的海外生产,增长率约为 2%

†包括中央、州和地方政府。该指标为标准化衡量,可能与各国财政当局的数据有所不同。

来源:斯德哥尔摩国际和平研究所(军费支出);各国央行(预计增长率);经合组织(OECD)9月展望(财政赤字 / 盈余)

瑞典央行一直担心,如果发生如俄罗斯网络攻击导致电力或通信网络瘫痪等紧急情况,无现金消费者将如何应对。

因此,截至7月,瑞典消费者可以使用其万事达卡(Mastercard)和维萨卡(Visa)在没有网络连接的情况下购买必需品。央行(瑞典国家银行 Riksbank)希望进一步推进,使 Swish(一个完全绕过维萨和万事达网络的本地移动支付系统)也能实现离线购买。

“整个地缘政治局势带来的结果是,你的运营需要具备冗余能力,”瑞典国家银行行长埃里克·特德恩(Erik Thedéen)在一次采访中解释道。

“如果我们审视我们的支付系统,恰巧我们使用的两张信用卡都来自同一个国家,即美国,”他说。“我认为我们应该记住这一点。”

这一举措以其微小的方式表明,这个世界的这个角落发生了多么巨大的变化。在北欧国家——瑞典、丹麦、挪威、芬兰和冰岛——很少有国家能像它们那样从全球化和冷战结束中获益如此之多。

那个世界已经消失了。俄罗斯威胁其领土,中国威胁其市场,而且它们不再能指望美国来捍卫其中任何一项。对丹麦和瑞典的访问向我展示了它们如何转向应对这一现实:在国防方面投入更多资金和人力;解决支付系统、供应链和贸易关系中的脆弱性;并将各自的经济、国防工业和军队与彼此以及欧洲更紧密地整合在一起。

它们不仅没有为此付出代价,反而似乎在蓬勃发展,这对世界其他地区来说是一个令人鼓舞的信号。

在北约(NATO)成员国中,很少有国家像北欧国家那样,如此积极地响应特朗普总统要求它们承担更多自身国防开支的诉求。根据斯德哥尔摩国际和平研究所的数据,去年丹麦和挪威的国防支出占 GDP 的比例均高于美国。而十年前,它们的支出仅为现在的三分之一。瑞典和芬兰也紧随其后。

同样值得关注的是这种扩军背后达成的政治共识。在3月的丹麦选举和上个月的瑞典选举中,包括极右翼反移民政党在内的左右翼各党派均支持加强军事力量。

原因在于:俄罗斯在波罗的海对岸虎视眈眈。丹麦国防情报局得出结论,在乌克兰停火后,如果北约重新武装速度缓慢且美国不提供帮助,俄罗斯将在两年内准备好打击波罗的海国家,并在五年内有能力在欧洲发动大规模战争。

“人们知道这一点,所以他们知道为什么(重新武装)如此至关重要,”领导执政联盟的社会民主党议员弗莱明·莫勒·莫滕森(Flemming Moller Mortensen)表示。

心态的变化体现在更平凡的生活方式中。正如瑞典确保在电网瘫痪时支付卡仍能工作一样,丹麦已要求家庭储备三天的必需品,包括食物、水、药品以及一台太阳能或电池驱动的收音机。

年轻人面临着被征召入伍的前景。瑞典在

2018年,且今年将征召9,000名新兵,而2018年为3,500名。目前该国正在讨论是否取消禁止征召兵在瑞典境外服役的禁令。丹麦则已规定女性具备服役资格,并将征召兵的服役期从4个月延长至11个月。

特朗普对北约的承诺不温不火,且试图吞并由丹麦统治的格陵兰岛(该计划在上个月与丹麦达成的一项协议下被搁置),这让丹麦人和瑞典人意识到他们在安全方面对美国技术的依赖:导弹防御依赖“爱国者”系统,警察和军事AI依赖Palantir,甚至桌面软件也依赖微软。与大多数欧洲国家一样,丹麦在创新方面难以与硅谷竞争。Zendesk和Unity等初创公司经常将总部迁至美国。

“技术的所有权已成为所有冲突中的一个因素,”丹麦商业与竞争力部长马丁·利德加德(Martin Lidegaard)表示。虽然美国仍然是丹麦最重要的商业伙伴,“但我们需要确保……我们不会依赖美国技术。”

丹麦已采取了一些小步骤——例如利用乌克兰的专业知识为乌克兰制造无人机——以建立国防基础。利德加德计划公布一项更具雄心的战略,以刺激国防生产。

虽然瑞典拥有规模庞大的国防工业,但它正在推动与欧洲盟友及加拿大的联合采购,以减轻对美国的依赖。瑞典正在从法国购买护卫舰,而法国则在从瑞典的萨博(Saab)公司购买GlobalEye雷达监视机。制造GlobalEye机身的加拿大目前正在考虑购买。

美国仍然是他们的主要市场,但在欧盟签署的自由贸易协定的帮助下,增量增长将越来越多地来自其他地区。

“如今我们与加拿大的贸易比与美国的贸易更容易,”丹麦主要商业协会丹麦工业协会(Dansk Industri)负责人拉斯·桑达尔·索伦森(Lars Sandahl Sorensen)表示。“我们目前在绿色转型方面对澳大利亚进行了大量投资。”

此外,他们也在深化彼此之间的合作。利德加德及其北欧同行刚刚宣布成立一个“北欧增长联盟”,旨在促进量子技术、数据中心和航天等领域的合作,同时减少繁文缛节。

在其他地方,向一个开放程度较低、更加危险的世界转型代价高昂。军费开支加剧了目前席卷法国的财政危机。与美国的贸易战使加拿大经济陷入低谷。德国政坛则因右翼政党的崛起而陷入动荡。

丹麦和瑞典的应对情况较好,部分原因在于从过去吸取的教训。在20世纪90年代,瑞典经历了银行倒闭、赤字飙升和失业,利率曾一度触及500%。

“你在瑞典经济政策中看到的所有你认为好的东西,在很大程度上都是90年代危机的产物,”瑞典央行(Riksbank)的特德恩(Thedéen)表示。这包括对赤字的严格规定、独立的中央银行,以及一个将退休金与预期寿命延长挂钩的养老金体系。他说,这使得政治家很难在财政上挥霍无度。

丹麦近期一直保持盈余。任何担心变成法国的国家,研究丹麦和瑞典都将大有裨益。

两名美国人获得诺贝尔经济学奖

奖项委员会在斯德哥尔摩宣布诺贝尔经济学奖得主。

JONATHAN NACKSTRAND / 作者:保罗·汉农(PAUL HANNON)

两名美国经济学家罗伯特·霍尔(Robert E. Hall)和迈克尔·伍德福德(Michael Woodford)因在研究家庭和企业预期如何为经济稳定奠定基础方面所做的工作,被授予诺贝尔经济学奖。

霍尔是斯坦福大学的经济学教授,而伍德福德在哥伦比亚大学担任相同职务。1200 万 瑞典克朗的奖金(约合 $1.300 万)将由两人平分。

由约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯(John Maynard Keynes)在20世纪30年代首次提出的、旨在经济过冷或过热时稳定经济的政策在20世纪70年代之前一直有效,但随后这些政策被证明无法应对一系列能源冲击。

诺贝尔奖组织表示,霍尔和伍德福德的工作有助于提供一个框架,用以理解为何这些政策会失效,并强调了政府和中央银行向家庭及企业清晰沟通其计划及其干预原因的重要性。

“对于做出消费决策的人来说,他们对未来政策可能走向的预期,对于政策效果至关重要,”伍德福德告诉记者。

诺贝尔委员会重点提到了伍德福德 2003 年的著作《利率与价格:货币政策理论基础》(Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy),认为这是概述基于他与霍尔研究而建立的新框架的关键著作。“我非常激动,”伍德福德说,“这是一个巨大的荣誉,令人惊喜。”

霍尔也表示该奖项出乎意料。“我职业生涯一直致力于理解经济如何运作,追随那些有趣的问题,无论它们将我引向何方,”他说,“当我认为自己有一个新想法时,下一步就是弄清楚它是否真的是新的,是否正确,以及是否重要。”

这种新方法的一个关键例子是中央银行使用“前瞻性指引”(forward guidance),即向企业和家庭提供关于利率可能如何变化的清晰理解。

在全球金融危机之后,当关键利率已被降至零且需要进一步刺激以避免陷入通货紧缩时,前瞻性指引被各国中央银行广泛采用。通过向家庭和企业保证借贷成本将在相当长的一段时间内保持低位,中央银行希望刺激投资借贷。

“在 2009 年起之后的几年里,就利率政策可能的未来路径做出更明确的声明是应对措施的重要组成部分,我认为这有助于实现更好的稳定,”伍德福德说。

然而,这种形式的前瞻性指引在2020年代已不再受欢迎,因为全球经济受到供应冲击的冲击,导致即使是对未来利率路径做出初步承诺都变得十分困难。美联储主席凯文·沃什(Kevin Warsh)就是前瞻性指引使用方式的批评者。

霍尔和伍德福德的工作还强调了公信力对于中央银行和政府政策成功的重要性。他们的研究表明,如果人们相信中央银行会足够地提高关键利率以抑制通货膨胀,那么家庭和企业就不太可能采取那些会强化价格上涨趋势的行为。

期权显示风险偏好强烈

接第一页

来源:Carrick Lane

接第一页

“增长依然存在,”这位总部位于洛杉矶的顾问表示。贝里(Berry)一直在追逐包括英伟达(Nvidia)、亚马逊(Amazon)和 SpaceX 在内的超大市值科技股的涨幅。“短期波动——你必须有承受它的胆量,”贝里说。

随着那个时代的许多热门股票最终失去光彩,模因股(meme-stock)的热潮可能已经消退。但过去五年中,个人投资者对市场的热情反而日益增强。即使在 2025 年 4 月全球贸易战令专业投资者感到不安并引发深度抛售期间,这一群体仍坚持“逢低买入”。他们助力打造了新一批 AI 宠儿,并涌入 SpaceX 的首次公开募股(IPO)。而且他们至今仍在买入。

周一,道琼斯工业平均指数上涨 0.4%,约 196 点。标准普尔 500 指数下跌不足 0.1%,纳斯达克综合指数下跌 0.4%。

另一个迹象表明,投资者的感受与 2021 年时非常相似:越来越多的交易员倾向于押注短期价格波动。

根据 Carrick Lane 合伙人约翰·马歇尔(John Marshall)的数据,目前超过一半的单股期权交易量集中在距离到期日不足两周的合约中。

这种持久乐观情绪背后的原因之一是强劲的公司利润,这推动了股市在今年多次创下纪录。

8000 亿美元 billion

根据 FactSet 的数据,标准普尔 500 指数成分公司第三季度的盈利增长预计将比去年同期增长约 30%。对于 2026 年,利润预计将增长 33%。

分析师表示,个人投资者在 2026 年变得更加挑剔,他们选择将资金投入少数几个高信心标的,而非在市场整体下跌时买入。在 6 月达到顶峰的存储股和芯片制造商股票爆发式上涨之后,零售交易活动在夏季有所放缓。

但根据 Citadel Securities 的数据,这种夏季的冷却在历史上往往会在 10 月反转——而 DIY 交易者在今年剩余时间里可能会更加积极地参与。

不过,并非所有人都在全力投资衍生品。

但即使是更厌恶风险的投资者也选择留在市场中。

嘉信理财(Charles Schwab)客户在 9 月买入最多的头寸是一只追踪道琼斯美国股息 100 指数(Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index)的交易所交易基金(ETF)。这是自嘉信理财在 2021 年开始收集该数据以来,ETF 首次占据该位置。根据嘉信理财的数据,客户上个月还抢购了与 ETF 挂钩的看涨期权。

“这是一种稍微谨慎一点的乐观,”嘉信理财首席交易策略师乔·马佐拉(Joe Mazzola)表示,“他们绝对在寻求逢低买入。”

---

美国观察

讣告

---

《绝命毒师》明星 RJ Mitte 逝世,享年 34 岁

当局及其代表表示,《绝命毒师》(Breaking Bad)演员兼残疾权利倡导者 RJ Mitte 周一去世,享年 34 岁。

卡梅伦县治安法官辛迪·希诺霍萨(Cyndi Hinojosa)宣布,患有脑瘫的 Mitte 在其位于德克萨斯州布朗斯维尔的住所(据其认为)去世。她无法提供死因,但将进行尸检。

——美联社

---

纽约 演员在飞机事件后被拘留

当局表示,演员塞尔玛·布莱尔(Selma Blair)在从洛杉矶飞往纽约的航班上因肢体暴力并导致两名乘务员受伤而被拘留。54 岁的布莱尔于周日晚上在纽约肯尼迪(JFK)机场被拘留。布莱尔的一名代表在声明中表示,她发生了医疗紧急情况,导致了所谓的行为。她于 2018 年被诊断出患有多发性硬化症。

-美联社

---

更正与澄清

读者可以通过发送电子邮件至 wsjcontact@wsj.com 或拨打 888-762-5450 向《华尔街日报》报告新闻文章中的任何错误。

联邦特工搜查奥马尔住所

国土安全部移民调查被提及;她抨击此举为“滥用权力”

作者:SADIE GURMAN

以及 JOHN MCCORMICK

华盛顿——据知情人士透露,联邦特工周一搜查了众议员伊尔汗·奥马尔(Ilhan Omar,民主党,明尼苏达州)位于华盛顿特区的住所,此次行动是一项刑事调查的一部分。

知情人士表示,搜查由国土安全调查局(Homeland Security Investigations)的特工执行。调查详情尚不明确,但其中一名知情人士称,该调查已持续很长时间且与移民相关。

奥马尔是所谓的“小分队”(the Squad)的创始成员之一,该团体由一群进步派的有色人种女性国会议员组成,以挑战民主党领导层以及公开批评特朗普总统而闻名。

美国司法部(DOJ)表示,特工在哥伦比亚特区地区执行了经法院授权的搜查,但拒绝详细说明。

奥马尔的办公室发表声明,对此次搜查表示反对。

声明称:“特朗普领导下的国土安全部(DHS)发起的这次突袭是对权力的公然滥用,也是将联邦执法机构武器化以针对政治敌人的前所未有的升级。十年来,唐纳德·特朗普一直用煽动性的言论无情地攻击国会议员伊尔汗·奥马尔,反复将她视为目标。现在,这些攻击升级为了毫无意义的联邦突袭。”

此次搜查发生在11月选举前仅三周,奥马尔正在竞选第五任期。为了避免出现党派影响的迹象,美国司法部传统上会尽量避免在选举前 60 天内采取涉及政治候选人的公开调查步骤。

特朗普表示,联邦官员正在“非常仔细地”审查奥马尔。

“我一直觉得她完全是个骗子,”特朗普说。“她是个糟糕的人。就是一个爱抱怨的人。她来自一个根本算不上国家的国家,然后她来到这里,抱怨我们的宪法。”

国土安全部部长马克韦恩·马林(Markwayne Mullin)在9月告诉一名保守派播客主持人,联邦政府对奥马尔的调查仍在继续,他称奥马尔“为了将她的兄弟带入美国而与他结婚”。十多年来,她一直否认这一说法。

44 岁的奥马尔长期以来一直是特朗普和保守派攻击的目标。

奥马尔 1982 年出生于索马里摩加迪沙,于 20 世纪 90 年代抵达美国。在她进入高中时,她的家人搬到了明尼苏达州。

奥马尔与丈夫蒂姆·迈内特(Tim Mynett)共同居住在华盛顿的家中。

这位国会议员于 2018 年首次当选,其选区是包括明尼阿波利斯在内的民主党强势选区。

TIM EVANS / REUTERS

众议员伊尔汗·奥马尔

约塞米蒂土地交换引发争端

作者:凯特·金(KATE KING)

约塞米蒂国家公园边缘的一小片草地和林地,竟成了关于国家公园是否允许开发的意外战场。

开发商杰夫·波里(Jeff Pori)与国家公园管理局签署了一项初步协议,根据该协议,他将转让一块位于加利福尼亚州的财产,以换取约塞米蒂国家公园近 750,000 英亩广阔区域西侧边界约一英亩的土地。

国家公园管理局最近与一名拉斯维加斯的开发商签署了一项土地交换初步协议。根据该安排,联邦政府将提供位于加利福尼亚州内华达山脉、约塞米蒂国家公园近 750,000 英亩广阔区域西侧边界约一英亩的土地。

这将允许开发商杰夫·波里从其相邻的财产修建一条进入公园的短路。波里表示,如果没有这条路,他计划建设的乡村度假村的客人将不得不沿着蜿蜒的土路行驶约 45 分钟才能到达公园的正门。

作为交换,波里同意向国家公园管理局转让一块位于加利福尼亚州其他地方、价值相当的财产。他表示,他的项目将为这座热门公园增加急需的住宿设施,让更多人能够享受其中。

“我记得那里有很多徒步路线,还有很多溪流和河流,”在湾区长大、小时候常与亲友在约塞米蒂露营的波里说道,“那里简直就像天堂一样。”

拟议中的土地交换消息引发了环保人士、前约塞米蒂官员以及许多公众的愤怒。约塞米蒂前主管西塞莉·马尔多恩(Cicely Muldoon)表示,这次交换将开创一个危险的先例,释放出一种信号,即受保护的自然空间可以被用来与私人利益进行交易。

“这不是一块可以用作房地产交易的土地,”马尔多恩说。

波里的律师兰尼·戴维斯(Lanny Davis)表示,他收到了如此之多的威胁信,以至于达到了 iPhone 屏蔽电子邮件地址的上限。

这次反弹表明,美国人对国家公园——尤其是像以瀑布闻名的约塞米蒂这类“皇冠上的明珠”——持有多么强烈的保护意识,以及有些人如何认为任何倾向于私人开发的举动都是在越界。

特朗普政府持有不同的观点。该政府一直愿意考虑向私人开发商和企业开放受保护的联邦土地。

去年,该政府成立了一个工作组,旨在确定可用于建设经济适用房的联邦土地,以努力解决国家的住房短缺问题。

联邦机构还在寻求与私人土地所有者进行拟议的土地交换。在德克萨斯州,一名联邦法官最近允许美国鱼类及野生动物管理局与埃隆·马斯克的 SpaceX 之间拟议的土地交换继续进行。

在乔治亚州,国家公园管理局已签署初步协议,将联邦土地交给坎伯兰岛(一座联邦保护的屏障岛荒野)的两名私人土地所有者,以换取生态敏感区域内的私人持有地块。

多年来,一些涉及国家公园的土地交换确实发生过,包括与大沼泽地的一家公共事业公司达成的协议,以及一项允许圣约翰岛在维京群岛国家公园的一块地块上建设公立学校的交换。

但环保人士表示,历史上土地交换仅被用于扩大联邦公园土地的边界。

“现在他们利用同样的权力,将公园的一部分切割出去,以造福一名私人开发商,”非党派倡导组织国家公园保护协会(National Parks Conservation Association)政府事务副总裁埃德·斯蒂尔利(Ed Stierli)说道。

2024 年,波里购买了约塞米蒂边界外 83 英亩的土地。这块被称为“海泽尔格林牧场”(Hazel Green Ranch)的财产是一块未开发的草地。

波里通过其房地产公司 Kingsbarn Realty Capital,希望建造一个与 Hazel Green Ranch 前业主提议类似的项目:一座拥有 150 间客房的旅馆,以及散布在草地周边的木屋。

但为了让该业务可行,他需要在联邦土地上修建一条 700 英尺长的道路,将其房产与通往约塞米蒂(Yosemite)的 Big Oak Flat 路连接起来。

波里深知获得批准将是一场艰苦的战斗。他是罗素·盖泽(Russell Geyser)的朋友兼商业伙伴,而罗素是 Hazel Green Ranch 前业主刘易斯·盖泽(Lewis Geyser)的儿子,后者此前曾就此问题经历了一场长达五年的法律斗争并以失败告终。

波里表示,他在两年前首次向约塞米蒂官员申请一项允许其修建拟议道路的地役权,但被告知“不行”。随后,他和戴维斯于去年会见了内政部的官员,对方提供了一个可能的解决方案:土地交换。

批评人士指出,波里向包括特朗普在内的共和党竞选活动和候选人提供了总计 $4,700 的政治捐款,认为这证明他的请求可能得到了特殊照顾。

内政部新闻办公室表示,在尚未最终敲定的土地交换问题上,不存在为了达成预定结果而施加的政治压力。波里和戴维斯则表示,他们从未寻求政治恩惠。即便土地交换能够推进,波里在获得拟议开发项目的批准之前,仍面临漫长的流程。

“我在购买时完全没有任何保证,”他说,“我对此心知肚明。”

特朗普表示正考虑解雇吉尔福伊尔

作者:PHILIP WEGMANN

特朗普总统表示,他正在“考虑”解雇金伯利·吉尔福伊尔,并且他对这位驻希腊大使“并不满意”。此前有披露称,吉尔福伊尔在确认听证会前曾要求一名捐赠者支付其个人费用。

《华尔街日报》率先报道了吉尔福伊尔去年发送的短信,她在短信中要求特朗普的捐赠者埃里克·德特斯(Eric Deters)向她的美国运通(American Express)账户汇款 $100,000。“如果你把钱汇给美国运通,任何地方都不会显示,”

她在 Signal 上写道。“拜托了。”

德特斯曾是肯塔基州的国会候选人,此前曾向吉尔福伊尔支付过演讲费。他还向小唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump Jr.)支付了类似的 $200,000,向埃里克·特朗普(Eric Trump)支付了 $100,000。然而,他拒绝支付她的信用卡账单。

美国国务院监察长办公室目前正在调查吉尔福伊尔是否收受了私人商人的礼物或好处。《华尔街日报》随后报道了一段该外交官的音频,她在音频中吹嘘希腊商业大亨支付了她前往巴黎的机票以及豪华酒店住宿费用。

周一在被问及关于吉尔福伊尔潜在违规行为的报道以及是否会解雇她时,特朗普说:“嗯,我们正在研究这件事。是的,我们很不满意。”

鉴于这些指控,特朗普政府官员在周末讨论了吉尔福伊尔是否应继续担任大使。据一名熟悉审议情况的高级政府官员透露,一些人提出建议,要求这位使节自愿辞职,以避免特朗普因不得不解雇她而感到尴尬。

吉尔福伊尔的发言人未回应置评请求。

吉尔福伊尔的律师杰西·宾纳尔(Jesse Binnall)此前告诉本报,大使对显示她要求德特斯支付信用卡账单的短信真实性持有异议。他表示,她在被提名之前曾受雇在活动中演讲,“在前往并支持这些爱国活动的过程中,对方仍欠她余额。”德特斯则表示他并不欠吉尔福伊尔任何余额。

吉尔福伊尔此前曾与总统长子小唐纳德·特朗普订婚。

众议员唐·拜尔(Don Beyer,民主党,弗吉尼亚州)呼吁解雇吉尔福伊尔,并且“如果她触犯了法律——这看起来极有可能——就对其提起公诉”。众议院监督委员会的最高级别民主党人、加利福尼亚州众议员罗伯特·加西亚(Robert Garcia)在给吉尔福伊尔的一封信中表示,报道中的行为“引发了严重的公共腐败和国家安全担忧”,并要求她提供财务记录以及与某些政府官员的通信副本。

加州网约车司机转向新工会

左图为8月的司机们;右图为玛格丽塔·佩尼亚洛萨,她表示自2017年以来,驾驶成本已经翻倍。

从左至右:迈克·布莱克 / 路透社,玛格丽塔·佩尼亚洛萨

作者:保罗·基尔南(PAUL KIERNAN)

洛杉矶——当玛格丽塔·佩尼亚洛萨(Margarita Peñalosa)在2017, 开始为Uber和Lyft开车时,每天工作8小时就足以支付生活开支并给在哥伦比亚的家人寄钱。现在她说,每天需要工作12小时。

“现在的驾驶成本是我刚开始时的两倍,”46岁的佩尼亚洛萨说道。

她的沮丧解释了为什么她以及超过50,000名加州网约车司机最近签署了加入新成立的加州零工工人联合会(California Gig Workers Union)的申请卡。组织者告诉司机,该工会可以帮助他们在全美生活成本最高、且汽油价格最高、无人驾驶出租车车队日益扩大的州之一,争取更多的到手收入,而这些因素正在削弱零工经济的盈利能力。

该工会标志着美国迄今为止在组织全国数百万名此类劳动力方面所做的最大努力。网约车司机可以自行安排时间,这让他们在照顾孩子或从事其他工作时具有灵活性。但由于他们被归类为独立承包商而非雇员,在美国大部分地区,零工工人缺乏传统的劳动保护。这些保护包括最低工资法、工人赔偿和集体谈判权。

他们没有小时工资,

Uber和Lyft的司机按单计费。为了接收行程请求,他们必须在网约车应用程序中保持“在线”状态。平台通过其专有算法确定并向司机提供预估费率,司机必须学会快速区分值得接的订单和低薪订单。

他们在方向盘后等待行程请求的时间,或者在空车状态下从遥远的目的地返回的时间,是没有报酬的。

更多以民主党为主的城市和州正在为零工工人扩大新的劳动保护。马萨诸塞州在5月认证了全美首个网约车司机工会,比加州早几个月。在州长J.B.普利兹克(J.B. Pritzker)8月签署一项允许Uber和Lyft司机组建工会的法律后,伊利诺伊州可能很快效仿。

加州和马萨诸塞州还保证司机在积极驾驶乘客期间可获得基于时间的最低工资,但其余时间仍没有报酬。

在俄勒冈州,波特兰市议会今年考虑了一项提案,旨在将“抽成率”(即乘客车费中交给Uber和Lyft的份额)上限设定为20%。纽约市、华盛顿州和明尼苏达州已采取相关规定,保证司机每英里赚取最低金额。

司机需要支付车辆相关费用,包括保险、维修和保养成本,这些费用在近年来均超过了通货膨胀率。此外,他们还受到汽油价格的影响,今年全美汽油价格上涨超过50%。美国汽车协会(AAA)表示,加州司机加注普通汽油的价格约为每加仑\$6.31,是所有州中平均价格最高的。

Lyft拒绝就司机薪酬发表评论。一名Uber发言人表示,该公司司机在加州“积极工作”时(指从接受订单到放下乘客之间的时间)每小时收入超过\$34,比2019年增长了17%。

在扣除运营成本以及在线但未积极服务客户的时间后,几名在洛杉矶的网约车司机表示,他们的实际时薪经常低于该州\$16.90的最低工资。“汽油费快把我搞死了,”46岁的阿尔图尔·格沃基扬(Artur Gevorkyan)说,他自2015年起一直为Uber开车。

根据对其工资单的审查,在他近期表现较好的一周里,大约 22 小时的实际驾驶时间带来了 1,006 美元的税前及费用前收入。按实际驾驶时间计算,这意味着他的每小时总收入接近 45.50 美元。但如果算上他为 Uber 在线等待的额外 30 小时,同一周的税前收入将低于每小时 19.50 美元。

他的支出包括每月 600 美元的 2019 款英菲尼迪 (Infiniti) QX60 车辆还款,每六个月近 800 美元的保险费,以及在典型的 250 英里行驶日中近 70 美元的汽油费。

Gridwise 是一个被数十万名 Uber 和 Lyft 司机使用的分析平台,该平台估计,第二季度全美平均每小时在线总收入为 24.38 美元。这一数字比去年同期增长了 7.3%,但比 2021 年下降了约 10%。

Uber 和 Lyft 没有抵制工会化进程,部分原因是允许司机组建工会的加利福尼亚州法案是一项立法交易的一部分,该交易降低了这些共享出行公司的保险成本。

AARON SCHWARTZ / GETTY IMAGES

“反 Aipac”超级政治行动委员会的主要捐赠者 候选人和政治委员会的捐款

周六,东波托马克高尔夫球场(East Potomac Golf Links)可见一棵被砍倒的树。尽管法院已下达禁令,但仍有多达 430 棵树被移除。

法官痛批政府砍伐高尔夫球场树木

作者:LOUISE RADNOFSKY

一名负责监督挑战特朗普总统改造华盛顿特区一家公共高尔夫球场计划之诉讼的联邦法官愤怒地表示,政府在周末短时间内砍伐了东波托马克高尔夫球场(East Potomac Golf Links)周围数百棵树木,违反了她的指示。

美国地方法院法官安娜·雷耶斯(Ana Reyes)此前曾警告政府,在未告知她的情况下不得在该项目上采取不可逆转的步骤。周一,她暂时禁止进一步移除树木,并警告政府,任何最轻微的违规行为都将导致她启动蔑视法庭程序。

她还要求三名内政部官员在宣誓后就政府在周五晚间告知法院之前的几天内制定的移除计划提供证词。工人于周六上午开始砍伐树木,当司法部一名律师暗示多达 430 棵树已被移除时,雷耶斯对此大发雷霆。

“我已经给了政府所有的信任,认为它不会做出现在这样的行为,”这位由拜登提名任命的法官在长达三小时的听证会上说道。

她说,已经发生的事情使政府在本案中“失去了所有的信誉”。

在听证会结束时,雷耶斯质疑“我是否被欺骗了”。

司法部律师马里莎·皮罗帕托(Marissa Piropato)表示,移除树木是长期维护计划的一部分,与任何高尔夫球场项目无关。她说:“法官阁下,这不是翻新。”

东波托马克设施已开放一个多世纪,在靠近华盛顿著名纪念碑的风景如画的环境中,为公众提供价格实惠的绿费。

特朗普曾形容该设施破旧不堪,并数月来一直讨论对其进行重新开发,旨在创建一个能够举办重大高尔夫锦标赛的球场。他此前表示翻新工作将于 9 月开始。

在周末提交的法庭文件中,政府表示该项目“仍处于早期和概念阶段”。

华盛顿特区保护联盟(DC Preservation League)今年早些时候提起诉讼,提出了多项法律论据,包括该项目引发了环境担忧且超出了总统的职权。政府则表示其行为合法合规,并主张该诉讼过于仓促。

特朗普在国家首都迅速推进了多个项目,包括建造白宫舞厅。法院一直难以跟上其进度。

雷耶斯在之前的听证会上表示担心,特朗普政府可能会迅速推进高尔夫球场翻新,然后告诉她已经太晚,无法“叫停火车”。

该法官在那些听证会上表示,政府在采取重大行动之前需要通知她。

特朗普及其盟友使用的信托基金获巨额资金

根据特朗普及其盟友用于接收资金的非营利组织提交的一份新文件,在特朗普总统为新白宫舞厅及华盛顿周边遗产项目筹集的 3亿美元 中,十位超级捐赠者的贡献超过了总额的一半。

---

作者:Brian Schwartz, Annie Linskey 和 Theo Francis

这些捐赠者的身份并未包含在国家广场信托基金(Trust for the National Mall)的公开申报文件中。该信托基金是一家历史悠久的非营利组织,白宫此前也利用该组织管理为凯旋门和玫瑰园筹集的资金。每位捐赠者的捐款金额在 1000万美元 和 2500万美元 之间。

年度申报文件显示,该信托基金去年的捐款和赠款记录为 3.2亿美元,高于 2024. 的不足 1000万美元。其中三位捐赠者每人捐赠了 2500万美元。文件还显示,该信托基金去年的支出达到 2.1亿美元,其中大部分用于维护和资本改良项目。

《华尔街日报》审阅的文件并未显示每个项目的具体资金去向,也未列出捐赠者的姓名。白宫此前曾确认部分舞厅项目的捐赠者,但未披露其具体捐款金额。

国家广场信托基金和白宫的发言人未回应置评请求。

本报此前报道,苹果公司为白宫舞厅项目开出了一张约 2500万美元 的支票,而微软等公司则捐赠了约 1000万美元。Alphabet 旗下的子公司 YouTube 向该非营利组织捐赠了 2200万美元 用于舞厅建设,这是特朗普在 2021 年对该公司提起的一项民事诉讼和解协议的一部分。

劳拉与艾萨克·珀尔穆特基金会(Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Foundation)向该信托基金捐赠了 $20.300 万,并在其自身的税务申报文件中将该款项标注为“受限——白宫舞厅”。这是由前漫威娱乐董事长艾克·珀尔穆特(Ike Perlmutter)及其妻子创建的珀尔穆特基金会在报告年度内最大的一笔捐款。

本报此前报道,特朗普将其第二任期的重点放在美化华盛顿上,并敦促公司和捐赠者开出数千万美元的支票来资助这些项目。本报报道称,他的首席筹款人梅雷迪思·奥鲁克(Meredith O'Rourke)经常致电各大公司,提出具体且有时高达八位数的资金请求。

法律并不禁止总统为非营利组织筹集无限额的资金,且无需公开披露捐赠者。特朗普从那些在政府面前有业务往来的公司中进行前所未有的筹款,引发了国会民主党人对潜在利益冲突的担忧。特朗普的一位发言人此前表示,总统是“现代政治史上最成功的筹款人”,且“特朗普总统是不可能被收买的”。

新公布的文件确实提供了一些关于资金用途的细节。该信托基金向混凝土制造商 Florida Architectural Precast 支付了超过 $800,000,用于建筑及其他项目服务。

揭秘助力左翼新秀的捐赠者

本报分析中的进步派候选人 $^{†}$

\*包括 24 个进步派政治行动委员会(PAC)和倡议团体。Jan. 1, 2025, 通过 Oct. 7, 2026. 另有 $4.600 万 支出分布在其他 23 个州和华盛顿特区,而在 15 个州没有支出。iCA-11 在其初选中有两名进步派候选人。

来源:AdImpact(支出);AP(结果、现任者)

今年在密歇根州,一个誓要对抗亲以色列资金的新超级 PAC 投入了 50 多万美元,以支持进步派人士阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德(Abdul El-Sayed)竞选参议员。其出资者是一群几乎不为人知的政治捐赠者,其中许多人在去年之前从未参与政治捐款,但此后每人捐款高达 100万美元。

---

作者:玛吉·塞文斯 (Maggie Severns)、安东尼·德巴罗斯 (Anthony DeBarros) 和 ISSN 卡拉·达佩纳 (Kara Dapena)

在纽约,亿万富翁亚历克斯·索罗斯 (Alex Soros) 直接向进步派政治人物开具支票,其中包括华盛顿州的普拉米拉·贾亚帕尔 (Pramila Jayapal) 众议员和明尼苏达州的伊尔汗·奥马尔 (Ilhan Omar) 众议员。

这些捐款是索罗斯及其父亲乔治 (George) 计划今年向民主党事业提供的数百万美元资金的一部分。

而在费城,由外部团体支付的近百万美元电视广告正在助力民主党众议员候选人克里斯·拉布 (Chris Rabb),这些广告重点强调了纽约州众议员亚历山德里娅·奥卡西奥-科尔特斯 (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 对他的认可,以及他为“全民医疗保险”而战的意愿。

民主党的左翼—。

---

曼达尼因素

佐兰·曼达尼(Zohran Mamdani)去年秋天当选纽约市市长,开启了一个政治新时代,并催生了新一代政治捐赠者。其中许多人对中东战争持批评态度,并对美国以色列公共事务委员会(Aipac)通过资金支持亲以色列政治人物的行为感到不满。

民主党左翼在选举上的筹款和支出仅为许多共和党人及民主党建制派的一小部分。但随着极左翼势头增强,支持者们正致力于扩大其资金规模。

即使是完全由会员费资助并主要依赖志愿者的美国民主社会主义者(DSA),也在尝试筹集更多资金。

虽然 DSA 会员的入门会费通常每月 $10 起,但该组织新推出的基于收入的“团结会费”选项将捐款额设定在会员收入的 1%,数额要高得多。DSA 的网站上宣传道:“为 99% 的人贡献你的 1%。”

另一个专注于识别并帮助进步派候选人的组织——正义民主党人(Justice Democrats)表示,其目标是在那些对手能利用资金优势通过广告压制进步派的竞选中保持竞争力。

“我们永远无法拥有 Aipac 或加密货币行业那样规模的资金,”该组织发言人乌萨马·安德拉比(Usamah Andrabi)说道。他指的是亲以色列的美国以色列公共事务委员会以及在期中选举期间支出超过 9000万美元 的加密货币行业。(Aipac 发言人德林·苏萨(Deryn Sousa)表示,该组织是“由美国个人组成的会员组织,而非一个行业”。)

过去,进步派的捐赠者通常是年长的、富有的嬉皮士或好莱坞的成功人士。

而新群体则更年轻,通常由南亚或中东裔美国人组成,从事技术和医学等领域。

筹款公司 NWF Strategies 的首席执行官萨斯维克·卡利尤尔(Sathvik Kaliyur)表示,他的目标是让那些没有资金背景的候选人更容易参选。其客户包括曼达尼和埃尔-赛义德(El-Sayed)。

许多巨额支票流向了一个旨在成为“反 Aipac”力量的超级政治行动委员会(super PAC),名为“美国优先”(American Priorities)。该组织利用资金支持批评以色列的进步派,包括投入超过 100 万美元帮助克莱尔·瓦尔德兹(Claire Valdez)和达里亚利扎·阿维拉·切瓦利埃(Darializa Avila Chevalier)当选,两人均为 DSA 支持的候选人,并赢得了纽约国会初选。

这些广告并未将以色列或巴勒斯坦领土作为议题,而是强调生活成本问题,并指出这两位女性得到了“曼达尼的认可”。

该组织的一位资助者、德克萨斯州企业家萨姆·马赫鲁克(Sam Mahrouq)表示,他支持那些“鼓励平衡的美国外交政策,并反对腐败、歧视、无休止的战争以及过度的特殊利益影响”的努力。

谁是大额捐赠者?

最大的捐赠者通常并不认为自己是民主社会主义者:

名单中包括老派进步派,以及关注堕胎权和环境的捐赠者,他们的资金正在帮助那些在这些问题上持有相同观点的候选人。

建制派团体现在也开始支持在摇摆选区(包括加利福尼亚州中央谷地)赢得初选的进步派候选人。

例如,一个与众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯(Hakeem Jeffries)相关的超级 PAC 及其附属组织,已在电视广告上支出或预订了超过 900万美元 在电视广告上,以帮助教育工作者兰迪·维莱加斯(Randy Villegas)。

一些在“红区”(共和党占优选区)参选的民主党人正获得意想不到的帮助:由伊利诺伊州民主党州长 J.B. 普里茨克(J.B. Pritzker)发起的一个超级 PAC。

该超级 PAC 已在田纳西州一个共和党倾向严重的选区预订了超过 200万美元 的电视广告,以支持获得奥卡西奥-科尔特斯背书的贾斯汀·皮尔森。

研究方法

《华尔街日报》审查了 52 个竞选委员会和 19 个 PAC 的联邦选举委员会(FEC)申报文件。候选人的入选标准是截至 9 月获得美国民主社会主义者、正义民主党(Justice Democrats)和劳动家庭党(Working Families Party)的背书。PAC 的入选标准是其在包含进步派候选人的竞选中投入的广告支出。为了计算捐赠总额,《日报》检索了个人捐款记录。由于捐赠者在 FEC 申报文件中经常出现多种姓名拼写、地址或雇主,当《日报》能够确定记录代表同一人时,会对金额进行合并。

进步派顶级捐赠者

对进步派候选人和政治委员会的捐款

赛卡特·查克拉巴蒂(加州,科技与政治)今年在加州竞选国会议员,向自己的委员会捐款超过 1100万美元,随后他将该委员会转换为一个超级 PAC。

进步派捐款

由乔治·索罗斯和亚历克斯·索罗斯运营的民主 PAC(纽约,金融)同时支持民主党建制派事业和左翼。

德博拉·西蒙(印第安纳州,房地产投资世家)是民主党的长期巨额捐赠者,以支持计划生育协会(Planned Parenthood)而闻名。

NJ-10 NY-18 NY-19 PA-07

苏珊·曼德尔(康涅狄格州,金融)是环境事业的主要捐赠者。250万美元

NY-18 NY-19 PA-07

玛丽·奎恩·德莱尼(加州,房地产投资)及其家族信托向一系列民主党候选人和事业提供捐款。

来源:联邦选举委员会(捐款)

数据无处不在,但智能并非如此。

---

作者:George Popstefanov,PMG 创始人兼首席执行官

AI 加速了分析,自动化了任务,并产生了任何组织都无法完全吸收的产出。客户信号实时更新。媒体每小时都在碎片化。商业、文化和技术的演进速度,已经超过了旨在管理它们的运营模式。

然而,大多数增长模型仍然在孤岛中运行。

获取数据并不等同于拥有智能。而单纯的智能本身也不是一种优势。

优势产生于智能驱动行动之时。

公司们在旨在创造可见性的技术上投入了数十亿美元。但缺乏整合的可见性并未带来更好的业绩,反而增加了复杂性。

更多的数据并没有解决碎片化问题,而是将其暴露无遗。

如今表现卓越的公司,并非那些拥有更多信息的公司,而是那些在结构上能够针对信息采取行动的公司。它们以集成系统的形式运作,使战略、激活、商业和衡量在实时状态下保持一致。智能并不存在于报告中,而是在不断复利增长。

2010年,我们开始为这一时刻而构建。

从一开始,PMG 就被设计为一家平台公司。一个将人才、技术和智能整合为可量化增长的统一系统。

我们的专利操作系统 Alli 将战略与执行、执行与衡量连接起来,在决策与结果之间创造了连续性。洞察转化为决策,决策环环相扣,业绩由此复利。

这不是一个由技术增强的服务模式。

这是一个为现代企业增长方式而构建的系统。

随着 AI 重塑工作流,以及内容、媒体和商业之间的界限继续模糊,洞察与行动之间的差距将会扩大。那些在结构上能够弥合这一差距的公司将处于领先地位,而未能做到此点的公司将难以跟上步伐。

数据在倍增,工具在演进。

PMG 是一家为该未来而构建的平台公司。

下一个时代属于那些为行动而设计的公司。

世界新闻

习近平的超级大国雄心助长债务螺旋

注:2025年数据为预估值。不包括与专项建设资金及其他政府引导基金挂钩的债务。按 $1=6.7 元汇率换算。

来源:国际货币基金组织

中国领导人正主导一场扼杀经济并外溢至海外的债务激增

作者:BRIAN SPEGELE

中国领导人习近平致力于投入数万亿美元使中国成为技术和军事超级大国,而他正主导着一场危险的债务螺旋,这不仅在扼杀国内经济,也在损害贸易伙伴。

近期,许多国家债务负担的增加惊扰了投资者。但很少有国家的债务激增像中国这样剧烈。

去年,中国的非金融部门信贷(一项衡量企业、政府和家庭借款的广泛指标)超过了国内生产总值的 $300\%$,比 2019 年底高出 60 个百分点,目前已远超美国。根据国际清算银行的数据,自习近平在 2012年底就任以来,该项指标已增长超过 $43 万亿美元。

其中大部分资金被浪费在资助需求不足的工厂和公寓楼上,引发了破坏性的价格战,并损害了利润和工资。

许多经济学家表示,中国可能并未面临迫在眉睫的金融危机,部分原因是债务积累主要依赖于国内储蓄,而非可能更快抛售债务的外国投资者。

但中国的债务洪水也日益成为全球的问题。需要偿还这笔巨额债务的中国公司正在生产远超国内消费者需求的汽车、太阳能电池板和电子产品。作为回应,出口商将这些商品倾销到国外市场,造成了每年数万亿美元的贸易顺差。

尽管与许多国家存在贸易紧张局势——包括

中国政府债务(按类型分)

欧洲对中国电动汽车及其他出口产品涌入的愤怒日益增加——北京方面似乎不愿改变方向。

中国面临的一个挑战是无利可图的公司承担了巨额债务,随着整体增长停滞,其中大部分债务无法轻易偿还。削减向此类公司提供新信贷的努力可能会使中国国有银行面临巨额损失。

“如果你想改变这个系统,就必须接受大量损失,我认为中国政府还没有准备好这样做,”研究机构 Rhodium Group 的副总监 Camille Boullemois 表示。“最可能的情况是,情况将继续缓慢恶化,金融系统会出现某种缓慢的衰败,在产生增长方面变得越来越低效。”

通过将债务问题推迟处理,这也让习近平能够继续专注于投资新技术、军事和其他战略重点。中国官员认为现在有一个机会窗口,可以将中国牢固地确立为与美国并列的大国,并认为在人工智能、空间技术和能源等核心技术领域的投资至关重要。

中国政府表示其债务处于可控状态。近年来,中央政府的借款仅占 GDP 的 $30 左右,与美国的联邦债务相比规模较小。

但这并未涵盖中国问题的主要部分,因为问题集中在地方层面。

特别是,与地方政府挂钩的融资平台公司在过去几年中积累了数万亿美元的新负债,因为它们试图通过创造足够的业务来达成经济增长目标,并维持城市人口的就业。许多此类公司参与了当地的房地产开发,并受到中国多年房地产崩盘的沉重打击。

根据国际货币基金组织的数据,一个衡量中国政府整体债务的更广泛指标——包括官方地方政府借款以及这些地方政府融资平台的债务——去年已膨胀至 GDP 的估计 127%,高于 2020 年的 98%。

尽管中国官员表示他们倾向于坚持目前的路线,但总部位于柏林的智库墨卡托中国研究所在经济与工业项目负责人雅各布·冈特(Jacob Gunter)表示:“我们看到该系统正陷入某些极限之中。”

“地方政府正在通过补贴亏损企业以维持其生存,”冈特说,“但这些企业处于亏损状态这一事实,也意味着没有利润可供征税。”

英国

---

罗素·布兰德强奸案审判开始

英国喜剧演员兼演员罗素·布兰德(Russell Brand)周一出现在伦敦的一家法院,开始接受强奸和性侵指控的审判。

在经过一个上午的陪审团筛选后,听证会推迟至周二举行。

现年 51 岁的布兰德对三项强奸罪、三项性侵罪和一项猥亵罪指控均表示不认罪。这些指控涉及六名女性,涉嫌犯罪时间在 1999 年至 2009 年之间。

检察官在之前的听证会上表示,布兰德被指控在工党会议期间于酒店房间内强奸一名女性,在洗手间内抓揉一名电视工作人员的乳房并强迫其进行性行为,以及亲吻并摸索一名广播电台员工。

——美联社

---

平壤测试弹道导弹

韩国军方表示,朝鲜周一向其东部海域发射了数枚弹道导弹。在外交陷入僵局之际,近期的一系列武器演示进一步加剧了紧张局势。

韩国联合参谋本部的发言人张道英(Jang Do-young)表示,导弹是从朝鲜首都平壤周边地区发射的,近年来该国的主要机场一直是主要的发射点。

张道英表示,其中一枚导弹在落海前飞行了 560 英里以上,但他未对其他武器的飞行细节发表评论。联合参谋本部未具体说明检测到了多少枚导弹。

英国

---

伯纳姆:伊朗可能是袭击幕后主使

英国首相安迪·伯纳姆(Andy Burnham)周一表示,一起涉嫌袭击英国境内美国运营的军事空军基地的阴谋“几乎肯定”是由伊朗革命卫队指使的。

他此前曾表示,有强有力迹象表明,伊朗与上个月企图袭击费尔福德皇家空军基地(RAF Fairford)的计划有关。在持续的战争中,美国轰炸机一直利用该基地对伊朗发动袭击。

警方已逮捕七名男子,但所有嫌疑人均已保释,且无人被起诉。伊朗否认参与其中。

“我可以确认我们的评估结果,即此次行动极有可能是由伊朗协调,且几乎肯定是由伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队指使的,”伯纳姆说道。

——美联社

世界观察

照亮前路:周一,教徒们在巴西的阿帕雷西达国家圣母圣殿庆祝阿帕雷西达圣母瞻礼。

RECORDATI 所有股份的自愿公开收购要约

我们认可共同旅程的价值。

如今,即便您已经接受了该要约,该要约的价值也更高了。

每股要约价格,

保证以现金支付 \*\*。

€53

较 2026 年 3 月 25 日记录的官方股价高出 16.61% 的“溢价”\*\*\*

如果您是 Recordati 的股东,请接受该要约。

接受期限延长至 10 月 23 日\*\*\*\*。

如欲接受该要约,请仔细阅读要约文件和发行人声明,并联系您的银行、财务顾问或投资经理\*。

在 100 多年之后,得益于那些参与其成长的人们,Recordati 的旅程仍在继续。

请接受由 Respighi BidCo S.p.A. 发起的自愿收购要约——该公司由 CVC Capital Partners IX Aggregator SCA SICAV-RAIF 和 Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA 间接参股——旨在以每股 €53\*\* 的要约价格收购所有 Recordati 普通股,为接受要约的股东提供较 2026 年 3 月 25 日股票官方价格 16.61% 的溢价。

CVC GBL

促销通讯。在接受仅在意大利发起并根据 1934 年美国《证券交易法》第 14(a) 条扩展至美国的自愿公开收购要约之前,请仔细阅读完整的要约文件,以及由要约人准备的意大利语摘要、随附于要约文件的发行人声明以及与该要约相关的其他文件,这些文件可通过发行人网站 (www.recordati.com) 和全球信息代理网站 (https: / transactions.sodali.com) 等渠道获取。本通讯不构成投资建议或接受自愿公开收购要约的推荐,也不取代投资者对交易价值的自行评估。信息渠道在整个接受期间开放,周一

至周五,从 06:00 (CET) 到 28:00 (CET),免费电话 800 126 352(来自意大利陆线电话',直拨线 - 30 169 / 287 / 0-70),如需了解该期间的进一步信息,将需要通过此渠道。以下文件由:Per paper 发布。\*\*要约价格根据由:于 2026 年 10 月 6 日发布的公告而定,据此提高了要约价格并延长了要约的接受期限。为避免重复,在 2026 年 10 月 6 日之前已将股份提交给该要约的股东,若要约成功完成,也将有权获得要约价格(每股 53.00 欧元)。\*\*\* 基于要约价格(每股 53.00 欧元)计算,并加上公司于 2026 年 5 月 20 日支付的 2025 年股息余额(每股 0.71 欧元)作为剩余时间。

\*\*\*\* 接受期限为 2026 年 8 月 31 日至 2026 年 10 月 23 日(含),且须符合适用法律关于条款重新开放的任何规定。

伊朗准备应对美国威胁

(接第一页)

“在外交、经济和政治方面,”伦敦查塔姆研究所(Chatham House)中东主任萨南·瓦基尔(Sanam Vakil)表示,“通过一场新的战争,伊斯兰共和国或许能让自己走出其亲手挖掘的死胡同。”

据知情人士透露,为了威慑潜在的攻击,一些伊朗官员暗示其军队可能会对邻国发动陆地入侵。该国最高国家安全官员穆赫森·雷扎伊(Mohsen Rezaei)周日表示,德黑兰可能会将目标指向阿拉伯联合酋长国(自春季末以来该国基本未遭到攻击),以及该地区的数据中心和互联网电缆。

一些知情人士表示,德黑兰还单独警告阿拉伯国家官员,如果冲突重启,它可能会打击地区目标,包括沙特的石油设施。这将增加沙特阿拉伯面临的威胁,此前伊朗支持的也门胡塞武装在周末袭击了沙特首都的国际机场。

美国军方本身也在为可能重启的战斗做准备。《华尔街日报》此前报道,第三个航母打击群和另一个海军陆战队远征部队正驶向中东,五角大楼正在考虑向该地区的基地派遣额外的防空设备和弹药。

尽管特朗普总统上周排除了在11月3日中期选举前发动攻击的可能性,但他此前也公开考虑打击伊朗的Pickaxe Mountain核设施,美国官员表示军方正在为新一轮打击准备一系列方案。共和党人特朗普在周末表示,美国正与胡塞武装保持沟通,但可能会加入沙特对该武装组织的打击。总统在周六晚上提到对利雅得机场的致命袭击时说:“他们的所作所为非常糟糕。”

双方加强战斗能力的努力凸显出,在战争进入七个多月后,双方都觉得没有必要放弃这场基本陷入僵局的战斗。美国加强了经济压力攻势,并日益成功地引导油轮通过霍尔木兹海峡。

伊朗则加强了对波斯湾地区船只的袭击。根据隶属于英国皇家海军的英国海事贸易行动中心(U.K. Maritime Trade Operations)的数据,周末在海峡及其周边地区至少有三艘商船遭到袭击。周日,一次无人机袭击在阿曼附近的一艘阿联酋油轮“Petro Dolphin”号上引发火灾,导致两名印度船员失踪。

---

双方均不倾向于放弃这场基本处于僵局的战斗。

周六,胡塞武装对利雅得机场发动的导弹袭击造成至少 13 人死亡,数百人受伤。这是在与伊朗战争相关的冲突中,针对美国及其海湾盟友最致命的 1 次单一袭击。

这些袭击凸显了如果特朗普决定恢复战斗,该地区主要经济目标的脆弱性。

一些知情人士表示,伊朗政府还告知调解人员,它将更积极地针对美国人员,包括尝试击沉美国在中东的军舰并杀死其船员。

在 9 月的袭击中,伊朗导弹曾接近美国军舰。由于担心伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队计划发动无人机袭击,五角大楼上周将 12 架 B-1 轰炸机从英国军事基地移走。

《华尔街日报》此前报道,自特朗普在 7 月下旬取消大规模升级计划以来,美国与伊朗之间的直接战斗基本处于停滞状态,部分原因是担心防御该地区各目标所需的导弹拦截器供应不足。

伊朗利用这段停战期重建其导弹和无人机设施并补充军械库。伊朗最高领袖穆贾塔巴·哈梅内伊在 9 月初由革命卫队相关媒体发布的评论中赞扬了这项工作,但承认供应链存在困难。

伊朗还加强了对其核设施和其他安全相关掩体的保护。根据总部位于华盛顿特区的非营利组织“科学与国际安全研究所”分析的 Vantor 卫星图像,上个月,伊朗在其 Pickaxe Mountain 和纳坦兹(Natanz)核设施周围建立了临时土堆等被动防御措施,以阻碍地面部队的任何袭击企图。

伊朗官员正在宣传他们的努力。负责该国应急计划的准将古拉姆雷扎·贾拉利(Gholamreza Jalali)在 9 月底表示,该国的机场、海港和发电厂“已为战时状态做好准备”,安装了掩体和备份供应,以便在危机中继续运行。

国家媒体还在每天播报支持政权的集会。伊朗居民表示,近几周人群规模有所增加,且分布在更多地点。

德黑兰的广告牌现在正在宣传关于使用肩扛式防空导弹和狙击步枪的平民培训课程。

根据伊朗巴斯基(Basij)志愿防御部队精锐单位 Fatehin 发布的一段视频,革命卫队上个月吹嘘其已培训首批女性突击队,学习游击战术、枪械使用和无人机驾驶。

根据革命卫队地面部队的社交媒体账号,在伊朗东北部城市萨布泽瓦尔(Sabzevar),一支革命卫队单位访问了一所幼儿园,向孩子们讲述今年的战斗故事,并展示了一枚该单位称已将其拦截的美国“战斧”导弹。

华盛顿智库“民主防御基金会”伊朗项目高级主任贝纳姆·本·塔莱布卢(Behnam Ben Taleblu)表示:“无论在言论还是行动上,伊斯兰共和国都在积极为下一场战争做准备。”

情报并非优势,如何利用情报才是。

每支领导团队都面临着三个相互关联的问题:

我们现在应该如何运作?

我们如何更快地做出更好的决策?

我们的下一阶段增长将从哪里来?

大多数企业将这些问题分散在不同的团队、工具和合作伙伴之间。

随后,他们投入时间、金钱和动力将这些答案重新整合在一起。

PMG 的建立正是为了将它们连接起来。

我们的人才提供判断力。我们的运营模式将决策从战略贯穿至执行。而我们的专有操作系统 Alli,则将每一项决策与接下来的行动相连接。

一个负责的团队。一个连接的系统。

从第一个问题到最终的业务成果。

更智能地运作。更快速地决策。实现增长。

2025年欧洲各国国防开支占GDP的比重

俄罗斯袭击乌克兰电力基础设施

作者:ANASTASIIA MALENKO

乌克兰基辅——乌克兰总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基表示,在特朗普总统宣布交战双方达成能源停火协议数小时后,俄罗斯的袭击击中了其全国各地的能源基础设施。

俄罗斯的袭击(包括针对天然气基础设施、一座发电厂和一座变电站)发生之际,美国正向乌克兰施压,要求其停止袭击俄罗斯炼油厂;此前,特朗普已采取行动允许俄罗斯向美国出口柴油,旨在降低美国的加油站油价。

“昨晚,俄罗斯的炼油厂没有起火。但在午夜,一架俄罗斯喷气式 Shahed 无人机袭击了乌克兰的一处天然气生产设施,”泽连斯基在周一向华沙安全论坛发表的演讲中说道。“此外,俄罗斯还对一家普通加油站发动了袭击,涉及多架无人机。”

乌克兰长期以来一直主张,如果莫斯科停止对乌克兰能源基础设施的轰炸行动(该行动已导致今年秋季出现大规模停电),乌克兰将准备停止对俄罗斯石油设施的无人机和导弹袭击。

泽连斯基在周一重申了这一承诺,并补充说欧洲及其他国家领导人支持这一方案。

他说:“如果俄罗斯希望我们停止对其炼油厂和石油出口的远程袭击,那么俄罗斯必须停止对其能源系统和关键基础设施的袭击。并且停止杀害我们的人民。”

据俄罗斯国家通讯社塔斯社报道,克里姆林宫发言人德米特里·佩斯科夫周一表示,由于接触仍在继续,他无法就宣布的能源停火发表任何评论。

乌克兰国家石油天然气公司 Naftogaz 表示,在周一凌晨,俄罗斯的一次喷气式无人机袭击损坏了哈尔科夫地区一个天然气基础设施设施的设备。

乌克兰外交部长安德里·西比哈在卢森堡举行的欧盟外交部长会议上告诉记者,另一次袭击损坏了日托米尔北部地区的一座电力变电站。

“不应该有人相信普京的话。相反,请看他的行动,”西比哈说道,并重申乌克兰准备达成互惠的能源停战。

为了引起美国决策者对其所谓的俄罗斯违约行为的关注,泽连斯基表示,如果美国介入以确保莫斯科遵守协议,有效的能源停火将成为“结束战争的重要一步”。

特朗普对乌克兰针对俄罗斯炼油厂的行动以及持续的战争表示沮丧,并呼吁更换泽连斯基的领导地位。

“我认为乌克兰是时候换一位新总统了,”特朗普周六告诉记者,他将俄罗斯在 2022 年发起的冲突以及基辅的空袭归咎于泽连斯基,并认为这是导致美国及全球柴油价格高企的原因。

根据大宗商品追踪服务公司 Kpler 的数据,在今年美国与伊朗爆发战争之前,中东是全球最大的柴油出口地,去年占全球出口额的 $19\%$。北美市场份额为 $15\%$,俄罗斯以 $11\%$ 位居第三大供应商。

来自波斯湾国家的柴油运输中断,以及胡塞武装对沙特阿拉伯红海炼油厂的袭击,也导致了价格上涨。

一名男子在俄罗斯空袭导致其妻子在哈尔科夫一个住宅区丧生后悲痛不已。

---

欧盟对近 1,600 名俄罗斯个人及企业实施制裁

欧盟周一对近 1,600 名俄罗斯个人以及与莫斯科军工产业相关的公司实施了制裁,目标是那些涉嫌参与制造无人机和导弹零部件的人员。

在自 2022 年入侵乌克兰以来最大规模的单次制裁名单中,欧盟还针对 77 名被指控在被占领的乌克兰部分地区组织、参与或运行“虚假选举”的人员。

欧盟外交政策负责人卡娅·卡拉斯(Kaja Kallas)在宣布制裁时表示,其中超过一半的制裁对象“针对的是俄罗斯每天用来杀害乌克兰平民的弹道导弹生产链”。

她说:“现在不是减轻对莫斯科压力的时刻,而是应该增加压力。”

欧盟表示,这些公司被列入由俄罗斯政府本身建立的一份名单中,“该名单将其定义为属于俄罗斯军工复合体,因此有权获得补贴”。欧盟认为,管理这些公司的官员是在“支持俄罗斯的军事和工业复合体”。欧盟表示,制裁旨在针对“代表俄罗斯军事工业‘核心’的中级供应商”。

—美联社

饥饿的乌克兰人冒死逃离前线城镇

在华沙的美国大使馆外,抗议者谴责俄罗斯占领下的奥莱什基(Oleshky)所面临的人道主义危机。

作者:NIKITA NIKOLAIENKO 和 IAN LOVETT

在俄罗斯占领的城市奥莱什基近两个月没有食物供应后,玛丽亚·扎哈夫科(Maria Zakhavko)决定她和丈夫必须离开。

在出发之前,他们将收集到的食物留给了扎哈夫科年迈的父母。她的父母身体太虚弱,无法在布满地雷和尸体的道路上徒步行走12英里前往下一个城镇。他们只能等待撤离——如果撤离真的会到来的话。

“很快再见,”扎哈夫科回忆道,当时她语气中带着希望。8月17日,她和丈夫开始了这段通往安全地带的漫长旅程的第一阶段,他们深知并非每个人都能安全抵达。

奥莱什基曾是第聂伯河南岸一座拥有24,000人口的城市,而现在它处于一场人道主义危机的中心。

全年以来,由于地雷和无人机导致道路无法通行,奥莱什基与外界的联系被切断,食物供应日益匮乏。最后一批运送食物的志愿者是在5月抵达的。居民们表示,此后有几辆车触雷,志愿者便不再来了。

通过电话与居民保持联系的乌克兰官员表示,大约有2,000名平民实际上被困在奥莱什基。自2022年入侵之初,该市就一直处于俄罗斯的控制之下。

剩余的居民依靠自己种植的蔬菜、煮杂草熬成的汤,以及从废弃房屋中搜寻到的罐头食品生存。有些人会定期进行一次令人心惊胆战的往返25英里旅程,深入俄罗斯领土前往拉登斯克(Radensk),那是他们能买到物资的最近城镇。这条路汽车无法通行,但可以通过步行或骑自行车通过——尽管风险极大。

乌克兰军队偶尔会通过无人机从河对岸运送食物和其他物资,但乌克兰官员表示,俄罗斯军队有时会拦截这些包裹,或惩罚那些被发现接收物资的人。已经离开该地的居民说,俄罗斯军队还会搬进当地人的公寓,吃掉他们发现的所有东西。

“俄罗斯人基本上是在将这些平民当作人体盾牌,”乌克兰赫尔松州军事行政当局副主管奥列克桑德尔·托洛孔尼科夫(Oleksandr Tolokonnikov)表示。“通过将平民留在身后,他们更容易炮击我们所在的河岸。他们甚至不给平民喂食——是我们自己在发送食物,并冒着损失无人机的风险。”他说,每架用于运送食物的无人机成本约为$22,000。

在给《华尔街日报》的一封电子邮件中,克里姆林宫表示,奥莱什基只有200名平民,且乌克兰在阻止他们离开并封锁食物和水的供应。“俄罗斯军队继续在那里运送物资。”

奥莱什基位于赫尔松对岸的第聂伯河边,在被占领的大部分时间里,生活都极其艰难。2023年,俄罗斯人炸毁了一座附近的大坝,导致该市大部分地区被淹没,并将地雷和其他弹药冲入居民区。

俄罗斯军队进入该市,乌克兰军队对其进行炮击。电力、水和天然气被切断。大多数居民离开了。那些留下的人(大多是老年人)习惯了在院子里用明火做饭,以及听着头顶上无人机的嗡嗡声。

去年冬天,随着敢于冒险运送物资的志愿者减少,食物开始短缺。在小市场里,价格飞涨——居民称,一打鸡蛋要$17。在志愿者停止到来后,寻找食物变得愈发绝望。

50岁的奥莱娜·索洛维约娃(Olena Solovyova)说,她住在奥莱什基的父亲去年冬天搬到了邻居家——他的房子没有柴火炉,因此在天然气被切断后无法取暖。

她说,由于夏季食物短缺,他决定骑自行车前往拉登斯克(Radensk)。他修理好自行车,并与一群熟悉路线的人一同出发。回程花费了六个小时,因为他背着70磅的食物步行——尽管当时买不到肉类。

“他说整个过程中头顶一直有无人机在飞,”索洛维约娃说。她说,此后该道路上的地雷分布更加密集,几名在9月份尝试前往该地的居民被炸身亡。目前尚不清楚地雷是由乌克兰军队还是俄罗斯军队布设的。

自上周以来,乌克兰军队通过无人机交付了大约10吨的食物和其他物资。

奥莱什基(Oleshky)市军事行政当局负责人塔蒂亚娜·哈萨年科(Tetiana Hasanenko)驻扎在乌克兰控制区,她表示,这些任务事先并未公布,但官员们私下向部分居民发送消息,告知物资即将送达。此前,俄罗斯军队曾试图拦截这些无人机。

奥莱什基的医院仍然开放,但缺乏药品和其他物资。

索洛维约娃说,她的一位仍留在奥莱什基的前任教师在9月份被弹片击伤。她被送往医院,但医生缺乏止血物资,最终不得不截肢。“地下室里堆满了尸体,”她在谈到这家医院时说道。

扎哈夫科和她的丈夫是最近成功安全离开奥莱什基的居民之一。“我现在时刻担心我的父母,”她说,“那里有数百人根本无法离开。”

北约军事首脑阐明旨在挫败莫斯科的计划

2021年3月至2026年9月期间报告的与俄罗斯相关的事件

\- 无人机 / 领空入侵

  • 破坏活动
  • 间谍活动
  • 网络攻击 / 电子战
  • 北约成员国

\*卢森堡的国防支出计算为国民总收入的百分比。

来源:欧洲政策分析中心(事件);

EDA国防数据门户(支出) DANIEL KISS / WSJ

北约最高军事指挥官周一试图安抚焦虑的欧洲,概述了该联盟的新军事计划,旨在通过结合火力、自主系统和传感器,借鉴乌克兰的经验,挫败俄罗斯在其东翼可能发起的袭击。

---

作者:迈克尔·R·戈登 (Michael R. Gordon)、罗比·格拉默 (Robbie Gramer) 和 丹尼尔·迈克尔斯 (Daniel Michaels)

亚历克斯·格林克维奇 (Alexus Grynkewich) 将军关于北大西洋公约组织 (NATO) “胜利理论”的演讲概述了一系列步骤,旨在拦截初步攻击;如果侵略继续,则破坏对手控制和支持其部队的能力。

其目标是在将敌方完全摧毁之前及时停止,从而在遏制入侵的同时,最大限度地降低常规战争或核升级的风险。

在华沙安全论坛发表讲话后,格林克维奇在台上表示,他提出这一战略既是为了安抚因俄罗斯侵略而感到不安的欧洲人,也是为了向那些“足够愚蠢到试图攻击我们领土的人”传递一个信号。

格林克维奇是一名美国空军将军,同时担任美国驻欧部队负责人和北约最高指挥官。他在波兰发表了这次演讲。随着乌克兰冲突进入第五年,波兰作为美国的盟友,一直对俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京 (Vladimir Putin) 对欧洲的意图感到担忧。

虽然格林克维奇概述了他对莫斯科(他在演讲中未点名)的含蓄警告,但特朗普总统周末的言论令欧洲盟友和美国立法者感到震惊。

“概述军事计划很重要,但这不能脱离大家所担忧的问题:特朗普的爆发式言论、俄罗斯对乌克兰的战争及其对欧洲的威胁,以及关于我们是否将从欧洲撤出大量美军的疑问,”曾在第一任特朗普政府期间担任美国驻北约、随后担任美国驻乌克兰特使的库尔特·沃尔克 (Kurt Volker) 表示。

一些共和党立法者批评特朗普在周末宣布的一项进口俄罗斯柴油的协议,警告称这在未能显著降低美国能源价格的情况下,向莫斯科提供了资金援助。在特朗普宣布俄罗斯与乌克兰之间的能源停火后不久,俄罗斯军队袭击了乌克兰城市哈尔科夫的一座发电厂。

格林克维奇需要提供这种安抚,标志着这个曾经认为自己赢得了冷战并收获了“和平红利”的联盟发生了转变。相反,北约现在面对的是一个好战的俄罗斯,它入侵了乌克兰,利用无人机渗透西方领空,并被怀疑在欧洲对基础设施、军事设备和国防公司发动破坏袭击。

一名德国情报高级官员最近将此称为“影子战争”,这令西方官员感到不安。他们一直难以制定出有效策略来威慑俄罗斯的混合战争,并正准备防御针对北约波罗的海成员国及其东部前沿可能发起的更大规模攻击。

格林克维奇表示,其计划的机密版本已于 3 个月前最终确定,该计划要求投资于“可负担的大规模量产”(affordable mass),这指的是乌克兰用来补充联盟先进武器库的相对廉价的无人机。

如果俄罗斯发动攻击,联盟的首要目标将是拦截初步袭击,并在攻击持续的情况下防止其推进。在执行该战略时,这位北约指挥官表示,联盟并不寻求击败俄罗斯或削弱其政府。他说:“我们并不寻求让对手遭受战略性失败,而仅仅是寻求在原地停止任何攻击。”

格林克维奇没有提供加强防御的时间表。北约的这些努力是在欧洲面临美国 PAC-3 爱国者防空拦截弹和 Atacms 地对地导弹弹药短缺的背景下进行的,因为美国弹药已被分流至中东以应对伊朗。

北约的“胜利理论”借鉴了退役将军克里斯·多纳休 (Chris Donahue) 的努力,他曾任美国陆军驻欧指挥官兼北约陆军司令部负责人,在国防部长皮特·海格塞斯 (Pete Hegseth) 降低其职位级别后,他于 7 月被迫离职。

在其战略下,将建立一个“自治区”,以便无人机和地面机器人能够在不造成大规模盟军伤亡的情况下,削弱俄罗斯的进攻。

与此同时,远程导弹将打击俄罗斯位于加里宁格勒飞地、圣彼得堡附近以及白俄罗斯境内的指挥所和防空设施。这将击穿俄罗斯控制天空的企图,并使美国陆军第五军及其他北约地面部队能够发起反击。

北约空军将采取行动,打击向战场集结的俄罗斯增援部队,并攻击后方的其他目标。

一些资深官员赞扬了北约更新战略的努力,但表示该联盟面临的考验将在于是否愿意投入资源将其全面落实。

“北约完成了这次调整是很棒的,但他们必须加快速度。各国必须提供资金和政治意愿来实现这一点,”曾在奥巴马政府期间担任负责欧洲和北约的国防部助理部长助理的吉姆·汤森(Jim Townsend)表示。“北约作为一个机构可以进行规划,但最终必须由成员国回到国内,投入资金并训练部队。”

来自 #1 《纽约时报》畅销书作者的新作

布莱恩·基尔米德 (BRIAN KILMEADE)

六个时刻。

一个奇迹。

历经 250 年铸就。

“布莱恩·基尔米德为我们提供了一个聚焦于建国之父的《勇气剖析》变奏曲……这六个人帮助统一了我们的国家,并建立了我们追求更完美联邦的叙事。”

——《埃隆·马斯克》作者,纽约时报畅销书榜第一名

“迷人,引人入胜,扣人心弦;这就是历史应有的样子!……它提醒我们,伟大美国人的品质始终在闪光——且永远将如此。”

——美国海军退役上将,《整理你的床铺》作者,纽约时报畅销书榜第一名

“《统一美国》将激励你,向你展示平凡之人成就非凡之事的能量。”

——《肯尼迪阴谋》畅销书榜第一名作者

纽约时报畅销书榜第一名作者 / 纽约时报畅销书榜第一名

布莱恩·基尔米德 (BRIAN KILMEADE)

《统一美国》

(UNITING the STATES)

铸就美国奇迹的六个关键时刻

现已在各大书店上市

在 HC.com 探索优秀书籍、独家优惠及更多内容

WM MORROW

哈珀柯林斯出版公司 (HarperCollins Publishers) 旗下品牌

委内瑞拉深思石油未来

(接第一页)委内瑞拉的石油部门将是一项耗资数千亿美元的长期工程。

在马杜罗被推翻十个月后,流入的投资寥寥无几。自今年1月以来,国家石油产量一直维持在每日100万桶略上方;在2020年美国制裁开始产生影响后,该产量曾跌至每日500,000桶,但仍远低于20世纪90年代后期每日超过320 万桶的产量。

美国官员表示,变革即将到来。在近期于委内瑞拉首都加拉加斯举行的一场外资投资者大会上,美国大使馆副馆长迈克尔·加西亚(Michael Garcia)指出,涉及雪佛龙(Chevron)和电力设备公司GE Vernova的交易证明,一个与

此次会议是委内瑞拉在经历多年经济孤立和美国制裁后重新开放的一系列活动之一,吸引了来自国际能源公司的650多位高管参加。

对于一个拥有全球最大规模油气储量之国家所蕴含的商业潜力,几乎没有异议。“委内瑞拉拥有的‘皇冠上的明珠’比伦敦塔还要多,”德克萨斯州独立油气开发商Hunt Energy的首席执行官亨特·亨特(Hunter Hunt)表示。

马杜罗的前副手、代理总统德尔西·罗德里格斯(Delcy Rodríguez)正在振兴石油部门并加固不稳定的国家电网。“真正的挑战依然存在,”加西亚说,“但方向是明确的。”

在为期三天的会议上,与会专家被要求将讨论限制在技术层面且不涉及政治,因此委内瑞拉的政治未来未被提及。民调显示,人们对罗德里格斯未经选举的临时政府的不满日益增加,这可能成为长期投资的潜在障碍。近几周,全国范围内爆发了小规模抗议活动,示威者封锁道路要求举行选举。

一座倒塌的输电塔压在委内瑞拉卡比马斯(Cabimas)马拉开波湖的一台停用抽油机上。

与会高管列举了提高产量的挑战:停电、经验丰富的承包商匮乏,以及在应对复杂的美国制裁网的同时获取项目融资的困难。能源服务公司SLB(原名斯伦贝谢)的墨西哥、中美洲及委内瑞拉区总经理威廉·安东尼奥(William Antonio)表示,在经历了近八年的国际黑名单限制导致新技术无法进入后,该国30,000口油井中仅有三分之一在运行。

美国投资者重返委内瑞拉也唤醒了旧有的政治积怨。马克思主义者、委内瑞拉政府前首席经济规划师豪尔赫·乔尔达尼(Jorge Giordani)在加拉加斯的一次左翼活动人士集会上表示,资本家正试图窃取“魔鬼的排泄物”——这指的是该国长期被视为既是祝福也是诅咒的巨额石油财富。

“他们回来了,”这位86岁的老人说,“而他们只对一件事感兴趣:我们的碳氢化合物。”

卢西拉·纳瓦(Lucila Nava)是一位退休秘书,她的父亲曾在壳牌公司工作40年,她住在马拉开波湖附近。她表示,在外国公司获得利润丰厚的合同时,美国支持罗德里格斯并维持马杜罗的独裁政府,这让她感到沮丧。

“当特朗普(President Trump)除掉马杜罗时,我们很喜欢他,”纳瓦说,“但你不能就这样抢走石油。我们明白,美国是世界上最强大的国家,但这并不意味着你们有权这样做。”

高管们希望“棕地”(brownfields,即成熟油田的称呼)能够迅速恢复活力。由委内瑞拉私营公司North American Blue Energy Partners与五角大楼合资近期收购的17个油区中,有几个也位于此处。

人们试图利用石油工业残存的资源想方设法生存。在卡比马斯,一群邻居从一台抽油机中抽取天然气并将其通过管道引入厨房。有时,原油会通过简陋的管道渗出,将黑色黏液带入厨房。

保安埃尔莫·金特罗(Elmo Quintero)表示,他曾希望在马杜罗被推翻后,他在哥伦比亚的三个孩子能够回家,而且破败的医疗系统能够得到改善。这位 65 岁的糖尿病患者说,他买不起胰岛素,当地诊所也很少有注射器。他用一种草药茶自行治疗。

金特罗在自家砖房旁的一个庭院里,帮国家石油公司——委内瑞拉国家石油公司(Petróleos de Venezuela)维护一台生锈的抽油机。他的鸡群在管道之间觅食。每三个月只有两天的供水服务。在他说话时,身后的抽油机戛然而止——又一次停电。他怀疑自己有生之年是否能看到改善。

“我更多是在为我的孙辈考虑,”金特罗说。

膨胀的英国福利支出

如果不包括医疗保健,英国今年在各类针对病患和残障人士的福利补贴上的支出将超过 1000 亿英镑 billion,比国防开支高出约三分之一。根据政府的财政预测,这笔账单在短短四年内激增了四分之一,并有望在未来四年达到 1300 亿英镑 billion。

目前约有 700万 人——超过人口的 10%——领取一项或多项疾病或残障补贴。在应当为经济提供动力的劳动年龄人口中,这一数字增长最快,在过去六年里从 2019 年的 290 万 激增至 470 万,增幅超过 60%。

(接第一页)

许多较新的残障申请是针对心理健康问题的,而这类问题政府更难核实。

按选定类型划分的获得个人独立支付金(PIP)的英国人总数 $^{†}$

英国的借贷成本高于七国集团(G7)中的任何国家,近期达到了 2008 年金融危机以来的最高水平。富裕英国人的缓慢但持续的流出表明,政府不断提高税收负担的做法是有极限的,而目前的税负已处于二战以来的最高水平。

有一项旨在帮助残障人士提高流动性的福利,允许领取者放弃部分现金补贴,以换取每三年租赁一辆新车的资格。目前,这在英国新车销售中约占七分之一。根据政府数据,在去年获得新车的人员中:有 40 人的主要医疗状况是网球肘,50 人是对小麦不耐受,320 人患有阅读障碍。

英国基金管理公司 Rathbones 的多资产投资主管大卫·库姆斯(David Coombs)表示,福利支出的激增“在任何层面上显然都是不可持续的”,“这确实是目前最重大的问题”。

G-7 国家 10 年期政府债券当前收益率\*\*

英国 10 年期债券的借贷成本已从年初的 $4.5\%$ 上升至 $5.5\%$,这为该国增加了数十亿英镑的

英国针对残障人士及健康状况不佳人士的福利支出,按年龄组划分 $^{4}$

这也是西方国家面临的一个紧迫问题的试金石:政治领导人是否有可能遏制不断扩张的福利国家的支出?到目前为止,答案似乎是否定的,这增加了像英国这样的国家正逐步走向财务清算的可能性。

英国 10 年期政府债券收益率\*\*

英国与其欧洲同行一样,陷入了恶性循环。由于人口老龄化、国防需求增加、昂贵的绿色能源转型以及不断攀升的福利和债务利息账单,其支出正在激增。但由于经济增长疲软,其收入基本持平。

政府提高了税收并过度依赖债务,自疫情以来额外借款 £1 trillion。这一策略已走到了尽头。

这种规模的支出已演变成一场丑闻。没有其他西方国家出现过如此剧烈的残障申请增长。

\*名义值;财政年度于 3 月 31 日结束;£1=\$1.32 †累计数据 \*数据涵盖针对残障人士、健康状况不佳人士及其护理人员的福利支出 \*\*截至东部时间周五上午 5:30 来源:工作和养老金部(支出、支付、费用);Tullett Prebon(收益率)

---

“不可持续”

2025年,时任英国首相基尔·斯塔默(Keir Starmer)宣布计划收紧病假和残疾福利的资格要求,旨在到2030年每年削减50 亿英镑 billion的政府支出。

由此引发的强烈抵制导致斯塔默放弃了削减计划。投资者担心一个拥有绝对多数席位的政府竟然无法推动此类改革,随即抛售政府债券,英镑大幅下跌,财政大臣在议会中落泪。

斯塔默随后被工党抛弃,并在今年夏天由极具电视形象的安迪·伯纳姆(Andy Burnham)接替。伯纳姆同样承诺处理福利问题,但并非通过他所谓的“粗暴削减”。

但在整个欧洲,试图改变社会安全网的尝试被证明在政治上是有毒的。在法国,削减福利支出的尝试导致国民议会罢免了两任前任总理。在德国通过了一些关于失业和医疗福利的温和调整后,愤怒的选民惩罚了执政的中右翼政党。

运行成本。英国为其债务支付的成本比挥霍无度的法国或像希腊这样的历史性破产国家还要高。

英国的青年失业率曾处于欧洲中游水平。到去年,只有罗马尼亚记录到的不就业、不教育也不接受培训的青年比例更高。“我认为人们缺乏对英国一些最弱势群体技能匮乏程度的认识,事实上,投资于他们的技能培训比单纯提供福利会让我们受益得多,”英国社会流动委员会(一个独立机构)主席阿伦·弗朗西斯(Alun Francis)表示。

伯纳姆将在本月晚些时候公布他的首份预算案,外界普遍预计其中将包含新一轮的加税,这可能会

在整个欧盟,政府福利支出已从20世纪60年代初仅占经济产出的10%稳步增长到如今的平均27%,而美国的这一比例约为21%。

视频,”他说。

政府官员正在考虑收紧年轻人领取福利资格的方法,转而资助额外的培训以帮助他们就业。就业与养老金部表示,将额外投入35 亿英镑 billion用于帮助残疾人士就业。

英国的残疾和病假津贴表明该系统是如何扩张的。

---

职能蔓延

英国战后的政府引入残疾津贴,旨在帮助抵消工资损失,例如一名在工业事故中失去一只手的工人。但随着时间的推移,该体系演变成了一套极其复杂的项目组合。其中一些项目针对的是因病无法工作的人员;另一些则更为广泛:个人独立支付金(PIP)是一项现金补贴,面向任何——无论贫富、无论是否在职——患有疾病或残疾的人,以帮助支付更高的生活成本。

当该津贴的前身在 20 世纪 90 年代创建时,政府认为申请人数将在几十万人左右。而如今,每 12 人中就有 1 人在领取残疾支票。该计划目前覆盖了患有各种身体和心理健康问题的人群,包括焦虑症、多动症(ADHD)、抑郁症甚至痤疮。

“这里的人不工作是因为他们可以领取 PIP,所以他们就整天闲坐着,吸毒喝酒,”65岁的斯蒂芬·沃克(Stephen Walker)在近日漫步于沃尔顿(Walton)时说道,“这不公平。”

牛津大学财政问题专家保罗·约翰逊(Paul Johnson)表示,该体系正在做一些它最初并非旨在完成的事情。

在贫困地区,尤其是前工业中心,大量居民依赖福利。在利物浦郊区的沃尔顿,大约每 2 户家庭中就有 1 户申请福利,每 5 名适龄劳动人口中就有 1 人申请 PIP。

他承认有些人确实需要帮助——包括他的三个孙辈。但他表示,太多人将其用于增加收入。

“我认为人们普遍同意,目前的体系在执行一些它原本不打算做的事情,”他说道。得益于住房补贴和每月约 £650 的失业救济金。

慈善机构表示,对于那些面对食品和取暖成本飙升的人来说,福利金是一种救济。利物浦公民咨询中心(Citizens Advice Liverpool)运营发展负责人米克·布莱克利(Mick Blakeley)表示:“人们不会直接走进来就说,‘哦,太棒了,我被诊断出患有 ADHD,快给我钱,给我钱。’ 事情并非如此运作。”

埃莉诺·帕克斯曼(Eleonore Paxman)的三个孩子都在领取残疾福利。Noelle, 31, 患有 1 型糖尿病、视网膜病变和 ADHD;Coco, 18, 患有自闭症和强迫症(OCD);Benjamin, 15, 患有病理性需求回避和 ADHD。

Paxman, 52, 说,这笔钱简直是救星,尤其是她的丈夫失聪并失去了音乐编曲师的工作之后。她放弃工作,在家教育两个最小的孩子,因为这对夫妇觉得在他们所在的伦敦郊区,本杰明刚上学时状态就急剧恶化,因此家庭教育是必要的。

“如果没有这些帮助,我们会陷入巨大的麻烦,”她说。

最近,普莱斯(Price)在经历成长于寄养家庭期间遭受的虐待后,被诊断为患有创伤后应激障碍。她现在每月额外获得 £300 的 PIP 支付金,用于支付与她的病情相关的费用。

虽然该体系确实帮助了有需要的人,但它也容易被滥用。申请不需要医生的支持;而是基于一个人是否能执行一系列日常活动。

“你遭遇挫折,然后唯一能维持生计的方式就是申请福利,”她说。

一个由慈善机构和咨询公司组成的配套产业应运而生,旨在帮助申请人应对福利申请系统,该系统既繁琐,且批评者认为可以被钻空子。根据政府数据,平均每天有近 1,000 人被纳入 PIP 领取范围。

---

“遭遇挫折”

英国政府面临的问题是,可能申请 PIP 的人群基数巨大。2024 年发布的一项政府调查发现,四分之一的英国适龄劳动人口在技术上可被归类为残疾人。

申请的经济激励非常显著。例如,一名居住在伦敦以外的年轻人每月可以申请约 £900 的失业。

---

一个入口

在距离沃尔顿(Walton)不远的汽车经销店里,员工罗伊·皮尔曼(Roy Pearman)正从个人独立支付(PIP)计划中获益。

负责利物浦慈善机构圣安德鲁社区网络(St Andrew's Community Network)的托尼·谢泼德(Tony Shepherd)表示,政府建立了一套将人们纳入福利体系的“传送带”,但几乎没有提供帮助他们脱离福利的手段。他指出,像政府资助的心理健康支持这类能帮助人们重返工作的服务,目前存在很长的等待名单。此外,就业机会也匮乏。

领取 PIP 且被归类为行动不便的客户可以无需预付现金地租赁汽车——他们只需放弃每月约 £320 的“增强型行动”津贴。由政府支付的租赁费用中包含了所有道路税、保险和汽车保养。车辆每三年可以更换一次新车。

但并非所有人的情况都如此顺利。前往坎昆度假的维兰德(Wieland)在今年早些时候承认欺诈罪,并且必须偿还部分 2.3 万英镑。她的律师告诉法庭,维兰德没有意识到领取这些款项意味着她实际上是不被允许出门的。

提供车辆的 Motability 公司现已成为该国最大的汽车租赁公司。去年,全国有 860,000 人拥有 Motability 汽车。Motability Operations 首席执行官安德鲁·米勒(Andrew Miller)表示:“该计划之所以存在,是因为我们解决了一个真实存在的市场失灵问题。”

在经销店里,售出的福特(Ford)和高端比亚迪(BYD)电动汽车中,约 60% 是通过 Motability 租赁的。皮尔曼说:“世界上其他任何地方都没有这样的制度。”

PIP 尤其具有价值,因为它是通往其他丧能支付金的入口,并且可以取消一个家庭可申请的失业或住房补贴总额的上限。

他用英语中对创可贴(Band-Aid)的称呼将其形容为“一块贴布(sticking plaster)”。

使英国的财政状况更加稳固,但将进一步抑制经济增长。

OMINIC WHISSON 为华尔街日报报道

英格兰银行前首席经济学家、前伯纳姆(Burnham)顾问安迪·哈尔丹(Andy Haldane)表示,如果政府想要赢得投资者信任并降低借贷成本,就需要证明其能够对福利等领域进行政治上痛苦的支出削减。“市场现在怀疑这是一个传统的‘税收与支出’社会主义政府,只是拥有更好的 TikTok 宣传手段。”如果他们被归类为病重无法工作且领取 PIP,那么免税金额将增加到约 2,000 英镑。如果你在英国从事一份每周工作 40 小时的最低工资工作,税后每月到手金额为 1,880 英镑。

在沃尔顿,大量居民依赖福利生活。

在沃尔顿主街一家炸鸡店附近,22 岁的摩根·普莱斯(Morgan Price)是百万名既不上学、没有工作也未接受职业培训的英国青年之一。普莱斯和她的男友勉强维持

个人日志

© 2026 道琼斯公司。保留所有权利。

华尔街日报

如何识别早期疏离的信号

研究表明,与父母关系的疏远通常是逐渐开始的。治疗师表示,识别这些阶段有助于达成和解。

罗格斯大学教授克里斯蒂娜·沙普(Kristina Scharp)研究关系疏离问题。

伊丽莎白·伯恩斯坦(ELIZABETH BERNSTEIN)

2026年10月13日,星期二

当我采访那些与成年子女关系疏离的父母时,许多人说:“我的孩子突然就和我断绝了联系。我完全没有预料到。”

然而,那些选择与父母“断联”的人经常告诉我,这个决定是他们的最后手段——而且是酝酿了很久的结果。

为什么会出现这种脱节?

罗格斯大学研究该问题的传播学教授克里斯蒂娜·沙普表示,疏离通常发生在一个连续谱上——而父母并不总是能识别出这些迹象。可以将其想象成一个从1到10的量表,其中10代表父母与子女完全接触,而1代表完全没有接触。在这两者之间,存在着缓慢的退缩:电话和拜访减少,被允许接触的机会降低。

“疏离总是非黑即白的说法是一个误区,”沙普说。

沙普确定了疏离的八个特征,即那些正与父母疏远的成年子女在行为或情感上发生变化的领域:

沟通数量:他们减少接触量。在程度较轻的疏离中,他们可能偶尔会打电话。在更严重的情况下,则完全没有接触。

沟通质量:他们停止分享有意义或私人信息。例如,他们不再谈论工作或伴侣,而是谈论天气。

搬离或远离。有些人可能会保持联系,而另一些人则搬走且不告诉父母居住地。

情感的有无:他们对父母产生的情感量发生了变化。有些人被愤怒或绝望淹没,而另一些人则表示感到麻木。

正向或负向影响:情感的基调发生变化,随着子女变得更加疏离,情感通常变得更加负面。例如,某人可能从觉得母亲难以相处,转变为怨恨甚至憎恨她。

和解意愿:留在家庭中的愿望发生变化。有些人决定切断联系,而另一些人则抱有希望,认为如果父母某些行为改变,关系可以修复。

角色互惠:他们不再认为父母的行为符合母亲和父亲应有的样子。

同时,他们也停止表现出子女对父母应有的行为。例如,他们可能会拒绝在父母生病甚至临终时前往探视。

法律行动:他们正式与父母切断关系,例如更改姓名或更改遗嘱中的受益人。

乔·伯恩斯坦(Joe Bernstein)说,在屏蔽父亲之前,他尝试了不同的沟通方式。

沙普表示,所有这些行为都处于一个光谱之上,并非每一次疏离都会涉及所有方面。人们的状态也可能会波动,在不同时间点与父母的关系时而靠近,时而远离。

如果父母能理解这一点,他们或许能够改善关系。“这个连续谱就是妥协可以存在的地方,”沙普说。

在Reddit上,评论者分享了如何与父母保持距离的策略:每隔一次才回复电话或短信;在知道父母会很忙的时候回电;要求他们停止询问关于自己的情况;以及开始采取“灰色岩石法”(grey rocking),即刻意让你的沟通变得像一块灰色岩石一样枯燥且毫无反应。

人们并不总是会以各种方式告知父母。即使告知了,父母有时也会抵制子女试图建立的界限。与此同时,父母可能会将这种退缩误认为是一个自然的成长阶段,直到事后才意识到其严重程度。

然而,那些选择远离的人并不总是——

“最终的切断是无法否认的既定事实,”家庭关系专家詹妮弗·赫肖恩(Jennifer Hershon)说。

萨克拉门托的一位疏离关系教练表示:“但在模式根深蒂固之前,仍有修复的空间。”

51岁的乔·伯恩斯坦(Joe Bernstein)在经历了自述为不利的童年之后,花了数十年时间试图与父亲建立界限。起初,他尝试减少与父亲的交流。随后,在他结婚并育有孩子后,他停止分享家庭消息,并拒绝举行聚会。他还尝试在心理上主动将父亲排除在脑海之外。

但伯恩斯坦说,这些都没有让他感觉好转。他仍然会对童年的某些事件产生闪回,感到被愤怒吞噬。他说,他越是疏远,他的父亲就越是反弹。

三年前,伯恩斯坦开始接受心理治疗,这帮助他处理了自己的情绪。当他的父亲随后对此提出批评时,伯恩斯坦说,他的回应是拉黑了父亲。

“这给了我足够的慰藉,让我能够退后一步,更平静地面对这种情况,”这位在芝加哥担任高等教育管理人员的伯恩斯坦说道,“而且这甚至让我对他产生了一种同情心,因为他也经历过艰辛的童年。”

至于潜在的和解,伯恩斯坦表示,如果他的父亲能够以尊重和文明的方式对待他,他将对此表示欢迎。“那将是更好的结果,”他说,“因为在阴暗中结束关系对任何人都没有好处。”

那些关系疏离的父母和子女可以做些什么来弥合分歧?

并非所有疏远或断绝关系的子女都希望重新建立联系。例如,如果他们曾遭受虐待,保持距离可能会更安全。

然而,许多疏离是由沟通或界限问题引起的。在这种情况下,治疗师建议希望修复关系的父母和子女在餐厅等中立场所见面交谈。成年子女应当承认自己正在疏远——并且在解释问题所在时,应专注于行为模式而非单一事件。

亚特兰大专门研究父母与成年子女关系的心理治疗师凯瑟琳·希克姆(Catherine Hickem)建议,父母应该随身携带一个笔记本。她建议父母告诉孩子:“我意识到我犯了一些错误,伤害了你,我想听听所有这些事情。”

希克姆表示,父母重要的是不要采取防御姿态,不要试图解释或为自己的行为辩护。他们应该倾听,告诉孩子他们很感激孩子说出真相所需要的勇气,并承诺努力改变自己的行为。

随后,父母应该花几天时间反思所听到的内容,再次给孩子打电话,让对话继续下去。

“修复并不是一个完全宣泄而快感的瞬间,”内华达州里诺的一位持有执照的婚姻与家庭治疗师瑞秋·哈克(Rachel Haack)说道,她的工作对象是处理疏离关系的家庭,“而是在距离之中保持联系。”

联合航空利用“等级匹配”针对竞争对手

作者:DAWN GILBERTSON

以下内容首次出现在每周的《旅行》时事通讯中。

在达美航空(Delta)放弃 Starlink 服务而选择亚马逊之后,你可能已经听说了它与埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)之间的那场风波。联合航空(United)趁机通过针对达美(以及美国航空)的常旅客开展活动,来宣传其 Starlink 服务。它采取的一种手段被称为“等级匹配”(status match)。

不熟悉这个概念?其运作方式如下:如果你在一家航空公司拥有会员等级,你可以申请在竞争对手航空公司立即获得相同等级,至少在短期内如此。航空公司经常运行等级匹配促销活动,以吸引常旅客转投阵营,或者至少尝试竞争对手的服务。

有时,他们会匹配你的等级并在此基础上提升一级。美国航空(American Airlines)在 8 月通过我们的企业差旅部门提供了这样一项促销。我在西南航空(Southwest Airlines)拥有 A List 等级,因此提供了证明并提交申请。不久之后,我获得了美国航空直到 12 月 16 日的白金等级(Platinum status)。(黄金等级 Gold 是美国航空的基础等级。)该等级已经为我提供了免费的额外腿部空间座位、托运行李、优先登机和奖励里程。目前还没有升级舱位。

但这里有个陷阱:你必须在截止日期前累积一定数量的忠诚度积分才能维持该等级。你可以通过飞行、在航空公司的合作伙伴处消费或使用其信用卡来赚取这些积分。(为了达成目标并获取欢迎奖金,我办理了一张美国航空的低年费信用卡。)

为了在 2028 年 3 月之前维持白金等级,我需要从挑战开始起累积 25,000 个忠诚度积分。到目前为止,我已经赚了 11,255 个。

即使接下来有两次美国航空的飞行(包括一次飞往欧洲的经济舱航班),这个目标可能仍难以触及。但我已经达到了黄金等级的门槛(10,000 个忠诚度积分),所以这是一个小小的胜利。这次促销确实让我更多地使用美国航空,这对航空公司来说是一次胜利。

你不需要拥有企业代理机构才有资格申请等级匹配。联合航空最新的活动针对的是达美和美国航空的乘客,但全年一直有类似的促销在运行。因此,如果你在某家航空公司拥有等级并想尝试其他选择,可以联系该航空公司的常旅客计划。

达美和美国航空的乘客在 10 月 15 日之前可以参与联合航空的 Starlink 促销匹配。一旦获得批准,你必须在 90 天内消费 1,500 美元至 7,000 美元并进行飞行,才能维持该等级。

联合航空等航空公司通过临时等级促销来吸引旅客。

路途笔记

▶ 对于纽瓦克(Newark)的乘客来说是个好消息:美国运通(American Express)现在计划在 A 航站楼建立一个 30,000 平方英尺的休息室,这将是其最大的休息室。原计划是 18,000 平方英尺。(原计划还要求今年开业;而更大的休息室将在 2027 年亮相。)美国运通忍不住讽刺那些在休息室竞争中紧追其后的其他信用卡公司:它将成为唯一一家在纽约三大机场均设有网点的运营商。美国运通还宣布将在伦敦希思罗机场增加第二个休息室。

▶ 美国航空承诺对其北卡罗来纳州夏洛特(Charlotte, N.C.)枢纽的休息室进行升级,计划建立一个新的 40,000 平方英尺的 Admirals Club。该休息室预计将于 2028 年开业。

另外,美国航空计划在其所有 1,000 架干线客机上安装 Starlink Wi-Fi 服务,高于今年早些时候宣布的 500 架。

---

一个实用小贴士

讨厌在飞行前像打兼职一样盯着航空公司的座位图寻找更好的位置?现在,只要你在预订机票后,在美国航空(American Airlines)的应用程序中选择加入一项新功能,并且在起飞前至少 24 小时完成操作,该公司将自动为你搜索同一舱位中的可用座位。这项功能被称为“自动换座”。你可以选择走道、中间或靠窗座位,以及是否仅希望移至更靠前的座位。不喜欢隔板座?那就不要勾选那个选项。紧急出口排座位不在此列。该航空公司表示,乘客的安置将基于其常旅客等级以及申请换座选项的时间。联合航空(United Airlines)在今年早些时候也推出了类似功能。

---

旅行算术:5亿美元

这是自 2025 年 8 月首演以来,拉斯维加斯 Sphere 球形场馆《绿野仙踪》的门票销售额。不过,一些分析师担心,尽管增加了 4D 效果等新功能,但需求正在冷却。

赞与弹

赞赏西南航空(Southwest Airlines)的一项对我来说很新颖的功能。在其应用程序的帮助中心“需要更多帮助?”选项下,有一个“我们将致电您”的功能。你只需输入姓名和电话号码,就会收到回电。(这与拨打公司电话并在长时间等待期间被提供回电选项不同。)一名西南航空的代表几乎立即给我回了电话,并迅速解决了座位分配问题。

强烈谴责那些前台职员迎接你时不是用温暖的问候,而是机械地要求“请出示身份证件和信用卡”的酒店。这与那些在你刚走到柜台前就要求出示身份证件和保险卡的医生诊所没有区别。根据我的经验,无论酒店的日房价如何,这种情况发生得过于频繁,且为整个入住体验营造了糟糕的氛围。

如需订阅本时事通讯,请访问 wsj.com / newsletters。

气候专家为自己的家打造“防灾堡垒”

纽约大学研究员表示,每位房主都应考虑应对极端天气的准备工作

作者:AMY MYERS JAFFE

在对待自己的家时,我对气候风险近乎痴迷。这种谨慎是天生的。

一方面,这是我的职业要求。作为纽约大学的一名能源与可持续发展专家,我曾在美国国家航空航天局(NASA)的资助下研究美国的气候韧性。

此外,在居住于气候压力较大的地区期间,我也不得不应对许多极端天气事件。事实上,在9月底,一场强烈的东北风暴(nor'easter)将我房产内的一棵大树吹倒,幸好没有砸中我的房子。与此同时,就在几周前,在暴雨倾盆之时,我地下室的潜水泵一直在超负荷运转。

这是我经历的一系列长期极端天气事件中的最新一次。有一次在休斯顿,一场飓风突然转向城市,导致我们无法及时安全撤离。在等待飓风登陆时,我们睡在楼上,身边放着救生筏、斧头和应急天气广播,以防必须通过屋顶逃生。幸运的是,积水从未超过我们的前院,但我们断电了五周多。

在加利福尼亚州的戴维斯,我所在街区的变压器在热浪期间反复爆炸,让我们在酷暑中煎熬,有时长达数日。更糟糕的是,由于吸入附近山火产生的烟雾,我们一直处于患病状态。火势从未蔓延到戴维斯市本身,但有时在我于奥克兰的办公室工作时,山火会阻碍我通勤回家。

在著名的“雪魔劫”(Snowmageddon)期间,我也在康涅狄格州的纽黑文。那次事件在单个冬季给波士顿带来了108.6英寸的降雪。它还带来了极地涡旋的寒冷——而我租的房子窗玻璃薄得离谱,且隔热效果极差

至少应该对气候问题有所思考,尤其是随着地球变暖,极端天气事件变得更加频繁,且潜在强度更高。

无论你住在哪里,考虑进行气候准备很可能是值得的。我曾参与的一个研究团队表明,美国许多地区的极端高温和降雨已经加剧,而未来一些最严重的极端天气事件将发生在迄今为止尚未发生过此类事件的地方。

基于我的亲身经历,以下是我为目前的家所选择的方案:

---

洪水与火灾风险

在气候挑战日益严峻的环境中,如果可能的话,靠近最近的食品店、药店或急诊室是有益的。因此,我选择了一处在危机时刻不会让我陷入孤立的房产。我们居住的山丘步行即可到达镇中心,这意味着无论积雪多深,我无需使用汽车就能到达杂货店和通勤铁路。

住在山丘上同样大有不同。根据广泛使用的 2050 年洪水地图,我的街道没有易涝倾向,且海平面上升随着时间的推移也不会影响我的房产价值或保险费率。我的车道还内置了排水管。这不仅在面对连续暴雨时很重要,在面对积雪融化时同样关键。

此外,我排除了任何野火风险较高的地方,以及任何与林地接壤的房产。我热爱在自然保护区徒步,但不想让它们成为我的邻居。

然后是一棵雄伟的白橡树,就在几周前,它还是我们房产中一个庄严的地标。它看起来很神奇——就像迪士尼电影中会对小孩说话的那种树——我真的很喜欢它。但作为我灾难规划的一部分,我采取了一些在当时看来令人难过、但或许救了我的房子的措施。

起初,我咨询了一位树艺师。我们修剪了树冠(这需要定期进行),使其不易受风影响,并砍掉了在风暴期间最有可能掉落在房子上的树枝。

在树艺师的建议下,我们用工业钢丝固定了树的主枝,以防止它们剧烈摇摆。这一策略在之前的无数次风暴中都奏效了,但这次最新的风暴除外。但谁知道如果没这么做,现在倒下的树枝会造成什么样的破坏。

保持电力供应

按照气候发展的趋势,备用发电机或电池是值得拥有的。我的房子在交付时就配备了一套全规模的家用发电机。几年前,一场持续两分钟的气旋龙卷风在长岛海湾登陆并击中了一条主要输电线,让我深刻体会到了这类设备的重要性。朋友和邻居们在数周的时间里处于黑暗之中,没有冷藏设备,也没有现代生活便利。我不想吹嘘,但除了在夜晚能看到东西,我们还能洗热水澡并准备家常餐点。

家用发电机备用系统最可靠的燃料取决于居住地。我的通用专家意见是屋顶太阳能加电池。但对于现有房屋来说,安装屋顶太阳能可能很昂贵,而且并非每个屋顶都适用。我的房子有山墙和天窗,因此太阳能的表面积有限。

我们目前在发电机中使用丙烷,到目前为止,无论天气如何,供应都没有问题。

艾米·迈尔斯·贾费站在她被连根拔起的树旁。

许多休斯顿人拥有家用柴油发电机,但我并不推荐。柴油供应链在极端天气下经常中断,而且柴油发电机如果长期闲置可能会出现故障。

我们还有一种在紧急情况下保持移动的方式:我们的电动汽车。我知道这听起来违背直觉,但根据我的经验,配备家用充电桩和备用发电机的电动汽车在抗风暴能力上优于汽油车。请记住,没有电就无法抽油。在停电期间,电动汽车车主在本地驾驶方面通常比那些开普通车的亲友邻居表现更好。

采取防御措施 在如今的暴雨面前,地下室必须安装自动潜水泵。最初,我们将泵连接到电池系统——结果在一次严重风暴中电池失效了。现在我们将泵连接到家庭电力网络,鉴于我们有发电机,这已被证明是可靠的。本月早些时候,该泵成功抵御了一场在短短几个小时内降雨量约 7 英寸的暴雨。

这也是一个提醒:在如今不断变化的气候环境下,对于放在地下室的东西,你永远不能过于大意。无论是什么,都需要储存在离地较高的架子上。此外,我们的整个地下室和爬行空间都覆盖了防霉墙面材料。为了应对万一发生的最坏情况,这是洪水后清理工作的必须之举。

为了确保电子设备的安全,我们安装了全屋电涌保护器,它可以过滤掉电网中可能损坏电器的突然电压峰值。我在加利福尼亚州戴维斯的一次热浪之后吸取了教训:一次变压器爆炸引起的电涌烧毁了我冰箱的电路板。

窗玻璃和糟糕的绝缘。

所以,在我丈夫和我买下我位于康涅狄格州南部的梦想之屋之前,我确保我的住所尽可能具备气候防御能力,这也许并不令人惊讶。

大多数人会觉得我采取的一些措施过于激进(我的家人有时也是这么想的)。但我认为每个购房者都应该考虑

一支伐木队正在清理被吹倒的橡树。最右侧是雅菲家中众多空气过滤装置之一。

尽管壁炉很有魅力,但我们并不经常使用。(出于气象防御目的,我们封堵了另外三个壁炉。)离开加州后,我对室内空气洁净度产生了一种执念,这排除了在屋内燃烧木材的可能性。

我目前的家中还配备了多级 HEPA 过滤空气净化器,结合了碳吸收和离子技术,这在新冠疫情期间派上了用场。我们可以隔离感染者,并确保其他人不被感染。在新英格兰地区,这些设备在对抗加拿大山火烟雾方面也证明了其有效性。

无论你对全球气候趋势或所在地区气候风险持何种看法,气候技术都能发挥作用。你的家人可能会抱怨所有这些预防措施,但最终,他们会为结果感到庆幸。

圣杯级收藏品:航空公司洗漱包

(接第一页)

航空公司纪念品。他们将这些包收在储藏室里,等待下一次飞行或搬进更大的公寓。有些人细心地用完里面的所有物品,而另一些人则将其清空——因为担心如果一支乳液在包里放上几十年,从化学角度来看会发生什么。

在转售市场上,备受追捧的洗漱包价格可超过 $100。但许多收藏家表示,在网上购买无异于作弊。

来自德国的航空公司博主克里斯·米德尔(Chris Miedl)估计,他在旅途中至少收集了 70 个。其中有一个中华航空与 The North Face 合作的霓虹黄色款,还有一个新加坡航空的方形黑色小包,里面配有一支 Lalique 蜡烛和一条警告:禁止在飞机上使用。

“我爱每一个,”米德尔说。他将这些包储存在一个在拍卖会上花几百欧元买来的银色航空公司服务推车里。此后,他又订购了两辆推车,一辆用来放睡衣,另一辆用来放更多的洗漱包。

对于 51 岁的米德尔来说,这些洗漱包是航空公司将高消费乘客视为贵宾的一种方式。航空公司也试图在竞争中胜出,与高端零售商签署协议:土耳其航空与 Lanvin,达美航空与 Missoni,沙特阿拉伯航空与 Elie Saab。

乘坐阿联酋航空头等舱的女性乘客可以获得价值超过 $100 的宝格丽(Bulgari)Le Gemme Sahare 香水。此外还有一面金色口袋镜。男性乘客则获得宝格丽香水,这是一种“灵感来自血红碧玉宝石的活力能量”的木质香调。

罗恩达·克劳福德(Rhonda Crawford)表示,情况并非一直如此。

克里斯·米德尔将他的洗漱包储存在一个银色航空公司服务推车里。

克劳福德是美国航空客户体验设计与战略高级副总裁。

她表示,在疫情期间削减开支后,一些航空公司在考虑是否应该继续提供洗漱包。(美国航空表示从未考虑过这一点。)但疫情后的繁荣——以及一群痴迷旅行的年轻飞行者——重新激发了对高端产品的需求。

“人们对体验的需求在增长——坦白说,是对高端体验的需求,”克劳福德说。她认为这些洗漱包是“核心服务之上的点睛之笔”。

美国航空尝试过推出特色洗漱包,包括与

安德鲁·林(Andrew Lim)在旅途中收集了大约 200 个洗漱包。

美国足球协会合作,针对今年夏天的世界杯推出的一款产品,将冷却凝胶放入一个透明的、符合体育场要求的袋子中。其标准配置(在超级经济舱中也提供)包括来自名媛美容师乔安娜·瓦加斯(Joanna Vargas)的产品。

本·尼克尔-德安德烈亚(Ben Nickel-D'Andrea)在日常护肤中大量依赖这些旅行装瓶装产品。

这位常驻西雅图的自由旅行记者对他大约 150 个洗漱包的收藏采取了更实用的方式。迷你牙刷和袜子被捐给慈善机构。美容产品则保留到他或他的丈夫(同样是一名旅行记者)再次需要时。有些包——比如他用来装药品的美联航硬壳盒——被频繁使用。

大约 15 个洗漱包陈列在他的家庭办公室里,旁边摆放着模型飞机和其他旅行配件。这位 41 岁的记者说:“这不是故意的,只是我们的储物箱没空间了。”

帕斯·科查尔(Parth Kochhar)在预订航班前会检查有哪些洗漱包可用——尽管这尚未影响他的最终购买决定。“我并没有在这种选择面前被宠坏,”他开玩笑说。

他收集了大约 30 个。这位 34 岁的男子一旦拿到洗漱包,就绝不会想到使用里面的高端美容产品——即使在飞行中也不行。因为那样可能会破坏包裹在某些洗漱包上的薄纸片。

“我就是不想打开它,”来自印度古鲁格拉姆的顾问科查尔说,“我可以把它滑开看看,但我觉得如果它不能恢复原状或放回原位,感觉就不对了。”

他目前渴望的是卡塔尔航空与 Diptyque 合作的套装,里面装满了这家法国香氛品牌的美容产品。如果他实在忍不住想试用,他会向乘务员索要第二套。

对于电子商务专家林(Lim)来说,他的“圣杯”是更为罕见的东西:高丽航空(Air Koryo)这家朝鲜航空公司的套装。

“我不知道他们是否提供洗漱用品,”他说,“但如果能拥有一个,那将是非常棒的。”

艺术评论

电影评论 / 凯尔·史密斯 (KYLE SMITH)

斯坦利·库布里克的遗产

在约翰·福特最伟大的杰作——改编自约翰·斯坦贝克小说《愤怒的葡萄》(1940)中,一个在20世纪30年代尘暴灾难中破产的俄克拉荷马州家庭,其情节围绕着阻止一名推土机司机拆除他们已不再拥有的家而展开。但为什么要责怪这个同样陷入困境的小伙子?他这么做是因为他需要一份工作。

标准收藏公司集结这位大师导演的全部电影

他的命令来自肖尼土地与牲畜公司(Shawnee Land and Cattle Co.)。那么,用散弹枪瞄准其总裁,或许可行?不,我们被告知,那位高管只是在试图满足银行的要求。也许去图尔萨枪杀一名银行家?我们得知,“他不过是个经理”,又一个为了维持底线而焦虑的普通人。

“那么我们该枪杀谁?”一名困惑的农民问道。

这就是现代人的困境:你无法与敌人战斗,因为你看不见你的敌人。反派无处不在,却又无迹可寻。他没有面孔,没有家庭住址。

作为福特在美影坛影像与构图领域最伟大大师的继任者,斯坦利·库布里克(Stanley Kubrick,1928-1999)正是基于这一洞察建立起他的职业生涯。在库布里克的电影中,人们被卷入一个无形、抽象且全能的系统,倾尽所有与之抗争,最终被碾成齑粉——只有一个显著的例外。当最后一帧画面滚动时,几乎能听到电影制作者,或者说上帝,在幕后发出轻笑。

被克里斯托弗·诺兰称为有史以来最伟大电影制作者的人现在拥有了他的纪念碑:“库布里克全集”(The Complete Kubrick),这是一个包含30张光盘、售价$600的套装,收录了全部13部长片的高清4K蓝光版。标准收藏公司(The Criterion Collection)的这个礼包还包括库布里克的三部短片、档案访谈以及几部关于这位导演的纪录片——其中包括由薇薇安·库布里克拍摄的一部极具启发性的作品,她在父亲拍摄《闪灵》期间一直随行。正如一位强迫症导演所应有的风格,这是一份送给强迫症者的礼物。(发行日期为10月20日。)

库布里克称他的第一部实验电影(1952年的《恐惧与欲望》)为失败之作,而第二部《杀手的吻》(1955年)也并不太出色。至于其他11部?几乎全部是里程碑之作,即便包括那部让库布里克抱怨自己被降格为“雇佣工”的作品——1960年的《斯巴达克斯》,这是一部精彩的世纪中叶史诗,但并不真正具有库布里克风格。制片人兼主演柯克·道格拉斯掌握着主导权。

这位电影制作者讲述了一个跨越数十年的故事,关于被战争(1957年的《光荣之路》,1987年的《全金属外壳》)、军工复合体(1964年的《奇爱》)、欲望(1962年的《洛丽塔》)、超自然现象(1980年的《闪灵》)、梦境(1999年的《Eyes Wide Shut》)以及命运(1956年的《杀手》,1975年的《巴里·林登》)所摧毁的人们。在大多数情况下,不可撼动的系统利用了角色严重的缺陷:在《闪灵》中,幽灵并没有对杰克·托伦斯做太多事情,除了帮他打开一个柜子。真正摧毁他的是他那充满愤怒的酗酒倾向,或者说是由酒精驱动的愤怒。

这些电影冰冷且令人敬畏的庄严感诱使人们一次又一次地重温;四十年来,我每隔几年就会播放一次《巴里·林登》,而每次的感受都截然不同。库布里克没有教训我们,也不寻求安慰或改善我们。《失效》(1964年)讲述的故事与同年上映的《奇爱》相同,但它已从文化记忆中淡出,因为其严肃的传道方式不像库布里克的邪恶讽刺那样经久不衰。

尽管这位出生于纽约的电影制作者会对当今碎片化的注意力感到厌恶,但他的作品已经适应了2020年代。那些晦涩和迂回的方面被聊天群拆解分析;具有模因潜力的图像被无休止地循环利用。托尼·库蒂斯大喊“我是斯巴达克斯!”是不可磨灭的电影历史,就像斯利姆·皮肯斯在《奇爱》中在世界末日般的牛仔竞技中欢呼,1971年《发条橙》中撑开眼睛的洗脑场景,《闪灵》结尾被冻僵的杰克,以及苏·莱昂在《洛丽塔》中穿着比基尼晒太阳时眼神中那抹“我敢让你试试”的挑衅。

在某种程度上,最不具“库布里克风格”的故事是《2001:太空漫游》(1968),因为这是唯一一部英雄获得胜利的作品,且其规模令人惊叹。宇航员戴夫·鲍曼重生为一个神一般的角色(在库布里克的联合编剧亚瑟·C·克拉克所著的配套小说中被称为“星孩”),他实际上就是弗里德里希·尼采笔下的“超人”——终极生命形式。库布里克刻意将这一出场画面与理查德·施特劳斯向尼采致敬的作品《查拉图斯特拉如是说》中的《日出》乐章相结合。或许库布里克觉得,在这里展现的乐观主义足以抵消他一生中所有阴郁的结局;《发条橙》虽然

斯特林·海登(打手势)及其同伴在库布里克1956年的拼图式黑色电影《谋杀》中。

以主角的一种胜利告终,但这是一种讽刺的胜利,因为一个精神病杀人犯抹杀了所有改造努力,并回归到了他可怕的真实自我。

《谋杀》曾给昆汀·塔伦蒂诺的《水库狗》带来灵感,它是如何拍摄一个信任观众自行拼凑的“拼图式”故事的奠基之作——这种手法在当时很罕见,而现在几乎无处不在,尤其是在精品电视剧中。这是一个关于抢劫赛马场之严密、分步计划的故事,以及这个计划如何被更加细致且无情的命运机智地瓦解。库布里克用他标志性的黑色幽默风范为影片收尾。斯特林·海登饰演的强尼·克莱在经历了各种波折后,只能无助地看着装满赃款的手提箱从行李车上翻倒。现金被风吹散。“你得快跑!”有人告诉他。“有什么区别,”他回答道,带着无可挑剔的黑色电影反英雄式的无奈。

强尼无法逃脱命运,正如巴里·林登一样。巴里是一个身无分文的爱尔兰流氓,他在18世纪的欧洲用谎言铺就道路,攀升到了令人惊讶的高位,但最终遭受了必然的报应,甚至更多。《哈佛灯笼》杂志曾宣布《巴里·林登》“沉闷”且是“1975年最烂的电影”。而如今,在《视与听》2022年的导演投票中,它位列史上最佳电影第12名,在评论家投票中位列第45名。同样,古怪且节奏缓慢的《大开眼戒》——可以称之为《1999:性漫游》——并不轻易透露其秘密。然而,它一直在赢得新的、痴迷的崇拜者。

电影界在斯坦利·库布里克在世时就将其视为天才,但如果说有什么变化的话,那就是在他去世四分之一个世纪后的今天,他的名声反而更高了。在他去世时,史蒂文·斯皮尔伯格指出:“他创造的不止是电影。他给了我们完整的环境体验,当你观看他的电影越多,这种体验就越强烈,而非减弱。在我们所有人都争先恐后地模仿他时,他没有模仿任何人。”库布里克的电影或许将永恒……永恒……永恒。

艺术日历

10月13日当周活动指南

由《华尔街日报》艺术评论编辑部提供

电影

《你能看到一切》(You Can See Everything)(10月16日)

Theranos创始人伊丽莎白·霍姆斯(Elizabeth Holmes)及其伴侣比利·埃文斯(Billy Evans)接待了由兰斯·奥本海姆(Lance Oppenheim)和内森·菲尔德(Nathan Fielder)率领的纪录片摄制组,记录了霍姆斯在进入联邦监狱服刑(因欺诈投资者)之前的生活。随后,奥本海姆先生和菲尔德先生(后者为其长片导演处女作)对这对伴侣进行了为期三年的跟踪拍摄。

《牺牲》(Sacrifice)(Netflix,10月16日)

《街头霸王》(Street Fighter)(10月16日)

伊丽莎白·霍姆斯在《你能看到一切》中。

Capcom的这款电子游戏系列被搬上了大银幕,讲述了疏远的格斗家们为了参加一场重大赛事而重新集结的故事。在众多演员组成的阵容中,参与格斗的包括诺亚·森蒂尼奥(Noah Centineo)、安德鲁·科基(Andrew Koji)、卡莉娜·梁(Callina Liang)、乔·“罗马帝国”·阿诺艾(Joe "Roman Reigns" Anoa'i)、科迪·罗兹(Cody Rhodes)、埃里克·安德烈(Eric André)、安德鲁·舒尔茨(Andrew Schulz)、柯蒂斯·“50 Cent”·杰克逊(Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson)、杰森·莫玛(Jason Momoa)和奥维尔·佩克(Orville Peck)。

电视

《大师计划》(Masterplan)

(Prime Video,10月16日)

(Prime Video,10月16日)

斯坦利·图奇(Stanley Tucci)饰演一名技艺精湛的小偷,他与由西蒙娜·塔巴斯科(Simona Tabasco)和维克多·贝尔蒙多(Victor Belmondo)饰演的陌生人合作盗取《蒙娜丽莎》。在行动过程中,三人之间一段令人惊讶的家族关系浮出水面。

一名过气的名人(克里斯·埃文斯 饰)试图在一次奢华的慈善晚宴上策划职业生涯的回归,结果却被生态恐怖分子(安雅·泰勒-乔伊和Yung Lean 饰)打断。

戏剧

《其他沙漠城市》(Other Desert Cities)

(纽约哈德逊剧院,10月18日-2027年1月17日)

朱莉娅·路易斯-德雷弗斯(Julia Louis-Dreyfus)、艾德·哈里斯(Ed Harris)和艾莉森·珍妮(Allison Janney)主演这部由乔恩·罗宾·拜茨(Jon Robin Baitz)创作的2012年普利策奖入围作品的百老汇复排剧。由约翰·本杰明·希基(John Benjamin Hickey)执导,讲述了一个关系网广泛的家庭,在女儿写了一本揭秘回忆录回家后,其地位陷入危机的故事。

音乐

Fontaines D.C.,《多巴胺室》(Dopamine Chamber)(10月16日)

这支爱尔兰另类摇滚乐队在他们的第五张专辑中采用了更多由合成器驱动的声音,其中还包括西班牙创作歌手罗莎莉亚(Rosalía)的客串。

马克斯·里希特(Max Richter),《当洪水肆虐》(While the Flood Rages)(10月16日)

这位出生于德国的作曲家的新作改编自他为韦恩·麦格雷戈(Wayne McGregor)的芭蕾舞剧《MaddAddam》创作的配乐,该剧灵感源自玛格丽特·阿特伍德(Margaret Atwood)的后末日故事。

歌剧

《卡门》(洛杉矶歌剧院,10月17日-11月7日)

比才的杰作迎来了一次全新的舞台呈现,在由萨德斯·斯特拉斯伯格(Thaddeus Strassberger)执导、多明戈·欣多扬(Domingo Hindoyan)指挥的这次制作中,融入了西班牙哥特风格。

艺术

《锡耶纳:青铜艺术,1450-1500》(纽约弗里克收藏馆,10月15日-2027年1月18日)

这是首个将锡耶纳视为意大利文艺复兴时期青铜实验与创新中心的展览。约40件作品——包括雕像、浮雕、奖章等,其中许多从未在托斯卡纳以外地区展出——揭示了多纳泰罗(Donatello)、韦基耶塔(Vecchietta)、弗朗切斯科·迪·乔治(Francesco di Giorgio)等人的天才之作。

《沃克设计三年展:超越物质主义》(明尼阿波利斯沃克艺术中心,10月17日-2027年2月14日)

该博物馆启动了一场三年展,探讨设计塑造文化的方式,既是对当前理念的回应,也塑造了我们与世界的互动方式。这次首届展览聚焦于当代设计如何从工业关注转向更具精神性的主题。

最后推荐

《神话与想象的生物:欧洲与美洲》(纽约大都会艺术博物馆分馆 The Met Cloisters,展至10月18日)

此次展览揭示了跨大西洋地区对超越物种与现实之生物的持久痴迷。我们的评论员指出:“尽管在字面意义和隐喻意义上都隔着一片大海,但欧洲和美洲拥有共同的想象力,一种解释未知的事物的好奇心,以及将神秘之物美化地呈现的欲望。”

来信请发送至

brian.kelly@wsj.com。

费用覆盖 / 作者:亚伦·乌尔曼(Aaron Ullman)

---

华尔街日报每日纵横字谜 / 编辑:Mike Shenk

横向

1 心跳可能会跳过的东西

6 事实与数据

10 音响工程师面临的问题

14 1929年股市事件

15 惊叹之人的声音

16 泰国的邻国

17 游戏之夜的严格规定

19 创作歌手 Tori

20 复仇者联盟中的神

21 探究性的问题

23 美国有袋类动物

26 1974年流行金曲“____-Ca-Dabra”

27 “Diet Pepsi”歌手 Addison ____

29 攀墙者

30 部分女孩的成年礼

33 喋喋不休

35 在慕尼黑,意为“现代的”

36 酿酒师和面包师的供应品

37 哈根达斯口味

41 其最高点是卡塔丁山

43 方言结尾

44 可能在末尾加上 Q 的首字母缩写词

47 没有影响力范围的理论家?

51 西区洗手间

52 岩石爆破员

53 小型合唱团

54 加入一份浓缩咖啡的滴滤咖啡

56 名流群体

58 法语中的女性朋友

59 空中的烦恼

60 意外成本,如本字谜中四个答案所示

65 马萨诸塞州美式足球队(俗称)

66 在杜兰戈,意为“不同的”

67 例如,德梅因市居民

68 也许在后悔一次锻炼

69 阳光之州棒球队

70 刚刚得知

纵向

1 奥地利人的感叹词

2 兄弟会好友

3 卢瓦尔河的水

4 助手(简称)

▶ 在 WSJ.com / Puzzles 在线解谜并参与讨论。

5 波士顿

昵称

6 持续地

阴郁

7 即时通讯先驱

8 60-70年代

由 Efrem

Zimbalist Jr. 主演的

程序剧

系列

9 强力地

宣布

10 其首次飞行

是从

瑞士

飞往以色列

11 回放

分析师的

关注点

12 兴奋的

欢呼

13 二战秘密

组织

18 欧洲的游牧民族

22 “Straight Outta Compton”说唱歌手

23 樱桃废弃物

24 潜在胚胎

25 “Ariel”诗人

26 咒语绑定者?

28 承包商的数字

31 Aviv

32 Osso buco(烩牛膝)肉类

34 哲学家 Immanuel

38 需要

39 火山喷发物

40 “递些泡沫饮料过来”

41 高级戏剧学位

42 充满事实的书籍

45 “天哪!”

46 青蛙的18个之一

48 做正确书写之事的人

49 “芝麻街”上的双语木偶

50 控制,如支出

55 “莫尔·弗兰德斯”作者

57 微小

58 骚乱

59 学校统计数据

61 像某些幽默和某些天气一样

62 “呸!”

63 大快朵颐

64 冬季产品前缀

上一期字谜答案

NFL球队不断重复犯下的低级错误

费城老鹰队和华盛顿指挥官队在第5周比赛的最后时刻,均因时间管理问题以令人瞠目结之的方式丢掉了胜利。

作者:安德鲁·比顿(ANDREW BEATON)

周日,费城老鹰队一度领先杰克逊维尔美洲豹队1分,在比赛还剩8秒时,他们几乎可以肯定能带着愉快的心情从伦敦飞回故乡。

然而,他们竟然还是输了。原因就出在费城队的场边。

美洲豹队之所以能偷走胜利,是因为老鹰队主教练尼克·西里安尼(Nick Sirianni)没有尽可能多地消耗比赛时间,随后又选择给杰克逊维尔的接球手阿米尔·阿卜杜拉(Ameer Abdullah)一个可以回攻的机会,而不是让球队踢出触球(touchback)。

阿卜杜拉抓住机会回攻了53码。这给卡姆·利特尔(Cam Little)留下了最后一秒的时间,他命中了一个57码的射门,锁定 19-17 的胜利,让老鹰队彻底崩溃。

“我没有做出正确的决定,”西里安尼说,“是我让我们输掉了这场比赛。”

对于西里安尼来说,唯一的安慰可能是,这甚至不是周日下午最令人震惊的结局。几个小时后,华盛顿指挥官队在加时赛的最后一分钟有机会通过射门赢得对阵纽约巨人的比赛,但莫名其妙地消耗了太多时间,导致四分卫杰登·丹尼尔斯(Jayden Daniels)在没有暂停的情况下倒地,比赛时间随之耗尽,结果以 27-27 平局收场。这一举动如此愚蠢,以至于巨人队的球员庆祝得像赢了一样。

这两种情况表明,尽管价值数十亿美元的NFL球队支付给球员、教练和高管巨额薪酬以做出最佳决策,但他们仍然经常在大多数坐在沙发上的球迷都能理解的事情上搞砸:比赛末尾的时间管理。在这两个案例中,老鹰队和指挥官队都犯了战略性错误,并为此付出了代价,没能带着胜利离开赛场。

“今晚以平局收场感觉就像输了一样,”华盛顿队教练丹·奎因(Dan Quinn)说,“我为我们的球队感到心碎。”

老鹰队要输掉周日的比赛,实际上经历了一系列错误。在最后一分钟已经进入射门范围的情况下,他们在第一次和第二次进攻时都选择了传球,导致一次传球未完成和一次接球手跑出界外——每次都为美洲豹队停止了计时。当老鹰队在第三次进攻时选择冲球时,美洲豹队使用了他们最后的暂停,而他们之所以还拥有这个暂停,是因为费城队之前没有迫使他们提前消耗掉。否则,老鹰队的射门尝试本可以成为比赛的最后一球。

相反,老鹰队必须在还剩8秒时进行开球,而他们再次失误。如果老鹰队的踢球手杰克·埃利奥特(Jake Elliott)能踢出一个触球,美洲豹队在没有暂停的情况下几乎没有时间采取任何行动。然而,埃利奥特踢出的球被阿卜杜拉轻松接住,随后阿卜杜拉在射门前及时被拦截。

“太糟糕了,”埃利奥特说,“你远道而来,以为自己掌控了赢得一场重大比赛的主动权,而现在我们感到非常沮丧。”

奇怪的是,一支球队在几周前也面临类似的决定,并且同样计算错误。在这种情况下,达拉斯牛仔队因为做了老鹰队本该做的事而犯错。

在对阵巴尔的摩乌鸦队的比赛中,牛仔队在还剩7秒时将比分扳平,随后他们踢出了触球,将球权交给乌鸦队在35码线处接球。即使是像阿卜杜拉那样长的回攻,也会让时钟归零。而且与杰克逊维尔不同,巴尔的摩还剩一个暂停。这使得四分卫拉马尔·杰克逊(Lamar Jackson)能够完成一次长传并停止计时,从而为绝杀射门创造机会。

这两场结果表明,在 NFL 实施新开球规则三年后,各球队在寻找最佳应对方案的过程中依然在摸索。根据 Stats Perform 自 1970 年起记录的数据,在本赛季开始前,从未出现过两支球队在第四节最后 10 秒内都踢进射门球的情况。但在周日的鹰队对阵美洲豹队的比赛之后,这种情况在过去三周内已经发生了两次。

“你觉得你让所有人失望了,”西里安尼说,“这件事会在我心中留下很深的烙印。”

而在华盛顿的结果则更加令人瞠目结舌。指挥官队在比赛还剩约一分钟时,球权处于射门位置。在一次跑球消耗掉大部分时间后,四分卫杰登·丹尼尔斯在还剩 12 秒时再次接球并被擒杀倒地。然而,华盛顿队已经没有暂停了。结果他们没能踢出射门球,而是在时间耗尽时只能对自己感到懊悔。

当这一系列操作立即遭到球队老板之一的猛烈抨击时,这对奎因的职位稳定性来说并非好兆头。

“我完全不敢相信我的指挥官队在时间管理上如此糟糕,”魔术师约翰逊在 X 上发帖称,“我们只需要踢个射门球就能赢得比赛!”

杰森·盖伊(JASON GAY)

洋基队不再是傲慢的混蛋了。这可能是个问题。

有什么比季后赛中的纽约洋基队更不令人恐惧的吗?

一篮子温暖的小猫?州博览会上一次温柔的干草车之旅?还是躺在吊床里,喝着柠檬水,读着一本《大红狗克利福德》?

素食鲨鱼怎么样?一件舒适的毛衣?或者两篮子温暖的小猫?我之所以这么问,是因为纽约这支历史上最自命不凡、冠军拿到手软的棒球俱乐部陷入了一场危机:再也没有人害怕他们了。

他们凭什么让人害怕?

上周,坦帕湾光芒队闯入那个庞大且凶悍的洋基体育场,气定神闲地将这支被动且毫无还手之力的“条纹衫”球队横扫出季后赛。第三场决赛被一次球迷干扰的判罚打断——那些过度热情的洋基球迷和外野墙之间到底有什么深仇大恨——但结果是不容置疑的。

更强但更穷的球队赢了。

这意味着,洋基队将连续第17个赛季无法赢得世界大赛冠军。虽然这种冠军荒在西雅图、匹兹堡或圣迭戈的球迷看来可能毫无感觉,但对于一支赢过27次冠军、将十月的奖杯视为天赋权利的球队来说,这简直是一场灾难。

这可是洋基队,天呐!这是一支理应在每个春天都承诺要赢得冠军戒指,否则就直接跳进哈德逊河的球队。

然而,体育界最成功的特许经营球队之一,现在却成了别人夺冠路上的一个减速带。在最近的13次季后赛亮相中,洋基队仅一次进入世界大赛。

而且那次他们也输了。

你肯定见过洋基球迷穿着那些自夸的外套四处走动,外套上贴满了所有世界大赛冠军的补丁——不仅有德里克·杰特时代的冠军,还有比尔·迪基时代的冠军,就好像外套的主人在那个时代就活着一样。

现在需要一件新外套了:连续两届分区系列赛亚军。'25-'26。

给我订一件。我会在万圣节穿上它,然后谁也不会被吓到。

光芒队对此没有丝毫畏惧,甚至面对那些入侵他们主场(光芒之顶)的洋基球迷也是如此。

坦帕湾队碾压这支混乱的洋基队,就像在六月份打一场对阵落基队的三场系列赛一样轻松。

赛后,为了开玩笑,光芒队在客队休息室里调大了音量,播放了西纳特拉的《纽约,纽约》——这是洋基队的官方主题曲。

连续第17个赛季,洋基队将无法赢得世界大赛冠军。

这听起来像是一个被吓到胆怯的对手吗?

在很久以前,当乔治·斯坦布雷纳穿着高领毛衣四处走动的时候,情况会截然不同。投降是不可接受的。电话会被砸碎。报纸的末页会流露出厌恶。表现低迷的击球手会被放逐,负责人会被撤职。会有一个大声的承诺说要整顿局面。即便他们最终没能整顿好。

现在的洋基队不再是当年的洋基队了。乔治的儿子哈尔不像他已故的父亲那样脾气火爆。他的球队管理方式是临床式的、分析式的——现代但略显缺乏灵魂。这支21世纪的洋基队奇怪地忠诚。主教练亚伦·布恩在没有冠军的情况下生存了九个赛季,这在乔治时代是一个不可想象的里程碑。布莱恩·卡什曼担任总经理的时间已接近三十年。

这些职位曾经像夏季救生员一样不稳定。而卡什曼现在就像一名最高法院大法官。

大乔治的统治时期往往被误认为是长期的成功——但重要的是要记住,洋基队上一次出现17年冠军空白期是在1979年到1996年,那是斯坦布雷纳专横且亲力亲为的鼎盛时期。

在'77和'78年雷吉时代的冠军之后,这支球队直到“哈芬普夫上将”因禁赛而被边缘化,且耐心的总经理“粘人迈克尔”培养出一套年轻阵容后,才再次赢得世界大赛。

尽管如此,很难说那种锐气已经消失了。

这支由温文尔雅的强力击球手亚伦·贾奇(Aaron Judge)率领的洋基队——他在本次季后赛中受伤——并不令人反感,甚至可以说很讨喜。他们没有散发出定义其他洋基时代的那种紧迫感或傲慢感。

沮丧的洋基球迷们担心球队不再是棒球界花钱最多的球队——道奇队、大都会队和费城人队在2026年的薪资支出都更高。道奇队和费城人队利用这些资金进入了季后赛。而大都会队则利用这些钱在Citi球场堆起了一大堆钞票,然后将其付之一炬。

洋基队曾经不计成本地投入,至于后果则以后再担心。而现在,他们有了财政责任感,但却缺乏像坦帕湾或密尔沃基那样低薪资球队那样巧妙的阵容构建能力。

连续两届冠军道奇队则不惜一切代价(没错,这本身就充满争议)。洛杉矶是每个人都讨厌的巨头,以至于他们的支出和统治力可能会导致长期的停赛和停工。

道奇队并不在乎。他们完全接纳这种“超级反派”的形象。

“我们更聪明,更优秀,也更强韧,”在洛杉矶队晋级另一场国家联盟冠军赛后,道奇队经理戴夫·罗伯茨(Dave Roberts)说道。他这么说时很清楚公众在看到这段话后会感到作呕。

这支洋基队需要多一点那种特质。讨喜固然很好,但它不能赢得冠军戒指。

特朗普的“震慑”战略

全球视角

作者:沃尔特·罗素·米德(Walter Russell Mead)

在白宫度过了近六年时间,并在美国政治中心活跃了十多年之后,唐纳德·特朗普依然能够震惊世界。仅在过去一周内,他就暗示将在期中选举后对伊朗发起新一轮攻击;在美方官员警告欧洲国家武器供应可能中断之际,他表示美国将从俄罗斯购买柴油;他宣布了一项似乎让基辅措手不及的“能源停火”协议;公开思索是否恢复对胡塞武装的敌对行动;并呼吁乌克兰总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基下台。

总统近期爆发的外交活动反映了他对伊朗、俄罗斯、能源重要性以及欧洲不重要性的信念。自20世纪80年代以来,他就将伊朗视为对美国的威胁,并认为伊朗拥有核武器或主导波斯湾能源资源将威胁美国利益。他相信化石燃料仍将是地缘政治和经济权力的关键要素,并希望美国在海湾地区发挥主导作用。

同样,特朗普先生认为,在防止莫斯科成为北京的从属伙伴、对抗逊尼派伊斯兰激进主义以及管理两国作为主要能源生产者的角色方面,美国和俄罗斯拥有重叠的利益。特朗普先生和弗拉基米尔·普京还共同蔑视他们一致认为的——现代欧洲自由主义者所拥抱的“文明自杀”。在这种观点看来,华盛顿和莫斯科不应被像乌克兰的民族主义野心或其在欧洲的自由派支持者的哀鸣这样琐碎的事情所分化。

与此同时,特朗普先生知道他的政治联盟分为“克制派”和“鹰派”两个阵营。鹰派希望对俄罗斯和伊朗都采取强硬政策。克制派则希望美国与莫斯科和解,并远离中东。

特朗普先生试图通过采取一种分化的政策,将自己的直觉与支持者的意愿调和。虽然从未给任何人全部想要的,但总的来说,他在伊朗政策上给了鹰派更多影响力,而在俄罗斯问题上则迎合克制派的感触。随着他面对中东地区一场更持久且更混乱的战争,特朗普先生希望通过更积极地尝试建立与莫斯科的联系,来满足他的克制派盟友。随着期中选举临近,他能将自己的俄罗斯外交呈现为一项旨在获取更廉价燃料的努力,这无疑是一个额外的好处。

但无论这种政策组合在白宫看来多么合理,公众并不喜欢伊朗战争及其带来的高油价,也不喜欢迁就俄罗斯。在海湾地区迎合鹰派,在俄罗斯问题上迎合克制派,或许能将痛苦均匀地分摊到特朗普先生的联盟中,但从民调来看,这个联盟正在萎缩。特朗普先生的总统任期似乎正在进入一个全新的、且在他看来或许不那么令人满意的阶段。

---

总统试图将其外交政策目标与克制派及鹰派调和。

最终将分歧严重的 MAGA 联盟凝聚在一起的,是对特朗普先生的信仰,而非意识形态。在信徒看来,特朗普先生能够关闭边境,并铲除整个西半球的反美政府。他能够阻止毒品走私并瓦解贩毒集团。他能够将制造业回流,开启一个蓝领繁荣的金黄色时代。他能够扭转颓废与世俗化的浪潮。他能够击退那些干预政事的官僚和反美全球主义者的推进。他的手段有时可能看起来奇怪甚至令人反感,但没有人能像他那样交付成果。

为了维持这种迷之吸引力,特朗普先生必须让美国人和世界继续痴迷于“特朗普秀”的奇观。而且,他必须将灿烂的承诺与不可避免的令人失望的结果之间的差距降至最低。

战争使前者变得更容易,但使后者变得复杂。冲突能营造出极具吸引力的戏剧效果,没有人比特朗普先生更明白这一点。但事实证明,战争也很难进行舆论操纵。尽管总统做出了努力,俄罗斯与乌克兰之间的战争仍在继续升级。尽管他声称伊朗虚弱且无能为力,但汽油和柴油价格依然高企,且关于海湾地区美国基地在伊朗导弹面前脆弱性的报道依然存在。支持者们开始好奇:魔力在哪里?

幻灭始于缓慢,但会迅速传播。随着民调显示共和党在期中选举将面临艰难局面,“跛脚鸭”状态成为更令人担忧的问题,以及利率和通胀冲击选民,特朗普先生可能正面临其漫长职业生涯中最艰难的几年。这可能是一场孤独的斗争。不仅美国的对手希望他失败,我们的许多盟友也是如此。

“震撼与敬畏”式的外交政策提供了取得突破的希望,这将巩固总统的地位。世界应当为更多的“特朗普冲击”做好准备。他没有动力去平息局势。

加拿大应如何对抗特朗普

主街专栏

作者:William McGurn

安大略省,尼亚加拉-翁-得-莱克 “特朗普对加拿大的仇恨永久性地破坏了世界上最好的贸易关系。”

这是《埃德蒙顿日报》周六的一则头条新闻。考虑到总统倾向于通过将总理马克·卡尼(Mark Carney)称为“州长”、将该国称为我们的“第51个州”来贬低加拿大,这并不令人惊讶。

我们正处于一场始于 2025 年 2 月且毫无减弱迹象的贸易战之中。与此同时,魁北克党在上周的省议会选举中赢得了足够的席位

---

总理在玩一场受欢迎但自毁的关税报复游戏。

选举以组建一个分离主义少数派政府告终。而且看来,加拿大在石油资源丰富的阿尔伯塔省也面临着一场分离主义运动。

在这种背景下,特朗普先生可能是加拿大人唯一能达成共识的话题。

这并不是因为他受欢迎。总部位于英国的 Ashcroft Polls 调查发现,只有 $25\%$ 的加拿大人认为美国是盟友。这一比例低于 2022年乔·拜登担任总统时的 $73\%$。

对美加贸易战的焦虑正在增强对卡尼先生的支持。不幸的是,当他采取行动回应特朗普先生的攻势时,结果往往变成了加拿大版的保护主义——而当特朗普先生将这种保护主义针对加拿大人时,卡尼先生却正确地将其视为具有破坏性的。

这种模式是自毁的,而且具有“特朗普风格”。在特朗普对加拿大产品征收关税后,加拿大政府对价值近 300 亿加元$ billion 的美国商品征收了 25% 的报复性关税。随后,在 2025年 5 月,美国对汽车及零部件征收 25% 的税款。

今年早些时候,总统的这场战争遭受了打击,因为最高法院裁定,他根据 1977年的《国际紧急经济权力法》实施的大规模关税超出了其职权。特朗普政府随后援引了 1974年的《贸易法》。加拿大也进行了调整,并寻求与欧盟正式建立更紧密的经济关系。

这引发了一个问题:是否有加拿大人认为他们从这场反复的拉锯战中获益了?

答案肯定是否定的。总理显然认定,最好的应对方式,或者可能是唯一在政治上可行的方式,就是试图在“特朗普化”上胜过特朗普先生。至于总统,当记者上周询问中期选举前的贸易谈判时,他表示目前的贸易条款有利于加拿大,但这种情况正在改变:“最终会解决的,但我不知道——美国并不急于一时。”

总理马克·卡尼。

特朗普先生可能说对了,美国拥有更大、更强劲的经济体,能够比加拿大承受更多的痛苦。但这是一种零和思维。一个真正的贸易协议应该让所有参与方受益,其方式不应是瓜分市场,而应是让任何想要与跨境成年同意方买卖产品的人都能自由地这样做。

是的,各国都会作弊。但还没有人能找到一种在不给无辜旁观者带来不公平成本的情况下惩罚作弊者的方法。值得关注的是,在密歇根州与民主党人阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德(Abdul El-Sayed)进行激烈参议院竞选的共和党特朗普支持者迈克·罗杰斯(Mike Rogers)正在投放广告,提醒选民“加拿大不是敌人”。

关税本身已经足够愚蠢,而像卡尼先生那样用反制关税进行报复则更加愚蠢。他在 8 月份这样解释道:“加拿大将以一比一的金额匹配这些关税,以保护我们的工人企业。”

更好的应对方式是采取措施,确保由美国而非加拿大为 well 其低效和保护主义付出代价。这意味着要放开加拿大市场。

总部位于温哥华的弗雷泽研究所(Fraser Institute)的乔克·芬莱森(Jock Finlayson)和史蒂夫·格洛伯曼(Steve Globerman)写道:“报复性关税将增加加拿大家庭的生活成本,但不太可能削弱特朗普对关税的执念。事实上,特朗普政府可能会通过宣布针对加拿大各行业的额外市场准入限制,来回应任何渐进式的加拿大‘报复’。”

考虑到美国在加拿大经济中占据的巨大地位,这些关税对加拿大来说就更没有意义了。美国人是加拿大的 No. 1 客户,反之亦然。

特朗普先生在轻视加拿大时可能言辞犀利,比如嘲讽道“我们在任何事情上都不需要他们”。但请把这句话告诉那些依赖加拿大石油、电力和天然气的美国工业。这也是加拿大通过开放经济而非加入他的“胆小鬼博弈”来对抗特朗普先生会获得更好结果的另一个原因。

“加拿大拥有发达国家中最强大的私有财产权制度之一,”格洛伯曼先生表示。“它应该通过重大的企业税收和监管改革来利用这一优势——而他们已经开始这么做了。”

请发送邮件至 mcgurn@wsj.com。

政府有时也具有创新精神

作者:埃贡·林德雷尔(Egon Rinderer)

特朗普总统与顶尖人工智能高管上个月签署了一项自愿协议,该协议在很大程度上允许公司进行自我监管,且不对AI智能体的违规行为设定处罚。批评者认为,华盛顿正在允许该行业自行监管。这种观点不无道理。

在确保系统免受恶意智能体侵害方面,联邦政府远领先于私营部门。在我从事信息技术安全的37年里,大部分时间与联邦机构合作,直到现在,我才看到华盛顿在技术上引领行业。这一优势反映了联邦机构在过去二十年里不断加强其安全协议的成果。

如今最顶尖的网络防御被称为“零信任网络访问”(zero-trust network access)。一旦恶意AI智能体进入网络,它的移动方式与其他恶意软件相似。在进入一台机器后,它会尝试横向移动到下一台,搜寻数据、密码或可接管的其他系统。这种横向移动正是大多数严重网络漏洞扩散的方式。

在零信任方法下,设备之间不能仅仅因为处于同一网络就互相信任。

---

联邦机构在网络安全方面领先于工业界。

它们在每次连接时都必须证明自己已获得授权。其效果是在恶意智能体进入系统的瞬间将其遏制,使其没有扩散途径。

联邦机构承担着采用零信任安全基础设施的严格指令。五角大楼设定的截止日期是在2027财年年底前实现全面整合。

多项行政部门指令规定了机构修复网络安全漏洞的速度,以及对所用软件进行库存盘点的彻底程度。机构必须向白宫管理和预算办公室报告进度,如果未能达到目标,则面临失去资金支持的风险。

这些指南同样管辖采购。无法在分段网络中运行的软件很快将不再适用于联邦用途,且各机构正将这一要求写入未来的合同中。

工业界在几年前开始采用零信任方法,但工作陷入了停滞。我认为大多数大公司已经完成了80%的进度,但由于担心造成干扰和成本过高而停止了。

这是目光短浅的。公司正竞相在网络上部署AI智能体,而这些网络允许自由移动,这正是零信任架构旨在防止的。其结果将是更多的数据窃取和关键系统的中断。

企业虽不受自愿性政府指令的约束,但它们仍运行在现实世界中。联邦政府的零信任战略是公开的,且网络安全与基础设施安全局(CISA)提供了关于实施的额外指南。

虽然需要联邦层面的AI监管,但企业不应等待华盛顿的命令才开始严肃对待该技术的风险。当恶意AI智能体造成混乱时,媒体会急于将责任归咎于技术本身。但私营部门因未能加强防御而应承担部分责任。他们应该完成已经开始的工作。

林德雷尔先生是NinjaOne的联邦与企业增长高级副总裁,NinjaOne是一家端点管理和远程监控软件公司。

书架 / 作者:哈罗德·霍尔泽(Harold Holzer)

为联邦制造一名殉道者

《光荣的命运》(A Glorious Fate)

作者:凯文·M·莱文(Kevin M. Levin)

北卡罗来纳州出版,328页,$32.50

在爱德华·兹威克(Edward Zwick)的电影《光荣》(Glory)以及凯文·M·莱文关于罗伯特·古尔德·肖(Robert Gould Shaw)这部扣人心弦的传记的高潮部分——一名联邦军队的年轻白人上校率领他的黑人士兵穿过南卡罗来纳州海滩的一条狭窄地带,在1863年7月18日冲入来自看似坚不可摧的瓦格纳堡(Fort Wagner)的致命邦联军火力之中。任何看过1989年电影的人都知道接下来发生了什么:肖,这位出身于波士顿精英家庭、受过哈佛教育且仪表堂堂的后裔,在弹雨和炮火中倒下,跌入一堆黑人士兵的尸体之中。为了表达侮辱,邦联军将他与他的士兵们一起埋在一个浅浅的集体坟墓里。一名内战英雄就此死去,一名殉道者由此诞生。

很难想象有哪本书能比电影版本更生动地呈现这一场景,但莱文先生以极具风格的方式完成了这项任务。然而,真正提升《光荣的命运》一书水平的,是作者对肖复杂人格的揭示——包括他对奴隶制令人惊讶的漠不关心。与历史小说中那位拥有高尚原则的领导者不同,莱文先生呈现的是真实的、有缺陷的肖,一个比起“光荣”而言更趋于“虚荣”的年轻人。本书还坦率地探讨了肖死后围绕他而产生的神秘光环——这是一种经过精心计算的努力,旨在将其神圣化,以期在军队等级制度以及内战后的美国推动种族平等。

莱文先生是一位独立历史学家,他出版的Substack时事通讯《内战记忆》(Civil War Memory)在历史爱好者和学者中广受欢迎。他擅长戳破神话,尤其是关于黑人自愿在邦联军队中服役这一根深蒂固的误解。在《光荣的命运》中,他将注意力转向联邦军队中黑人士兵真实且重要的存在,以及首批招募黑人士兵的官方团之一:由肖指挥的马萨诸塞州第54步兵团,该团在瓦格纳堡那场灾难性的进攻中损失了一半的人员。作为几十年来出版的第一部关于肖的传记,它成为了最细腻的一部——在不影响推进叙事的同时,经常停下来进行分析,而叙事的高潮则发生在这位25岁的青年迎来其人生时刻之时。

肖于1837年出生在马萨诸塞州达特茅斯。他的富裕父母弗朗西斯和莎拉是热心的废奴主义者,曾先后迁往多个志同道合的社区。罗伯特年幼时,全家搬到了纽约州斯塔滕岛,他在家中和学校都过得很痛苦。在青少年时期,他产生了一种叛逆倾向,更多地体现在赌博、酗酒和挥霍无度上,而非废奴主义的理想主义。他在给纵容他的母亲的一封信中承认:“除了娱乐自己,我对任何事情都没有兴趣。”后来,在哈佛大学就读期间,他坦言:“我讨厌剑桥。”莱文先生将这个被娇惯的年轻人描绘成一个“顽固地以自我为中心”的男孩,他刻意与19世纪50年代后期哈佛年轻激进分子所拥护的废奴活动保持距离——而这几乎是肖命中注定要参与的事业。

那么人们不禁会问,肖是如何“重生”为黑人权利捍卫者的?莱文先生的答案是:他其实并没有。在分裂危机恶化时,肖告诉他失望的父母:“我并不总是谈论和思考奴隶制。”他几乎是在欢迎分裂,因为这给了他一个追求唯一真正热情之机会:在军队服役。

---

肖的父母拒绝了挖掘其遗骸的提议。在他们的心中,儿子没有比与他的黑人士兵同眠更好的安息之所。

肖的军事生涯始于纽约第七民兵团(该团由许多富裕家庭的子弟组成)的一名新兵,在1861年萨姆特堡遭到攻击仅一周后,他就奔赴战场。随后,肖成为了全白人组成的马萨诸塞第二步兵团的一名军官,曾在雪松山和安提塔姆参与战斗。莱文先生认为,直到最后,肖更关心的是“军事事务”,而非其父母所拥护的“道德十字军东征”。

当1863年黑人开始正式参军时,肖并未争取领导一支黑人士兵部队。这个机会之所以降临在他身上,是因为长辈肖夫妇拥有废奴主义者的资历。事实上,肖起初拒绝了这项委任,随后才改变主意。一位朋友后来回忆道,肖曾表达过疑虑,认为“黑人士兵……是否会在战斗线上作战”,并思考是否需要命令白人士兵在他们身后行军,用刺刀驱使他们前进。对于他在南方遇到的前奴隶,他所能表现出的最多只有一种家长式的作风,评论他们“完全无知,且对邪恶毫无认知”。

然而,这个起初漠不关心的肖,很快将他的新兵训练成了一支精干的战斗部队,并支持他们争取同工同酬。在波士顿港举行送行仪式后,肖与第54团向南进发。1863年6月,这位新晋上校反对参与洗劫和焚烧佐治亚州达里恩镇的命令。几周后,在南卡罗来纳州,肖同意率领他的部下对保护查尔斯顿市的炮台之一——武装强大的瓦格纳堡发起一次计划拙劣的进攻。莱文先生暗示,这次任务并非一项荣誉。一名《纽约论坛报》的记者后来报道称,他无意中听到两名高级指挥官用极其种族主义的语言达成一致,决定牺牲这些黑人士兵,其中一人还补充道,“我们早晚得除掉他们,不如现在就动手。”

在进攻前最后几分钟目击过肖的人描述他“决心完成任务,否则就死在战场上”。最终,他的死亡成为了他最大的成就。当他的父母拒绝了挖掘并接回其遗骸的提议——声明他们的儿子没有比与他的黑人士兵同眠更好的安息之所——肖从一名士兵蜕变为一个象征,受到诗人与艺术家的颂扬。即便在现在,他依然出现在波士顿公园中由奥古斯都·圣-高登创作的精湛浮雕作品里。正如一位19世纪随笔作家所言,无论是否心甘情愿,肖成为了“为了被奴役的种族,在自由祭坛上的一次自愿牺牲”。

霍尔泽先生是亨特学院罗斯福之家的主任,以及《诞生于此大陆:亚伯拉罕·林肯与美国移民》一书的作者。

评论与展望

如果沙特愿意战斗,美国可以提供帮助

美国区域联盟中的环节。

上周末,也门胡塞武装的导弹和无人机袭击令沙特阿拉伯陷入混乱。周六对国际机场的一次袭击造成13人死亡,300,多人受伤,导致利雅得上空空无一人;周日的一次袭击又造成一人死亡。现在,美国政策面临考验。

周六在被问及是否加入沙特针对胡塞武装的打击行动时,特朗普总统表示:“我们可能会。我们将研究这个问题。”然而,在期中选举之前,他似乎最不希望看到的是军事升级。这种犹豫可能正是伊朗及其提供武器和资金支持的胡塞武装代理人所期待的。

那么,建立一个包含以色列和阿联酋在内的区域反胡塞联盟如何?

美国可以让沙特在对抗伊朗轴心时自力更生,但这将付出巨大的战略代价。该地区正在观察,当其海湾联盟体系的基石遭受攻击时,华盛顿将如何应对。

这并不意味着要给利雅得开一张空白支票,而且美国拦截弹的短缺限制了特朗普先生在防御方面能提供多少帮助。但这场战斗不能仅靠防御来获胜,不能一直像“打地鼠”一样应对胡塞武装的发射物。这意味着需要转向进攻,在进攻方面,弹药储备更为充足,且需要美国的帮助来摧毁胡塞武装的地对空导弹。

美国的实时情报支持虽然较为隐秘,但同样重要。由沙特支持的也门政府攻势已经使胡塞武装在也门西海岸和红海走廊承受压力,但进展缓慢。

美国还可以继续通过外交手段集结一个区域反胡塞联盟,包括以色列和阿拉伯联合酋长国。胡塞武装威胁的是整个地区和国际航运,而不仅仅是沙特阿拉伯,且他们的行动是更大规模的伊朗战略的一部分。尽管胡塞武装与沙特的冲突早于当前的伊朗战争,但这场战争使沙特阿拉伯处于火力线前沿。伊朗可能认为它已经发现了这个薄弱的

情况本不必如此。西方最初的错误是在沙特-也门联盟将胡塞武装压制在防御状态时对其进行了限制。由于国际社会对平民伤亡的人道主义担忧,在2018和2019年,击败这个伊朗代理人的机会被错过了。2021年2月,新任拜登政府切断了对反胡塞攻势的所有支持——包括武器、情报和后勤。

为了迁就伊朗的权力,乔·拜登甚至取消了胡塞武装的恐怖组织认定。而这个组织的口号是:“真主至大,美国必死,以色列必死,诅咒犹太人,伊斯兰必胜。”随后,沙特达成了一项协议以安抚胡塞武装,包括通过资金输送来润滑和平进程。就像在加沙使用的卡塔尔资金一样,这没有奏效。胡塞武装利用喘息之机重新武装。

沙特在2025年的国防支出为830 亿美元 billion,超过了以色列或伊朗。在遭受直接攻击的情况下,利雅得现在必须决定是否有意愿反击。如果它没有,穆罕默德·本·萨勒曼(MBS)王储的所有现代化雄心都将受损。很少有人愿意投资于一个容易且重复被攻击的目标。

尽管土耳其和巴基斯坦拥有庞大的军队,但作为MBS新的麦加协议伙伴,它们似乎并不热衷于提供帮助。这使得像往常一样,只能向美国求助。美国的支持并不意味着替代沙特阿拉伯,而是帮助其发挥领导作用。相反,如果将MBS推向与胡塞武装达成另一项协议,将使该民兵组织在为下一场战争做准备时锁定其既得利益。

胡塞武装的挑战看似冷门,但对沙特、中东和美国而言,赌注很高。现在,这与特朗普先生针对伊朗的竞选以及他希望扩大以色列与阿拉伯国家之间的《亚伯拉罕协议》(希望有一天能将沙特阿拉伯纳入其中)紧密相连。就目前情况而言,胡塞武装占据上风。

读者来信

---

宪法原意主义与制宪者

萨缪尔·阿利托大法官强调了原意主义法官在应用该理论时所犯的错误(见 Oct. 3 的评论文章《即便原意主义法官也会犯错》)。但另一种错误可能出现在定义参考系上。在他看来,原意主义意味着“宪法条款应被理解为公众在这些条款被通过时所认同的含义”。这里的“公众”是指像殖民地酒馆顾客那样,聚集在一起通过报纸阅读拟议宪法的普通人。

问题在于,宪法并非由一个所有公民都是立法者的雅典式民主政体通过的。制宪者厌恶纯粹的民主,并选择建立一个基于代表制的共和国。立法机构任命了制宪者。因此,最相关且最实际的参考系应该是制宪者(其中签署者不足 50 人)认为这些条款意味着什么,而不是超过200万殖民地公民认为它们意味着什么。

阿利托大法官指出,“1868 年的普通公众或立法者”并不认为第14修正案中的“自由”包括同性婚姻。但这两种观点可能会产生分歧。根据所有记载,1787 年的普通公民将“轻罪”(misdemeanor)解释为一种轻微的犯罪,但仍然是犯罪,就像今天的普通公民一样。而制宪者则将“轻罪”理解为背信或滥用职权,并不一定构成任何犯罪。

在含义出现分歧的情况下,法律制定者对词汇的理解应当具有最高权威,

PROF. EM. MICHAEL J. POLELLE

伊利诺伊大学芝加哥法学院

佛罗里达州,萨拉索塔

---

古希腊的伟大建立在贸易之上

马可·鲁比奥在基于其雅典演讲摘要的评论文章《西方文明的诞生与重生》(Oct. 9)中,再次证明了在思想和内心深处,他比特朗普政府的任何其他高级官员都更像罗纳德·里根。但他忽略了雅典自由与伟大的一个主要来源,而里根很可能会将其放在核心位置——即雅典的自由、繁荣和权力是建立在国际贸易之上的。

正如威尔·杜兰特在其著作《希腊之生》(1939)中所解释的,贸易是雅典繁荣与成功的基石。他写道:“对外贸易的进展甚至快于国内贸易,因为希腊各城邦已经意识到了国际分工的优势,并且各自专注于某些产品;例如,盾牌制造者不再根据需求者的召唤在城市间奔波,而是在自己的作坊里制造盾牌,并将其发送到古典世界的市场。在一个世纪的时间里,雅典从家庭经济(每个家庭制造几乎所有需要的东西)转向城市经济(每个城镇制造几乎所有需要的东西),再转向国际经济(每个国家都依赖进口,并且必须通过出口来支付费用……正是这种贸易使雅典变得富有)。”

PHIL GRAMM 和 DONALD J. BOUDREAUX

美国企业研究院及

乔治梅森大学

德克萨斯州,赫洛茨;弗吉尼亚州,费尔法克斯

普京无视能源“停火”协议

俄罗斯与乌克兰之间的能源停火协议就这样化为泡影。特朗普总统周日在 Truth Social 上宣布了这项停战协议,并发出警告:“不要破坏它!”然而,弗拉基米尔·普京在几小时内就将其打破。

周日,一架“见证者”无人机击中了基辅的一座发电厂,俄罗斯方面还袭击了哈尔科夫的一座火力发电厂。乌克兰总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基在 Telegram 上写道:“这发生在美总统关于能源领域停火的声明之后。”

特朗普宣布

停战。俄罗斯

立即违约。

泽连斯基周一表示,乌克兰在夜间克制了对俄罗斯炼油厂的袭击,并且“如果俄罗斯愿意这样做,我们准备遵守任何能源停战协议”。而普京多次予以拒绝。

由于在乌克兰东部战场遭遇困难,这位俄罗斯独裁者正在增加对乌克兰城市和平民的空中袭击。战争研究所(ISW)上个月表示,俄罗斯自 2026 年 3 月以来取得的“进展几乎为零”。初夏,乌克兰人挫败了俄罗斯的南部进攻计划。而乌克兰的“春季行动”(Operation Vivaldi)目前已挫败了俄罗斯包围被称为“堡垒带”的东部防御据点的计划。

因此,ISW 本月表示,普京现在的计划是“让乌克兰的平民生活变得难以忍受,从而使乌克兰屈服于俄罗斯的要求”。普京正利用乌克兰爱国者导弹短缺以及 F-16 战机运行不足的局面,在漫长的冬季到来前猛击能源工厂。

特朗普将柴油价格上涨的责任推给乌克兰,并在周六表示,基辅“最好赶紧停止”对俄罗斯炼油厂的袭击。但乌克兰难道应该坐视不管,承受俄罗斯的闪击战吗?石油和天然气出口为普京的军队提供资金,俄罗斯的能源生产是合法的战争目标。

特朗普周五做出了重大让步,暂停了对柴油的制裁,这将允许俄罗斯能源公司攫取约 $4.5 亿。然而,就我们所见,普京没有给予他任何回报。俄罗斯拒绝接受能源停火协议,是最新的证据,表明特朗普的拉拢策略并未奏效。

加州有房子要卖给你

加州纳税人为经济适用房花费了数百亿美元,但几乎没有产生实际效果。然而,特殊利益集团希望选民在今年11月再出资数百亿美元,而且——听好了——还要建立一个州政府支持的住房贷款机构。这简直是虚假的希望战胜了经验的胜利。

加州房地产经纪人协会和工会正在支持第37号提案(Prop. 37),这是一项投票措施,旨在授权加州住房金融局发行 250 亿美元 billion 的政府债券,用于资助一项房屋首付款援助计划。另一项措施(第1号提案 / Prop. 1)则拟授权发行 112.5 亿美元 billion 的债券用于资助经济适用房。

该州希望选民允许其介入贷款补贴游戏。

支持者称首付款计划不会让纳税人多花一分钱,但这具有误导性。州政府将发行债券,为购买新建房屋的买家提供首付款贷款。贷款金额最高可覆盖房屋购买价格的 $17%,因此买家仅需支付 $3% 的首付。

该首付款贷款将作为第二抵押贷款,由买家随时间逐步偿还。虽然该计划表面上旨在帮助中等收入家庭,但年收入高达该地区中位数收入200%的买家,可能有资格购买价格高达 $1.500 万 的房屋。在硅谷,一个四口之家的中位数收入约为 $400,000。

既然联邦政府已经支持最低首付的抵押贷款,为什么还需要州政府的计划?联邦住房管理局(FHA)为首付3.5%的抵押贷款提供保险,不过借款人必须支付相当于贷款金额1.75%的保费,外加在贷款期限内每年约0.55%的费用。

政府赞助企业房利美(Fannie Mae)也为低收入家庭提供首付低至3%的抵押贷款担保,不过借款人通常必须支付更高的利率和保险费。加州的这项计划看起来像是为那些在虚高房价和当前利率环境下难以负担住房的相对富裕阶层提供补贴。

其思路似乎是,州政府的首付款贷款将消除买家在仅支付3%首付的情况下,根据联邦计划必须支付的更高利率。通过支付一项主要由州政府支持的第二抵押贷款资助的20%首付款,借款人可以获得较低的利率。

目前尚不清楚州政府能否在不亏损的情况下,以对借款人具有吸引力的利率提供首付款贷款。州政府或许能利用市政债券的免税优势发行债券,从而以低于市场水平的利率资助首付款贷款。目前,30年期免税市政债券的收益率约为 $5.7%。

但州政府仍需将贷款的管理和承销成本计算在内。由于首付款贷款次于第一抵押贷款,债券买家可能会要求更高的收益溢价。如果加州将首付款贷款的利率设定在资金成本之下,那么纳税人将不得不陷入为其提供补贴的境地。

无论如何,只要供应依然受限,补贴买家只会推高价格。第1号提案对此也无济于事。112.5 亿美元 billion 债券中的大部分将用于资助无家可归者住房和多家庭住房,由于政府建筑规范、现行工资要求和其他监管,这类住房的单套建设成本可能高达 100万美元。

自2018年以来,加州选民已批准了 120 亿美元 billion 的此类项目债券,此外还有近 200 亿美元 billion 的一般基金支出。然而,无家可归现象和住房成本却双双增加。希望选民有足够的智慧停止这场无休止的住房补贴骗局,并否决这两项提案。

市场迫使部分大学关闭也无妨

杰夫·亚斯(Jeff Yass)在10月9日的评论文章《向常春藤盟校投入资金无法解决其问题》中精准地指出了问题,但为了给新的学术尝试腾出空间,我们需要熊彼特式的“创造性破坏”,这对于美国及全球范围内竞争性私有企业资本主义的出现和胜利至关重要。像西尔斯(Sears)和东曼柯达(Eastman Kodak)这类标志性品牌的规模缩减或近乎消亡,有助于释放资源,为Anthropic、英伟达(Nvidia)、苹果(Apple)以及近期经济进步的其他领导者提供资金。

日益增长的关闭威胁正迫使一些现有大学在绝望中采取行动,削减行政臃肿,因为这种臃肿使他们偏离了发现和传播知识及创意想法的首要使命。一些机构还在考虑修改终身教授条款,甚至在重新审视昂贵的校际体育支出。劳动力市场正使像性别研究这样无法就业的专业对学生失去吸引力。一些学校要求教授

---

许可改革法案损害历史保护

如果许可改革如贵报社论所建议的那样通过(见10月6日《许可改革终于实现了,真的吗?》),它将象征着目前华盛顿正在形成的一种更大且令人不安的趋势——即公共政策和联邦行动缺乏清晰的流程、缺乏有意义的公众和利益相关者参与,且缺乏正确的判断。特别是许可改革法案中拟对1966年《国家历史保护法》(NHPA)进行的全面修改是前所未有的,且走得太远。如果通过,这些条款将摧毁我们国家的公民和文化遗产。拟议的修改必须被拒绝。我们渴望在10月15日庆祝《国家历史保护法》成立60周年——这是一部经受住时间考验并为我国做出贡献的基础性法律。我们的民选和任命官员应当对国家的遗产表现出更多的尊重。

布伦特·莱格斯(BRENT LEGGS)

总裁兼首席执行官

国家历史保护信托基金

华盛顿多教学,少为那些勉强能发表的期刊撰写文章。关于将四年制学士学位改为三年制的讨论正在增加。

由于大量的纳税人资金和私人慈善补贴,导致引导大学资源必要重新分配的市场信号被削弱,但这些信号依然存在并开始发挥作用。我认同亚斯先生对奥斯汀大学的热情,但我认为,几百所现有学校的消亡将吓到其余学校,促使它们减少意识形态驱动的“觉醒主义”(wokeness),转而专注于提高效率。

理查德·韦德(RICHARD VEDDER)荣誉教授

俄亥俄大学

俄亥俄州雅典市

---

马姆达尼对 10 月 7 日的回应

关于贵报 10 月 8 日发表的社论《庆祝 10 月 7 日的哈马斯》:我的母亲在奥斯威辛集中营幸存了下来。在她的一生中,她总会回到一个痛苦的问题上:“为什么我们在还有机会的时候没有逃走?”这是一个深知在离开欧洲可能依然可行时,曾存在过一个短暂窗口的人的反思。

在阅读贵报关于纽约市市长佐兰·马姆达尼(Zohran Mamdani)在袭击周年纪念日发表声明的社论时,我想到了我的母亲。虽然市长简短地承认了那一天的恐怖——包括那些被杀害和被劫持的人——但他的声明迅速转向了带有限定条件的政治背景,补充说这种苦难“并非始于那天,也不会终于那天”。

现在的纽约并非 20 世纪 30 年代的欧洲,我也绝不会淡化我母亲所经历的苦难。但她的人生教会我,人们并不总是能意识到世界何时开始发生转变。

10 月 7 日是一个屠杀之日。市长一年之中还有 364 天可以抱怨占领和种族灭绝。在这个周年纪念日,那种苦难应当独立存在。然而,他的言论让我不禁思考,我母亲当年的问题是否现在成了我的问题:我们是否应该考虑离开?

关于约瑟夫·C·斯特恩伯格(Joseph C. Sternberg) 10 月 9 日发表的专栏文章《法国的骚乱?这里也可能发生》(政治经济版):法国的债务危机是一个完美的例子,说明了当政治家们更关心如何保住工作而非履行职责时会发生什么。他们似乎没听过这样一句话:“当你身处深坑时,请停止挖掘。”

---

法国在继续深挖深坑

罗伯特·M·萨斯曼(ROBERT M. SUSSMAN)

亚利桑那州,天堂谷

拟发表的信函请发送至 wsj.ltrs@wsj.com。请附上您的城市、州和电话号码。所有信函均可能经过编辑,未发表的信函不予告知。

雅各布·埃尔博根(JACOB ELBOGEN)

纽约州,布鲁克林

---

胡椒……与盐

华尔街日报

“他需要从所有这些情感支持工作中休息一下。”

支持行刑队的理由

作者:亚历克斯·科津斯基(Alex Kozinski)

亚利桑那州在 2014 年 7 月 23 日成功处决了约瑟夫·鲁道夫·伍德三世(Joseph Rudolph Wood III),就在最高法院撤销美国第九巡回上诉法院此前发布的暂缓执行令的次日。该州在近两个小时内注射了 15 次咪达唑仑和氢吗啡酮。在当时,这是美国历史上耗时最长的一次处决。

这一记录现在已被克里斯塔·派克(Christa Pike)失败的处决所超越,她在接受两次戊巴比妥钠注射后幸存了下来,这显然让执行任务的田纳西州官员感到惊讶。人们只能希望这一令人不安的事件会促使人们重新审视我们持续半个世纪的致命注射实验,但我并不太确定。伍德的

---

致命注射仅在表面上显得人道,且它模糊了治愈与杀戮之间的界限。

这次处决引发了广泛的关注,包括在《60 Minutes》节目中对我(当时是第九巡回法院法官)的采访,但随后便再无进展。几乎所有实行死刑的州以及联邦刑事法典,都将致命注射指定为唯一或默认的处决方式。

情况并非一直如此。在20世纪的大部分时间里,各州使用绞刑、毒气室、电椅,偶尔使用枪决。随后,在1977年,俄克拉荷马州批准了致命注射。德克萨斯州在1982年处决查尔斯·布鲁克斯(Charles Brooks Jr.)时首次采用了这一方法。其他实行死刑的州很快也纷纷效仿。

RICK BOWMER / 美联社

为何会发生这种突然的转变?在“弗曼诉佐治亚州案”(Furman v. Georgia, 1972)中,最高法院因现有所有死刑法缺乏大法官们所设定的某些程序保障而将其废除,随后35个州重新修订了法律以采用这些程序。1977年,犹他州通过枪决处决了加里·吉尔摩(Gary Gilmore),这是暂停执行死刑后的首次处决。但反对者继续挑战处决行为(包括处决方式),认为其造成痛苦或具有侮辱性。

或许各州认为致命注射在法庭上会更有利,因为它像是一种熟悉的医疗程序。或许他们希望处决看起来不那么像中世纪的行径。无论如何,其吸引力是显而易见的:将囚犯放在担架上,连接导管,注射药物,然后引导公众想象死亡是干净且迅速地到来的,且没有任何人需要沾染鲜血。

然而,表象并非现实。无论从实际还是哲学角度来看,致命注射都是一个糟糕的选择。它借用了医学的外壳,却缺乏让医学发挥作用的人员和保障。美国医学会的伦理准则禁止医生参与处决;护士也面临类似的限制。因此,这项工作落到了执法人员身上,他们必须获取药物、寻找静脉、插入导管,并按正确的剂量和顺序注射药物。如果第一次尝试失败,他们会再次尝试。在伍德的案例中,尝试了14次。

供应问题使情况进一步恶化。药物制造商拒绝将产品出售用于处决。各州采取了类似“鲁布·戈德堡机械”般复杂的方案从国外获取药物,有时甚至采取欺骗手段,或者使用过期或存储不当的药物。州政府想要现代医疗程序的表象,却无法可靠地获得真实医学所需的材料或专业知识。

而且,目前还没有一种被认可的、能保证快速无痛死亡的方案。药企测试药物是为了治病,而不是为了杀人。各州在即兴尝试,有时使用已知会引起剧烈疼痛的药物,并施以镇静剂来减轻痛苦。镇静剂并不总是有效,而且有充分理由相信部分囚犯遭受了痛苦;派克女士实际上就告诉了我们这一点。多年来,发生了无数次失败的处决,法学教授科琳娜·莱恩(Corinna Lain)在她最近出版的《杀戮国家的秘密:致命注射不为人知的故事》(Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection)一书中详细记录了这些令人毛骨悚然的细节。

哲学上的问题则更为根本:通过致命注射进行处决是不诚实的。它给处决披上了令人安心的医学外衣,诱导我们将国家的杀戮误认为是一次临床事件。医学旨在延续生命,而处决则是终结生命。这种将截然相反的功能模糊化的做法,在认识论上是危险的,在道德上是令人厌恶的。

这就是为什么我赞赏国防部长皮特·海格塞斯(Pete Hegseth)决定用行刑队枪决尼达尔·哈桑(Nidal Hasan)。正如我在伍德被执行死刑时所主张的那样:“在近距离发射的八到十发大口径步枪子弹可以造成巨大的破坏,每次都能导致瞬间死亡。国家雇佣了大量能够扣动扳机且受过精准瞄准训练的人员。武器和弹药由国家出于执法目的大量采购,因此不可能拦截供应。而且没有人能争辩说这些武器被用于非预期用途:枪支除了摧毁目标之外没有其他用途。诚然,行刑队可能会造成混乱,但如果我们愿意执行死刑,就不应该掩盖我们在流人类血液这一现实。如果我们作为一个社会,无法忍受行刑队执行死刑时溅出的血迹,那么我们根本就不应该执行死刑。”

过去十年的时间强化了我的观点。尽管哈桑先生可能罪有应得,但没有人应该承受缓慢且可能是极其痛苦的死亡。对于是否建议直播执行过程,我持怀疑态度,但海格塞斯先生的坦诚以及他对哈桑先生的仁慈应当获得称赞。

科津斯基先生在 1985-2017 年期间担任第九巡回法院法官。

经济决定一切,傻瓜——但到底有多傻?

经济决定一切,傻瓜。

特约编辑

杰拉德·贝克 (Gerard Baker) 著

早在 1992 年詹姆斯·卡维尔 (James Carville) 将他那句著名的格言贴在比尔·克林顿 (Bill Clinton) 竞选总部墙上之前,选举成败的简化公式就已显而易见:民众的物质生活状况。

卡维尔先生的这句格言只是三组口号中的第二句(另外两句关于变革和医疗保健),但它因其在选举预测方面具有永恒的可靠性而引起共鸣。当经济糟糕时,现任者就会落败。

这是共和党预计下个月将遭遇惨败的主要预设解释。但现在与当时一样,驱动投票行为的可能是对经济的错误认知,而非经济现实;而且现在与当时一样,美国正处于经济黄金时代的早期阶段。

到那个 11 月美国人投票时,克林顿州长在辞令中利用的经济衰退早已结束。在 1992 年下半年,国内生产总值以 4% 的年率增长。失业率在那个夏天达到顶峰,并在新总统就职时大幅下降。

告诉选民他们的信念并非事实是令人反感的;但今天与当时一样,对于一个在宏观层面处于强健状态的经济,民众如此强烈的不满情绪,除此之外没有其他解释。

要最直观地感受民调与经济事实之间存在多大的脱节,可以将特朗普总统目前的支持率与他的前任在近期美国经济表现最低谷时的支持率进行对比。

最新的昆尼皮亚克 (Quinnipiac) 民调显示,特朗普先生在经济方面的支持率为 31%。2022 年 6 月,乔·拜登 (Joe Biden) 享有的——如果可以用这个词的话——支持率更高,为 33%。

那个月,消费者价格比一年前上涨了 9.1%,是 40 年来的最高通胀率。在当年的上半年,经济萎缩率略高于 1%。实际工资在下降:在 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间,经通胀调整后的每小时收入下降了 4.1%。30 年期抵押贷款利率几乎翻了一番,从 2.65% 上升到 5.1%。平均汽油价格翻了一倍多,从每加仑 2.39 美元上涨到 5 美元以上。在拜登任期的前 18 个月里,标准普尔 500 指数仅增长了 1%。失业率是唯一的亮点,为 3.6%。

---

正如 1992 年那样,民主党人正准备基于“时代艰难”的错误认知而赢得大胜。

与今日形成对比。消费者价格通胀率为 3.4%,虽自特朗普先生任期开始以来有所上升,但远低于四年前的水平。汽油价格和利率有所上涨,但涨幅不及民主党执政期间。自就职日以来,汽油价格上涨了约 65%,约为每加仑 \$5。抵押贷款利率为 7%,与特朗普先生就职时的水平几乎持平。

今年上半年,年均增长率超过 2.4%。亚特兰大美联储估计第三季度增长率为 3.6%。

实际工资有所增长。标准普尔 500 指数上涨了约 35%。失业率高于四年前,但 4.1% 的水平在历史上仍处于低位。

在 20 世纪 60 年代,亚瑟·奥肯(Arthur Okun)发明了“痛苦指数”(即通胀率与失业率之和),以此作为衡量经济成功的指标。根据该指标,拜登先生在 2022 年 6 月的分数为 12.7;特朗普先生目前为 7.5。即便我们创建一个增强版痛苦指数,将汽油价格、柴油价格和平均抵押贷款利率相加,拜登先生依然“领先”,分数为 29,而特朗普先生为 25。

几乎按照任何衡量标准,如今的经济状况都比四年前好得多,但现任者得到的评价却更低。

对此有几种合理的解释。选民们并不太在意过去两年通胀相对的放缓,而更在意价格持续的累积上涨。在经历了数十年的几乎零通胀之后,价格自 2020 年以来上涨了 25%。现任者为此付出了代价。选民们可能认为,特朗普先生的政策与他们目前面临的挑战之间的联系,比他们之前看到的拜登先生的政策联系更为清晰。关税以及推高能源价格的战争都直接导致了成本上升。此外,人们还感觉到,当前经济强劲带来的利益分配比往常更加不均。

然而,正如克林顿先生在人们对痛苦的误认中当选,并恰逢长期经济繁荣的开始一样,美国人将来可能会回顾 2026 年,将其视为一个长期繁荣时期的早期阶段。

增长正在加速。潜在的通胀压力正在减轻——在截至 8 月的一年里,剔除食品和能源的消费者价格上涨了 2.4%,低于特朗普先生就职时的 3.3%。人工智能投资热潮是增长的主要驱动力,如果投资者对其预期的生产力提升能够实现,增长可能会超过我们几十年来见过的任何水平。

这将赋予“经济,笨蛋”(the economy, stupid)这句话一个全新的含义。

宏观经济学的一次正确授奖

作者:大卫·R·亨德森 (David R. Henderson)

诺贝尔奖委员会在周一的一份声明中表示,罗伯特·霍尔 (Robert E. Hall) 和迈克尔·伍德福德 (Michael Woodford) 因“宏观经济稳定的微观经济基础”而被授予诺贝尔经济学奖。两位经济学家均为美国人。83岁的霍尔先生是斯坦福大学的经济学教授,也是胡佛研究所的高级研究员。70岁的伍德福德先生是哥伦比亚大学的经济学教授。

自从约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯 (John Maynard Keynes) 在1936年出版奠定了宏观经济学基础的经典著作《就业、利息和货币通论》以来,经济学家们一直在争论政府应如何稳定经济。凯恩斯认为,在失业率高企期间,政府应通过暂时增加政府支出或暂时降低税收,来增加对商品和服务的总需求。凯恩斯还认为,如果人们的收入增加,他们会将其增加额的一定比例用于消费。因此,消费支出可以将经济从衰退中拉回。后来的经济学家,包括1976年诺贝尔奖得主米尔顿·弗里德曼 (Milton Friedman),发现了凯恩斯这种简单想法中的问题。霍尔先生在弗里德曼的洞察基础上进行了构建。

弗里德曼在其1957年的著作《消费函数理论》中指出,人们不会仅根据当前收入来决定消费,而是会根据他所谓的“永久收入”——即对未来收入的预期——来进行消费。弗里德曼认为,由于临时减税对永久收入或长期收入的影响不大,因此此类减税对消费支出的提升幅度不会超过减税额的一小部分。

在1978年发表于《政治经济学杂志》的一篇论文中,霍尔先生更进一步。他认为消费取决于对未来收入的预期,这使得利用历史数据来预测消费变得困难。这证明了霍尔先生的观点,即消费者是前瞻性的。根据定义,人们对未来的预期无法被当前数据所捕捉。

1982年,霍尔先生与合著者弗雷德里克·米什金 (Frederic Mishkin) 共同开创了

华尔街日报。由道琼斯公司自 1889 年起出版

新闻集团执行主席

鲁珀特·默多克

新闻集团名誉主席

艾玛·塔克

总编辑

利兹·哈里斯,执行编辑

大卫·克劳,副总编辑

阿雅·惠特克-摩尔,副总编辑

莎拉·鲍尔,特写;埃琳娜·切尔尼,高级编辑;丹·科拉鲁索,商业、金融、经济;奇普·卡明斯,电讯;塔内斯·埃文斯,数字化;戈登·费尔克劳,国际;萨曼莎·亨尼格,多媒体;亚历克斯·马丁,印刷与写作;布鲁斯·奥尔沃尔,企业;达米安·帕莱塔,华盛顿;马塞洛·普林斯,调查报道

迈克尔·伍德福德的主要贡献在于货币政策。他 2003 年出版的著作《利率与价格》(Interest and Prices)被誉为央行行长的圣经。凯恩斯主义者(包括 1970 年诺贝尔奖得主保罗·萨缪尔森在内)认为,货币——

在罗伯特·霍尔最重要的著作中,包括他与阿尔文·拉布什卡合著的 1985 年书籍《单一税》(The Flat Tax)。霍尔先生和拉布什卡先生有力地论证了用单一税率取代现行所得税的必要性,并表明这比我们目前的税收制度更少扭曲且更有利于增长。

保罗·A·吉戈

编辑版编辑

杰拉德·贝克,特约编辑

罗伯特·汤姆森

新闻集团首席执行官

阿尔玛·拉图尔

首席执行官兼出版人

道琼斯管理层:

杰森·P·孔蒂,总法律顾问;戴安娜·德塞沃,首席人力资源官;阿尔特姆·费什曼,首席技术官;M·斯科特·海文斯,首席增长官;丹·夏,执行副总裁兼财富与投资总经理;阿肖克·辛哈,首席传播官;乔什·斯廷奇科姆,WSJ / 巴伦周刊集团执行副总裁兼首席营收官

编辑及公司总部:1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, N.Y., 10036 电话 1-800-DOWJONES

使用家庭层面的消费数据而非仅使用汇总数据,来研究诺贝尔委员会所称的“理性预期、永久收入假说”。他们发现 20% 的家庭生活在“勉强维持”的状态,但其余 80% 的消费行为与其前瞻性假说是一致的。

道琼斯 / 新闻集团 货币政策在将经济从衰退中提升出来方面是无效的。弗里德曼独立地以及与合著者安娜·J·施瓦茨共同证明了,无论好坏,货币政策是非常有效的。弗里德曼曾

---

迈克尔·伍德福德和罗伯特·E·霍尔在米尔顿·弗里德曼对约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯的批判基础上进行了构建。

专注于货币供应量。伍德福德先生展示了美联储如何通过设定联邦基金利率目标来影响经济。正如胡佛研究所经济学家约翰·科克伦所指出的,以经济学家约翰·泰勒命名的“泰勒法则”是伍德福德先生所开发框架的核心。根据该法则,为了降低通货膨胀,美联储应当激进地提高利率。

诺贝尔委员会表示,授予该奖项是为了“证明如何通过重建经济模型来振兴稳定政策”。但这遗漏了两点重要内容。首先,霍尔先生关于消费的研究表明,使用凯恩斯主义财政政策将不起作用。其次,霍尔先生和伍德福德先生的研究都表明,政府政策(尤其是货币政策)有时会出错并导致不稳定。诺贝尔委员会有一种遗憾的倾向,即含蓄地将几乎所有经济不稳定问题归结为经济体本身,而几乎不将任何问题归结为糟糕的政府政策。幸运的是,今年获奖者的研究抵消了这种倾向。

亨德森先生是斯坦福大学胡佛研究所的研究员,也是《简明经济百科全书》的编辑。

仪式能提供医学无法提供的东西

作者:玛丽亚·巴尔哈拉 (Maria Balhara)

父母守在孩子的病床边,其他家人在附近静静地伫立。这个孩子无法康复。

父母如何与孩子告别?当医学达到极限时,谁能陪伴在侧?医院里到处是面对这些问题的人。临床医生在患者去世后陷入沉默。院牧在新生儿重症监护室进行紧急洗礼。护士为悲痛的家庭保留手印和脚印。在拔管期间,病床边会播放音乐。在进行艰难的谈话之前,护理团队会在房间外静静地聚集。

我逐渐意识到,许多此类实践具有传统上与仪式相关的特征:象征性行动、重复,以及对通常涉及不确定性、脆弱性或死亡的过渡阶段的标记。

在现代医学——一个基于科学和技术专业知识的领域——中,将这些实践称为“仪式”可能感觉很奇怪。但严重疾病对患者及其亲属的影响不仅仅是生理上的。想想那些必须在为无法说话的患病孩子做决定时,同时应对不确定性和预见性悲痛的父母。

仪式化的实践帮助患者、家庭和临床医生承认那些在情感和道德上具有重要意义但难以表达的现实。

作为一名院牧实习生,我进入医院时预期会在明显的宗教环境中遇到仪式。但我发现它交织在平凡的临床生活之中。即使是那些不认为自己有宗教信仰的人,也参与其中。

一名医生在传达毁灭性的消息之前,坐下来与患者平视交谈。一名护士请求精神关怀团队静静地探访一名濒死孩子的母亲。这些仪式无法终结疾病或痛苦,但它们并非无关紧要。它们传递了庄重感、尊重以及对人类共同脆弱性的认可。

此类实践允许临床医生承认其工作中承受的情感和道德压力。从这个意义上说,仪式并非存在于医学之外,而是医疗实践中人性不可或缺的一部分。

巴尔哈拉女士是宾夕法尼亚大学的哲学专业学生,也是费城儿童医院的学生院牧。

祝贺

我们的 2026 年度

最佳供应商合作伙伴。

你们在创新、专业知识以及对质量和价值的奉献精神方面,对于我们如何服务客户至关重要。当我们共同协作时,伟大的事情就会发生。

metabo HPT

[⚠ 低质量翻译,建议复核] 全球票房最高的10部汤姆·克鲁斯电影 | 电影名称< / > 票房(单位:10亿美元)< / >< / > 壮志凌云:独行侠< / > < / >< / > 碟中谍6:全面瓦解< / > < / >< / > 碟中谍4:幽灵协议< / > < / >< / > 碟中谍5:红隼< / > < / >< / > 碟中谍:最终清算< / > < / >< / > 世界大战< / > < / >< / > 碟中谍7:致命清算(上)< / > < / >< / > 碟中谍2< / > < / >< / > 碟中谍< / > < / >< / > 最后一名武士< / > < / > |

商业与金融

© 2026 道琼斯公司。保留所有权利。

\* \* \* \* \* \*

华尔街日报。

标准普尔 7807.24 ▼ 0.06%

2026年10月13日,星期二 / B1

更多详情请访问 WSJ.com / Markets

FTX资产成为AI热潮的一部分

此前被视为糟糕投资的各项持仓重新引起关注

作者:ALEXANDER OSIPOVICH

在萨姆·班克曼-弗里德的加密货币帝国崩溃后,一家看似已死掉的比特币挖矿企业正被重新激活,以服务于人工智能的建设。

这家此前名为 Genesis Digital Assets 的公司多年来一直陷入 FTX 的破产程序中。今年夏天,它被 SWI Group 接管。SWI Group 是一家数字基础设施公司,一直在美国和欧洲收购数据中心,以服务于渴望计算能力的 AI 公司。

周一宣布,已筹集 €8 亿(约 9亿美元),用于资助其数据中心的升级和扩建。在交易公布后,这家在阿姆斯特丹上市、在新加坡注册的公司股价上涨了 16%,使其市值达到约 69 亿美元 billion。

“我们需要资金来部署更多的计算能力,” 的联合创始人兼首席执行官 Max-Hervé George 表示。他补充说,他对比特币挖矿“毫无兴趣”。

他的公司感兴趣的是:随 Genesis Digital 一起收购的位于德克萨斯州、北卡罗来纳州、南卡罗来纳州和瑞典的数据中心。 希望将这些中心提供给所谓的“超大规模运营商”——如亚马逊网络服务(AWS)或谷歌云(Google Cloud)等云计算提供商,这些公司为 ChatGPT 及类似 AI 工具提供了大部分计算火力。

虽然 Genesis Digital 最初专注于在哈萨克斯坦进行比特币挖矿,但后来撤出了这个中亚国家。George 表示, 正在出售其在哈萨克斯坦最后剩余的资产,即一组由三个小型比特币挖矿站点组成的资产。

比特币挖矿涉及运行程序以解决复杂的数学方程,从而产生新的数字货币单位。最初由爱好者在个人电脑上完成,最终发展成为一项大生意,公司们积累了大量英伟达(Nvidia)芯片,以工业规模挖掘比特币。

近期,许多此类公司已转向 AI 领域,因为 AI 承诺带来更丰厚的回报。

George 是一位 37 岁的法国企业家,最初投资于不良房地产,随后转向数据中心。

但在他处理过的资产中,很少有像 Genesis Digital 这样历史如此棘手的。

该公司由一群德国和哈萨克斯坦企业家于 2017 年创立,成长为全球最大的比特币矿工之一。

班克曼-弗里德从 2021年开始参与其中。他最终通过其加密货币交易公司 Alameda Research 向 Genesis Digital 投资了超过 10 亿美元 billion,最终持有该公司 20% 的股份。Alameda 与 FTX 紧密交织。

到 2022年 11 月 FTX 申请破产时,Genesis Digital 正深陷比特币价格暴跌以及哈萨克斯坦的敌意之中——请翻至 B2 页

《挖掘者》失利颠覆克鲁斯的奥斯卡之梦

作者:约翰·尤根森 (JOHN JURGENSEN)

以及 埃丝特·祖克曼 (ESTHER ZUCKERMAN)

这部高概念讽刺片在成本高达 1.25亿美元 的情况下,首映周末的美国国内票房仅售出 $800 万。

今年 6 月,汤姆·克鲁斯最新电影的首次预告片以一段令人惊讶的序幕亮相——一段涵盖其整个职业生涯的高光集锦。

这段 2.5 分钟的展示呈现了这位全球最大电影明星的戏路之广与个人魅力,并在一段来自《碟中谍》系列电影的台词中达到高潮:“你所做的一切都为了这一刻。”

画面随即切换到克鲁斯在《挖掘者》(Digger)中饰演的一位夸张的石油大亨,他全身包裹在特效化妆中,说着德克萨斯州的方言,并用手指比划成枪的样子开火。YouTube 上的热门评论之一是:“我的哥们儿要来拿奥斯卡了。”

然而,《挖掘者》却遭遇了惨败。

这部由编剧兼导演亚历杭德罗·冈萨雷斯·伊纳里图执导的高概念讽刺片,制作成本约为 1.25亿美元,但在首映周末于 3,300 多家美国国内影院仅售出 $800 万 的门票。

这引发了自 2017年《木乃伊》以来,克鲁斯发行的电影从未被“票房炸弹”和“惨败”等标题所困扰的局面。这也让此前看似必然的奥斯卡奖之行变得充满变数——并使得那段庆祝职业生涯的蒙太奇剪辑显得过于操之过急。

“那时感觉他们太努力地想帮汤姆拿到提名了,”好莱坞营销资深人士丹尼斯·赖斯(Dennis Rice)表示。他在 21 世纪初克鲁斯帮助振兴联合艺术家工作室(United Artists)期间曾与克鲁斯共事。

克鲁斯持有的一项吉尼斯世界纪录是:演员连续出演票房突破 1亿美元 电影数量最多(11 部)。他执行了其他演员绝不敢考虑的电影特技。他经常被地称为“最后一位电影明星”。在演技方面举起那座金色奖杯,是克鲁斯尚未实现的极少数好莱坞里程碑之一。

“那是他的珠穆朗玛峰,”即将出版该明星传记的作者杰夫·贝内迪克特(Jeff Benedict)说道。

克鲁斯曾获得三次演技提名:分别是在《四月四日出生》(Born on the Fourth of July,1989 年)中饰演一名激进的、使用轮椅的越南战争退伍军人,在《一个叫杰瑞·马奎尔的人》(Jerry Maguire,1996 年)中饰演一名积极进取的体育经纪人,以及在《木兰花》(Magnolia,1999 年)中饰演一名励志大师。他还作为《壮志凌云:独行侠》(Top Gun: Maverick,2022 年)的制片人获得了最佳影片提名。

然而,他实际拥有的唯一一座奥斯卡奖杯是表彰其 45 年职业生涯的荣誉奖。去年在接受该奖项时,他表示:“拍电影不是我的工作,而是我的生命。”

尽管他在 2020 年代致力于视觉奇观,但克鲁斯自 20 世纪 80 年代起就证明了自己作为一名严肃且具备获奖实力的演员的戏路,当时他在《金钱至上》(The Color of Money)中饰演保罗·纽曼的配角,在《雨人》(Rain Man)中饰演达斯汀·霍夫曼的配角。(两部电影的主演均凭借其表演获得了奥斯卡奖。)

随后,他在受人尊敬的导演斯坦利·库布里克的《大开眼界》(Eyes Wide Shut)中展现了心理性欲的转变;在《热带惊雷》(Tropic Thunder)中大胆尝试纯喜剧,甚至戴上了秃顶帽;以及在《杀手》(Collateral)中饰演冷酷的反派,这些表演为他赢得了评论界的尊重。

然而,电影艺术与科学学院从未买账。“我相信汤姆是我们行业最伟大的演员之一,但因为他同时也是一名商业演员,他有时无法获得认可——

请翻至 B2 页

来源:Rentrak

年金购买者起诉沃尔特旗下保险公司

作者:HEATHER GILLERS

道奇队老板马克·沃尔特(Mark Walter)旗下的保险公司正面临由购买其年金产品的高龄群体发起的接连诉讼。

周一提交的一项诉讼是至少第三起指控沃尔特及其保险公司基于虚假陈述和虚假承诺销售年金的案件。这些诉讼由寻求代表更大规模保单持有者的集体诉讼律师发起。此前,沃尔特的两家保险公司在6月披露,由于未能报告其投资组合中有多少资金以贷款形式部署到与沃尔特体育及金融帝国相关的其他公司,它们正接受联邦调查。

洛杉矶地区的一名退休人员里克·菲利普斯(Rick Phillips)于周一提起诉讼,要求沃尔特旗下的两家保险公司——Clear Spring和Gainbridge——允许保单持有者在无需支付违约金的情况下解除年金合同,或者补偿他们支付的金额与该公司若在关联投资规模方面坦诚相待可能不得不接受的较低价格之间的差额。

年金产品的设计初衷是为了吸引依赖固定收入且风险承受能力较低的老年人。指数年金为保单持有者提供类似于股市收益的潜力,在过去十年中人气激增,从而推动了替代资产管理公司的私人贷款业务。

周三,佛罗里达州戴维市一名76岁的居民罗伯特·卡林斯基(Robert Kalinsky)针对Clear Spring和另一家沃尔特旗下的保险公司Delaware Life提起了一项单独诉讼,同样指控其虚报关联资产规模。另一名Delaware Life的年金保单持有者艾拉·罗斯纳(Ira Rosner)在上个月也提交了自己的诉讼。

沃尔特的企业集团TWG Global表示,其华尔街公司古根海姆合伙公司(Guggenheim Partners)及其保险公司均不存在欺诈行为。

保险公司的母公司Group 1001的一位发言人表示,该公司已知晓近期的诉讼。“目前还没有任何法院裁定Group 1001 Insurance或Delaware Life Insurance Company有任何过错,我们将根据我们服务保单持有者的诚信长期记录,坚定地为本案辩护,”该公司表示。

Delaware Life和Clear Spring在6月披露,它们严重低估了其在所谓的

信用评分转变冲击抵押贷款

作者:JASMINE LI

以及 ANNAMARIA ANDRIOTIS

几十年来,FICO信用评分在决定许多美国人能否拥有住房方面发挥了关键作用。现在,抵押贷款行业正在采用另一项指标。

监管机构和贷款机构最近允许在抵押贷款审核决策中使用VantageScore,后者是由信用报告公司Equifax、Experian和TransUnion共同成立的合资企业。这是联邦住房金融局(FHFA)打击Fair Isaac公司在规模达$13 trillion的抵押贷款市场中近乎垄断地位的最新举措——这一行动导致该公司股价今年下跌了约60%。

FHFA是房利美(Fannie Mae)和房地美(Freddie Mac)的监管机构,这两家机构为市场的大部分贷款提供担保,因此设定了住房贷款的标准。FHFA负责人比尔·普尔特(Bill Pulte)和特朗普总统一直试图降低抵押贷款成本并提高住房负担能力,

SZWARC HENRI / ABACA / ZUMA PRESS

旨在应对中期选举前攀升至多年最高水平的抵押贷款利率。政府表示,信用评分的变更将使获得抵押贷款变得更容易且成本更低。

据一名知情人士透露,普尔特还计划对该行业采取更多措施,包括更改长期以来关于信用报告的要求。

“我们不在乎谁赢,”普尔特9月下旬在X平台上表示,“我们只是希望[FICO]和Vantage能够竞争——而不是成为一个卡特尔或滥用权力的垄断者。”

提高购房负担能力是一项艰巨的任务,充满了潜在的陷阱和意外后果。到目前为止,市场将评分变更视为风险增加,且有早期迹象表明,这导致部分抵押贷款的利率上升。

FHFA、房利美和房地美在声明中均表示,这些变更将使信用评分现代化。请转到B2页

汽车

技术领先的

中国汽车正成为

巴黎车展的亮点。B3

科技

约会软件公司

Bumble正在洽谈

私有化,交易估值

约为10 亿美元 billion。B4

合并失败后,艾伯森超市要求克罗格超市支付80 亿美元 billion

股价表现,过去五年

作者:PATRICK THOMAS

在两年前的一项大型杂货店合并交易破裂后,超市连锁店艾伯森超市(Albertsons)希望其最大竞争对手克罗格超市(Kroger)向其支付至少80 亿美元 billion。

根据周一解密的法院文件,艾伯森超市指责克罗格超市的领导层向联邦监管机构提供“低价方案”,旨在让合并后的公司在很大程度上保留利润最高的门店,而将表现较差的门店剥离。

该文件是艾伯森超市在两家公司交易失败后,在特拉华州衡平法院(Delaware Chancery Court)对克罗格超市提起诉讼的一部分。庭审定于Oct. 19开始,预计程序将持续约两周。

艾伯森超市表示,其正寻求总额高达93 亿美元 billion的损失合并溢价和利息。该金额包括克罗格超市尚未支付的$600 million分手费。

数据来源:FactSet

克罗格超市表示,艾伯森超市的论点存在“致命缺陷”,且两家公司都知道该交易面临严峻的监管审查。该公司在法院文件中表示:“克罗格超市无法采取任何能改变结果的措施。”

此次审判反映了克罗格超市和艾伯森超市在四年间从行业竞争对手到潜在合并伙伴,再到重新成为竞争对手的历程。

自交易破裂以来,两家公司都陷入困境。杂货商正受到成本上涨的冲击,而资金紧张的购物者则在削减

---

企业索引

本索引列出了今日版面中大多数母公司和商业人士的重要参考页码。区域插页中的文章未列入本索引。

A

Airbnb B10

艾伯森超市 (Albertsons) B1

亚马逊 (Amazon.com) A11,B2,B10

美国航空 (American Airlines) A11

B

Beyond Meat B4

黑石 (Blackstone) B4

Booking B10

Bumble B4

比亚迪 (BYD) B3

C

奇瑞汽车 (Chery Automobile) B3

D

达美航空 (Delta Air Lines) A11

E

Equifax B1

Expedia B10

Experian B1

F

Fair Isaac B1

福特汽车 (Ford Motor) B3

G

吉利汽车 (Geely Automobile) B3

Getty Images B4

广州汽车 (Guangzhou Automobile) B3

H

爱马仕 (Hermès) B5

希尔顿全球 (Hilton Worldwide) B10

I

IonQ公司 (IonQ) B5

K

开云集团 (Kering) B5

Keurig Dr Pepper B4

克罗格超市 (Kroger) B1

L

理想汽车 (Li Auto) B3

Lucid B3

LVMH B5

Lyft A3

M

万豪 (Marriott) B10

Match B4

Meta平台公司 (Meta Platforms) B3,B10

N

英伟达 (Nvidia) B1

R

Rocket B2

S

上汽集团 (SAIC Motor) B3

赛力斯 (Seres) B3

Seven & i B4

西南航空 (Southwest Airlines) A11

SpaceX A3

斯特兰蒂斯 (Stellantis) B3

SWI B1

T

特斯拉 (Tesla) B3

TransUnion B1

U

Uber Technologies A3

联合航空 (United Airlines) A11

UWM B2

V

大众汽车 (Volkswagen) B3

W

沃尔玛 (Walmart) B2

X

小鹏汽车 (XPeng) B3

Z

零跑汽车 (Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology) B3

---

人物索引

A

Antonio, William A10

B

Banfield, Bill B2

萨姆·班克曼-弗里德 (Bankman-Fried, Sam) B1

Bernard, Adam B3

Brown, Ethan B4

Buchta, Scott B2

C

Cabanis, Cecile B5

Chesky, Brian B10

Clarke, Richard B10

D

Dacus, Stephen B4

F

Foran, Greg B2

G

Gawrelski, Ken B10

George, Max-Hervé B1

Gupta, Ravi B4

H

罗伯特·霍尔 (Hall, Robert E.) A2

Hegeman, John B4

Hunt, Hunter A10

K

Kang, Clifford B3

L

Leyva, Mauricio B4

M

Marshall, John A2

Masi, Niccolo de B5

Mazzola, Joe A2

Miller, Andrew A10

马斯克 (Musk, Elon) A3

N

Nan, Alex B3

S

Seiberg, Jaret B2

Smith, Desmond P B2

U

Ulzheimer, John B2

W

马克·沃尔特 (Walter, Mark) B1

Wang, Alexandr B3

Weiss, Emily B4

Winebrenner, James B5

Wolfe Herd, Whitney B4

迈克尔·伍德福德 (Woodford, Michael) A2

X

Xiaopeng, He B3

Z

扎克伯格 (Zuckerberg, Mark) B3

Zyciora, Klaus B3

年金买家起诉保险公司

接 B1 页

,在第一季度的申报文件中披露了其关联资产。根据《华尔街日报》基于州保险申报文件的计算,当这两家保险公司重新陈述这些数字时,其存放于关联投资中的持仓比例从个位数百分比分别上升至 Clear Spring 的 $59% 和 Delaware Life 的 $42%,这些公司表示,在受到纽约联邦检察官和美国证券交易委员会(SEC)调查后,它们才发现了其关联投资的规模。Gainbridge 在申报文件中表示,它正在配合调查人员进行调查。

关联持仓可指贷给关联公司的资金,或由关联公司出售但由其他借款人担保的投资。存放在 Delaware Life 和 Clear Spring 这些投资中的资金代表了数十万美国人的储蓄,其中包括菲利普斯(Phillips)和卡林斯基(Kalinsky)。三家保险公司的母公司 Group 1001 Insurance 表示,截至 2024 年年底,该公司拥有近 500,000 份有效的年金合同。

根据诉状,罗斯纳(Rosner)是在 Delaware Life 收到联邦检察官的传票之后,但在该保险公司披露其正接受调查之前购买的年金;当他得知该调查时,他提前套现,并为此支付了罚金。卡林斯基退保了一份年金,并继续持有另外两份。这两起诉讼均由佛罗里达州博卡拉顿的一家名为 Robbins, Geller, Rudman and Dowd 的律所提交至佛罗里达州南区法院。

菲利普斯持有一份来自 Clear Spring 的年金和多份来自 Gainbridge 的年金。他曾出现在一篇关于持有沃尔特旗下保险公司保单的年金领取者的《华尔街日报》文章中。负责提起此案的律师、总部位于圣路易斯的 Korein Tillery 律所的乔治·泽尔克斯(George Zelcs)在《日报》上读到关于他的报道后联系了菲利普斯,并在 Clear Spring 设有办事处的印第安纳州南区法院提起诉讼。

这并非马克·沃尔特及其公司首次面临年金买家的法律投诉。2014年,两名保单持有人对由他担任首席执行官的 Guggenheim Partners 及其几家关联保险公司提起了一项集体诉讼。他们指控 Guggenheim 将这些保险公司变成了“现金机器”,利用保单持有人的资金来收购道奇队。

克鲁斯的奥斯卡之梦受挫

接第 B1 页

莱斯表示,他应该获得相应的认可。

然而,在过去的十年里,克鲁斯已达到某种崇高地位,这不仅是因为他在 64 岁时仍是一位长青的电影明星,更因为他是电影院观影体验的坚定推动者,尤其是在《壮志凌云:独行侠》帮助人们在疫情停摆后重返电影院的那段时间。

《挖掘者》(Digger)并不像典型的“奥斯卡诱饵”那样容易被接受。克鲁斯饰演的大亨角色围绕着由其钻探引发的全球大灾难展开叙事,将喜剧元素包裹在电影关于气候危机的阴郁信息之中。此外,这部电影还依赖于一个由华纳兄弟(Warner Bros.)极力保密的重大反转,这使得全面讨论克鲁斯的表演变得具有挑战性。

“我认为他选择了你能选到的风险最高的一个项目,”电影评论家、克鲁斯传记作者艾米·尼科尔森(Amy Nicholson)表示,“如果说有一种类型在上映当年总是显得举步维艰,那就是尖锐的当代气候变化讽刺剧。”

为了反击针对该片的大量负面评论,华纳兄弟制作了广告,将评论家的观点(如“宏伟的”、“难以忍受的”)并列在一起,以此向潜在购票者传递“由你决定”的信息,试图吸引观众。华纳兄弟未回应置评请求。

这部电影也有其拥护者,以及越来越多名人支持者的加入,从简·方达(Jane Fonda)到曼迪·帕廷金(Mandy Patinkin)。安妮·海瑟薇(Anne Hathaway)是克鲁斯在 1990 年电影《雷霆之日》(Days of Thunder)即将推出的续集中的搭档,她在以电影为中心的社交应用 Letterboxd 上发布了“热爱这部天才电影”的评论,并给《挖掘者》打五星。

这种好莱坞内部的支持意味着奥斯卡提名仍然有可能,尽管现在获胜的可能性似乎变得更加困难。

在最佳男主角的竞争中,他面临着激烈的挑战,竞争对手包括凭借夏季首映的《奥德赛》(The Odyssey)入围的马特·达蒙(Matt Damon),以及即将出战的竞争者约翰·马尔科维奇(John Malkovich,出演《野马九号》)和安德鲁·斯科特(Andrew Scott,出演《埃尔西诺》)。

FTX 资产引发新关注

接第 B1 页

斯坦,当地政府因比特币矿工大量耗电而对其产生反感。

在去年针对这家比特币矿业公司提起的一项诉讼中,管理 FTX 破产事宜的团队称,Genesis Digital 是“班克曼-弗里德最鲁莽的投资之一”,并寻求追回 Alameda 投入的 11.5 亿美元 billion。

SWI 集团首席执行官马克斯-埃尔韦·乔治(Max-Hervé George)。

的管理人认为,Genesis Digital 在哈萨克斯坦的资产“几乎毫无价值”,而其在美国的资产“仅值班克曼-弗里德支付金额的一小部分”。

在 6 月 15. 撤回了诉讼。同一天,SWI 宣布斥资 5亿美元 收购 Genesis Digital 的大量股份。此后,它扩大了持股比例,成为该公司的多数股东。

乔治表示,所有与 SWI 及其他股东相关的法律纠纷均已解决。

班克曼-弗里德在被判定欺诈后,目前正在服 25 年监禁。

如今,回看他的一些投资,似乎比 倒闭以及检察官指控他挪用数十亿美元客户资金进行挥霍时看起来要好得多。

值得注意的是,他在 2021, 向 Anthropic 投资了 5亿美元,在 AI 热潮使其成为家喻户晓的名字之前, SWI 持有这家初创公司 7.8% 的股份。

破产财产管理方在 2024. 以 13 亿美元 billion 的价格出售了其在 Anthropic 的股份。根据这家 AI 公司最近的估值,该股份现在的价值约为 750 亿美元 billion。

艾伯森超市寻求 80 亿美元 Billion 赔偿

(接 B1 页)关于他们的习惯,并转向竞争对手的折扣店。

周一,克罗格超市(Kroger)表示,计划在未来三年内裁员 3,000 人,这将使其公司总员工人数减少超过三分之一。首席执行官格雷格·福兰(Greg Foran)在给员工的一封信中表示,克罗格正在利用包括人工智能在内的新技术,以更少的人员完成更多工作。他说:“我们公司的层级过多,交接过多,管理开支也超过了实际需要。”

一家位于凤凰城的艾伯森超市(Albertsons)门店。该零售商此前拟与克罗格超市合并的计划于 2024 年破裂。

艾伯森超市的股价在过去 12 个月中下跌了约 30%,使其市值降至约 60 亿美元 billion。

克罗格在 2022 年同意以 200 亿美元 billion 收购艾伯森超市,这将使美国门店数量排名第一和第二的超市连锁店合并。合并后的公司将拥有近 5,000 家门店,涵盖克罗格旗下的 Fred Meyer、Roundy's 和 Mariano's,以及 Safeway、Vons 和 Jewel-Osco 的所有者。

其目标是打造一个规模更大的杂货竞争者,以对抗沃尔玛(Walmart)和亚马逊(Amazon)等巨头零售商,以及 Aldi 等折扣杂货店,因为后者拥有足以压低超市货架价格的规模和议价能力。

为了缓解对该交易的担忧,两家公司提出向杂货分销商 C&S Wholesale Grocers 出售数百家门店。美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)于 2024 年提起诉讼以阻止该交易,称竞争的减少将导致杂货价格上涨。

俄勒冈州波特兰的一名联邦法院法官随后以反垄断为由阻止了该交易。在裁决后的第二天,艾伯森超市起诉其前交易伙伴,指控克罗格未能采取足够措施获得监管批准。克罗格则表示,艾伯森超市无权获得分手费。

俄勒冈州波特兰的一名联邦法院法官随后以反垄断为由阻止了该交易。在裁决后的第二天,艾伯森超市起诉其前交易伙伴,指控克罗格未能采取足够措施获得监管批准。克罗格称艾伯森超市的指控毫无根据,并表示该公司无需支付分手费。

两家公司在交易相关成本(包括律师费和咨询费)上的支出均约为 10 亿美元 billion。

艾伯森超市在法庭文件中表示,克罗格的管理层优先考虑保留那些在完成收购艾伯森超市 2,000 多家门店的交易后,能帮助其达成特定财务目标的门店。它指出,时任首席执行官罗德尼·麦克马伦(Rodney McMullen)设立了一笔 4亿美元 的奖金池,用于在交易完成后根据利润目标奖励高管。

信用评分转变冲击抵押贷款

法院文件显示,克罗格超市(Kroger)表示其剥离方案在经济上是合理的,且具有完成交易的强有力经济激励。该公司还表示,艾伯森超市(Albertsons)制定了一套“B计划”,即在合并未能完成时提起诉讼。

(接 B1 页)

系统,使其更具预测性,并创造一个更安全、更稳健的市场。

这些变化在过去一年中一直在酝酿,但上个月在普尔特(Pulte)指示房利美(Fannie Mae)和房地美(Freddie Mac)批准所有贷款机构使用 VantageScore 4.0 后正式启动。由非银行机构主导的抵押贷款行业迅速响应。美国最大的贷款机构 Rocket Mortgage 表示,其收费基于借款人的信用评分以及贷款规模与融资房屋价值的比例。

政府目前正将 VantageScore 纳入计算。在 9 月初发布的一个版本中,两种评分被视为不同。例如,对照表显示,720 分的 VantageScore 应被视为 700 分的 FICO。

随后在 9 月底,普尔特取消了这一差异。他表示,将采用一套统一的定价表,将 FICO 和 VantageScore 同等对待。他在 X 上写道:“在听取贷款机构和消费者的反馈后,我们正在简化抵押贷款定价。”

这就像挥动了一根魔杖,允许贷款机构选择可用的最高分数。

tember 那时提取了两种评分。他表示,在 Rocket 发放的抵押贷款中,VantageScore 4.0 平均比 FICO Classic 高出 11 到 12 个点。“用最简单的话来说,这意味着绝大多数人在使用 VantageScore 时获得了相同的价格或略好的价格,”他说道。

从房利美和房地美购买债券的抵押贷款债券投资者则担心他们自己的模型,以及“他们是否得到了风险补偿”,投资银行 Brean Capital 的固定收益策略主管 Scott Buchta 表示。

目前,市场并未将两种评分视为等同。

Milliman 的一项分析发现,在试点期间,当贷款使用 VantageScore 而非 FICO 发放时,信用评分范围相似的借款人被收取了更高的利率——最高多出 0.2 个百分点。

这些变化在过去一年中一直在酝酿,但于上月开始加速推进。

它将使用 VantageScore 作为其首选评分模型,而非 FICO。United Wholesale Mortgage 表示,它将提取两种评分并采用较高的一项。PennyMac 则表示,其在各业务部门中均部署了 VantageScore。

“我们希望让我们的经纪人,进而让我们的消费者,能够获得任何可用资源中的最佳方案,”UWM 首席增长官 Desmond P. Smith 表示。

根据咨询公司 Milliman 的分析,在部分贷款机构试点新评分的 8 月,使用 VantageScore 4.0 办理的房地美和房地美抵押贷款金额近 40 亿美元 billion,而 4 月份这一数字仅为 $800 万。

根据行业刊物《Inside Mortgage Finance》的数据,在截至 9 月的六个月中,房地美和房地美通过证券化出售的 4000 亿美元 billion 资金中,约有 3% 与 VantageScore 相关,而此前该比例基本为零。

此次变革的核心是房地美和房地美在 2008 年住房危机期间推出的旨在评估风险的定价网格。这些网格决定了房地美和房地—

FICO 和 VantageScore 信用评分是基于不同的算法和数据计算而出的。通常而言,长期被房地美和房地美采用的 SWI 评分对消费者的要求更高。例如,它要求消费者的信用历史长度(约六个月)要比 VantageScore 版本更长。

“我怀疑 Pulte 是否清楚自己在做什么,”曾在 SWI 和 VantageScore 工作过的 John Alzheimer 表示。“这就像华氏度和摄氏度——在某种程度上,你永远无法得到相同的输出结果。”

根据 的数据, SWI 评分下降 20 分会使违约概率增加 40% 到 50%。

TD Cowen 分析师 Jaret Seiberg 在一份报告中写道:“如果认为之前的网格能够准确衡量风险,那么这意味着房地美和房地美在每笔 VantageScore 贷款中承担了更多风险,且未获得相应的补偿。”

Rocket 首席业务官 Bill Banfield 表示,该公司在 5 月至 9 月期间运行了 140 万 份信用报告—

简单。安全。稳定。

为重视本金保护、可预测结果和坦诚沟通的人士提供年金产品。

ManhattanLife,与您同行。始于 1850 年。

Meta称新AI模型将提升智能体性能

Muse Wonder的推出正值公司个人助手Muse的下载量放缓之际

作者:MEGHAN BOBROWSKY

Meta平台公司周一发布了一款新的人工智能模型,该公司称该模型将其推向了AI前沿,这是该公司去年创建Meta超智能实验室(Meta Superintelligence Labs)时设定的目标。

这款名为Muse Wonder的模型面临的一项重要考验,将是它能在多大程度上提高Muse的留存率并加速其采用。Muse是该公司上个月推出的新型个人助手智能体。

Sensor Tower的数据显示,Muse自发布以来在全球已累积近900万次下载。但下载量已开始放缓,且在14天后的留存率落后于ChatGPT。

“有些人对于想将该产品用于何处,或者它如何改善他们的生活有相当清晰的认识,”Meta的AI主管Alexandr Wang在一次采访中表示。“而其他可能不太熟悉AI或智能体的人可能无法理解这一点,对于他们来说,我认为这更多是一个入门障碍。”

Meta称,该新模型在多项测试中的表现优于OpenAI的Astra和Anthropic的Fable,并将很快为每月$20和每月$100两个档位的订阅用户提供Muse的动力支持。Meta表示,该模型包含更好的记忆力、更好的专注力以帮助用户应对具有挑战性的目标,以及在健康、金融和法律领域拥有更专业的知识。

“我们认为作为一款前沿模型,它与目前市面上最顶尖的模型具有竞争力,”Wang说道。“除此之外,它还是专门针对个人和专业智能体的最佳模型,并将成为驱动Muse这类体验的最佳模型。”

Meta的股价在周一上涨了$3。

在当时最新的模型Llama 4.发布效果令人失望后,Meta在2025年春季对其AI工作进行了全面调整。Meta首席执行官马克·扎克伯格从Scale AI聘请Wang来领导新成立的Meta超智能实验室,旨在为其数十亿用户提供所谓的“个人超智能”。这一目标以Muse的形式出现,扎克伯格上个月表示,Muse是该公司构建内容的“核心”。

OpenAI在近两周前的年度开发者大会上发布了竞争对手AI智能体Dots。谷歌提供一款名为Gemini Spark的智能体,初创公司Instinct也推出了其备受关注的智能体,后者目前已成为Muse的主要竞争对手。

中国乘用车市场信息协会将这一疲软归因于传统燃料汽车需求的萎缩。

中国月度汽车销量下降 28%

作者:JIAHUI HUANG

中国 9 月份的月度汽车销量再次走弱,传统的旺季未能带来乐观局面。

中国乘用车市场信息联席会(CPCA)周一表示,9 月份乘用车零售销量同比下降 28% 至 162 万 辆。与 8 月份相比,销量增长了 5%。

在经历了连续 12 个月的下滑后,该国在传统旺季开始的 9 月份未能报告销量回升。

该协会将这种疲软归因于传统燃料汽车需求的萎缩,因为高油价和中国整体疲软的消费情绪抑制了消费者的信心。

CPCA 补充称,内存芯片成本的上升也减缓了中国新车的发布速度,从而影响了整体销量。

在经历了多年的快速扩张和去年同期强劲的销售后,中国汽车市场一直处于低迷期,并出现了一些整合的早期迹象。

上个月,广汽集团表示将从一汽集团收购一汽丰田 50% 的股权。吉利和蔚来也达成了电池交换与充电合作伙伴关系。

新能源汽车(包括纯电动汽车和插电式混合动力汽车)的销量以及出口已成为中国汽车市场的主要主题。

该机构表示,新能源汽车在 9 月份的总汽车销量中占比达到创纪录的 67%。然而,9 月份新能源汽车的零售销量下降了 17% 至 108 万 辆。

为了抵消中国市场需求的放缓,许多中国汽车制造商转向海外市场寻求增长。

9 月份,中国新能源汽车的出口再次翻倍。CPCA 数据显示,上个月乘用车出口增长 74% 至 917,000 辆。

9 月份,特斯拉从其上海工厂出口了 30,529 辆汽车,并销售了 95,366 辆。

CPCA 预计 10 月份中国汽车销量不会出现强劲反弹。中国居民的整体消费情绪依然疲软,在汽车制造商之间爆发价格战的背景下,他们倾向于持观望态度而非做出购买决定。人口结构的变化和高油价也可能损害销量。

该机构表示,由于欧盟的贸易压力,出口预计也将放缓。

大众汽车交付量因中国市场持续疲软而下降

作者:DOMINIC CHOPPING 以及增程车型,该公司表示。

由于这家德国汽车制造商继续受到中国市场恶化的影响,大众汽车集团(Volkswagen Group)第三季度的车辆交付量有所下降。

这家旗下拥有大众(VW)、奥迪(Audi)和保时捷(Porsche)等品牌阵营的公司周一表示,集团车辆交付量同比下降 14% 至 189 万。

“大众汽车集团无法逃避中国整体市场的显著下滑,”该公司表示,“尤其是在内燃机汽车业务方面。”

尽管该公司第二代插电式混合动力车型需求增加,但该季度在中国市场的交付量仍下降 39% 至 405,800 辆。

\*不含中国

该公司除中东欧地区外,所有地区的交付量均出现下降,其中西欧交付量下降 2.8%,北美交付量下降 5.8%。

在全球范围内,该集团纯电动汽车的交付量同比下降 4.7% 至 240,200 辆,欧洲是唯一显示增长的地区。

“在我们的本土市场,我们看到向纯电动汽车转型的趋势显著加速,”集团销售扩展执行委员会成员马丁·桑德(Martin Sander)表示。“主要原因是目前高昂的燃料价格以及更广泛的入门级车型选择。”

Source: the company

[...OMITTED...]

巴黎车展如今由中国汽车主导

周一,比亚迪执行副总裁Stella Li与Stellantis副总裁John Elkann在巴黎车展现场。

作者:STEPHEN WILMOT 和 RYAN FELTON

巴黎——总部位于北京的豪华汽车制造商理想汽车(Li Auto)利用这座城市的车展,展示了一款配备前排按摩座椅、后排乘客21英寸屏幕以及一个能让能量饮料保持冰凉或让咖啡保持温热的中控台单元的汽车。

与此同时,全球最畅销的电动汽车品牌比亚迪(BYD)揭晓了一款面向欧洲市场的SUV,该车可在五分钟内为电池充入大部分电量。

小鹏汽车(XPeng)也不甘示弱,宣传了其在香榭丽舍大街上围绕拿破仑·波拿巴下令建造的19世纪纪念碑——凯旋门进行的自动驾驶技术测试。首席执行官何小鹏在周日的一场活动上表示,这款配备了由驾驶员监督技术的SUV能够胜任该任务。

欢迎来到巴黎车展——不过,今年的情况可能会让人误以为这是一场中国车展。总共有约20个中国汽车品牌设立了展位,占到现场所有品牌的三分之一。这一数量仅次于欧洲品牌,且高于两年前上一次车展时的9个。

美国品牌共有三个参展:特斯拉(Tesla)、福特汽车(Ford Motor)和Lucid。

中国汽车制造商使得这场欧洲最大的车展比其美国同行更具话题性。与近期在底特律和洛杉矶举行的活动不同,巴黎车展始终有大批观众拥挤在舞台周围,见证新车的首次亮相。汽车制造商们接连举行新闻发布会,有时甚至时间重叠,而中国高管们则在强调他们增加在欧生产的计划。

“他们不仅希望在这里销售,还希望被视为良好的企业公民,”总部位于美国的汽车顾问Adam Bernard表示。

中国汽车制造商通过提供配备高端功能且价格具有竞争力的车辆,正在加速其在全欧洲的销售。截至8月的年度销售额中,中国品牌占所有销量的11.3%,高于去年同期的7.1%。

这种转变是导致欧洲汽车制造商出现一波裁员潮的原因之一,这令政治领导人感到担忧,并加速了布鲁塞尔与北京之间的谈判。

周五,欧盟与中国达成一项协议,欧盟表示该协议可能会将其进口的中国混合动力汽车数量减半。欧盟官员周一表示,欧盟将在第一年实施35万辆的年度配额,并补充称,在接下来的三年中,该数量每年可增加6%。

法国总统埃马纽埃尔·马克龙(Emmanuel Macron)亲自试图为车展注入一份欧洲风情。马克龙赞赏雪铁龙(Citroen)2CV车型的纯电动原型车,该车型是这家法国公司的经典之作,也是战后时代欧洲街道上的常客。与其他历史悠久的欧洲汽车制造商一样,拥有雪铁龙的Stellantis公司正依托其20世纪的传承,以应对来自中国的21世纪初创企业的浪潮。

到目前为止,由五家公司拥有的品牌占据了中国对欧出口的大部分份额:比亚迪(BYD)、奇瑞(Chery)、上汽(SAIC)、吉利(Geely)以及

通过与Jeep所有者Stellantis成立合资企业而扩张的零跑汽车(Leapmotor)。

国有的长安汽车(Changan)作为中国第四大汽车制造商,正紧随其后。其目标是到2030年在中国境外销售150万辆汽车,是去年总数的两倍多。该公司表示,希望明年在欧洲销售10万辆汽车,高于2026年3万辆的目标。

“我们的目标很高,”长安汽车全球执行顾问Klaus Zyciora表示。

中国汽车制造商还试图在欧洲人严密守护的豪华车市场中挤掉欧洲品牌。赛力斯集团(Seres Group)旗下的问界(Aito)品牌宣布,将于2027年秋季在欧洲上市。

“中国公司以成本效率著称。要让客户相信我们也能做奢侈品需要时间,但我们会实现的,”赛力斯(Seres)董事会成员克利福德·康(Clifford Kang)表示。

由于高关税和软件限制,中国汽车基本上被排除在美国市场之外,但特朗普总统上个月再次表示,如果中国汽车在当地制造,他将表示欢迎,这令底特律感到不安。国会目前正在讨论一项立法禁令,旨在禁止中国汽车进入。

美国顶级汽车工业团体——汽车创新联盟(Alliance for Automotive Innovation)主席约翰·博泽拉(John Bozzella)表示:“欧洲对美国来说是一个前车之鉴。美国政策制定者试图做的是在事前解决这个问题。”

中国汽车之所以能在欧洲站稳脚跟,部分原因是利用了布鲁塞尔无意间创造的一个漏洞。2024年,官员们将插电式混合动力车排除在欧盟对中国电动汽车征收的额外关税之外。中国品牌随即转向销售这些车型,并从此在这一车型领域夺取了不成比例的市场份额,而这类车型已成为那些既追求燃油经济性又不愿妥协的消费者的理想选择。

欧洲各国担心北京采取报复措施,因此在完全将中国排除在市场之外的问题上犹豫不决。欧洲大陆对出口的依赖程度远高于美国。

英国商业大臣乔纳森·雷诺兹(Jonathan Reynolds)在最近的一次采访中表示:“我必须确保保护我的出口市场。”

与欧盟一样,英国也被中国汽车淹没,其中奇瑞(Chery)旗下 Jaecoo 品牌的一款车型在 9 月成为了最畅销的车型。

中国公司正开始实现生产本土化,以规避关税并缓和关系。“在欧洲,为欧洲”是许多中国车企在展会上宣传的口号。

周日晚上,在塞纳河上一座漂浮艺术博物馆内举行的一场盛宴上,行业高管们在现场爵士乐队的伴奏下举杯交谈,而当地居民则在河边跑步经过。吉利汽车副总裁南(Alex Nan)告诉听众:“对于吉利来说,全球化不是一场单人冲刺,而是一场我们与合作伙伴并肩奔跑的马拉松。”

欧盟旨在遏制中国混合动力车

一名欧盟高级官员在双方本月初贸易谈判取得进展后表示,欧盟旨在通过将中国汽车的进口量限制在每年 350,000 辆,以遏制大量中国混合动力车运往该贸易集团。

该官员周一表示,根据计划,欧盟将在未来四年内寻求限制中国混合动力及插电式混合动力车辆的进口,目标是将中国预计运往该集团的车辆数量减少一半以上。他补充说,这项保障措施可能会在 12 月初生效。

该上限还将包括 6% 的固定年度增长限制。

根据欧盟统计局(Eurostat)的数据,这个由 27 个成员国组成的贸易集团在 2024 年从中国进口了约 107,000 辆混合动力车,2025年约为 302,000 辆。该欧盟官员表示,这一数字在 2026 年可能会达到 800,000 辆。

由于担心中国廉价进口产品激增,欧洲官员正寻求重新平衡这个 27 个成员国集团与中国的关系。

——Edith Hancock

Bumble 洽谈私有化,进展顺利

创始人沃尔夫·赫德

预计在交易后

仍将参与

公司管理

作者:CARA LOMBARDO

据知情人士透露,由惠特尼·沃尔夫·赫德(Whitney Wolfe Herd)创立的约会软件公司 Bumble 正处于深入洽谈中,计划通过一项估值约为 10 亿美元 billion 的交易实现私有化。

知情人士表示,买家是 Ithaca Holdings,这是一家由两名硅谷高管近期创立的公司。 SWI 将成为 Ithaca 的首批重大举措之一,该公司计划将其投资应用于包括人工智能在内的先进技术。

截至周五收盘, SWI 的市值约为 3.35亿美元。自 2021 年上市以来,其股价已下跌超过 90%。

沃尔夫·赫德在共同创立 Match Group 旗下的 Tinder 后,于 2014 年创立了 。知情人士称,作为交易的一部分,她预计将将其在约会软件中持有的至少部分股份进行滚动投资,并继续参与公司管理。

私募股权公司黑石(Blackstone)是 SWI 的早期支持者之一,并于 2019. 购买了多数股权。根据 FactSet 的数据,黑石在 IPO 后出售了大部分股份,但目前仍持有约 140 亿美元% 的股份。

假设谈判不破裂,交易最早可能在本周达成。

当沃尔夫·赫德创立 时,她试图通过创建一个由女性发起对话的平台,来颠覆传统的约会模式。这一想法引起了轰动,该公司在 IPO 后的市值峰值曾超过 140 亿美元 billion。

但由于年轻用户日益反感在线约会平台, SWI 以及包括 Match Group 在内的其他约会软件公司一直陷入困境。沃尔夫·赫德于 2025, 回归担任 的首席执行官,几个月后,该公司裁员约 $30% 的员工。

在 Match Group 方面,约会软件 Hinge 收入的增长在第二季度部分抵消了其最大应用 Tinder 几乎持平的收入。

与此同时,在 SWI 方面, SWI 和 Badoo(该公司的另一款应用)均报告收入下降。两家公司一直在将其业务与 AI 进行更深层的整合。今年 8 月, SWI 表示将取消其“女性优先”的消息功能。

Ithaca 在其网站上称其使命是“利用前沿技术构建产品,以显著改善人们的生活”,该公司由拉维·古普塔(Ravi Gupta)和约翰·赫格曼(John Hegeman)创立。

古普塔是风险投资公司红杉资本(Sequoia Capital)的合伙人,曾任 Instacart 的首席财务官。赫格曼是 Meta 的前高管,最近担任首席营收官。

PATRICK T. FALLON / 惠特尼·沃尔夫·赫德

7-Eleven北美负责人借鉴日本经验

新任负责人认为,在日本受欢迎的理念也能在美加消费者中获得成功。

作者:MEGUMI FUJIKAWA

AKIO KON / 彭博新闻社

7-Eleven Inc. 的新任负责人计划通过镜像复制在日本取得成功的经验,来重塑这家知名便利店连锁店在北美的形象。

通过借鉴 7-Eleven 在日本的模式,Mauricio Leyva 押注他能够重新推动该品牌在美国的增长。

他在周五的一次采访中表示:“我想说,这是我们‘自豪地借鉴’的东西。”

Leyva 于 8 月就任这家便利店巨头北美分公司的首席执行官,他认为在日本受欢迎的理念在美加消费者中同样能获得成功。

他说:“我个人体验到日本最吸引我们的东西之一就是对细节的关注和对质量的重视——这是我们在北美需要加强并做得更好的地方。”

7-Eleven 门店的日本运营商 Seven & i Holdings 已委派这位零售业资深人士执行一项雄心勃勃的改革计划,包括门店现代化、在整个北美扩大自有品牌规模,以及扩大 7NOW 配送平台的规模。

回顾他在消费行业数十年的经验(最近担任 Keurig Dr Pepper 的集团总裁),Leyva 表示,他专注于比竞争对手更深入地了解客户,并提供能让消费者为了日常需求而不断回到 7-Eleven 的体验。

他引用日本策略中的一个例子是打造成为标志性的门店主打产品,例如 7-Eleven 日本的鸡蛋沙拉三明治。Leyva 还强调了丰富的食品种类和易于开启的产品包装。

他表示,尽管通货膨胀影响消费者可支配收入等不利因素依然存在,但他有信心该零售集团的“北极星”转型战略能够取得成功。

在上周四公布的第二季度财报中,Seven & i 报告其海外便利店部门盈利强劲,因为汽油价格上涨提升了其在北美的业绩。

尽管如此,Leyva 预计随着生活成本上升,美国消费者的行为将发生转变。

他说:“在门店层面发生的交易频率实际上在维持,但每单金额和购物篮价值不一定在增加。价值和质量将继续像现在一样重要,甚至重要程度会进一步加速。”

在周五的采访中,Seven & i 还更新了将其子公司 7-Eleven Inc. 上市的计划,此举旨在释放股东价值并精简其业务结构。

该公司最初在去年 3 月宣布首次公开募股(IPO),但随后因市场环境不利而推迟了时间表。目前预计最早在 2027 财年上市。

Seven & i 的首席执行官 Stephen Dacus 表示:“目标不是为了做 IPO,目标是增加股东价值。”

Dacus 指出,由于人工智能(AI)热潮,零售业公开上市的环境依然充满挑战。

他说:“AI 抽走了该领域的大量氧气。所有的资金都流向了那里。”

Dacus 补充说,管理层还必须在转型计划下实现持续的业绩提升,以便在进入资本市场前给投资者充分的信心。

此次计划的 IPO 也是一项防御措施,旨在应对 Circle K 所有者 Alimentation Couche-Tard 长期以来发起的 470 亿美元 billion 收购攻势。

这家加拿大零售巨头最终因估值差距和美国反垄断问题产生的分歧而撤回了报价,这促使 Seven & i 将重心转向重组和独立的北美 IPO 战略。

上市可能为 Seven & i 获得更高估值铺平道路,从而缩小使其成为外国收购目标的股价差距。

支持项:

3 项品牌指标

欲了解获奖活动的更多详情,请访问 www.world-media-group.com / awards

食品制造商 Beyond 寻求品牌重塑

股价

作者:PATRICK COFFEE

据创始人兼首席执行官伊森·布朗(Ethan Brown)称,Beyond Meat 在其历史的大部分时间里一直与肉类工业进行着一场“真正史诗级的营销之战”。如今,这家陷入困境的食品制造商希望通过营销来实现扭转局面。

该公司在 2025 年将其包装上的品牌名称中的“meat”(肉)一词去掉;上个月推出了其核心肉类替代品之外的产品和品牌;目前正与营销机构洽谈将于明年首次亮相的新宣传活动和品牌定位。

该公司还开始在新闻稿和收益报告等官方沟通文件中加入一个新的公司名称: the Plant Protein Company。

布朗承认, SWI 的品牌仍处于恢复模式。他将这种情况部分归因于与肉类生产商相关的团体多年来一直试图将植物基替代品贴上“高度加工”和“不健康”的标签,部分归因于做空者和预测市场交易员押注该公司衰落。2020 年的一则地区性超级碗广告描绘了一个孩子在拼写比赛中,在面对一种据称用于合成肉的陌生成分名称时感到吃力,随后告诉观众:“如果你不能拼写它或读出它,也许你不应该食用它。”

“ 一直被贬低,”布朗在一次讨论公司新战略的采访中表示,“围绕它的混乱太多了。”该公司的挑战不仅限于品牌认知。自 2019 年以近 15 亿美元 billion 的估值上市以来,该公司每年都报告经营亏损,股价自那时起下跌了 $98% 以上。

来源:S&P Capital IQ(结果);FactSet(股价)

该公司近期削减了包括营销在内的各项支出。虽然季度营收持续下降,但其同比销售额的跌幅已从 2025 年最后一季度的 20% 改善至今年第二季度的 8%。

研究公司 Gartner 的高级首席分析师艾米莉·魏斯(Emily Weiss)表示,该公司还面临着一个自 2012 年产品首次上架以来已经发生变化的市场,因为消费者对可持续性的兴趣已让位于对减肥和蛋白质摄入等问题的关注。

但魏斯表示,围绕植物基食品的炒作与抵制循环在近年来几乎完全消失,这可能给 一个机会,使其能够利用美国人对蛋白质一切事物的痴迷,并在更谨慎选择食物的 GLP-1 药物使用者中寻找新消费者。

希望情况确实如此。该公司的新产品组合包括 Starmatter 蛋白粉、 Starcut 牛肉干风格能量棒,以及最近结束测试的 Immerse 系列高蛋白碳酸饮料。

“ 将成为任何植物基、主食蛋白质产品的锚点,但随后我们将创建这些其他品牌……而且它们都有自己的故事线,”布朗说道。

Patrick Coffee 为 WSJ 领导力学院的《CMO Today》撰稿。

Getty Images 将在破产中重组

作者:KATHERINE HAMILTON

Getty Images 正在申请破产,并将通过一项与科赫(Koch)家族公司达成的重组协议私有化。

Koch Equity Development 以及 SWI 家族成员承诺向 SWI 投资 5.33亿美元 股权,以促成该公司私有化并申请第 11 章破产保护。

此外,代表 83.5% 无担保债券的债券持有人已同意通过偿还 2.7亿美元 的未偿无担保票据来减少未偿债务。

代表 约 89% 有担保债券和定期贷款的持有者,以及 100% 的循环信贷额度贷款机构,已同意降低 有担保债务的利息义务并延长债务到期日。

这些协议是一项重组交易的一部分,旨在改善 的资产负债表并允许该公司私有化。Koch Equity Development 和参与投资的 SWI 家族成员将持有重组后 100% 的股份。

在 Koch 提供最高 13 亿美元 million 融资的支持下, SWI 在重组期间将继续正常运营。

网络安全公司 Elisity 被 IonQ 收购

作者:LAUREN THOMAS

量子计算公司 IonQ 达成了一项全股票交易,收购私有公司 Elisity。高管们告诉《华尔街日报》,此次交易对这家网络安全公司的估值最高达 13 亿美元 billion。

IonQ 董事长兼首席执行官 Niccolo de Masi 表示,这是一次押注,即随着量子计算和 AI 系统变得更加强大和先进,网络安全对企业而言将变得更加至关重要。

他在一次采访中表示:“坏人们将继续利用新技术。不幸的是,在网络安全风险方面,我们正在进入最危险的几年。”

13 亿美元 billion 的交易价格包括最高 1.5亿美元 的或有支付款项,具体取决于 Elisity 的未来业绩。

IonQ 在纳斯达克的股票周一收盘下跌 9%,其市值接近 160 亿美元 billion。该股自 2021 年通过特殊目的收购公司(SPAC)上市以来一直处于上涨势头。

IonQ 的量子硬件和软件旨在解决从药物研发到国防等一系列行业中传统计算机难以处理的问题。它专注于所谓的“离子阱”量子计算机,这类计算机已被证明具有更高的准确性。

高管们表示,此次交易预计发行的 IonQ 股票数量将按每股 $33.07 至 $49.61 之间的价格计算。

政府及其在美国对量子计算技术支持的行政管理。

---

$1.3B 该交易将使网络安全公司Elisity的估值最高达到这一数额。

该业务得益于特朗普总统日益增长的热情。

在夏季,总统签署了行政命令,推动构建强大的量子计算机,并保护政府免受相关网络威胁。

Elisity成立于2019, 提供一个旨在防止网络攻击者或勒索软件在组织内部传播的平台。其部分大客户包括医疗保健公司和医院。

预计在与IonQ公司的交易完成后,Elisity首席执行官詹姆斯·温布伦纳(James Winebrenner)将留任。

德马西(De Masi)表示,两家公司将共同致力于帮助客户应对各种日益增长的网络安全风险,包括涉及所谓AI智能体的威胁。

近几个月发生的一系列恶意AI黑客攻击令业界和政府官员感到不安。在其中一个案例中,一群OpenAI智能体在数月内访问了美国政府网站。

Anthropic公司的Mythos模型也引起了华尔街的警觉。

德马西表示,美国企业和美国政府必须在“Q-Day”到来前做好准备——这是一个即将到来的时间点,届时量子计算机将足够强大,能够破解目前广泛使用的公钥加密技术。

与国防部密切合作的IonQ公司一直处于收购热潮中,旨在成为其客户的一站式服务商。今年早些时候,该公司达成了迄今为止最大的一笔交易,以18 亿美元 billion收购芯片制造商SkyWater Technology。

ADEK BERRY / 作为主力的时尚部门(旗下拥有路易威登和迪奥,其门店可见于北京)销售额下降了5%。

LVMH销售额削弱奢侈品前景

---

总部位于巴黎的该集团有机增长率较去年同期仅为 1%

作者:JOSHUA KIRBY

法国奢侈品巨头 LVMH 表示,销售增长有所放缓,这给欧洲陷入困境的奢侈品行业期待已久的复苏踩了刹车。

这家总部位于巴黎的集团旗下拥有众多时尚、珠宝和香槟品牌,是整个行业的风向标。该集团周一表示,7月至9月期间的销售额为 185 亿美元 欧元,即 207.2 亿美元 billion。这意味着其有机增长率较去年同期仅为 1%,低于该公司第二季度录得的 3% 的增幅。

根据 Visible Alpha 在财报发布前对分析师的调查,这一结果符合预期。尽管如此,该集团的主力时尚部门(旗下拥有路易威登 Louis Vuitton 和迪奥 Dior 等重量级品牌)的销售额同比下降 5% 至 €82.45 亿美元,低于分析师的预测。

date.

该部门在第二季度曾恢复增长,但此次迅速重回负增长,表明 LVMH 及其同行必须努力才能确保实现持续复苏。LVMH 表示,中国需求的放缓拖累了时尚业务的表现,并指出这一关键市场的环境“不那么活跃”。

首席财务官塞西尔·卡巴尼斯(Cécile Cabanis)在周一的电话会议中表示:“第三季度中国消费者的背景更具挑战性。”她指出,夏季期间的负面新闻流影响了中国购物者的情绪。

伯恩斯坦(Bernstein)经纪公司的分析师在销售额更新后写道,LVMH 现在可能需要展示如何调整定价,使其核心产品对更广泛的公众而言更具可负担性。

LVMH 销售增长的减速给整个行业蒙上了阴影,而该行业此前一直希望摆脱困境。美银(Bank of America)的分析师最近写道,在品牌能够证明其营收有更强劲的加速增长之前,投资者可能会继续对奢侈品股票保持谨慎。

“奢侈品需求在第三季度有所恶化,”美银警告称。

近年来,随着投资者担忧销售额停滞不前,该行业的股价大幅下跌。今年,欧洲奢侈品公司的股价平均下跌超过 20%,其中 LVMH 是表现最差的公司之一。分析师认为,短期内需求几乎没有刺激空间。中国需求长达数年的繁荣已经消退,而对于路易威登等品牌至关重要的西方中产阶级,正日益受到价格上涨的挤压,削弱了他们挥霍高端商品的信心。美国与以色列以及伊朗之间持续不断的战争进一步加剧了这些宏观经济压力。

贝伦贝格(Berenberg)分析师在最近的一份报告中写道:“现实情况是,大多数奢侈品消费者的可支配收入正面临压力。”分析师表示,这使得品牌难以产生可靠的销售增长。

贝伦贝格表示:“需求的脆弱性使该行业容易受到冲击。奢侈品超级周期已经结束。”

欧洲奢侈品行业的其他公司将于本月和下月公布最新的销售数据,包括古驰(Gucci)母公司开云集团(Kering)、顶级手袋制造商爱马仕(Hermès)以及下周公布数据的意大利时尚品牌普拉达(Prada)。LVMH 的销售结果中出现了一些积极迹象:旗下拥有蒂芙尼(Tiffany)、宝格丽(Bulgari)以及众多高端腕表品牌的腕表与珠宝部门,销售额同比增长 6%。选择性零售业务增长了 8%,这主要得益于美容零售商丝芙兰(Sephora)的强劲增长。

董事会理事会峰会

11月9-10日 / 棕榈滩

精选参会人员:

迈克尔·米巴赫 (Michael Miebach)

万事达卡 (Mastercard) 首席执行官

布莱恩·康奈尔 (Brian Cornell)

塔吉特 (Target) 董事会主席

乔·吉门尼斯 (Joe Jimenez)

宝洁 (P&G) 首席独立董事;

通用汽车 (General Motors) 董事;

前诺华 (Novartis) 首席执行官

艾伦·库尔曼 (Ellen Kullman)

安进 (Amgen)、Carbon、高盛 (Goldman Sachs) 董事;

前杜邦 (DuPont) 主席兼首席执行官

创始赞助商:

斯特凡妮·林纳茨 (Stephanie Linnartz)

家得宝 (Home Depot) 董事会成员;前万豪国际 (Marriott International) 总裁;前安德玛 (Under Armour) 总裁兼首席执行官

帕特·鲁索 (Pat Russo)

慧业净业 (Hewlett Packard Enterprise) 主席;

通用汽车 (General Motors) 首席独立董事;

默克 (Merck)、KKR 董事

京·乌尔里希 (Jing Ulrich)

阿迪达斯 (adidas)、施华洛世奇 (Swarovski)、薇拉公司 (Wella Company) 董事会成员;劳斯莱斯汽车 (Rolls-Royce Motor Cars) 奢侈品顾问兼品牌大使;前摩根大通 (JPMorgan) 副主席

马克·温伯格 (Mark Weinberger)

强生 (Johnson & Johnson)、摩根大通 (JPMorgan Chase)、大都会人寿 (MetLife)、沙特阿美 (Saudi Aramco) 董事;前安永 (EY) 全球主席兼首席执行官

海德理克与斯特鲁格尔斯 (HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES)

贡献赞助商:

华尔街日报 — 董事会理事会 (WSJ — BOD Council)

概览:

华尔街日报董事会理事会将于11月9日至10日在佛罗里达州棕榈滩召开,届时各董事会将共同面对我们这个时代最具决定性的领导力挑战。

人工智能正以前所未有的速度重塑各行各业,在为创新和增长创造非凡机遇的同时,也带来了新的风险、伦理问题和治理挑战。董事们处于这一切的中心,帮助组织建立韧性并增强适应能力,同时保持深厚的人文关怀。通过由专家主导的讨论和同行交流,并依托道琼斯 (Dow Jones) 和《华尔街日报》 (The Wall Street Journal) 的全球专业知识,本次峰会将为董事们提供实用见解和前瞻性战略,以引导其组织度过这个全新的领导力时代。

峰会主题:

zscaler

\- 人类优势

\- AI 时代的领导力

\- 构建具有韧性和适应力的组织

申请邀请:

发送电子邮件至 BoDCouncil@wsj.com 或扫描二维码。

---

如何阅读股票表格

以下说明适用于在纽约证券交易所(NYSE)、纽约证券交易所 Arca(NYSE Arca)、纽约证券交易所 American(NYSE American)、纳斯达克股票市场(Nasdaq Stock Market)、Cboe BZX 和德克萨斯股票交易所上市的证券。价格综合自各市场中心报告的交易,包括证券交易所、金融业监管局(Finra)、电子通信网络和其他经纪交易商。该列表包含按市值计算的 1,000 家最大公司。

下划线报价表示该股票的成交量与该发行人的平均交易量相比有较大变化。

粗体报价突出显示那些前一交易日收盘价在 \$2 或更高,且价格变动幅度在 5% 或以上的发行人。

1-创 52 周新高;1-创 52 周新低;dd-表示最近 4 个季度出现亏损。

股票表格反映的是截至东部时间下午 4 点的综合常规交易情况,以及与前一日东部时间下午 4 点官方收盘价相比的变化。

低点

2026年10月12日,星期一

股票 | 代码< / > 收盘价< / > 净变动< / > | A< / > B< / > C< / > < / >< / > AES< / > AES< / > 14.98< / > 0.04< / >< / > Aflac< / > AFL< / > 115.89< / > 1.35< / >< / > AGNC Invt< / > AGNC< / > 8.68< / > 0.01< / >< / > APA< / > APA< / > 46.84< / > 0.96< / >< / > ASE Tech< / > ASX< / > 47.53< / > 1.10< / >< / > ASML< / > ASML< / > 1750.24< / > -30.10< / >< / > AST Space< / > ASTS< / > 51.46< / > 0.49< / >< / > AT&T< / > T< / > 22.49< / > 0.31< / >< / > ATI< / > ATI< / > 187.98< / > -3.86< / >< / > Abbott Labs< / > ABT< / > 101.82< / > 2.22< / >< / > AbbVie< / > ABBV< / > 281.12< / > 4.65< / >< / > Accenture< / > ACN< / > 214.87< / > 5.81< / >< / > Acuity< / > AYI< / > 296.27< / > -2.07< / >< / > Adobe< / > ADBE< / > 238.14< / > -4.13< / >< / > AdvDrainageSys< / > WMS< / > 125.93< / > 0.14< / >< / > AdvEnergyInds< / > AEIS< / > 280.77< / > -7.89< / >< / > AdvMicroDevices< / > AMD< / > 594.24< / > -13.86< / >< / > Aegon< / > AEG< / > 8.30< / > 0.06< / >< / > AerCap< / > AER< / > 146.20< / > 1.48< / >< / > AffiliatedMgrs< / > AMG< / > 381.83< / > -5.43< / >< / > AffirmA< / > AFRM< / > 78.63< / > -2.07< / >< / > AgilentTechs< / > < / > -0.87< / >< / > AmerExpress< / > AXP< / > 311.53< / > 3.36< / >< / > AmericanFin< / > AFG< / > 143.78< / > 2.70< / > |

Atlassian< / > TEAM< / > 207.75< / > 0.96< / >< / > AtmosEnergy< / > ATO< / > 162.38< / > 0.72< / >< / > AuroralInnov< / > AUR< / > 5.66< / > -0.17< / >< / > Autodesk< / > ADSK< / > 233.54< / > -1.81< / >< / > ADP< / > ADP< / > 273.81< / > 2.93< / >< / > AutoZone< / > AZO< / > 2898.85< / > -41.00< / >< / > Avantor< / > AVTR< / > 15.49< / > -0.18< / >< / > AveryDennison< / > AVY< / > 167.65< / > -0.17< / >< / > AxonEnterprise< / > AXON< / > 414.43< / > -8.46< / >< / > BCE< / > BCE< / > 18.86< / > 0.08< / >< / > BHP Group< / > BHP< / > 86.72< / > -0.02< / >< / > BJ'sWholesale< / > BJ< / > 99.80< / > 1.22< / >< / > BP< / > BP< / > 46.73< / > 0.48< / >< / > BWX Tech< / > BWXT< / > 139.92< / > -3.91< / > |

[...OMITTED...]

股票 | 代码< / > 收盘价< / > 净涨跌< / > | Bullish< / > BLSH< / > 31.63< / > -0.96< / >< / > BungeGlobal< / > BG< / > 104.22< / > 1.49< / >< / > BurlingtonStrs< / > BURL< / > 268.16< / > -8.81< / >< / > CACI Intl< / > CACI< / > 1614.36< / > 3.71< / >< / > CBRE Group< / > CBRE< / > 130.71< / > -0.09< / >< / > CDW< / > CDW< / > 143.76< / > 1.59< / >< / > CF Industries CF< / > CF< / > 114.58< / > 3.04< / >< / > CGI A< / > GIB< / > 70.71< / > 0.62< / >< / > CH Robinson< / > CHRW< / > 139.75< / > -2.56< / >< / > CME Group< / > CME< / > 277.24< / > -3.32< / >< / > CMS Energy CMS< / > CMS< / > 65.86< / > 0.37< / >< / > CNA< / > Coca-ColaCon< / > COKE< / > 197.22< / > 0.98< / >< / > Coca-ColaEuropa< / > CEP< / > 105.08< / > 0.83< / >< / > CoeurMining< / > CDE< / > 16.76< / > -0.37< / >< / > Cognex< / > CGNX< / > 61.12< / > -1.10< / >< / > CognizantTech< / > CTSH< / > 59.68< / > 0.48< / >< / > Coherent< / > COHR< / > 288.02< / > -24.60< / >< / > CoinbaseGilbl< / > COIN< / > 180.39< / > 1.00< / >< / > ColgatePalm< / > CL< / > 89.98< / > 1.71< / >< / > Comcast A< / > OMCA< / > 20.68< / > 0.02< / >< / > ComfortSystems< / > FIX< / > 1638.05< / > -77.64< / >< / > SABESP< / > SBS< / > 6.73< / > -0.01< / > |

股票< / > 代码< / > 收盘价< / > 净涨跌< / >< / > BXP< / > BXP< / > 59.55< / > 0.50< / >< / > Baidu< / > BIDU< / > 84.30< / > -1.03< / >< / > BakerHughes< / > BKR< / > 56.18< / > -0.52< / >< / > Ball< / > BALL< / > 59.19< / > 0.73< / >< / > BBVA< / > BBVA< / > 26.19< / > 0.07< / >< / > BancoBradesco< / > BDO< / > 3.94< / > 0.02< / >< / > BancodeChile< / > BCH< / > 38.94< / > 0.05< / >< / > BancSanBrasil< / > BSR< / > 5.77< / > -0.04< / >< / > BcoSantChile< / > BSAC< / > 32.19< / > -0.03< / >< / > BancoSantander< / > SAN< / > 13.48< / > -0.01< / >< / > BankofAmerica< / > BAC< / > 54.58< / > 0.26< / >< / > BankMontreal< / > BMO< / > 163.88< / > 1.29< / >< / > BankNY Mellon< / > BNY< / > 142.85< / > 0.14< / >< / > BankNova Scotia< / > BNS< / > 88.80< / > 0.35< / >< / > Barclays< / > BCS< / > 23.06< / > -0.03< / >< / > BarrickMining< / > B< / > 40.83< / > -0.23< / >< / > BaxterIntl< / > BAX< / > 24.78< / > 0.43< / >< / > BectonDickens< / > BDX< / > 188.89< / > 5.14< / >< / > BendingSpoons< / > BSP< / > 37.04< / > -0.97< / >< / > BentleySystems< / > BSY< / > 35.15< / > 0.18< / >< / > BeOneMed< / > ONC< / > 350.40< / > -4.07< / >< / > Berkley< / > WRB< / > 72.90< / > 0.99< / >< / > BerkHathwy B< / > BRKB< / > 517.60< / > 1.98< / >< / > BerkHathwy< / > 189.50< / > -0.87< / >< / > Booking< / > BKNG< / > 158.43< / > -1.91< / >< / > BorgWarner< / > BWA< / > 60.03< / > -1.27< / >< / > BostonSci< / > BSX< / > 43.84< / > 1.11< / >< / > BridgeBioPharma< / > BBIO< / > 65.75< / > 0.40< / >< / > BrightSpring< / > BTSG< / > 63.01< / > -0.73< / >< / > BristolMyers< / > BMY< / > 57.58< / > -1.54< / >< / > BritishAmTob< / > BTI< / > 55.62< / > 0.12< / >< / > Broadcom< / > AVG< / > 354.73< / > -6.81< / >< / > BroadridgeFinl< / > BR< / > 166.41< / > 0.96< / >< / > Brookfield

Asset | BAM< / > 45.83< / > -0.05< / > | Brookfield< / > BN< / > 37.05< / > -0.04< / >< / > BrookfieldInf< / > BIP< / > 36.72< / > -0.38< / >< / > BrookWealth< / > BNT< / > 37.05< / > -0.01< / >< / > Brown&Brown< / > BRO< / > 63.65< / > 0.77< / >< / > BrownForman B< / > BF.B< / > 26.81< / > 0.42< / >< / > BrownForman A< / > BF.A< / > 27.28< / > 0.37< / >< / > Bruker< / > BRKR< / > 56.25< / > -2.59< / > |

DEF

广告

市场广场

广告投放请致电:800-366-3975 或访问 WSJ.com / classifieds

船舶

---

商业地产

---

房地产出售通知 – 曼哈顿 美国纽约南区联邦地区法院

富国银行(WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION)作为受托人,旨在为 CD 2018-CD7 抵押信托商业抵押贷款穿透证书 2018-CD7 系列的持有者提供利益,其通过 2018 年 8 月 1 日签署的汇总与服务协议项下的特别服务商 Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC 行事。原告起诉 PRINCE 26, LLC;29 PRINCE STREET ASSOCIATES LLC 等被告。根据本案于 2026 年 8 月 5 日签署的特定命令与判决(“判决”),我,下述裁判员,将于 2026 年 10 月 21 日下午 3:00(东部时间)在纽约州纽约市纽约县 Prince 街 26 号(邮编 10012)的前台阶处,通过公开拍卖出售以下房产(作为单一批次出售),该术语定义如下,具体描述及边界如下:地块 A:位于纽约州纽约市纽约县曼哈顿区的所有特定地块、碎片或土地,其边界及描述如下:起点位于 Prince 街北侧的一点,距离 Prince 街北侧与 Mott 街东侧交汇点向东 27 英尺 11 1/4 英寸(契据),27.94 英尺(实际);由此向北,与 Mott 街东侧平行或近似平行,部分穿过共用墙,83 英尺 11 英寸(契据),82.54 英尺(实际);由此向东 26 英尺 9 6/10 英寸(契据),24.40 英尺(实际),至一条线上的某一点,该点距离 Prince 街北侧向北 86 英尺 1 英寸(契据),86.08 英尺(实际),该线与 Mott 街东侧平行或近似平行,并与 Prince 街北侧交于一点,该点距离 Prince 街北侧与 Mott 街东侧交汇点向东测量为 54 英尺 7 1/4 英寸(契据),55.61 英尺(实际);由此向南,沿上述与 Mott 街平行或近似平行的线,部分穿过共用墙,86 英尺 1 英寸(契据),86.08 英尺(实际),至 Prince 街北侧;由此沿 Prince 街北侧向西,26 英尺 9 6/10 英寸(契据),27.67 英尺(实际),至起点。街区:508 地块:52。

上述待售房产地址为 29 PRINCE STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10012(“地块 A”)。地块 B:位于纽约州纽约市纽约县曼哈顿区的所有特定地块、碎片或土地,其边界及描述如下:起点位于 Thompson 街西侧的一点,距离该 Thompson 街西侧与 Prince 街北侧交汇点向北 169 英尺 6 英寸;由此向西,与 Prince 街平行,100 英尺;由此向北,与 Thompson 街平行,24 英尺 8 英寸;由此向东,与 Prince 街平行,部分距离穿过共用墙,100 英尺至 Thompson 街西侧;由此沿 Thompson 街西侧向南,24 英尺 8 英寸至起点。街区:517 地块:31。

上述待售房产地址为 137 THOMPSON STREET,亦称 135-137 THOMPSON STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10012(“地块 B”)。

地块 C:位于纽约州纽约市纽约县曼哈顿区的全部特定地块、片区或土地,其边界及描述如下:起点位于 Prince 街南侧的一点,该点距离 Prince 街南侧与 Mott 街东侧交汇处向东 47 英尺 6 英寸;由此向南并与 Mott 街东侧平行延伸 114 英尺 7 英寸至某一点;由此向东,沿其北侧与前述方向成 88 度 04 分 30 秒夹角的线延伸 23 英尺 1 英寸至某一点;由此向北,沿其西侧与前述方向成 91 度 55 分 30 秒夹角的线延伸 109 英尺至 街南侧的一点,该点距离起点向东 24 英尺;由此沿 街南侧向西延伸 24 英尺(记录值),23 英尺 7 英寸(测量值)至起点。街区:493 批地:15。拟出售的上述房产地址为 26 STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10012(“地块 C”)。(地块 A、地块 B 和地块 C 合称为“房产”)。

根据判决,房产将作为一个整体地块出售,不得分割或单独出售。该房产整体的判决金额约为 \4667.8万美元.90,外加利息及费用。

房产的出售将受已提交判决的条款及即将公布的销售条款约束。民事诉讼案号:23, cv. 05586 (RAF) (QTW)。

STEPHEN F. ELLMAN, ESQ., 裁判员

MATTHEW MANNION, 来自 Mannion Auctions, LLC,担任拍卖师

Holland & Knight, LLP

原告律师

787 Seventh Avenue, 31st Floor,

New York, New York 10019

---

《统一商业法典》公开拍卖公告

请注意,持牌拍卖师 Matthew D. Mannion(DCA 编号 1434494)及其所属的 Mannon Auctions, LLC,代表纽约有限责任公司 L&L Capital Partners LLC(以下简称“担保方”),将于 2026 年 10 月 16 日东部时间下午 1:00 p.m. (00),在 Braunstein Turkish LLP 律师事务所办公室(地址:7600 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 402, Woodbury, New York 11797)举行公开拍卖,同时通过 Zoom 进行远程拍卖(会议链接:https: / us06web.zoom.us / j / 88017043260?pwd=Z1QJhJb4MkKXkJ167ifzPyLqOKEfM;1; 1;会议 ID:880 1704 3260;会议密码:254998;拨入电话:+1 646 558 8656)。此次拍卖涉及根据《统一商业法典》出售纽约有限责任公司 Royal Energy Properties LLC(以下简称“物业所有者”)的有限责任公司成员权益(以下简称“权益”),该实体是位于纽约州米尔顿(Milton)Route 9W 1666-1672 号房地产的绝对所有权持有者。上述权益代表物业所有者 100% 的所有权权益,由特拉华有限责任公司 Royal Energy Properties Delaware LLC 持有。

该权益将作为一个单一拍品,按“现状(AS-IS, WHERE-IS)”出售。担保方或任何代表担保方行事的人员不对其提供任何形式的明示或暗示保证、陈述、声明或条件,且担保方或任何代表担保方行事的人员不承担任何追索责任。中标者应负责支付与购买该权益相关的所有转让税、印花税及类似税费。

所有意向参与方须在拍卖前至少 5 天向担保方律师提供至少 \$100,000 的押金。所有出价(担保方的信用出价除外)必须以美元计价。中标者必须准备在销售后二十四 (24) 小时内,通过电汇或银行支票向担保方交付可立即使用的可用资金,并遵守其他竞拍要求。

欲了解有关权益出售更多信息的意向方,请联系担保方律师 Braunstein Turkish LLP(地址:7600 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 402, Woodbury, New York 11797,联系人:Vincent L. Georgetti, Esq.,电话:(516) 802-0700 分机 312,电子邮件:vg@braunsteinturkish.com)。

CSGP / 22.21 / -0.46

Costco / COST / 959.44 / 12.52

Companp / CPNG / 15.28 / -0.54

Crane / CR / 204.54 / -0.21

Credicorp / BAP / 381.87 / 0.66

CredoTech / CRDO / 200.84 / -15.71

CrowdStrike / CRWD / 263.01 / -12.03

CrownCastle / CCI / 81.01 / 1.37

Crown Holdings / CCK / 108.51 / 0.25

Cullen / Frost / CFR / 151.77 / 1.53

Cummins / CMI / 527.86 / 4.47

Gurtiss-Wright / CW / 504.16 / -8.44

DCI / 86.47 / -0.46

DoorDash / DASH / 114.24 / -2.26

Dover / DOV / 190.88 / 2.05

Dow / DOW / 28.12 / -0.30

DrReddy'sLab / RDY / 12.82 / 0.34

DraftKings / DKNG / 19.66 / 0.08

DukeEnergy / DUK / 117.69 / 1.04

DuPont / DD / 129.37 / -0.63

Dynatrace / DT / 65.25 / 1.75

EMCOR / EME / 779.16 / -10.29

ENI / E / 56.77 / 0.77

EOG

EOG Resources | EOG< / > 150.51< / > 2.35< / > | EQT< / > EQT< / > 53.22< / > 0.39< / >< / > EastWest Bancorp< / > EWBC< / > 125.56< / > 0.03< / >< / > EastGroup< / > EGP< / > 197.45< / > 1.47< / >< / > Eaton< / > ETN< / > 426.69< / > 2.96< / >< / > eBay< / > EBAY< / > 114.65< / > 2.46< / >< / > EchoStar< / > ECHO< / > 95.10< / > 0.26< / >< / > Ecolab< / > ECL< / > 284.30< / > 2.47< / >< / > Ecopetrol< / > EC< / > 17.23< / > 0.29< / >< / > Edison Intl< / > EIX< / > 55.64< / > 0.34< / >< / > Edwards Life< / > EW< / > 86.39< / > 1.18< / > |

---

商业机会

---

成熟珠宝交易中心

---

1300万美元 2025 Revenue Totally Turnkey

---

高端珠宝零售与贷款业务

\- 多元化营收渠道:财务状况记录完整。

  • 入门门槛高,当地竞争有限。

\- 已为扩张做好准备。

---

更多信息:

Yuval 347-537-8205 或 Yuvalelkeslasi@yahoo.com

---

华尔街日报

---

市场广场

---

即刻投放广告

---

(800) 366-3975

欲了解更多信息,请访问:wsj.com / classifieds

© 2026 道琼斯公司 (Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

版权所有。

[...OMITTED...] 59.19 [...OMITTED...] 3.09 [......] 富途 (Futu) [......] FUTU [......] 112.26 [......] 1.45 [......]

[......] 洲际酒店 (InterContHtls) [......] IHG [......] 159.85 [......] 0.83 [......] IBM [......] IBM [......] 227.02 [......] 0.11 [......] 国际香精香料 (IntlFlavors) [......] IFF [......] 84.96 [......] 0.41 [......] 国际纸业 (IntlPaper) [......] IP [......] 31.74 [......] 0.38 [......] Intuit [......] INTU [......] 305.99 [......] 3.24 [......] 直觉外科 (IntuitiveSurgical) [......] ISRG [......] 427.64 [......] 3.68 [......] InvitatHomes [......] INVH [......] 26.70 [......] 0.09 [......] IonQ公司 [......] IONQ [......] 36.27 [......] 3.62 [......] IronMountain [......] IRM [......] 115.10 [......] 0.59 [......] 伊塔乌银行 (ItauUnibanco) [......] ITUB [......] 10.06 [......] 0.10 [......]

JKL

GHI

[......] JBS [......] JBS [......] 12.86 [......] 0.12 [......] 京东 (JD.com) [......] JD [......] 26.72 [......] 0.37 [......] 摩根大通 (JPMorganChase) [......] JPM [......] 334.30 [......] 1.31 [......] Jabil [......] JBL [......] 31.012 [......] 5.73 [......] JackHenry [......] JKHY [......] 149.63 [......] 0.32 [......] JacobsSolns [......] J [......] 139.43 [......] 0.28 [......] JamesHardie [......] JHX [......] 24.76 [......] 0.36 [......] JazzPharm [......] JAZZ [......] 216.75 [......] 1.67 [......] JefferiesFinl [......] JEF [......] 45.01 [......] 0.63 [......] JFrog [......] FROG [......] 99.02 [......] 3.21 [......] 强生 (J&J) [......] JNJ [......] 263.73 [......] 2.29 [......] JohnsonControls [......] JCI [......] 155.41 [......] 2.03 [......] JonesLang [......] JLL [......] 298.10 [......] 1.77 [......] KB

Financial [......] KB [......] 121.98 [......] 1.09 [......] 贝壳 (KE Holdings) [......] BEKE [......] 17.68 [......] 0.16 [......] KKR [......] KKR [......] 91.51 [......] 0.56 [......] KLA [......] KLAC [......] 190.12 [......] 5.45 [......] KT [......] KT [......] 18.20 [......] 0.10 [......] Kaspi.kz [......] KSPI [......] 97.17 [......] 4.18 [......] Kenvue [......] KVUE [......] 17.83 [......] 0.13 [......] KeurigDrPepper [......] KDP [......] 32.75 [......] 0.99 [......] KeyCorp [......] KEY [......] 20.09 [......] 0.12 [......] KeysightTech [......] KEYS [......] 377.70 [......] 5.05 [......] 金佰利-克拉克 (KimveryClark)

KMB [......] 98.77 [......] 11.18 [......] [......] KimcoRealty [......] KIM [......] 22.32 [......] 0.16 [......] KinderMorgan [......] KMI [......] 33.08 [......] 0.59 [......] KinrossGold [......] KGC [......] 23.55 [......] 0.19 [......] Knight-Swift [......] KNX [......] 64.52 [......] 0.05 [......] 飞利浦 (Philips) [......] PHG [......] 24.74 [......] 0.50 [......] 韩国电力 (KoreaElecPwr) [......] KEP [......] 10.60 [......] 0.43 [......] 卡夫亨氏 (KraftHeinz) [......] KHC [......] 22.45 [......] 0.18 [......] 克罗格超市 (Kroger) [......] KR [......] 62.56 [......] 0.92 [......] KrystalBiotech [......] KRYS [......] 332.07 [......] 0.46 [......] KymeraTherap [......] KYMR [......] 112.08 [......] 0.32 [......] 拉美航空 (Latam Airlines) [......] LTM [......] 50.00 [......] 0.25 [......] LPL

Financial | LPLA< / > 330.12< / > -0.76< / > | L3HarrisTech< / > LHX< / > 238.25< / > 1.28< / >< / > Labcorp< / > LB< / > 315.52< / > 3.37< / >< / > LamResearch< / > LRCX< / > 308.70< / > -9.28< / >< / > LamarAdv< / > LAMR< / > 146.87< / > 0.49< / >< / > Las Vegas Sands< / > LVS< / > 36.15< / > -0.02< / >< / > LatticeSemi< / > LSCC< / > 122.84< / > -3.21< / >< / > Leidos< / > LDOS< / > 121.60< / > -0.08< / >< / > Lennar A< / > LEN< / > 74.65< / > -2.04< / >< / > Lennar

B< / > LENB< / > 74.08< / > -1.94< / >< / > LennoxIntl< / > LII< / > 356.72< / > 0.28< / >< / > LeonardoDRS< / > DRS< / > 35.62< / > -0.62< / >< / > LiAuto< / > LI< / > 11.40< / > -0.14< / >< / > LibertyLiveA< / > LLVYA< / > 94.17< / > -1.16< / >< / > LibertyLiveC< / > LLYVK< / > 96.93< / > -1.27< / >< / > LibertyMediaF< / > FWONK< / > 93.81< / > -0.23< / >< / > LibertyMediaA< / > FWONA< / > 86.39< / > -0.28< / >< / > LifeTime< / > LTH< / > 40.37< / > -0.25< / >< / > Eli

Lilly< / > LLY< / > 1182.62< / > 3.35< / >< / > LincolnElectric< / > LECO< / > 259.69< / > -1.44< / >< / > Linde< / > LIN< / > 487.35< / > 3.62< / >< / > Littelfuse< / > LFUS< / > 413.84< / > -12.66< / >< / > LiveNationEnt< / > LYV< / > 169.64< / > -0.69< / >< / > LloydsBanking< / > LYG< / > 5.46< / > 0.05< / >< / > LockheedMartin< / > LMT< / > 511.88< / > 2.29< / >< / > Loews< / > L< / > 107.78< / > 1.09< / >< / > LogitechIntl< / > LOGI< / > 98.33< / > 0.06< / >< / > Lowe's< / > LOW< / > 185.57< / > -0.43< / >< / > lululemon< / > LULU< / > 94.66< / > 0.16< / >< / > Lumentum< / > LITE< / > 955.41< / > -107.95< / >< / > LyondellBasell< / > LYB< / > 59.41< / > -0.62< / > |

GE Aerospace GE< / > 308.64< / > 0.44< / >< / > GE HealthCare GEHC< / > 67.74< / > 2.00< / >< / > GE Vernova GEV< / > 996.80< / > -7.93< / >< / > GFLEnvironmental GFL< / > 42.38< / > -0.40< / >< / > GSK< / > 6K< / > 46.92< / >< / > Gallagher AJ< / > 233.92< / > 1.22< / >< / > GameStop GME< / > 27.23< / > 0.67< / >< / > Gaming&Leisure GLPI< / > 38.48< / > 0.20< / >< / > Garmin GRMN< / > 266.76< / > -1.60< / >< / > Gartner IT< / > 194.10< / > 2.95< / >< / > GenDigital GEN< / > 23.35< / > 0.10< / >< / > Generac GNRC< / > 218.37< / > -6.57< / >< / > GeneralDynamics GD< / > 335.46< / > 4.19< / >< / > GeneralMills GIS< / > 32.70< / > 0.41< / >< / > GeneralMotors

GM< / > 82.37< / > -0.36< / >< / > Genmab GMAB< / > 37.37< / > 0.30< / >< / > GenuineParts GPC< / > 129.62< / > 2.60< / >< / > Gerdau GGB< / > 5.14< / > 0.02< / >< / > GileadSciences GILD< / > 150.43< / > -0.74< / >< / > GitLab GTLB< / > 56.10< / > 0.92< / >< / > Glaukos GKOS< / > 168.02< / > 2.33< / >< / > GlobalPayments GPN< / > 82.06< / > -0.14< / >< / > GlobalFoundries GFS< / > 48.34< / > -0.10< / >< / > Globalstar GSAT< / > 100.04< / > -0.76< / >< / > GlobeLife GI< / > 165.12< / > 0.95< / >< / > GlobusMedical GMD< / > 76.24< / > 1.59< / >< / > GoDaddy GDDY< / > 102.32< / > -2.03< / >< / > GoldFields GFI< / > 36.76< / > -0.06< / >< / > GoldmanSachs GS< / > 893.95< / > -1.37< / >< / > Grab

GRAB | 3.15< / > -0.04< / > | Graco GGG< / > 78.81< / > 0.60< / >< / > Grainger GWW< / > 1306.73< / > 16.94< / >< / > GAP PAC< / > 202.79< / > 1.29< / >< / > GrupoCibest CIB< / > 94.96< / > 0.15< / >< / > GuardantHealth GH< / > 162.79< / > -4.68< / >< / > Guidewire GWRE< / > 164.74< / > -2.58< / >< / > HCA Healthcare HCA< / > 458.60< / > 7.51< / >< / > HDFC Bank HDB< / > 22.58< / > 0.30< / >< / > HF Sinclair DINO< / > 122.91< / > 1.61< / >< / > HP HPQ< / > 29.87< / > -0.33< / >< / > HSBC HSBC< / > 94.32< / > 1.34< / >< / > H World HTHT< / > 44.55< / > 0.39< / >< / > Haleon HLN< / > 9.50< / > 0.18< / >< / > Halliburton HAL< / > 32.60< / > 0.05< / >< / > HalozymeTherap

HALO< / > 111.08< / > 0.66< / >< / > HarmonyGold HMY< / > 16.68< / > -0.20< / >< / > HartfordIns HIG< / > 130.19< / > 1.08< / >< / > Hasbro HAS< / > 94.73< / > 1.41< / >< / > HealthpeakProp DOC< / > 18.95< / > 0.15< / >< / > HeclaMining HL< / > 16.84< / > -0.23< / >< / > Heico HEI< / > 297.09< / > -1.19< / >< / > HeicoA HELA< / > 222.87< / > -0.18< / >< / > HenrySchein HSIC< / > 84.23< / > 0.22< / >< / > Hershey HSY< / > 163.84< / > 1.10< / >< / > HewlettPackard HPE< / > 70.33< / > -3.13< / >< / > Hilton HLT< / > 327.54< / > 0.98< / >< / > HomeDepot HD< / > 290.62< / > -0.12< / >< / > HondaMotor HMC< / > 32.66< / > -0.04< / >< / > Honeywell Aero HONA< / > 157.27< / > -0.67< / >< / > Honeywell

HON< / > 209.64< / > 1.91< / > |

lithicPower< / > MPWR< / > 1193.23< / > -67.06< / >< / > MonsterBev< / > MNST< / > 43.76< / > 0.12< / >< / > Moody's< / > MCO< / > 470.50< / > 6.27< / >< / > Moog A< / > MOGA< / > 371.76< / > 8.67< / >< / > MorganStanley< / > MA< / > 190.02< / > -2.2< / >< / > MotorolaSol< / > MSI< / > 466.33< / > 2.15< / >< / > MuellerInds< / > MLI< / > 60.87< / > 0.16< / >< / > MurphyUSA< / > MUSA< / > 525.47< / > -3.67< / >< / > NVIDIA Energy< / > NRG< / > 106.37< / > -1.60< / >< / > NVR< / > NVR< / > 5749.96< / > -149.20< / >< / > NXP

Semicon< / > NXPI< / > 225.21< / > -2.31< / >< / > Nasdaq< / > NDAQ< / > 94.29< / > 0.64< / >< / > Natera< / > NTRA< / > 397.77< / > -2.94< / >< / > NationalGrid< / > NGG< / > 77.12< / > 0.64< / >< / > NatWest< / > NWG< / > 17.24< / > 0.11< / >< / > Nebius< / > NBIS< / > 210.06< / > -11.01< / >< / > NetApp< / > NTAP< / > 239.18< / > 2.03< / >< / > NetEase< / > NTES< / > 125.41< / > 1.17< / >< / > Netflix< / > NFLX< / > 70.61< / > 0.31< / >< / > Neurocrine< / > NBIX< / > 141.37< / > -1.07< / >< / > NYTimes A< / > NYT< / > 66.08< / > -0.24< / >< / > Newmont< / > NEM< / > 117.15< / > -0.69< / >< / > NewsCorp A< / > NWSA< / > 29.38< / > 0.26< / >< / > NewsCorp

>-0.06< / >< / > NuHoldings< / > NU< / > 16.01< / > -0.11< / >< / > Nucor< / > NUE< / > 251.83< / > 1.50< / >< / > Nutanix< / > NTNX< / > 74.14< / > -0.49< / >< / > Nutrien< / > NTR< / > 68.00< / > 0.52< / >< / > nVentElectric< / > NVT< / > 162.78< / > -4.65< / >< / > NVIDIA< / > NVDA< / > 226.32< / > -2.96< / > |

M N | Macom Tech< / > MTSI< / > 306.34< / > -23.70< / >< / > M&T Bank< / > MTB< / > 219.89< / > 2.40< / >< / > MKS< / > MKSI< / > 249.91< / > -14.59< / >< / > MPLX< / > MPLX< / > 56.83< / > 0.53< / >< / > MSCI< / > MSCI< / > 568.01< / > 2.89< / >< / > MadisonAirSins< / > MAIR< / > 23.29< / > -0.93< / >< / > MSG< / > MAS< / > 68.98< / > 0.23< / >< / > MasTec< / > MTZ< / > 206.85< / > -5.80< / >< / > Mastercard< / > MA< / > 595.09< / > 5.95< / > |

O P Q

Oracle< / > ORCL< / > 137.39< / > -4.01< / >< / > Orix< / > IX< / > 36.85< / > -0.10< / >< / > OscarHealth< / > OSCR< / > 34.01< / > 0.64< / >< / > OtisWorldwide< / > OTIS< / > 66.75< / > 0.80< / >< / > Ovintiv< / > OVV< / > 65.12< / > 1.24< / >< / > OwensCorning< / > OC< / > 112.61< / > -1.55< / >< / > PBF Energy< / > PBF< / > 85.02< / > 0.75< / >< / > PDD< / > PDD< / > 80.92< / > -0.43< / >< / > PG&E< / > PCG< / > 13.16< / > 0.03< / >< / > PNC Finl< / > PNC< / > 221.26< / > 2.05< / >< / > POSCO< / > PKX< / > 55.64< / > -1.84< / >< / > PPG< / > PPG< / > 70.76< / > -1.52< / >< / > PublicStorage< / > PSA< / > 288.88< / > -0.98< / >< / > PulteGroup< / > PHM< / > 111.14< / > -0.98< / >< / > QXO< / > QXO< / > 10.64< / > -0.17< / >< / > Qiagen< / > QGEN< / > 45.31< / > -0.07< / >< / > QnityElec< / > Q< / > 123.21< / > -3.39< / >< / > Qualcomm< / > QCOM< / > 174.43< / > -1.07< / >< / > QuantaServices< / > PWR< / > 694.79< / > -11.15< / >< / > Quantinuum< / > QNT< / > 39.52< / > -1.78< / > |

---

新高与新低

以下解释适用于在最新交易日中创下 52 周盘中新高或新低的纽约证券交易所(NYSE)、NYSE Arca、NYSE American 和纳斯达克股票市场股票。% CHG 为较前一交易日的每日百分比变化。

2026年10月12日,星期一

19.37 | 1.2< / > | BaxterFoods< / > TBBD< / > 56.37< / > 1.3< / >< / > BW LPG< / > BWLP< / > 26.71< / > 0.9< / >< / > BancoBradesco< / > BBDO< / > 4.16< / > 0.5< / >< / > Biogen< / > BIIB< / > 238.24< / > 1.6< / >< / > BlackHawkAcqn< / > BKHA< / > 23.00< / > 12.7< / >< / > BlueportAcqnA< / > BPAC< / > 10.24< / > ...< / >< / > Box< / > BOX< / > 37.30< / > 0.9< / >< / > C&F Fin< / > CFFI< / > 104.39< / > 1.9< / >< / > CMBTECH< / > CMBT< / > 21.19< / > 1.6< / >< / > CalamosCap< / > CAPN< / > 11.97< / > 2.5< / >< / > ChainBridgeBncp< / > CBNA< / > 54.11< / > 1.4< / >< / > CEMIG Pref< / > CIG.C< / > 4.04< / > -4.7< / >< / > CompX
Fortinet< / > FTNT< / > 196.89< / > -0.9< / >< / > Frontline< / > FRO< / > 59.55< / > 5.5< / >< / > FutureVisionl< / > FVNNU< / > 49.00< / > 6.9< / >< / > GameStop< / > GME< / > 27.25< / > 2.5< / >< / > GenieEnergy< / > GNE< / > 16.95< / > 1.4< / >< / > GigaCloudTech< / > GCT< / > 58.17< / > 0.8< / >< / > GitLab< / > GTLB< / > 56.64< / > 1.7< / >< / > HF
PD< / > 16.57< / > 0.5< / > |

40.6< / >< / > ToromGroup< / > WYES< / > 15.75< / > 1.9< / >< / > XP< / > XP< / > 32.73< / > 1.2< / >< / > X3Acqn< / > XCBE< / > 10.04< / > 0.1< / >< / > ZimIntShipping< / > ZIM< / > 30.98< / > 3.0< / > | LgRs< / >< / > 18.00< / > A< / > ACRpc< / > 17.09 - 12.9< / >< / > 17.00< / > A< / > ACRPd< / > 14.05 - 6.3< / >< / > 13.00< / > ADlGldStr< / > ADlg< / > 16.49 0.9< / >< / > 12.00< / > AMASSBrands< / > AMSS< / > 0.32 1.8< / >< / > 11.00< / > AMTD Idea< / > AMTD< / > 0.42 - 18.4< / >< / > 10.00< / > ASP Isotopes< / > ASPI< / > 2.41 - 7.9< / >< / > 10.00< / > ATCA Creativity< / > AACG< / > 0.66 1.7< / >< / > 9.00< / > AT&T Nts 2066< / > TBB< / > 18.29 - 1.0< / >< / > 8.00< / > AT&T PfdC< / > TFC< / > 15.62 - 1.1< / >< / > 7.00< / > AT&T Health< / > ATHT< / > 1.00 - 1.0< / >< / > 6.00< / > abrdnGblInfrmCF< / > ASGlr< / > 0.01

31.1< / >< / > 5.00< / > AccendaHealth< / > ACH< / > 0.38 - 8.8< / >< / > 1.00< / > Accuracy< / > ARAY< / > 0.21 - 5.0< / >< / > 1.00< / > ActuateTherap< / > ACTU< / > 0.60 5.5< / >< / > 1.00< / > AdicetBio< / > ACET< / > 5.17 - 1.4< / >< / > 1.00< / > AegonNts2049< / > AEFC< / > 17.01 - 2.4< / >< / > 1.00< / > AeroVironment< / > AVAV< / > 131.50 - 4.1< / >< / > 1.00< / > AleratedNts54< / > MGRE< / > 20.30 - 1.0< / >< / > 1.00< / > Ainos< / > AIMD< / > 1.10 - 5.8< / >< / > 1.00< / > Akanda< / > AKAN< / > 1.64 - 6.8< / >< / > 1.00< / > AkebiaTherap< / > AKBA< / > 0.77 - 1.4< / >< / > 1.00< / > Algorhythm< / > RIME< / > 0.13 - 2.6< / >< / > 1.00< / > AltisourcePtfWt< / > ASPSZ< / > 0.13 。

6.9 | 1.00< / > Amarin< / > AMRN< / > 11.39 - 4.2< / >< / > 1.00< / > AmerBatteryTech< / > ABAT< / > 1.83 - 7.1< / >< / > 1.00< / > AmgeniVanguard< / > AMGN< / > 1.83 - 7.1< / >< / > 1.00< / > AnfieldEnergy< / > AEC< / > 3.11 - 4.9< / >< / > 1.00< / > AppliedAerospace< / > AADX< / > 10.71 - 5.9< / >< / > 1.00< / > AquaMetals< / > AQMS< / > 1.64 - 2.0< / >< / > 1.00< / > ArloRebery< / > ABR< / > 2.77 - 1.4< / > |

d>-14.7< / >< / > AshfordHospFid< / > AHTpD< / > 3.50< / > -0.5< / >< / > AspenInsPrd< / > ASHL< / > 21.73< / > -2.3< / >< / > AspenElectric< / > AME< / > 1.14< / > -3.4< / >< / > AtlasCriticalMnl< / > ATCX< / > 2.38< / > -8.5< / >< / > AtlasLithium< / > ATLX< / > 2.07< / > -8.7< / >< / > AttoviaTherap< / > ATTO< / > 14.44< / > -10.0< / >< / > aTyrPharma< / > ATYR< / > 0.21< / > -12.8< / >< / > AuroralinnowWt< / > AUROW< / > 0.02< / > -22.7< / >< / > authiD< / > AUDI< / > 0.31< / > -7.8< / >< / > Aware< / > AWRE< / > 1.00< / > -3.8< / >< / > AGG

neusPrfdA< / > BHFAO< / > 13.51< / > -1.5< / >< / > BrighthouseFinlPC< / > BFHAN< / > 10.77< / > -1.6< / >< / > BrookfieldFinNts< / > BNH< / > 14.12< / > -1.4< / >< / > BrunswickNts2049< / > BcPC< / > 22.08< / > 0.2< / >< / > BuildersFirst< / > BLDR< / > 51.93< / > -1.3< / >< / > CDT Equity< / > CDT< / > 0.63< / > -8.1< / >< / > CDT EquityWt< / > CDTW< / > 0.00< / > -76.7< / >< / > CISO

LS< / > 1.14< / > -6.3< / >< / > Centrex< / > CETX< / > 1.92< / > -6.3< / >< / > CentrusEnergy< / > LEU< / > 134.46< / > -5.0< / >< / > CenturyCasinos< / > CNTY< / > 0.82< / > -2.1< / >< / > CerebrasSystems< / > CRS< / > 145.75< / > -10.7< / >< / > CharlLcomms< / > CHTR< / > 1.63< / > -0.9< / >< / > CharterCommPlsE< / > CHTRP< / > 21.45< / > -1.1< / >< / > ChengHeAcplIIWt< / > CHEW< / > 0.06< / > 20.4< / > |

>Revity< / > RVTY< / > 155.61< / > 1.43< / >< / > RioTinto< / > RIO< / > 94.30< / > -0.48< / >< / > Rivian< / > RIVN< / > 13.54< / > -0.42< / >< / > Robinhood< / > HOOD< / > 109.22< / > 0.20< / >< / > Roblox< / > RBLX< / > 49.58< / > 1.49< / >< / > RocketCos.< / > RKT< / > 10.87< / > -0.61< / >< / > RocketLab< / > RKLb< / > 65.71< / > -2.50< / >< / > Rockwell< / > ROK< / > 433.97< / > 1.38< / >< / > RogersComm

B< / > RCI< / > 29.90< / > 0.12< / >< / > RoivantSciences< / > ROIV< / > 34.59< / > -0.85< / >< / > Roku< / > ROKU< / > 152.81< / > -0.04< / >< / > Rollins< / > ROL< / > 32.07< / > 0.09< / >< / > RoperTech< / > ROP< / > 367.32< / > 3.23< / >< / > RossStores< / > ROST< / > 225.84< / > 3.43< / >< / > RoyalBkCanada< / > RY< / > 192.76< / > 0.85< / >< / > RoyalCaribbean< / > RCL< / > 280.67< / > -1.59< / >< / > RoyalGold< / > RGLD< / > 236.91< / > 0.68< / >< / > RoyaltyPharma< / > RPRX< / > 57.78< / > 0.85< / >< / > Rubrik< / > RBRK< / > 120.01< / > -5.13< / >< / > RyanSpecialty< / > RYAN< / > 37.25< / > 0.24< / >< / > Ryanair< / > RYAI< / > 53.00< / > -1.24< / >< / > | RyderSystem R | 237.51< / > -1.04< / > | SAP< / > SAP< / > 217.85< / > 3.07< / >< / > S&P Global< / > SPGI< / > 412.19< / > 4.37< / >< / > SBA Comm< / > SBAC< / > 184.28< / > 1.79< / >< / > SEI Investments< / > SEIC< / > 105.00< / > 0.30< / >< / > SK hynix< / > SKHY< / > 162.23< / > -6.80< / >< / > SK Telecom< / > KEM< / > 33.49< / > -0.78< / >< / > SLB< / > SLB< / > 48.77< / > -0.19< / >< / > SS&C

>-1.85< / >< / > SynchronyFinl< / > SYF< / > 73.62< / > 0.82< / >< / > Synopsys< / > SNPs< / > 502.51< / > -7.48< / >< / > Sysco< / > SYY< / > 78.70< / > 0.56< / > |

股票< / > 代码< / > 收盘价< / > 净涨跌< / >< / > TakedaPharm TAK< / > 18.68< / > -0.05< / > < / >< / > TalenEnergy TLN< / > 379.77< / > 1.20< / > < / >< / > Tapestry TPR< / > 117.22< / > 0.98< / > < / >< / > TargaResources TRGP< / > 290.54< / > 3.84< / > < / >< / > Target TGT< / > 153.62< / > -0.02< / > < / >< / > TechnipFMC FTI< / > 69.75< / > 0.18< / > < / >< / > TeckResourcesB TECK< / > 67.54< / > -0.51< / > < / >< / > TeledyneTech TDY< / > 613.66< / > ...< / > < / >< / > Ericsson ERIC< / > 9.37< / > -0.19< / > < / >< / > TelefonicaBras VIV< / > 12.16< / > -0.04< / > < / >< / > TelekomIndns TLK< / > 12.78< / > -0.05< / > < / >< / > TempusAI

TEM< / > 67.99< / > -2.94< / > < / >< / > 10xGenomics TGX< / > 75.19< / > -5.46< / > < / >< / > Tenaris TS< / > 58.05< / > 0.71< / > < / >< / > TencentMusic TME< / > 8.45< / > 0.07< / > < / >< / > TenetHealthcare THC< / > 268.76< / > 4.98< / > < / >< / > Teradyne TER< / > 383.85< / > -18.83< / > < / >< / > Tesla TSLA< / > 378.03< / > -4.60< / > < / >< / > TevaPharmInds TEVA< / > 41.17< / > 0.07< / > < / >< / > TexasInstruments TXN< / > 281.74< / > -2.00< / > < / >< / > TexasPacLand TPL< / > 365.32< / > 4.34< / > < / >< / > TexasRoadhouse TXRH< / > 158.81< / > -2.69< / > < / >< / > Textron TXT< / > 75.78< / > 1.62< / > < / >< / > ThermoFisher

TMO< / > 662.24< / > 4.22< / > < / >< / > ThomsonReuters TRI< / > 104.25< / > 1.04< / > < / >< / > 3M MMM< / > 160.89< / > 0.93< / > < / >< / > Toast TOST< / > 31.32< / > 0.01< / > < / >< / > TollBros TOL< / > 132.15< / > -0.98< / > < / >< / > Toro TTC< / > 96.65< / > 0.86< / > < / >< / > TorontoDomBk < / > 116.49< / > 1.39< / > < / >< / > TotalEnergies TTE< / > 88.37< / > 2.26< / > < / >< / > TowerSemi TSEM< / > 216.50< / > -12.21< / > < / >< / > ToyotaMotor TM< / > 184.72< / > -0.58< / > < / >< / > TractorSupply TSCO< / > 33.45< / > -0.25< / > < / >< / > Tradeweb TW< / > 110.63< / > -0.45< / > < / >< / > TraneTech TT< / > 477.55< / > 0.57< / > < / >< / > TransDigm

TDG | 1119.94< / > 11.95< / > < / > | TransUnion TRU< / > 66.07< / > 0.59< / > < / >< / > Travelers TRV< / > 371.68< / > 2.93< / > < / >< / > Trimble TRMB< / > 59.49< / > -0.60< / > < / >< / > Trip.com TCOM< / > 38.76< / > -0.14< / > < / >< / > TruistFinl TFC< / > 46.64< / > 0.53< / > < / >< / > Twilio TWLO< / > 282.66< / > -6.81< / > < / >< / > TwistBiosci TWST< / > 151.86< / > -7.92< / > < / >< / > TylerTech TYL< / > 339.94< / > 10.39< / > < / >< / > TysonFoods TSN< / > 53.57< / > 0.14< / > < / >< / > UBS Group UBS< / > 47.82< / > -0.31< / > < / >< / > UDR UDR< / > 34.02< / > -0.10< / > < / >< / > U-Haul UHAL< / > 56.22< / > -1.17< / > < / >< / > U-Haul N

UHALB< / > 49.55< / > -0.82< / > < / >< / > UL Solutions ULS< / > 71.18< / > 1.19< / > < / >< / > UMB Fin UMBF< / > 131.27< / > 0.97< / > < / >< / > US Foods USFD< / > 97.70< / > 0.27< / > < / >< / > Uber UBER< / > 71.50< / > -0.01< / > < / >< / > Ubiquiti UI< / > 619.56< / > -37.73< / > < / >< / > UltaBeauty ULTA< / > 567.47< / > -2.90< / > < / >< / > Unilever UL< / > 62.95< / > 0.69< / > < / >< / > UnionPacific UNP< / > 281.57< / > 3.23< / > < / >< / > UnitedAirlines UAL< / > 104.44< / > -3.02< / > < / >< / > UnitedMicro UMC< / > 22.55< / > -0.41< / > < / >< / > UPS B UPS< / > 95.34< / > 0.77< / > < / >< / > UnitedRentals URE< / > 1056.92< / > 0.55< / > < / >< / > US Bancorp

USB< / > 177.42< / > 0.94< / > < / >< / > UnitedTherap UTHR< / > 559.42< / > 0.94< / > < / >< / > UnitySoftware UNH< / > 378.52< / > -0.78< / > < / >< / > UnitySoftware U< / > 46.68< / > -0.20< / > < / >< / > UniversalHealthUHS< / > 178.83< / > 1.48< / > < / >< / > UnumGroup UNM< / > 92.51< / > 0.84< / > < / >< / > VICI Prop VICI< / > 23.03< / > 0.15< / > < / >< / > Vale VALE< / > 13.52< / > -0.10< / > < / >< / > ValeroEnergy VLO< / > 436.00< / > 2.25< / > < / >< / > ValmontInds VMI< / > 467.08< / > -0.73< / > < / >< / > Vaxcyte PCVX< / > 70.65< / > -0.73< / > < / >< / > VeevaSystems VEEV< / > 295.85< / > -0.28< / > < / >< / > Ventas

VTR< / > 83.54< / > 1.50< / > < / >< / > VentureGlobal VG< / > 13.13< / > -0.03< / > < / >< / > Veralto VLTO< / > 98.20< / > 1.27< / > < / >< / > VeriSign VRSN< / > 302.70< / > -1.04< / > < / >< / > VeriskAnalytics VRSK< / > 177.49< / > -0.14< / > < / >< / > Verizon VZ< / > 42.78< / > 1.13< / > < / >< / > VertexPharm VRTX< / > 507.00< / > -3.08< / > < / >< / > Vertiv VRT< / > 239.36< / > -3.42< / > < / >< / > ViaSat SATV< / > 67.66< / > -4.35< / > < / >< / > Viatris VTRS< / > 17.54< / > -0.10< / > < / >< / > ViaviSolutions VIAV< / > 41.75< / > -3.71< / > < / >< / > Vicor VICR< / > 259.40< / > -6.67< / > < / >< / > Viking VIK< / > 80.77< / > -0.85< / > < / >< / > ViperEnergy

VNOM | 43.37< / > 0.38< / > < / > | VirtuFinancial VIRT< / > 56.77< / > -0.74< / > < / >< / > Visa V< / > 389.27< / > 3.82< / > < / >< / > Vistra VST< / > 158.13< / > -3.35< / > < / >< / > VivmarkResidential VMKR< / > 61.25< / > 0.09< / > < / >< / > Vodafone VOD< / > 15.39< / > -0.17< / > < / >< / > VulcanMatls VMC< / > 245.15< / > 0.57< / > < / >< / > Vylor VYLR< / > 75.89< / > 2.74< / > < / > |

TUV

TC Energy< / > TRP< / > 60.56< / > 0.51< / >< / > Synnex< / > SNX< / > 273.06< / > -0.31< / >< / > TE Connectivity< / > TEL< / > 217.28< / > -1.01< / >< / > Telus< / > TU< / > 7.79< / > 0.07< / >< / > Ternium< / > TX< / > 57.94< / > -0.24< / >< / > TFI Intl< / > TFII< / > 112.81< / > -1.32< / >< / > TJX< / > TJX< / > 141.92< / > 3.16< / >< / > TKO< / > TKO< / > 173.45< / > -4.56< / >< / > T-MobileUS< / > TMUS< / > 151.87< / > 3.29< / >< / > TPG< / > TPG< / > 45.12< / > -0.14< / >< / > T.RowePrice< / > TROW< / > 103.99< / > -1.17< / >< / > TTM

Tech< / > TTMI< / > 110.33< / > -10.68< / >< / > TaiwanSemi< / > TSM< / > 444.35< / > -8.96< / >< / > Take-TwoSftwr< / > TTWO< / > 208.82< / > -4.62< / > |

< / > 36.51< / > -2.0< / >< / > EagleMaterials< / > EXP< / > 163.51< / > -0.7< / >< / > EdibleGarden< / > EDBL< / > 1.04< / > -2.8< / >< / > ElectraBratMyTrip< / > ELBM< / > 0.47< / > -3.1< / >< / > EmersonDiscSecs< / > EMD< / > 0.14< / > -6.4< / >< / > EnergyFuels< / > UEUU< / > 9.60< / > -3.0< / >< / > Enhanced< / > ENHA< / > 1.06< / > 20.0< / >< / > EntergyBds66< / > EAI< / > 18.36< / > -1.2< / >< / > EntergyLA Bds66< / > ELC< / > 18.08< / > -1.5< / >< / > EntergyMS

d< / > 8.03< / > -0.4< / >< / > FVIA Infra< / > FIP< / > 2.53< / > -2.6< / >< / > FTC Solar< / > FTCI< / > 1.79< / > -5.2< / >< / > Fathom< / > FTHM< / > 0.19< / > -6.5< / >< / > FedAgriMtgPfdG< / > AGMpG< / > 16.15< / > -1.2< / >< / > Femasys< / > FEMY< / > 1.71< / > -12.5< / >< / > Fermi< / > FRMI< / > 3.20< / > -5.2< / >< / > FervoEnergy< / > FRVO< / > 12.78< / > -6.4< / >< / > FirstCitizensPfdA< / > FCNCP< / > 17.61< / > -1.1< / >< / > FivePoint< / > FPH< / > 4.38< / > -1.8< / >< / > FrontForeTechWt< / > FTHAW< / > 0.17< / > -22.8< / >< / > Freshworks< / > GMCSK< / > 1.68< / > -0.4< / >< / > ForesightAuto< / > FRSX< / > 0.78< / > -6.8< / >< / > FrankBSP

PfdE< / > FBRTpE< / > 17.41< / > -0.8< / >< / > FreedomMetalsAcqn< / > FDMMM< / > 9.89< / > ...< / >< / > Freightos< / > CRGO< / > 0.79< / > -5.0< / >< / > FrontierNuclear< / > FNUC< / > 1.04< / > -0.9< / >< / > FultonFinlPfdA< / > FULTP< / > 16.21< / > -3.1< / >< / > FusemachSystemsWt< / > FUSEW< / > 0.02< / > -44.7< / >< / > FuturewaveAcqnRt< / > FWACR< / > 0.11< / > -8.2< / >< / > GuangzhouTechs< / > GMCX< / > 1.68< / > -1.8< / >< / > GSI

Tech< / > GSIT< / > 4.42< / > -6.4< / >< / > GalataAcqnllWt< / > LATAW< / > 0.18< / > -16.3< / >< / > GameYourGame< / > GGY< / > 0.44< / > -3.6< / >< / > GBankFinl< / > GBFH< / > 17.02< / > -1.3< / >< / > GilatSatellite< / > GILT< / > 8.27< / > -6.0< / > |

W | X< / > Y< / > Z< / > | WEC Energy< / > WEC< / > 104.91< / > 1.17< / >< / > W.P.Carey< / > WPC< / > 64.29< / > 0.92< / >< / > Wabtec< / > WAB< / > 285.77< / > 0.34< / >< / > Walmart< / > WMT< / > 113.08< / > 1.73< / >< / > WarnerMusic< / > WMG< / > 28.65< / > -0.07< / >< / > WasteConnections< / > WCN< / > 153.71< / > 0.88< / >< / > WasteMgt< / > WM< / > 211.14< / > 2.31< / >< / > Waters< / > WAT< / > 432.10< / > -1.67< / >< / > Watsco [...OMITTED...] YPF< / > YPF< / > 51.97< / > 1.93< / >< / > Yum!Brands< / > YUM< / > 146.75< / > 1.93< / >< / > YumChina< / > YUMC< / > 42.48< / > -0.08< / >< / > ZTO Express< / > ZTO< / > 20.45< / > 0.30< / >< / > ZebraTech< / > ZBRA< / > 388.12< / > 0.94< / >< / > ZimmerBiomet< / > ZBH< / > 92.17< / > 3.03< / >< / > ZionsBancorp< / > ZION< / > 62.68< / > 0.19< / >< / > Zoetis< / > ZTS< / > 75.65< / > 0.84< / >< / > ZoomComms< / > ZM< / > 97.94< / > 0.20< / >< / > Zscaler< / > ZS< / > 225.78< / > -7.95< / > |

[...OMITTED...] KeyTronic< / > KTCC< / > 2.04< / > -2.8< / >< / > KeyCorpPtfD< / > KEYpJ< / > 18.56< / > -1.5< / >< / > KeyCorpPtfDg< / > KEYpK< / > 18.50< / > -1.5< / >< / > Knightscope< / > KSCP< / > 0.59< / > -2.4< / >< / > KoreaElecPwr< / > KEP< / > 10.58< / > -3.9< / >< / > KustomEnt< / > KUST< / > 7.35< / > -2.0< / >< / > Linde< / > LCN< / > 77.50< / > -1.4< / >< / > LG [...OMITTED...] LSTA< / > 0.98< / > -0.9< / >< / > LithiumAmericas< / > LAC< / > 2.22< / > -4.3< / >< / > IoanDepot< / > LDI< / > 0.56< / > 3.6< / >< / > LotusTech< / > LOT< / > 3.62< / > -6.7< / >< / > LogitechIntl< / > LOGI< / > 1.43< / > -6.3< / >< / > LuckyStrike< / > LUCK< / > 4.87< / > 3.0< / >< / > LumenTech< / > LUMN< / > 4.99< / > -4.4< / >< / > Lyntris< / > LYNX< / > 11.20< / > -1.4< / >< / > M&T Bank Pfd K< / > MTBpk< / > 21.39< / > -0.7< / >< / > MFA Financial< / > MFA< / > 6.65< / > -2.9< / >< / > MGM Resorts< / > MGAM< / > 28.72< / > 0.2< / >< / > MidwellTechWt< / > MIDWW< / > 0.01< / > -24.1< / > |

续见 B9 页

大宗商品

---

期货合约

数据说明:

政策利率

最大 100 只交易所交易基金,最新交易时段。

金属与石油期货 | 合约< / >< rowspan="2">结算价< / >< rowspan="2">涨跌< / >< rowspan="2">持仓量< / > | 开盘价< / > 最高价< / > 最高 / 最低< / >< / > | 铜-高纯 (CMX)-25,000 磅;美元 / 磅< / >< / > 10月< / > 6.6895< / > 6.7255< / > < / > 6.6985< / > 0.0560< / > 1,627< / >< / > 12月< / > 6.7120< / > 6.7830< / > < / > 6.7470< / > 0.0550< / > 160,642< / >< / > | 黄金 (CMX)-100 金衡盎司;美元 / 金衡盎司< / >< / > 10月< / > 4176.60< / > 4194.60< / > < / > 4165.80< / > -25.20< / > 223< / >< / > 11月< / > 4205.70< / > 4227.20< / > < / > 4175.60< / > -25.50< / > 3,993< / >< / > 12月< / > 4220.80< / > 4242.30< / > < / > 4178.10< / > -25.70< / > 319,173< / >< / > 27年1月< / > 4232.30< / > 4260.40< / > < / > 4199.70< / > -25.90< / > 642< / >< / > 2月< / > 4252.40< / > 4276.30< / > < / > 4225.60< / > -25.90< / > 42,757< / >< / > 3月< / > 4286.30< / > 4288.20< / > < / > 4242.20< / > -25.80< / > 269< / >< / > | 钯金 (NYM) - 50 金衡盎司;美元 / 金衡盎司< / >< / > 10月< / > 1215.00< / > < / > 1136.10< / > -4.40< / > < / >< / > 12月< / > 1151.00< / > 1166.00< / > < / > 1145.80< / > -4.60< / > 21,680< / >< / > | 铂金 (NYM)-50 金衡盎司;美元 / 金衡盎司< / >< / > 10月< / > 1693.50< / > 1693.80< / > < / > 1679.40< / > 0.10< / > 16< / >< / > 27年1月< / > 1696.00< / > 1716.30< / > < / > 1693.50< / > 0.20< / > 52,816< / >< / > | 白银 (CMX)-5,000 金衡盎司;美元 / 金衡盎司< / >< / > 10月< / > 60.755< / > < / > 60.141< / > -0.529< / > 370< / >< / > 12月< / > 61.290< / > 61.745< / > < / > 60.513< / > -0.535< / > 82,502< / >< / > | 原油,轻质甜油 (NYM)-1,000 桶;美元 / 桶< / >< / > 11月< / > 91.83< / > 94.36< / > < / > 93.74< / > 1.89< / > 171,665< / >< / > 12月< / > 90.98< / > 93.43< / > < / > 92.86< / > 1.85< / > 267,219< / >< / > 27年1月< / > 89.99< / > 92.37▲< / > < / > 91.86< / > 1.86< / > 128,840< / >< / > 6月< / > 84.03< / > 85.98▲< / > < / > 85.81< / > 1.86< / > 128,675< / >< / > 12月< / > 77.38< / > 78.84▲< / > < / > 78.72< / > 1.33< / > 180,252< / >< / > 28年12月< / > 71.27< / > 72.01< / > < / > 71.69< / > 0.62< / > 113,386< / >< / > | 纽约港超低硫柴油 ULSD (NYM)-42,000 加仑;美元 / 加仑< / >< / > 11月< / > 4.6742< / > 4.7814< / > < / > 4.7232< / > -.0152< / > 56,484< / >< / > 12月< / > 4.5292< / > 4.6376< / > < / > 4.5868< / > -.0016< / > 52,299< / >< / > | 汽油-纽约 RBOB (NYM)-42,000 加仑;美元 / 加仑< / >< / > 11月< / > 3.2657< / > 3.3343< / > < / > 3.2917< / > -.0035< / > 87,763< / >< / > 12月< / > 3.1350< / > 3.2029< / > < / > 3.1706< / > .0172< / > 73,589< / >< / > | 天然气 (NYM)-10,000 MMBtu;美元

MMBtu. | 11月< / > 3.170< / > 3.204< / > < / > 3.167< / > -.053< / > 263,052< / >< / > 12月< / > 3.506< / > 3.536< / > < / > 3.506< / > -.040< / > 222,770< / >< / > 27年1月< / > 3.939< / > 3.969< / > < / > 3.932< / > -.040< / > 206,458< / >< / > 2月< / > 3.543< / > 3.569< / > < / > 3.553< / > -.021< / > 113,384< / >< / > 3月< / > 2.755< / > 2.792< / > < / > 2.788< / > .008< / > 219,735< / >< / > 4月< / > 2.651< / > 2.687< / > < / > 2.685< / > .012< / > 151,222< / > |

农业期货

< rowspan="2">< / >< rowspan="2">开盘价< / > | 合约< / >< ="2">最低价< / >< ="2">结算价< / >< ="2">涨跌< / >< ="2">持仓量< / >< / > 最高价< / > 高低< / >< / > | 粗米 (CBT)-2,000 cwt;美元 / cwt< / >< / > 11月< / > 16.94< / > 17.07▲< / > < / > 16.52< / > 16.96< / > .02< / > 11,243< / >< / > 27年1月< / > 17.10< / > 17.50▲< / > < / > 17.10< / > 17.40< / > .01< / > 2,588< / >< / > | 小麦 (CBT)-5,000 bu;美分 / bu< / >< / > 12月< / > 669.75< / > 676.00< / > < / > 662.00< / > 672.25< / > 1.25< / > 252,568< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 684.50< / > 689.50< / > < / > 676.50< / > 686.00< / > .75< / > 120,762< / >< / > | 小麦 (KC)-5,000 bu;美分

bu< / >< / > 12月< / > 717.00< / > 723.50< / > < / > 710.50< / > 715.25< / > -4.00< / > 155,928< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 730.00< / > 735.50< / > < / > 723.50< / > 728.00< / > -3.75< / > 77,214< / >< / > | 肥牛 (CME)-50,000 lbs.;美分 / lb.< / >< / > 10月< / > 343.975< / > 344.025< / > < / > 341.550< / > 343.475< / > -.375< / > 6,308< / >< / > 11月< / > 341.500< / > 341.950< / > < / > 339.125< / > 341.100< / > -.850< / > 21,614< / >< / > | 活牛 (CME)-40,000 lbs.;美分

lb.< / >< / > 10月< / > 225.100< / > < / > 223.550< / > 224.750< / > -.225< / > 12,948< / >< / > 12月< / > 227.075< / > 227.400< / > < / > 225.500< / > 226.600< / > -.450< / > 118,229< / >< / > | 精瘦猪 (CME)-40,000 lbs.;美分 / lb.< / >< / > 10月< / > 75.625< / > 75.675< / > < / > 75.075< / > 75.600< / > .550< / > 16,443< / >< / > 12月< / > 68.100< / > 69.000< / > < / > 67.825< / > 68.375< / > .550< / > 150,055< / >< / > | 木材 (CME)-27,500 bd. ft.;美元 / 1,000 bd. ft.< / >< / > 11月< / > 537.00< / > 542.50< / > < / > 537.00< / > 539.50< / > 6.50< / > 8,780< / >< / > 27年1月< / > 552.00< / > 557.00< / > < / > 552.00< / > 555.50< / > 5.00< / > 2,015< / >< / > | 牛奶 (CME)-200,000 lbs.;美分 / lb.< / >< / > 10月< / > 14.97< / > 15.03< / > < / > 14.91< / > 14.96< / > -.02< / > 5,121< / >< / > 11月< / > 16.07< / > 16.12< / > < / > 15.80< / > 16.07< / > -.03< / > 7,872< / >< / > | 可可 (ICE-US)-10公吨;美元 / 吨< / >< / > 12月< / > 5,700< / > 5,801< / > < / > 5,554< / > 5,676< / > 11< / > 69,092< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 5,819< / > 5,915< / > < / > 5,679< / > 5,801< / > 20< / > 46,848< / >< / > | 咖啡 (ICE-US)-37,500 lbs.;美分

lb. | 12月< / > 287.50< / > 290.95< / > < / > 283.50< / > 290.60< / > 3.65< / > 76,316< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 279.30< / > 283.85< / > < / > 276.45< / > 283.50< / > 3.70< / > 47,432< / >< / > | 白糖-世界 (ICE-US)-112,000 磅;每磅美分< / >< / > 3月< / > 20.25< / > 20.89< / > < / > 20.00< / > 20.85< / > .60< / > 639,605< / >< / > 5月< / > 19.47< / > 20.03< / > < / > 19.26< / > 20.00< / > .53< / > 186,137< / >< / > | 白糖-国内 (ICE-US)-112,000 磅;每磅美分< / >< / > 1月< / > 41.95< / > < / > 41.95< / > -.05< / > 1,580< / >< / > 3月< / > 42.00< / > 42.00▲< / > < / > 42.00< / > ...< / > 1,760< / >< / > | 棉花 (ICE-US)-50,000 磅;每磅美分< / >< / > 12月< / > 80.58< / > 80.97< / > < / > 79.38< / > 80.60< / > .06< / > 170,443< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 83.59< / > 84.10< / > < / > 82.61< / > 83.81< / > .22< / > 92,475< / >< / > | 橙汁 (ICE-US)-15,000 磅;每磅美分< / >< / > 11月< / > 149.40< / > 152.35< / > < / > 146.45< / > 151.40< / > 2.70< / > 6,253< / >< / > 27年1月< / > 151.45< / > 155.30< / > < / > 150.20< / > 154.60< / > 3.20< / > 2,903< / > |

利率期货

| 玉米 (CBT)-5,000 蒲式耳;每蒲式耳美分< / >< / > 12月< / > 480.00< / > 484.25< / > 476.00< / > 483.00< / > 3.25< / > 866,535< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 494.50< / > 498.00< / > 490.25< / > 497.25< / > 3.00< / > 435,516< / >< / > | 燕麦 (CBT)-5,000 蒲式耳;每蒲式耳美分< / >< / > 12月< / > 419.50< / > 419.75< / > 407.25< / > 410.25< / > -10.50< / > 3,563< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 424.50< / > 414.50< / > 417.75< / > -6.75< / > 449< / >< / > | 大豆 (CBT)-5,000 蒲式耳;每蒲式耳美分

< / >< / > 11月< / > 1289.00< / > 1291.00< / > 1278.00< / > 1287.75< / > -4.25< / > 350,258< / >< / > 27年1月< / > 1305.75< / > 1307.75< / > 1295.25< / > 1304.75< / > -4.00< / > 246,303< / >< / > | 豆粕 (CBT)-100 吨;每吨美元< / >< / > 10月< / > 373.50< / > 375.30< / > 373.20< / > 375.60< / > 6.90< / > 221< / >< / > 12月< / > 364.60< / > 369.10< / > 360.00< / > 368.70< / > 3.10< / > 278,672< / >< / > | 大豆油 (CBT)-60,000 磅;每磅美分< / >< / > 10月< / > 67.85< / > 67.88< / > 67.73< / > 68.30< / > .58< / > 95< / >< / > 12月< / > 68.03< / > 68.70< / > 67.43< / > 68.63< / > .61< / > 225,315< / > | 超长期国债 (CBT) - $100,000;100% 的 32 分之 1 点数< / >< / > 12月< / > 104-080< / > 104-190< / > 104-000< / > 104-080< / > ... 2,403,262< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 103-160< / > 104-010< / > ... 61< / >< / > | 国债 (CBT) - $100,000;100% 的 32 分之 1 点数< / >< / > 12月< / > 103-070< / > 103-150< / > 102-290< / > 103-050< / > 1.0 1,869,513< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 102-220< / > 102-310< / > 102-200< / > 102-230< / > 1.0 2,703< / >< / > | 国库券 (CBT) - $100,000;100% 的 32 分之 1 点数< / >< / > 12月< / > 104-190< / > 104-230< / > 104-140< / > 104-180< / > -1.0 5,814,620< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 104-085< / > 104-110< / > 104-070< / > 104-105< / > -1.0

4,997 | 5年期国债 (CBT) - $100,000; 点数 100% 的 32 分之一< / >< / > 12月< / > 103-192< / > 103-212< / > 103-155< / > 103-180< / > -1.0 6,818,818< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 103-132< / > 103-110< / > -1.2 3,407< / >< / > | 2年期国债 (CBT) - $200,000; 点数 100% 的 32 分之一< / >< / > 12月< / > 101-267< / > 101-275< / > 101-252< / > 101-256< / > -1.1 4,510,880< / > |

2026年10月12日,星期一

---

交易所交易基金组合 / wsj.com / market-data / mutualfunds-etfs

ETF | 代码< / > 收盘价< / > 涨跌 (%)< / > 年初至今 (%)< / > | SSSPDRS&P500V< / > SPYV< / > 62.65< / > 0.40< / > 10.3< / >< / > SSIMSPDRS&P500< / > SPY< / > 778.10< / > -0.06< / > 14.1< / >< / > SSTechSel< / > XLK< / > 196.36< / > -1.22< / > 36.4< / >< / > VanEckSemicon< / > SMH< / > 590.99< / > -2.05< / > 64.1< / >< / > VangdDivApp< / > VIG< / > 240.04< / > 0.41< / > 9.2< / >< / > VangdExtMkt< / > VXF< / > 233.52< / > -0.63< / > 11.7< / >< / > VangdFTSEAWxUS< / > VEU< / > 82.49< / > -0.40< / > 12.1< / >< / > VangdFTSEDevMk< / > VEA< / > 69.95< / > -0.57< / > 12.0< / >< / > VangdFTSE EM< / > VWO< / > 59.73< / > -0.05< / > 11.1< / >< / > VangdFTSE< / >< / > VangdMstarSCVal< / > VBR< / > 234.71< / > 0.12< / > 10.8< / >< / > VangdMstarTot< / > VTI< / > 381.57< / > -0.10< / > 13.8< / >< / > VangdMstarVal< / > VTV< / > 221.43< / > 0.38< / > 15.9< / >< / > VangdRealEst< / > VNQ< / > 91.36< / > 0.78< / > 3.2< / >< / > VangdRuss1000Grw< / > VONG< / > 130.89< / > -0.61< / > 7.5< / >< / > VangdS&;P500ETF< / > VOO< / > 715.13< / > -0.06< / > 14.0< / >< / > VangdS&;P500 Grw< / > VOOG< / > 86.92< / > -0.42< / > 17.3< / >< / > VangdST Bond< / > BSV< / > 76.39< / > 0.01< / > -3.1< / >< / > VangdSTCpBd< / > VCSH< / > 77.36< / > 0.08< / > -3.0< / >< / > VangdShortTrea< / > VGSH< / > 57.55< / > -0.03< / > -2.0< / >< / > VangdTaxExemptBd< / > VTEB< / > 47.38< / > 0.13< / > -5.8< / >< / > VangdTotalBd< / > BND< / > 70.25< / > 0.04< / > -5.2< / >< / > VangdTotIntlBd< / > BNDX< / > 46.97< / > -0.02< / > -2.8< / >< / > VangdTotIntlStk< / > VXUS< / > 84.44< / > -0.45< / > 11.9< / >< / > VangdTotWrldStk< / > VT< / > 159.50< / > -0.21< / > 13.1< / > |

18< / > < / > 0.35< / > 7.5< / >< / > iShCoreMSCIEM< / > IEMG< / > 80.63< / > -0.95< / > 19.9< / >< / > iShMSCIIntlDev< / > IDEV< / > 89.01< / > -0.22< / > 7.9< / >< / > iShCoreMSCITotInt< / > IXUS< / > 94.57< / > -0.44< / > 11.7< / >< / > iShCoreS&;P500< / > IVV< / > 781.44< / > -0.07< / > 14.1< / >< / > iShCoreS&;P MC< / > IJH< / > 73.16< / > -0.37< / > 10.8< / >< / > &;P SC< / > IJR< / > 137.47< / > -0.06< / > 14.4< / >< / > &;P TotUS< / > ITOT< / > 169.43< / > -0.14< / > 13.9< / >< / > &;PUSGrw< / > IUSG< / > 196.99< / > -0.43< / > 17.3< / >< / > iShCoreUSAggBd< / > AGG< / > 94.66< / > 0.07< / > -5.2< / >< / > iShCoreUnivUSDBd< / > IUSB< / > 44.15< / > 0.02< / > -5.1< / >< / > iShEdgeMSCIUSAQual< / > QUAL< / > 227.72< / > 0.26< / > 14.7< / >< / > iShGoldTr< / > IAU< / > 78.34< / > -0.67< / > -3.5< / >< / > iShiBoxx$IGCpBd< / > LQD< / > 102.58< / > 0.17< / > -6.9< / >< / > iShMBS< / > MBB< / > 89.83< / > 0.04< / > -5.7< / >< / > iShMSCIACWI< / > ACWI< / > 160.63< / > -0.17< / > 13.5< / >< / > iShMSCI EAFE< / > EFA< / > 103.05< / > -0.34< / > 7.3< / >< / > iShMSCI< / >< / >

EM | EEM< / > 66.15< / > 0.97< / > 20.9< / > | iShMSCIEAFEValue< / > EFV< / > 78.15< / > 0.05< / > 9.4< / >< / > iShNatlMuniBd< / > MUB< / > 101.16< / > 0.08< / > -5.6< / >< / > iShRussMC< / > IWR< / > 109.47< / > 0.32< / > 13.7< / >< / > iShRuss1000< / > IWB< / > 424.93< / > 0.09< / > 13.8< / >< / > iShRuss1000Grw< / > IWF< / > 127.13< / > 0.61< / > 7.4< / > |

GOVT< / > 21.88< / > 0.02< / > -5.0< / >< / > iSho-3MTreaBd< / > SGOV< / > 100.52< / > 0.01< / > 0.1< / >< / > JPMNasdEqPrem< / > JEPQ< / > 60.93< / > 0.26< / > 4.8< / >< / > JanusAAACLO< / > JAAA< / > 50.55< / > 0.04< / > -0.1< / >< / > JPMEqPremiumIncome< / > JEPI< / > 56.96< / > 0.33< / > -0.5< / >< / > JPM UltShIncm< / > JPST< / > 50.29< / > 0.02< / > -0.6< / >< / > ProShUltPrQQQ< / > TQQQ< / > 79.61< / > 2.05< / > 51.0< / >< / > SPDRGoldMini< / > GLDM< / > 82.47< / > 0.63< / > -3.4< / >< / > SPDR

Gold< / > GLD< / > 382.15< / > 0.63< / > -3.6< / >< / > SchwabFdUSLgCo< / > FNDX< / > 32.29< / > 0.40< / > 18.7< / >< / > SchwabIntEquity< / > SCHF< / > 27.13< / > 0.51< / > 12.9< / >< / > SchwabUS BrdMkt< / > SCHB< / > 29.88< / > 0.10< / > 13.9< / >< / > SchwabUS Div< / > SCHD< / > 33.26< / > 0.67< / > 21.3< / >< / > SchwabUS LC< / > SCHX< / > 30.63< / > 0.03< / > 13.8< / >< / > SchwabUS LC

Grw< / > SCHG< / > 36.59< / > 0.41< / > 12.2< / >< / > SSEnergySel< / > XLE< / > 66.01< / > 1.43< / > 47.6< / >< / > SSFinlSel< / > XLF< / > 55.05< / > 0.58< / > 0.5< / >< / > SSHlthCrSel< / > XLV< / > 171.99< / > 0.69< / > 11.1< / >< / > SSlndlSel< / > XLI< / > 169.15< / > 0.06< / > 9.0< / >< / > SSSPDRBbg1-3M< / > BIL< / > 91.50< / > 0.01< / > 0.1< / >< / > SS SPDR DJIA< / > DIA< / > 517.91< / > 0.35< / > 7.8< / >< / > SSSPDRDevxUS< / > SPDW< / > 49.69< / > 0.58< / > 11.9< / >< / > SSSPDRS&P500< / > SPYM< / > 91.58< / > 0.07< / > 14.2< / >< / > SSSPDRS&P500G< / > SPYG< / > 125.19< / > 0.45< / > 17.3< / > |

2026年10月12日,星期一

---

现货价格 / wsj.com / market-data / commodities

这些价格反映了市场上各种实际或“实物”商品的买卖情况——与交易所的期货价格不同,后者反映的是该商品在未来几个月可能具有的价值。

能源 | 煤炭,C.Aplc.,12500Btu,1.2SO2-r,w< / > 84.500< / >< / > 煤炭,PwdrRvrBsn,8800Btu,0.8SO2-r,w< / > 14.650< / > |

金属

| 电池 / 电动汽车金属< / >< / > BMI 碳酸锂, EXW 中国, =99.5%-v,w< / > 18450< / >< / > BMI 氢氧化锂, EXW 中国, =56.5%-v,w< / > 17250< / >< / > 硫酸钴, EXW 中国, >20.5%-v,w< / > 8642< / >< / > 硫酸镍, EXW 中国, >22%-v,k< / > 4172< / >< / > 片状石墨, FOB 中国, -100 Mesh, 94-95%-v,m< / > 415< / > | 黄金,每金衡盎司< / >< / > Engelhard 工业级< / > 4167.00< / >< / > 克鲁格金币,批发-e< / > n.a.< / >< / > 枫叶金币-e< / > n.a.< / >< / > 美国鹰金币-e< / > n.a.< / >< / > 墨西哥比索金币-e< / > n.a.< / >< / > 奥地利克朗金币-e< / > n.a.< / >< / > 奥地利爱乐金币-e< / > n.a.< / >< / > | 白银,金衡盎司< / >< / > Engelhard 工业级< / > 60.5500< / >< / > Handy & Harman 基础级< / > n.a.< / >< / > Handy & Harman 加工级< / > n.a.< / >< / > 银币,批发面值 $1,000-a< / > 42990< / >< / > | 其他金属< / >< / > 铂金,Engelhard 工业级< / > 1699.0< / >< / > 钯金,Engelhard 工业级< / > 1161.0< / >< / > 铝, LME, 每公吨美元< / > *3055.5< / >< / > 铜,Comex 现货< / > 6.6985< / >< / > 铁矿石, 62% Fe CFR 中国-s< / > *90.3< / >< / > 钢材, HRC 美国, FOB 中西部工厂-s< / > *1260.0< / > |

纤维与纺织品

黄麻布,10-oz,40-inch NY yd-n,w< / > 1.2375< / >< / > 棉花,11 / 16 std lw-mdMphs-u< / > 0.7835< / >< / > Cotlook 'A' 指数-t< / > *90.65< / >< / > 皮革,hvy native steers piece fob-u< / > n.a.< / >< / > 羊毛,64s,staple,Terr del-u,w< / > n.a.< / > | 牛肉,胴体等效指数< / >< / > choice 1-3,600-900 lbs.-u< / > 344.60< / >< / > select 1-3,600-900 lbs.-u< / > 323.62< / >< / > 肉鸡, 全国综合加权平均-u,w< / > 1.1674< / >< / > 黄油, AA 芝加哥-d< / > 1.2700< / >< / > 切达奶酪, bbl, 芝加哥-d< / > 145.25< / >< / > 切达奶酪, blk, 芝加哥-d< / > 139.00< / >< / > 牛奶, 脱脂干奶粉, 芝加哥 lb.-d< / > 227.00< / >< / > 咖啡, 巴西, 综合-y< / > 2.8816< / >< / > 咖啡, 哥伦比亚, 纽约-y< / > 3.5074< / >< / > 鸡蛋, 大号白色, 芝加哥-u,w< / > 0.6350< / >< / > 面粉, 硬冬麦 KC-p< / > 18.00< / >< / > 火腿, 17-20 lbs, 美国中部 fob-u< / > 0.78< / >< / > 生猪, 艾奥瓦-南明尼苏达-u< / > 77.29< / >< / > 猪五花, 12-14 lb 美国中部-u< / > 1.1526< / >< / > 猪里脊, 13-19 lb 美国中部-u< / > 1.1196< / >< / > 小牛, 德州-俄克拉荷马 Choice-u< / > n.a.< / >< / > 小牛, 育肥, 俄克拉荷马城-u,w< / > 374.25< / > |

谷物与饲料

小麦麸皮,堪萨斯城-u,w | 155< / > | 玉米,2号黄色,伊利诺伊州中部-bp,u< / > 4.4800< / >< / > 棉籽粕-u,w< / > n.a.< / >< / > 玉米糁饲料,伊利诺伊州中部-u,w< / > n.a.< / >< / > 肉骨粉,50%蛋白质,明尼阿波利斯-u,w< / > 463< / >< / > 燕麦,2号磨粉级,明尼阿波利斯-u< / > 4.0025< / >< / > 大米,长粒精磨,2号 阿肯色州-u,w< / > 34.50< / >< / > 豆粕,伊利诺伊州中部,铁路,每吨48%-u,w< / > 387.60< / >< / > 大豆,1号黄色 伊利诺伊州-bp,u< / > 12.5100< / >< / > 小麦,春小麦14%蛋白质,明尼阿波利斯-u< / > 8.6625< / >< / > 小麦,2号软红,圣路易斯-u< / > 6.5225< / >< / > 小麦-硬质-堪萨斯城 (USDA) 每蒲式耳美元-u< / > 6.8125< / >< / > 小麦,1号软白,俄勒冈州波特兰-u< / > 6.5000< / > |

油脂

脱胶玉米油,原油加权平均-u,w< / > n.a.< / >< / > 油脂,精选白色,芝加哥-h< / > 0.6250< / >< / > 猪油,芝加哥-u< / > n.a.< / >< / > 大豆油,原油;伊利诺伊州中部-u,w< / > 0.7052< / >< / > 牛脂,漂白;芝加哥-h< / > 0.7050< / >< / > 牛脂,食用,芝加哥-u< / > n.a.< / > |

代码说明:A=卖价;B=买价;BP=国家电梯对生产者的买价;C=已修正;D=CME;E=Manfra, Tordella & Brookes;H=美国商品经纪公司 (American Commodities Brokerage Co);K=每两周;M=每月;N=名义;n.a.=未报价或不可用;P=Sosland Publishing;R=SNL Energy;S=Platts-TSI;T=Cotlook Limited;U=USDA;V=基准矿业情报 (Benchmark Mineral Intelligence);W=每周;Y=国际咖啡组织;Z=未报价。$^{a}$ 数据截至 10 / 9

来源:道琼斯市场数据

---

借贷基准 / wsj.com / market-data / bonds / benchmarks

---

货币利率

2026年10月12日

美国及国际市场借贷资金的主要年度利率。以下利率仅作为一般水平的参考,并不总是代表实际交易。

通货膨胀

美国消费者价格指数 | 所有项目< / > 334.980< / > 0.32< / > 3.4< / >< / > 核心< / > 338.041< / > 0.27< / > 2.4< / > |

< / > 最新< / > 一周前< / > -52周-高点< / > 低点< / >< / > 低点< / > n.a.< / > 3.8000< / > 4.0800< / > 3.5500< / >< / > 买入价< / > n.a.< / > 3.8800< / > 4.1000< / > 3.6100< / >< / > 卖出价< / > n.a.< / > 3.8900< / > 4.1200< / > 3.6300< / >< / >

< / > 最新< / > 一周前< / > —52周—高点< / > 低点< / >< / >

国库券拍卖

国际利率

4周< / > 3.980< / > 3.890< / > 4.030< / > 3.550< / >< / > 13周< / > 4.050< / > 4.110< / > 3.540< / >< / > 26周< / > 4.165< / > 4.285< / > 3.475< / >< / >

| 担保隔夜融资利率< / >< / > < / > 3.87< / > 3.88< / > 4.31< / >< / > < / > 最新< / > 交易额< / > -52周-高点< / >< / >

< / > 最新< / > 一周前< / > -52周-高点< / > 低点< / >< / > | 最优惠利率< / >< / > 美国< / > 7.00< / > 7.25< / > 6.75< / >< / > 加拿大< / > 4.45< / > 4.70< / > 4.45< / >< / > 日本< / > 2.375< / > 1.875< / >< / >

DTCC GCF 回购指数

其他短期利率

国债< / > n.a.< / > 4.319< / > 3.504< / >< / > MBS< / > n.a.< / > 4.371< / > 3.517< / >< / >

| 政策利率< / >< / > 欧元区< / > 2.65< / > 2.15< / >< / > 瑞士< / > 0.25< / > 0.50< / > 0.25< / >< / > 英国< / > 3.75< / > 4.00< / > 3.75< / >< / > 澳大利亚< / > 4.60< / > 3.60< / >< / >

每周调查

< / > 9.73< / > 9.79< / > 6.06< / > 5.96< / > | 房地美 (Freddie Mac)< / >< / > | 商业票据 (AA级金融机构)< / > 30年期固定< / > 7.40< / > 7.28< / > 6.30< / >< / > 90天< / > n.a.< / > 4.16< / > 3.57< / > 15年期固定< / > 6.73< / > 6.60< / > 5.53< / >< / >

隔夜回购

| 隔夜回购< / >< / > 美国< / > 3.90< / > 3.91< / > 4.30< / > 3.49< / >< / >

美国政府利率< / >< / > 贴现率< / >< / >

美国最优惠利率是由至少 70% 的美国 10 大银行公布的企业贷款基准利率,自 2026年9月17日 起生效。其他最优惠利率不具有直接可比性;贷款实践因地区而异;贴现率自 2026年9月17日 起生效。担保隔夜融资利率数据截至 2026年10月9日。DTCC GCF 回购指数是证券托管结算公司 (DTCC) 对适用 CUSIP 码隔夜交易的加权平均值。交易额以十亿美元计。联邦基金利率为截至东部时间下午 3:30 的 Tullett Prebon 利率。

| 联邦基金< / >< / > 有效利率< / > n.a.< / > 3.8900< / > 4.1100< / > 3.6300< / >< / > 高点< / > n.a.< / > 3.9500< / > 4.2000< / > 3.7000< / >< / >

2026年10月9日,星期五

公司债券价格反映了包括投资者对经济、行业及公司特定预期在内的多种因素

[...OMITTED...]

---

关键利率

数据因假期延迟。 | 合约< / >< rowspan="2">持仓量< / > | 开盘< / > 最高 / 最低< / > 最低< / > 结算< / > 涨跌< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 101-200< / > -1.1< / > 640< / >< / > | 30天联邦基金利率 (CBT)< / >< / > 10月< / > 96.1175< / > 96.1150< / > 96.1175< / > .0025< / > 725,289< / >< / > 11月< / > 96.0750< / > 96.0800< / > 96.0650< / > 96.0700< / > -.0050< / > 547,501< / >< / > | 三个月 SOFR (CME)< / >< / > 7月< / > 96.2600< / > 96.2600▲< / > 96.2600< / > ...< / > 20,743< / >< / > 12月< / > 95.7750< / > 95.7750▼< / > 95.7540< / > 95.7550< / > -.0150< / > 1,605,672< / > |

< rowspan="2">< / > | 合约< / >< rowspan="2">持仓量< / >< / > 开盘< / > 最高< / > 最高 / 最低< / > 最低< / > 结算< / >< / > | 欧元 (CME) -€125,000;美元 / 欧元< / >< / > 10月< / > 1.1203< / > 1.1214< / > ▼< / > 1.1157< / > 1.1159< / > -.0047< / >< / > 12月< / > 1.1217< / > 1.1247< / > ▼< / > 1.1182< / > 1.1185< / > -.0047< / > |

货币期货

| 日元 (CME)-1250万人民币;美元 / 100日元< / >< / > 10月< / > .6324< / > .6328< / > .6303< / > .6306< / > -.0018< / > 813< / >< / > 12月< / > .6350< / > .6358< / > .6331< / > .6334< / > -.0019< / > 370,226< / >< / > | 加拿大元 (CME)-CAD 100,000;美元 / 加拿大元< / >< / > 10月< / > .7014< / > .7015< / > .7008< / > .7003< / > -.0010< / > 415< / >< / > 12月< / > .7031< / > .7045< / > .7021< / > .7022< / > -.0010< / > 370,160< / >< / > | 英镑 (CME)-62,500 英镑; 美元 / 英镑< / >< / > 10月< / > 1.3239< / > 1.3260< / > 1.3229< / > 1.3206< / > -.0035< / > 455< / >< / > 12月< / > 1.3236< / > 1.3265< / > 1.3204< / > 1.3208< / > -.0035< / > 261,000< / >< / > | 瑞士法郎 (CME)-CHF 125,000; 美元 / 瑞士法郎< / >< / > 12月< / > 1.2128< / > 1.2147< / > 1.2066< / > 1.2067< / > -.0074< / > 136,319< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 1.2280< / > 1.2229< / > 1.2203< / > -.0074< / > 421< / >< / > | 澳大利亚元 (CME)-AUD 100,000; 美元 / 澳大利亚元< / >< / > 10月< / > .6975< / > .6958< / > .6957< / > -.0026< / > 313< / >< / > 12月< / > .6974< / > .6989< / > .6948< / > .6950< / > -.0026< / > 323,431< / >< / > | 墨西哥比索 (CME)-MXN 500,000; 美元 / 墨西哥比索< / >< / > 10月< / > .05485< / > .05474< / > .00055< / > 200< / >< / > 12月< / > .05404< / > .05464< / > .05383< / > .05451< / > .00054< / > 283,075< / > |

指数期货

小型道琼斯工业平均指数 (CBT)-$5 x 指数 | < rowspan="2">< / > 12月< / > 51972< / > 52182< / > 51913< / > 52110< / > 184 90,731< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 52459< / > 52648< / > 52400< / > 52589< / > 187 148< / >< / > | 小型标准普尔 500 指数 (CME)-$50 x 指数< / >< / > < rowspan="2">< / > 12月< / > 7873.00< / > 7887.00< / > 7846.25< / > 7858.00< / > -1.75 1,911,164< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 7951.50< / > 7964.25< / > 7925.50< / > 7936.75< / > -1.75 13,724< / >< / > | 小型标准普尔中盘 400 指数 (CME)-$100 x 指数< / >< / > < rowspan="2">< / > 12月< / > 3691.40< / > 3698.90< / > 3671.60< / > 3674.60< / > -12.80 45,211< / >< / > 27年3月< / > ...< / > 3702.90< / > -15.40 n.a.< / >< / > | 小型纳斯达克 100 指数 (CME)-$20 x 指数< / >< / > < rowspan="2">< / > 12月< / > 31145.50< / > 31289.25< / > 30844.25< / > 30898.25< / > -210.50 279,610< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 31500.00< / > 31625.00< / > 31201.50< / > 31254.00< / > -212.25 692< / >< / > | 小型罗素 2000 指数 (CME)-$50 x 指数< / >< / > < rowspan="2">< / > 12月< / > 2822.90< / > 2834.30< / > 2810.40< / > 2812.20< / > -9.90 434,585< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 2858.00< / > 2836.80< / > 2837.20< / > -10.10 1,519< / >< / > | 小型罗素 1000 指数 (CME)-$50 x 指数< / >< / > < / > 12月< / > 4273.50< / > 4274.60< / > 4266.40< / > 4271.30< / > -2.10 7,476< / >< / > | 美元指数 (ICE-US)-$1,000 x 指数< / >< / > < rowspan="2">< / > 12月< / > 102.04< / > 102.40▲< / > 101.90< / > 102.38< / > .35 52,136< / >< / > 27年3月< / > 101.61< / > 102.06▲< / > 101.61< / > 102.09< / > .35 149< / > |

来源:FactSet

---

债券 / wsj.com / market-data / bonds / benchmarks

---

债券基准追踪

不同类型债券的投资回报率、相对于国债的利差和 / 或支付给投资者的收益率,及其与 52 周最高点和最低点的对比

总回报收盘价 | < rowspan="2">年初至今总回报 (%)< / >< rowspan="2">指数< / > | — 收益率 (%) —< / > | 最新< / > 最低< / > 最高< / >< / > | 彭博固定收益指数——广义市场*< / >< / > 2190.52< / > -2.5< / > 美国综合指数< / > 5.510< / > 4.160< / > 5.570< / >< / > | 彭博固定收益指数——美国公司债指数*< / >< / > 3350.76< / > -2.7< / > 美国公司债< / > 5.990< / > 4.680< / > 6.050< / >< / > 3338.99< / > -1.2< / > 中期< / > 5.750< / > 4.330< / > 5.810< / >< / > 4181.33< / > -5.9< / > 长期< / > 6.560< / > 5.370< / > 6.630< / >< / > 618.48< / > -4.1< / > AA级< / > 5.840< / > 4.410< / > 5.900< / >< / > 921.50< / > -2.2< / > BBB级< / > 6.170< / > 4.860< / > 6.220< / >< / > | ICE BofA 高收益债券< / >< / > 619.23< / > < / > 0.3< / > 受限高收益< / > 8.217< / > 6.489< / >< / > 605.41< / > -3.6< / > CCC级< / > 16.676< / > 11.651< / > 16.676< / >< / > 4112.02< / > -0.2< / > 高收益 100< / > 7.529< / > 5.828< / > 7.655< / >< / > 539.74< / > < / > 0.6< / > 全球受限高收益< / > 7.926< / > 6.317< / >< / > 393.73< / > -0.4< / > 欧洲受限高收益< / > 6.572< / > 4.820< / > 6.629< / >< / > | 彭博固定收益指数——美国机构债***< / >< / > 1940.03< / > -0.9< / > 美国机构债< / > 5.180< / > 3.830< / > 5.220< / >< / > 1728.31< / > -0.4< / > 10-20 年< / > 5.120< / > 3.750< / > 5.170< / >< / > 3479.02< / > -6.2< / > 20 年以上< / > 5.870< / > 4.580< / > 5.930< / >< / > 2901.81< / > -1.8< / > 扬基债券< / > 5.650< / > 4.320< / > 5.710< / > |

< rowspan="2">总回报收盘价< / >< rowspan="2">年初至今总回报 (%)< / >< rowspan="2">指数< / > | — 收益率 (%) —< / >< / > 最新< / > 最低< / > 最高< / >< / > | 彭博固定收益指数——抵押贷款支持证券***< / >< / > 2185.64< / > -2.7< / > 抵押贷款支持证券< / > 5.860< / > 4.380< / > 5.970< / >< / > 2146.83< / > -2.5< / > 房利美 (GNMA)< / > 5.920< / > 4.420< / > 6.030< / >< / > 1291.29< / > -2.7< / > 房地美 (FNMA)< / > 5.840< / > 4.370< / > 5.950< / >< / > 1990.82< / > -2.8< / > 联邦住宅贷款银行 (FHLMC)< / > 5.660< / > 4.160< / > 5.810< / >< / > 596.83< / > -3.4< / > 市政债券综合指数< / > 4.391< / > 3.037< / > 4.628< / >< / > 425.43< / > -3.8< / > 7-12 年< / > 4.167< / > 2.596< / > 4.475< / >< / > 474.71< / > -5.0< / > 12-22 年< / > 5.033< / > 3.608< / > 5.157< / >< / > 444.54< / > -4.8< / > 22 年以上< / > 5.454< / > 4.432< / > 5.515< / > |

544.29 | -2.6< / > 全球政府< / > 4.654< / > 3.500< / > 4.694< / > | 841.08< / > -0.1< / > 加拿大< / > 3.848< / > 3.070< / > 3.963< / >< / > 354.85< / > -2.8< / > 欧元区$< / > 4.164< / > 3.117< / > 4.230< / >< / > 627.14< / > -4.7< / > 法国< / > 4.787< / > 3.350< / > 4.823< / >< / > 457.18< / > -1.5< / > 德国< / > 3.554< / > 2.650< / > 3.684< / >< / > 242.44< / > -4.3< / > 日本< / > 3.253< / > 2.120< / > 3.327< / >< / > 498.66< / > -1.6< / > 荷兰< / > 3.660< / > 2.860< / > 3.778< / >< / > 800.06< / > -2.6< / > 英国< / > 5.558< / > 4.560< / > 5.607< / >< / > n.a.< / > n.a.< / > 新兴市场**< / > n.a.< / > 6.403< / > 7.205< / > |

\*受限指数将单个发行人的集中度限制在 2%;高收益 100 指数包含 100 只最大规模的债券 † 本地货币 § 欧元区债券

\*\*EMBI 全球指数。 \*\*\*彭博收益率数据截至 10 / 09 来源:ICE 数据服务;彭博固定收益指数;摩根大通

---

全球政府债券:收益率映射

选定国家基准两年期和十年期政府债券的收益率及其相对于美国国债的利差;箭头表示最新交易日收益率上涨(▲)或下跌(▼)

票面利率 (%) | < rowspan="2">国家 / 期限(年)< / >< ="2">最新(●)< / >< ="2">0< / >< ="2">1< / >< ="2">2< / >< ="2">3< / >< ="2">4< / >< ="2">5< / >< ="2">6< / >< ="2">前值< / >< ="2">一个月前< / >< ="2">一年前< / > | 相对于美国国债的利差(基点)< / > | 最新< / > 前值< / > 一年前< / >< / > 4.750< / > 美国 2< / > 4.789▲< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 4.753< / > 4.425< / > 3.596< / > < / >< / > 4.625< / > 10< / > 5.243▲< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 5.232< / > 4.836< / > 4.146< / > < / >< / > 2.250< / > 澳大利亚

2< / > 4.922▼< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 4.927< / > 5.016< / > 3.548< / > < / > 12.5< / > 13.0< / >< / > 4.250< / > 10< / > 5.330▼< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 5.345< / > 5.379< / > 4.376< / > < / > 9.3< / > 10.8< / >< / > 2.400< / > 法国 2< / > 3.658▲< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 3.632< / > 3.382< / > 2.193< / > < / > -113< / > -116.5< / >< / > 3.700< / > 10< / > 4.905▲< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 4.867< / > 4.451< / > 3.474< / > < / > -33.2< / > -37.0< / >< / > 3.000< / > 德国

2< / > 3.139▲< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 3.116< / > 3.210< / > 1.960< / > < / > -165.8< / > -168.1< / >< / > 3.000< / > 10< / > 3.488▼< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 3.491< / > 3.520< / > 2.646< / > < / > -174.9< / > -174.6< / >< / > 2.650< / > 意大利 2< / > 3.471▲< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 3.444< / > 3.361< / > 2.174< / > < / > -132< / > -135.3< / >< / > 3.800< / > 10< / > 4.576▼< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 4.584< / > 4.354< / > 3.455< / > < / > -66.1< / > -65.4< / >< / > 2.000< / > 日本

2< / > 1.914< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 1.914< / > 1.839< / > 0.925< / > -288.3< / > < / > -288.3< / >< / > 3.100< / > 10< / > 3.016< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 3.016< / > 2.985< / > 1.696< / > < / > -222.1< / >< / > 2.400< / > 西班牙 2< / > 3.270▼< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 3.272< / > 3.244< / > 2.065< / > < / > -152.8< / > -152.5< / >< / > 3.400< / > 10< / > 4.097▼< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 4.112< / > 3.979< / > 3.141< / > < / > -114< / > -112.5< / >< / > 4.375< / > 英国

2< / > 4.774▲< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 4.741< / > 4.699< / > 3.967< / > < / > -2.3< / > -5.6< / >< / > 1.125< / > 10< / > 5.452▲< / > < / > ●< / > < / > 5.444< / > 5.278< / > 4.674< / > < / > 21.5< / > 20.7< / > |

来源:Tullett Prebon, Tradeweb FTSE 美国国债收盘价

---

企业债

收窄幅度最大的投资级利差...

发行人 | < rowspan="2">代码< / >< ="2">票面利率 (%)< / >< ="2">收益率 (%)< / >< ="2">到期日< / > | 利差(基点)< / > | 当前< / > 单日变化< / > 上周< / >< / > 美国银行 (Bank of America)< / > ...< / > 6.000< / > 6.00< / > Oct. 15, '36< / > 75< / > -13< / > 95< / >< / > 佐治亚电力 (Georgia Power)< / > ...< / > 4.300< / > 6.31< / > March 15, '43< / > 65< / > -9< / > 73< / >< / > 澳新银行 (Australia and New Zealand Banking)< / > ...< / > 5.150< / > 5.27< / > Aug. 17, '29< / > 35< / > -6< / > 37< / >< / > 国民西敏市场 (NatWest Markets)< / > ...< / > 4.412< / > 5.65< / > Nov. 6, '30< / > 62< / > -5< / > 60< / >< / > 赫斯 (Hess)< / > ...< / > 5.600< / > 6.12< / > Feb. 15, '41< / > 88< / > -4< / > 96< / >< / > 汇丰控股 (HSBC Holdings)< / > HSBC< / > 6.500< / > 6.42< / > Sept. 15, '37< / > 115< / > -4< / > 124< / >< / > 高盛 (Goldman Sachs)< / > GS< / > 6.250< / > 6.40< / > Feb. 1, '41< / > 114< / > -3< / > 120< / >< / > ING银行 (ING Bank)*< / > ...< / > 4.711< / > 5.58< / > July 7, '31< / > 55< / > -3< / > 60< / > |

...以及扩大幅度最大的利差

威瑞森通信 (Verizon Communications)< / > VZ< / > 4.500< / > 6.04< / > Aug. 10, '33< / > 79< / > 11< / > 71< / >< / > 合作银行 (Cooperatieve Rabobank)< / > ...< / > 5.189< / > 5.31< / > Sept. 25, '29< / > 39< / > 9< / > 31< / >< / > 丰田汽车金融 (Toyota Motor Credit)< / > ...< / > 5.050< / > 5.24< / > May 16, '29< / > 31< / > 9< / > 36< / >< / > 汇丰控股 (HSBC Holdings)< / > HSBC< / > 4.950< / > 5.49< / > March 31, '30< / > 47< / > 7< / > 50< / >< / > 康卡斯特 (Comcast)*< / > CMCSA< / > 4.250< / > 6.12< / > Jan. 15, '33< / > 88< / > 6< / > 88< / >< / > 联合健康 (UnitedHealth)< / > UNH< / > 4.625< / > 5.92< / > July 15, '35< / > 67< / > 6< / > n.a.< / >< / > 康菲石油 (ConocoPhillips)< / > COP< / > 6.500< / > 6.06< / > Feb. 1, '39< / > 82< / > 5< / > 86< / >< / > 约翰迪尔资本 (John Deere Capital)< / > ...< / > 4.400< / > 5.19< / > June 15, '29< / > 25< / > 4< / > n.a.< / > |

价格涨幅最大的高收益债券...

< ="2">发行人< / >< ="2">代码< / >< ="2">票面利率 (%)< / >< ="2">收益率 (%)< / >< ="2">到期日< / > | 债券价格(面值的百分比)< / >< / > 当前< / > 单日变化< / > 上周< / >< / > DISH DBS< / > ...< / > 5.125< / > 9.04< / > June 1, '29< / > 91.000< / > 0.75< / > 90.813< / >< / > Navient*< / > NAVI< / > 5.625< / > 9.21< / > Aug. 1, '33< / > 82.171< / > 0.67< / > 81.250< / >< / > Bath & Body Works< / > BBWI< / > 6.875< / > 7.22< / > Nov. 1, '35< / > 97.750< / > 0.57< / > 96.362< / >< / > 乐天集团 (Rakuten Group)< / > ...< / > 9.750< / > 6.70< / > April 15, '29< / > 106.940< / > 0.55< / > 106.750< / >< / > 赛夫威 (Safeway)< / > ...< / > 7.450< / > 6.16< / > Sept. 15, '27< / > 101.135< / > 0.42< / > n.a.< / >< / > 日产汽车金融 (Nissan Motor Acceptance)< / > ...< / > 5.625< / > 6.75< / > Sept. 29, '28< / > 97.960< / > 0.17< / > 98.125< / >< / > 意大利电信资本 (Telecom Italia Capital)< / > ...< / > 7.721< / > 6.90< / > June 4, '38< / > 106.528< / > 0.12< / > 107.107< / > |

...以及价格跌幅最大的债券

Paramount Global | ...< / > 4.375< / > 10.71< / > 2043年3月15日< / > 51.500< / > -0.50< / > 53.000< / > | Occidental Petroleum< / > OXY< / > 6.450< / > 6.22< / > 2036年9月15日< / > 101.692< / > -0.31< / > 101.743< / >< / > AAvantage Loyalty IP< / > ...< / > 5.750< / > 6.13< / > 2029年4月20日< / > 99.125< / > -0.05< / > 98.969< / > |

\*相对于2年期、3年期、5年期、10年期或30年期热跑美债的估计利差;100个基点=一个百分点;显示的利差变化为Z-利差。注:数据针对到期期限在两年或两年以上的交易最活跃的债券发行品种

来源:MarketAxess

来源:MarketAxess

---

分红变更

关键:A:年度;M:每月;Q:季度;r:修订;SA:半年;S2:1:股票拆分及比例;SO:分拆。

公司 | 代码< / > 收益率%< / > 金额 新 / 旧< / > 频率< / > 支付日 / 记录日< / > | 增加< / >< / > 洛克希德·马丁 (Lockheed Martin)< / > LMT< / > 2.7< / > 3.60 / 3.45< / > $\mathbf{Q}$ < / > 12月31日 / 12月01日< / >< / > | 股票< / >< / > Armlogi Holding< / > BTOC< / > < / > 1:16< / > < / > / 10月15日< / >< / > Biodexa Pharma ADR< / > BDRX< / > < / > 1:8< / > < / > / 10月26日< / >< / > SkinHealth Systems< / > SKIN< / > < / > 1:20< / > < / > / 10月14日< / > |

公司< / > 代码< / > 收益率%< / > 金额 新 / 旧< / > 频率< / > 支付日 / 记录日< / >< / > | 外国< / >< / > 怡安 (Aon)< / > AON< / > 1.2< / > .82< / > $\mathbf{q}$ < / > 11月13日 / 11月02日< / >< / > | 特别< / >< / > Apollo Commercial RE Fin< / > ARI< / > ...< / > 4.10< / > < / > 10月29日 / 10月20日< / >< / > | 注:股息收益率截至东部时间下午 3:30< / > |

22000

7月 8月 9月 10月

< rowspan="2">国家 / 货币< / > | 月份< / >< rowspan="2">美元 vs. 年初至今涨跌(%)< / >< / > 以美元计< / > 每美元< / >< / > 越南盾< / > .00003855< / > 25937< / > -1.4< / >< / > 欧洲< / > < / >< / > 捷克克朗< / > .04577< / > 21.849< / > 6.2< / >< / > 丹麦克朗< / > .1492< / > 6.7012< / > 5.4< / >< / > 欧元区欧元< / > 1.1157< / > .8963< / > 5.3< / >< / > 匈牙利福林< / > .003058< / > 327.02< / > -0.1< / >< / > 冰岛克朗< / > .008191< / > 122.09< / > -2.6< / >< / > 挪威克朗< / > .1044< / > 9.5772< / > -5.0< / >< / > 波兰兹罗提< / > .2544< / > 3.9311< / > 9.5< / >< / > 瑞典克朗< / > .0996< / > 10.0396< / > 9.0< / >< / > 瑞士法郎< / > 1.1980< / > .8347< / > 5.3< / >< / > 土耳其里拉< / > .0203< / > 49.3154< / > 14.8< / >< / > 乌克兰格里夫纳< / > .0222< / > 45.0500< / > 6.4< / >< / > 英镑< / > 1.3209< / > .7571< / > 2.0< / >< / > 中东 / 非洲< / > < / >< / > 巴林第纳尔< / > 2.6484< / > .3776< / > 0.2< / >< / > 埃及镑< / > .0190< / > 52.6491< / > 10.4< / >< / > 以色列谢克尔< / > .3251< / > 3.0758< / > -3.4< / >< / > 科威特第纳尔< / > 3.2112< / > .3114< / > 1.2< / >< / > 阿曼里亚尔< / > 2.5993< / > .3847< / > -0.01< / >< / > 卡塔尔里亚尔< / > .2735< / > 3.657< / > 0.1< / >< / > 沙特阿拉伯里亚尔< / > .2662< / > 3.7563< / > 0.1< / >< / > 南非兰特< / > .0605< / > 16.5347< / > -0.2< / >< / > < / > | 收盘 净变动 %变动 年初至今 %变动< / >< / > WSJ美元指数< / > 97.58< / > 0.20< / > 1.73< / > |

市场摘要

---

道琼斯工业平均指数

< / > 最新< / > 一年前< / >< / > 滚动市盈率< / > 21.11< / > 25.25< / >< / > 市盈率预测*< / > 19.58< / > 22.09< / >< / > 股息收益率< / > 1.54< / > 1.61< / >< / > 历史最高点< / > 54349.12< / > 08 / 05 / 26< / > |

当前除数 0.1682481652835

---

标准普尔 500 指数

[...OMITTED...]

---

股票

49000 | 七月< / > 八月< / > 九月< / > 十月< / >< / > | *周市盈率数据基于 Birinyi Associates Inc 报告的收益;†基于纳斯达克-100指数< / > |

美国主要股市指数

7807.24 ▼4.30, 或 0.06%

过去 3 个月每个交易日的最高价、最低价、开盘价和收盘价。

< / > 最新< / > 一年前< / >< / > 滚动市盈率 *< / > 23.58< / > 25.65< / >< / > 预测市盈率 *< / > 19.56< / > 22.27< / >< / > 股息率 *< / > 1.05< / > 1.15< / >< / > 历史最高点< / > | 7818.93, 10 / 06 / 26< / > |

< rowspan="2">道琼斯< / > | 最新< / > | 52周< / > | % 变化< / >< / > 最高< / > 最低< / > 收盘< / > 净变化< / > % 变化< / > 最高< / > 最低< / > % 变化< / > 年初至今< / > 3年年化< / >< / > 工业平均指数< / > 51928.10< / > 51718.60< / > 51850.55< / > 195.60< / > < / > 54349.12< / > 45166.64< / > 12.6< / > 7.9< / > 15.5< / >< / > 运输平均指数< / > 19848.24< / > 19721.93< / > 19759.08< / > -45.06< / > -0.23< / > 23933.14< / > 15239.93< / > 29.7< / > 13.8< / > 9.7< / >< / > 公用事业平均指数< / > 1061.23< / > 1051.37< / > 1059.66< / > 3.70< / > < / > 1190.23< / > 1004.50< / > -7.6< / > -0.8< / > 9.0< / >< / > 股市总指数< / > 76974.93< / > 76718.46< / > 76807.07< / > -94.68< / > -0.12< / > 77313.23< / > 62750.36< / > 16.6< / > 13.8< / > 21.1< / >< / > 巴伦 400 指数< / > 1610.06< / > 1605.49< / > 1606.03< / > -1.48< / > -0.09< / > 1685.46< / > 1318.70< / > 17.8< / > 13.7< / > 18.7< / > | 纳斯达克股票市场< / >< / > 纳斯达克综合指数< / > 27376.66< / > 27219.42< / > 27245.90< / > -120.27< / > -0.44< / > 27599.79< / > 20794.64< / > 20.1< / > 17.2< / > 26.1< / >< / > 纳斯达克-100指数< / > 30813.96< / > 30618.64< / > 30664.70< / > -218.45< / > -0.71< / > 31224.47< / > 22953.38< / > 23.9< / > 21.4< / > 26.4< / >< / > | 标准普尔 (S&P)< / >< / > 500 指数< / > 7821.67< / > 7796.94< / > 7807.24< / > -4.30< / > -0.06< / > 7818.93< / > 6343.72< / > 17.3< / > 14.0< / > 21.5< / >< / > 中盘 400 指数< / > 3672.02< / > 3654.18< / > 3655.11< / > -14.06< / > -0.38< / > 3926.98< / > 3109.89< / > 13.4< / > 10.6< / > 14.1< / >< / > 小盘 600 指数< / > 1677.01< / > 1669.76< / > 1671.23< / > -1.75< / > -0.10< / > 1828.54< / > 1364.94< / > 17.6< / > 13.9< / > 14.1< / > | 其他指数< / >< / > 罗素 2000 指数< / > 2805.84< / > 2794.47< / > 2794.48< / > -12.50< / > -0.45< / > < / > 3068.42< / > 2305.11< / > 13.5< / > 12.6< / >< / > 纽约证券交易所综合指数< / > 24019.18< / > 23939.10< / > 23990.73< / > 51.63< / > < / > 0.22< / > 24821.68< / > 20912.89< / > 12.2< / > 9.0< / >< / > Value Line 指数< / > 653.43< / > 651.63< / > 651.94< / > -1.390< / > -0.21< / > < / > 702.60< / > 590.50< / > 5.0< / > 3.8< / >< / > NYSE Arca 生物技术指数< / > 9277.61< / > 9169.20< / > 9184.30< / > -51.94< / > -0.56< / > < / > 9539.76< / > 6388.50< / > 43.8< / > 28.4< / >< / > NYSE Arca< / > |

医药 | 1247.56< / > 1240.23< / > 1245.89< / > 4.15< / > < / > 0.33< / > 1315.38< / > 984.85< / > 24.2< / > 10.6< / > | KBW 银行< / > 172.12< / > 170.74< / > 171.41< / > 0.76< / > < / > 0.45< / > 193.91< / > 143.83< / > 17.4< / > 4.4< / >< / > PHLX 黄金 / 白银< / > 365.49< / > 362.48< / > 364.26< / > -2.43< / > -0.66< / > < / > 470.37< / > 265.03< / > 17.7< / > 6.4< / >< / > PHLX 石油服务< / > 95.86< / > 94.00< / > 94.24< / > -0.041< / > -0.04< / > < / > 109.24< / > 61.68< / > 52.0< / > 28.5< / >< / > PHLX 半导体< / > 12378.31< / > 12216.45< / > 12236.79< / > -335.63< / > -2.67< / > < / > 14634.72< / > 6352.07< / > 82.0< / > 72.8< / >< / > Cboe

波动率< / > 15.53< / > 15.11< / > 15.21< / > 0.37< / > < / > 2.49< / > 31.05< / > 13.47< / > -20.1< / > 1.7< / > |

涨幅百分比...

数据来源:FactSet;道琼斯市场数据

数据来源:FactSet;道琼斯市场数据

公司< / > 代码< / > 成交量 (000)< / > 最新价< / > 净变化< / > 盘后涨跌幅 %< / > 最高价< / > 最低价< / >< / > Transocean< / > RIG< / > 12,880.7< / > 5.62< / > 0.02< / > 0.36< / > 5.62< / > 5.58< / >< / > Nu Holdings CI A< / > NU< / > 7,352.7< / > 15.98< / > -0.03< / > -0.18< / > 16.10< / > 15.90< / >< / > Comcast CI A< / > CMCSA< / > 5,496.9< / > 20.69< / > 0.01< / > 0.05< / > 20.75< / > 20.62< / >< / > Indivior Pharmaceuticals< / > INDV< / > 5,401.8< / > 36.06< / > ...< / > 持平< / > 36.06< / >< / > Nokia

ADR< / > NOK< / > 4,843.8< / > 9.90< / > ...< / > 持平< / > 9.92< / > 9.61< / >< / > Snap< / > SNAP< / > 4,361.6< / > 6.59< / > 0.06< / > 0.94< / > 6.63< / > 6.51< / >< / > Amazon.com< / > AMZN< / > 4,276.9< / > 259.60< / > 0.07< / > 0.03< / > 260.05< / > 242.62< / >< / > Centuri Holdings< / > CTRI< / > 4,202.6< / > 20.65< / > ...< / > 持平< / > 20.65< / > 20.25< / > |

涨幅百分比...

| 涨幅百分比< / >< / > Navitas Semiconductor< / > NVTS< / > 3,473.5< / > 10.56< / > 0.57< / > 5.71< / > 11.20< / > 9.99< / >< / > Varonis Systems< / > VRNS< / > 101.3< / > 48.88< / > 2.51< / > 5.40< / > 48.88< / > 46.37< / >< / > Aclaris Therapeutics< / > ACRS< / > 122.7< / > 3.76< / > 0.16< / > 4.44< / > 3.93< / > 3.59< / >< / > Mirion Technologies< / > MIR< / > 94.6< / > 16.97< / > 0.72< / > 4.43< / > 16.97< / > 16.24< / >< / > DHT Holdings< / > DHT< / > 130.4< / > 26.90< / > 0.68< / > 2.59< / > 26.90< / > 26.22< / > |

盘后交易最活跃个股

根据电子交易服务、证券交易商和区域交易所报告,东部时间下午 4 点至 6 点期间,在纽约证券交易所(NYSE)、纽约证券交易所 Arca(NYSE Arca)、纽约证券交易所美股(NYSE Amer.)和纳斯达克(Nasdaq)个股中交易最活跃且波动最大的个股。最低股价为 \$2,最低盘后成交量为 50,000 股。

Syndax Pharmaceuticals< / > SNDX< / > 695.5< / > 13.92< / > -2.63< / > -15.88< / > 16.57< / > 9.00< / >< / > Empery Digital< / > EMPD< / > 60.4< / > 3.17< / > -0.10< / > -3.06< / > 3.27< / > 3.17< / >< / > Reddit< / > RDDT< / > 407.5< / > 156.30< / > -3.63< / > -2.27< / > 159.93< / > 154.34< / >< / > Centene< / > CNC< / > 70.2< / > 65.68< / > -1.34< / > -2.00< / > 67.16< / > 65.04< / >< / > Solaris Energy Infr< / > SEI< / > 608.3< / > 77.70< / > -1.58< / > -1.99< / > 79.45< / > 77.70< / > |

跌幅百分比

亚太地区 | MSCI AC 亚太指数< / > 273.52< / > -1.29< / > -0.47< / > 20.1< / > | 澳大利亚< / > S&P / ASX 200< / > 8783.20< / > 66.56< / > 0.76< / > 0.8< / >< / > 中国< / > 上证综合指数< / > 3797.24< / > -16.55< / > -0.43< / > -4.3< / >< / > 香港< / > 恒生指数< / > 24271.20< / > 59.85< / > 0.25< / > -5.3< / >< / > 印度< / > BSE Sensex< / > 71924.68< / > -547.64< / > -0.76< / > -15.6< / >< / > 印度尼西亚< / > JSX 综合指数< / > 5936.15< / > -157.61< / > -2.59< / > -31.3< / >< / > 日本< / > 日经 225< / > 69030.92< / > ...< / > 休市< / > 37.1< / >< / > 新加坡< / > 海峡时报指数< / > 5415.48< / > 13.59< / > 0.25< / > 16.6< / >< / > 韩国< / > KOSPI< / > 6384.24< / > -241.69< / > -3.65< / > 51.5< / >< / > 台湾< / > TAIEX< / > 49301.96< / > -11.48< / > -0.02< / > 70.2< / >< / > 泰国< / > SET< / > 1571.74< / > -5.91< / > -0.37< / > 24.8< / > |

\* 每股价格在 \$2 或以上的普通股,且 65 个交易日的平均成交量至少为 5,000 股 †交易天数少于 65 天

< / > 最新< / > 一年前< / >< / > 滚动市盈率 *†< / > 31.51< / > 33.55< / >< / > 预计市盈率 *†< / > 22.15< / > 29.15< / >< / > 股息率 *†< / > 0.53< / > 0.64< / >< / > | 历史最高点:27599.79, 10 / 06 / 26< / > |

27245.90 ▼ 120.27, 或 0.44%

过去三个月每个交易日的最高价、最低价、开盘价和收盘价。

---

盘后交易

成交量异动股(按与65日平均值的偏差排名\*)

公司 | < rowspan="2">代码< / > | 最新交易日< / > | 52周< / > | 收盘价< / > 净涨跌< / > % 涨跌< / > 最高价< / > 最低价< / > % 涨跌< / >< / > Bumble CI A< / > BMBL< / > 3.80< / > 1.26< / > 49.61< / > 5.96< / > 2.44< / > -25.0< / >< / > WF Holding< / > WFF< / > 17.28< / > 4.99< / > 40.60< / > 50.60< / > 0.91< / > 287.4< / >< / > Passage Bio< / > PASG< / > 4.55< / > 0.86< / > 23.31< / > 20.00< / > 3.29< / > -46.3< / >< / > Gulf Resources< / > GURE< / > 3.32< / > 0.59< / > 21.61< / > 11.83< / > 2.04< / > -39.4< / >< / > Tradr 2X Sh CBRS Daily< / > CBRZ< / > 14.32< / > 2.52< / > 21.36< / > 37.43< / > 5.68< / > ...< / >< / > Gix Internet< / > GIXI< / > 4.72< / > 0.83< / > 21.34< / > 15.50< / > 3.56< / > ...< / >< / > Picard Medical< / > PMI< / > 11.34< / > 1.86< / > 19.62< / > 684.00< / > 2.65< / > -97.6< / >< / > Tradr 2X Sh LITE Daily< / > LITZ< / > 21.28< / > 3.44< / > 19.28< / > 121.36< / > 16.35< / > ...< / >< / > Defiance Tgt 2x Shrt IONQ< / > IONZ< / > 28.62< / > 4.61< / > 19.20< / > 436.81< / > 17.07< / > -86.0< / >< / > Tradr 2X Sh AXTI Daily< / > AXTQ< / > 33.89< / > 5.33< / > 18.66< / > 67.92< / > 17.90< / > ...< / >< / > XIAO-I ADR< / > AIXI< / > 2.40< / > 0.37< / > 18.23< / > 379.40< / > 1.18< / > -98.4< / >< / > Bitwise NEAR ETF< / > NRR< / > 28.59< / > 4.25< / > 17.46< / > 29.64< / > 22.55< / > ...< / >< / > American Realty Investors< / > ARL< / > 19.25< / > 2.80< / > 17.02< / > 24.44< / > 12.42< / > 26.5< / >< / > Tradr 2X Sh AAOI Daily< / > AAOZ< / > 11.87< / > 1.68< / > 16.49< / > 51.05< / > 6.94< / > ...< / >< / > Greenland Mines< / > GRML< / > 6.02< / > 0.85< / > 16.44< / > 36.99< / > 2.82< / > -79.4< / > |

国际股票指数

< rowspan="2" colspan="2">地区 / 国家 指数< / >< rowspan="2">收盘价< / > | 最新< / >< rowspan="2">年初至今 %涨跌< / >< / > 净涨跌< / > % 涨跌< / >< / > < rowspan="4">全球< / > MSCI ACWI< / > 1146.50< / > -0.76< / > -0.07 / < / > 13.0< / >< / > MSCI ACWI ex-USA< / > 468.23< / > -0.32< / > -0.07 / < / > 11.2< / >< / > World< / > 4963.27< / > 0.86< / > 0.02< / > 12.0< / >< / > Emerging Markets< / > 1697.03< / > -11.74< / > -0.69 / < / > 20.8< / >< / > 美洲< / > AC Americas< / > 2953.27< / > -1.686< / > -0.06 / < / > 13.9< / >< / > 加拿大< / > S&P / TSX Comp< / > 35664.62< / > ...< / > 休市< / > 12.5< / >< / > 拉美< / > EM Latin America< / > 3384.14< / > 11.22< / > 0.33< / > 24.9< / >< / > 巴西< / > Bovespa< / > 209066.90< / > ...< / > 休市< / > 29.8< / >< / > 墨西哥< / > S&P / BMV IPC< / > 66746.78< / > 698.21< / > 1.06< / > 3.8< / >< / > 欧洲、中东及非洲< / > STOXX Europe 600< / > 635.65< / > 4.10< / > 0.65< / > 7.3< / >< / > 欧元区< / > Euro STOXX< / > 653.31< / > 3.34< / > 0.51< / > 6.7< / >< / > 比利时< / > Bel-20< / > 5490.22< / > 35.48< / > 0.65< / > 8.1< / >< / > 丹麦< / > OMX Copenhagen 20< / > 1527.08< / > 8.90< / > 0.59< / > -5.0< / >< / > 法国< / > CAC 40< / > 7832.88< / > 29.55< / > 0.38< / > -3.9< / >< / > 德国< / > DAX< / > 25277.68< / > 190.41< / > 0.76< / > 3.2< / >< / > 以色列< / > Tel

特拉维夫 | 4062.11< / > 0.40< / > 0.01< / > 11.9< / > | 意大利< / > FTSE MIB< / > 50035.00< / > 288.69< / > 0.58< / > 11.3< / >< / > 荷兰< / > AEX< / > 1135.49< / > 4.54< / > 0.40< / > 19.4< / >< / > 挪威< / > 奥斯陆交易所全股指数< / > 2485.95< / > 5.47< / > 0.22< / > 28.0< / >< / > 南非< / > 富时 / 约翰内斯堡全股指数< / > 108759.84< / > 235.07< / > 0.22< / > -6.1< / >< / > 西班牙< / > IBEX 35< / > 19285.80< / > 252.70< / > 1.33< / > 11.4< / >< / > 瑞典< / > OMX 斯德哥尔摩< / > 1124.99< / > 2.88< / > 0.26< / > 7.6< / >< / > 瑞士< / > 瑞士市场指数< / > 13877.84< / > 90.44< / > 0.66< / > 4.6< / >< / > 土耳其< / > BIST

100< / > 12150.67< / > -115.31< / > -0.94 / < / > 7.9< / >< / > 英国< / > 富时 100< / > 10656.28< / > 104.23< / > 0.99< / > 7.3< / >< / > 英国< / > 富时 250< / > 24328.06< / > 114.28< / > 0.47< / > 8.3< / > |

< rowspan="2">公司< / >< rowspan="2">代码< / >< rowspan="2">成交量 (千)< / >< rowspan="2">较65日均值变动%< / > | -最新交易日< / > | 52周< / >< / > 收盘价< / > 变动%< / > 最高价< / > 最低价< / >< / > iSh Curr Hd MSCI Eurozone< / > HEZU< / > 2,551< / > 3516< / > 47.95< / > -0.21< / > 51.68< / > 41.68< / >< / > KPET Ultra Paceline< / > KPET< / > 250< / > 2523< / > 9.99< / > -0.30< / > 10.21< / > 9.91< / >< / > Cantor Equity Partners VI< / > CEPS< / > 203< / > 1991< / > 10.20< / > -0.39< / > 10.45< / > 10.05< / >< / > Range Capital Acqn II< / > RNGT< / > 214< / > 1912< / > 10.20< / > 0.10< / > 10.20< / > 9.90< / >< / > ProShares UltShort

Euro< / > EUO< / > 315< / > 1756< / > 32.65< / > 0.94< / > 32.65< / > 26.93< / >< / > AllianzIM US Eq Bf10 Jan< / > JANT< / > 83< / > 1556< / > 45.75< / > 0.01< / > 45.77< / > 39.23< / >< / > Contineum Therapeutics< / > CTNM< / > 8,444< / > 1516< / > 8.57< / > -35.99< / > 17.79< / > 8.43< / >< / > Drugs Made In America II< / > DMII< / > 859< / > 1210< / > 10.19< / > ...< / > 10.33< / > 9.86< / >< / > MiniMed Group< / > MMED< / > 38,550< / > 1153< / > 18.80< / > -4.62< / > 24.43< / > 10.65< / >< / > Innov Grw100 Pwr Bf Mar< / > NMAR< / > 264< / > 1147< / > 33.32< / > -0.06< / > 33.41< / > 26.78< / > |

---

纳斯达克综合指数

公司 | < rowspan="2">代码< / > | 最新交易日< / > | 52周< / > | 收盘价< / > 净涨跌< / > % 涨跌< / > 最高价< / > 最低价< / > % 涨跌< / >< / > Able View Global< / > ABLV< / > 1.33< / > -1.06< / > -44.35< / > 2.86< / > 0.54< / > 44.4< / >< / > Vivakor< / > VIVK< / > 2.17< / > -1.63< / > -42.89< / > 35760.00< / > 2.14< / > -100.0< / >< / > Contineum Therapeutics< / > CTNM< / > 8.57< / > -4.82< / > -35.99< / > 17.79< / > 8.43< / > -27.9< / >< / > Quetta Acquisition< / > QETA< / > 11.60< / > -4.81< / > -29.31< / > 21.59< / > 11.02< / > 3.8< / >< / > CID HoldCo< / > DAIC< / > 1.70< / > -0.69< / > -28.87< / > 76.25< / > 0.37< / > -97.5< / >< / > AI OKTO< / > AIOK< / > 6.20< / > -2.50< / > -28.73< / > 10.95< / > 5.78< / > ...< / >< / > Bradbury Capital< / > BBCI< / > 5.05< / > -1.86< / > -26.92< / > 15.50< / > 4.90< / > -58.2< / >< / > Masonrylory< / > MSGY< / > 2.70< / > -0.93< / > -25.62< / > 52.80< / > 1.73< / > -78.9< / >< / > Niki BioSolutions< / > NIKI< / > 3.02< / > -0.98< / > -24.50< / > 24.00< / > 3.02< / > -81.8< / >< / > PS International Group< / > PSIG< / > 3.87< / > -1.23< / > -24.12< / > 12.00< / > 1.03< / > 5.6< / >< / > Medicus Pharma< / > MDCX< / > 3.58< / > -1.03< / > -22.26< / > 139.00< / > 3.58< / > -97.1< / >< / > CervoMed< / > CRVO< / > 2.51< / > -0.71< / > -22.05< / > 10.00< / > 2.13< / > -69.2< / >< / > Valion Bio< / > VBIO< / > 1.68< / > -0.46< / > -21.50< / > 76.50< / > 1.59< / > -97.7< / >< / > VisionWave Holdings< / > VWAV< / > 4.52< / > -1.22< / > -21.25< / > 316.00< / > 3.90< / > -97.7< / >< / > Leverage 2X Lg CBRS Dly< / > CBRG< / > 1.78< / > -0.48< / > -21.11< / > 17.15< / > 1.75< / > ...< / > |

大宗商品

货币与大宗商品

交易日记

| 成交量、上涨数、下跌数< / >< / > < / > 纽约证券交易所 (NYSE)< / > 纽约证券交易所美国市场 (NYSE Amer.)< / >< / > 总成交量*1< / > 10.23亿< / > 13,880,554< / >< / > 上涨成交量*< / > 5.48亿< / > 2,491,996< / >< / > 下跌成交量*< / > 4.58亿< / > 11,280,276< / >< / > 交易品种数< / > 2,796< / > 290< / >< / > 上涨数< / > 1,290< / > 84< / >< / > 下跌数< / > 1,434< / > 194< / >< / > 持平数< / > 72< / > 12< / >< / > 新高数< / > 53< / > 2< / >< / > 新低数< / > 166< / > 31< / >< / > 收盘Arms†< / > 0.88< / > 1.40< / >< / > 大宗交易*< / > 3,502< / > 158< / >< / > < / > 纳斯达克 (Nasdaq)< / > 纽约证券交易所Arca (NYSE Arca)< / > |

上涨成交量*< / > 29.59亿< / > 1.07亿< / >< / > 下跌成交量*< / > 36.99亿< / > 1.07亿< / >< / > 交易品种数< / > 4,959< / > 2,538< / >< / > 上涨数< / > 1,854< / > 1,102< / >< / > 下跌数< / > 2,939< / > 1,363< / >< / > 持平数< / > 166< / > 73< / >< / > 新高数< / > 102< / > 65< / >< / > 新低数< / > 402< / > 45< / >< / > 收盘Arms†< / > 0.92< / > 0.72< / >< / > 大宗交易*< / > 30,605< / > 1,084< / > |

最活跃股票

货币

美东时间下午 5 点美元外汇汇率

总成交量\*62.85亿 2.20亿

上涨成交量\*25.37亿 1.07亿

下跌成交量\*36.99亿 1.07亿

\* 仅限主要市场 NYSE、NYSE American 和 NYSE Arca。

†(TRIN) 上涨和下跌股票数量与上涨和下跌股票成交量的比较。Arms 指数低于 1 表示买盘需求;高于 1 表示抛盘压力。

国家 / 货币 | 周一< / >< rowspan="2">美元 vs. 年初至今涨跌幅(%)< / > | 以美元计< / > 每美元兑换< / >< / > | 美洲< / >< / > 阿根廷比索< / > .00071516.7423< / > < / > 4.5< / >< / > 巴西雷亚尔< / > .2005< / > 4.9875< / > -9.6< / >< / > 加拿大元< / > .7001< / > 1.4284< / > 4.1< / >< / > 智利比索< / > .001024< / > 976.87< / > 8.5< / >< / > 哥伦比亚比索< / > .000313< / > 3195.84< / > -15.2< / >< / > 厄瓜多尔美元< / > 1< / > 持平< / >< / > 墨西哥比索< / > .0548< / > 18.2640< / > 1.4< / >< / > 乌拉圭比索< / > .02485< / > 40.2389< / > 3.0< / > |

澳大利亚元< / > .6960< / > 1.4368< / > -4.1< / >< / > 中国元< / > .1494< / > 6.6921< / > -4.3< / >< / > 港币< / > .1274< / > 7.8482< / > 0.8< / >< / > 印度卢比< / > .01045< / > 95.658< / > 6.4< / >< / > 印尼卢比< / > .0000557< / > 17954< / > 7.5< / >< / > 日元< / > .006304< / > 158.63< / > 1.3< / >< / > 哈萨克斯坦坚戈< / > .002217< / > 451.05< / > -11.1< / >< / > 澳门帕塔卡< / > .1237< / > 8.0857< / > 0.8< / >< / > 马来西亚林吉特< / > .2448< / > 4.0852< / > 0.7< / >< / > 新西兰元< / > .5588< / > 1.7895< / > 3.0< / >< / > 巴基斯坦卢比< / > .00361< / > 276.994< / > -1.2< / >< / > 菲律宾比索< / > .0159< / > 62.768< / > 6.5< / >< / > 新加坡元< / > .7809< / > 1.2806< / > -0.4< / >< / > 韩国韩元< / > .0007494< / > 1334.45< / > -7.4< / >< / > 斯里兰卡卢比< / > .0030199< / > 331.14< / > 6.9< / >< / > 台湾元< / > .03130< / > 31.948< / > 1.9< / >< / > 泰国铢< / > .02974< / > 33.620< / > 6.7< / > | 大宗商品< / >< / > < rowspan="2">< / >< rowspan="2">收盘价< / > | 周一< / > | 52周< / > | 年初至今< / >< / > 净变化< / > % 变化< / > 最高< / > 最低< / > % 变化< / >< / > 道琼斯商品指数< / > 1469.55< / > 5.76< / > 0.39< / > 1505.40< / > 1085.89< / > 34.52< / > 29.97< / >< / > 富时 / CC CRB 指数< / > 417.10< / > 2.37< / > 0.57< / > 429.15< / > 291.69< / > 41.13< / > 39.60< / >< / > 原油,美元 / 桶< / > 93.74< / > 1.89< / > 2.06< / > 112.95< / > 55.27< / > 57.57< / > 63.25< / >< / > 天然气,美元 / 百万英热单位< / > 3.167< / > -0.053< / > -1.65< / > 7.460< / > 2.523< / > 1.57< / > -14.08< / >< / > 黄金,美元 / 金衡盎司< / > 4165.80< / > -25.20< / > -0.60< / > 5318.40< / > 3947.70< / > 1.39< / > -3.69< / > |

---

Polymarket / 道琼斯合作伙伴

预测市场:2026年美联储将多少次加息?该市场的结算将根据美联储在2026年实际加息25个基点的次数而定(包括12月会议期间的任何加息)。

| 收盘价< / > 净变化< / > % 变化< / > 年初至今 % 变化< / > | WSJ美元指数< / > 97.58< / > 0.20< / > 0.21< / > 1.73< / > |

来源:Tullett Prebon, 道琼斯市场数据

< rowspan="2">公司< / >< rowspan="2">代码< / >< rowspan="2">成交量(000)< / >< rowspan="2">较65日均值 % 变化< / > | 最新交易日< / > | 52周< / >< / > 收盘价< / > % 变化< / > 最高价< / > 最低价< / >< / > Mobile-health Netwk Solns< / > MNDR< / > 190,893< / > 81406.8< / > 3.04< / > 257.65< / > 32.52< / > 0.76< / >< / > Linkers Industries< / > LNKS< / > 147,962< / > 44875.8< / > 2.27< / > 138.37< / > 420.00< / > 0.76< / >< / > Freight Technologies< / > FRGT< / > 99,668< / > 981.3< / > 0.35< / > 19.17< / > 51.25< / > 0.21< / >< / > OLB Group< / > OLB< / > 95,432< / > 248.6< / > 0.65< / > 32.16< / > 1.80< / > 0.18< / >< / > VCI Global< / > VCIG< / > 93,004< / > 6222.5< / > 0.44< / > -13.64< / > 4140.00< / > 0.36< / >< / > J-Star Holding< / > YMAT< / > 84,712< / > 4629.4< / > 2.91< / > 125.58< / > 13.00< / > 0.85< / >< / > China SXT Pharm< / > SXTC< / > 75,046< / > 1058.1< / > 0.10< / > -31.41< / > 83758.79< / > 0.09< / >< / > Ondas< / > ONDS< / > 74,089< / > -5.4< / > 6.67< / > -0.89< / > 15.28< / > 4.95< / >< / > Intel< / > INTC< / > 72,363< / > -32.1< / > 101.35< / > -3.20< / > 142.35< / > 32.89< / >< / > Euro Tech Holdings< / > CLWT< / > 70,630< / > 289237.8< / > 2.15< / > 58.09< / > 2.68< / > 0.99< / > |

\* 成交量在100,000股或以上的数值四舍五入至最近的千位

---

信贷市场

---

消费者利率与投资者回报 美国消费者利率 精选利率

过去一年消费者利率与其基准的对比

-2.00

10月 11月 12月 1月 2月 3月 4月 5月 6月 7月 8月 9月

2025 2026

Bankrate.com 平均值1: | 1.79%< / > | Bread Savings< / > 4.50%< / >< / > 犹他州德雷珀 (Draper, UT)< / > 833-755-4354< / >< / > BTG Pactual Bank< / > 4.55%< / >< / > 纽约州纽约市 (New York, NY)< / > 212-652-7200< / >< / > Bread Savings< / > 4.60%< / >< / > 犹他州德雷珀 (Draper, UT)< / > 833-755-4354< / >< / > 巴克莱银行 (Barclays Bank)< / > 4.75%< / >< / > 特拉华州威尔明顿 (Wilmington, DE)< / > 888-710-8756< / >< / > Popular Direct< / > 5.00%< / >< / > 佛罗里达州迈阿密湖 (Miami Lakes, FL)< / > 800-274-5696< / > |

< rowspan="2">利率< / > | —收益率 / 利率 (%) —< / > | 52周范围 (%) —< / >< rowspan="2">3年变化(百分点)< / >< / > 最新 (●)< / > 一周前< / > 最低< / > 0< / > 2< / > 4< / > 6< / > 8< / >< / > 联邦基金目标利率< / > 3.75-4.00< / > 3.50< / > < / > 4.25< / > -1.50< / >< / > 最优惠利率*< / > 7.00< / > 6.75< / > < / > 7.25< / > -1.50< / >< / > SOFR< / > 3.87< / > 3.88< / > 3.50< / > < / > 4.31< / > -1.44< / >< / > 货币市场年收益率< / > 0.45< / > 0.41< / > < / > 0.45< / > -0.17< / >< / > 五年期定期存款 (CD) 年收益率< / > 1.79< / > 1.78< / > 1.67< / > < / > 1.79< / > -1.04< / >< / > 30年期固定抵押贷款†< / > 7.49< / > 7.45< / > 6.11< / > < / > 7.50< / > -0.59< / >< / > 15年期固定抵押贷款†< / > 6.93< / > 6.85< / > 5.55< / > < / > 6.93< / > -0.27< / >< / > 巨额抵押贷款,$832,750及以上†< / > 7.53< / > 7.46< / > 6.34< / > < / > 7.53< / > -0.63< / >< / > 五年期可调利率抵押贷款 (ARM)†< / > 6.39< / > 6.66< / > 5.66< / > < / > 6.72< / > -0.40< / >< / > 新车贷款,48个月< / > 7.04< / > 6.94< / > 6.85< / > < / > 7.13< / > -0.44< / > |

数据来源:FactSet;道琼斯市场数据;Bankrate.com

---

国债收益率曲线

国债收益率曲线

当前短期国库券、中期国债和长期国债的到期收益率

月(s)年

—— 到期期限

汇率走势

日元、欧元兑美元;美元兑美国主要贸易伙伴

来源:Tradeweb FTSE U.S. Treasury Close; Tullett Prebon; 道琼斯市场数据

企业借贷利率与收益率

债券总回报指数 | < rowspan="2">收盘价< / > | 收益率 (%)< / > | 52周< / > | 总回报 (%)< / > | 最新< / > 一周前< / > 最高< / > 最低< / > 52周< / > 3年< / >< / > 美国国债 Bloomberg*< / > 2275.650< / > 5.080< / > 5.130< / > 3.750< / > -2.190< / > 3.500< / >< / > 美国长期国债 Bloomberg*< / > 2975.810< / > 5.620< / > 5.690< / > 4.520< / > -8.644< / > 1.930< / >< / > 综合指数, Bloomberg*< / > 2190.520< / > 5.510< / > 5.570< / > 4.160< / > -1.976< / > 4.454< / >< / > 固定利率 MBS, Bloomberg*< / > 2185.640< / > 5.860< / > 5.970< / > 4.380< / > -1.651< / > 5.087< / >< / > 高收益 100, ICE BofA< / > 4112.019< / > 7.529< / > 7.569< / > 7.655< / > 5.828< / > 1.411< / > 7.891< / >< / > 市政债券主指数, ICE BofA< / > 596.828< / > 4.391< / > 4.418< / > 4.628< / > 3.037< / > -2.502< / > 2.646< / >< / > EMBI 全球指数, J.P. Morgan< / > n.a.< / > 7.205< / > 6.403< / > n.a.< / > |

\*Bloomberg 收益率数据截至 10 / 09

来源:J.P. Morgan; Bloomberg Fixed Income Indices; ICE Data Services

Adnoc物流拟收购HEA股份

作者:BEN DUMMETT

据知情人士透露,阿拉伯联合酋长国油气巨头Adnoc的物流部门正洽谈收购HEA Energy的大量股份,该交易将使这家总部位于中东的能源海事服务公司的估值高达30 亿美元 billion。

知情人士表示,此次洽谈涉及阿布扎比国家石油公司的子公司Adnoc Logistics & Services(Adnoc L&S),计划持有HEA的大量少数股权或控股权。

知情人士称,讨论正在推进,但仍有可能无法达成最终交易。

这家由国家支持的能源物流供应商资金充裕。由于伊朗的冲突导致波斯湾受阻,使得将石油运出该地区的成本增加,其航运业务的租金在今年大幅飙升。Adnoc L&S第二季度的净利润从去年同期的水平增长至9.17亿美元,翻了两番。

在阿联酋于今年早些时候脱离石油价格制定组织欧佩克(OPEC)后,Adnoc正寻求提高油气产量。此举使国有的Adnoc在进行旨在提高产量的投资以及确立其作为能源超级大国的地位方面拥有更大的自由度。今年8月,Adnoc的天然气生产部门表示将投资超过80 亿美元 billion以增加产能。

Adnoc L&S支持海上钻井项目,并运营100多艘用于在全球范围内运输原油、液化天然气和精炼产品的船舶。

持有封闭式公司HEA的股份将增强阿联酋在海上油气服务领域的足迹,扩展Adnoc L&S的地理覆盖范围,包括北海和美国。

HEA成立于2022年,总部位于阿布扎比。该公司运营着一个所谓的自升式驳船网络——这些浮动平台用于支持海上风电场以及油气维护活动。

HEA还提供用于安置油气工人的住宿船以及电池驱动的潜水器。

根据该公司网站的数据,HEA在今年前六个月实现了$65.200 万的营业收入,比去年同期增长128%,而营收则翻了一倍多,达到约1亿美元。

尽管面临伊朗的无人机和导弹袭击,阿联酋在将石油运出波斯湾方面一直采取积极行动。Adnoc提供了“穿梭运行”服务,利用油轮将石油从海湾内部运送到霍尔木兹海峡外侧,然后在那里交付给客户。

Adnoc L&S在8月宣布收购11艘船舶(5艘运气船和6艘原油运输船),总额约13 亿美元 billion,从而扩大了其能源运输能力。Adnoc L&S在阿布扎比上市,市值超过150 亿美元 billion。其约80%的股份由其国有母公司Adnoc持有。

新高与新低

---

共同基金

数据由 LSEG 提供

按净资产排列的纳斯达克公布份额类别的前 250 位共同基金列表。e-除权分红。f-前一日报价。g-适用脚注 x 和 s。j-适用脚注 e 和 s。k-由 LSEG 使用更新数据重新计算。p-分销成本,12b-1。r-可能收取赎回费。s-股票拆分或股息。t-脚注 p 和 r。v-脚注 x 和 e。x-除息。z-脚注 x, e 和 s。NA-由于价格、业绩或成本数据不完整而无法提供。NE-LSEG 未发布;数据审核中。NN-未追踪基金。NS-期初该基金不存在。

| 11.8< / > | ICAA< / > 69.11< / > -0.14< / > 11.4< / >< / > IncoA< / > 27.33< / > +0.10< / > 6.6< / >< / > N PerA< / > 75.75< / > -0.02< / > 7.3< / >< / > NEcoA< / > 86.61< / > -0.56< / > 19.2< / >< / > NwWrldA< / > 106.84< / > -0.09< / > 14.5< / >< / > SmCpA< / > 81.23< / > -0.56< / > 10.8< / >< / > WshA< / > 67.68< / > +0.26< / > 8.9< / > |

2026年10月12日,星期一

| 2026年10月12日,星期一< / >< / > < / > 基金< / > 资产净值 (NAV)< / > 净变动 %回报率< / >< / > | Artisan Funds< / >< / > IntVal Inst< / > 58.37< / > +0.07< / > 9.9< / >< / > < ="4">Baird Funds< / >< / > AggBdlnst< / > 9.42< / > ...< / > -2.3< / >< / > CorBdlnst< / > 9.78< / > ...< / > -2.1< / >< / > IntBdlnst< / > 10.14< / > ...< / > -1.1< / >< / > ShtTBDInst< / > 9.38< / > ...< / > 1.0< / >< / > < ="4">BlackRock Funds< / >< / > HiYBlk< / > 6.92< / > ...< / > 0.8< / >< / > HiYtBd Inst< / > 6.92< / > ...< / > 0.9< / >< / > < ="4">BlackRock Funds III< / >< / > < ="4">iHS&P500ldxK907.43-0.43 15.0< / >< / > < ="4">BlackRock Funds

Inst< / >< / > StratIncOpptyIns< / > 9.48< / > ...< / > 0.7< / >< / > < ="4">Calamos Funds< / >< / > MktNeutl< / > 16.29< / > +0.01< / > 4.6< / >< / > < ="4">CausewayInst< / >< / > CausewayInst< / > 24.02< / > +0.10< / > 2.2< / >< / > < ="4">Columbia Class A< / >< / > < ="4">SelgComulnfaA251.60-4.88 60.6< / >< / > < ="4">Columbia Class I< / >< / > DivlIncm I< / > 40.46< / > +0.21< / > 12.9< / > |

基金< / > 资产净值 (NAV)< / > 净变动< / > 年初至今 %回报率< / >< / > < ="4">Dimensional Fds< / >< / > EmgMktVa< / > 44.95< / > -0.13< / > 23.3< / >< / > EmMktCorEq< / > 34.09< / > -0.27< / > 19.3< / >< / > IntlCoreEq< / > NA< / > ...< / > NA< / >< / > IntlVal< / > 31.80< / > +0.01< / > 13.5< / >< / > IntSmCo< / > 27.32< / > -0.08< / > 8.9< / >< / > IntSmVa< / > 34.13< / > -0.15< / > 12.7< / >< / > LgCo< / > 51.82< / > -0.03< / > 15.1< / >< / > US CoreEq1< / > 56.52< / > +0.01< / > 14.8< / >< / > US CoreEq2< / > 50.32< / > ...< / > 14.6< / >< / > Small< / > 59.00< / > -0.12< / > 13.7< / >< / > SmCpVal< / > 59.65< / > +0.08< / > 16.8< / >< / >

TgdVal< / > 42.01< / > +0.09< / > 14.8< / >< / > USLgVa< / > 66.95< / > +0.21< / > 20.4< / >< / > < ="4">Dodge & Cox< / >< / > Balanced< / > 13.70< / > +0.04< / > 4.0< / >< / > Income< / > 12.07< / > +0.01< / > -2.9< / >< / > Intl Stk< / > 18.08< / > ...< / > 9.8< / >< / > Stock< / > 17.59< / > +0.09< / > 8.0< / >< / > < ="4">DoubleLine Funds< / >< / > TotRetBdl< / > 8.38< / > +0.01< / > NA< / > |

基金 | 资产净值 (NAV)< / > 净变动< / > 年初至今回报率 (%)< / > 基金< / > 资产净值 (NAV)< / > 净变动< / > 年初至今回报率 (%)< / > | 富达 (Fidelity)< / > | 富达投资 (Fidelity Invest)< / >< / > 500ldxInstPrem271.32< / > -0.15< / > 15.1< / > < / > Balanc< / > 32.68< / > -0.03< / > 11.9< / >< / > Contrafund K6< / > 38.96< / > -0.11< / > 14.5< / > BluCh< / > 298.69< / > -2.38< / > 19.8< / >< / > EmgMktldxInstPrem< / > 16.69< / > -0.24< / > 22.0< / > BluChGr< / > -0.12< / > 12.8< / > | 富达 SAI (Fidelity SAI)< / >< / > USBdlxInstPrem< / > 10.01< / > ...< / > -2.3< / > FidSalCndlnxFnd< / > 15.68< / > -0.02< / > 10.1< / >< / > | 富达顾问 I (Fidelity Advisor I)< / > FidSalInfltnfnd< / > 9.68< / > +0.01< / > -1.6< / >< / > GrOppl< / > 271.75< / > -3.19< / > 16.2< / > IntValldxd< / > 14.31< / > -0.01< / > 13.7< / >< / > | 富达自由 (Fidelity Freedom)< / > TotalBd< / > 8.63< / > ...< / > -2.5< / >< / > Idx203InsPre< / > 24.03< / > -0.04< / > 6.7< / > | 富达精选 (Fidelity Selects)< / >< / > Idx203InsPre< / > 28.64< / > -0.06< / > 8.0< / > Semiconductors< / > 62.78< / > -1.63< / > 58.3< / >< / > Idx2040InsPre< / > 31.75< / > -0.07< / > 10.5< / > Tech< / > 58.12< / > -0.53< / > 45.1< / >< / > Idx2045InsPre< / > 34.53< / > -0.09< / > 12.2< / > | 富达战略 A (Fidelity Strategic A)< / >< / > Idx2050InsPre< / > 34.74< / > -0.10< / > 12.5< / > StratAeEmrMrt< / > NA< / > ...< / > NA< / > | 2周 %< / > | 52周 %< / >< / > | 最高 / 最低 变动< / > 股票< / > 代码< / > 最高 / 最低 变动< / >< / > 1.26< / > -1.9< / > RealREMAX< / > REAX< / > 14.02 - 10.0< / >< / > 1.88< / > -3.4< / > ReconTech< / > RCON< / > 0.90 - 9.0< / >< / > 0.96< / > 1.1< / > RedCat< / > RCAT< / > 5.38 - 6.6< / >< / > 15.86< / > -8.6< / > RedCloud< / > RCT< / > 0.12 - 3.5< / >< / > 4.54< / > -12.6< / > RedwoodTrust< / > RWT< / > 2.02 - 3.5< / >< / > 0.61< / > -7.9< / > RedwoodPfdA< / > RWTPA< / > 16.66 - 6.9< / >< / > 0.21< / > -6.3< / > RedwoodNts30< / > RWTP< / > 20.44 - 3.2< / >< / > 0.83< / > -3.5< / > RedwoodNts31< / > RWTS< / > 19.70 - 2.0< / >< / > 2.30< / > -11.0< / > ReinsuranceGrpDeb< / > RZC< / > 24.83 - 0.4< / >< / > 1.25< / > -8.5< / > ResideoTech< / > REZI< / > 16.62 - 2.6< / >< / > 0.43< / > -9.4< / > ResolutionMinerals< / > RML< / > 5.20 - 1.3< / >< / > 1.66< / > 0.6< / > ResourcesConnect< / > RGP< / > 2.71 - 0.7< / >< / > 1.75< / > -1.6< / > TeleSocolutions< / > ETSO< / > 1.80 - 1.0< / >< / > 3.98< / > -8.8< / > RezolveAI< / > RZLV< / > 1.73 - 8.4< / >< / > 3.59< / > -8.2< / > RichSparkle< / > ANPA< / > 1.80 - 5.7< / >< / > 12.03< / > -6.0< / > RegittelliCompWt< / > RGTIW< / > 3.91 - 15.7< / >< / > 10.39< / > -1.6< / > RocketCos.< / > RKT< / > 10.78 - 5.3< / >< / > 34.27< / > -2.0< / > RozeAI< / > RZAI< / > 9.83 。

1.8 | 5.86< / > -4.5< / > Rubico< / > RUBI< / > 0.41 - 16.8< / >< / > 39.15< / > -4.3< / > SOS< / > 0.25 - 12.9< / >< / > 4.26< / > -6.8< / > SS Innovations< / > SSII< / > 2.50 - 3.6< / >< / > 1.22< / > -1.8< / > SENEP< / > 1.78 - 8.8< / >< / > 15.02< / > -0.9< / > SanaBiotech< / > SANA< / > 2.59 - 6.1< / >< / > 0.27< / > -9.2< / > SaulCentersPfdB< / > BFSpF< / > 18.75 - 2.0< / >< / > 3.00< / > -8.6< / > SelectQuote< / > SLQT< / > 0.34 - 1.3< / >< / > 4.15< / > -3.8< / > ServeRobotics< / > SERV< / > 3.89 - 10.0< / > |

-6.3< / >< / > Stereotaxis< / > STS< / > 1.08< / > 2.7< / >< / > TetraTech< / > TEX< / > 1.46< / > -4.7< / >< / > StructureTherap< / > GPCR< / > 23.89< / > -6.4< / >< / > SunScoutA< / > SNSC< / > 0.94< / > 0.5< / >< / > SunshineBio< / > SBFM< / > 0.28-10.6< / > < / >< / > SurgePays< / > SURG< / > 0.12< / > -8.3< / >< / > Sylvamo< / > SVLM< / > 30.40< / > -4.6< / >< / > ADS-TEC Wt< / > ABSEW< / > 0.15< / > ...< / >< / > TMChemicals< / > TMCK< / > 2.87< / > -14.2< / >< / > TMU Mobile206< / > TTMUS< / > 20.63< / > -9.6< / >< / > TPG Mtg PfdB< / > MITPb< / > 17.57< / > -2.6< / >< / > TPG Mtg PfdA< / > MITPA< / > 18.52< / > 0.8< / >< / > TPG RE

Fin< / > TRTX< / > 5.78< / > -0.7< / >< / > Tele&DataPfdUU< / > TDSpU< / > 19.05< / > -1.4< / > |

基金< / > 资产净值 (NAV)< / > 净变动< / > 年初至今回报率 (%)< / >< / > | First Eagle Funds< / >< / > GlbA< / > 87.30< / > +0.25< / > 8.5< / >< / > | Franklin A1< / >< / > IncomeA1< / > 2.51< / > +0.01< / > 5.0< / >< / > | FrankTemp / Frank Adv< / >< / > IncomeAdv< / > 2.48< / > ...< / > 5.1< / >< / > | FrankTemp / Franklin A< / >< / > DynaTech A< / > 209.14< / > -3.03< / > 12.3< / >< / > Growth A< / > 149.51< / > -0.30< / > 11.0< / >< / > RisDv A< / > 97.38< / > +0.37< / > 8.1< / >< / > | Guggenheim Funds Tru< / >< / > TotRthBdRfCInst< / > NA< / > ...< / > NA< / >< / > | Harbor Funds< / >< / > CapAplnst< / > 131.59< / > -0.53< / > 12.9< / >< / > | JHF III DispVal< / >< / > DispValMCI< / > 30.87< / > +0.07< / > 12.4< / >< / > | John Hancock< / >< / > BondR6< / > 12.89< / > ...< / > -2.6< / >< / > | JPMorgan I Class< / >< / > CoreBond< / > 9.84< / > ...< / > -2.6< / >< / > EqInc< / > 28.59< / > +0.15< / > 16.7< / >< / > LgCpGwth< / > 87.43< / > -0.46< / > 6.9< / >< / > | JPMorgan R Class< / >< / > CoreBond< / > 9.86< / > ...< / > -2.4< / >< / > CorePlusBd< / > 6.92< / > ...< / > -1.7< / >< / > | Lord Abbett I< / >< / > ShtDurInc p< / > 3.78< / > ...< / > 1.0< / >< / > | Metropolitan West< / >< / > TotRetBdl< / > NA< / > ...< / > NA< / >< / > | MFS

Funds< / >< / > IIE< / > 42.47< / > +0.08< / > 4.7< / >< / > | MFS Funds Class I< / >< / > Valuei< / > 54.20< / > +0.36< / > 9.0< / >< / > | Natixis Funds< / >< / > LSGrowthY< / > 34.13< / > +0.10< / > 2.7< / > |

基金 | 资产净值 (NAV)< / > 净变动< / > 年初至今回报率 (%)< / > | Northern Funds< / >< / > Stkldx< / > 77.74< / > -0.04< / > 15.0< / >< / > | Old Westbury Fds< / >< / > LrgCpStr< / > NA< / > ...< / > NA< / >< / > | PGIM Funds CI Z< / >< / > TotalReturnBond< / > 11.44< / > ...< / > -2.4< / >< / > | PIMCO Fds Instl< / >< / > IntlBdUSD< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > TotRt< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > | PIMCO Funds A< / >< / > IncomeFd< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > | PIMCO Funds I2< / >< / > Income< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > | PIMCO Funds Instl< / >< / > IncomeFd< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > | Price Funds< / >< / > BlChip< / > 220.86< / > -1.26< / > 5.0< / >< / > LgCapGow I< / > 91.15< / > -0.67< / > 7.3< / >< / > | Putnam Funds Class A< / >< / > PutLargCap p< / > 45.55< / > +0.23< / > 16.5< / >< / > | Putnam Funds Class Y< / >< / > PutLargCap< / > 45.58< / > +0.23< / > 16.8< / >< / > | Schwab Funds< / >< / > 1000 Inv r< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > FunUSLgInst r< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > Intl Sel r< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > S&P Sel< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > TSM Sel r< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > | Strategic Adviser< / >< / > StratAdCorInFnd< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > StratAdFidCoreS< / > 8.78< / > ...< / > -2.1< / >< / > StratAdFidEmr< / > 18.88< / > -0.24< / > 24.3< / >< / > StratAdFidUS< / > 22.23< / > -0.02< / > 17.3< / >< / > StratAdIntlFnd< / > < / > ...< / > < / > |

-3.3< / >< / > TravisPharma< / > TRAV< / > 0.43< / > -11.2< / >< / > TravisGlobal< / > TGL< / > 0.77< / > -23.7< / >< / > TrilogyMetals< / > TMQ< / > 2.69< / > -2.5< / >< / > TritonIntlPfdD< / > TRTNpD< / > 20.50< / > -2.2< / >< / > TritonIntlPfdG< / > TRTNpG< / > 22.25< / > -0.4< / >< / > Tucows< / > TCX< / > 8.45< / > -7.2< / >< / > Turbogen< / > TRBG< / > 3.30< / > -5.4< / >< / > 22ndCentury< / > XXII< / > 0.69< / > -10.7< / >< / > UPF Inds< / > UFPI< / > 73.72< / > 2.6< / >< / > UPF OilPfdB< / > UMBFQ< / > 18.70< / > -5.7< / >< / > USGoldMining< / > USGO< / > 5.98< / > -2.1< / >< / > uCloudlink< / > UCL< / > 0.24< / > -3.8< / >< / > US Antimony< / > UAMY< / > 3.31< / > -8.7< / >< / > UnumNts061558< / > UNMA< / > 20.51< / > 0.2< / > |

基金< / > 资产净值 (NAV)< / > 净变动< / > 年初至今回报率 (%)< / >< / > StratAdMunBond< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > StratAdvFidIntl< / > 16.04< / > -0.04< / > 8.6< / >< / > | TIAA / CREF Funds< / >< / > EqIdxInst< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > IntlEqIdxInst< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > LrgCpGrIdxInst< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > | VANGUARD ADMIRAL< / >< / > 500Adml< / > 720.64< / > -0.40< / > 15.0< / >< / > BalAdml< / > 54.50< / > -0.03< / > 7.9< / >< / > CAITAdml< / > 10.94< / > ...< / > -2.9< / >< / > CapOpAdml

r | NA< / > ...< / > NA< / > | DivAppldxAdml< / > 65.14< / > +0.27< / > 10.5< / >< / > EMAdmr< / > 49.60< / > -0.18< / > 11.5< / >< / > EqIncAdml< / > 101.35< / > +0.40< / > 10.9< / >< / > ExplrAdml< / > 120.17< / > -1.20< / > 12.6< / >< / > ExtndAdml< / > 177.10< / > -1.22< / > 12.5< / >< / > GroIncAdml< / > 123.69< / > -0.16< / > 13.4< / >< / > GrwthAdml< / > 282.98< / > -1.10< / > 13.0< / >< / > HltCareAdml r< / > 87.53< / > +0.32< / > 5.7< / >< / > HYCorAdml

24.8< / >< / > RealEstatAdml< / > 129.48< / > +0.99< / > 6.2< / >< / > SmCapAdml< / > 138.09< / > -0.64< / > 12.8< / > |

< / > VIVVA< / > 2.14< / > -1.3< / >< / > VividSeats< / > SEAT< / > 2.84< / > -11.5< / >< / > VividSeatsWt< / > SEATW< / > 0.01< / > 6.7< / >< / > VoltitionRX< / > VNRX< / > 0.20< / > -3.9< / >< / > VoyagerTherap< / > VYGR< / > 2.25< / > -7.3< / >< / > WaveLifeSci< / > WVE< / > 3.27< / > -5.2< / >< / > WaFdPrdA< / > WAFDP< / > 14.97< / > -1.1< / >< / > Walker&Dunlop< / > WD< / > 32.08< / > -2.2< / >< / > Watsco

B< / > WSOB< / > 285.84< / > -7.5< / >< / > Wakechange< / > WKT< / > 0.65< / > -7.9< / >< / > WellsFargoPfdAY< / > WFcPf< / > 19.64< / > -1.3< / >< / > WellsFargoPfdAZ< / > WFcGZ< / > 16.60< / > -0.7< / >< / > WellsFargoPfdAA< / > WFcPA< / > 16.45< / > -0.6< / >< / > WestEnclaveRt< / > WENrC< / > 0.08< / > -19.8< / > |

d>3.27< / > -5.2< / > YorkvillentiCapWt< / > YCCW< / > 0.34< / > -5.5< / >< / > 14.97< / > -1.1< / > YYForce< / > YYFOR< / > 0.87< / > -11.1< / >< / > 32.08< / > -2.2< / > ZMH< / > 1.90< / > -5.9< / >< / > 285.84< / > -7.5< / > ZenaTech< / > ZENA< / > 0.95< / > -1.8< / >< / > 0.65< / > -28.3< / > ZeppHealth< / > ZEPP< / > 3.59< / > -3.0< / >< / > 19.64< / > -1.1< / > ZetaNetwork< / > ZNB< / > 0.81< / > 8.6< / >< / > 16.60< / > -0.7< / > ZhibaTech< / > ZBAO< / > 2.19< / > -16.4< / >< / > 16.45< / > -0.6< / > Zhongchao< / > ZCMD< / > 1.35< / > -12.6< / >< / > 0.08< / > -19.8< / > ZoneFrontierB< / > ZONE< / > 0.11< / > -10.2< / > |

基金< / > 资产净值 (NAV)< / > 净变动< / > 年初至今回报率 %< / >< / > SmGthAdml< / > 119.81< / > -1.42< / > 13.2< / >< / > STIGradeAdml< / > NA< / > ...< / > NA< / >< / > STIPSlxAdm< / > 24.32< / > +0.02< / > 1.4< / >< / > TotBdAdml< / > 9.24< / > ...< / > -2.4< / >< / > TotIntBldxAdm< / > 18.78< / > ...< / > -0.9< / >< / > TotIntlAdmlx r< / > 45.26< / > -0.22< / > 12.5< / >< / > TotStAdml< / > 185.72< / > -0.21< / > 14.8< / >< / > TxMCapAdml< / > 400.50< / > -0.39< / > 14.7< / >< / > TxMln

r< / > 22.43< / > -0.12< / > 12.8< / >< / > USGroAdml< / > 206.44< / > -1.03< / > 5.8< / >< / > ValAdml< / > 86.38< / > +0.34< / > 17.7< / >< / > WdsrlAdml< / > 93.12< / > +0.51< / > 12.5< / >< / > WellsIAdml< / > NA< / > ...< / > NA< / >< / > WelltnAdml< / > 81.77< / > +0.01< / > 7.7< / >< / > WndsrAdml< / > 83.44< / > +0.21< / > 13.6< / >< / > | VANGUARD 4

FDS | DivdGro< / > 32.38< / > +0.16< / > 6.6< / >< / > FTAIWldnAdml< / > 51.16< / > -0.25< / > 12.8< / >< / > LifeGro< / > NA< / > ...< / > NA< / >< / > LifeMod< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > PrmpcCor< / > 46.60< / > -0.35< / > 25.8< / >< / > STAR< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > TgtRe2020< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > TgtRe2025< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > TgtRe2030< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > TgtRe2035< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > TgtRe2040< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > TgtRe2045< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > TgtRe2050< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > TgtRet2055< / > < / > ...< / > < / >< / > TgtRetInc< / >

< / > ...< / > < / >< / > Welltn< / > 47.36< / > +0.01< / > 7.6< / >< / > | 先锋指数基金 (VANGUARD INDEX FDS)< / > |

D et< / > 基金< / > 资产净值 (NAV)< / > 净变动< / > 年初至今回报率 (%)< / >< / > .2< / > ExtndInstPI< / > 437.01< / > -3.01< / > 12.5< / >< / > A< / > IdxIntl< / > 27.06< / > -0.13< / > 12.4< / >< / > M< / > MdCpGrAdml128.61< / > -1.61< / > 7.5< / > < / >< / > M< / > MdCpVIAdml105.26< / > +0.49< / > 16.4< / > < / >< / > M< / > SmValAdml< / > 100.81< / > +0.10< / > 12.4< / >< / > .5< / > TotBd2< / > 9.11< / > ...< / > -2.4< / >< / > .8< / > TotIntlInstldx< / > 181.00< / > -0.88< / > 12.5< / >< / > .7< / > TottlInstPIld< / > 181.04< / > -0.89< / > 12.5< / >< / > .8< / > TotSt< / > 185.68< / > -0.21< / > 14.7< / >< / > W< / > | 先锋机构 (VANGUARD INSTL)

86.38< / > +0.34< / > 17.7< / >< / > | WCM焦点基金 (WCM Focus Funds)< / >< / > | WCMScrtintGwlns< / > 27.44< / > -0.01< / > 10.3< / > |

华尔街日报 — CMO 委员会

华尔街日报 CMO 委员会峰会

November 17-18, 2026 / 纽约州纽约市

与共同塑造关于建立影响力及推动业务前进对话的行业领袖们相聚。

特邀嘉宾:

Ndidi Oteh

首席执行官

埃森哲 Song (Accenture Song)

Jonathan Adashek

高级副总裁兼首席全球事务官

IBM

Mark Kirkham

首席营销官

百事公司 (PepsiCo) 美国饮料业务

主赞助商:

Oshiya Savur

首席营销官

e.l.f. Beauty

Gülen Bengi

玛氏公司 (Mars Inc.) 首席全球营销官

玛氏零食业务全球首席增长官

Sophie Goldschmidt

总裁兼首席执行官

美国滑雪和单板滑雪协会

Jennifer Temple

执行副总裁兼首席营销与传播官

HPE

Rachel Epstein

美国国家女子足球联赛 (NWSL)

Adobe Deloitte.

Frank Cooper III

Visa

贡献赞助商:

申请邀请函:发送电子邮件至 CMOCouncil@wsj.com 或扫描二维码。

Airbnb 仍有望在 AI 威胁中胜出

这家住宿平台的股票若要在机器人时代繁荣,必须将重复客户转化为忠诚客户

Sept. 2026

首席执行官 Brian Chesky 今年早些时候在旧金山的一次 Airbnb 活动上。

像 Muse 这样的 AI 智能体已经能为你找到巴黎最便宜的酒店房间。但它们无法为你找到你一直关注的那座卡茨基尔山(Catskills)木屋的更便宜版本,因为该房源可能仅在 上提供。

投资者应当关注这一区别。当 Meta 平台公司上个月推出其 Muse 智能体时,包括 Booking Holdings、Expedia 和 在内的旅游股均大幅下跌。

然而, 有真正的机会在这次动荡中脱颖而出。难点在于:其股价已经反映了高于行业的增长。为了证明其估值的合理性, 需要将重复客户转化为忠诚客户。

在线旅游公司的大部分收入来自于简化搜索并收取预订费用。AI 智能体威胁到了这种模式。

但并非所有旅游市场都面临同样的风险。Booking 和 Expedia 销售的主要是旅客也可以直接预订或通过竞争网站预订的酒店房间。如果智能体能在其他地方找到同一个房间,它就没有理由偏好 Booking 或 。

Booking 和 还销售赞助列表,将旅客引导至特定的房产。富国银行估计,明年这些收入将占 营收的约 $8% ,且在利润中的占比更高。

有更多适应手段。其超过一半的房源仅在自有平台提供,且超过 90% 的流量直接来自其应用程序或网站。

客户关系在预订后也不会结束。伯恩斯坦(Bernstein)分析师 Richard Clarke 指出,$90%$ 的 客人会继续就到达时间、钥匙或当地税费向房东发送消息,这使得 与交易双方都建立了联系。

---

Airbnb今年的增长似乎正在加速。

来源:FactSet

这些公司如何应对可能的智能体(agentic)未来,具有很强的指示意义。

Expedia迅速成为了Muse的合作伙伴。Airbnb则没有,其首席执行官布莱恩·切斯基(Brian Chesky)表示,到目前为止,AI聊天机器人一直是一项助力,将客户引导至Airbnb的网站。

他在上个月的一次Skift会议上打趣道,聊天机器人可能适用于购买纸巾,但人们享受规划旅行的过程。他认为,浏览数十套房屋并不是一个基于文本的聊天机器人所擅长的事情。

尽管如此,就在Airbnb试图说服投资者其高昂的估值倍数是合理的时候,AI带来的焦虑出现了。在其2020年首次公开募股后的数年里,该股票(交易价格约为远期收益的25到30倍)一直停滞不前。投资者将其视为一家以增长溢价交易的成熟运营商。

今年,Airbnb的增长似乎正在加速。该公司在公布第二季度业绩并上调全年营收增长指引后,股价在8月份跳升。富国银行分析师肯·加夫雷尔斯基(Ken Gawrelski)将此归功于在重组后的领导团队下进行的一系列产品改进。

这些变化包括:允许房客先预订后付款、增加酒店选项,以及重新设计的首页和应用程序。投资者还在押注接下来的动作,包括增加数千家酒店、汽车租赁,以及最终引入广告。

讽刺的是,其中一些增长驱动因素正将Airbnb推向更接近Booking和Expedia所经营的业务模式——而这种业务模式正是AI智能体可能威胁到的类型。即使AI智能体占据了旅行规划和预订的大部分份额,Airbnb依然能获得需求。但它和其他公司将逐渐失去对客户如何寻找和选择房源的控制权。

这将削弱投资者所期待的广告机会。对于Airbnb和其他平台而言,更关键的一点是,失去对客户获取的控制可能意味着放弃部分定价权和利润率。

为了让自己无懈可击,Airbnb可能会参考另一家目前与AI智能体保持距离的电子商务巨头:亚马逊(Amazon)。

与亚马逊一样,Airbnb拥有忠实的客户群和难以匹敌的供应。但它没有像Prime会员那样能让客户在转向其他平台前三思而行的机制。

这就是忠诚度发挥作用的地方。商务旅客之所以选择希尔顿或万豪,是因为足够的入住天数能让他们获得特权。而休闲旅客很少在一家连锁酒店积累入住记录。Airbnb拥有数百万个房源和大量回头客,但没有广泛的奖励计划。它已开始尝试在酒店入住中提供积分,但它应该将忠诚度视为一项优先战略,而不仅仅是一次促销。

Airbnb还计划在明年推出自己的AI智能体。但使用智能体的旅行者可能仍然希望它能同时搜索Airbnb、Vrbo、Booking和酒店网站,而不是将其限制在一家公司的库存中。

加夫雷尔斯基表示,最终,Airbnb可能不得不与智能体制造商达成协议,利用其独特的房源作为筹码来谈判有利的条款。

他补充道,此类协议以及针对忠实房客的奖励,从长期来看可能会侵蚀该公司大约13%的抽成率(take rate)。但如果这些措施能带来足够的额外预订,这种权衡可能是值得的。

历史提供了一个无需恐慌的理由。从桌面端向移动端的转变曾让Alphabet和亚马逊的投资者感到不安,但这两家公司最终都成为了主要受益者。拥有价值资产的公司如果在平台转型中适应得足够快,可能会变得更强大。

Airbnb拥有机器人无法轻易取代的房源。现在,它需要给房客一个坚持在平台上预订这些房源的理由。

——大卫·韦纳(David Wainer)

何时该担心狭窄的股市反弹

标准普尔500指数(常规)相对于标准普尔500等权重指数的超额收益,自……以来:

……ChatGPT发布至今

……雅虎IPO至科技泡沫顶峰

注:雅虎的IPO日期为1996年4月12日;ChatGPT的发布日期在1,409天前

来源:FactSet

股市接近历史高点,但许多股票也处于低谷。这就是投资版的“两件事可以同时成立”。

截至周五,尽管基准指数在历史高点附近徘徊,但标准普尔500指数中仅有三分之一的股票交易价格高于其50日移动平均线。你可能听说过这种狭窄的领涨情况——用一个被用滥了的笑话来说,就是“广度糟糕”。

许多专家认为这是一个问题,但情况很复杂。短期广度读数仅偶尔预示回调,且通常只是小幅回调。

这也是市场历史的缩影。多元化投资者持有数百家公司,但大多数股票从长远来看并不能为投资者赚钱。过去一个世纪中,极少数公司贡献了历史涨幅的一半。

不过,有时狭窄的市场走势确实预示着重大的周期性转折点。这种情况发生在……

发生在某些股票规模扩大,然后在短时间内产生不成比例的市场涨幅,凭一己之力推动指数走高时。

……每只股票的等量持有,而标准指数则按其市值比例持有。

标准普尔500等权重版本多年来一直被

---

短期广度读数仅偶尔预示回调。

被广泛关注的市值加权版本击败。这种情况在2022年11月ChatGPT发布且AI成为唯一焦点时进一步加剧。

当一组大公司在短短几年内拉开巨大差距时,随之而来的通常是更快速的清算,且通常是熊市。伟大的技术进步无法改变这一点。这种模式在无线电、Nifty Fifty(精选50只股)和互联网泡沫时期都曾出现,这次可能也不例外。

自ChatGPT亮相以来,市值加权的标准普尔500指数的总回报率比等权重指数高出近50个百分点。若要寻找一个与ChatGPT时期在历史上相似的时刻,在雅虎1996年首次公开募股(IPO)后的相同交易日数量后,标准普尔500指数领先其等权重孪生指数的幅度几乎完全相同。

也许等权重指数本身就比较差?并非如此。

自1990年以来,它一直胜过标准普尔500指数。这并非偶然,因为保持等权重会迫使指数倾向于规模较小、价格较低的股票——这两个因素已知能提升长期回报。

更有趣的一点是等权重指数何时获胜。就像被拉紧的橡皮筋,它反弹回原状的速度比被拉伸成那个形状的速度快得多,且过程更为痛苦。

—Spencer Jakab

金融与投资

美国股票资金流向,月度

来源:EPFR

---

股票聚焦

---

Chipotle

由于有报道称星巴克否认了可能尝试收购这家卷饼连锁店的猜测,其股价下跌3.8%。

---

IREN

在The Information报道该公司与Anthropic达成协议后,这家云计算公司的股价微跌1.1%。

这家数据中心公司的股价飙升16%,此前该公司表示已筹集约$900 million用于升级公司资产,其中包括FTX原有的比特币挖矿业务。

Valero和马拉松石油(Marathon Petroleum)

由于投资者在权衡美国增加柴油供应举措的影响,美国石油炼制企业的股价微涨。

大众汽车

这家德国汽车制造商表示,由于公司继续受到中国市场恶化的影响,第三季度交付量下降。股价微涨不足0.1%。

---

市场历史回顾

APIC / GETTY IMAGES

1971年的今天,英特尔(Intel)上市。

---

周二事件:

◆ 美联储发言人:美联储理事克里斯托弗·沃勒(Christopher Waller)出席在新德里举行的彭博新经济论坛。

◆ 经济数据:9月份成屋销售、ADP就业数据、9月份财政预算以及约翰逊红皮书(Johnson Redbook)零售销售指数。

---

预期公布财报公司:

摩根大通(JPMorgan Chase)

强生(Johnson & Johnson)

联合健康(UnitedHealth)

高盛(Goldman Sachs)

富国银行(Wells Fargo)

花旗集团(Citigroup)

达美乐比萨(Domino's Pizza)

---

美国股票基金流入量达到狂热状态

投资者涌入美国股票基金的速度在市场历史上极为罕见。

美国股票基金已连续13个月录得资金流入,这是EPFR自2000年以来数据中最长的一次连续增长记录。

—Gunjan Banerji

---

赛富时股票评级上调

在美银(Bank of America)对其人工智能战略表示信心并发布看好评级后,赛富时(Salesforce)股价上涨2.1%。

该银行将该股的评级从“跑输大盘”上调至“买入”,并将目标价从160美元提高至285美元。

尽管此前有人担心AI可能会使传统的企业软件公司过时,但美银分析师指出,大型企业不太可能更换承载其业务逻辑、数据、工作流和合规框架的平台。赛富时强劲的自由现金流以及预期的营收增长加速,进一步支撑了此次评级上调。

—Vicky Ge Huang

SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP

ZUMA PRESS

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.

DOW JONES

News Corps

\* \* \* \* \*

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2026 \~ VOL. CCLXXXVIII NO. 88

DJIA 51850.55 ▲ 195.60 0.38%

NASDAQ 27245.90 ▼ 0.4%

WSJ.com

STOXX 600 635.65 ▲ 0.6%

10-YR. TREAS. Closed (5.243%)

OIL \$93.74 ▲ \$1.89

U.S. Edition

GOLD \$4,165.80 ▼ \$25.20

EURO \$1.1157

YEN 158.63

What's News

Business & Finance

◆ Major U.S. stock indexes ended mixed, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq losing 0.06% and 0.4%, respectively, and the Dow gaining 0.4%. The U.S. bond market was closed for the Columbus Day holiday. A1

◆ Lawsuits are piling up against Dodgers owner Mark Walter, brought by senior citizens who purchased annuities from his insurance companies. B1

◆ A bitcoin-mining business that appeared left for dead after the collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried's crypto empire is being resuscitated to serve the AI build-out. B1

Meta Platforms released an AI model whose utility will be tested by how much it can improve retention and accelerate adoption of the company's Muse agent. B3

◆ Quantum-computing

company IonQ struck an all-

stock deal to buy closely

held Elisity in a transaction

that values the cybersecurity

firm at up to \$1.3 billion. B5

◆ Dating-app company Bumble is in advanced talks to be taken private in a deal that values it at roughly \$1 billion. B4

♦ Volkswagen's deliveries fell in the third quarter as the German automaker continued to suffer from a deteriorating market in China. B3

♦ China failed to report a recovery in auto sales in September, traditionally the start of peak season. B3

◆ In a legal filing, supermarket chain Albertsons is demanding its top rival Kroger pay it at least \$8 billion after their grocery megadeal imploded two years ago. B1

---

Worldwide

♦ Iran is fortifying its defenses, rallying loyalists and threatening a wider and harsher response against the U.S. and its Gulf allies as it prepares for potential American attacks after the midterm elections and seeks to deter them. A1

♦ A suspected plot to attack a U.S.-run military air base in England was “almost certainly” directed by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham said. A6

♦ NATO's top military commander sought to steady an anxious Europe by outlining the alliance's new plan to thwart a potential Russian assault along its eastern flank. A8

◆ U.S. economists Robert E. Hall and Michael Woodford were awarded the Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences for their work on the role of household and business expectations in providing the foundations of economic stability. A2

◆ Trump said he is considering firing Kimberly Guilfoyle, his ambassador to Greece, after revelations that she asked a donor to cover personal expenses in the lead-up to her confirmation hearing. A3

counted for more than half of the \$300 million that Trump raised for the new White House ballroom and legacy projects around Washington, a filing indicates. A4

◆ British comedian and actor Russell Brand appeared in a London court for the start of his trial on rape and sexual-assault charges. A6

Federal Agents Search Congresswoman's Home

© 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

RAID: Homeland Security Investigations officers carry boxes Monday from the Washington residence of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) during a search described as part of a criminal investigation. Omar's office called it 'an outrageous abuse of power.' A3

◆ Died: RJ Mitte, 34, actor on “Breaking Bad.” A2

Options- Trading Frenzy Shows Bullish Investors' Zeal for Risk

Market's soaring volumes hit \$700 billion a day—akin to meme-stock mania

BY KRYSTAL HUR

AND HANNAH ERIN LANG

Individual investors aren't letting anything get them down these days.

Their fervor is showing up in frenzied trading of options, or contracts that allow holders to buy or sell a stock at a set price, by a certain date. Volumes in options tied to individual stocks have recently reached levels seen during the meme-stock mania of 2021, about \$700 billion of notional volume a day, according to Carrick Lane, an investment manager specializing in options strategies. The prices of call options, which give the right to buy, have eclipsed levels seen during that time.

A new generation of individual investors discovered the markets during the post-Covid rally, and by early 2021 many amateur traders were pushing into more complicated, and often riskier, bets. A boom in stock options and other derivatives was under way.

Those markets are now abuzz with retail activity once again, and Wall Street knows the reason: Individual investors are looking past rising interest rates, \$100 oil prices and war in the Middle East. They are focusing on strong corporate earnings and are as comfortable rolling the dice on volatile markets as they were back when GameStop, Roaring Kitty and AMC Entertainment were the talk of Reddit forums.

Bullishness among individual investors, as measured by the percentage who expect stock prices to rise over the next six months, reached 40.3% for the week ended Oct. 7, according to the latest survey from the American Association of Individual Investors. That is the highest level since mid-July and comparable to levels seen in 2021.

Many, like 41-year-old Ku-nal Berry, are buoyed by the success of the artificial-intelligence trade and optimistic about the technology's poten-Please turn to page A2

◆ Heard on the Street: How to look at a narrow rally..... B10

Iran Preps For More War Amid Trump's Threats

Regime, convinced the U.S. is ready to strike, rallies Iranians, fortifies nuclear sites

BY BENOIT FAUCON

Iran is fortifying its defenses, rallying loyalists and threatening a wider, harsher response against the U.S. and its Gulf allies as it prepares for potential American attacks after the midterms and seeks to deter them.

Iranian officials have warned publicly and in private conversations with regional officials that the Islamic Republic will respond with further escalation across the Middle East if the U.S. launches new strikes.

Satellite images show Iran is strengthening sensitive locations, including nuclear sites and border areas, to make them more resilient to attacks. The government is also preparing Iranians for renewed war, sending paramilitary forces to read war stories to kindergartners, advertising training in firing shoulder-mounted antiaircraft missiles and holding rallies.

Iran has little ability to defend against attacks from advanced U.S. jets, high-altitude bombers or cruise missiles, giving it an incentive to try to deter such attacks with threats. The belligerent tone also serves as a distraction from the deepening economic misery Iranians are experiencing as the U.S. tightens sanctions and pressures airlines not to fly to the country, tightening the blockade.

"The war footing is serving them well for now due to an impasse on many fronts—dip-Please turn to page A6

FICO Hit By Rise Of Rival

FICO credit scores have long played a critical role in mortgage-underwriting decisions. Now regulators and lenders have opened the door to using a rival, VantageScore. The move to break Fair Isaac's hold over the mortgage market has sent its stock down about 60% this year. B1

Soaring Welfare Spending Is Crushing Britain

Disability benefit claims surge, but leaders struggle to make cuts

BY MAX COLCHESTER AND DAVID LUHNOW

LIVERPOOL, England—Catherine Wieland got on Britain's welfare rolls in 2021. With a history of emotional trauma, she was too anxious to go outside or carry out simple tasks like washing herself, she told the government.

Soon, she was receiving about £700, or \$1,000, a month in disability benefits. And, it turns out, going outside quite a bit.

Using a taxpayer-subsidized program for those with disabilities, Wieland paid a small deposit for free use of a BMW, which she used to regularly visit the hair salon, dine out, attend a pride parade and visit an amusement park. According to court reports in her fraud conviction, she also flew to Cancún, Mexico.

Wieland's case is an extreme example of a new reality in the U.K.: Disability payouts are no longer just for those most in need; they've become a financial crutch for a swath of the population as wages stagnate and prices rise.

It's blowing up Britain's welfare bill, hamstring its politicians and imperiling its long-term financial stability.

Please turn to page A10

First-Class Amenity Kits Are Now Holy Grail Collectibles \* \* \*

Travel enthusiasts accrue free toiletry pouches by the dozens; ‘I love every single one’

BY VICTORIA ALBERT

Like most New Yorkers, Andrew Lim doesn't have much space in his apartment.

The e-commerce specialist shares a tight one-bedroom with his husband in Manhattan. But there will always be room for one prized possession.

sion: His collection of about 200 airline amenity kits, the travel-sized toiletry pouches that come free with first- and business-class seats on long-haul flights. Lim, a travel

Lim, a travel content creator, has spent decades accumulating the kits. After flying more than 3 million miles, his collection includes rare finds like United Airlines' 'Star Wars' collaboration and newer offerings like China Airlines' partnership with Marc Jacobs.

Gold status

He keeps them all tucked away in a closet—out of sight of his husband, who isn't as keen on the enterprise. But sometimes, he can't resist taking them out for a trip down memory lane.

"He thinks I'm crazy," said Lim, 51.

For most fliers, amenity kits are a quick fix for the annoyances of even business-class travel: A sleep mask to darken the cabin; lip balm and lotion to help with dry air; socks to find a little more com-

fort. But for the rare travel enthusiast, they are so much more: a way to memorialize a favorite trip or claim a piece of airline history.

Devotees collect them by the dozens, even hundreds. They show them off alongside Pleaseturn to page 412

Please turn to page A12

INSIDE

Hope Swells in Venezuela For Oil Industry's Revival

PERSONAL JOURNAL

PERSONAL JOURNAL

Is your grown child pulling away? Look for the early signs of estrangement. A11

BUSINESS & FINANCE

Tom Cruise was going after a best actor Oscar. Then 'Digger' flopped. B1

BY KEJAL VYAS

CABIMAS, Venezuela—An oil gusher discovered more than 100 years ago gave birth to Venezuela's energy industry near this once-booming city on the shores of Lake Maracaibo. Today, Cabimas is at the center of the U.S. effort to resurrect the sector.

This city of 350,000 resembles an oil-industry graveyard. Mangled drill towers and collapsing offshore platforms are visible as far as the eye can see. Hardened globs of crude cling to fishing nets pulled from the lake, and natural gas gurgles up from busted underwater pipelines. The lake's shores are black with petroleum.

Nearby, children play baseball between leaky pump jacks that often stop working because of power outages that last up to 12 hours a day.

Many residents here said they can't wait for U.S. investors to arrive and start plowing money into rebuilding the country's dilapidated oil infrastructure. Many remember the boom years when oil workers enjoyed housing provided by international oil companies, along with neighborhoods with swimming pools, sports clubs and golf courses, and a lake with clean water and healthy marine life.

The question they are asking is: Can the U.S. bring the good times back?

“God willing, the foreigners will come back soon and we’ll have a better quality of life,” said José Medina, a fisherman with five children. But he is worried it will take a long time. “It feels like we’re neither moving forward nor backward.”

The decaying industry here reflects two decades of mismanagement under late President Hugo Chávez and his successor Nicolás Maduro, whom the U.S. captured in a raid in January and is prosecuting in New York on drug-trafficking charges, which Maduro denies. Industry executives and experts said residents' fears are well-founded: Reviving Vene-

Please turn to page A10

Military spending share of GDP

CAPITAL ACCOUNT | By Greg Ip

A Nordic Plan for Defense, and Growth

Projected growth, 2026

Projected fiscal deficit or surplus as share of GDP, 2026 $^{†}$

\*Excluding production abroad by Danish companies, growth would be around 2%

†Includes central, state and local governments. Standardized measure, which may differ from national fiscal authorities.

Sources: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (military spending); National central bank (projected growth); OECD September Outlook (fiscal deficit/surplus)

Sweden's central bank has been worrying about what cashless consumers would do if an emergency such

as a Russian cyberattack took down the electrical or communications grid.

And so as of July, Swedish consumers can buy essential goods using their Mastercard and Visa cards without a network connection. The central bank (the Riksbank) wants to go further by enabling offline purchases with Swish, a local mobile payments system that bypasses the Visa and Mastercard networks altogether.

“What this whole geopolitical situation has brought about is that you need to be redundant in your operations,” the governor of the Riksbank, Erik Thedéen, explained in an interview.

"If we look on our payment system, it happens to be that we have two credit cards that are from the same country, the U.S.," he said. "I think we should keep that in mind."

The initiative, in its own small way, shows how much this corner of the world has changed. Few countries thrived as much from globalization and the end of the Cold War as the Nordics—Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland and Iceland.

That world is gone. Russia threatens their territory, China threatens their markets, and they can no longer count on the U.S. to defend either. A visit to Denmark and Sweden showed me how they are pivoting to this reality: sinking more money and manpower into defense; tackling vulnerabilities in payment systems, supply chains and trade relations; and integrating their economies, defense industries and militaries more tightly with each other and Europe.

Far from paying a price, they seem to be thriving, an encouraging sign for the rest of the world.

Few members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization have responded as energetically to President Trump's demand to shoulder more of their own defense as the Nordics. Last year, Denmark and Norway each spent more than the U.S. on defense as a share of GDP, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. A decade ago they spent a third as much. Sweden and Finland aren't far behind.

As notable has been the political consensus behind the buildup. In elections in Denmark in March and Sweden last month, parties on the left and right, including the far-right anti-immigration parties, supported the military boost.

The reason: Russia looms across the Baltic Sea. The Danish Defense Intelligence Service has concluded that after a ceasefire in Ukraine, Russia would be ready to hit the Baltics within two years, and able to wage large-scale war in Europe within five, assuming NATO is slow to re-arm and the U.S. doesn't help.

“People know that, so they know why [rearmament] is so crucial,” said Flemming Moller Mortensen, a member of parliament with the Social Democratic Party, which leads the governing coalition.

The change in mindset shows in more mundane ways. Just as Sweden has made sure payment cards work if the

grid goes down, Denmark has asked households to keep three days' worth of essentials on hand, including food, water, medicine and a solar or battery-powered radio.

Young adults face the prospect of being drafted. Sweden reinstated conscription in

2018 and will call up 9,000 recruits this year, compared with 3,500 in 2018. It is debating lifting the prohibition on conscripts serving outside Sweden. Denmark has made women eligible and extended conscripts' service to 11 months from four.

Trump's lukewarm commitment to NATO and efforts to annex Danish-ruled Greenland (shelved under an agreement with Denmark last month) woke Danes and Swedes up to their dependence on U.S. technology for security: Patriots for missile defense, Palantir for police and military AI, even Microsoft in desktop software. Like most of Europe, Denmark struggles to compete with Silicon Valley on innovation. Startups such as Zendesk and Unity often move their headquarters to the U.S.

"The ownership of technologies has become a factor in all conflicts," said Martin Lidegaard, Danish minister of business and competitiveness. While the U.S. is still Denmark's most important business partner, "we need to ensure...that we will not be depending on American technologies."

Denmark has taken small steps—such as making drones for Ukraine with Ukrainian expertise—to build a defense base. Lidegaard plans to unveil a more ambitious strategy for stimulating defense production.

While Sweden has a substantial defense industry, it is pushing joint procurement with European allies and Canada to lessen dependence on the U.S. It is buying frigates from France, and France is buying the GlobalEye radar surveillance plane from Sweden's Saab. Canada, which makes GlobalEye's airframe, is weighing a purchase.

The U.S. remains their main market, but incremental growth will increasingly come from elsewhere, helped by free trade pacts the European Union has signed.

“We can trade with Canada today more easily than with the United States,” said Lars Sandahl Sorensen, head of Dansk Industri, Denmark’s main business association. “We have heavy investment into Australia now in the green transition.”

And they are deepening cooperation with each other. Lidegaard and his Nordic counterparts just announced a Nordic Growth Alliance to promote cooperation in sectors such as quantum technology, data centers and space, while reducing red tape.

Elsewhere, the transition to a less open, more dangerous world has been costly. Military spending is contributing to the fiscal crisis now engulfing France. A trade war with the U.S. has laid Canada's economy low. German politics have been convulsed by the rise of a right-wing party.

Denmark and Sweden are coping better in part thanks to lessons learned from the past. In the 1990s Sweden endured bank failures, soaring deficits and unemployment, and interest rates that briefly hit 500%.

“Everything that you see that you think is good in Swedish economic policy, is very much a child of the 1990s crisis,” said the Riksbank’s Thedéen. That includes tough rules on deficits, an independent central bank, and a pension system that indexes retirement to lengthening lifespans. It has made it difficult for politicians to be fiscally profligate, he said.

Denmark recently has run surpluses. Any country afraid of turning into France could do worse than to study Denmark and Sweden.

Two Americans Win Nobel Prize for Economics

The prize committee announcing the winners of the Nobel for economics in Stockholm.

JONATHAN NACKSTRAND/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

BY PAUL HANNON

Two U.S. economists, Robert E. Hall and Michael Woodford, have been awarded the Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences for their work on the role of household and business expectations in providing the foundations for economic stability.

Hall is a professor of economics at Stanford University, while Woodford holds the same position at Columbia University. The 12 million Swedish kronor prize, equivalent to roughly \$1.3 million, will be shared equally.

Policies first proposed by John Maynard Keynes in the 1930s to stabilize the economy when it is either running too cold or too hot were effective until the 1970s, when they proved unable to respond to a series of energy shocks.

The Nobel organization said the work of Hall and Woodford helped to provide a framework for understanding why those policies failed, and emphasized the importance for governments and central banks of communicating clearly with households and businesses about their plans and their reasons for intervening.

"The understanding of the people making decisions about spending, their expectations of what policy is likely to be like in the future is crucial to the effects of policy," Woodford told reporters.

The Nobel committee highlighted Woodford's 2003 book "Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy" as the key work that outlined the new framework founded on his research and that of Hall. "I'm elated," Woodford said. "It's a tremendous honor, it's a surprise."

Hall also described the award as a surprise. “I’ve spent my career trying to understand how the economy works, following interesting questions wherever they led,” he said. “When I thought I had a new idea, the next step was to find out whether it was actually new, whether it was right, and whether it mattered."

One key example of the new approach is the use of forward guidance by central banks, in which they offer businesses and households a clear understanding of how interest rates are likely to change.

Forward guidance was widely adopted by central banks following the global financial crisis, when their key rates had already been lowered to zero and further stimulus was needed to avoid a slide into deflation. By assuring households and businesses that borrowing costs would remain low for a significant period, central banks hoped to stimulate borrowing for investment.

“Making more explicit statements about the likely future path of interest-rate policy was an important part of the response in the years from 2009 onward and I think it did contribute to better stabilization,” Woodford said.

That form of forward guidance, however, has fallen out of favor in the 2020s, where the global economy has been buffeted by supply shocks that make it difficult to make even tentative commitments about the future rate path. Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh is a critic of the use of forward guidance.

The work of Hall and Woodford also emphasizes the importance of credibility for the success of central bank and government policies. Their work suggests that if they believe central banks will raise their key rates enough to tame inflation, households and businesses are less likely to behave in ways that reinforce the move in prices.

Options Show Zeal For Risk

Continued from Page One

Source: Carrick Lane

Continued from Page One

tial to transform business and

the economy.

Note: Notional volumes

"The growth is there," the Los Angeles based consultant said. Berry has chased gains in megacap tech names including Nvidia, Amazon and SpaceX. "The short-term volatility—you've just got to have the stomach for it," Berry said.

The meme-stock craze might have faded as many of the era's favorite stocks eventually lost their luster. But individual investors' enthusiasm for the markets has only grown stronger over the past five years. This cohort kept "buying the dip" even during

April 2025, when a global trade war rattled pro investors and triggered a deep sell-off. They helped crown a new class of AI darlings and piled into the SpaceX initial public offering. And they are still buying today.

On Monday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.4%, or about 196 points. The S&P 500 fell less than 0.1% and the Nasdaq composite lost 0.4%.

In another sign investors are feeling much as they did in 2021, more traders are comfortable betting on short-term price moves.

More than half of current single-stock options volumes are concentrated in contracts less than two weeks away from expiring, according to John Marshall, partner at Carrick Lane.

One reason behind their persistent optimism is strong corporate profits, which have helped drive stocks to repeated records this year.

\$800 billion

Companies in the S&P 500 are expected to report earnings growth of about 30% for the third quarter from the prior year, according to FactSet. For 2026, profits are expected to jump 33%.

Individual investors have grown a bit more selective in

2026, analysts said, opting to throw their weight behind a few high-conviction names over buying broader market dips. And retail activity slowed during the summer, following an explosive rally in shares of memory stocks and chip makers that peaked in June.

But that summer cooldown historically tends to reverse in October, according to data from Citadel Securities—and DIY traders could be even more plugged in through the rest of the year.

Not everyone is all-in on derivatives, either.

But even more risk-averse investors are choosing to stay in the market.

The top position bought by Charles Schwab clients in September was an exchange-traded fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. That is the first time an ETF has taken that spot since Schwab began collecting that data in 2021. Clients also snapped up call options tied to ETFs last month, according to Schwab.

“It’s a little bit more cautious optimism,” said Joe Mazzola, head trading strategist at Charles Schwab. “They’re definitely looking to buy dips.”

---

U.S. WATCH

OBITUARY

---

RJ Mitte, 34, 'Breaking Bad' Star

"Breaking Bad" actor and disability-rights advocate RJ Mitte died Monday at age 34, authorities and his representatives said.

Cameron County Justice of the Peace Cyndi Hinojosa declared Mitte, who had cerebral palsy, dead at what she believed was his home in Brownsville, Texas. She was unable to provide a cause, but an autopsy will be performed.

—Associated Press

---

NEW YORK Actress in Custody After Plane Incident

Actress Selma Blair was taken into custody after a flight from Los Angeles to New York for being physically abusive and injuring two flight attendants, authorities said. Blair, 54, was taken into custody Sunday night at New York's JFK airport. In a statement, a Blair representative said she had a medical emergency that led to the alleged conduct. She was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 2018.

-Associated Press

---

CORRECTIONS & AMPLICATIONS

Readers can alert The Wall Street Journal to any errors in news articles by emailing wsjcontact@wsj.com or by calling 888-762-5450.

---

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (USPS 664-880) (Eastern Edition ISSN 0099-9660) (Central Edition ISSN 1092-0935) (Western Edition ISSN 0193-2241)

Editorial and publication headquarters: 1211

Avenue of the Americas, New York, N.Y. 10036

Published daily except Sundays and general legal holidays. Periodicals postage paid at New York, N.Y., and other mailing offices.

Postmaster: Send address changes to The Wall Street Journal, 200 Burnett Rd., Chicopee, MA 01020.

All Advertising published in The Wall Street Journal is subject to the applicable rate card, copies of which are available from the Advertising Services Department, Dow Jones & Co. Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, N.Y. 10036. The Journal reserves the right not to accept an advertiser's order. Only publication of an advertisement shall constitute final acceptance of the advertiser's order.

Letters to the Editor:

Fax: 212-416-2891; email: wsj.ltrs@wsj.com

Need assistance with your subscription?

By web: customercenter.wsj.com;

By email: support@wsj.com

By phone: 1-800-JOURNAL (1-800-568-7625)

Reprints & licensing:

By email: customreprints@dowjones.com;

By phone: 1-800-843-0008

WSJ back issues and framed pages: wsjshop.com

Our newspapers are 100% sourced from sustainably certified mills.

GOT A TIP FOR US?

SUBMIT IT AT WSJ.COM/TIPS

ANGELA OWENS/WSJ

Federal Agents Search Omar's Home

Homeland Security immigration probe is cited; she attacks 'abuse of power'

BY SADIE GURMAN

AND JOHN MCCORMICK

WASHINGTON—Federal agents searched the Washington, D.C., home of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.) Monday as part of a criminal investigation, people familiar with the matter said.

Agents from Homeland Security Investigations conducted the search, the people said. Details of the investigation couldn't be determined, but one of the people said it was long-running and immigration-related.

Omar is one of the original members of what is known as the Squad, a group of progressive congresswomen of color known for challenging Democratic leadership and being vocal critics of President Trump.

The Justice Department said the agents executed a court-authorized search in the District of Columbia area but declined to elaborate.

Omar's office issued a statement objecting to the search.

“This raid by Trump’s DHS is an outrageous abuse of power and an unprecedented escalation in the weaponization of federal law enforcement to target political enemies. For a decade, Donald Trump has relentlessly targeted Congresswoman Ilhan Omar with inflammatory rhetoric, repeatedly putting a target on her back. Now, those attacks have escalated to a pointless federal raid,” the statement said.

The search took place just three weeks before November's elections in which Omar is running for a fifth term. The Justice Department traditionally seeks to avoid public investigative steps involving political candidates within 60 days of an election, to avoid the appearance of partisan influence.

Trump said federal officials are looking “very carefully” at Omar.

"I've always found her to be totally crooked," Trump said. "She's a terrible person. Just a complainer. She comes from a country that is a non-country, and then she comes over here and she complains about our Constitution."

Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin told a conservative podcaster in September that there was a continuing federal investigation into Omar, who he said “married her brother to try to bring him into the United States.” She has denied that claim for more than a decade.

Omar, 44 years old, has long been a target for attacks from Trump and conservatives.

Born in Mogadishu, Somalia, in 1982, Omar arrived in the U.S. in the 1990s. Her family moved to Minnesota as she entered high school.

Omar shares her Washington home with her husband, Tim Mynett.

The congresswoman was first elected in 2018 from a heavily Democratic district that includes Minneapolis.

TIM EVANS/REUTERS

Rep. Ilhan Omar

Yosemite Land Swap Sets Off Fight

BY KATE KING

A sliver of meadow and trees on the edge of Yosemite National Park has become an unlikely battleground over whether development is allowed in national parks.

Developer Jeff Pori and the National Park Service signed a preliminary agreement in which he would transfer a piece of California property in exchange for about an acre on the western boundary of Yosemite National Park's nearly 750,000-acre expanse.

The National Park Service recently signed a preliminary agreement for a land swap with a Las Vegas developer. Under the arrangement, the federal government would give about an acre on the western boundary of Yosemite National Park's nearly 750,000-acre expanse, nestled in California's Sierra Nevada.

That would allow developer Jeff Pori to build a short road into the park from his adjacent property. Without it, he said, guests at the rustic resort Pori is planning would have to drive about 45 minutes along winding dirt roads to reach the park's main entrance.

In exchange, Pori agreed to transfer to the National Park Service a similarly valued piece of property located elsewhere in California. He said his project would add needed lodging to the popular park, allowing more people to enjoy it.

"I remember a lot of hiking and a lot of streams and rivers around there," said Pori, who grew up in the Bay Area and camped in Yosemite with friends and family as a child. "It's just like heaven, really."

News of the proposed land exchange set off a fury among conservationists, former Yosemite officials and many members of the public. Cicely Muldoon, a former superintendent of Yosemite, said the swap would set a dangerous precedent by signaling that protected natural spaces can be bartered away to private interests.

“It’s not a piece of land that you use for real-estate transactions,” Muldoon said.

Pori's attorney, Lanny Davis, said he has received so many threatening notes that he hit his iPhone's limit for blocking email addresses.

The blowback shows how fiercely protective Americans are of their national parks—particularly the “crown jewels” such as Yosemite, best known for its waterfalls—and how some consider any move toward private development to be crossing a line.

The Trump administration has a different view. It has been willing to consider opening protected federal land to private developers and businesses.

Last year, the administration formed a task force to identify federal land that could be used to build affordable housing in an effort to address the nation's housing shortage.

Federal agencies are also pursuing proposed land exchanges with private landowners. In Texas, a federal judge recently allowed a proposed land swap between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Elon Musk's SpaceX to proceed.

In Georgia, the National Park Service has signed preliminary agreements to give federal land to two private landowners on Cumberland Island, a federally protected barrier island wilderness, in exchange for privately owned parcels in ecologically sensitive areas.

Some land exchanges involving national parks have happened over the years, including an agreement with a public utility in the Everglades and a swap that allowed the island of St. John to build a public school on a parcel of the Virgin Islands National Park.

But conservationists say land exchanges have historically been used only to expand the boundaries of federal parkland.

"Now they're using that same authority to break off pieces of the park to benefit a private developer," said Ed Stierli, vice president of government affairs for the nonpartisan advocacy group National Parks Conservation Association.

In 2024, Pori purchased 83 acres just outside the boundary of Yosemite. The property, known as Hazel Green Ranch, is an undeveloped parcel of meadowland.

Pori, through his real-estate firm Kingsbarn Realty Capital, wants to build something similar to what Hazel Green Ranch's former owner had proposed: a 150-room lodge and cabins scattered around the meadow's perimeter.

But for the business to work, he needs to build a 700-foot-long road across federal land connecting his property to the Big Oak Flat Road leading into Yosemite.

Pori knew getting approval would be an uphill battle. He is friends and business partners with Russell Geyser, the son of Hazel Green Ranch's previous owner, Lewis Geyser, who previously lost a five-year legal battle over the issue.

Pori said he first asked Yosemite officials two years ago for an easement that would allow him to build his proposed road and was told “no.” He and Davis then met last year with officials from the Interior Department, who offered a possible solution: a land exchange.

Critics have pointed to Pori's political contributions, which total \$4,700, to Republican campaigns and candidates, including Trump, as evidence that his request may have received special consideration.

The Interior Department's press office said there was no political pressure to reach a predetermined outcome on the exchange, which is still far from finalized. Pori and Davis said they never sought political favors. Even if the land exchange moves forward, Pori faces a long process before he can get approval for his proposed development.

“I bought this with absolutely no guarantee,” he said. “I knew that going in.”

Trump Says He Is Considering Firing Guilfoyle

BY PHILIP WEGMANN

President Trump said he is “looking at” firing Kimberly Guilfoyle and that he “is not happy” with his ambassador to Greece after revelations that she asked a donor to cover personal expenses in the lead-up to her confirmation hearing.

The Wall Street Journal first reported text messages of Guilfoyle asking Trump donor Eric Deters to wire \$100,000 to her American Express account last year. "It won't show up anywhere if you wire money to American Express,"

she wrote on Signal. "Please."

Deters, a former congressional Kentucky candidate, had previously paid Guilfoyle in speaking fees. He made a similar \$200,000 payment to Donald Trump Jr. and \$100,000 to Eric Trump. He refused, however, to pay her credit card bill.

The State Department Office of the Inspector General is now investigating whether Guilfoyle received gifts or favors from private businessmen. The Wall Street Journal later reported on audio of the diplomat boasting that Greek business magnates had paid for her flight to Paris along with luxurious hotel accommodations.

Asked on Monday about the reports of potential misconduct by Guilfoyle and whether he might fire her, Trump said, "Well, we're looking at it. Yeah, we're not happy."

Trump administration officials spent the weekend discussing whether Guilfoyle should continue on as ambassador in light of the allegations. Some floated asking the envoy to voluntarily relinquish her post to save Trump from the embarrassment of having to fire her, according to a senior administration official familiar with the deliberations.

A spokesman for Guilfoyle didn't return requests for comment.

Jesse Binnall, a lawyer for Guilfoyle, previously told The Journal that the ambassador disputed the authenticity of the messages showing her asking Deters to pay her credit-card bill. He said she had been paid to speak at events before her nomination and “was owed a balance for traveling to and supporting these patriotic events.” Deters said he didn’t owe Guilfoyle any balance.

Guilfoyle was previously engaged to Donald Trump Jr., the eldest son of the president.

Rep. Don Beyer (D., Va.) called for Guilfoyle to be fired and “if she broke the law, which seems highly likely, prosecuted.” California Rep. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the House oversight committee, in a letter to Guilfoyle said the reported conduct “raises serious public corruption and national security concerns” and requested she provide financial records and copies of her communications with certain government officials.

California Ride-Share Drivers Turn to New Union

Left, drivers in August; right, Margarita Peñalosa says the cost of driving has doubled since 2017.

FROM LEFT: MIKE BLAKE/REUTERS, MARGARITA PEÑALOSA

BY PAUL KIERNAN

LOS ANGELES—When Margarita Peñalosa began driving for Uber and Lyft in 2017, eight hours a day was enough to cover living expenses and send cash to family in Colombia. Now she said it takes 12-hour days.

"The cost of driving is twice what it was when I started," said Peñalosa, who is 46.

Her frustrations explain why she and more than 50,000 California ride-share drivers recently signed cards to join the newly formed California Gig Workers Union. Organizers have told drivers the union could help them secure more take-home pay in one of the nation's least affordable states, where the country's highest gasoline prices and a growing fleet of driverless taxis undercut gig-work economics.

The union marks the biggest U.S. effort yet to organize a workforce that numbers in the millions nationwide. Ride-share drivers set their own schedules, giving them flexibility to care for children or work other jobs. But since they are classified as independent contractors rather than employees, gig workers lack traditional labor protections in most of the U.S. Those include minimum-wage laws, workers' compensation and collective-bargaining rights.

Instead of an hourly wage,

Uber and Lyft drivers are paid by the ride. To receive trip requests, they must be “online” with the ride-share app. Drivers are offered upfront rates determined by the platforms’ proprietary algorithms and must learn to quickly distinguish worthwhile trips from low-paying ones.

They don't get paid for time spent behind the wheel waiting for trip requests or driving back from a distant drop-off with an empty back seat.

More mostly Democratic cities and states are extending new labor protections for gig workers. Massachusetts certified the nation's first union for ride-share drivers in May, a few months ahead of California. Illinois could soon follow after Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed a law in August that will allow Uber and Lyft drivers to unionize.

California and Massachusetts also guarantee drivers a minimum wage based on the time they spend actively driving passengers, though the rest of their time remains uncompensated.

In Oregon, Portland's city council considered a proposal this year to cap the “take rate,” or share of a passenger's fare that goes to Uber and Lyft, at 20%. New York City, Washington state and Minnesota have adopted rules guaranteeing drivers earn a minimum amount per mile.

Drivers pay vehicle-related expenses, including insurance, repair and maintenance costs that have all outpaced inflation in recent years. And they are hit by gasoline prices that are up more than 50% this year nationwide. California drivers are filling up at about \$6.31 a gallon for regular, the highest average of any state, AAA said.

Lyft declined to comment on driver pay. An Uber spokesman said the company's drivers earn more than \$34 an hour in California "when actively working"—meaning the time between accepting a ride and dropping off a passenger—an increase of 17% since 2019.

After factoring in their operating costs and the time they spend online but not actively serving customers, several ride-share drivers in Los Angeles said their actual hourly earnings often fall below the state's \$16.90 minimum wage. "The gas is killing me," said Artur Gevorkyan, 46, who has been driving for Uber since 2015.

He earned \$1,006 before taxes and expenses for about 22 hours of active driving time in one of his better recent weeks, according to a review of his pay statement. Measured by active driving time, that means he was grossing nearly \$45.50 an hour. But after including 30 additional hours he spent online for Uber, his pretax income for that same week would come out to less than \$19.50 an hour.

His expenses include a \$600 monthly payment on his 2019 Infiniti QX60, nearly \$800 every six months for the insurance and close to \$70 for gasoline on a typical 250-mile day.

Gridwise, an analytics platform used by hundreds of thousands of Uber and Lyft drivers, estimates that average gross pay nationwide was \$24.38 an online hour in the second quarter. That was up 7.3% from a year earlier but down about 10% from 2021.

Uber and Lyft haven't fought the unionization push partly because the California bill that allowed drivers to unionize was part of a legislative bargain that reduced the ride-share companies' insurance costs.

AARON SCHWARTZ/GETTY IMAGES

Top donors to the 'anti-Aipac' super PAC Contributions to candidates and political committees

A felled tree is seen at East Potomac Golf Links on Saturday. As many as 430 trees had been removed despite a court order.

Judge Blasts Administration For Felling Golf-Course Trees

BY LOUISE RADNOFSKY

An angry federal judge overseeing litigation challenging President Trump's plan to overhaul a Washington, D.C. public golf course said the administration violated her instructions by cutting down hundreds of trees around East Potomac Golf Links on short notice over the weekend.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, who had previously warned the administration not to take irreversible steps on the project without telling her, on Monday temporarily barred further tree removal, and warned the government that she would initiate contempt proceedings for the slightest violation.

She also demanded to hear from three Interior Department officials under oath about plans the government made for the removals in the days before it told the court about them late Friday. Workers began taking down trees Saturday morning, and Reyes yelled at the suggestion from a Justice Department lawyer that as many as 430 trees had been removed.

“I have given the government every single benefit of the doubt that it would not do what it has done,” the Biden-nominated judge said during the three-hour hearing.

“What has happened has cost the government all of its credibility” in the case, she said.

By the end of the hearing, Reyes questioned “whether or not I’ve been lied to.”

Justice Department lawyer Marissa Piropato said the tree removal was part of a long-standing maintenance plan and was unconnected to any golf course project. “This is not a renovation, your honor,” she said.

The East Potomac facility has been open for more than a century, offering the public affordable green fees in a picturesque setting close to Washington's famous monuments.

Trump has described the facility as run down and talked for months about redeveloping it, with an eye toward creating a course that could host major golf tournaments. He previously said the renovation would begin in September.

In court papers filed over the weekend, the administration said the project “remains at an early and conceptual stage.”

The DC Preservation League sued earlier this year, raising several legal arguments, including that the project raised environmental concerns and exceeded the president's authority. The administration said its actions were legally compliant and argued the lawsuit was premature.

Trump has raced through several projects in the nation's capital, including the building of a White House ballroom. Courts have struggled to keep up.

Reyes in previous hearings expressed concern that the Trump administration could move quickly on the golf course renovation and then tell her it was too late to “stop the trains.”

The judge during those hearings said the government needed to inform her before taking major actions.

Trust Used by Trump, Allies Lands Windfall

Ten megadonors accounted for more than half of the \$300 million that President Trump raised for the new White House ballroom and legacy projects around Washington, according to a new filing from the nonprofit he and his allies are using to take in the money.

---

By Brian Schwartz, Annie Linskey and Theo Francis

The identities of the donors, who contributed between \$10 million and \$25 million apiece, weren't included in the public filing by the Trust for the National Mall, a long-established nonprofit which the White House has also used to manage funds it raised for the triumphal arch and the Rose Garden.

The annual filing shows the trust recorded \$320 million in contributions and grants last year, up from less than \$10 million in 2024. Three contributors gave \$25 million apiece. The trust also racked up \$210 million in expenses last year, the filing shows, most of it going to maintenance and capital improvement projects.

The documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal don't show how much money has gone to each project and they don't name the donors. The White House has previously identified some ballroom donors but hasn't disclosed how much they contributed.

Spokespeople for the Trust for the National Mall and White House didn't respond to requests for comment.

The Journal has reported that Apple cut a check for around \$25 million toward the White House ballroom project, while Microsoft gave around \$10 million, among others. YouTube, a subsidiary of Alphabet, gave \$22 million to the nonprofit for the ballroom as part of a settlement for a 2021 civil lawsuit that Trump brought against the company.

The Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Foundation contributed \$20.3 million to the trust, labeling the sum as “restricted — White House ballroom” in its own tax filing. It was by far the largest contribution during the year reported by the Perlmutter Foundation, created by former Marvel Entertainment chairman Ike Perlmutter and his wife.

Trump has made beautifying Washington a priority in his second term and pushes companies and donors to write checks for tens of millions of dollars to finance these projects, the Journal has reported. His chief fundraiser, Meredith O'Rourke, calls major companies frequently making specific, at times eight-figures asks, the Journal reported.

No laws prohibit presidents from raising unlimited sums of money for nonprofits and public disclosure of donors isn't required. Trump's unprecedented fundraising from companies with business before his administration has raised concerns from congressional Democrats about the potential for conflicts of interest. A spokeswoman for Trump previously said the president is the “most successful fundraiser in modern political history” and “President Trump can't be bought.”

The newly released documents do provide some detail as to how the funds were spent. The trust paid more than \$800,000 to Florida Architectural Precast, a concrete manufacturer, for construction and other project services.

Meet the Donors Who Are Powering the Left's Upstarts

Progressive candidates in the Journal analysis $^{†}$

\*Includes 24 progressive PACs and advocacy groups. Jan. 1, 2025, through Oct. 7, 2026. Another \$4.6 million was spent across 23 other states and D.C., and nothing in 15 states. iCA-11 had two progressive candidates in its primary.

Sources: AdImpact (spending); AP (results, incumbents)

In Michigan this year, a new super PAC vowing to fight pro-Israel money chipped in more than half a million dollars to help progressive Abdul El-Sayed's Senate bid. Its funders: a crew of virtually unknown political donors, many of whom had never given to politics before last year but have since donated up to \$1 million each.

---

By Maggie Severns, Anthony DeBarros and Kara Dapena

In New York, billionaire Alex Soros cut checks directly to progressive politicians, including Reps. Pramila Jayapal of Washington and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.

Those donations are part of the millions of dollars that Soros and his father, George, plan to give to Democratic causes this year.

And in Philadelphia, nearly a million dollars in TV advertising paid for by outside groups is boosting Democratic U.S. House candidate Chris Rabb, highlighting his endorsement from New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and his willingness to fight for Medicare for All.

The left flank of the Demo-

---

The Mamdani Factor

Zohran Mamdani's election as mayor of New York City last fall sparked a new era of politics and a new generation of political donors, many of them critical of the war in the Middle East and frustrated by Aipac spending to support politicians who back Israel.

cratic Party raises and spends only a fraction of what many Republicans and the Democratic establishment do on elections. But as the far left gains momentum, supporters are working to expand their funding.

Even the Democratic Socialists of America, which is funded exclusively by membership dues and relies largely on volunteers, has been experimenting with raising more money.

While introductory dues for DSA members usually start at \$10 a month, the organization's newer option to pay income-based "solidarity dues" set contributions at a much heftier 1% of member's incomes. "Give your 1% for the 99%," the DSA's website advertises.

Another group that focuses on identifying and helping progressive candidates, Justice Democrats, said its goal is to remain competitive in races where opponents can use funding advantages to overwhelm progressives with ads.

“We will never have the amount of money that Aipac or crypto have,” said Usamah Andrabi, a spokesman for the group, referring to the pro-Israel American Israel Public Af-

In the past, donors to progressives were generally older, wealthy hippies or successful Hollywood players.

The new group skews younger, often comprises Americans of South Asian or Middle Eastern heritage, and works in fields such as technology and medicine.

Sathvik Kaliyur, CEO of

■ American Priorities super PAC ■ Other Mamdani donor fairs Committee and a cryptocurrency industry that has spent more than \$90 million during the midterms. (Aipac spokeswoman Deryn Sousa said the group “is a membership organization of individual Americans, not an industry.”)

Sources: Federal Election Commission (contributions); NYC Campaign Finance Board (Mamdani)

Here is how the progressive movement compares with other big-money counterparts:

fundraising firm NWF Strategies, whose clients have included Mamdani and El-Sayed, said his goal is to make it easier for candidates who don't come from money to run.

Many of the biggest checks are going to a super PAC that aims to be an “anti-Aipac” force, called American Priorities, which has used its funds to support progressives who criticize Israel, including more than \$1 million to help elect Claire Valdez and Darializa Avila Chevalier, two DSA-backed candidates who won New York congressional primaries.

The ads didn't mention Israel or the Palestinian territories as an issue: Instead, they stressed affordability and that the two women were “Mamdani-endorsed.”

One of the group's funders, Texas entrepreneur Sam Mahrouq, said he supports efforts that “encourage a balanced American foreign policy and oppose corption, discrimination, endless wars and excessive special-interest influence.”

Who are the big donors?

The biggest donors often wouldn't consider themselves Democratic socialists:

The list includes old-school progressives and donors interested in abortion rights and the environment whose money is helping candidates who share their views on those issues.

Establishment groups are also now backing progressive candidates who won their primaries in tossup districts, including in California's Central Valley.

A super PAC linked to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and an affiliated group, for example, have spent or booked more than \$9 million in television advertising to help educator Randy Villegas.

Some Democrats running in red districts are receiving unexpected help: A super PAC launched by Democratic Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker.

It has reserved more than \$2 million of television advertising in a Tennessee district that leans heavily Republican to support Justin Pearson, who has been endorsed by Ocasio-Cortez.

Methodology

The Wall Street Journal reviewed Federal Election Commission filings for 52 campaign committees and 19 PACs. Candidates were included based on endorsements by Democratic Socialists of America, Justice Democrats and the Working Families Party as of September. PACs were included based on ad spending in races that included the progressive candidates. To calculate donor totals, the Journal searched records of individual contributions. Because donors often appear in FEC filings with several name spellings, addresses or employers, the Journal combined amounts when it could determine that records represented the same individual.

Top donors to progressives

Contributions to progressive candidates and political committees

Saikat Chakrabarti (Calif., tech and politics) ran for Congress this year in California, gave more than \$11 million to his own committee, which he has since converted to a super PAC.

PROGRESSIVE CONTRIBUTIONS

Democracy PAC (N.Y., finance) run by George and Alex Soros, backs both Democratic establishment causes and the left.

Deborah Simon (Ind., real estate investment scion) is a longtime Democratic megadonor known for her support of Planned Parenthood.

NJ-10 NY-18 NY-19 PA-07

Susan Mandel (Conn., finance) is a major donor to environmental causes. \$2.5 M

NY-18 NY-19 PA-07

Mary Quinn Delaney (Calif., real estate investing) she and her family's trust give to a range of Democratic candidates and causes.

Source: Federal Election Commission (contributions)

Data is everywhere. Intelligence is not.

---

By: George Popstefanov, Founder and CEO, PMG

AI accelerates analysis, automates tasks, and generates more output than any organization can absorb. Customer signals update in real time. Media fragments by the hour. Commerce, culture, and technology move faster than the operating models built to manage them.

Yet most growth models still operate in silos.

Access to data is not the same as intelligence. And intelligence alone is not an advantage.

The advantage comes when intelligence drives action.

Companies have invested billions in technology designed to create visibility. But visibility without integration has not created better performance. It has created more complexity.

More data has not solved fragmentation. It has exposed it.

The companies outperforming today are not those with more information. They are the ones structurally built to act on it. They operate as integrated systems where strategy, activation, commerce, and measurement align in real time. Intelligence does not sit in reports. It compounds.

In 2010, we set out to build for this moment.

From the beginning, PMG was engineered as a platform company. One system integrating people, technology, and intelligence into accountable growth.

Our proprietary operating system, Alli, connects strategy to execution and execution to measurement, creating continuity between decisions and outcomes. Insights become decisions. Decisions build on each other. Performance compounds.

This is not a services model enhanced by technology.

It is a system built for how modern businesses grow.

As AI reshapes workflows and the lines between content, media, and commerce continue to blur, the gap between insight and action will widen. The companies structured to close that gap will lead. Those that are not will struggle to keep pace.

Data will multiply. Tools will evolve.

PMG is a platform company built for that future.

The next era will belong to those engineered to act.

WORLD NEWS

Xi's Superpower Ambitions Fuel Debt Spiral

Note: 2025 figures are estimates. Excludes debt tied to special construction funds and other government-guided funds. Converted at \$1=6.7 yuan.

Source: International Monetary Fund

Chinese leader is presiding over surge strangling economy and spilling abroad

BY BRIAN SPEGELE

Chinese leader Xi Jinping, intent on pouring trillions into making China a technological and military superpower, is presiding over a dangerous spiral of debt that is strangling the domestic economy and damaging trade partners.

Rising debt loads in many countries have spooked investors of late. But few nations have seen a surge more dramatic than China.

Last year, China's credit to the nonfinancial sector—a broad measure of corporate, government and household borrowings—topped $300\%$ of gross domestic product, 60 percentage points higher than at the end of 2019 and now far bigger than in the U.S. It has jumped by more than \$43 trillion since Xi took office in late 2012, according to the Bank for International Settlements.

Much of the money has been wasted, financing factories and apartment blocks for which there isn't enough demand, sparking debilitating price wars, and hurting profits and wages.

Many economists say China likely isn't facing an imminent financial crisis, in part because the debt buildup has largely relied on domestic savings, rather than foreign investors who might be quicker to dump it.

But China's debt deluge is increasingly becoming the world's problem, too. Chinese companies that need to service this enormous debt are churning out more cars, solar panels and electronics than consumers at home want. In response, exporters are pouring these goods onto foreign markets, opening up a trillion-dollar annual trade surplus.

Despite trade tensions with many countries—including ris-

Chinese government debt, by type

ing anger in Europe over a flood of Chinese electric cars and other exports—Beijing appears unwilling to change course.

One challenge for China is the huge amount of debt carried by unprofitable companies, much of which can't easily be repaid as overall growth stagnates. Efforts to cut back on extending fresh credit to such firms could expose Chinese state banks to big losses.

"If you want to change that system, you have to accept a lot of losses, and I think the Chinese government is not ready for that," said Camille Boullemois, associate director at research firm Rhodium Group. "The most likely scenario is that it continues getting worse slowly and there's a sort of slow decay of the financial system that becomes increasingly inefficient at producing growth."

By kicking the debt problem down the road, it also allows Xi to remain focused on investing in new technologies, the military and other strategic priorities. Chinese officials see a window of opportunity now to firmly establish China as a great power alongside the U.S., and consider investment in core technologies such as artificial intelligence, space technology and energy as crucial.

China's government says its debts are under control. Central-government borrowings were only around $30\%$ of GDP in recent years, small compared with federal debts in the U.S.

But that doesn't account for the bulk of China's problem, which sits at the local level.

In particular, financing firms tied to local governments ran up trillions of dollars of new liabilities over the past few years as they tried to drum up enough business to hit economic growth targets and keep people in their cities employed. Many such firms were involved in local real-estate development and have been hit hard by China's yearslong property bust.

A broader gauge of overall Chinese government debt—including official local borrowings as well as the debts of these local government financing vehicles—ballooned to an estimated 127% of GDP last year, according to the International Monetary Fund, up from 98% in 2020.

Even as Chinese officials signal they prefer to stick to the current course, “we are seeing a system running into some of its limits,” said Jacob Gunter, head of the economy and industry program at the Mercator Institute for China Studies, a Berlin-based think tank.

“Local governments are subsidizing loss-making companies to keep them alive,” said Gunter. “But the fact that they are loss-making also means that there are no profits to tax.”

UNITED KINGDOM

---

Russell Brand's Trial For Rape Begins

British comedian and actor Russell Brand appeared in a London court on Monday for the start of his trial on rape and sexual-assault charges.

The hearing was adjourned until Tuesday after a morning of jury selection.

Brand, 51 years old, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of rape, three counts of sexual assault and one count of indecent assault. The charges involve six women and alleged offenses between 1999 and 2009.

Prosecutors said at previous hearings that Brand is accused of raping a woman in a hotel room at a Labour Party conference, grabbing a TV staffer's breasts and forcing her into a sex act in a toilet, and kissing and groping a radio-station employee.

—Associated Press

---

Pyongyang Tests Ballistic Missiles

North Korea on Monday fired several ballistic missiles toward its eastern waters, South Korea's military said, adding to a recent streak of weapons demonstrations that has heightened tensions during a freeze in diplomacy.

Jang Do-young, spokesperson of South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff, said missiles of various types were fired from an area around the North Korean capital of Pyongyang, where the country's main airport has been a major launch site in recent years.

Jang said one of the missiles flew more than 560 miles before falling into the sea, but he didn't comment on the flight details of the other weapons. The joint chiefs didn't specify how many missiles it detected.

BRITAIN

---

Iran Likely Behind Attack: Burnham

A suspected plot to attack a U.S.-run military air base in England was “almost certainly” directed by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham said Monday.

He had said there were strong indications Iran was linked to the apparent plan last month to attack the RAF Fairford air base, which has been used by U.S. bombers to strike Iran in the continuing war.

Police have arrested seven men, but all suspects have been released on bail and no one has been charged. Iran has denied involvement.

"I can confirm our assessment that it is highly likely to have been coordinated in Iran, almost certainly directed by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard," Burnham said.

—Associated Press

WORLD WATCH

LIGHTING THE WAY: Parishioners celebrated the Feast of Our Lady of Aparecida at the Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida in Brazil on Monday.

VOLUNTARY PUBLIC TENDER OFFER FOR ALL RECORDATI SHARES

We recognize the value of our shared journey.

Today, the Offer is worth even more, even if you have already accepted it.

OFFER PRICE PER SHARE,

GUARANTEED AND IN CASH \*\*.

€53

+16.61% "PREMIUM" TO THE OFFICIAL SHARE PRICE RECORDED ON 25 MARCH 2026\*\*\*

If you are a RECORDATI shareholder, accept the Offer.

ACCEPTANCE PERIOD EXTENDED UNTIL OCTOBER 23\*\*\*\*.

To accept the Offer, please read the Offer Document and the Issuer's Statement carefully and contact your bank, financial advisor or investment manager\*.

More than 100 years on, Recordati's journey continues thanks to those who have shared in its growth.

Accept the Voluntary Tender Offer launched by Respighi BidCo S.p.A. - a company indirectly participated by CVC Capital Partners IX Aggregator SCA SICAV-RAIF and Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA - for the acquisition of all the ordinary Recordati shares at the Offer Price of €53\*\* recognizing to the shareholders accepting the Offer a 16.61% premium to the official price of the shares as at 25 March 2026.

CVC GBL

Promotional communication. Before accepting the Voluntary Public Tender Offer, launched exclusively in Italy and extended to the United States of America in accordance with Section 14(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, please read carefully the Offer Document in its entirety, together with the Italian-language summary prepared by the Offeror, the issuer's statement attached to the Offer Document, and the additional documentation relating to the Offer, available, inter alia, on the Issuer's website (www.recordati.com) and on the Global Information Agent's website (https://transactions.sodali.com). This communication does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to accept the Voluntary Public Tender Offer, nor does it replace the investor's own assessment of the merits of the transaction information channels are available throughout the Acceptance Period, Monday to Friday, from 06:00 (CET) to 28:00 (CET), toll-free number 800 126 352 (from Italian landlines', direct line - 30 169/287/0-70) and will be required for further information about the period. The following paper is published by: Per paper. \*\*Offer price following the press release published by: The Offer on 6 October 2026, pursuant to which the offer price was increased and the acceptance period of the Offer was extended. For the avoidance of double, shareholders who tendered their shares to the Offer prior to 6 October 2026 will also be entitled to receive the offer price (equal to Euro 53.00 per share) if the Offer is successfully completed. \*\*\* Calculated on the basis of the offer price (equal to Euro 53.00 per share), increased by the 2025 Dividend Balance (equal to Euro 0.71 per share) paid by the Company on 20 May 2026 as the remaining time.

\*\*\*\* Acceptance Period from 31 August 2026 to 23 October 2026 (inclusive), subject to any Reopening of the Terms in accordance with applicable law.

Iran Preps To Counter U.S. Threat

Continued from Page One

lomatically, economically and politically,” said Sanam Vakil, Middle East director at London’s Chatham House think tank. “With a new war, the Islamic Republic could dig itself out of the cul-de-sac it has dug for itself.”

In an attempt to deter a potential attack, some Iranian officials have hinted that their forces could conduct land incursions into neighboring nations, people familiar with the warnings said. The country's top national-security official, Mohsen Rezaei, said on Sunday Tehran could target the United Arab Emirates, which has largely escaped being attacked since late spring, as well as data centers and internet cables across the region.

Tehran has separately warned Arab officials it could strike regional targets, including Saudi oil facilities in the event of a renewed conflict, some of the people said. That would add to the threat Saudi Arabia faces from Iran-backed Houthi militants in Yemen, who attacked its capital's international airport over the weekend.

The U.S. military has itself been gearing up for a possible return to fighting. A third aircraft carrier strike group and another Marine expeditionary unit are steaming toward the Middle East, and the Pentagon is weighing sending additional air-defense equipment and munitions to bases in the region, The Wall Street Journal has reported.

While President Trump last week ruled out an attack before the midterm elections on Nov. 3, he has also publicly mulled hitting Iran's Pickaxe Mountain nuclear site, and U.S. officials have said the military is preparing a range of options for new strikes. Trump, a Republican, said over the weekend that the U.S. was in communication with the Houthis but might join Saudi strikes on the militant group. "What they did was very bad," the president said on Saturday night, referring to the deadly attack on Riyadh's airport.

The efforts by both sides to shore up their fighting capacity underscore how, more than seven months into the war, neither side feels compelled to give up a fight that is largely deadlocked. The U.S. has ramped up its economic-pressure campaign and is guiding tankers through the Strait of Hormuz with increasing success.

Iran has stepped up its strikes on vessels in the Persian Gulf area. At least three commercial vessels were hit over the weekend in and around the strait, according to U.K. Maritime Trade Operations, which is affiliated with the Royal Navy. A drone attack set a fire on Emirati tanker Petro Dolphin near Oman on Sunday, leaving two Indian sailors missing.

---

Neither side is inclined to give up a fight that is largely deadlocked.

The missile attack by Houthi militants on the Riyadh airport killed at least 13 people and injured hundreds more on Saturday, the single deadliest attack on the U.S. or its Gulf allies in the conflicts related to the Iran war.

The attacks highlighted the vulnerability of major economic targets in the region if Trump decides to resume fighting.

The government has also told mediators it would more aggressively target U.S. personnel, including by trying to sink U.S. warships in the Middle East and kill their crews, some of the people familiar with the warnings said.

Iranian missiles came close to U.S. warships during attacks in September. The Pentagon moved a dozen B-1 bomber aircraft from a U.K. military base last week over concerns Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had planned a drone attack.

Direct fighting between the U.S. and Iran has largely been on hold since Trump called off plans for a major escalation in late July, partly because of concerns about supplies of missile interceptors needed to defend targets across the region, the Journal has reported.

Iran has used the pause to rebuild its missile and drone facilities and replenish its arsenal. Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei praised the work but acknowledged supply-chain struggles in early September comments published by news outlets linked to the Revolutionary Guard.

Iran has also reinforced protection around its nuclear sites and other security-related bunkers. Last month, it built passive defense measures such as makeshift dirt mounds around its Pickaxe Mountain and Natanz nuclear sites to impede any attempted raid by ground forces, according to Vantor satellite images analyzed by the Institute for Science and International Security, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit.

Iranian officials are touting their efforts. The country's airports, seaports and power plants "have prepared for wartime conditions," installing shelters and backup supplies to continue operating in a crisis, Brig. Gen. Gholamreza Jalali, the official in charge of the country's contingency plans, said at the end of September.

State media have also been broadcasting daily pro-regime gatherings. Iranian residents said the crowds have grown bigger and spread to more locations in recent weeks.

Billboards in Tehran now advertise civilian training courses in the use of shoulder-fired antiaircraft missiles and sniper rifles.

Last month, the Revolutionary Guard boasted it had trained its first female commando units in guerrilla tactics, firearms use and drone piloting, according to footage posted by the Fatehin, an elite unit of Iran's Basij volunteer defense forces.

In Sabzevar, a city in north-eastern Iran, a Revolutionary Guard unit visited a kindergarten and told the children stories about the fighting this year and displayed a U.S. Tomahawk missile the unit said it had neutralized, according to the social-media account of the guard's ground forces.

“In both word and deed, the Islamic Republic is actively preparing for the next war,” said Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the Iran program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington think tank.

Intelligence isn't the advantage. What you do with it is.

Every leadership team is confronting three connected questions:

How should we operate now?

How do we make better decisions, faster?

Where will our next phase of growth

come from?

Most businesses divide these questions across teams, tools, and partners.

Then they spend time, money, and momentum putting the answers back together.

PMG was built to connect them.

Our people bring the judgment. Our operating model carries decisions from strategy through execution. And Alli, our proprietary operating system, connects each decision to what happens next.

One accountable team. One connected system.

From the first question to the business outcome.

Operate smarter. Decide faster. Grow.

Europe defense expenditures as share of GDP in 2025, by country

Russia Hits Ukraine's Power Infrastructure

BY ANASTASIIA MALENKO

KYIV, Ukraine—Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Russian strikes hit energy infrastructure across his country hours after President Trump declared an energy ceasefire between the warring sides.

The Russian attacks—including on gas infrastructure, a power plant and a substation—come as the U.S. heaps pressure on Ukraine to stop striking Russian oil refineries, and after Trump moved to allow Russia to export diesel to the U.S. in a bid to drive down U.S. prices at the pump.

“Last night, Russian oil refineries were not burning. But at midnight, a Russian jet-powered Shahed struck a gas-production facility in Ukraine,” Zelensky said in an address to the Warsaw Security Forum on Monday. “And there was also a Russian strike on an ordinary gas station, involving several drones.”

Ukraine has long maintained that it would be prepared to halt drone and missile strikes on Russian oil facilities if Moscow stops its bombing campaign against Ukraine's energy infrastructure, which has caused widespread power cuts this fall.

Zelensky reiterated that pledge on Monday, adding that European and other leaders support that approach.

"If Russia wants us to stop our long-range strikes against its oil refineries and oil exports, then Russia must stop its strikes against our energy system and critical infrastructure. And stop killing our people," he said.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Monday he couldn't share any comments regarding the announced energy ceasefire as contacts continued, Russian state news agency TASS reported.

Overnight into Monday, a Russian jet-powered drone attack damaged equipment at a gas infrastructure facility in the Kharkiv region, said Ukrainian state oil-and-gas company Naftogaz.

Another attack damaged a power substation in the northern region of Zhytomyr, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha told journalists at a European Union foreign ministers meeting in Luxembourg.

“No one should believe Putin’s words. Look at his actions instead,” Sybiha said, reiterating Ukraine’s readiness for a reciprocal energy truce.

In an attempt to draw the attention of U.S. decision makers to what he called Russian violations, Zelensky said an effective energy ceasefire could be “a major step toward ending the war” if the U.S. steps in to ensure Moscow abides by it.

Expressing his frustration with Ukraine's campaign against Russian refineries and the continuing war, Trump has called for Zelensky to be replaced as leader.

"I think it's time for Ukraine to get a new president," Trump told reporters on Saturday, blaming Zelensky for the conflict that Russia started in 2022 and Kyiv's airstrikes for high diesel prices in the U.S. and worldwide.

Before this year's war between the U.S. and Iran, the Middle East was the world's top exporter of diesel, accounting for $19\%$ of global exports last year, according to commodities-tracking service Kpler. North America had a $15\%$ market share and Russia was the third-biggest supplier at $11\%$ .

Disruptions to diesel shipments from Persian Gulf countries, along with attacks by the Houthis on Saudi Arabia's Red Sea refineries, also have contributed to the rise in prices.

A man grieves after a Russian airstrike killed his wife in a residential area of Kharkiv.

---

EU Imposes Sanctions on Nearly 1,600 Russians, Firms

The European Union imposed sanctions Monday on nearly 1,600 Russians and companies linked to Moscow's arms industry, targeting those suspected of involvement in making parts for drones and missiles.

pied parts of Ukraine.

In the biggest single listing of sanctions since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the EU also targeted 77 people accused of organizing, working on, or running in “sham elections” in occu-

Announcing the sanctions, EU foreign-policy chief Kaja Kallas said more than half of them “address the production chain for the ballistic missiles Russia uses to kill Ukrainian civilians every day.

"This is not the time to ease pressure on Moscow but to increase it," she said.

The EU said the companies are on a list established by the Russian government itself “that identifies them as belonging to the Russian military-industrial complex, and they are therefore entitled to receive subsidies.” The EU considers those officials running the companies to be “supporting Russia’s military and industrial complex.” It said the sanctions are aimed at “mid-level suppliers that represent the ‘core’ of the Russian military industry.”

—Associated Press

Starving Ukrainians Risk Death to Escape Front-Line Town

Outside the U.S. Embassy in Warsaw protesters decry the humanitarian crisis in Russian-occupied Oleshky.

BY NIKITA NIKOLAIENKO

AND IAN LOVETT

Nearly two months passed without food deliveries to the Russian-occupied city of Oleshky when Maria Zakhavko decided she and her husband had to leave.

Before setting out, they dropped off the food they gathered for Zakhavko's elderly parents, who were too frail to make the 12-mile trek across mined and corpse-strewn roads to the next town. They had to wait for an evacuation—if one ever came.

“See you soon,” Zakhavko recalled saying, hopefully. On Aug. 17, she and her husband set off on the first leg of what would become a much longer journey to safety, aware that not everyone made the trip safely.

Once a city of 24,000 people on the southern bank of the Dnipro River, Oleshky is now at the center of a humanitarian crisis.

All year, food supplies have dwindled as mines and drones made the road impassable, cutting contact between Oleshky and the outside world. The last volunteers bringing food arrived in May. After that, residents said, several vehicles hit land mines and the volunteers stopped coming.

Roughly 2,000 civilians are effectively trapped in Oleshky, said Ukrainian officials, who maintain contact with residents by phone. The city has been under Russian control since the first days of the 2022 invasion.

The remaining residents live off vegetables they grow, soups of boiled weeds and cans of food they scavenge from abandoned homes. Some periodically make the harrowing 25-mile round-trip journey deeper into Russian territory to Radensk, the nearest town where they can buy supplies. The road is impassable for cars, but can be traversed—at great risk—by foot or bicycle.

Ukrainian troops occasionally deliver food and other supplies by drone from across the river, but Ukrainian officials say Russian forces sometimes intercept the packages, or punish those caught receiving them. Russian troops also move into locals' apartments and eat whatever they find, say residents who have left.

"The Russians are essentially using these civilians as a human shield," said Oleksandr Tolokonnikov, deputy head of Ukraine's Kherson Regional Military Administration. "By remaining behind civilians, it makes it easier for them to shell our side of the river. They don't even feed them—we send food ourselves, and risk losing drones." Each drone used for food deliveries, he said, costs roughly \$22,000.

In an email to The Wall Street Journal, the Kremlin said there were only 200 civilians in Oleshky, and that Ukraine was preventing them from leaving and blocking food and water deliveries. "The Russian army continues to deliver supplies there."

Life in Oleshky, located across the Dnipro River from Kherson, has been difficult for much of the occupation. In 2023, Russians blew a nearby dam, submerging much of the city in water and washing land mines and other munitions into residential areas.

Russian troops moved into the city, and Ukrainian forces shelled it. Electricity, water and gas were cut. Most residents left. Those who stayed, most of them elderly, got used to cooking over open fires in their courtyards and the sound of drones buzzing overhead.

Last winter, food began to run low as fewer volunteers braved the road to deliver supplies. At the small market, prices skyrocketed—\$17 for a dozen eggs, say residents. After the volunteers stopped coming, the search for food grew desperate.

Olena Solovyova, 50 years old, said her father in Oleshky moved in with a neighbor last winter—his house had no wood-burning stove, so he had no way to heat it when the gas was cut.

As food ran low during the summer, she said, he decided to make the journey by bicycle to Radensk. He repaired the bike and set off with a group who knew the way. The trip back took six hours, because he was walking with 70 pounds of food—though there was no meat available to buy.

“He said drones were flying overhead the entire time,” Solovyova said. The road has since been more heavily mined, she said, and several residents who tried to make the trip in September were killed. It is unclear whether Ukrainian or Russian forces are laying the mines.

Since last week, Ukrainian forces delivered roughly 10 tons of food and other supplies by drone.

Tetiana Hasanenko, the head of Oleshky's city military administration, who is based in Ukrainian-held territory, said the missions weren't announced beforehand, but officials messaged some residents privately that the shipments were coming. In the past, Russian forces tried to intercept the drones.

Oleshky's hospital remains open, but is short of medicine and other supplies.

Solovyova said a former teacher of hers, who remains in Oleshky, was injured by shrapnel in September. She was taken to the hospital, but doctors lacked supplies to stop the bleeding and ultimately had to amputate the leg. "The basement is full of bodies," she said of the hospital.

Zakhavko and her husband are among the most recent residents to make it safely out of Oleshky. “I worry about my parents constantly now,” she said. “There are hundreds of people there who simply aren’t capable of leaving.”

NATO Military Chief Lays Out Plan Designed to Thwart Moscow

Reported Russian-linked incidents from March 2021 to September 2026

\- Drone/airspace incursions

  • Sabotage
  • Espionage
  • Cyberattack/electronic warfare
  • NATO member states

\*Luxembourg's defense expenditure is calculated as a percent of Gross National Income.

Sources: Center for European Policy Analysis (incidents);

EDA defense data portal (expenditures) DANIEL KISS/WSJ

NATO's top military commander sought Monday to steady an anxious Europe, outlining the alliance's new military plan to thwart a potential Russian assault along its eastern flank with a mix of firepower, autonomous systems and sensors that borrows from the lessons of Ukraine.

---

By Michael R. Gordon, Robbie Gramer and Daniel Michaels

The speech by Gen. Alexus Grynkewich on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's "theory of victory" outlined a series of steps to block an initial attack and, if aggression continues, break the adversary's ability to control and support its forces.

The goal would be to stop the invasion in its tracks while minimizing the risk of conventional or nuclear escalation by stopping short of the complete destruction of the enemy.

Speaking onstage after his address at the Warsaw Security Forum, Grynkewich said he presented the strategy both to reassure Europeans made nervous by Russian aggression and to send a message “should someone be foolish enough to try to attack our territory.”

Grynkewich, a U.S. Air Force general who serves as both the head of American forces in Europe and the alliance's top commander, delivered the speech in Poland, a U.S. ally that has been worried about Russian President Vladimir Putin's intentions toward

Europe as the conflict in Ukraine enters its fifth year.

While Grynkewich outlined his veiled warnings to Moscow—which he didn't identify by name in his speech—President Trump's weekend pronouncements left European allies and U.S. lawmakers reeling.

“Outlining military plans is important, but it can’t be divorced from addressing what everyone is worried about: Trump’s outbursts, Russia’s war on Ukraine and threats to Europe, and questions on whether we’re pulling significant U.S. forces out of Europe,” said Kurt Volker, a former U.S. envoy to NATO and later to Ukraine under the first Trump administration.

Some Republican lawmakers have criticized Trump over a deal, which he announced over the weekend, to import Russian diesel fuel, warning it hands Moscow financial assistance without making a significant dent in U.S. energy prices. Shortly after Trump announced the energy ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, Russian forces attacked a power plant in the Ukrainian city of Kharkiv.

That Grynkewich's reassurance was needed at all marks a turnabout for an alliance that once believed it had won the Cold War and harvested a peace dividend. Instead, NATO faces a bellicose Russia that has invaded Ukraine, penetrated Western airspace with drones and is suspected of carrying out sabotage attacks on infrastructure, military equipment and defense companies in Europe.

The “shadow warfare,” as it

was dubbed recently by a senior German intelligence official, has unnerved Western officials, who have struggled to develop an effective strategy to deter Russia's hybrid warfare and who are preparing to defend against the possibility of more substantial attacks against NATO's Baltic members and its eastern frontier.

Grynkewich said a classified version of his plan had been finalized three months ago and it called for investing in “affordable mass,” a reference to the relatively cheap drones Ukraine has used to complement the alliance’s arsenal of more sophisticated weapons.

If Russia attacked, the alliance's first goal would be to block the initial assault and prevent any advances if it continues. In carrying out such a strategy, the NATO commander indicated the alliance would not be seeking to vanquish Russia or undermine its government. "We are not seeking to impose a strategic defeat on our adversary," he said. "Rather, we are only seeking to stop any attack in its tracks."

Grynkewich didn't provide a timetable for stiffening the defenses. The alliance's efforts are taking place against the background of munitions shortages in Europe of American PAC-3 Patriot air defense interceptors and Atacms surface-to-surface missiles, as U.S. munitions have been funneled to the Middle East to contend with Iran.

NATO's “theory of victory” draws on the efforts of retired Gen. Chris Donahue, the former U.S. Army commander in Europe and head of the alliance's Land Command, who was forced out of his post in July when Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth downgraded his post.

Under its strategy, an “autonomous zone” would be established so that drones and ground robots could blunt a Russian attack without extensive allied casualties.

At the same time, long-range missiles would strike Russian command posts and air defenses in the exclave of Kaliningrad, near St. Petersburg and in Belarus. That would puncture Russia's efforts to control the skies and enable the U.S. Army's V Corps and other NATO ground forces to counterattack.

NATO air forces would move to strike Russian reinforcements as they streamed toward the battlefield and to attack other targets in the rear.

Some veteran officials hailed NATO's efforts to update its strategy, but said the test for the alliance would be committing the resources to put it fully in place.

“It is great that NATO is through this adaptation, but they have to hurry. And nations have to come through with the money and the political will to do this,” said Jim Townsend, who served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for Europe and NATO during the Obama administration. “NATO as an institution can do the planning, but it is the members who are going to have to go home, spend the money and train the troops.”

New from #1 New York Times Bestselling Author

BRIAN KILMEADE

SIX MOMENTS.

ONE MIRACLE.

250 YEARS IN THE MAKING.

“Brian Kilmeade provides us with a variation of Profiles in Courage focused on our Founders. . . . These half dozen men helped unify our country and establish our narrative of striving for a more perfect union.”

#1 New York Times bestselling author of Elon Musk

"Fascinating, intriguing, heart-pounding; history the way it should be! . . . Reminds us that the character of great Americans has always shined through—and always will."

Admiral, U.S. Navy (Retired), #1 New York Times bestselling author of Make Your Bed

"Uniting the States will inspire you, showing you the power of ordinary people doing the extraordinary."

#1 bestselling author of The JFK Conspiracy

#1 NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLING AUTHOR #1 NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLING

BRIAN KILMEADE

UNITING

the

STATES

SIX CRUCIAL MOMENTS THAT FORGED the AMERICAN MIRACLE

AVAILABLE NOW

WHEREVER BOOKS ARE SOLD

Discover Great Books, Exclusive Offers, and More at HC.com

WM MORROW

An Imprint of HarperCollins Publishers

Venezuelans Ponder Oil Future

Continued from Page One zuela's oil sector will be a lengthy undertaking costing hundreds of billions of dollars.

Ten months after Maduro's ouster, little of the investment has flowed in. National oil production has hovered just above a million barrels a day since January, up from 500,000 a day in 2020 after U.S. sanctions began to bite but far below the more than 3.2 million barrels a day produced in the late 1990s.

U.S. officials said change is on the horizon. At a recent packed conference of foreign investors in Venezuela's capital, Caracas, Michael Garcia, deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy, pointed to deals involving Chevron and power-equipment firm GE Vernova as evidence that an alliance with

The conference, another in a string of events marking Venezuela's reopening after years of economic isolation and U.S. sanctions, brought more than 650 executives from international energy companies together.

There was little disagreement over the business potential in a country sitting on some of the world's largest oil and gas reserves. "Venezuela has more crown jewels than the Tower of London," said Hunter Hunt, chief executive of Texas wildcatter Hunt Energy.

Maduro's former deputy, acting President Delcy Rodríguez, was reviving the oil sector and shoring up a shaky national electrical grid. "Real work remains," Garcia said. "But the direction is unmistakable."

Panelists at the three-day conference were asked to keep discussions technical and apolitical, leaving Venezuela's political future unaddressed. Polls show growing discontent with Rodríguez's unelected interim administration, a potential obstacle to long-term investment. Small protests have broken out nationwide in recent weeks, with demonstrators blocking roads to demand elections.

A fallen power transmission tower rests on an inactive oil pumpjack on Lake Maracaibo in Cabimas, Venezuela.

Executives at the conference listed the challenges to ramping up output: power cuts, a small pool of experienced contractors, and the difficulty of securing project financing while navigating a web of U.S. sanctions. Only a third of the 30,000 wells in the country is active after almost eight years of international blacklisting that kept new technologies from entering, said

William Antonio, managing director for Mexico, Central America and Venezuela at SLB, an energy-services firm formerly known as Schlumberger.

The return of U.S. investors to Venezuela has also revived old political grievances. Jorge Giordani, a Marxist and former chief economic planner in Venezuela's government, told a gathering of leftist activists in Caracas that capitalists are trying to steal "the devil's excrement," the enormous oil wealth long seen as a blessing and curse in the country.

“They’re back,” the 86-year-old said. “And they’re only interested in one thing: our hydrocarbons.”

Lucila Nava, a retired secretary whose father had worked for 40 years at Shell and who lives near Lake Maracaibo, said she was frustrated that the U.S. supported Rodríguez and kept Maduro's authoritarian government intact as foreign companies secured lucrative contracts.

“We liked [President] Trump when he took out Maduro,” Nava said. “But you can’t just take away oil like this. We get it, the U.S. is the biggest power in the world. But that doesn’t give you the right to do something like this.”

Executives hope brownfields—as mature fields are called—can be quickly rejuvenated. Several of the 17 oil blocs recently acquired by private Venezuelan firm North American Blue Energy Partners in a venture with the Pentagon are also here.

People try to be resourceful with what is left of the oil industry. In Cabimas, a group of neighbors tap a pump jack for natural gas and pipe it into their kitchens. At times, oil seeps through the rudimentary pipework, sending the black goo into the kitchen.

Security guard Elmo Quintero said he had hoped that after Maduro's overthrow, his three children in Colombia could return home and the decrepit health system would improve. A diabetic, the 65-year-old said he couldn't afford insulin and the local clinic rarely has syringes. He self-medicates with a concoction of herbal tea.

Quintero helps maintain a rusted pump jack for the state oil company, Petróleos de Venezuela, on a patio adjacent to his brick shack. His chickens feed between pipelines. Water service is available for a couple of days every three months. As he spoke, the pump jack ground to a halt behind him—another power failure. He was doubtful he would see an improvement in his lifetime.

“I’m thinking more about my grandchildren,” Quintero said.

Ballooning British Welfare

Not including healthcare, the country will spend more than £100 billion this year on all types of welfare benefits for the sick and disabled, about a third more than defense spending. The tab has surged by a quarter in just four years and is on course to hit £130 billion in the next four, according to the government's fiscal forecasts.

Some seven million people—more than 10% of the population—now claim at least one or more sickness or disability benefits. The numbers are growing fastest among working-age people who should be powering the economy, surging more than 60% in the past six years to 4.7 million from 2.9 million in 2019.

Continued from Page One

Many of the newer disability claims are for mental-health issues which can be harder for the government to verify.

Total number of Brits granted personal independence payments by select type $^{†}$

U.K. borrowing costs are higher than any country in the Group of Seven, recently hitting their highest level since the 2008 financial crisis. A slow but steady exodus of wealthy Brits has shown there are limits to how much the government can keep raising the tax burden, already at its highest level since World War II.

One benefit, created to help those with disabilities be more mobile, allows people to give up part of their welfare cash handout in return for a new car lease every three years. It now accounts for around one in every seven new car sales in the U.K. Among those who got new cars last year: 40 people whose primary medical condition was tennis elbow, 50 with wheat intolerance and 320 with dyslexia, according to government figures.

The surge in welfare spending is “clearly not sustainable on any level,” says David Coombs, head of multiasset investments at U.K. fund manager Rathbones. “It really is the big issue of the moment.”

Current yields on 10-year government debt for G-7 countries\*\*

Borrowing costs on Britain's 10-year bonds have risen to $5.5\%$ from $4.5\%$ at the start of the year, adding a few extra billion pounds to the country's

U.K. benefit expenditure to support disabled people and people with health conditions, by age group $^{4}$

It's also a litmus test of a pressing question facing the West: Is it possible for political leaders to rein in spending on ever expanding welfare states? So far, the answer seems to be no, increasing the chances that countries like Britain are inching toward a financial reckoning.

Yield on 10-year government debt for U.K.\*\*

The U.K., like its European peers, is caught in a vicious cycle. Its spending is surging thanks to an aging population, greater defense needs, a costly green-energy transition and the swelling bill for welfare and debt interest. But its income is mostly flat, with weak economic growth.

The government has raised taxes and binged on debt, borrowing an extra £1 trillion since the pandemic. That strategy is running out of road.

The scale of the payout has become a scandal. No other western country has seen such a rise in disability claims.

\*In nominal terms; Fiscal years end March 31; £1=\$1.32 †Cumulative data \*Data shows spending on benefits for disabled people, people with health conditions and their carers \*\*As of Friday 5:30 a.m. ET Sources: Department for Work and Pensions (spending, payments, expenditure); Tullett Prebon (yields)

---

'Not sustainable'

In 2025, then U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced plans to tighten eligibility requirements for sickness and disability welfare in a bid to shave £5 billion a year off government spending by 2030.

The backlash was so sharp Starmer abandoned the cuts. Investors, spooked that a government with a big majority couldn't push through such a reform, sold off government bonds, the pound fell sharply and the Chancellor of the Exchequer cried in Parliament.

Starmer was later ditched by the Labour Party, replaced this summer by the telegenic Andy Burnham, who has also pledged to deal with welfare—but not through what he calls “crude cuts.”

But across Europe, attempts to change the social safety net is proving politically toxic. In France, attempts to trim spending on entitlements led the National Assembly to oust two previous prime ministers. After Germany passed some modest changes to its unemployment and health benefits, furious voters have punished the ruling center-right party.

running costs. The U.K. is paying more for its debt than spendthrift France or historical basket cases like Greece.

The U.K.'s youth inactivity rate used to be middle of the pack in Europe. By last year, only Romania recorded a higher rate of young people not in employment, education or training. "I think there's a lack of understanding about how unskilled some of the most disadvantaged people are in Britain and that actually we would be much better off investing in their skills than just giving welfare," says Alun Francis, the chair of the U.K. Social Mobility Commission, an independent body.

Burnham will unveil his first budget later this month and is widely expected to include fresh tax hikes, which could

Across the European Union, government welfare spending has steadily grown from just 10% of economic output in the early 1960s to an average of 27% today, compared with about 21% in the U.S.

videos," he says.

Government officials are considering ways to tighten eligibility for young people and instead pay for extra training to get them into work. The Department for Work and Pensions says it's spending a further £3.5 billion toward helping those with disabilities get jobs.

Disability and sickness payments in the U.K. show how the system sprawls.

---

Mission creep

Britain's postwar government introduced disability payments to help offset lost wages for, say, a worker who lost a hand in an industrial accident. But over time, the system grew into an alphabet soup of programs. Some are aimed at people who are too sick to work. Others are broader: Personal independence payments are a cash handout for anyone—rich or poor, working or not—who has an illness or disability to help cover higher living costs.

When the benefit's precursor was created in the 1990s, the government thought a few hundred thousand would claim. Today one in every 12 people is getting disability checks. The program now covers people living with a range of physical and mental health issues, including anxiety, ADHD, depression and even acne.

"People aren't working around here because they can get on PIP, so they sit around and do drugs and drink," says Stephen Walker, 65, as he strolls through Walton on a recent day. "It's unfair."

things it was not intended to do," says Paul Johnson, an expert in fiscal issues at the University of Oxford.

In deprived areas, particularly former industrial centers, a significant number of residents depend on welfare. In Walton, a Liverpool suburb, around 1 in 2 households claim welfare, and 1 in 5 working-age residents claim PIP.

He acknowledges some do need the help—including three of his grandchildren. But he says too many use it to top up their income.

“I think people broadly agree the system is now doing meet thanks to subsidized housing and unemployment benefits of about £650 a month.

Charities say the welfare payments are a relief for people who've seen food and heating costs soar. "People don't just come in and go, oh, you know, 'Jackpot. I've got an ADHD diagnosis. Gimme, gimme, gimme.' It doesn't work like that," says Mick Blakeley, head of operational development at Citizens Advice Liverpool.

Eleonore Paxman's three children are all on disability welfare. Noelle, 31, has Type 1 diabetes, retinopathy and ADHD. Coco, 18, has autism and OCD, and Benjamin, 15, has pathological demand avoidance and ADHD.

Paxman, 52, says the money has been a godsend, especially after her husband went deaf and lost his job as a music arranger. She gave up work to home-school her two youngest children, which the couple felt was necessary after Benjamin spiraled when he first went to school in their London suburb.

“Without the help, we’d be in big trouble,” she says.

Recently, Price was classified as suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder after experiencing abuse growing up in foster care. She now gets an extra £300 a month in PIP payments to cover costs related to her condition.

While the system genuinely helps people in need, it is also open to abuse. The claims don't need a doctor's backing; they are based on whether a person can carry out a range of everyday activities.

“You get knocked back and then the only way you can support yourself is by claiming benefits,” she says.

A cottage industry of charities and consultancies have cropped up to help claimants navigate the benefits claim system, which can be both byzantine and, critics say, gamable. On average nearly 1,000 people a day are being put on PIP, according to government figures.

---

'Knocked back'

The problem for the British state is that the pool of people who could claim PIP is huge. A government survey published in 2024 found that a quarter of working-age Brits could be technically classed as disabled.

The financial incentives to claim are significant. For example, a young person living outside London can claim around £900 a month on unemploy-

---

A gateway

A short drive from Walton, Roy Pearman is reaping the fruits of PIP at the car dealership where he works.

Tony Shepherd, who oversees the Liverpool charity St Andrew's Community Network, says the government has built a conveyor belt for getting people on welfare, with little help to get them off again. There's a long waiting list for things like state-funded mental-health support that could help people get back to work, he says. There's also a lack of jobs.

Customers who get PIP and are classed as having limited mobility can lease a car for no cash upfront—they simply forgo about £320 a month of “enhanced mobility” allowance. Included in the lease that the government pays for are all road taxes, insurance and car servicing. The car can be swapped in for a new vehicle every three years.

It doesn't go well for everyone. Wieland, the Cancun vacationer, pleaded guilty to fraud earlier this year and has to give back some £23,000. Her lawyer told the court Wieland didn't realize that receiving the payments meant she wasn't allowed to actually go outside.

The business that provides the vehicles, Motability, is now the country's biggest car-leasing company. Last year 860,000 people in the country had a Motability car. “The scheme exists because there is a real market failure which we solve,” Motability Operations CEO Andrew Miller says.

At the dealership, some 60% of the Fords and high-end BYD electric cars sold are Motability. “There is nothing like it anywhere else in the world,” Pearman says.

PIP is particularly valuable because it is a gateway to other incapacity payments and can remove a cap on the total amount of unemployment or housing benefits a family can claim.

“It’s a sticking plaster,” he says, using the English term for Band-Aid.

put Britain's finances on firmer footing but will further crimp economic growth.

OMINIC WHISSON FOR WSJ

If the government wants to gain investor trust and lower borrowing costs, it needs to show it can make politically painful spending cuts to areas like welfare, says Andy Haldane, a former chief economist at the Bank of England and ex Burnham adviser. “The market now suspects that this is a traditional tax-and-spend socialist government with better TikTok ment and housing benefits. If they are classified as being too sick to work and also claim PIP, that increases to around £2,000, tax free. If you work 40 hours a week in a minimum-wage job in the U.K., you take home £1,880 a month after tax.

In Walton, a significant number of residents depend on welfare.

Standing on Walton's main street near a fried chicken shop, Morgan Price, 22, is one of a million young Brits who aren't in school, don't have a job and aren't training for one. Price and her boyfriend make ends

PERSONAL JOURNAL.

© 2026 Dow Jones & Company. All Rights Reserved.

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.

How to Spot Signals Of Early Estrangement

Research shows that pullback from parents often begins gradually. Recognizing the stages can help with reconciliation, therapists say.

Rutgers University Professor Kristina Scharp studies estrangement.

ELIZABETH

BERNSTEIN

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

W hen I interview parents who are estranged from their adult children, many say: "My child cut me

off out of the blue. I didn't see it coming."

Yet people who have gone “no contact” with their parents often tell me that this decision was their last resort—and a long time coming.

Why the disconnect?

Estrangement typically occurs on a continuum—and parents don't always recognize the signs, says Kristina Scharp, a communication professor at Rutgers University who studies the issue. Think of a scale from one to 10, where 10 is full contact between parent and child and one is none. In between, there is a slow pullback: fewer calls and visits, less access granted.

“It’s a myth that estrangement is always all or nothing,” Scharp says.

Scharp identified eight characteristics of estrangement, or areas in which adult children who are pulling away from their parents change their behaviors or feelings:

Communication quantity: They reduce the amount of contact. In a less-severe estrangement, they might call from time to time. In a more severe case, there is no contact.

Communication quality: They stop sharing meaningful or personal information. Instead of talking about their job or partner, for example, they might talk about the weather.

move away or stay away. Some might remain in touch. Others move and don't tell their parents where they live.

Presence or absence of emotion: The amount of emotion that they feel for their parent changes. Some are flooded with anger or devastation. Others report feeling numb.

Positive or negative affect: The flavor of emotion changes, often becoming more negative as the child becomes more estranged. For example, someone might go from feeling that their mom is difficult to resenting or even hating her.

Desire for reconciliation: The wish to remain in the family changes. Some decide to cut ties. Others hold out hope that the relationship can be repaired if certain parental behaviors change.

Role reciprocity: They no longer think their parents are behaving the way a mom and dad should.

And they stop behaving as a child might be expected to toward a parent. For instance, they may refuse to visit when a parent is sick or even dying.

Legal action: They formally sever ties with a parent, like changing their name or beneficiaries in their will.

All of these behaviors occur on a spectrum, and not all are at play

Joe Bernstein says he tried different approaches with his father before blocking him.

in every estrangement, Scharp says. People may also fluctuate, moving closer—or away—from a parent at different times.

If parents understand this, they may be able to improve the relationship. “The continuum is where the compromise can exist,” Scharp says.

On Reddit, commenters share strategies on how to pull back from parents: respond to every other call or text; return calls when you know your parents will be busy; request that they stop asking about you; and start “grey rocking,” which is to deliberately make your communication as dull and unresponsive as, well, a grey rock.

ways tell their parents. Even when they do, parents sometimes resist the boundaries their children are trying to set. Meanwhile, parents may mistake the pullback as a natural developmental phase, realizing the scope only in hindsight.

Yet people who are pulling away don't al-

"The final cutoff is the undeniable writing on the wall," says Jennifer Hershon, a family-es-

trangement coach in Sacramento. "But there's room for repair before the pattern is entrenched."

Joe Bernstein, 51 years old, spent decades trying to set boundaries with his dad after what he described as an adverse childhood. First, he tried talking to his father less. Then when he got married and had a child, he stopped sharing news of his family and refused to allow get-togethers. He also tried to actively put his dad out of his mind.

But none of this made him feel better, Bernstein says. He still had flashbacks about incidents in his childhood. He felt consumed by anger. And the more he pulled away, the more his father pushed back, he says.

Then three years ago, Bernstein started therapy, which helped him process his feelings. When his dad later criticized this, Bernstein says he responded by blocking his father.

“This gives me the quantum of solace to step back and sit more peacefully with the situation,” says Bernstein, a higher-education administrator in Chicago. “And it leads to even a sense of compassion for him because he had a rough childhood, too.”

As for a potential reconciliation, Bernstein says he would welcome it if his father was able to treat him with respect and civility. "That would be the better outcome," he says. "Because ending things in darkness isn't good for anyone."

What can estranged parents and children do to bridge the divide?

Not all people who have pulled away or cut off a parent may want to reconnect. If they were abused, for example, it may be safer to stay away.

Yet many estrangements are caused by communication or boundary issues. In these instances, therapists recommend parents and kids who want to repair the relationship meet in a neutral setting, like a restaurant, to talk. The adult child should acknowledge that they are pulling away—and focus on patterns, not individual incidents, when they explain what is wrong.

Parents should have a notebook with them, says Catherine Hickem, a psychotherapist in Atlanta who specializes in parent-adult child relationships. She recommends that parents tell their child: “I realize I have made some mistakes that have hurt you and I want to hear about all of them.”

It is important for parents not to be defensive, try to explain themselves or justify their actions, Hickem says. They should listen. Tell their child that they appreciate the courage it took to tell the truth. And promise to work to change their behavior.

Then the parent should take a few days to reflect on what they heard, call their child back and keep the dialogue going.

“Repair is not this fully cathartic moment,” says Rachel Haack, a licensed marriage and family therapist in Reno, Nev., who works with families dealing with estrangement. “It’s staying connected through the distance.”

United Targets Rivals With 'Status Match'

BY DAWN GILBERTSON

The following items first appeared in the weekly Travel newsletter.

You probably have heard about the kerfuffle between Delta and Elon Musk after the airline passed on Starlink service in favor of Amazon. United seized the moment to tout its Starlink service by going after Delta (and American) frequent fliers. It did so with something called a status match.

Not familiar? Here's how it works. If you have status on one airline, you can apply to instantly get the same level at a competing airline, temporarily at least. Airlines often run status-match promotions to get frequent fliers to switch sides or at least try the competition.

Sometimes, they match your status plus one. American Airlines offered such a promotion through our corporate travel department in August. I have A List status on Southwest Airlines so applied by providing proof. Soon after, I was granted Platinum status on American through Dec 16. (Gold is American's

through Dec. 16. (Gold Is American's base level.) The status has already given me free extra-legroom seats, checked bags, priority boarding and bonus miles. No upgrades yet.

Here's the catch: You have to rack up a certain number of loyalty points by the deadline to keep the status. You earn these by flying or spending money with one of the airline's partners and by using one of its credit cards. (I signed up for one of American's low-fee credit cards to help the cause and cash in on a welcome bonus.)

To keep platinum through March 2028, I need to rack up 25,000 loyalty points from the start of the challenge. I've earned 11,255 so far.

That might be out of reach even with two American flights coming up, including a flight in economy to Europe. But I've already reached the threshold for Gold (10,000 loyalty points), so that's a small win. The promotion does have me using American more, a win for the airline.

You don't have to have a corporate agency to be eligible for a status match. The latest United one targets Delta and American fliers, but there's been a promotion running all year. So if you're holding status in an airline and want to play the field, reach out to that airline's frequent-flier program.

Delta and American fliers have until Oct. 15 to match during United's Starlink promotion. Once approved, you have to spend between \$1,500 and \$7,000 and fly within 90 days to keep the status.

Notes from the road

▶ Good news for you Newark fliers: American Express now plans a

Airlines like United lure travelers with temporary status promotions.

30,000-square-foot lounge, its largest, in Terminal A. The original plans called for an 18,000-square-foot lounge. (Those plans also called for it to open this year; the bigger lounge will debut in 2027.) Amex couldn't resist a jab at the other credit-card companies nipping at its lounge heels: It will be the only operator with outlets at the three major New York airports. Amex also announced the addition of a second lounge at London's Heathrow.

▶ American Airlines is promising a lounge glow-up at its Charlotte, N.C., hub with plans for a new 40,000-square-foot Admirals Club. The lounge is due to open in 2028.

Separately, American plans to install Starlink Wi-Fi service on all of its 1,000 mainline jets, up from the 500 it announced earlier this year.

---

One good tip

Hate stalking the airline seat map for a better seat ahead of your flight like it's a part-time job? American Airlines will now automatically search for a seat in the same cabin if you opt into a new feature on its app after booking a flight and do so at least 24 hours before departure. It's called automatic seat change. You pick aisle, middle or window and whether you only want to move to seats closer to the front. Don't like bulkhead seats? Don't check that box. Exit row seats are excluded. The airline says passengers are accommodated based on their frequent-flier status and when they signed up for the seat-change option. United Airlines unveiled a similar feature earlier this year.

---

Travel Math: \$500 million

That's ticket sales for "The Wizard of Oz" at the Sphere in Las Vegas since its debut in August 2025. Some analysts are worried, though, that demand is cooling despite new features including 4D effects.

Cheers and Jeers

Cheers to Southwest Airlines for a new-to-me feature. In the help center on its app, there's a "We'll call you" feature under "Need more assistance?" You just type in your name and phone number and you get a call back. (This is different from calling a company and being offered the option for a call back during long waits.) A Southwest rep called me back almost instantly and was able to quickly clear up a seat-assignment issue.

Big jeers to hotels where front-desk clerks greet you not with a warm hello, but a rote, "ID and credit card, please." No different than those doctors' offices that ask you for your ID and insurance card as soon you approach the counter. In my experience, it happens too often regardless of a hotel's daily rate and sets the wrong mood for the stay.

To subscribe to this newsletter, go to wsj.com/newsletters.

Climate Expert Disaster-Proofs Her Own Home

NYU researcher says every homeowner should think about preparing for extreme weather

BY AMY MYERS JAFFE

When it comes to my home, I get obsessive about climate risk. I come by the caution naturally.

For one thing, it is my job, as an energy and sustainability expert at New York University who has studied U.S. climate resilience under a grant from NASA.

But I have also had to deal with many extreme-weather events while living in climate-stressed places. At the end of September, in fact, a powerful nor'easter toppled a huge tree on my property, thankfully missing my house. Meanwhile, just weeks before, the sump pump in my basement was working overtime in the teeth of torrential rains.

It was the latest in a long string of extreme weather events I have lived through. One time in Houston, a hurricane turned so suddenly toward the city that we couldn't evacuate safely in time. Awaiting the landfall, we slept upstairs with a life raft, axes and an emergency weather radio, in case we had to escape through the roof. Luckily, water never got past our front lawn, but we lost electricity for more than five weeks.

In Davis, Calif., the transformer on my block repeatedly blew up during heat waves, leaving us sweltering, sometimes for days. Worse still, we were all constantly sick from breathing in the smoke from nearby wildfires. The blazes never reached Davis itself, but sometimes they kept me from commuting home when I was working in my office in Oakland.

I was also in New Haven, Conn., during the famous Snowmageddon that dropped 108.6 inches of snow on Boston in a single winter. It also brought polar-vortex cold—and my rental house had ridiculously thin window glass and poor

at least some thought to climate issues, especially as a warming planet makes extreme-weather events more likely and potentially more intense.

No matter where you live, chances are climate preparation is worth considering. I was part of a team whose research shows that extreme heat and rainfall have already intensified in many parts of the U.S., and some of the worst future severe weather events are going to come in places that haven't had such an event to date.

Here's what I picked for my current home based on experiences I've lived through:

---

Flood and fire risk

In a climate-challenged environment, being close to the nearest food store, pharmacy or emergency room, if possible, is beneficial. So, I selected a property that wouldn't leave me isolated in a crisis. The hill we live on is walkable to town, which means I can get to a grocery store and commuter rail no matter how much snow without using my car.

Living on a hill also makes a difference. My street doesn't have a propensity to flooding and sea-level rise won't affect my real-estate value or insurance rates over time, based on 2050 flood maps—a widely used reference. My driveway also has drains built into it. That matters not only for repeated downpours but for melting snow.

What's more, I nixed anywhere with high wildfire risk, as well as any property that borders forestland. I love to hike in nature preserves, but don't want them as my next-door neighbors.

Then there's the majestic white oak tree that stood as a stately landmark on our property just weeks ago. It looked magical—like something that might talk to small children in a Disney movie—and I truly loved it. But as part of my

disaster planning, I took some steps that were sad at the time, but maybe saved my house.

Early on, I consulted an arborist. We trimmed the canopy—this needs to be done regularly—so it would be less apt to catch the wind, and cut back branches that had the highest risk of falling on the house during a storm.

At the suggestion of the arborist, we had the tree's main limbs secured by industrial wiring that prevented them from swinging too wildly. The strategy worked for countless previous storms but not the latest one. But who knows what kind of damage the now-downed branches might have done otherwise.

Keeping the lights on

The way the climate is going,

backup generators or batteries are

worth having. My house came al-

ready equipped with a full-to-

scale, whole-home generator. I learned the hard way how important one of these can be, when a two-minute cyclone tornado came ashore Long Island Sound a few years ago and hit a major transmission line. Friends and neighbors were in the dark for weeks with no refrigeration or modern conveniences. I hate to brag, but in addition to being able to see at night, we could take a hot shower and prepare a home-cooked meal.

The most reliable fuel for a home-generator backup system varies depending on where a person lives. My general expert opinion is rooftop solar plus battery. But rooftop solar can be expensive to install on an existing home, and not every roof is amenable. My house has gables and skylights, so surface area for solar is limited.

We currently use propane in our generator and, so far, supplies haven't been a problem, regardless

Amy Myers Jaffe stands beside her uprooted tree.

of the weather. Many Houstonians have home diesel generators, but I don't recommend that. Diesel supply chains often get disrupted in extreme weather, and diesel generators can be finicky if they have been sitting dormant.

We also have a way to stay mobile in an emergency: our electric vehicle. I know this sounds counterintuitive, but based on my experience, an EV with a home charger and a backup generator is better than a gasoline car for storm resistance. Remember, gasoline can't be pumped without electricity. In blackouts, EV owners often do better than their friends and neighbors with regular cars for local driving.

Playing defense In today's downpours, you must have an automated sump pump for the basement. Originally, we had ours hooked up to a battery system—then the battery failed during a bad storm. Now we have the pump connected to our home electricity network, which has

proved to be reliable, given our generator. Earlier this month, the pump held up against a deluge of rain that brought about 7 inches over just a couple of hours.

That is also a reminder: In today's changing climate, you can never be too careful about what you stick in your basement. Whatever it might be, it needs to be stored on shelves off the ground. We also have the whole basement and crawl spaces covered in mold-protecting wall covering. That is also a must for post-flooding cleanup, should the worst happen.

To keep our electronics safe, we have a whole-house surge protector, which filters out sudden electrical spikes in the grid that can harm our appliances. I learned my lesson after a heat wave in Davis, Calif.: A power surge from an exploding transformer fried the circuit board of my refrigerator.

window glass and poor insulation.

So maybe it isn't all that surprising that before my husband and I bought my dream home in southern Connecticut, I made sure my place would be as climate-proof as possible.

Most people will find some of the measures I've taken excessive (my family does at times). But I believe every home buyer should give

A tree-removal crew clears the downed oak. Far right, one of the many air-filtration units inside Jaffe's home.

Charming as it is, we don't use the fireplace regularly. (We have blocked off three others for weatherizing purposes.) One of my climate obsessions, post-California, is clean indoor air, which rules out burning wood inside the house.

My current home is also stocked with multistage, HEPA-filter air purifiers that combine carbon absorption and ionizer technology, which came in handy during Covid. We could isolate someone and keep everyone else uninfected. Here in New England, they are also proving useful in combating Canadian wildfire smoke.

Climate tech can be useful, no matter your thinking about global climate trends or the climate risk in your area. Your family might grouse about all these precautions, but in the end, they will be thankful for the results.

Holy Grail Collectibles: Amenity Kits

Continued from Page One

airline memorabilia. They tuck them away in storage, waiting for the next flight or a bigger apartment. Some take care to use all the items inside, while others clear them out—wary of what could happen, chemically speaking, to an errant lotion left in a bag for decades.

On the resale market, highly sought-after kits can fetch over \$100. But many collectors say buying online is tantamount to cheating.

Chris Miedl, an airline blogger from Germany, estimates he's accumulated at least 70 from his travels. There's a neon-yellow China Airlines collaboration with the North Face and a square black Singapore Airlines pouch that comes with a Lalique candle and a warning: DO NOT USE IN AIRCRAFT.

“I love every single one,” said Miedl, who stores them in a silver airline service trolley he bought at auction for a few hundred euros. He’s since ordered two more trolleys, one for pajamas and the other for more amenity kits.

To Miedl, 51, the kits are a way for airlines to treat their high-spending passengers like valued guests. And the airlines have tried to outdo each other, inking deals with high-end retailers: Turkish Airlines and Lanvin, Delta and Missoni, Saudia and Elie Saab.

Women who fly Emirates first class are treated to more than \$100 worth of Bulgari's Le Gemme Sahare eau de parfum. There's also a golden pocket mirror. Men get Bulgari perfume, a woody scent "inspired by the vibrant energy of the Blood-red Jasper gemstone."

It wasn't always like this, said

Chris Miedl stores his kits in a silver airline service trolley.

Rhonda Crawford, senior vice president of customer experience design and strategy at American Airlines.

After cutbacks during the pandemic, she said, some airlines wondered if they should keep offering amenity kits at all. (American said it never considered it.) But the post-pandemic boom—and a travel-obsessed generation of young fliers—has reinvigorated the call for high-end products.

"There is just a growing demand for experiences—and, quite honestly, premium experiences," Crawford said. She considers the kits "the sparkle on top of the core offering."

American has dabbled in specialty kits, including a collaboration with

Andrew Lim has collected around 200 amenity kits on his travels.

U.S. Soccer tied to this summer's World Cup that tucked cooling gel into a clear, stadium-friendly bag. Its standard fare—which is also available in premium economy—includes products from celebrity facialist Joanna Vargas.

Ben Nickel-D'Andrea relies on the travel-sized bottles for much of his day-to-day skin care.

The Seattle-based freelance travel journalist takes a more utilitarian approach to his roughly 150-kit collection. Mini toothbrushes and socks go to charity. Beauty products stay until he or his husband, also a travel journalist, need them again. Some bags—like the hard-shell United case he uses for medications—get frequent use.

About 15 are on display in his home office, alongside model planes and other travel paraphernalia. “It wasn’t intentional,” the 41-year-old said. “We just ran out of space in our storage bins.”

Parth Kochhar checks what amenity kits are available before he books a flight—though it doesn't yet influence his final purchases. “I’m not being spoiled with that choice,” he joked.

He's collected around 30. Once the 34-year-old has his hands on a kit, he wouldn't dream of using the high-end beauty products inside—even on a flight. That could disturb the thin slips of paper some kits are wrapped with.

"I just don't feel like opening it," said Kochhar, a consultant from Gurugram, India. "I could slide it and probably see, but I feel like if it doesn't go into the same shape or the same place, it wouldn't seem right."

The kit he's currently coveting is Qatar Airways' collaboration with Diptyque, full of beauty offerings from the French perfumer. If he can't resist sampling it, he'll ask a flight attendant for a second one.

For Lim, the e-commerce specialist, the holy grail is something rarer still: a kit from North Korean carrier Air Koryo.

"I don't know if they give out amenities," he said. "But that would be a good one to have."

ARTS IN REVIEW

FILM REVIEW | KYLE SMITH

Stanley Kubrick's Legacy

n John Ford's greatest masterpiece, his adaptation of John Steinbeck's "The Grapes of Wrath" (1940), a family of Oklahomans ruined by the 1930s Dust Bowl disaster sets

about stopping the bulldozer driver sent to flatten the home they no longer own. But why blame this beleaguered fellow? He's doing it because he needs a job.

The Criterion Collection gathers the master director's complete films

His orders came from the Shawnee Land and Cattle Co. So, train a shotgun on its president, maybe? No, we are told, that executive is simply trying to keep up with the demands of his bank. Maybe go to Tulsa and shoot a banker? "He ain't anything but the manager," we learn, just another worried guy trying to keep up his bottom line.

“Then who do we shoot?” asks a puzzled farmer.

And there it was, the predicament of modern man: You can't fight your enemy because you can't see your enemy. The antagonist is everywhere, and nowhere. He has no face, no home address.

Ford's successor as the American cinema's greatest master of image and composition, Stanley Kubrick (1928-1999), built his career on this insight. In Kubrick's films, men get caught up in a faceless, abstract, all-powerful system, fight it with everything they have, and are ground to dust—with one notable exception. The filmmaker, or God, can almost be heard chuckling offscreen as the final frames roll.

The man Christopher Nolan calls the greatest filmmaker who ever lived now has his monument: "The Complete Kubrick," a 30-disc, \$600 boxed set of 4K Blu-Ray editions of all 13 features. The Criterion Collection package also includes Kubrick's three short films, archival interviews, and several documentaries about the director—including the revealing one made by Vivian Kubrick, who followed her dad around as he filmed "The Shining." As befits an obsessive director, it's a gift for obsessives. (The release date is Oct. 20.)

Kubrick called his experimental first film (“Fear and Desire,” 1952) a failure, and his second, “Killer’s Kiss” (1955), isn’t very good. The other 11? Pretty much all landmarks, even the one that, Kubrick groused, reduced him to a “hired hand”—1960’s “Spartacus,” a brilliant mid-century epic but not re-

ally Kubrickian. Producer-star

Kirk Douglas called the shots.

The filmmaker told a decades-long tale about men undone by war (1957's “Paths of Glory,” 1987's “Full Metal Jacket”), the military-industrial complex (1964's “Dr. Strangelove”), lust (1962's “Lolita”), the supernatural (1980's “The Shining”), dreams (1999's “Eyes Wide Shut”), and fate (1956's “The Killing,” 1975's “Barry Lyndon”). In most cases, the indomitable system exploits a major character flaw: The ghosts don't really do anything for Jack Torrance in “The Shining” except unlock a cabinet for him. It's his rage-filled alcoholism, or alcohol-fueled rage, that destroys him.

These films' icy, forbidding majesty invites re-watch after re-watch; I've been cueing up "Barry

Lyndon" every couple of years for four decades, and it always lands differently. Kubrick didn't lecture us or seek to comfort or improve us. "Fail Safe" (1964) tells the same story as "Dr. Strangelove," released the same year, yet has faded from the cultural memory because its earnest message-making doesn't endure like Kubrick's wicked irony.

Though the New York-born filmmaker would have deplored today's micro attention spans, his work has adapted to the 2020s. The elliptical and oblique aspects are made to be dissected by chat groups; meme-worthy images get endlessly recycled. Tony Curtis calling out, “I’m Spartacus!” is indelible cinematic history, as are Slim Pickens’s whooping through his end-of-the-world rodeo in “Dr. Strangelove,” the eyes-propped-open brainwashing in 1971’s “A

Clockwork Orange," Frozen Jack at the end of "The Shining," and the "I dare you" look in Sue Lyon's eye as she suns herself in a bikini in "Lolita."

In a way, the least Kubrickian story is “2001: A Space Odyssey” (1968) because it’s the only one in which the hero triumphs, and on a mind-boggling scale. Astronaut Dave Bowman is reborn as a god-like character (called Star Child in the companion novel by Kubrick’s co-screenwriter Arthur C. Clarke) who is in effect Friedrich Nietzsche’s Übermensch, the ultimate life form. Kubrick pointedly paired the appearance with “Sunrise” from Richard Strauss’s Nietzsche-saluting composition “Also Sprach Zarathustra.” Possibly Kubrick felt he displayed enough optimism here to cover him for a lifetime of bleak endings; “A Clockwork Orange” does

Sterling Hayden (gesturing) and company in 'The Killing,' Kubrick's puzzle-like 1956 noir.

close with a sort of victory by its protagonist, but it's an ironic one, as a psychopathic murderer extinguishes all reform efforts and reverts to his horrible true self.

"The Killing," which was an inspiration for Quentin Tarantino's "Reservoir Dogs," is among the foundational examples of how to film a jigsaw-puzzle story that trusts the audience to assemble it—then a rare approach, now nearly ubiquitous, especially in prestige television. It's a tale of an exacting, step-by-step plan to rob a racetrack and how it is wittily undone by even more meticulous and unforgiving fate. Kubrick ends it with his signature black-comic panache. Sterling Hayden's Johnny Clay, having endured all manner of complications, watches helplessly as a suitcase full of stolen money spills off a luggage cart. The cash blows away. "You've got to run!" he is told. "What's the difference," he replies, with impeccable noir-antihero resignation.

Johnny can't escape fate any more than Barry Lyndon, the penniless Irish rogue who paves a path of lies through 18th-century Europe, rises to a surprisingly high station, yet ultimately suffers the necessary comeuppance, and then some. The Harvard Lampoon declared “Barry Lyndon” “dull” and “the worst film of 1975.” Today it ranks as the 12th-best film of all time in Sight and Sound’s 2022 directors’ poll and 45th in its critics’ poll. Similarly, the weird and slow-developing “Eyes Wide Shut”—call it “1999: A Sex Odyssey”—doesn’t give up its secrets easily. Yet it keeps winning new and obsessive admirers.

The film world considered Stanley Kubrick a genius while he was alive, but if anything his reputation stands even higher a quarter-century after his death. When he passed, Steven Spielberg noted: "He created more than just movies. He gave us complete environmental experiences that got more, not less, intense the more you watched his pictures. He copied no one while all of us were scrambling to imitate him." Kubrick's cinema may last forever . . . and ever . . . and ever.

ARTS CALENDAR

HAPPENINGS FOR THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 13

BY WSJ ARTS IN REVIEW STAFF

Film

"You Can See Everything" (Oct. 16)

Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes and her partner, Billy Evans, hosted a documentary crew led by Lance Oppenheim and Nathan Fielder to capture their lives in the leadup to Holmes's entry to federal prison to serve a sentence for defrauding investors. Mr. Oppenheim and Mr. Fielder, the latter making his feature directorial debut, then followed the couple for three years.

"Sacrifice" (Netflix, Oct. 16)

"Street Fighter" (Oct. 16)

Elizabeth Holmes in 'You Can See Everything.'

The Capcom videogame series gets a big-screen story in which estranged brawlers reunite to enter a major tournament. Among those throwing fists in the ensemble cast are Noah Centineo, Andrew Koji, Callina Liang, Joe "Roman Reigns" Anoa'i, Cody Rhodes, Eric André, Andrew Schulz, Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson, Jason Momoa and Orville Peck.

TV

"Masterplan"

(Prime Video, Oct. 16)

(Prime Video, Oct. 16)

Stanley Tucci stars as a skilled thief who teams up with strangers, played by Simona Tabasco and Victor Belmondo, to steal the Mona Lisa. During their work a surprising family connection among the trio comes to light.

A fading celebrity (Chris Evans) tries to engineer a career comeback at a swanky charity dinner only to be interrupted by eco-terrorists (Anya Taylor-Joy and Yung Lean).

Theater

"Other Desert Cities"

(Hudson Theatre, New York,

Oct. 18-Jan. 17, 2027)

Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Ed Harris and Allison Janney star in the Broadway revival of Jon Robin Baitz's 2012 Pulitzer finalist. John Benjamin Hickey directs

this tale of a well-connected family whose status is put at risk when its daughter returns home having written a tell-all memoir.

Music

Fontaines D.C., "Dopamine Chamber" (Oct. 16)

The Irish alt rockers embrace a more synth-driven sound on their fifth album, which includes a feature from Spanish singer-songwriter Rosalía.

Max Richter, "While the Flood Rages" (Oct. 16)

Opera

The German-born composer's new release is adapted from his score for Wayne McGregor's ballet "MaddAddam," which was inspired by post-apocalyptic stories by Margaret Atwood.

"Carmen" (Los Angeles Opera, Oct. 17-Nov. 7)

Bizet's masterpiece gets a new staging that embraces the Spanish Gothic in this production directed by Thaddeus Strassberger and conducted by Domingo Hindoyan.

Art

"Siena: The Art of Bronze, 1450-1500" (The Frick Collection, New York, Oct. 15-Jan. 18, 2027)

This is the first exhibition to focus on Siena as the center of experimentation and innovation in bronze during the Italian Renaissance. Some 40 works—including statues, reliefs, medals and more, many of which have never been shown outside of Tuscany—reveal the genius of Donatello, Vecchietta, Francesco di Giorgio and others.

"Walker Design Triennial: Beyond Materialism" (Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, Oct. 17-Feb. 14, 2027)

The museum launches a triennial that looks at the ways design shapes culture, both responding to current ideas and shaping the way we interact with the world. This inaugural exhibition focuses on how contemporary design is moving away from industrial concerns toward more spiritual subjects.

Last Call

"Creatures of Myth and Imagination: Europe and the Americas"

(The Met Cloisters, New York, through Oct. 18)

This exhibition reveals the enduring trans-Atlantic fascination with beings that transcend species and reality. Our critic noted, "Despite a sea between them literally and metaphorically, Europe and the Americas shared a common imagination, a curiosity to explain the unknown, and a desire to make the mystical beautiful."

Write to

brian.kelly@wsj.com.

COVERED COSTS | By Aaron Ullman

---

The WSJ Daily Crossword | Edited by Mike Shenk

Across

1 What your heart might skip

6 Facts and figures

10 Problem for a sound engineer

14 1929 stock market event

15 Sounds from awed people

16 Thailand neighbor

17 Game night strictures

19 Singer-songwriter Tori

20 God among the Avengers

21 Probing question

23 American marsupial

26 1974 pop hit “\_\_\_\_-Ca-Dabra”

27 “Diet Pepsi” singer Addison \_\_\_\_

29 Wall climber

30 Coming-of-age ceremonies for some girls

33 Yammer

35 Modern, in Munich

36 Supply for brewers and bakers

37 Häagen-Dazs flavor

41 Its highest point is Mount Katahdin

43 Vernacular ending

44 Initialism that might add Q at the end

47 Theorist with no sphere of influence?

51 West End washroom

52 Rock blaster

53 Small singing groups

54 Drip coffee with a shot of espresso

56 Groups of glitterati

58 Frenchman's female friend

59 Airborne annoyance

60 Unexpected costs, as found in four of this puzzle's answers

65 Bay State gridiron team, familiarly

66 Different, in Durango

67 Des Moines denizen, e.g.

68 Regretting a workout, maybe

69 Sunshine State baseball team

70 Just learning about

Down

1 Austrian's exclamation

2 Frat bud

3 Water in the Loire

4 Helpers, for short

▶ Solve this puzzle online and discuss it at WSJ.com/Puzzles.

5 Boston

nickname

6 Relentlessly

gloomy

7 IM pioneer

8 1960s-'70s

procedural

series starring

Efrem

Zimbalist Jr.

9 Forcefully

declare

10 Its first flight

went from

Switzerland

to Israel

11 Replay

analyst's

concern

12 Exuberant

cries

13 Covert WWII

org.

18 Itinerant people of Europe

22 "Straight Outta Compton" rapper

23 Cherry discard

24 Potential embryos

25 "Ariel" poet

26 Spell binders?

28 Contractor's fig.

31 Aviv

32 Osso buco meat

34 Philosopher Immanuel

38 Requires

39 Volcanic spew

40 "Pass over some suds"

41 Advanced theater deg.

42 Fact-filled book

45 "Golly!"

46 One of 18 for a frog

48 One who does the write thing

49 Bilingual Muppet on "Sesame Street"

50 Control, as spending

55 "Moll Flanders" writer

57 Wee

58 Commotions

59 Sch. stat

61 Like some humor and some weather

62 "Blecch!"

63 Chow down

64 Winter product prefix

Previous Puzzle's Solution

The Blunder That NFL Teams Keep Making Again and Again

The Philadelphia Eagles and Washington Commanders both coughed up wins in jaw-dropping fashion because of clock-management issues in the final moments of their Week 5 games

BY ANDREW BEATON

he Philadelphia Eagles had taken a one-point lead over the Jacksonville Jaguars on Sunday, and with eight seconds remaining they were all

but guaranteed to have a cheerful flight home from London.

And yet, they somehow managed to lose anyway. The reason was right there on the Philadelphia sideline.

The Jaguars were able to steal the win because Eagles head coach Nick Sirianni didn't kill as much clock as he could have and then elected to give Jacksonville kick returner Ameer Abdullah something he could return, instead of having his team kick for a touchback.

Abdullah took advantage by bringing it back 53 yards. That left a single second on the clock for Cam Little to nail a 57-yard field goal and clinch a 19-17 victory that left the Eagles absolutely devastated.

“I didn’t make the right decision,” Sirianni said, “and I lost us that game.”

The only consolation for Siri-

anni might be that it wasn't even the most astonishing ending on Sunday afternoon. A few hours later, the Washington Commanders were in position for a game-winning field goal against the New York Giants in the final minute of overtime, but inexplicably killed so much time that the game clock expired after quarterback Jayden Daniels went down without a time-out, resulting in a 27-27 tie. It was so boneheaded that Giants players celebrated as if they had won.

Both situations show how even though NFL teams worth billions of dollars pay their players,

Top: The Jaguars' Cam Little reacts after a game-winning kick. Left: Jayden Daniels and the Commanders tied the Giants.

coaches and executives fortunes to make the best decisions, they still routinely bungle something most fans on their couches can understand: late-game clock management. In both instances, the Eagles and Commanders committed strategic malpractice and paid the price by not walking off the

field with a victory.

“Leaving tonight with a tie feels like a loss,” Washington coach Dan Quinn said. “I’m gutted for our team.”

For the Eagles to blow Sunday's game, it actually took a series of errors. Already within field-goal range in the final minute, they

threw the ball on both first and second downs, resulting in an in-completion and a receiver running out of bounds—stopping the clock for Jacksonville each time. When the Eagles ran the ball on third down, the Jaguars used their final timeout, which they only had because Philadelphia hadn't made them burn it earlier. Otherwise, the Eagles' field-goal attempt could have been the final play of the game.

Instead, the Eagles had to kick-off with eight seconds to go, and they blundered again. If Eagles kicker Jake Elliott had blasted a kick for a touchback, the Jaguars would have had almost no time—with no timeouts—to make something happen. Instead, Eagles kicker Jake Elliott sent one that Abdullah could easily handle before he was brought down just in time for a field goal.

“It sucks,” Elliott said. “You come all this way and you think you’re in the driver’s seat to win a big game, and now we’re feeling pretty down.”

Oddly enough, a team faced a similar decision just a couple of weeks ago and also miscalculated. In that case, the Dallas Cowboys erred by doing what the Eagles should have done.

Playing the Baltimore Ravens, the Cowboys tied the game with seven seconds to go before they kicked off for a touchback, giving the Ravens the ball at the 35-yardline. Even a return as long as Abdullah's would have left the clock with all zeros. And unlike Jacksonville, Baltimore had a timeout left. That allowed quarterback Lamar Jackson to make a long completion and stop the clock to set up the game-winning kick.

The two outcomes show how three years into the NFL's new kickoff rules, teams are still bumbling through the search for optimal moves. Entering this season, there hadn't been a single instance of both teams making field goals in the final 10 seconds of the fourth quarter, according to Stats Perform records dating back to 1970. It has now happened twice in the past three weeks after Sunday's Eagles-Jaguars game.

“You feel like you let everyone down,” Sirianni said. “That will stick with me for a long time.”

The result in Washington was even more gobsmacking. The Commanders had the ball in position for a field goal with about a minute left. After a running play bled away most of it, quarterback Jayden Daniels took another snap with 12 seconds to go and went down. Only Washington didn't have another timeout. And instead of kicking a field goal, the team was left kicking itself when time expired.

It didn't bode well for Quinn's job security when the sequence was promptly assailed by none other than one of the team's owners.

“I’m in total disbelief my Commanders had such poor clock management,” Magic Johnson posted on X. “All we had to do was kick the field goal and we would have won the game!”

JASON GAY

The Yankees Aren't Arrogant Jerks Anymore. That Might Be a Problem.

Is there anything less frightening than the New York Yankees in the playoffs?

A warm basket full of kittens? A gentle

hayride at the state fair? Curling up in a hammock with a lemonade and a copy of “Clifford the Big Red Dog?”

How about a vegetarian shark? A comfy sweater? How about two warm baskets full of kittens? I'm asking because New York's most historically entitled, championship-gorged baseball club has a crisis: no one's scared of them anymore.

Why should they be?

Last week, the Tampa Bay Rays rolled into big, bad Yankee Stadium, put their feet on the couch, and swept the passive, punchless Pinstripes out of the postseason. The Game 3 finale was disrupted by a fan interference call—what is it with overenthusiastic Yankee fans and outfield walls—but the result was hard to dispute.

The better, poorer team won.

Which means for the 17th straight season, the Yankees won't win a World Series title. While that dry spell will draw empty stares from fans in Seattle, Pittsburgh or San Diego, it's a fiasco for a franchise that's won 27 of them and regards October silverware as its birthright.

These are the Yankees, for crying out loud! This is a team that's supposed to start every spring with a promise to win a ring—or walk straight into the Hudson.

Instead one of the most successful franchises in sports is now a speed bump on the way to somebody else's title. In their last 13 playoff appearances, the Yankees have made the World Series only once.

They lost that, too.

Surely you've seen Yankee fans strutting around in those braggy jackets, the ones with patches for all the World Series titles—not just the titles with Derek Jeter, but also the titles with Bill Dickey, as if the jacket owner was alive for those.

A new jacket is in order: BACK TO BACK DIVISIONAL SERIES RUNNER-UP. '25-'26.

Order me one. I'll wear it for Halloween and scare no one.

The Rays weren't the least bit intimidated by any of it, not even the Yankee fans who invaded their home at the Trop.

Tampa Bay rolled over a sloppy Yankees team like it was a three-game series against the Rockies in June.

Afterward, for laughs, the Rays cranked up the speakers in the visitor's clubhouse and played Sinatra's "New York, New York"—the official Yankee theme.

For the 17th straight season, the Yankees won't win a World Series title.

Does that sound like an intimidated opponent?

In the olden days, when George Steinbrenner was rattling around in a turtleneck, it would have been different. Surrender was unacceptable. Phones would be destroyed. Back pages would ooze disgust. Limp bats would be exiled and heads would roll. There'd be a loud pledge to straighten it out. Even if they didn't straighten it out.

These Yankees aren't those Yankees. George's son Hal doesn't run hot like his late father. His team is run clinically, analytically—modern but a little soulless. These 21st century Yankees are strangely loyal. Manager Aaron Boone has survived nine seasons without a title, an unthinkable milestone in George's time. Brian Cashman is closing in on three decades as general manager.

These jobs used to have the permanence of a summertime life-guard. Cashman is a Supreme Court justice.

Big George's run tends to be confused with prolonged success—it's important to remember the last time the Yankees had a 17-year gap was from 1979 until 1996, Steinbrenner's domineering, paws-on prime.

After the Reggie titles in ‘77 and ‘78, the franchise didn’t win another Series until Admiral Huffenpuff was sidelined with a suspension and patient GM Stick Michael cultivated a young roster.

Still, it's hard to argue that the edge is gone.

These Yankees—led by mild-mannered slugger Aaron Judge, who was injured these playoffs—are inoffensive, even likable. They don't ooze the urgency or arrogance that defined other Yankee eras.

Frustrated Yankee fans fret that the team is no longer baseball's biggest spender—the Dodgers, Mets and Phillies spent more in payroll in 2026. The Dodgers and Phillies used it to reach the playoffs. The Mets used it to make a big leaf pile of money at Citi Field and set it on fire.

The Yankees once spent whatever it took--and worried about the repercussions later. Now there's

fiscal responsibility, but without the clever roster building of low-payroll teams like Tampa Bay or Milwaukee.

The reigning back-to-back champ Dodgers do whatever it takes (and yes, this is its own intrigue.) Los Angeles is the behemoth everyone hates, to the point their spending and dominance may result in an extended lockout and work stoppage.

The Dodgers don't care. They lean right into the supervillainy.

“We’re smarter, we’re better, and we’re tougher,” Dodgers manager Dave Roberts said after Los Angeles moved on to another National League Championship Series. He said this knowing full well the public would see it and want to hurl.

These Yankees need a little more of that. Likability is nice, but it won't win a ring.

Trump's Shock-and-Awe Strategy

GLOBAL

VIEW

By Walter

Russell Mead

After nearly six years in the White House and more than a decade at the center of American politics, Donald Trump can still shock the world. In the

past week alone, he has hinted at new attacks on Iran after the midterm elections, said that the U.S. will buy diesel fuel from Russia as American officials warned Europeans about a possible cutoff of weapons, announced an “energy cease-fire” that appeared to catch Kyiv by surprise, mused publicly about resuming hostilities against the Houthis, and called on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to step aside.

The president's latest burst of diplomatic activity reflects his convictions about Iran, Russia, the importance of energy and the unimportance of Europe. He has seen Iran as a threat to the U.S. since the 1980s and believes that an Iranian nuclear weapon or Iranian domination of the Persian Gulf's energy resources would threaten American interests. He believes that fossil fuels will remain a key element of geopolitical and economic power and wants the U.S. to play the predominant role in the Gulf.

Similarly, Mr. Trump believes that the U.S. and Russia have overlapping interests in preventing Moscow from becoming Beijing's junior partner, countering Sunni Islamist militancy, and managing their roles as major energy producers. Mr. Trump and Vladimir Putin also share a contempt for what they agree is the civilizational suicide embraced by modern European liberals. Washington and Moscow in this view shouldn't be divided by anything as petty as the nationalistic ambitions of Ukraine or the moans of its liberal supporters in Europe.

Meanwhile, Mr. Trump knows that his political coalition is divided into restrainer and hawkish wings. The hawks want tough policies against both Russia and Iran. The restrainers want the U.S. to make up with Moscow and leave the Middle East alone.

Mr. Trump has sought to reconcile his own instincts with the wishes of his base by pursuing a divided policy. While never giving anybody everything, in general he's given the hawks more influence over Iran policy while catering to restrainer sensibilities on Russia. As he contemplates a longer and messier war in the Middle East, Mr. Trump wants to satisfy his restrainer allies with a more aggressive attempt to build ties to Moscow. That he can present his Russia diplomacy as an effort to secure cheaper fuel as the midterms approach is an added benefit.

But however reasonable this policy mix may look to the White House, the public doesn't like the Iran war and the high fuel prices it brings, and it doesn't like accommodating Russia. Playing to the hawks in the Gulf and to the restrainers on Russia may distribute the pain evenly across Mr. Trump's coalition, but judging from the polls, the coalition is shrinking. Mr. Trump's presidency appears to be entering a new and from his point of view perhaps less satisfactory stage.

---

The president tries to reconcile restrainers and hawks with his foreign-policy goals.

It is faith in Mr. Trump, not ideology, that ultimately holds the fractious MAGA coalition together. As the believers see it, Mr. Trump can close the border and eliminate anti-American governments across the Western Hemisphere. He can stop drug smuggling and break the cartels. He can reshore manufacturing, unleashing a golden age of blue-collar prosperity. He can reverse the tide of decadence and secularism. He can beat back the advance of interfering bureaucrats and anti-American globalists. His methods may sometimes look strange or even distasteful, but nobody can deliver what he does.

To keep the enchantment alive, Mr. Trump must keep

Americans and the world fixated on the spectacle of the Trump Show. And he must keep the gap between glittering promise and inevitably disappointing results to a minimum.

Wars make the former task easier but complicate the latter. Conflicts make for compelling theater, and nobody understands this better than Mr. Trump. But wars also turn out to be hard to spin. Despite the president's efforts, the war between Russia and Ukraine continues to escalate. Despite his claims about Iran's weakness and helplessness, gasoline and diesel prices remain high and reports about the vulnerability of American bases in the Gulf to Iranian missiles persist. Where's the magic, supporters are beginning to wonder.

Disenchantment starts slowly but can quickly go viral. With polls pointing to tough midterms for Republicans, lame-duck status becoming more of a concern, and interest rates and inflation hitting voters, Mr. Trump may be facing the hardest years of his long career. It could be a lonely struggle. Not only do America's adversaries want him to fail, so do many of our allies.

Shock-and-awe foreign policy offers hope of breakthroughs that would shore up the president's position. The world should brace for more Trump shocks. He has no incentive to calm things down.

How Canada Should Fight Trump

MAIN

STREET

By William

McGurn

Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario "Trump's hatred for Canada has permanently damaged world's best trade relationship."

So reads a Saturday head-

ODD KOROL/REUTERS

line in the Edmonton Journal. It isn't surprising, given the president's penchant for belittling Canada by referring to Prime Minister Mark Carney as the “governor” and the country as our “51st state.”

We are in the thick of a trade war that began in February 2025 and shows no signs of abating. Meanwhile, the Parti Québécois won enough seats in last week's provincial

---

The prime minister plays a popular but self-defeating game of tariff tit for tat.

election to form a separatist minority government. And it looks as if Canada also faces a separatist movement in oil-rich Alberta.

In this context Mr. Trump may be the only thing the Canadians agree on.

That isn't because he's popular. British-based Lord Ashcroft Polls found that only $25\%$ of Canadians consider America an ally. That's down from $73\%$ in 2022, when Joe Biden was president.

Nervousness about the U.S.-Canada trade war is bolstering support for Mr. Carney. Unfortunately, when he does something to answer Mr. Trump's volleys, it often turns out to be a Canadian form of the protectionism he rightly regards as destructive when Mr. Trump directs it at Canadians.

The pattern is self-defeating—and Trumpian. After the Trump tariffs on Canadian products, the Canadian government imposed 25% retaliatory tariffs on nearly \$30 billion of American goods. Then, in May 2025, the U.S. introduced 25% levies on autos and parts.

Earlier this year, the president's war took a hit when the Supreme Court ruled that he exceeded his authority with his sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. The Trump administration invoked the Trade Act of 1974. Canada also adjusted and is looking to formalize a closer economic relationship with the European Union.

Which prompts a question: Are there Canadians who believe they have gained from this whole back and forth?

The answer is surely no. The prime minister plainly decided that the best response, or maybe the only politically viable one, was to try to out-Trump Mr. Trump. As for the president, when reporters asked last week about trade negotiations before the midterm elections, he said the terms of trade currently favor Canada—but that this is changing: "It will work out eventually, but I don't know about—the United States is in no rush."

Prime Minister Mark Carney.

Mr. Trump is probably right that America, with a larger and stronger economy, can absorb more pain than Canada can. But that's zero-sum thinking. A real trade deal should benefit all parties, not by carving up markets but by leaving anyone who wants to buy or sell a product with a consenting adult from across his border free to do so.

Yes, countries cheat. But no one has figured out a way of punishing cheats without imposing unfair costs on innocent bystanders. It says something that Mike Rogers, a Trump-supporting Republican in Michigan running in a tight Senate race against Democrat Abdul El-Sayed, is running ads reminding voters that “Canada is not the enemy.”

As dumb as tariffs are, retaliating with countertariffs, as Mr. Carney is doing, is dumber still. He explained it this way in August: “Canada will match those tariffs dollar for dollar to protect our workers and businesses.”

The better response is to take steps that ensure America, not Canada, pays the price for its inefficiency and protectionism. That means freeing up the Canadian market.

“Retaliatory tariffs,” write Jock Finlayson and Steve Globerman of the Vancouver-based Fraser Institute, “will increase the cost of living for Canadian households but are unlikely to weaken Trump’s tariff fixation. Indeed, the Trump administration may respond to any incremental Canadian ‘retaliation’ by announcing additional market access restrictions targeting various Canadian industries.”

These tariffs make even less sense for Canada given the outsize U.S. role in its economy. Americans are the No. 1 customer for Canada, and vice versa.

Mr. Trump can be cutting when he dismisses Canada, such as the crack that “we don’t need them for anything.” But tell that to the American industries that rely on Canada for oil, electricity and natural gas. It’s another reason Canada would do better to fight Mr. Trump by opening its economy rather than joining his game of chicken.

“Canada has one of the strongest private property rights regimes in the developed world,” Mr. Globerman says. “It should leverage that by significant corporate tax and regulatory reform—which they have started to.”

Write to mcgurn@wsj.com.

Sometimes Government Is Innovative

By Egon Rinderer

President Trump and top artificial-intelligence executives signed a voluntary pact last month largely allowing companies to self-regulate, with no penalties for AI-agent misbehavior. Critics say Washington is allowing the industry to police itself. They have a point.

The federal government is far ahead of the private sector in securing its systems against rogue agents. In my 37 years in information-technology security, largely working alongside federal agencies, I never saw Washington lead industry on technology until now. That advantage reflects two decades of federal agencies' strengthening their security protocols.

Today's best cyber defense is known as zero-trust network access. Once a rogue AI agent is inside a network, it moves like other malware. After landing on a machine, it will try to move laterally to the next, hunting for data, passwords or other systems to take over. That horizontal movement is how most serious cyber breaches spread.

Under the zero-trust approach, devices don't trust each other merely because they are on the same network.

---

Federal agencies got out ahead of industry on cybersecurity.

They must prove they are authorized during every connection. The effect is to contain rogue agents as soon as they land on a system, with no avenue to spread.

Federal agencies are under a strict mandate to adopt zero-trust security infrastructure. The Pentagon has a deadline to reach full integration by the end of fiscal 2027.

Several executive-branch directives dictate how fast agencies must patch cybersecurity vulnerabilities and how thoroughly they must keep inventory of the software they use. Agencies must report their progress to the White House's Office of Management and Budget, and they risk losing funding if they fall behind target.

These guidelines govern purchasing too. Software that can't operate in a segmented network will soon be unfit for federal use, and agencies are writing this requirement into future contracts.

Industry began adopting a zero-trust approach several years ago, but work has stalled. I believe most large companies got 80% of the way there but stopped because of concerns about disruption and high costs.

That was shortsighted. Companies are racing to deploy AI agents on networks allowing the free movement that zero-trust architecture is designed to prevent. The result will be more data theft and disruptions to critical systems.

Businesses aren't bound by voluntary government directives, but they still operate in the real world. The federal government's zero-trust strategy is publicly available, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency offers additional guidance about implementation.

While federal AI regulation is needed, businesses shouldn't wait for Washington's orders to take the technology's risk seriously. When rogue AI agents cause havoc, the press will rush to blame the technology itself. But some fault will lie with the private sector for not safeguarding its defenses. They should finish what they started.

Mr. Rinderer is senior vice president for federal and enterprise growth at NinjaOne, an endpoint-management and remote-monitoring software company.

BOOKSHELF | By Harold Holzer

Making a Martyr For the Union

A Glorious Fate

By Kevin M. Levin

North Carolina, 328 pages, \$32.50

At the climax of Edward Zwick's film "Glory"—and of Kevin M. Levin's riveting biography of Robert Gould Shaw—a young white colonel of the Union Army leads his black troops across a narrow strip of South Carolina beach into a murderous Confederate fusillade from the seemingly impregnable Fort Wagner on July 18, 1863. Anyone who has seen the 1989 film knows what happens next: Shaw, the spruce, Harvard-educated scion of an elite Boston family, falls dead in a hail of bullets and shells and topples into a heap of black bodies. As an intended insult, Confederates bury him with his men in a shallow mass grave. A hero of the Civil War dies, and a martyr is born.

It is hard to imagine any book rendering this scene more vividly than the cinematic version, but Mr. Levin has managed the task with panache. What truly elevates “A Glorious Fate,” however, is the author’s revealing look at Shaw’s complex personality—including his surprising indifference about slavery. In contrast to the nobly principled leader of historical fiction, Mr. Levin offers up the real, flawed Shaw, a young man more vainglorious than glorious. The book adds a frank examination of

the mystique that grew up around Shaw after his death—a calculated effort to sanctify him in the hope of advancing racial equality in both the military ranks and post-Civil War America.

Mr. Levin, an independent historian who publishes the Substack newsletter Civil War Memory—widely read by history buffs and scholars alike—specializes in puncturing myths, particularly the stubborn misconception that black men served voluntarily in the Confederate ranks. In “A Glorious Fate,” he turns his attention to the genuine, important presence of black soldiers in the Union Army, and to one of the first official regiments to recruit them: the 54th Massachusetts Infantry, which Shaw commanded and which lost half its men at the ill-fated assault on Fort Wagner. The first biography of Shaw to appear in decades, it takes its place as the most nuanced—frequently pausing for analysis without impeding the propulsive narrative that peaks when the 25-year-old meets his moment.

Shaw was born in 1837 in Dartmouth, Mass. His wealthy parents, Francis and Sarah, were ardent abolitionists who migrated to a succession of like-minded communities. When Robert was still young, the family moved to Staten Island, N.Y., where he was miserable at home and at school. In his teens, he developed a rebellious streak more directed to gambling, drinking and reckless spending than on antislavery idealism. “I have no taste for anything excepting amusing myself,” he admitted to his indulgent mother in a letter. Later, while a student at Harvard, he confessed, “I hate Cambridge.” Mr. Levin paints the pampered youngster as a “stubbornly self-centered” boy who kept “studiously aloof” from the anti-slavery activism that young Harvard radicals embraced in the late 1850s—and that Shaw was all but born to.

Then how, one wonders, was Shaw born again as a champion of black rights? Mr. Levin's answer is that he really wasn't. "I don't talk and think Slavery all the time," Shaw told his dismayed parents as the secession crisis worsened. He all but welcomed disunion because it offered him a chance to pursue his only true passion: Army service.

---

Shaw's parents rejected offers to disinter his remains. Their son could have no better resting place than among his black troops.

Shaw began his military career as a recruit in the Seventh New York Militia Regiment (made up of the sons of many well-to-do families), marching off to war only a week after the 1861 attack on Fort Sumter. Later Shaw became an officer in the all-white Second Massachusetts Infantry, seeing action at Cedar Mountain and Antietam. To the last, Mr. Levin argues, Shaw cared more about “military concerns” than the “moral crusade” championed by his parents.

When black enlistment began in earnest in 1863, Shaw did not campaign to lead a unit of black soldiers. The opportunity came to him in recognition of the elder Shaws' abolitionist credentials. Shaw, in fact, turned down the commission at first before changing his mind. A friend later recalled Shaw expressing doubts that "negro troops . . . would fight in [the] line of battle," wondering whether it might be necessary to order white soldiers to march behind them and prod them forward with bayonets. Toward the formerly enslaved people he encountered in the South, he could summon no more than paternalism, remarking on "their utter ignorance, and innocence of evil."

Yet this same, initially indifferent Shaw quickly trained his recruits into a skilled fighting unit and supported their fight for equal pay. After a sendoff at Boston Harbor, Shaw and the 54th headed south, where in June 1863 the newly promoted colonel objected to orders to help loot and burn the town of Darien, Ga. A few weeks later, in South Carolina, Shaw agreed to lead his men in the ill-planned assault on one of the batteries that protected the city of Charleston: the powerfully armed Fort Wagner. Mr. Levin suggests that the assignment was not meant as an honor. A New York Tribune correspondent later reported that he had overheard two senior commanders agreeing, using pungently racist language, to sacrifice the black troops, with one adding that “we may as well get rid of them one time as another.”

Eyewitnesses who glimpsed Shaw in the final minutes before the attack described him as “bent on accomplishing or dying.” Ultimately, his death became his greatest accomplishment. When his parents rejected offers to disinter and return his remains—declaring their son could have no better resting place than among his black troops—Shaw was transfigured from soldier to symbol, celebrated by poets and artists. Even now, he appears in Augustus Saint-Gaudens’s bravura relief sculpture on the Boston Common. Willingly or not, as one 19th-century essayist put it, Shaw became “a voluntary sacrifice on the altar of Liberty for an enslaved race.”

Mr. Holzer is the director of Hunter College's Roosevelt House and the author of “Brought Forth on This Continent: Abraham Lincoln and American Immigration.”

REVIEW & OUTLOOK

If the Saudis Will Fight, the U.S. Can Help

link in the U.S. regional alliance.

M

issile and drone attacks by Yemen's Houthis over the weekend have Saudi Arabia reeling. The skies over Riyadh

emptied after a Saturday strike on the international airport killed 13 and injured more than 300, and a Sunday attack killed one more. Now comes the test for U.S. policy.

Asked Saturday about join-

Asked Saturday about joining Saudi strikes against the Houthis, President Trump said, “We may. We’re going to look at it.” Yet the last thing he seems to want before midterm elections is a military escalation. That hesitation may be what Iran and its Houthi militia proxies, whom it arms and finances, are counting on.

How about a regional anti-Houthi alliance with Israel and U.A.E.?

The U.S. could let the Saudis fend for themselves against the Iranian axis, but at great strategic cost. The region is watching what Washington will do when the cornerstone of its Gulf alliance system is under attack.

This doesn't require a blank check for Riyadh, and U.S. interceptor shortages constrain what Mr. Trump can provide on defense. But this fight won't be won on defense, continuing to play whack-a-mole with Houthi projectiles. That points to offense, where munitions stocks are healthier and U.S. help is needed to take out Houthi surface-to-air missiles.

Real-time U.S. intelligence support is more discreet but equally important. The Saudi-backed Yemeni government offensive already has the Houthis under pressure along Yemen's western coast and Red Sea corridor, but it's moving slowly.

The U.S. can also continue its diplomacy to rally a regional anti-Houthi coalition, including Israel and the United Arab Emirates. The Houthis threaten the region and international shipping, not only Saudi Arabia, and they operate as part of a larger Iranian strategy. Though Houthis-Saudi conflict predates the current Iran war, the war has put Saudi Arabia in the line of fire. Iran may believe it has identified the weak

It didn't have to be this way. The original Western error was to restrain the Saudi-Yemeni

alliance when it had the Houthis on defense. Amid international humanitarian concerns over civilian casualties, a chance to defeat the Iranian proxy was missed in 2018 and 2019. In February 2021 the

new Biden Administration cut off all support—arms, intelligence and logistics—for the anti-Houthi offensive.

To accommodate Iranian power, Joe Biden even lifted the Houthis' terror designation. This for a group whose chant is: "God is the Greatest, Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse be upon the Jews, Victory to Islam." The Saudis then cut a deal to appease the Houthis, including funneling money to grease the peace. As with Qatari money in Gaza, it didn't work. The Houthis used the reprieve to rearm.

The Saudis spent \$83 billion on defense in 2025, more than Israel or Iran. Under direct attack, Riyadh now has to decide if it has the will to fight back. If it doesn't, all the modernizing ambitions of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) will suffer. Few will want to invest in an easy, repeat target.

MBS's new Mecca pact partners, Turkey and Pakistan, don't seem eager to help despite their large militaries. That leaves an appeal to the U.S. as usual. U.S. support doesn't mean standing in for Saudi Arabia but helping it lead. Pushing MBS into another deal with the Houthis instead would lock in the militia's gains in preparation for the next war.

The Houthi challenge may seem obscure, but the stakes are high for the Saudis, the Middle East and the U.S. It is now tied to Mr. Trump's campaign against Iran and his hope for an expansion of the Abraham Accords between Israel and the Arab states that someday includes Saudi Arabia. As it stands now, the Houthis have the upper hand.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

---

Constitutional Originalism and the Framers

Justice Samuel Alito underscores mistakes originalist judges make in applying the theory (“Even Originalist Judges Make Mistakes,” op-ed, Oct. 3). But another mistake can occur with the definitional frame of reference. For him, originalism denotes that “constitutional provisions should be understood to mean what the public would have taken them to mean when they were adopted.” The “public” would mean ordinary people like colonial patrons of taverns who gathered round to read the proposed Constitution in newspapers.

The problem is that the Constitution wasn't adopted by an Athenian democracy where all citizens were lawmakers. The Framers abhorred pure democracy and opted for a republic based on representation. Legislatures appointed the Framers. It follows that the most relevant and practical frame of reference is what the Framers, fewer than 50 of whom were signers, took the provisions to mean rather than what a colonial citizenry of over two million took them to mean.

Justice Alito notes that “the general public or lawmakers in 1868” didn’t understand “liberty” in the 14th Amendment to include same-sex marriage. But the two viewpoints can diverge. From all accounts, ordinary citizens in 1787 interpreted “misdemeanor” as a minor crime but still a crime, just like today’s ordinary citizens. The Framers understood “misdemeanor” as signifying a breach of trust, or abuse of office, not necessarily amounting to any crime.

What words mean to lawmakers who make a law should be paramount in case of divergent meaning,

PROF. EM. MICHAEL J. POLELLE

Univ. of Illinois Chicago School of Law

Sarasota, Fla.

---

Ancient Greece's Greatness Was Built on Trade

In his op-ed “The Birth and Re-birth of Western Civilization” (Oct. 9) based on excerpts from his great speech in Athens, Marco Rubio demonstrates once again that in his head and heart he’s more like Ronald Reagan than any other top Trump administration official. But he omits a major source of Athens’s freedom and greatness that Reagan likely would have put front and center—namely, that Athenian liberty, prosperity and power were built on international trade.

As Will Durant explained in his book “The Life of Greece” (1939), trade was foundational to the prosperity and success of Athens. He wrote: “Foreign commerce advances even faster than domestic trade, for the Greek states have learned the advantages of an international division of labor, and each specializes in some product; the shieldmaker, for example, no longer goes from city to city at the call of those who need him, but makes his shields in his shop and sends them out to the markets of the classic world. In one century Athens moves from household economy—wherein each household makes nearly all that it needs—to urban economy—wherein each town makes nearly all that it needs—to international economy—wherein each state is dependent upon imports, and must make exports to pay for them . . . [I]t is this trade that makes Athens rich.”

PHIL GRAMM AND DONALD J. BOUDREAUX

American Enterprise Institute and

George Mason University

Helotes, Texas, and Fairfax, Va.

Putin Ignores That Energy ‘Cease-Fire’

o much for that energy cease-fire between Russia and Ukraine. President Trump announced the truce Sunday on Truth So-

cial, along with the warning "do not break it!" Within hours Vladimir Putin did.

On Sunday a Shahed drone hit a power plant in Kyiv, and the Russians also struck a thermal power plant in

Kharkiv. “This happened after the statement by the President of the United States about a ceasefire in the energy sector,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on Telegram.

Trump announces

a truce. Russia

immediately violates it.

Ukraine refrained from striking Russian refineries overnight, Mr. Zelensky said Monday, and “we are ready to adhere to any energy truce, if Russia is willing to do the same.” Mr. Putin has repeatedly refused.

The Russian dictator is multiplying his aerial attacks on Ukrainian cities and civilians as he has run into difficulties on the battlefield in eastern Ukraine. The Russians have made “near-zero gains since March 2026,” the Institute for the Study of War said last month. In early summer the Ukrainians stymied Russia’s plans for a southern offensive. And Ukraine’s

Operation Vivaldi has now thwarted Russian plans to encircle the eastern defensive stronghold known as the Fortress Belt.

So Mr. Putin's plan now is to “make civilian life in Ukraine unbearable such that Ukraine will capitulate to Russia’s demands,” ISW said this month. Mr. Putin is taking advantage of Ukraine’s

shortage of Patriot missiles and functioning F-16 jets to hammer energy plants ahead of a long winter.

Mr. Trump is scapegoating Ukraine for rising diesel prices, and on Saturday he said Kyiv “better damn well stop” its strikes on Russian refineries. But is Ukraine supposed to sit back and take the Russian blitz? Oil and gas exports fund Mr. Putin’s military, and Russian energy production is a legitimate war target.

Mr. Trump made a major concession Friday with a pause on diesel sanctions that will allow Russian energy companies to rake in some \$4.5 billion. Yet Mr. Putin is giving him nothing we can see in return. The Russian refusal to accept an energy cease-fire is the latest evidence that Mr. Trump's courtship isn't working.

California Has a Home to Sell You

California taxpayers have spent tens of billions of dollars on affordable housing to little productive effect. Yet spe-

cial interests want voters this November to pony up tens of billions more and—get this—establish a state-backed housing lender. Call this the triumph of false hope over experience.

The California Association of Realtors and labor unions are backing Prop. 37, a ballot measure that would authorize the California Housing Finance Agency to issue \$25 billion in government bonds to fund a home down payment assistance program. Another measure (Prop. 1) would authorize \$11.25 billion in bonds to fund affordable housing.

The state wants voters to let it get into the lending subsidy game.

Supporters say the down payment program won't cost taxpayers a dime, but this is misleading. The state would issue bonds to fund loans to cover down payments for buyers of newly constructed homes. Loans could cover as much as $17\%$ of a home's purchase price, so the buyer would only have to put $3\%$ down.

The down payment loan would be a second mortgage, which a buyer would pay off over time. While the program is ostensibly aimed at helping middle-income households, buyers earning up to 200% of an area's median income could qualify for homes costing as much as \$1.5 million. The median is roughly \$400,000 for a family of four in Silicon Valley.

Why is the state program needed given that the federal government already backs mortgages with minimal down payments? The Federal Housing Administration insures mortgages with 3.5% down payments, though borrowers must pay premiums equal to 1.75% of the loan amount, plus a roughly 0.55% annual fee for the life of the loan.

Government-sponsored enterprise Fannie Mae also guarantees mortgages for lower-income households with as little as 3% down, though borrowers generally must pay higher interest rates and insurance premiums. California's program looks to be a subsidy for the relatively affluent who are struggling to afford homes at ethereal prices and today's interest

rates.

The idea seems to be that the state down payment loan would obviate the higher interest rates buyers would otherwise have to pay under federal programs if they put only

3% down. By making a 20% down payment that is mostly funded by a state-backed second mortgage, borrowers could qualify for a lower interest rate.

It's not clear the state could fund down payment loans at rates that are attractive to borrowers without losing money. The state might be able to take advantage of the municipal bond tax exemption to issue bonds and thereby fund down payment loans at below-market rates. Thirty-year tax-exempt muni bonds currently yield around $5.7\%$ .

But the state would still have to factor in the price of the loan's administrative and underwriting costs. Because the down payment loans would be subordinate to a primary mortgage, bond buyers would likely charge a yield premium. While California might set interest rates on down payment loans below its cost of funding, taxpayers would then be stuck subsidizing them.

In any case, subsidizing buyers will push up prices as long as supply remains constrained. Prop. 1 won't help with either. Most of the \$11.25 billion in bonds would fund homeless and multifamily housing, which can cost \$1 million a unit to build because of government building codes, prevailing wage requirements and other regulation.

California voters have approved \$12 billion in bonds for such projects since 2018, which comes on top of nearly \$20 billion in general fund spending. Yet both homelessness and housing costs have increased. Let's hope voters have the wisdom to stop this endless housing-subsidy racket and defeat both propositions.

It's OK if Markets Force Some Colleges to Close

Jeff Yass's op-ed “Pouring Money Into the Ivy League Won’t Solve Its Problems” (Oct. 9) is right on target, but to accommodate new academic ventures, we need the Schumpeterian “creative destruction” so critical to the emergence and triumph of competitive private enterprise capitalism in the U.S. and across the globe. The downsizing or near death of iconic brand names like Sears and Eastman Kodak helped free resources to finance the Anthropic, Nvidia, Apple and other leaders of recent economic progress.

The growing threat of closure is already forcing some existing colleges out of desperation to throttle the administrative bloat that had distracted them from their primary mission of discovering and disseminating knowledge and creative ideas. Some institutions are also considering revising tenure provisions and are even rethinking costly intercollegiate athletic spending. Labor markets are making unemployable majors like gender studies undesirable for students. Some schools are asking professors

---

The Permitting Reform Bill Harms Historic Preservation

If permitting reform passes as your editorial suggests (“Permitting Reform at Last, Really?,” Oct. 6), it will symbolize a larger, disturbing trend taking shape in Washington right now—public policy and federal actions that lack clear process, meaningful public and stakeholder involvement and sound judgement. In particular, the proposed sweeping changes to the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 within the permitting reform bill are unprecedented and go too far. If passed, these provisions would eviscerate our nation’s civic and cultural inheritance. The proposed changes must be rejected. We are eager to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the NHPA on Oct. 15—a foundational law that has stood the test of time and served our country well. Our elected and appointed officials should practice greater deference to our nation’s heritage.

BRENT LEGGS

President and CEO

Natl. Trust for Historic Preservation

Washington to teach more and write fewer articles for last-resort journals. Talk is growing of having three-year instead of four-year bachelor's degrees.

Because of massive taxpayer and private philanthropic subsidies, market signals that lead to needed collegiate resource reallocation are weakened, but they are still present and beginning to work. I share Mr. Yass's enthusiasm for the University of Austin, but I think the death of a few hundred existing schools will scare the rest into promoting less ideologically driven wokeness and instead focus on greater efficiency.

PROF. EM. RICHARD VEDDER

Ohio University

Athens, Ohio

---

Mamdani's Oct. 7 Response

Regarding your editorial “Celebrating Hamas on Oct. 7” (Oct. 8): My mother survived Auschwitz. Throughout her life, she returned to one painful question: “Why didn’t we run away when we still had the chance?” It was the reflection of someone who knew there was a brief window when leaving Europe might still have been possible.

I thought of my mother when reading your editorial regarding New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani's statement on the anniversary of the attacks. While the mayor briefly acknowledged the horror of that day—of those killed and taken hostage—his statement quickly shifted to qualified political context, adding that the suffering “did not begin nor end that day.”

New York isn't 1930s Europe, and I would never diminish what my mother endured. But her life taught me that people don't always recognize when the world begins to shift.

Oct. 7 was a day of slaughter. The mayor has 364 other days a year to complain about occupation and genocide. On this anniversary, that suffering should have stood on its own. Instead, his rhetoric left me wondering if my mother's question has now become mine: Should we think about leaving?

Regarding Joseph C. Sternberg's column “Riots in France? They Could Happen Here” (Political Economics, Oct. 9): The French debt crisis is a perfect example of what can happen when politicians are more concerned with keeping their jobs than doing their jobs. They don't seem to have heard the expression “when you're in a hole, stop digging.”

---

France Keeps Digging a Hole

ROBERT M. SUSSMAN

Paradise Valley, Ariz.

Letters intended for publication should be emailed to wsj.ltrs@wsj.com. Please include your city, state and telephone number. All letters are subject to editing, and unpublished letters cannot be acknowledged.

JACOB ELBOGEN

Brooklyn, N.Y.

---

Pepper ... And Salt

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

"He needed a break from all the emotional support work."

The Case for Firing Squads

By Alex Kozinski

rizona succeeded in killing Joseph Rudolph Wood III on July 23, 2014, the day after the Supreme Court lifted a stay that had been

issued by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The state administered 15 injections of midazolam and hydromorphone over nearly two hours. It was, at the time, the longest execution in U.S. history.

That record is now eclipsed by the failed execution of Christa Pike, who survived two injections of pentobarbital, to the apparent surprise of the Tennessee officials administering them. One can only hope that this disturbing episode will cause reconsideration of our half-century-long experiment with lethal injection, but I'm not so sure. Wood's

---

Lethal injection only looks humane, and it blurs the distinction between healing and killing.

execution generated extensive publicity, including a “60 Minutes” segment in which I, then a Ninth Circuit judge, was interviewed, and then nothing happened. Almost every death-penalty state, along with the federal criminal code, designates lethal injection as the sole or default method of execution.

It wasn't always so. For much of the 20th century, states used hanging, the gas chamber, the electric chair and occasionally firing squads. Then, in 1977, Oklahoma authorized lethal injection. Texas first used it in 1982 when it executed Charles Brooks Jr. The other capital punishment states quickly fell in line.

RICK BOWMER/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Why this sudden transformation? After the Supreme Court struck down all existing death-penalty laws in Furman v. Georgia (1972) for lacking certain procedural safeguards that the justices invented, 35 states retooled their laws to adopt such procedures. In 1977 Utah executed Gary Gilmore by firing squad, the first execution after the moratorium. But opponents continued to challenge executions, including execution methods, as painful or degrading.

Perhaps states thought lethal injection would fare better in court because it resembled a familiar medical procedure. Perhaps they wanted executions to look less medieval. Either way, the appeal was obvious: Put the prisoner on a gurney, attach tubes, administer drugs, and invite the public to imagine that death arrives cleanly and quickly, without anyone getting blood on his hands.

Appearances, however, aren't reality. Lethal injection was a terrible choice, practically and philosophically. It borrows medicine's costume without the people and safeguards that make medicine work. Physicians are barred by the American Medical Association's ethics code from participating in executions; similar constraints apply to nurses. The job therefore falls to law-enforcement personnel, who must obtain the drugs, find a vein, insert a catheter, and administer the substances in the right quantities and sequence. If the first attempt fails, they try again. In Wood's case, 14 times.

The supply problem makes matters worse. Drug manufacturers have refused to sell their products for executions. States have resorted to Rube Goldberg-like schemes to obtain drugs from abroad, sometimes under false pretenses, or have used drugs that are expired or improperly stored. The state wants the appearance of a modern medical procedure but can't reliably obtain the materials or expertise that real medicine requires.

Nor is there an accepted protocol guaranteed to produce a quick, painless death. Drug companies test medications to heal people, not kill them. States have improvised, sometimes using drugs known to cause severe pain and administering sedatives to blunt it. Sedatives don't always work, and there is good reason to believe that some prisoners suffer; Ms. Pike actually told us so. Over the years there have been numerous botched executions, as documented in gruesome detail by law professor Corinna Lain in her recent book, "Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection."

The philosophical problem is more fundamental: Execution by lethal injection is dishonest. It dresses an execution in the reassuring garb of medicine, encouraging us to mistake a state killing for a clinical event. Medicine seeks to preserve life; execution ends it. This blurring of what are diametrically opposite functions is epistemologically perilous and morally repugnant.

Which is why I applaud Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's decision to execute Nidal Hasan by firing squad. As I argued at the time of the Wood execution: "Eight or ten large-caliber rifle bullets fired at close range can inflict massive damage, causing instant death every time. There are plenty of people employed by the state who can pull the trigger and have the training to aim true. The weapons and ammunition are bought by the state in massive quantities for law enforcement purposes, so it would be impossible to interdict the supply. And nobody can argue that the weapons are put to a purpose for which they were not intended: firearms have no purpose other than destroying their targets. Sure, firing squads can be messy, but if we are willing to carry out executions, we should not shield ourselves from the reality that we are shedding human blood. If we, as a society, cannot stomach the splatter from an execution carried out by firing squad, then we shouldn't be carrying out executions at all."

The intervening decade has reinforced my views. Deserving as Mr. Hasan may be of his punishment, no one merits a lingering, possibly excruciating death. I have some doubts whether livestreaming the execution is advisable, but Mr. Hegseth should be commended for his honesty, and for showing Mr. Hasan mercy.

Mr. Kozinski served as a judge on the Ninth Circuit, 1985-2017.

It's the Economy, Stupid—but How Stupid?

The economy, stupid.

EDITOR

AT LARGE

By Gerard

Baker

Since long before James Carville pinned his famous epigram to the wall of Bill Clinton's campaign headquarters in 1992, the reductive formula for success or failure in elections has been obvious: the material condition of the people.

Mr. Carville's maxim was only the second of a triplet (the others were about change and healthcare), but it resonated for the timeless reliability of its psephological predictiveness. When the economy sucks, incumbents lose.

It is the primary pre-explanation for the drubbing Republicans expect next month. But now as then, it may be that a flawed perception of the economy rather than economic reality is driving voting behavior, and that now as then the U.S. is in the early stages of an economic golden age.

By the time Americans voted that November, the recession Gov. Clinton had rhetorically exploited was long over. During the second half of 1992, gross domestic product expanded at an annual rate of 4%. Unemployment peaked that summer and was falling sharply by the time the new president took office.

It's invidious to tell voters that what they believe isn't true; but today, as then, there can be no other explanation for the level of popular dyspepsia with an economy that, in macro terms, is in robust health.

The best sense of how big a disconnect there is between polling and economic facts can be had by comparing President Trump's current ratings with his immediate predecessor's at the nadir of America's recent economic performance.

The latest Quinnipiac poll gives Mr. Trump a 31% approval rating on the economy. In June 2022 Joe Biden enjoyed—if that's the word—a higher rating, 33%.

That month consumer prices were up 9.1% from a year earlier, the highest inflation in 40 years. In the first half of that year, the economy had contracted at a rate of just over 1%. Real wages were falling: Between January 2021, and June

2022, hourly earnings adjusted for inflation had fallen by 4.1%. The rate on a 30-year mortgage had almost doubled, from 2.65% to 5.1%. Average gasoline prices had more than doubled, from \$2.39 a gallon to more than \$5. The S&P 500 index of leading stocks increased just 1% in the first 18 months of the Biden term. The unemployment rate was the one bright spot, at 3.6%.

---

As in 1992, Democrats are poised to win big based on mistaken perceptions that times are difficult.

Contrast that with today. Consumer price inflation is at 3.4%, up since the beginning of Mr. Trump's term but well below where it was four years ago. Gasoline prices and interest rates are up, but not by as much as they had increased under the Democrats. Gasoline is up about 65% since Inauguration Day, at around \$5 a gallon. Mortgage rates are at 7%, just about where they were when Mr. Trump took office.

In the first half of this year growth averaged more than 2.4% a year. The Atlanta Federal Reserve estimates third-quarter growth at 3.6%.

Real wages are up. The S&P 500 is up about 35%. Unemployment is higher than it was four years ago, but at 4.1% still historically low.

In the 1960s Arthur Okun invented the “misery index,” the sum of the inflation and unemployment rates, as a gauge of economic success. On that, Mr. Biden scored 12.7 in June 2022; Mr. Trump 7.5 now. Even if we create an augmented misery index, adding gasoline prices, diesel prices and average mortgage rates, Mr. Biden still comes out “ahead,” 29 to Mr. Trump’s 25.

By just about any measure, the economy is in much better shape today than it was four years ago, yet the incumbent gets lower marks.

There are several plausible explanations. Voters care less about the relative softening in inflation in the past two years and more about the continuing cumulative increase in prices. After decades of almost no inflation, prices have risen by 25% since 2020. The incumbent is paying the price. Voters may also see a clearer link between Mr. Trump's policies and their current challenges than they saw with Mr. Biden. Tariffs and a war that has pushed up energy prices both directly feed higher costs. There is also the sense that the benefits of the current economic strength are distributed even less equally than usual.

Yet as Mr. Clinton's election in the midst of misperceived misery coincided with the start of a long economic boom, so Americans may come to look back on 2026 as the early stages of a period of prolonged prosperity.

Growth is accelerating. Underlying inflation pressures are easing—consumer prices minus food and energy rose by 2.4% during the year ending in August, down from 3.3% when Mr. Trump took office. The artificial-intelligence investment boom is the primary driver of growth, and if the productivity increases investors expect from it materialize, growth may be about to exceed anything we have seen for decades.

Which would give a whole new meaning to “the economy, stupid.”

A Nobel Prize for Macroeconomics Done Right

By David R. Henderson

Robert E. Hall and Michael Woodford have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Economic Science for “microeconomic foundations of macroeconomic stabilisation,” the prize committee said in a statement Monday. Both economists are American. Mr. Hall, 83, is an economics professor at Stanford and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. Mr. Woodford, 70, is an economics professor at Columbia.

Ever since John Maynard Keynes's 1936 classic, “The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money,” which essentially established macroeconomics, economists have debated how governments should stabilize an economy. Keynes believed that during high unemployment, the government should increase aggregate demand for goods and services by temporarily increasing government spending or temporarily decreasing taxes. Keynes also believed that if people’s income increased, they would spend a certain percentage of that increase. Thus, consumer spending could pull an economy out of a recession. Later economists, including 1976 Nobel laureate Milton Friedman, found problems with Keynes's simplistic idea. Mr. Hall built on Friedman's insight.

In his 1957 book, “A Theory of the Consumption Function,” Friedman argued that people wouldn’t base their consumption solely on current income but would instead consume according to what he called “permanent income”—their expectations of future income. Because a temporary cut in taxes wouldn’t have much effect on permanent or long-term income, Friedman argued, such a tax cut wouldn’t increase consumer spending by more than a small percentage of the tax cut.

In a 1978 paper in the Journal of Political Economy, Mr. Hall took the next step. He argued that consumption depends on the expectations of future income, making it hard to predict consumption using past data. This was evidence for Mr. Hall's view that consumers are forward-looking. By definition, people's expectations about the future aren't captured by current data.

In 1982, Mr. Hall and co-author Frederic Mishkin helped pioneer

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. PUBLISHED SINCE 1889 BY DOW JONES & COMPANY

Executive Chairman, News Corp

Rupert Murdoch

Chairman Emeritus, News Corp

Emma Tucker

Editor in Chief

Liz Harris, Managing Editor

David Crow, Deputy Editor in Chief

Aja Whitaker-Moore, Deputy Editor in Chief

Sarah Ball, Features; Elena Cherney, Senior Editor; Dan Colarusso, Business, Finance, Economics; Chip Cummins, Newswires; Taneth Evans, Digital; Gordon Fairclough, World; Samantha Henig, Multimedia; Alex Martin, Print & Writing; Bruce Orwall, Enterprise; Damian Paletta, Washington; Marcelo Prince, Investigations

Michael Woodford's main contributions were on monetary policy. His 2003 book, “Interest and Prices,” has been called a bible for central bankers. Keynesians, up to and including 1970 Nobel laureate Paul Samuelson, argued that mone-

Among Mr. Hall's most important works is his 1985 book, “The Flat Tax,” written with Alvin Rabushka. Messrs. Hall and Rabushka made a strong case for replacing the current income tax with a flat rate and showed that it would be much less distortionary and more pro-growth than our current tax system.

Paul A. Gigot

Editor of the Editorial Page

Gerard Baker, Editor at Large

Robert Thomson

Chief Executive Officer, News Corp

Almar Latour

Chief Executive Officer and Publisher

DOW JONES MANAGEMENT:

Jason P. Conti, General Counsel; Dianne DeSevo, Chief People Officer; Artem Fishman, Chief Technology Officer; M. Scott Havens, Chief Growth Officer; Dan Shar, EVP, General Manager, Wealth & Investing; Ashok Sinha, Chief Communications Officer; Josh Stinchcomb, EVP & Chief Revenue Officer, WSJ/Barron's Group

EDITORIAL AND CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS: 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, N.Y., 10036 Telephone 1-800-DOWJONES

the use of household-level consumption data, rather than solely aggregate data, to study what the Nobel committee calls “the rational-expectations, permanent-income hypothesis.” They found that 20% of households lived “hand to mouth,” but that the consumption behavior of the other 80% was consistent with their forward-looking hypothesis.

DOW JONES | News Corp tary policy was ineffective at lifting economies from recessions. Friedman, on his own and with co-author Anna J. Schwartz, showed that monetary policy, for good and ill, was quite effective. Friedman had

---

Michael Woodford and Robert E. Hall built on Milton Friedman's critique of John Maynard Keynes.

focused on the money supply. Mr. Woodford showed how the Federal Reserve could affect the economy by targeting the federal-funds rate. As Hoover economist John Cochrane notes, the Taylor rule, named for economist John Taylor, is central to the framework Mr. Woodford developed. According to that rule, to reduce inflation, the Fed should aggressively raise interest rates.

The Nobel committee said the prize was awarded for “demonstrating how economic models could be reconstructed to revitalise stabilisation policy.” That leaves out two important points. First, Mr. Hall’s work on consumption shows that using Keynesian fiscal policy wouldn’t work. Second, the work of both Messrs. Hall and Woodford shows how government policy, especially monetary policy, has at times erred and caused instability. The Nobel committee has an unfortunate tendency to attribute implicitly almost all problems of unstable economies to the economies themselves and almost none of the problems to bad government policy. Fortunately, the work of this year’s winners offsets this tendency.

Mr. Henderson is a research fellow with the Stanford University's Hoover Institution and editor of the Concise Encyclopedia of Economics.

Ritual Offers What Medicine Can't

By Maria Balhara

The mother and father stayed close to their child's hospital bed while family members stood quietly nearby. The child wouldn't recover.

How does a parent say goodbye to a child? Who remains present when medicine reaches its limits? Hospitals are filled with people confronting these questions. Clinicians pause silently after deaths. Chaplains perform emergency baptisms in neonatal intensive-care units. Nurses preserve handprints and footprints for grieving families. Music is played at bedsides during extubations. Care teams gather quietly outside rooms before difficult conversations.

I have come to realize that many of these practices share features traditionally associated with ritual: symbolic action, repetition and the marking of transitions often involving uncertainty, vulnerability or death.

Calling these practices rituals can feel strange in modern medicine, a field grounded in science and technical expertise. But the effects of severe illness on patients and their loved ones isn't merely physical. Consider the parent who must navigate uncertainty and anticipatory grief while making decisions for a sick child who can't speak.

Ritualized practices help patients, families and clinicians acknowledge realities that are emotionally and morally significant but difficult to express.

As a chaplaincy trainee, I entered the hospital expecting to encounter ritual in overtly religious settings. I found it woven into ordinary clinical life. Even people who wouldn't describe themselves as religious were among the practitioners.

A physician sitting down to talk at a patient's eye level before delivering devastating news. A nurse calling for the spiritual care team to visit quietly with the mother of a dying child. These rituals won't end disease or suffering, but they aren't trivial. They communicate gravity, respect and the recognition of shared human vulnerability.

Such practices allow clinicians to acknowledge the emotional and moral pressures of their work. In this sense, ritual doesn't exist outside medicine but is essential to humanity in medical practice.

Ms. Balhara is a philosophy major at the University of Pennsylvania and a student chaplain at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

Congratulations

to our 2026

Vendor Partners

of the Year.

Your innovation, expertise and dedication to quality and value are essential to how we show up for our customers. Great things happen when we work together.

metabo HPT

| Top 10 Tom Cruise films by worldwide box office gross | Film Title | Gross (in $ billion) | Top Gun: Maverick | Mission: Impossible - Fallout | Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol | Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation | Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning | War of the Worlds | Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part One | Mission: Impossible II | Mission: Impossible | The Last Samurai | # BUSINESS & FINANCE

© 2026 Dow Jones & Company. All Rights Reserved.

\* \* \* \* \* \*

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.

S&P 7807.24 ▼ 0.06%

Tuesday, October 13, 2026 | B1

See more at WSJ.com/Markets

FTX's Assets Are Part of AI Boom

Various holdings, previously seen as bad investments, draw new interest

BY ALEXANDER OSIPOVICH

A bitcoin-mining business that appeared left for dead after the collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried's crypto empire is being resuscitated to serve the artificial-intelligence build-out.

The business, previously known as Genesis Digital Assets, had been snarled for years in the FTX bankruptcy process. It was taken over this summer by SWI Group, a digital-infrastructure company that has been buying up data centers in the U.S. and Europe to serve AI companies hungry for computing power.

SWI announced Monday that it has raised €800 million, or around \$900 million, to fund the upgrading and expansion of its data centers. Shares of the Amsterdam-listed, Singapore-incorporated company rose 16% after the deal was announced, giving it a market capitalization of around \$6.9 billion.

“We need capital to deploy more compute,” said Max-Hervé George, co-founder and chief executive of SWI. He added that he had “zero interest” in bitcoin mining.

What his firm is interested in: the data centers in Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina and Sweden it bought with Genesis Digital. SWI hopes to put them at the service of the so-called hyperscalers—cloud-computing providers such as Amazon Web Services or Google Cloud, which provide much of the computing firepower behind ChatGPT and similar AI tools.

While Genesis Digital originally focused on bitcoin mining in Kazakhstan, it later pulled back from the central Asian country. SWI is in the process of selling its last remaining assets in Kazakhstan, a group of three small bitcoin-mining sites, George said.

Bitcoin mining involves running programs to solve complex mathematical equations to generate new units of the digital currency. Originally done by enthusiasts on their personal computers, it eventually grew into a big business, with companies amassing racks of Nvidia chips to mine bitcoin on an industrial scale.

Many of those companies have lately pivoted to AI, which promises more lucrative returns.

George, a 37-year-old French entrepreneur, started out investing in distressed real-estate properties before pivoting to data centers.

But few assets he has tackled have as thorny a history as

Genesis Digital.

Founded in 2017 by a group of German and Kazakh entrepreneurs, it grew into one of the world's largest bitcoin miners.

Bankman-Fried got involved starting in 2021. He ultimately invested more than \$1 billion in Genesis Digital through his cryptocurrency trading firm, Alameda Research, which ended up with a 20% stake in the company. Alameda was closely intertwined with FTX.

By the time FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022, Genesis Digital was struggling with a deep slump in bitcoin prices and hostility in Kazakh-Please turn to page B2

‘Digger’ Misfire Upends Cruise’s Oscar Hunt

BY JOHN JURGENSEN

AND ESTHER ZUCKERMAN

The high-concept satire sold just \$8 million of domestic tickets in its opening weekend against its \$125 million cost.

In June, the first glimpse of Tom Cruise's newest movie appeared with a surprising prologue—a highlight reel spanning his entire career.

It was a 2½-minute show-case of the range and charisma of the world's biggest movie star, building to a line from a “Mission: Impossible” movie: “Everything you’ve done has come to this.”

Cut to Cruise as a bombastic oil baron in “Digger,” encased in prosthetics, sounding off with a Texas drawl and firing a finger gun. One of the top comments on YouTube: “my man is coming for the Oscar.”

Then “Digger” landed with a thud.

The high-concept satire from writer-director Alejandro González Iñárritu, which cost about \$125 million to make, sold just \$8 million worth of tickets at more than 3,300 domestic theaters its opening weekend.

That unleashed the kind of “bomb” and “flop” headlines that haven’t haunted a Cruise release since “The Mummy” in 2017. It also put what had seemed like an inevitable run to the Academy Awards in question—and made that celebratory career montage look premature.

“That’s when it felt like they were trying too hard to get Tom a nomination,” said Hollywood marketing veteran Dennis Rice, who worked with Cruise when the actor helped revive the United Artists studio in the 2000s.

Cruise holds a Guinness World Record for most consecutive \$100 million-grossing movies by an actor (11). He has executed movie stunts other actors would never consider. He is frequently referred to as "the last movie star." Hoisting that golden trophy for his acting is one of the only Hollywood milestones that Cruise has yet to achieve.

"It's his Everest," said Jeff Benedict, author of a forthcoming biography of the star.

Cruise has three acting nominations: for playing a firebrand, wheelchair-using Vietnam War vet in “Born on the Fourth of July” (1989), a gung-ho sports agent in “Jerry Maguire” (1996), and a motivational guru in “Magnolia” (1999). He also received a best picture nod as a producer of “Top Gun: Maverick” (2022).

Yet the only Oscar actually in his possession is an honorary one for his 45-year career. "Making films is not what I do," he said in accepting it last year, "it is who I am."

Though he devoted the 2020s to spectacle, Cruise has demonstrated his range as a serious, awards-worthy actor since the 1980s, when he took roles supporting Paul Newman in “The Color of Money” and Dustin Hoffman in “Rain Man.” (Both leading actors walked away with Oscars for their performances.)

Later came his psychosexual turn in “Eyes Wide Shut” by revered director Stanley Kubrick; a leap into pure comedy, bald cap and all, in “Tropic Thunder,” and steely villainy in “Collateral,” among other performances that won him critical respect.

Yet the Academy never bought in. "I believe Tom's one of the greatest actors of our industry, but because he's also a commercial actor, he sometimes doesn't get the recogni-

Please turn to page B2

Source: Rentrak

Annuity Buyers Sue Walter Insurance Companies

BY HEATHER GILLERS

Lawsuits are piling up against Dodgers owner Mark Walter brought by senior citizens who bought annuities from his insurance companies.

A suit filed Monday is at least the third to allege Walter and his insurers sold annuities based on misrepresentations and false promises. The suits, brought by class-action lawyers seeking to represent a larger group of policyholders, come after two of Walter's insurers disclosed in June that they were under federal investigation for failing to report how much of their portfolio was deployed as loans to other companies connected to Walter's sports-and-financial empire.

Rick Phillips, a Los Angeles-area retiree, filed suit on Monday asking policyholders at two Walter insurers, Clear Spring and Gainbridge, be let out of their annuity contracts without penalty or reimbursed for the difference between what they paid and cheaper price the companies might have had to accept had they been upfront about the extent of their affiliated investments.

Annuities were designed to appeal to older people who live on fixed incomes and have little appetite for risk. Indexed annuities, which offer policyholders the potential for stock-market-like gains, surged in popularity over the past decade, helping fuel the private lending of alternative asset managers.

On Wednesday, Robert Kalinsky, a 76-year-old Davie, Fla., resident, filed a separate lawsuit against Clear Spring and another Walter insurer, Delaware Life, also for misrepresenting the extent of their affiliated assets. Another Delaware Life annuity policyholder, Ira Rosner, filed his own lawsuit last month.

Walter's conglomerate, TWG Global, has said there was no fraud at either his Wall Street firm Guggenheim Partners or at his insurers.

A spokesman for the insurers' parent, Group 1001, said the firm is aware of recent lawsuits. "No court has ruled that Group 1001 Insurance or Delaware Life Insurance Company did anything wrong, and we intend to defend the case vigorously, consistent with our long track record of serving policyholders with integrity," the firm said.

Delaware Life and Clear Spring disclosed in June that they had dramatically understated their share of so-called Please turn to page B2

A Credit-Score Shift Shakes Up Mortgages

BY JASMINE LI

AND ANNAMARIA ANDRIOTIS

FICO credit scores played a critical role in determining homeownership for many Americans for decades. Now the mortgage industry is embracing another metric.

Regulators and lenders recently opened the door to using VantageScore, a joint venture by credit-reporting firms Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, for their mortgage-underwriting decisions. It is the latest chapter in the Federal Housing Finance Agency's crusade against Fair Isaac's near-monopoly over the \$13 trillion mortgage market—one that sent the company's stock down about 60% this year.

The FHFA is the overseer of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which backstop much of the market and therefore set the standards for home lending. FHFA chief Bill Pulte and President Trump have been trying to lower mortgage costs and increase home affordability,

SZWARC HENRI/ABACA/ZUMA PRESS

combating mortgage rates that have climbed to their highest levels in years just before the midterm elections. The administration says the credit-score change will make it easier and cheaper to get a mortgage.

Pulte has more in store for the industries, including changing longstanding requirements around credit reports, according to a person familiar with the matter.

“We do not care who wins,” Pulte said on X in late September. “We just want [FICO] and Vantage to compete—not be a cartel or abusive monopolies.”

Making home-buying more affordable is a monumental task filled with potential pitfalls and unintended consequences. So far, the market is seeing the score changes as increasing risk, and there are early indications that it is leading to higher rates on some mortgages.

The FHFA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac all said in statements that the changes would modernize the credit-scoring Please turn to page B2

AUTOS

Technology-loaded

Chinese cars are

powering the Paris

Motor Show. B3

TECHNOLOGY

Dating app company

Bumble is in talks to go

private in a deal valuing

it at \$1 billion. B4

Albertsons Wants Kroger to Pay \$8 Billion After Failed Merger

Share-price performance, past five years

BY PATRICK THOMAS

Supermarket chain Albertsons wants its top rival Kroger to pay it at least \$8 billion after their grocery megadeal imploded two years ago.

Albertsons is accusing Kroger leaders of making “lowball offers” to federal regulators to largely keep the most-profitable stores in the combined company, and hive off the weaker-performing ones, according to a court filing unsealed Monday.

The filing is part of Albertsons' lawsuit against Kroger in Delaware Chancery Court following the companies' failed deal. A bench trial is slated to begin Oct. 19 and the proceeding is expected to last about two weeks.

Albertsons said it is seeking lost merger premiums and interest totaling as much as \$9.3 billion. The amount includes a \$600 million breakup fee that Kroger

Source: FactSet

hasn't paid.

Kroger said Albertsons' arguments are "fatally flawed" and that both companies knew the deal faced high regulatory scrutiny. "There was nothing Kroger could have done that would have made a difference," the company said in a court filing.

The trial reflects the journey that Kroger and Albertsons have taken from industry rivals to potential merger partners to competitors again over four years.

Since the deal fell apart, both companies have struggled. Grocers are reeling from rising costs, while cash-strapped shoppers cut back Please turn to page B2

---

INDEX TO BUSINESSES

These indexes cite notable references to most parent companies and businesspeople in today's edition. Articles on regional page inserts aren't cited in these indexes.

A

Airbnb B10

Albertsons B1

Amazon.com A11,B2,B10

American Airlines A11

B

Beyond Meat B4

Blackstone B4

Booking B10

Bumble B4

BYD B3

C

Chery Automobile B3

D

Delta Air Lines A11

E

Equifax B1

Expedia B10

Experian B1

F

Fair Isaac B1

Ford Motor B3

G

Geely Automobile B3

Getty Images.....B4

Guangzhou Automobile...B3

H

Hermès.....B5

Hilton Worldwide.....B10

I

IonQ.....B5

K

Kering.....B5

Keurig Dr Pepper.....B4

Kroger.....B1

L

Li Auto.....B3

Lucid.....B3

LVMH.....B5

Lyft.....A3

M

Marriott.....B10

Match.....B4

Meta Platforms.....B3,B10

N

Nvidia.....B1

R

Rocket.....B2

A

Antonio, William.....A10

B

Banfield, Bill.....B2

Bankman-Fried, Sam.....B1

Bernard, Adam.....B3

Brown, Ethan.....B4

Buchta, Scott.....B2

C

Cabanis, Cecile.....B5

Chesky, Brian.....B10

Clarke, Richard.....B10

D

Dacus, Stephen.....B4

F

Foran, Greg.....B2

G

---

INDEX TO PEOPLE

S

SAIC Motor.....B3

Seres.....B3

Seven & i.....B4

Southwest Airlines.....A11

SpaceX.....A3

Stellantis.....B3

SWI.....B1

T

Tesla.....B3

TransUnion.....B1

U

Uber Technologies.....A3

United Airlines.....A11

UWM.....B2

V

Volkswagen.....B3

W

Walmart.....B2

X

XPeng.....B3

Z

Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology.....B3

Gawrelski, Ken.....B10

George, Max-Hervé.....B1

Gupta, Ravi.....B4

H

Hall, Robert E.....A2

Hegeman, John.....B4

Hunt, Hunter.....A10

K

Kang, Clifford.....B3

L

Leyva, Mauricio.....B4

M

Marshall, John.....A2

Masi, Niccolo de.....B5

Mazzola, Joe.....A2

Miller, Andrew.....A10

Musk, Elon.....A3

N

Nan, Alex.....B3

S

Seiberg, Jaret.....B2

Smith, Desmond P.....B2

U

Ulzheimer, John.....B2

W

Walter, Mark.....B1

Wang, Alexandr.....B3

Weiss, Emily.....B4

Winebrenner, James.....B5

Wolfe Herd, Whitney.....B4

Woodford, Michael.....A2

X

Xiaopeng, He.....B3

Z

Zuckerberg, Mark.....B3

Zyciora, Klaus.....B3

Annuity Buyers Sue Insurers

Continued from page B1

Continued from page 81 affiliated assets in their first-quarter filings. When the two insurers restated those figures, the share of their holdings parked in affiliated investments rose from single-digit percentages to $59\%$ at Clear Spring and $42\%$ at Delaware Life, according to Wall Street Journal calculations based on state insurance filings. The firms said they discovered the extent of their affiliated investments after coming under investigation by federal prosecutors in New York and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Gainbridge said in its filing that it was cooperating with investigators in the probe.

Affiliated holdings can refer to money lent to connected companies or investments sold by them but backed by other borrowers. The money parked in those investments at Delaware Life and Clear Spring represents the savings of hundreds of thousands of Americans, including Phillips and Kalinsky. Group 1001 Insurance, the parent for all three insurers, said it had nearly 500,000 active annuity contracts as of year-end 2024.

Rosner bought his annuity after Delaware Life received a subpoena from federal prosecutors but before the insurer disclosed that it was under investigation, according to the suit, and when he learned about the probe, he cashed out early, paying a penalty for doing so. Kalinsky surrendered one of his annuities and continued to hold on to the other two. Both suits were filed in the Southern District of Florida by a Boca Raton, Fla., firm, Robbins, Geller, Rudman and Dowd.

Phillips owns one annuity from Clear Spring and multiple annuities from Gainbridge. He was featured in a Wall Street Journal article about annuitants who hold policies from Walter's insurers. The attorney filing the case, George Zelcs of St. Louis-based Korein Tillery, reached out to Phillips after reading about him in the Journal and filed the case in the Southern District of Indiana where Clear Spring has offices.

This isn't the first time Mark Walter and his companies faced legal complaints from those who bought his annuities. In 2014, two policyholders brought a class-action lawsuit against Guggenheim Partners, where he is chief executive, and several affiliated insurers. They accused Guggenheim of turning the insurers into “a cash machine” that used policyholder money to buy the Dodgers.

Cruise's Oscar Hunt Takes a Hit

Continued from page B1

tion he deserves," Rice said.

Over the past decade, however, Cruise has hit something like exalted status, not just for being a movie star with longevity at 64 but for being such a booster for the theatrical experience itself, especially around the time “Top Gun: Maverick” helped bring people back into theaters following the pandemic shutdown.

“Digger” doesn’t go down easy as Oscar bait. Cruise’s tycoon character spins the narrative around global cataclysm caused by his drilling, wrapping comedy around the film’s doom and gloom message about the climate crisis. The movie also hinges on a major twist that Warner Bros. worked to keep secret, making it challenging to discuss Cruise’s performance in full.

“I think he chose the riskiest project you could,” said Amy Nicholson, a film critic and author of a book on

Cruise. “If there’s one genre that always seems to struggle in the year that it’s released, it’s a pointed contemporary climate change satire.”

In a counteroffensive to the many negative reviews for the film, Warner Bros. created ads that juxtaposed critics' takes ("magnificent," "insufferable") as a way to draw out potential ticket buyers with the message, "Decide for yourself." Warner Bros. didn't respond to a request for comment.

The movie has its defenders, plus a growing number of celebrity champions, from Jane Fonda to Mandy Patinkin. Anne Hathaway, Cruise's costar on the coming sequel to 1990's "Days of Thunder," posted "loved this brilliant movie" on the film-centric social media app Letterboxd, giving "Digger" five stars.

It's the kind of Hollywood support that implies an Oscar nomination is still on the table, even if the possibility of a win seems more difficult now.

He faces stiff competition in the best actor race that includes Matt Damon for “The Odyssey,” which premiered over the summer, as well as forthcoming contenders John Malkovich for “Wild Horse Nine” and Andrew Scott for “Elsinore.”

FTX Assets Are Drawing New Interest

Continued from page B1

stan, where the local government had soured on bitcoin miners over their heavy use of electricity.

Genesis Digital was “one of Bankman-Fried’s most reckless investments,” the team managing FTX’s bankruptcy said in a lawsuit filed against the bitcoin-mining company last year, seeking to claw back the \$1.15 billion that Alameda had spent.

Max-Hervé George, chief executive of SWI Group.

The FTX administrators argued that Genesis Digital's assets in Kazakhstan were "virtually worthless," while its U.S. assets were "worth only a fraction of what Bankman-Fried paid."

FTX dropped its lawsuit on June 15. That same day, SWI announced it had spent \$500 million on a major stake in Genesis Digital. Since then, it has expanded its stake to become the company's majority owner.

All the legal disputes relating to FTX and other shareholders have been settled, George said.

Bankman-Fried is serving a 25-year prison sentence after being convicted of fraud.

Today, some of his investments appear better in hindsight than they did when FTX failed and prosecutors accused him of misappropriating billions of dollars in customer funds to go on a huge spending spree.

Notably, he invested \$500 million in Anthropic in 2021, giving FTX a stake of 7.8% in the startup before the AI boom turned it into a household name.

The FTX bankruptcy estate sold its stake in Anthropic for \$1.3 billion in 2024. Based on the AI company's last valuation, that stake would now be worth about \$75 billion.

Albertsons Seeks \$8 Billion

Continued from page B1 on their habits and flock to rival discount stores.

On Monday, Kroger said it is planning to cut 3,000 employees over the next three years, reducing its total corporate workforce by more than a third. Chief Executive Greg Foran said in a note to employees that Kroger is using new technology, including artificial intelligence, to do more with fewer people. "Our company has more layers, more handoffs and more overhead than we need," he said.

A Phoenix Albertsons store. The grocer's proposed merger with Kroger collapsed in 2024.

Shares in Albertsons are down about 30% over the past 12 months, bringing its market value to around \$6 billion.

Kroger in 2022 agreed to buy Albertsons for \$20 billion, uniting the No. 1 and No. 2 U.S. supermarket chains by store count. The combined company would have nearly 5,000 stores under Kroger banners including Fred Meyer, Roundy's and Mariano's with the owner of Safeway, Vons and Jewel-Osco.

The goal was to create a bigger grocery competitor to megaretailers such as Walmart and Amazon and discount grocers like Aldi, which have the scale and buying power to undercut supermarket shelf prices.

To ease concerns about the deal, the companies offered to sell hundreds of stores to grocery distributor C&S Wholesale Grocers. The Federal Trade Commission sued in 2024 to block the deal, claiming that reduced competition would raise grocery prices.

A Portland, Ore., federal court judge later blocked the deal on antitrust grounds. The day after the ruling, Albertsons sued its former deal partner, alleging Kroger didn't do enough to secure regulatory approval. Kroger has said Albertsons isn't owed a breakup fee.

A Portland, Ore., federal court judge later blocked the deal on antitrust grounds. The day after the ruling, Albertsons sued its former deal partner, alleging Kroger didn't do enough to secure regulatory approval. Kroger has called Albertsons' claims baseless and said that the company isn't owed the breakup fee.

Both companies have about \$1 billion each on deal-related costs, including lawyer and consulting fees.

In its court filing, Albertsons said Kroger leadership gave priority to keeping stores that would help it hit specific financial targets once it completed its deal to acquire Albertsons' more than 2,000 stores. It pointed to a \$400 million bonus pool that then-CEO Rodney McMullen established for executives based on profit targets after the deal closed.

Credit-Score Shift Shakes Mortgages

Kroger said that its divestment proposals were economically sound and had strong economic incentives to close the deal, according to court documents. It also said Albertsons developed a “Plan B” to sue if the merger failed to close.

Continued from page B1

system, making it more predictive, and create a safer and sounder market.

The changes have been brewing for the past year but kicked into gear last month when Pulte directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to approve all lenders to use VantageScore 4.0. The mortgage-lending industry, which is dominated by nonbanks, got on board quickly. Rocket Mortgage, the nation's largest lender, said die charge based on borrowers' credit score and loan size compared with the value of the house they are financing.

The administration is now adding VantageScore to the equation. One iteration, released in early September, treated the scores as different. For instance, a 720 VantageScore should be thought of as a 700 FICO, the grid showed.

Then at the end of September, Pulte erased that differential. He said there would be one set of pricing grids that treat FICO and VantageScore equally. "We are Simplifying Mortgage Pricing following feedback from lenders and consumers," he wrote on X.

It was akin to waving a magic wand and allows the lenders to choose the highest score available.

tember that pulled both scores. On the mortgages that Rocket originated, VantageScore 4.0 ran 11 to 12 points higher than FICO Classic on average, he said. "What that meant, in the most simplest terms, was that the vast majority of people got the same price or a slightly better price by using VantageScore," he said.

Mortgage-bond investors who buy bonds from Fannie

So far, the market isn't treating the scores as equal.

and Freddie are worried about their own models and “if they are being compensated for risk,” said Scott Buchta, head of fixed-income strategy at investment bank Brean Capital.

An analysis by Milliman found that during the pilot period, borrowers with similar credit-score ranges were charged a higher rate—up to 0.2 percentage point more—when their loans were originated using VantageScore instead of FICO.

The changes were brewing for the past year but kicked into gear last month.

it would use VantageScore as its preferred scoring model over FICO. United Wholesale Mortgage said it would pull both scores and use the higher one. And PennyMac said it deployed VantageScore across tageScore across its businesses.

"We want to give our brokers, and therefore our consumers, the ability to get the best of whatever is available to them," said Desmond P. Smith, chief growth officer at UWM.

Nearly \$4 billion of Fannie and Freddie mortgages were originated with VantageScore 4.0 in August, when some lenders were piloting the new score, up from \$8 million in April, according to an analysis by consulting firm Milliman.

Roughly 3% of the \$400 billion that Fannie and Freddie sold into securitizations in the six months through September was tied to VantageScore, up from essentially zero, according to trade publication Inside Mortgage Finance.

At the core of the change are pricing grids meant to assess risk that Fannie and Freddie rolled out during the 2008 housing crisis. The grids determine the fees Fannie and Fred-

FICO and VantageScore credit scores are crunched off different algorithms and with different data. In general, the FICO score that has long been used for Fannie and Freddie is a tougher bar for consumers to clear. For example, it requires that consumers have a lengthier credit history—about six months—than the VantageScore version.

“I question whether or not Pulte knows what he’s doing,” said John Alzheimer, who has worked for FICO and VantageScore. “It’s like Fahrenheit and Celsius—to some extent you’re never going to have the same output.”

A 20-point drop in a FICO score increases the chances of default by 40% to 50%, according to FICO.

“If one believes the prior grids accurately measured risk, then this means Fannie and Freddie are taking on more risk with each VantageScore loan without being compensated,” TD Cowen analyst Jaret Seiberg wrote in a report.

Bill Banfield, chief business officer at Rocket, said the company ran 1.4 million credit reports from May through Sep-

Simplicity. Security. Stability.

Annuities for people who value principal protection, predictable outcomes and straight talk.

ManhattanLife, Standing By You. Since 1850.

Meta Says New AI Model to Boost Agent

Muse Wonder comes as downloads slow for Muse, company's personal assistant

BY MEGHAN BOBROWSKY

Meta Platforms released a new artificial-intelligence model on Monday it says vaults the company to the AI frontier, a goal it established last year when it created Meta

Superintelligence Labs.

One important test of the model, called Muse Wonder, will be how much it can improve retention and accelerate adoption of Muse, the company's new personal-assistant agent introduced last month.

Muse has amassed nearly nine million global downloads since its release. But downloads have started to slow and its retention lags behind that of ChatGPT after 14 days, Sensor Tower data shows.

"Some people have a pretty clear sense of what they want to use the product for or how it can improve their lives," Alexandr Wang, Meta's AI chief, said in an interview. "Other folks who maybe are less familiar with AI or agents may not understand that, and for them, I think it's more of a hurdle to get on board."

The new model, which Meta says performs better than OpenAI's Astra and Anthropic's Fable on several tests, will soon power Muse for subscribers of both the \$20 a month and \$100 a month tiers. It includes better memory, better focus to help users tackle challenging goals, and more expertise in the health, finance and legal fields, Meta said.

“We think it is competitive as a frontier model with the very best models that are out there,” Wang said. “But in addition to that, it also is specifically the very best model for personal and professional agents and will be the best model to power an experience like Muse."

Meta's stock climbed $3\%$ on Monday.

Meta overhauled its AI efforts in spring 2025 after the disappointing launch of its then-latest model, Llama 4. Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg hired Wang from Scale AI to lead the effort at newly created Meta Superintelligence Labs with a vision of providing so-called “personal superintelligence" to its billions of users. That goal has emerged in the form of Muse, which Zuckerberg said last month is the "centerpiece" of what the company is building.

OpenAI released Dots, a competing AI agent, at its annual developer conference nearly two weeks ago. Google offers an agent called Gemini Spark, and startup Instinct has also launched its own buzzy agent that has emerged as the main competitor to Muse so far.

The China Passenger Car Association attributed the weakness to shrinking demand for autos powered by traditional fuels.

China's Monthly Auto Sales Fall 28%

BY JIAHUI HUANG

China's monthly auto sales weakened yet again in September, with the traditional peak season failing to bring cheer.

Retail sales of passenger cars fell 28% in September from a year earlier to 1.62 million units, the China Passenger Car Association said Monday. Sales rose 5% compared with August.

After 12 consecutive months of declines, the country failed to report a recovery in sales in September, the start of the traditional peak season.

The association attributed the weakness to shrinking demand for cars powered by traditional fuels, as high oil prices and overall weak consumption sentiment in China damped consumer sentiment.

Higher memory-chip costs also are slowing the pace of new vehicle launches in China, weighing on overall sales, the CPCA added.

After years of rapid expansion and strong sales a year earlier, China's auto market has been going through a slow period with some early signs of consolidation.

Last month, Guangzhou Automobile Group said it would acquire a 50% stake in FAW Toyota from FAW Group. Geely and NIO also reached a battery swapping and charging partnership.

Sales of new-energy vehicles, which comprise electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids, as well as exports have become the major themes in China's auto market.

NEV cars accounted for a record 67% of total car sales in September, the agency said. However, retail sales of new-energy cars fell 17% to 1.08 million units in September.

To offset slowing demand in China's market, many Chinese automakers have turned to overseas markets for growth.

In September, exports of China's NEVs more than doubled again. Exports of passenger cars rose $74\%$ to 917,000 units last month, CPCA data showed.

In September, Tesla exported 30,529 units made at its Shanghai plant and sold 95,366 units.

The CPCA doesn't expect a strong recovery in China's auto sales in October. The overall consumption sentiment remains weak for Chinese residents, and they tend to remain on the sidelines instead of making purchase decisions amid price wars among Chinese automakers. Demographic changes and high oil prices also could hurt sales.

Exports also are expected to slow because of trade pressure in the European Union, the agency said.

VW Deliveries Fall on Lingering China Weakness

BY DOMINIC CHOPPING and range-extender models, it said.

Volkswagen Group vehicle deliveries fell in the third quarter as the German automaker continued to suffer from a deteriorating market in China.

includes VW, Porsche, said Monday that group vehicle deliveries fell 14% on year to 1.89 million.

The company, which houses a stable of brands that includes VW, Audi and

"The Volkswagen Group was unable to escape the significant decline in the Chinese total market,

Deliveries in China fell 39% in the quarter to 405,800 vehicles.

particularly in the combustion-engine vehicle business," it said.

Deliveries in China fell $39\%$ in the quarter to 405,800 vehicles, despite increasing demand for the company's second-generation plug-in hybrid

\*Excludes China

The company saw deliveries drop across all of its regions except Central and Eastern Europe, with Western Europe deliveries falling 2.8% and North America deliveries dropping 5.8%.

Globally, deliveries of the group's all-electric vehicles

fell 4.7% on year to 240,200, with Europe the only region showing growth.

"In our home market, we are seeing a significantly accelerated trend towards all-electric ve-"

hicles," said Martin Sander, member of the group's extended executive committee for sales. "The main reasons for this are the currently high fuel prices and the wider range of entry-level models."

Source: the company

The Paris Motor Show Is Now Being Powered by Chinese Cars

BYD executive vice president Stella Li and Stellantis vice president John Elkann at the Paris Motor Show on Monday.

BY STEPHEN WILMOT

AND RYAN FELTON

PARIS—Li Auto, a Beijing-based luxury carmaker, used this city's auto show to show off a car with massage seats at the front, a 21-inch screen for passengers in the back and a unit in the central console that can keep your energy drink cool or your coffee warm.

Meanwhile, BYD, the world's bestselling electric-vehicle brand, took the veil off an SUV for Europe that can fill up much of a battery in five minutes.

And not to be outdone, XPeng touted a test of autonomous-driving technology it conducted around the Arc de Triomphe, the 19th century monument commissioned by Napoleon Bonaparte on the Champs-Elysées. The vehicle, an SUV outfitted with tech that was supervised by a driver, was up for the task, Chief Executive He Xiaopeng said at an event Sunday.

Welcome to the Paris Motor Show—though, this year, one could be forgiven for mistaking it for a China auto show. In total, around 20 Chinese vehicle brands had stands, representing one-third of all brands here. That is second to Europe and up from nine when the show last took place two years ago.

Three American brands were represented: Tesla, Ford Motor and Lucid.

The Chinese automakers helped make Europe's biggest car show much more buzzy than its U.S. counterparts. Unlike recent events in Detroit and Los Angeles, the Paris show consistently had throngs of attendees crowded around stages to witness the debut of new vehicles. Carmakers held news conferences back-to-back, sometimes overlapping, as Chinese executives played up their plans to increase manufacturing in Europe.

“They are looking to not only sell here, but be perceived as good citizens,” said Adam Bernard, a U.S.-based automotive consultant.

Chinese automakers are accelerating their sales across Europe by offering vehicles packed with high-end features at competitive prices. They accounted for 11.3% of all sales in the year through August, up from 7.1% in the same period of last year.

The shift is among the reasons for a wave of job cuts among European automakers, alarming political leaders and accelerating negotiations between Brussels and Beijing.

On Friday, the European Union and China reached a deal that the bloc said could halve its imports of Chinese hybrid vehicles. The EU will impose an annual quota of 350,000 units in the first year, EU officials said Monday, adding that the amount can increase by 6% in each of the following three years.

French President Emmanuel Macron personally sought to inject a dose of European flair into the show. Macron admired a prototype all-electric version of Citroen's 2CV model, a classic of the French company and a fixture of European streets in the postwar era. Like other long-established European car-makers, Stellantis, which owns Citroën, is leaning in to its 20th century heritage in response to the wave of 21st century startups from China.

So far, brands owned by five companies account for most of Chinese imports into Europe: BYD, Chery, SAIC, Geely and

Leapmotor, which is expanding through a joint venture with Jeep owner Stellantis.

State-owned Changan, China's fourth-largest automaker, is following their lead. It has a target of selling 1.5 million vehicles outside China by 2030, more than twice last year's total. The company said it hoped to sell 100,000 vehicles in Europe next year, up from a target of 30,000 in 2026.

“We aim high,” said Klaus Zyciora, Changan’s global executive adviser.

Chinese carmakers also are trying to edge out European brands in their closely guarded luxury market. The Aito brand made by Seres Group announced that it would launch in Europe in the fall of 2027.

“Chinese companies are known for their cost efficiency. Convincing customers that we can also do luxury will take time. But we will get there,” said Clifford Kang, a Seres board member.

Chinese cars are essentially shut out of the U.S. by high tariffs and software restrictions, but President Trump last month repeated comments that he would welcome them if they were locally built, alarming Detroit. Congress is debating a legislative ban of Chinese cars.

John Bozzella, president of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, the top U.S. car-industry group, said: “Europe is a cautionary tale for the U.S. What American policymakers are trying to do is address the issue up front.”

Chinese cars got their foot-hold in Europe partly by exploiting an inadvertent loophole created in Brussels. Officials in 2024 excluded plugin hybrids from additional European Union tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. Chinese brands pivoted to selling those models and have since seized a disproportionate market share of a vehicle type that has emerged as a sweet spot for consumers looking for fuel economy without compromises.

European nations are hesitant to totally shut off China from its market, fearing retaliatory measures by Beijing. The continent relies on exports much more heavily than the U.S.

“I’ve got to make sure I’m protecting my export markets,” said U.K. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds in a recent interview.

The U.K., like the EU, has been flooded with Chinese cars, including a model made by Chery's Jaecoo brand that became the bestselling vehicle in September.

Chinese companies are starting to localize production to avoid tariffs and smooth relations. “In Europe for Europe” was a slogan touted by many Chinese automakers at the show.

At a Sunday evening gala inside a floating art museum on the Seine River, industry executives mingled over drinks and a live jazz band while locals passed by on runs along the water. "For Geely, globalization is not a solo sprint," Alex Nan, vice president of Geely Auto, told the audience. "It is a marathon we run side by side with our partners."

EU Aims to Curb Chinese Hybrids

The European Union aims to curb a surge of Chinese hybrid cars being shipped to the bloc by capping imports from the country at 350,000 units a year, a senior EU official said after both sides made progress in trade talks earlier this month.

Under the plans, the EU will seek to curb Chinese hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicle imports over the next four years, with the aim of more than halving China's projected shipments to the bloc, the official said Monday, adding that the safeguarding measure could take effect in early December.

The cap also will include a fixed annual increase limit of 6%.

The 27-member bloc imported roughly 107,000 hybrid cars from China in 2024 and around 302,000 in 2025, according to Eurostat data. The EU official said that figure could reach up to 800,000 units in 2026.

European officials are seeking to rebalance the 27-member bloc's relationship with China over concerns of a surge in cheaper imports from the country.

—Edith Hancock

Bumble in Advanced Talks to Go Private

Founder Wolfe Herd

expected to stay

involved with

company in deal

BY CARA LOMBARDO

Bumble, the dating-app company founded by Whitney Wolfe Herd, is in advanced talks to be taken private in a deal that values it at roughly \$1 billion, according to people familiar with the matter.

The buyer is Ithaca Holdings, a firm founded recently by two Silicon Valley executives, the people said. Bumble would be one of the first major moves for Ithaca, which plans to apply advanced technologies including artificial intelligence to its investments.

Bumble had a market value of around \$335 million as of Friday's close. Its shares have dropped over 90% since it went public in 2021.

Wolfe Herd founded Bumble in 2014 after having co-founded Match Group's Tinder. She is expected to roll at least part of her stake in the dating app as part of the deal and remain involved with the company, the people said.

Private-equity firm Blackstone was one of Bumble's early backers and bought a majority stake in 2019. It sold much of its stake down following Bumble's IPO but still owns a roughly $14\%$ stake, according to FactSet.

A deal could come as soon as this week, assuming talks don't fall apart.

When Wolfe Herd founded Bumble, she sought to turn the traditional dating dynamic on its head by creating a platform on which women initiate conversations. The idea created buzz, with the company's market value peaking at above \$14 billion following its IPO.

But Bumble and other dating-app companies including Match Group have struggled as younger users are increasingly turned off by online dating platforms. Wolfe Herd returned as Bumble's CEO in 2025, and a few months later the company laid off roughly $30\%$ of its staff.

At Match, increased revenue from dating app Hinge partly offset roughly flat revenue from Tinder, its largest app, in the second quarter.

At Bumble, meanwhile, both Bumble and Badoo, the company's other app, reported revenue drops. Both companies have been more deeply integrating AI into their businesses. In August, Bumble said it would drop its women-first messaging feature.

Ithaca, which says on its website its mission is to “use frontier technology to build products to meaningfully improve people’s lives,” was founded by Ravi Gupta and John Hegeman.

Gupta is a partner at venture-capital firm Sequoia Capital and the former chief financial officer of Instacart. Hegeman is a former executive of Meta, where he was most recently chief revenue officer.

PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Whitney Wolfe Herd

7-Eleven's North American Boss Takes Cue From Japan

New boss thinks popular concepts in Japan can be a hit with U.S. and Canadian shoppers.

BY MEGUMI FUJIKAWA

AKIO KON/BLOOMBERG NEWS

The new head of 7-Eleven Inc. has a plan to revamp the famed convenience-store chain's image in North America: mirror what has worked in Japan.

By taking lessons from 7-Eleven's model in Japan, Mauricio Leyva bets he can refuel the brand's growth in the U.S.

“It’s something that I like to say we’re stealing with pride,” he said in an interview Friday.

Leyva, who became chief executive of the convenience-store giant's North American arm in August, thinks concepts that are popular in Japan can be a hit with shoppers in the U.S. and Canada, too.

"One of the things that we like most about Japan that I've personally experienced is this attention to detail and focus on quality—that is something that we need to enhance and do better in North America," he said.

Seven & i Holdings, the Japanese operator of 7-Eleven stores, has tasked the retailsector veteran with executing an ambitious overhaul involving modernizing stores, expanding private-label brands across North America, and scaling the 7NOW delivery platform.

Reflecting on his decades of experience in the consumer industry—most recently as group president of Keurig Dr Pepper—Leyva said he is focused on understanding customers better than his competitors, and delivering experiences that keep shoppers returning to 7-Eleven for everyday needs.

One example he cited from Japan's playbook is the creation of store staples that become iconic, such as 7-Eleven Japan's egg-salad sandwich. Leyva also highlighted extensive food variety and easy-to-open product packaging.

He expressed confidence that the retail group's “North Star” transformation strategy can succeed, despite headwinds such as inflation hitting consumers’ disposable income.

In second-quarter earnings released last Thursday, Seven & i reported strong profitability in its overseas convenience-store unit, as higher gasoline prices boosted its performance in North America.

Still, Leyva expects to see a shift in U.S. consumer behavior as living costs rise.

"The transactions happening at the store level are actually keeping up in frequency but not necessarily in the amount and ticket of the basket," he said. "Value and quality will continue being as important as it's been now, but even in an accelerated way."

In Friday's interview, Seven & i also gave an update on its plan to list 7-Eleven Inc., a move aimed at unlocking shareholder value and streamlining its business structure.

The company first announced the initial public offering in March last year, but has since pushed back the timeline due to unfavorable market conditions. It now expects a listing by fiscal 2027 at the earliest.

"The objective is not to do an IPO. The objective is to increase shareholder value," said Stephen Dacus, CEO of Seven & i.

Dacus noted that the environment for retail public offerings remains challenging due to the artificial-intelligence boom.

“A lot of the oxygen has been sucked out of that by AI. That’s where all the money’s going,” he said.

Management also must deliver sustained performance improvement under the transformation plan to give investors total confidence before tapping capital markets, Dacus added.

The planned IPO is also a defensive measure against hostile buyout attempts following a long-running \$47 billion takeover campaign by Circle K owner Alimentation Couche-Tard.

The Canadian retail conglomerate ultimately withdrew its offer over friction around valuation gaps and antitrust issues in the U.S., prompting Seven & i to focus on restructuring and a standalone North American IPO strategy.

A listing could pave the way for Seven & i to secure a higher valuation, closing the stock-price gap that made it an attractive target for foreign takeovers.

Supported by:

3 brand metrics

For more details of the winning campaigns, go to www.world-media-group.com/awards

Food Maker Beyond Eyes Revamp

Share price

BY PATRICK COFFEE

Beyond Meat has spent much of its history engaged in "a truly epic marketing battle" with the meat industry, according to founder and Chief Executive Officer Ethan Brown. Now the beleaguered food maker hopes marketing can power a turnaround.

It dropped “meat” from its brand name on its packaging in 2025, introduced products and brands outside its core meat alternatives last month, and is talking with marketing agencies about a new campaign and positioning to debut next year.

The company also has begun adding a new corporate name, Beyond the Plant Protein Company, to official communications such as news releases and earnings reports.

Brown acknowledged that Beyond's brand remains in recovery mode, a condition he attributes partly to yearslong efforts by groups affiliated with meat producers to label plant-based alternatives as heavily processed and unhealthy and partly to short sellers and prediction-market traders betting on the company's decline. A 2020 regional Super Bowl ad depicted a child at a spelling bee struggling with the name of an unfamiliar ingredient that it said was used in synthetic meats, before telling viewers, "If you can't spell it or pronounce it, maybe you shouldn't be eating it."

“Beyond has been denigrated,” Brown said in an interview to discuss the company’s new strategy. “There’s so much confusion around it." The company's challenges go beyond brand perception. It has reported an operating loss each year since going public in 2019 at a nearly \$1.5 billion valuation, with shares dropping more than $98\%$ since then.

Sources: S&P Capital IQ (results); FactSet (share price)

It has recently cut spending in areas including marketing. While revenue has fallen consistently on a quarterly basis, its year-over-year sales decline improved to an 8% slip in the second quarter of this year from 20% in the final quarter of 2025.

The company also faces a market that has changed since its products first hit shelves in 2012, as consumer interest in sustainability has given way to concerns such as weight loss and protein intake, according to Emily Weiss, senior principal analyst at research firm Gartner.

But the cycle of hype and backlash that surrounded plant-based foods has almost entirely disappeared in recent years, potentially giving Beyond a chance to tap in to Americans' obsession with all things protein and find new consumers among GLP-1 users picking their foods more carefully, Weiss said.

Beyond hopes that is the case. The company's new product portfolio includes Beyond Starmatter protein powder, Beyond Starcut beef-jerky-style bars and Beyond Immerse, a line of protein-heavy carbonated beverages that recently came out of testing.

“Beyond is going to be the anchor for anything that’s plant-based, center-of-the-plate protein, but then we’re creating these other brands...and they all have a story line,” Brown said.

Patrick Coffee writes for WSJ Leadership Institute's CMO Today.

Getty Images to Restructure in Bankruptcy

BY KATHERINE HAMILTON

Getty Images is filing for bankruptcy and going private through a restructuring deal with the Koch family's company.

Koch Equity Development and members of the Getty family committed to invest \$533 million in equity in Getty to facilitate the company going private and filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

In addition, noteholders representing 83.5% of Getty's unsecured bonds have agreed to reduce outstanding debt through the retirement of \$270 million of outstanding unsecured notes.

Holders representing about 89% of Getty's secured bonds and term loans and 100% of revolving credit facility lenders have agreed to reduce interest obligations and extend debt maturities on Getty's secured debt.

The agreements are part of a restructuring deal designed to improve Getty's balance sheet and allow the company to go private. Koch Equity Development and the investing Getty family members will own $100\%$ of the reorganized Getty.

Getty will continue to operate normally through the restructuring, supported by financing from Koch, which could be as much as \$143 million.

Cybersecurity Firm Elisity Sold to IonQ

BY LAUREN THOMAS

Quantum-computing company IonQ struck an all-stock deal to buy closely held Elisity in a transaction that values the cybersecurity firm at up to \$1.3 billion, executives told The Wall Street Journal.

It is a bet that cybersecurity will be even more critical for companies as quantum computing and AI systems become more powerful and advanced, said IonQ Chairman and Chief Executive Niccolo de Masi.

"The bad guys are going to keep taking advantage of new technology," he said in an interview. "Unfortunately, we are entering the most dangerous years, vis-à-vis cybersecurity risks."

The \$1.3 billion deal price includes as much as \$150 million in contingency payments subject to Elisity's future performance.

IonQ shares on the Nasdaq closed down 9% Monday, with its market value close to \$16 billion. The stock had been on a tear since it went public via a special-purpose acquisition company in 2021.

IonQ's quantum hardware and software aims to solve problems too difficult for traditional computers across a range of industries, from drug discovery to national defense. It specializes in what's called trapped-ion quantum computers that have proved to offer greater accuracy.

The number of IonQ shares expected to be issued in the transaction will be calculated at a price between \$33.07 and \$49.61 a share, the executives said.

administration and its backing of quantum-computing technology in the U.S.

---

\$1.3B The deal will value cybersecurity firm Elisity at up to this much.

The business has gotten a boost from the growing enthusiasm of President Trump's

During the summer, the president signed executive orders pushing for building a powerful quantum computer and protecting the government against related cyber threats.

Founded in 2019, Elisity offers a platform that aims to prevent cyber attackers or ransomware from spreading across organizations. Some of its big customers include healthcare companies and hospitals.

Elisity Chief Executive James Winebrenner is expected to remain after the deal with IonQ closes.

De Masi said the two com-

panies together will aim to help customers address various growing cybersecurity risks, including threats that involve so-called AI agents.

A series of rogue AI hacks in recent months has rat-

tled the industry and government officials. In one instance, a swarm of OpenAI agents accessed U.S. government websites over several months.

Anthropic's Mythos model also has set off alarm bells on Wall Street.

De Masi said American corporations and the U.S. government must be prepared ahead of “Q-Day”—a looming point in time when quantum computers will be powerful enough to crack today’s widely used public-key cryptography.

IonQ, which works closely with the Defense Department, has been on an acquisition spree to become a one-stop shop for its customers. Earlier this year, it struck its biggest deal yet, a \$1.8 billion takeover of chip maker SkyWater Technology.

ADEK BERRY/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

The mainstay fashion division, home to Louis Vuitton and Dior, whose outlet is seen in Beijing, booked a 5% drop in sales.

LVMH Sales Dim Luxury View

---

Paris-based group recorded organic growth of just 1% from year earlier

BY JOSHUA KIRBY

French luxury giant LVMH said sales growth slowed, putting the brakes on a long-awaited recovery in Europe's struggling luxury-goods industry.

The Paris-based group, owner of a stable of fashion, jewelry and champagne brands that constitutes a bellwether for the wider sector, made sales of 18.5 billion euros, or \$20.72 billion, between July and September, it said on Monday. That marks organic growth of just 1% from the same period last year, slowing from the 3% increase the company booked over the second quarter.

The result was in line with the expectations of analysts, according to those polled by Visible Alpha ahead of the print. Still, the group's mainstay fashion division, home to heavyweight brands Louis Vuitton and Dior, booked a 5% drop in sales on year to €8.245 billion, below analysts' forecasts.

date.

The division had returned to growth in the second quarter, but the fast drop back into the red suggests LVMH—and its peers—will have to work hard to secure a sustained recovery. A slowdown in Chinese demand weighed on performance in the fashion business, LVMH said, pointing to a “less buoyant” environment in the key market.

"The third quarter brought a more challenging Chinese consumer backdrop," finance chief Cécile Cabanis said in a call on Monday. She pointed to negative newsflow that weighed on the mood among Chinese shoppers over the summer.

LVMH will likely now have to show how it can adjust pricing to make its core products more affordable to a broader public, analysts at brokerage firm Bernstein wrote following the sales up-

The deceleration in sales growth at LVMH casts a pall over the wider sector, which had hoped to put a tough patch behind it. Investors are likely to stay shy of luxury stocks until brands can show firmer acceleration in their top lines, analysts at Bank of America wrote recently.

“Luxury demand has deteriorated in the third quarter,” BofA warned.

Shares in the sector have plummeted in recent years as investors note flatlining sales with concern. Shares in Europe-based luxury firms have shed more than 20% on average this year, with LVMH among the worst performers. And analysts see little spur to demand on the horizon. A yearslong boom in Chinese demand has fizzled, and the West's aspirational middle classes, vital to brands like Louis Vuitton, are increasingly squeezed by price inflation, damping their confidence to splurge on high-end goods. The simmering war between the U.S. and Israel and Iran has only exacerbated those macroeconomic pressures.

"The reality is that the disposable income of the majority of luxury consumers is under pressure," Berenberg analysts wrote in a recent note. That leaves brands struggling to generate reliable sales growth, the analysts said.

"The fragility of demand leaves the sector vulnerable to shocks," Berenberg said. "The luxury supercycle is over."

Other companies in European luxury are due to report their own latest sales figures this month and next, including Gucci parent Kering, exclusive-handbag maker Hermès and Italian fashion house Prada next week. There were some positive signs in LVMH's sales results; the watches and jewelry division—home to Tiffany and Bulgari, as well as a host of upmarket watch brands—recorded a 6% rise in sales on year. The selective-retail business recorded an 8% increase, driven by strong growth at beauty retailer Sephora.

The Board of Directors Council Summit

November 9-10 | Palm Beach

SELECT PARTICIPANTS:

Michael Miebach

CEO, Mastercard

Brian Cornell

Chairman of the Board of Directors, Target

Joe Jimenez

Lead Director, P&G;

Director, General Motors;

Former Novartis CEO

Ellen Kullman

Director, Amgen, Carbon, Goldman Sachs;

Former Chair and CEO, DuPont

FOUNDING SPONSOR:

Stephanie Linnartz

Board Member: Home Depot; Former President, Marriott International; Former President and CEO, Under Armour

Pat Russo

Chair, Hewlett Packard Enterprise;

Lead Director, General Motors;

Director, Merck, KKR

Jing Ulrich

Member of the Board of Directors: adidas, Swarovski, Wella Company; Luxury Advisor and Brand Ambassador, Rolls-Royce Motor Cars; Former Vice Chairman, JPMorgan

Mark Weinberger

Director, Johnson & Johnson, JPMorgan Chase, MetLife, Saudi Aramco; Former Global Chairman and CEO, EY

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES

CONTRIBUTING SPONSOR:

WSJ — BOD Council

OVERVIEW:

The WSJ Board of Directors Council will convene November 9–10 in Palm Beach, Florida, as boards confront the defining leadership challenge of our time.

Artificial intelligence is reshaping industries at an unprecedented speed, creating extraordinary opportunities for innovation and growth while introducing new risks, ethical questions and governance challenges. Directors are at the center of it all, helping organizations build resilience and become more adaptable, while remaining deeply human. Through expert-led discussions and peer exchange, drawing on the global expertise of Dow Jones and The Wall Street Journal, the summit will provide directors with practical insights and forward-looking strategies to help guide their organizations through this new era of leadership.

Summit Themes:

zscaler

\- The Human Advantage

\- Leading in the Age of AI

\- Building Resilient and Adaptable Organizations

REQUEST INVITATION:

Email BoDCouncil@wsj.com or scan the QR code.

---

How to Read the Stock Tables

The following explanations apply to NYSE, NYSE Arca, NYSE American, Nasdaq Stock Market, Cboe BZX and Texas Stock Exchange listed securities. Prices are consolidated from trades reported by various market centers, including securities exchanges, Finra, electronic communications networks and other broker-dealers. The list comprises the 1,000 largest companies based on market capitalization.

Underlined quotations are those stocks with large changes in volume compared with the issue's average trading volume.

Boldfaced quotations highlight those issues whose price changed by 5% or more if their previous closing price was \$2 or higher.

1-New 52-week high; 1-New 52-week low; dd-Indicates loss in the most recent four quarters.

Stock tables reflect composite regular trading as of 4 p.m. ET and changes in the official closing prices from 4 p.m. ET the previous day.

Lows

Monday, October 12, 2026 | Stock | Sym | Close | Net Chg | A | B | C | AES | AES | 14.98 | 0.04 | Aflac | AFL | 115.89 | 1.35 | AGNC Invt | AGNC | 8.68 | 0.01 | APA | APA | 46.84 | 0.96 | ASE Tech | ASX | 47.53 | 1.10 | ASML | ASML | 1750.24 | -30.10 | AST Space | ASTS | 51.46 | 0.49 | AT&T | T | 22.49 | 0.31 | ATI | ATI | 187.98 | -3.86 | Abbott Labs | ABT | 101.82 | 2.22 | AbbVie | ABBV | 281.12 | 4.65 | Accenture | ACN | 214.87 | 5.81 | Acuity | AYI | 296.27 | -2.07 | Adobe | ADBE | 238.14 | -4.13 | AdvDrainageSys | WMS | 125.93 | 0.14 | AdvEnergyInds | AEIS | 280.77 | -7.89 | AdvMicroDevices | AMD | 594.24 | -13.86 | Aegon | AEG | 8.30 | 0.06 | AerCap | AER | 146.20 | 1.48 | AffiliatedMgrs | AMG | 381.83 | -5.43 | AffirmA | AFRM | 78.63 | -2.07 | AgilentTechs A | A | 171.33 | 0.79 | InsignEagleMines | AEM | 188.18 | -0.84 | AirProducts | APD | 283.87 | 2.61 | Airbnb | ABNB | 163.50 | -2.37 | AkamaiTech | AKAM | 101.65 | -5.30 | AlamosGold | AGI | 32.47 | -0.43 | Albemarle | ALB | 98.51 | -2.76 | Alcoa | AA | 41.67 | -0.53 | Alcon | ALC | 64.35 | 0.24 | Alibaba | BABA | 110.78 | -0.59 | AlignTech | ALGN | 140.42 | -2.29 | Allegion | ALLE | 150.04 | -0.44 | AlliantEnergy | LNT | 66.46 | 0.61 | AllisonTransm | ALSN | 111.47 | 1.61 | Allstate | ALL | 232.60 | 3.17 | AllyFinancial | ALLY | 37.91 | 0.32 | AlnylamPharm | ALNY | 227.02 | -5.66 | Alphabet C | GOOG | 348.97 | 1.11 | Alphabet A | GOGL | 352.72 | 1.06 | Altia | MO | 71.66 | -0.02 | Amazon.com | AMZN | 259.53 | -2.90 | Ambev | ABEV | 3.23 | 0.04 | Amcor | AMCR | 41.58 | -0.14 | AmerSports | AS | 28.37 | 0.23 | Ameren | AEE | 103.24 | 1.05 | AmericaMovil | AMX | 21.41 | 0.09 | AEP | AEP | 124.23 | 1.42 | AmerExpress | AXP | 311.53 | 3.36 | AmericanFin | AFG | 143.78 | 2.70 | Stock | Sym | Close | Net Chg | AmerHlthcrREIT | AHR | 52.52 | 1.72 | AmHome4Rent | AMH | 30.69 | -0.16 | AIG | AIG | 77.70 | 0.66 | AmerTowerREIT | AMT | 182.56 | 0.32 | AmerWaterWorks | AWK | 129.55 | 0.67 | Ameriprise | AMP | 500.02 | -0.49 | Ametek | AME | 249.89 | 1.31 | Amgen | AMGN | 417.57 | 2.70 | AmkorTech | AMKR | 48.11 | -1.01 | Amphenol | APH | 86.19 | -1.05 | Amrize | AMRZ | 36.09 | -0.11 | AnalogDevices | ADI | 406.25 | 0.06 | AngloGoldAsh | AU | 93.44 | -0.72 | AB InBev | BUD | 78.29 | 0.96 | AnnalyCap | NLY | 18.29 | -0.01 | AnteroMidstream | AM | 21.11 | 0.02 | AnteroResources | AR | 36.56 | 0.66 | Aon | AON | 274.78 | 1.31 | ApolloGlbMgmt | APG | 40.39 | 1.07 | Apple | AAPL | 340.97 | 4.33 | AppliedIndlTech | AIT | 333.81 | -1.57 | AppliedTech | AMAT | 497.53 | -9.50 | AppliedOptoelec | AAOI | 100.68 | -8.96 | Applin | APPI | 270.87 | -6.17 | Aptiv | APTV | 43.55 | -0.25 | Aramark | ARMK | 54.76 | -0.18 | ArcelorMittal | MT | 62.95 | -1.16 | ArchCapital | ACGL | 97.16 | 1.59 | ADM | ADM | 80.42 | 0.53 | AresMgmt | ARES | 118.15 | 0.93 | argenx | ARGX | 812.30 | -12.73 | AristaNetworks | ANET | 210.88 | -5.86 | Arm | ARM | 255.24 | -11.04 | ArrowElec | ARW | 225.72 | -2.18 | Arxis | ARXS | 47.78 | -0.11 | AscendisPharma | ASND | 227.00 | -2.23 | Assurant | AIZ | 268.63 | 2.14 | AsteraLabs | ALAB | 324.11 | -18.10 | AstraZeneca | AZN | 158.33 | -0.87 | Atlassian | TEAM | 207.75 | 0.96 | AtmosEnergy | ATO | 162.38 | 0.72 | AuroralInnov | AUR | 5.66 | -0.17 | Autodesk | ADSK | 233.54 | -1.81 | ADP | ADP | 273.81 | 2.93 | AutoZone | AZO | 2898.85 | -41.00 | Avantor | AVTR | 15.49 | -0.18 | AveryDennison | AVY | 167.65 | -0.17 | AxonEnterprise | AXON | 414.43 | -8.46 | BCE | BCE | 18.86 | 0.08 | BHP Group | BHP | 86.72 | -0.02 | BJ'sWholesale BJ | 99.80 | 1.22 | BP | BP | 46.73 | 0.48 | BWX Tech | BWXT | 139.92 | -3.91 | Stock | Sym | Close | Net Chg | Bullish | BLSH | 31.63 | -0.96 | BungeGlobal | BG | 104.22 | 1.49 | BurlingtonStrs | BURL | 268.16 | -8.81 | CACI Intl | CACI | 1614.36 | 3.71 | CBRE Group | CBRE | 130.71 | -0.09 | CDW | CDW | 143.76 | 1.59 | CF Industries CF | CF | 114.58 | 3.04 | CGI A | GIB | 70.71 | 0.62 | CH Robinson | CHRW | 139.75 | -2.56 | CME Group | CME | 277.24 | -3.32 | CMS Energy CMS | CMS | 65.86 | 0.37 | CNA Fin | CNA | 46.66 | 0.49 | CNH Indl | CNH | 11.65 | 0.26 | CRH | CRH | 81.05 | -0.49 | CSX | CSX | 47.75 | 0.49 | CVS Health | CVS | 87.74 | 1.58 | CadenceDesign | CDNS | 348.42 | -4.42 | CamdenProperty | CPT | 97.60 | 0.02 | Cameco | CCJ | 86.12 | -1.94 | CIBC | CM | 110.01 | 0.81 | CanNtriRlwy | CNI | 118.52 | 0.74 | CanadianNatRscs | CNQ | 50.50 | 0.85 | CdnPacKC | CP | 85.53 | 1.07 | CapitalOne | COF | 201.14 | 1.88 | CardinalHealth | CAH | 238.08 | 0.51 | Carlisle | CSL | 319.57 | -0.79 | Carlyle | CG | 38.25 | -0.17 | Carnival | CCL | 26.48 | 0.13 | CarpenterTech | CRS | 377.25 | -8.56 | CarrierGlobal | CARR | 55.42 | -0.14 | Carvana | CVNA | 59.51 | -4.22 | GamesGenStores | CASY | 645.72 | -0.55 | Caterpillar | CAT | 799.37 | -1.10 | BoceGlobalMkts | BCEO | 297.38 | -6.78 | Celestica | CLS | 347.50 | -14.66 | Cemex | CX | 9.57 | 0.01 | Cencora | COR | 325.06 | 1.21 | CenovusEnergy | CVE | 31.86 | 0.47 | Centene | CNC | 67.02 | 1.66 | CenterPointEner | CNP | 39.03 | 0.43 | CenbrasSystems | CBRS | 146.62 | -17.55 | CharlesRiverLabs | CRL | 301.86 | 0.07 | CharterComms | CHTR | 102.48 | -0.90 | CheckPoint | CHKP | 134.32 | -2.86 | CheniereEnergy | LNG | 282.49 | 4.31 | CheniereEnPtrs | CQP | 63.64 | 0.10 | Chevron | CVX | 215.00 | 3.02 | ChipotleFinl | CHYM | 304.45 | -1.76 | Chipotle | CMG | 30.40 | -1.19 | Chubb | CB | 345.06 | 3.86 | ChunghwaTel | CHT | 46.21 | 0.22 | Church&Dwight | CHD | 99.87 | 1.76 | Ciena | CIEN | 405.01 | -44.76 | Cigna | CI | 283.34 | 0.91 | CincinnatiFinl | CINF | 165.55 | 2.16 | Cintas | CTAS | 205.23 | 2.82 | CircelInternet | CRCL | 83.87 | -0.64 | CiscoSystems | CSCO | 115.34 | -3.05 | Citigroup | C | 131.92 | 2.28 | CitizensFinl | CFG | 63.90 | 0.33 | CleanHarbors | CLH | 319.02 | 2.09 | Clorox | CLX | 84.35 | 0.55 | Cloudflare | NET | 350.87 | -10.06 | Coca-Cola | KO | 89.79 | 1.74 | Coca-ColaCon | COKE | 197.22 | 0.98 | Coca-ColaEuropa | CEP | 105.08 | 0.83 | CoeurMining | CDE | 16.76 | -0.37 | Cognex | CGNX | 61.12 | -1.10 | CognizantTech | CTSH | 59.68 | 0.48 | Coherent | COHR | 288.02 | -24.60 | CoinbaseGilbl | COIN | 180.39 | 1.00 | ColgatePalm | CL | 89.98 | 1.71 | Comcast A | OMCA | 20.68 | 0.02 | ComfortSystems | FIX | 1638.05 | -77.64 | SABESP | SBS | 6.73 | -0.01 | Stock | Sym | Close | Net Chg | BXP | BXP | 59.55 | 0.50 | Baidu | BIDU | 84.30 | -1.03 | BakerHughes | BKR | 56.18 | -0.52 | Ball | BALL | 59.19 | 0.73 | BBVA | BBVA | 26.19 | 0.07 | BancoBradesco | BDO | 3.94 | 0.02 | BancodeChile | BCH | 38.94 | 0.05 | BancSanBrasil | BSR | 5.77 | -0.04 | BcoSantChile | BSAC | 32.19 | -0.03 | BancoSantander | SAN | 13.48 | -0.01 | BankofAmerica | BAC | 54.58 | 0.26 | BankMontreal | BMO | 163.88 | 1.29 | BankNY Mellon | BNY | 142.85 | 0.14 | BankNova Scotia | BNS | 88.80 | 0.35 | Barclays | BCS | 23.06 | -0.03 | BarrickMining | B | 40.83 | -0.23 | BaxterIntl | BAX | 24.78 | 0.43 | BectonDickens | BDX | 188.89 | 5.14 | BendingSpoons | BSP | 37.04 | -0.97 | BentleySystems | BSY | 35.15 | 0.18 | BeOneMed | ONC | 350.40 | -4.07 | Berkley | WRB | 72.90 | 0.99 | BerkHathwy B | BRKB | 517.60 | 1.98 | BerkHathwy A | BRKA | 777355060.00 | BestBuy | BBY | 86.99 | -0.02 | Bio-Techne | TECH | 72.56 | 0.10 | Bio-RadLab A | BIO | 364.42 | -1.74 | Biogen | BIIB | 229.41 | 3.70 | BioMarinPharm | BMRN | 55.39 | 0.59 | BioNTech | BNTX | 95.84 | -1.12 | BitMelnemersion | BMNR | 23.83 | -0.20 | BlackRock | BLK | 1083.92 | 1.53 | Blackstone | BX | 114.78 | 0.49 | Block | XYZ | 76.82 | -0.42 | BloomEnergy | BE | 262.28 | -18.22 | BlueOwlCapital | OWL | 9.34 | -0.15 | Boeing | BA | 189.50 | -0.87 | Booking | BKNG | 158.43 | -1.91 | BorgWarner | BWA | 60.03 | -1.27 | BostonSci | BSX | 43.84 | 1.11 | BridgeBioPharma | BBIO | 65.75 | 0.40 | BrightSpring | BTSG | 63.01 | -0.73 | BristolMyers | BMY | 57.58 | -1.54 | BritishAmTob | BTI | 55.62 | 0.12 | Broadcom | AVG | 354.73 | -6.81 | BroadridgeFinl | BR | 166.41 | 0.96 | Brookfield Asset | BAM | 45.83 | -0.05 | Brookfield | BN | 37.05 | -0.04 | BrookfieldInf | BIP | 36.72 | -0.38 | BrookWealth | BNT | 37.05 | -0.01 | Brown&Brown | BRO | 63.65 | 0.77 | BrownForman B | BF.B | 26.81 | 0.42 | BrownForman A | BF.A | 27.28 | 0.37 | Bruker | BRKR | 56.25 | -2.59 | DEF

ADVERTISEMENT

The Marketplace

To advertise: 800-366-3975 or WSJ.com/classifieds

BOATING

---

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

---

NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL PROPERTY – MANHATTAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE HOLDERS OF CD 2018-CD7, MORTGAGE TRUST COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2018-CD7, acting by and through its special servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2018. Plaintiff against PRINCE 26, LLC; 29 PRINCE STREET ASSOCIATES LLC, et al Defendant(s). Pursuant to that certain ORDER & JUDGMENT entered herein and dated August 5, 2026 ("Judgment"), I, the undersigned Referee will sell at public auction, at the front steps of 26 Prince Street, New York, New York 10012 on October 21st, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., prevailing Eastern Time, the following Premises (to be sold as a single lot), as that term is defined below, and more particularly described and bounded as follows: PARCEL A: ALL THAT CERTAIN plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Borough of Manhattan, County of New York, City and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Prince Street, distant 27 feet 11 1/4 inches (deed), 27.94 feet (actual), easterly from the corner formed by the intersection of the northerly side of Prince Street with the easterly side of Mott Street; RUNNING THENCE northerly parallel or nearly so with the easterly side of Mott Street and part of the way through party walls, 83 feet 11 inches (deed), 82.54 feet (actual); THENCE easterly 26 feet 9 and 6/10 inches (deed), 24.40 feet (actual), to a point on a line distant 86 feet and 1 inch (deed), 86.08 feet (actual), northerly from the northerly side of Prince Street which line is parallel or nearly so with the easterly side of Mott Street and intersects the northerly side of Prince Street at a point 54 feet 7 1/4 inches (deed), 55.61 feet (actual), when measured in an easterly direction from the corner formed by the intersection of the northerly side of Prince Street with the easterly side of Mott Street; THENCE southerly and along said line drawn parallel or nearly so with Mott Street and part of the way through a party wall, 86 feet 1 inch (deed), 86.08 feet (actual), to the northerly side of Prince Street; THENCE westerly along the northerly side of Prince Street, 26 feet 9 and 6/10 inches (deed) 27.67 feet (actual), to the point or place of BEGINNING. Block: 508 Lot: 52.

Said premises to be sold is known as 29 PRINCE STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10012 ("Parcel A"). PARCEL B: ALL THAT CERTAIN plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Borough of Manhattan, County of New York, City and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the Westerly side of Thompson Street, distant 169 feet 6 inches Northerly from the intersection of said Westerly side of Thompson Street and the Northerly side of Prince Street; RUNNING THENCE Westerly parallel with Prince Street, 100 feet; THENCE Northerly parallel with Thompson Street, 24 feet 8 inches; THENCE Easterly parallel with Prince Street and part of the distance through a party wall, 100 feet to the Westerly side of Thompson Street; THENCE Southerly along the Westerly side of Thompson Street, 24 feet 8 inches to the point or place of BEGINNING.. Block: 517 Lot: 31.

Said premises to be sold is known as 137 THOMPSON STREET a/k/a 135-137 THOMPSON STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10012 ("Parcel B").

PARCEL C: ALL THAT CERTAIN plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Borough of Manhattan, County of New York, City and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Prince Street, distant 47 feet 6 inches easterly from the corner formed by its intersection of the southerly side of Prince Street and the easterly side of Mott Street; RUNNING THENCE southerly and parallel with the easterly side of Mott Street a distance of 114 feet 7 inches to a point; THENCE easterly along the line forming on its northerly side an angle of 88 degrees 04 minutes 30 seconds with the last mentioned course a distance of 23 feet 1 inch to a point; THENCE northerly along a line forming on its westerly side an angle of 91 degrees 55 minutes 30 seconds with the last mentioned course a distance of 109 feet to a point on the southerly side of Prince Street which point is distant 24 feet easterly from the point or place of beginning; THENCE westerly along the southerly side of Prince Street a distance of 24 feet (record), 23 feet 7 inches (survey) to the point or place of BEGINNING. Block: 493 Lot: 15. Said premises to be sold is known as 26 PRINCE STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10012 ("Parcel C"). (With Parcel A, Parcel B, and Parcel C, collectively, being the "Premises").

Pursuant to Judgment, Premises will be sold a single lot and is not to be divided or sold separately. The approximate amount of the Judgment for Premises, collectively, is \$46,677,820.90 plus interest & costs.

Premises will be sold subject to provisions of filed Judgment and forthcoming terms of sale. Civil Action File No. 23, cv. 05586 (RAF) (QTW).

STEPHEN F. ELLMAN, ESQ., Referee

MATTHEW MANNION, from Mannion Auctions, LLC as Auctioneer

Holland & Knight, LLP

Attorney(s) for Plaintiff

787 Seventh Avenue, 31st Floor,

New York, New York 10019

---

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE PUBLIC SALE NOTICE

Please take notice that Mannon Auctions, LLC, Matthew D. Mannion, licensed auctioneer (DCA #1434494), on behalf of L&L Capital Partners LLC, a New York limited liability company ("Secured Party"), offers for sale at public auction on October 16, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) at the offices of Braunstein Turkish LLP, 7600 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 402, Woodbury, New York 11797, and simultaneously by remote auction via Zoom (Meeting link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88017043260?pwd=Z1QJhJb4MkKXkJ167ifzPyLqOKEfM;1; Meeting ID: 880 1704 3260; Meeting passcode: 254998; Call-in number: +1 646 558 8656), in connection with a Uniform Commercial Code sale of the limited liability company membership interests ("Interests") in Royal Energy Properties LLC, a New York limited liability company ("Property Owner"), which entity is the fee owner of real property located at 1666-1672 Route 9W, Milton, New York. The Interests represent one hundred percent (100%) of the ownership interest in Property Owner and is owned by Royal Energy Properties Delaware LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

The Interests are being offered as a single lot, "AS-IS, WHERE-IS", with no express or implied warranties, representations, statements or conditions of any kind made by the Secured Party or any person acting for or on behalf of the Secured Party, without any recourse whatsoever to the Secured Party or any other person acting for or on behalf of the Secured Party. The winning bidder shall be responsible for the payment of all transfer taxes, stamp duties and similar taxes incurred in connection with the purchase of the Interests.

All interested parties shall be required to provide a minimum deposit of \$100,000 with Secured Party's counsel at least 5 days prior to the auction, and all bids (other than credit bids of the Secured Party) must be in U.S. Dollars, and the successful bidder must be prepared to deliver immediately available good funds by wire or bank check to the Secured Party, within twenty-four (24) hours after the sale and otherwise comply with the bidding requirements.

Interested parties who would like additional information concerning the sale of the Interests should contact the Secured Party's counsel, Braunstein Turkish LLP, 7600 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 402, Woodbury, New York 11797, Attn: Vincent L. Georgetti, Esq., Tel: (516) 802-0700 x312, E-mail: vg@braunsteinturkish.com. | Stock | Sym | Close | Net Chg | COPEL | ELPC | 14.18 | -0.01 | ConocoPhillips | COP | 137.56 | 3.46 | ConEd | ED | 107.20 | 1.10 | ConstBrands A STZ | 126.40 | 3.76 | ConstellationEner | CEG | 293.89 | -4.18 | Cooper | COO | 55.55 | 1.18 | Copart | CPRT | 26.48 | -0.84 | ConceptTherap | CORT | 121.19 | ... | CorebridgeFin | CRBG | 34.58 | 0.49 | CoreWeave | CRWV | 80.26 | -1.82 | Corning | GLW | 147.28 | -9.40 | Corpay | CPAY | 397.67 | -0.25 | CoStar | CSGP | 22.21 | -0.46 | Costco | COST | 959.44 | 12.52 | Companp | CPNG | 15.28 | -0.54 | Crane | CR | 204.54 | -0.21 | Credicorp | BAP | 381.87 | 0.66 | CredoTech | CRDO | 200.84 | -15.71 | CrowdStrike | CRWD | 263.01 | -12.03 | CrownCastle | CCI | 81.01 | 1.37 | Crown Holdings | CCK | 108.51 | 0.25 | Cullen/Frost | CFR | 151.77 | 1.53 | Cummins | CMI | 527.86 | 4.47 | Gurtiss-Wright | CW | 504.16 | -8.44 | DTE Energy | DTE | 128.05 | 1.15 | DT Midstream | DTM | 125.62 | 1.61 | Danaher | DHR | 221.20 | 1.39 | Darden | DRI | 199.61 | 1.95 | Darlinglnegred | DAR | 61.06 | 0.80 | Datadog | DOG | 287.29 | -5.97 | DaVita | DVA | 181.78 | 2.53 | DeckersOutdoor | DECK | 84.27 | 1.08 | Deluxe | DLX | 67.01 | 11.00 | DellTechC | DELL | 576.76 | -9.30 | Deuterra | DAL | 80.12 | -2.06 | DeutscheBank | DB | 33.65 | -0.03 | DevonEnergy | DVN | 48.96 | 0.70 | DexCom | DXCM | 85.92 | 1.81 | Diageo | DEO | 88.73 | 2.00 | DiamondbEner | FANG | 195.11 | 2.98 | Dick's | DKS | 137.37 | 0.72 | DigitalReality | DLR | 180.16 | 1.40 | DigitalOcean | DOCN | 131.41 | -3.41 | Dillard's | DDS | 642.29 | 0.05 | Disney | DIS | 108.49 | 0.44 | DocuSign | DOCU | 70.97 | -0.11 | DollarGeneral | DG | 126.54 | -0.69 | DollarTree | DLTR | 117.61 | -1.03 | DominionEner | D | 62.45 | 0.81 | Domino's | DPZ | 310.90 | 1.54 | Donaldson | DCI | 86.47 | -0.46 | DoorDash | DASH | 114.24 | -2.26 | Dover | DOV | 190.88 | 2.05 | Dow | DOW | 28.12 | -0.30 | DrReddy'sLab | RDY | 12.82 | 0.34 | DraftKings | DKNG | 19.66 | 0.08 | DukeEnergy | DUK | 117.69 | 1.04 | DuPont | DD | 129.37 | -0.63 | Dynatrace | DT | 65.25 | 1.75 | EMCOR | EME | 779.16 | -10.29 | ENI | E | 56.77 | 0.77 | EOG Rscs | EOG | 150.51 | 2.35 | EQT | EQT | 53.22 | 0.39 | EastWestBncp | EWBC | 125.56 | 0.03 | EastGroup | EGP | 197.45 | 1.47 | Eaton | ETN | 426.69 | -2.96 | eBay | EBAY | 114.65 | 2.46 | EchoStar | ECHO | 95.10 | 0.26 | Ecolab | ECL | 284.30 | 2.47 | Ecopetrol | EC | 17.23 | 0.29 | EdisonIntl | EIX | 55.64 | 0.34 | EdwardsLife | EW | 86.39 | 1.18 | ---

BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES

---

ESTABLISHED JEWELRY EXCHANGE

---

\$13M 2025 Revenue Totally Turnkey

---

High-end jewelry retail and loan operation

\- Multiple revenue streams: fully documented financials.

  • High barriers to entry with limited local competition.

\- Primed for expansion.

---

More info:

Yuval 347-537-8205 or Yuvalelkeslasi@yahoo.com

---

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

---

THE MARKETPLACE

---

ADVERTISE TODAY

---

(800) 366-3975

For more information visit: wsj.com/classifieds

© 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

All Rights Reserved. | Stock | Sym | Close | Net Chg | ElancoAnimal | ELAN | 22.56 | -0.36 | Elastic | ESTC | 95.52 | -2.71 | ElibSystems | ESLT | 653.84 | -1.90 | EldoradoGold | EGO | 37.54 | -0.12 | ElevanceHealth | ELV | 422.09 | 9.39 | Embraer | EMBI | 71.98 | 0.82 | Emera | EMA | 45.84 | 0.18 | EmersonElec | EMR | 162.46 | 0.63 | Enbridge | ENB | 46.95 | 0.35 | EncompassHealth | ENHC | 124.42 | 1.09 | EnergyTransfer | ET | 20.41 | ... | EnlightRenewables | ENLT | 68.70 | 1.29 | EnsignGroup | ENG5 | 173.92 | 2.12 | Entegris | ENTG | 160.01 | -5.78 | Entergy | ETR | 103.99 | 1.19 | EnterpriseProd | EPD | 35.91 | -0.17 | Equifax | EFX | 147.33 | 1.55 | Equinix | EQIX | 102.60 | 6.54 | Equinox | EQNR | 43.94 | 0.93 | EquinoxGold | EQX | 11.20 | -0.22 | Equitable | EQH | 53.52 | 0.60 | EquityLife | ELS | 59.19 | 0.18 | Erlndemnityl | ERX | 225.06 | 3.02 | EssentialUtil | WTRG | 35.19 | -0.17 | EssexProp | ESS | 270.39 | -1.16 | EsterLaudar | EL | 100.04 | 1.99 | EvercoreA | EVR | 272.22 | 0.36 | Everest | EG | 372.53 | 4.16 | Evergy | EVRG | 81.50 | 0.54 | Everpure | P | 155.31 | 0.82 | EversourceEner | ES | 66.10 | 0.37 | Exelixis | EXEL | 59.82 | -0.04 | Exelon | EXC | 42.12 | 0.36 | ExpandEnergy | EXE | 88.81 | 0.59 | Expedia | EXPE | 268.47 | -5.75 | ExpeditorsIntl | EXPD | 193.41 | 0.17 | ExtraSpaceSt | EXR | 134.05 | -0.60 | ExxonMobil | XOM | 172.15 | 3.21 | F5 | FFIV | 473.49 | -6.34 | FTAI Aviation | FTAI | 165.53 | -4.43 | Fabrinet | FN | 456.40 | -29.88 | FactSet | FDS | 288.67 | 1.49 | FairIsaac | FICO | 740.00 | 72.42 | Fastenal | FAST | 51.49 | 0.74 | FederalRealty | FRT | 106.42 | 0.26 | FedEx | FDX | 292.23 | 0.52 | FedExFreight | FDXF | 113.12 | -2.35 | FergusonEnts | FERG | 220.55 | 0.51 | Ferrari | RACE | 389.24 | -0.67 | Ferrovial | FER | 50.34 | 0.19 | FidNatIfinl | FNF | 39.05 | 0.25 | FidNatInfo | FIS | 34.26 | 0.22 | FifthThirdBncp | FITB | 50.82 | 0.18 | Figma | FIG | 21.96 | -0.54 | FirstCitBrcshA | FNCA | 2082.50 | 14.11 | FirstHorizon | FHN | 23.06 | -0.02 | FirstSolar | FSLR | 179.72 | 1.90 | FirstCash | FCFS | 216.20 | 2.50 | FirstEnergy | FE | 45.36 | 0.36 | Fiserv | FISV | 46.05 | 0.42 | FiveBelow | FIVE | 213.58 | -1.15 | Flex | FLEX | 117.24 | -2.59 | Flowserve | FLS | 70.65 | -1.63 | FlutterEnt | FLUT | 78.28 | -1.50 | FEMSA | FMX | 121.65 | 2.41 | FordMotor | F | 12.00 | -0.17 | ForgentPwrw | FPS | 37.09 | -2.94 | FormFactor | FORM | 130.28 | -9.39 | Fortinet | FTNT | 192.94 | -1.81 | Fortis | FTS | 53.74 | 0.43 | Fortive | FTV | 57.37 | 0.11 | FoxB | FOX | 55.98 | 0.09 | FoxA | FOXA | 62.59 | 0.18 | Franco-Nevada | FNV | 245.75 | 0.90 | FranklinTemp | BEN | 31.81 | -0.19 | FreedomHolding | FRHC | 168.01 | -1.64 | FreeportMcF | FCX | 73.29 | -0.40 | FreseniusMedCare | FMS | 21.21 | 0.15 | Frontline | FRO | 59.19 | 3.09 | Futu | FUTU | 112.26 | -1.45 | Stock | Sym | Close | Net Chg | HormelFoods | HRL | 19.30 | 0.11 | DR Horton | DHI | 134.29 | -0.59 | HostHotels | HST | 27.24 | 0.09 | HoulihanLokey | HLI | 130.38 | 0.22 | HowmetAerospace | HWM | 220.81 | -4.45 | Hubbell | HUBB | 274.00 | -0.86 | HubSpot | HUBS | 223.37 | -4.93 | HudbayMinerals | HBM | 25.76 | -0.36 | Humana | HUM | 433.50 | 1.63 | JBHunt | JBHT | 228.31 | -0.95 | HuntingtonBcshs | HBAN | 15.40 | 0.08 | HuntingIngalls | HII | 264.03 | -0.77 | Hut8 | HUT | 85.24 | 0.97 | HyattHotels | H | 161.18 | -0.76 | ICICI Bank | IBN | 28.05 | 0.16 | IDEX | IEX | 235.77 | 1.48 | IdexxLab | IDXX | 523.94 | 5.94 | IES Holdings | IESC | 287.79 | -9.73 | ING Groep | ING | 33.39 | 0.02 | INNIO | INIO | 18.61 | -1.18 | Invesco | IVZ | 29.26 | -0.25 | IQVIA | IQV | 262.21 | 2.33 | IREN | IREN | 34.80 | -0.39 | ITT | ITT | 201.90 | 0.53 | IamGold | IAG | 18.57 | -0.23 | IcahnEnterprises | IEP | 6.61 | 0.05 | Icon | ICLR | 164.40 | 0.23 | IllinoisToolWks | ITW | 265.11 | 0.98 | Illumina | ILMN | 276.67 | -1.50 | ImmunityBio | IBRX | 10.12 | -0.39 | ImperialOil | IMO | 124.40 | 1.39 | Incyte | INCY | 111.36 | -1.43 | Infosys | INFY | 18.00 | 0.10 | IngersollRand | IR | 79.09 | 0.35 | Insmed | INSM | 98.56 | -2.04 | Insulet | PODD | 139.81 | 4.53 | Intel | INTC | 101.35 | -3.35 | InteractiveBrkrs | IBKR | 87.89 | 0.02 | ICE | ICE | 157.42 | 1.23 | InterContHtls | IHG | 159.85 | -0.83 | IBM | IBM | 227.02 | -0.11 | IntlFlavors | IFF | 84.96 | 0.41 | IntlPaper | IP | 31.74 | -0.38 | Intuit | INTU | 305.99 | 3.24 | IntuitiveSurgical | ISRG | 427.64 | 3.68 | InvitatHomes | INVH | 26.70 | -0.09 | IonQ | IONQ | 36.27 | -3.62 | IronMountain | IRM | 115.10 | 0.59 | ItauUnibanco | ITUB | 10.06 | -0.10 | JKL

GHI | JBS | JBS | 12.86 | -0.12 | JD.com | JD | 26.72 | -0.37 | JPMorganChase | JPM | 334.30 | 1.31 | Jabil | JBL | 31.012 | 5.73 | JackHenry | JKHY | 149.63 | 0.32 | JacobsSolns | J | 139.43 | 0.28 | JamesHardie | JHX | 24.76 | -0.36 | JazzPharm | JAZZ | 216.75 | -1.67 | JefferiesFinl | JEF | 45.01 | 0.63 | JFrog | FROG | 99.02 | -3.21 | J&J | JNJ | 263.73 | 2.29 | JohnsonControls | JCI | 155.41 | -2.03 | JonesLang | JLL | 298.10 | -1.77 | KB Financial | KB | 121.98 | -1.09 | KE Holdings | BEKE | 17.68 | -0.16 | KKR | KKR | 91.51 | 0.56 | KLA | KLAC | 190.12 | -5.45 | KT | KT | 18.20 | -0.10 | Kaspi.kz | KSPI | 97.17 | 4.18 | Kenvue | KVUE | 17.83 | 0.13 | KeurigDrPepper | KDP | 32.75 | 0.99 | KeyCorp | KEY | 20.09 | 0.12 | KeysightTech | KEYS | 377.70 | -5.05 | KimveryClark KMB | 98.77 | 11.18 | KimcoRealty | KIM | 22.32 | 0.16 | KinderMorgan | KMI | 33.08 | 0.59 | KinrossGold | KGC | 23.55 | -0.19 | Knight-Swift | KNX | 64.52 | 0.05 | Philips | PHG | 24.74 | 0.50 | KoreaElecPwr | KEP | 10.60 | -0.43 | KraftHeinz | KHC | 22.45 | 0.18 | Kroger | KR | 62.56 | 0.92 | KrystalBiotech | KRYS | 332.07 | 0.46 | KymeraTherap | KYMR | 112.08 | -0.32 | Latam Airlines | LTM | 50.00 | -0.25 | LPL Financial | LPLA | 330.12 | -0.76 | L3HarrisTech | LHX | 238.25 | 1.28 | Labcorp | LB | 315.52 | 3.37 | LamResearch | LRCX | 308.70 | -9.28 | LamarAdv | LAMR | 146.87 | 0.49 | Las Vegas Sands | LVS | 36.15 | -0.02 | LatticeSemi | LSCC | 122.84 | -3.21 | Leidos | LDOS | 121.60 | -0.08 | Lennar A | LEN | 74.65 | -2.04 | Lennar B | LENB | 74.08 | -1.94 | LennoxIntl | LII | 356.72 | 0.28 | LeonardoDRS | DRS | 35.62 | -0.62 | LiAuto | LI | 11.40 | -0.14 | LibertyLiveA | LLVYA | 94.17 | -1.16 | LibertyLiveC | LLYVK | 96.93 | -1.27 | LibertyMediaF | FWONK | 93.81 | -0.23 | LibertyMediaA | FWONA | 86.39 | -0.28 | LifeTime | LTH | 40.37 | -0.25 | Eli Lilly | LLY | 1182.62 | 3.35 | LincolnElectric | LECO | 259.69 | -1.44 | Linde | LIN | 487.35 | 3.62 | Littelfuse | LFUS | 413.84 | -12.66 | LiveNationEnt | LYV | 169.64 | -0.69 | LloydsBanking | LYG | 5.46 | 0.05 | LockheedMartin | LMT | 511.88 | 2.29 | Loews | L | 107.78 | 1.09 | LogitechIntl | LOGI | 98.33 | 0.06 | Lowe's | LOW | 185.57 | -0.43 | lululemon | LULU | 94.66 | 0.16 | Lumentum | LITE | 955.41 | -107.95 | LyondellBasell | LYB | 59.41 | -0.62 | GE Aerospace GE | 308.64 | 0.44 | GE HealthCare GEHC | 67.74 | 2.00 | GE Vernova GEV | 996.80 | -7.93 | GFLEnvironmental GFL | 42.38 | -0.40 | GSK | 6K | 46.92 | Gallagher AJ | 233.92 | 1.22 | GameStop GME | 27.23 | 0.67 | Gaming&Leisure GLPI | 38.48 | 0.20 | Garmin GRMN | 266.76 | -1.60 | Gartner IT | 194.10 | 2.95 | GenDigital GEN | 23.35 | 0.10 | Generac GNRC | 218.37 | -6.57 | GeneralDynamics GD | 335.46 | 4.19 | GeneralMills GIS | 32.70 | 0.41 | GeneralMotors GM | 82.37 | -0.36 | Genmab GMAB | 37.37 | 0.30 | GenuineParts GPC | 129.62 | 2.60 | Gerdau GGB | 5.14 | 0.02 | GileadSciences GILD | 150.43 | -0.74 | GitLab GTLB | 56.10 | 0.92 | Glaukos GKOS | 168.02 | 2.33 | GlobalPayments GPN | 82.06 | -0.14 | GlobalFoundries GFS | 48.34 | -0.10 | Globalstar GSAT | 100.04 | -0.76 | GlobeLife GI | 165.12 | 0.95 | GlobusMedical GMD | 76.24 | 1.59 | GoDaddy GDDY | 102.32 | -2.03 | GoldFields GFI | 36.76 | -0.06 | GoldmanSachs GS | 893.95 | -1.37 | Grab GRAB | 3.15 | -0.04 | Graco GGG | 78.81 | 0.60 | Grainger GWW | 1306.73 | 16.94 | GAP PAC | 202.79 | 1.29 | GrupoCibest CIB | 94.96 | 0.15 | GuardantHealth GH | 162.79 | -4.68 | Guidewire GWRE | 164.74 | -2.58 | HCA Healthcare HCA | 458.60 | 7.51 | HDFC Bank HDB | 22.58 | 0.30 | HF Sinclair DINO | 122.91 | 1.61 | HP HPQ | 29.87 | -0.33 | HSBC HSBC | 94.32 | 1.34 | H World HTHT | 44.55 | 0.39 | Haleon HLN | 9.50 | 0.18 | Halliburton HAL | 32.60 | 0.05 | HalozymeTherap HALO | 111.08 | 0.66 | HarmonyGold HMY | 16.68 | -0.20 | HartfordIns HIG | 130.19 | 1.08 | Hasbro HAS | 94.73 | 1.41 | HealthpeakProp DOC | 18.95 | 0.15 | HeclaMining HL | 16.84 | -0.23 | Heico HEI | 297.09 | -1.19 | HeicoA HELA | 222.87 | -0.18 | HenrySchein HSIC | 84.23 | 0.22 | Hershey HSY | 163.84 | 1.10 | HewlettPackard HPE | 70.33 | -3.13 | Hilton HLT | 327.54 | 0.98 | HomeDepot HD | 290.62 | -0.12 | HondaMotor HMC | 32.66 | -0.04 | Honeywell Aero HONA | 157.27 | -0.67 | Honeywell HON | 209.64 | 1.91 | Stock | Sym | Close | Net Chg | MatchGroup | MTCH | 41.52 | 0.43 | McCormickVtg | MKCV | 46.77 | 0.04 | McCormick | MKC | 45.58 | 0.77 | McDonald's | MCD | 235.65 | 0.42 | McKesson | MCK | 955.76 | 16.92 | Medline | MDL | 35.76 | -0.50 | Medpace | MEDP | 620.05 | 8.00 | Medtronic | MDT | 91.73 | 3.45 | MercadoLibre | MELI | 1892.44 | 2.59 | Merck | MRK | 145.45 | -0.15 | MetaPlatforms | META | 742.96 | 24.29 | MetLife | MET | 100.17 | 1.84 | Mettler-Toledo | MTD | 1563.01 | 13.02 | MicrochipTech | MCHP | 73.83 | -1.72 | MicronTech | MU | 989.04 | -39.96 | Microsoft | MSFT | 541.15 | 6.08 | MidAmApt | MAA | 116.53 | -0.33 | MillicomIntl | TIGO | 80.28 | 0.80 | MitsubishiUFJ | MUFG | 22.35 | -0.03 | MizuhoFin | MFG | 10.59 | -0.02 | Moderna | MRNA | 2137.4 | -11.26 | ModineMfg | MOD | 172.50 | -9.06 | MolinaHealthcare | MOH | 204.36 | 7.43 | Mondelez | MDLZ | 61.78 | 1.39 | MongoDB | MDB | 381.29 | -4.64 | MonolithicPower | MPWR | 1193.23 | -67.06 | MonsterBev | MNST | 43.76 | 0.12 | Moody's | MCO | 470.50 | 6.27 | Moog A | MOGA | 371.76 | 8.67 | MorganStanley | MA | 190.02 | -2.2 | MotorolaSol | MSI | 466.33 | 2.15 | MuellerInds | MLI | 60.87 | 0.16 | MurphyUSA | MUSA | 525.47 | -3.67 | NVIDIA Energy | NRG | 106.37 | -1.60 | NVR | NVR | 5749.96 | -149.20 | NXP Semicon | NXPI | 225.21 | -2.31 | Nasdaq | NDAQ | 94.29 | 0.64 | Natera | NTRA | 397.77 | -2.94 | NationalGrid | NGG | 77.12 | 0.64 | NatWest | NWG | 17.24 | 0.11 | Nebius | NBIS | 210.06 | -11.01 | NetApp | NTAP | 239.18 | 2.03 | NetEase | NTES | 125.41 | 1.17 | Netflix | NFLX | 70.61 | 0.31 | Neurocrine | NBIX | 141.37 | -1.07 | NYTimes A | NYT | 66.08 | -0.24 | Newmont | NEM | 117.15 | -0.69 | NewsCorp A | NWSA | 29.38 | 0.26 | NewsCorp B | NWS | 32.38 | 0.37 | NextEraEnergy | NEE | 78.51 | 1.13 | Nextpower | NXT | 84.86 | -1.25 | Nike | NKE | 35.35 | 0.64 | NiSource | NI | 41.23 | 0.47 | Nokia | NOK | 9.90 | -0.46 | Nomura | NMR | 9.57 | -0.02 | Nordson | NDSN | 330.44 | 2.27 | NorfolkSouthern | NSC | 319.36 | 1.57 | NorthernTrust | NTRS | 169.21 | 1.00 | NorthropGrum | NOC | 485.00 | 4.28 | Nova | NVMI | 340.40 | -12.60 | Novartis | NVS | 143.84 | 0.09 | NovoNordisk | NVO | 38.58 | -0.06 | NuHoldings | NU | 16.01 | -0.11 | Nucor | NUE | 251.83 | 1.50 | Nutanix | NTNX | 74.14 | -0.49 | Nutrien | NTR | 68.00 | 0.52 | nVentElectric | NVT | 162.78 | -4.65 | NVIDIA | NVDA | 226.32 | -2.96 | M N | Macom Tech | MTSI | 306.34 | -23.70 | M&T Bank | MTB | 219.89 | 2.40 | MKS | MKSI | 249.91 | -14.59 | MPLX | MPLX | 56.83 | 0.53 | MSCI | MSCI | 568.01 | 2.89 | MadisonAirSins | MAIR | 23.29 | -0.93 | MSG Sports | MSGS | 403.34 | 1.04 | MadrigalPharm | MDGL | 467.16 | -4.59 | Magnalntl | MGA | 63.56 | -0.43 | Magnulncr | MMC | 17.83 | 0.55 | HannifastAssoc | MANH | 217.89 | 13.00 | ManulifeFinl | MFC | 42.86 | 0.43 | Maplebear | CART | 47.83 | 0.07 | MarathonPetrol | MPC | 458.31 | 3.78 | Markel | MKL | 1790.32 | 29.58 | Marriott | MAR | 369.30 | 3.42 | Marsh | MRSH | 176.54 | 0.78 | MartinMarietta | MLM | 477.18 | -1.17 | MarvellTech | MRVL | 265.86 | -9.42 | Masco | MAS | 68.98 | 0.23 | MasTec | MTZ | 206.85 | -5.80 | Mastercard | MA | 595.09 | 5.95 | O P Q | OGE Energy | OGE | 46.80 | 0.30 | ONEOK | OKE | 92.02 | 2.22 | ON Semi | ON | 76.00 | -1.53 | O'ReillyAuto | ORLY | 86.65 | 0.20 | OccidentalPetrol | OXY | 61.13 | 1.02 | Okta | OKTA | 227.08 | -5.05 | OldDomFreight | ODFL | 181.91 | -0.06 | OldNatIBncp | ONB | 24.80 | 0.22 | OldRepublic | ORI | 38.07 | -0.10 | OmegaHealthcare | OHI | 45.17 | 0.76 | Omnicom | OMC | 77.07 | 0.59 | OnHolding | ONON | 35.35 | 0.26 | OntInnovation | ONTO | 273.74 | -20.79 | Oracle | ORCL | 137.39 | -4.01 | Orix | IX | 36.85 | -0.10 | OscarHealth | OSCR | 34.01 | 0.64 | OtisWorldwide | OTIS | 66.75 | 0.80 | Ovintiv | OVV | 65.12 | 1.24 | OwensCorning | OC | 112.61 | -1.55 | PBF Energy | PBF | 85.02 | 0.75 | PDD | PDD | 80.92 | -0.43 | PG&E | PCG | 13.16 | 0.03 | PNC Finl | PNC | 221.26 | 2.05 | POSCO | PKX | 55.64 | -1.84 | PPG Ind | PPG | 103.71 | -0.25 | PPL | PPL | 34.34 | 0.09 | PTC | PTC | 194.39 | -0.06 | Paccar | PCAR | 108.13 | 0.09 | PackagingCpAm | PKG | 227.82 | -2.69 | PalantirTech | PLTR | 209.00 | -0.05 | PaloAltoNtwks | PANW | 403.83 | -14.95 | PanAmerSilver | PAAS | 45.71 | -0.56 | ParkerHannifin | PHH | 956.89 | -5.67 | Paychex | PAYX | 104.64 | 0.66 | PaycomSoftware | PAYC | 235.01 | 2.79 | PayPal | PYPL | 16.05 | -0.10 | PayPay | PAYP | 15.58 | -0.13 | Pearson | PSO | 17.22 | 0.25 | PembinaPipeline | PBA | 47.80 | 0.49 | PembrokeAuto | PAG | 194.67 | -1.49 | Penumbra | PEN | 320.96 | 1.56 | PepsiCo | PEP | 126.68 | 0.71 | PerformanceFood | PFGC | 94.72 | -0.16 | PermianRscs | PR | 23.40 | 0.37 | PershingSquare | PS | 54.22 | -0.37 | PetroleoBrasil | PBR | 25.42 | 0.12 | PetroleoBrasilA | PBRA | 22.62 | 0.15 | Pfizer | PFE | 28.40 | 0.12 | PhilipMorris | PM | 202.00 | 0.81 | Phillips66 | PSX | 281.47 | 3.29 | PinnacleFinPtrs | PNFP | 94.51 | 0.52 | PinnacleWest | PNW | 99.91 | 0.99 | Pinterest | PINS | 21.42 | 0.02 | PlainsAllAmPipe | PAA | 24.50 | 0.16 | PlainsGP | PAGP | 26.76 | 0.13 | Popular | BPOP | 156.45 | 0.16 | PrincipalFinl | PFG | 107.84 | 0.60 | Procter&Gamble | PG | 153.20 | 1.97 | Progressive | PGR | 220.28 | 2.85 | Prologis | PLD | 132.47 | 2.98 | ProtagonistTherap | PTGX | 144.88 | 1.15 | PrudentialFinl | PRU | 113.39 | 0.30 | Prudential | PUK | 23.87 | -0.05 | PSEG | PEG | 70.76 | -1.52 | PublicStorage | PSA | 288.88 | -0.98 | PulteGroup | PHM | 111.14 | -0.98 | QXO | QXO | 10.64 | -0.17 | Qiagen | QGEN | 45.31 | -0.07 | QnityElec | Q | 123.21 | -3.39 | Qualcomm | QCOM | 174.43 | -1.07 | QuantaServices | PWR | 694.79 | -11.15 | Quantinuum | QNT | 39.52 | -1.78 | ---

New Highs and Lows

The following explanations apply to the New York Stock Exchange, NYSE Arca, NYSE American and Nasdaq Stock Market stocks that hit a new 52-week intraday high or low in the latest session. % CHG-Daily percentage change from the previous trading session.

Monday, October 12, 2026 | Stock | Sym | 52-Wk Hi/Lo | % Chg | Highs | ACCO Brands | ACO | 4.56 | 1.1 | AbbVie | ABBV | 281.30 | 1.7 | AffiliatedMgrs | AFG | 395.00 | -0.8 | AlgonquinNT2079 | AQNMB | 25.98 | 0.1 | AmerFinDeb2060 | AFGD | 22.92 | 0.4 | AmerIntegrityIns | AII | 27.86 | 1.3 | Amplitude | AMPL | 16.18 | -0.9 | ApertureAC | APUR | 10.05 | 0.1 | Arcosa | ACA | 147.40 | 0.1 | ArdmoreShipping | ASC | 20.12 | 2.8 | Atlassian | TEAM | 212.84 | 0.5 | AvitaMedical | AVD | 19.37 | 1.2 | BaxterFoods | TBBD | 56.37 | 1.3 | BW LPG | BWLP | 26.71 | 0.9 | BancoBradesco | BBDO | 4.16 | 0.5 | Biogen | BIIB | 238.24 | 1.6 | BlackHawkAcqn | BKHA | 23.00 | 12.7 | BlueportAcqnA | BPAC | 10.24 | ... | Box | BOX | 37.30 | 0.9 | C&F Fin | CFFI | 104.39 | 1.9 | CMBTECH | CMBT | 21.19 | 1.6 | CalamosCap | CAPN | 11.97 | 2.5 | ChainBridgeBncp | CBNA | 54.11 | 1.4 | CEMIG Pref | CIG.C | 4.04 | -4.7 | CompX Intl | CIX | 40.30 | -0.5 | Concentra | CON | 37.76 | 0.9 | DHT | DHT | 26.47 | 6.4 | Danaos | DAC | 172.76 | 0.2 | Datadog | DDOG | 300.68 | -2.0 | DiFiDevPfdC | CHAD | 11.82 | -1.8 | Dynatrace | DNMX | 10.10 | 0.1 | Dynatrace | DT | 65.29 | 2.8 | EmmisAcqn | EMIS | 10.28 | ... | Exelixis | EXEL | 61.66 | -0.1 | F5 | FFIV | 483.30 | -1.3 | Figs | FIGS | 17.98 | 12.4 | ForafriGlobalWt | AFRIW | 2.23 | -1.7 | ForafriGlobal | AFRI | 13.48 | 0.3 | Fortinet | FTNT | 196.89 | -0.9 | Frontline | FRO | 59.55 | 5.5 | FutureVisionl | FVNNU | 49.00 | 6.9 | GameStop | GME | 27.25 | 2.5 | GenieEnergy | GNE | 16.95 | 1.4 | GigaCloudTech | GCT | 58.17 | 0.8 | GitLab | GTLB | 56.64 | 1.7 | HF Sinclair | DINO | 124.50 | 1.3 | Haemonetics | HAE | 122.24 | 2.8 | Hafnia | HAFN | 11.97 | 1.9 | Highty | HGTY | 14.56 | 2.5 | HallChadwickA | HCAC | 10.17 | 0.2 | HealthStream | HSTM | 33.63 | 1.0 | HighPeakEner | HPK | 9.81 | 1.7 | HingeHealth | HNGE | 104.93 | 1.9 | Hongli | HLP | 2.67 | 3.9 | IBEX | IBEX | 45.30 | 0.5 | IDT | IDT | 82.80 | -0.1 | INGapoAcqn | INAC | 10.43 | -0.1 | IntlSeaways | INSW | 125.40 | 3.7 | Joyy | JOYY | 82.26 | 1.4 | KaratPkg | KRT | 56.06 | -0.2 | LindbladExped | LIND | 36.78 | 1.1 | Moderna | MRNA | 227.46 | -5.0 | NaviosMaritime | NMM | 96.45 | 3.4 | NetApp | NTAP | 239.80 | 0.9 | Netcapital | NCPL | 2.66 | 35.1 | NetEaseTech | NTWK | 6.49 | 3.9 | NordAcmTankers | NAT | 8.84 | 3.8 | Nutanix | NTNX | 75.98 | -0.7 | OkariisEcoTankers | ECO | 99.13 | 5.9 | Okta | OKTA | 235.00 | -2.2 | OportunFin | OPRT | 9.24 | 2.7 | PCConnection | CNKN | 94.87 | 1.9 | PagerDuty | PD | 16.57 | 0.5 | Stock | Sym | 52-Wk Hi/Lo | % Chg | PalantirTech | PLTR | 212.94 | ... | PatriotAcqn | PTACU | 10.32 | 0.4 | Paysign | PAYS | 15.58 | -1.3 | PetroleoBrasil | PBR | 25.80 | 0.5 | PetroleoBrasilia | PBRLA | 22.93 | 0.7 | PlutonianAcqnII | PLUN | 10.05 | -1.5 | PumaBiotech | PBYY | 10.50 | ... | Quanta | QLTY | 206.25 | -1.8 | QuasarEdgeAcqn | QRED | 10.07 | 0.2 | RangeCapitalAcqnII | RNGT | 10.20 | 0.1 | ReinsGrp | RGA | 261.58 | 1.6 | RenaissanceRe | RNR | 341.57 | 2.3 | RetensionPharm | RTSN | 11.79 | 7.5 | RibbonAcqnI | RIBBU | 23.95 | -4.1 | RileyExpln | REPX | 46.54 | 2.0 | Raytheon | RPX | 57.78 | 0.5 | RiverCityBank | RCBC | 56.71 | 1.7 | RomanDBDR II | DRBD | 10.75 | 0.3 | RushEnt B | RUSHB | 57.73 | -0.9 | Sasol | SSL | 15.41 | 1.3 | Shell | SHEL | 102.47 | 1.4 | ShreyaAcqn | SAGU | 10.00 | 0.7 | SizzleAcqnII | SZZL | 10.50 | ... | SturmWt | SWTW | 101.19 | -1.1 | StarrySeaAcqn | SSEAU | 12.04 | 1.6 | StarrySeaAcqn | SSEA | 10.93 | 5.3 | StoneBridgeAcqnII | APAC | 10.28 | ... | SuncorEnergy | SU | 74.25 | 1.8 | Teekay | TK | 15.90 | 1.9 | TeekayTankers | TNK | 110.65 | 2.2 | ThayerVenturesII | TYAI | 10.42 | 0.1 | Truvern Trent | TRND | 51.75 | 2.5 | TsakotoEnergy | TEN | 54.64 | 6.2 | VEON | VEON | 82.09 | 5.2 | ValorEnergy | VAI | 2.91 | 2.4 | VeraBradley | VRA | 5.53 | 6.2 | Visa | V | 391.81 | 1.0 | Vylor | VYLR | 75.94 | 3.7 | WF | WFF | 50.60 | 40.6 | ToromGroup | WYES | 15.75 | 1.9 | XP | XP | 32.73 | 1.2 | X3Acqn | XCBE | 10.04 | 0.1 | ZimIntShipping | ZIM | 30.98 | 3.0 | LgRs | 18.00 | A | ACRpc | 17.09 - 12.9 | 17.00 | A | ACRPd | 14.05 - 6.3 | 13.00 | ADlGldStr | ADlg | 16.49 0.9 | 12.00 | AMASSBrands | AMSS | 0.32 1.8 | 11.00 | AMTD Idea | AMTD | 0.42 - 18.4 | 10.00 | ASP Isotopes | ASPI | 2.41 - 7.9 | 10.00 | ATCA Creativity | AACG | 0.66 1.7 | 9.00 | AT&T Nts 2066 | TBB | 18.29 - 1.0 | 8.00 | AT&T PfdC | TFC | 15.62 - 1.1 | 7.00 | AT&T Health | ATHT | 1.00 - 1.0 | 6.00 | abrdnGblInfrmCF | ASGlr | 0.01 31.1 | 5.00 | AccendaHealth | ACH | 0.38 - 8.8 | 1.00 | Accuracy | ARAY | 0.21 - 5.0 | 1.00 | ActuateTherap | ACTU | 0.60 5.5 | 1.00 | AdicetBio | ACET | 5.17 - 1.4 | 1.00 | AegonNts2049 | AEFC | 17.01 - 2.4 | 1.00 | AeroVironment | AVAV | 131.50 - 4.1 | 1.00 | AleratedNts54 | MGRE | 20.30 - 1.0 | 1.00 | Ainos | AIMD | 1.10 - 5.8 | 1.00 | Akanda | AKAN | 1.64 - 6.8 | 1.00 | AkebiaTherap | AKBA | 0.77 - 1.4 | 1.00 | Algorhythm | RIME | 0.13 - 2.6 | 1.00 | AltisourcePtfWt | ASPSZ | 0.13 - 6.9 | 1.00 | Amarin | AMRN | 11.39 - 4.2 | 1.00 | AmerBatteryTech | ABAT | 1.83 - 7.1 | 1.00 | AmgeniVanguard | AMGN | 1.83 - 7.1 | 1.00 | AnfieldEnergy | AEC | 3.11 - 4.9 | 1.00 | AppliedAerospace | AADX | 10.71 - 5.9 | 1.00 | AquaMetals | AQMS | 1.64 - 2.0 | 1.00 | ArloRebery | ABR | 2.77 - 1.4 | Stock | Sym | 52-Wk Hi/Lo | % Chg | ArborRealtyPrfd | ABRpD | 11.89 | -1.2 | ArborRealtyPrfF | ABRpF | 14.20 | -0.9 | ArborRealtyPrte | ABPRe | 11.78 | -2.1 | ArcadiaBiosci | RKDA | 0.21 | -14.5 | ArgoBlockchain | ARBK | 2.00 | -3.8 | Agree | BCE | 0.19 | -1.7 | ArrayTech | ARRY | 3.54 | -2.2 | ArriveAI | ARAI | 0.13 | -0.7 | ArteloBiosci | ARTL | 3.11 | -4.6 | ArtisanPtrsAsset | APAM | 31.78 | -3.1 | AsburyAutomotive | ABG | 163.69 | -2.2 | AshfordHosp | AHT | 1.74 | -14.7 | AshfordHospFid | AHTpD | 3.50 | -0.5 | AspenInsPrd | ASHL | 21.73 | -2.3 | AspenElectric | AME | 1.14 | -3.4 | AtlasCriticalMnl | ATCX | 2.38 | -8.5 | AtlasLithium | ATLX | 2.07 | -8.7 | AttoviaTherap | ATTO | 14.44 | -10.0 | aTyrPharma | ATYR | 0.21 | -12.8 | AuroralinnowWt | AUROW | 0.02 | -22.7 | authiD | AUDI | 0.31 | -7.8 | Aware | AWRE | 1.00 | -3.8 | AGG Foods | AGG | 2.37 | 1.7 | BHAVAcqnRt | BHARV | 0.12 | -5.4 | Bio-key | BKYI | 1.55 | -1.2 | BairdMedInv | BMDM | 0.66 | -2.7 | BallardPower | BLDP | 1.82 | -4.2 | BankofAmPrFdLL | BACpN | 17.70 | -0.7 | BioAmericaPfdN | BACpO | 15.57 | -0.4 | BankofAmPrdPP | BACpP | 15.00 | BankofAmPrdQ | BACpQ | 15.00 | BarrFreshBio | BRHS | 0.21 | -14.5 | BarrFreshFood | BRFH | 0.65 | -5.5 | Beeline | BLNE | 0.67 | -1.9 | BetterHome&Fin | BETR | 8.72 | -6.7 | BeyondMeat | BYND | 7.22 | -5.1 | BigBear.ai | BBAI | 2.28 | -3.8 | bioAffinityTech | BIAF | 3.76 | -17.5 | BiodexaPharm | BDRX | 0.38 | -16.7 | BioInvestor | BIVS | 2.14 | -1.2 | BioRestorative | BRTX | 1.70 | -8.4 | BikRcCapAlloTrmRt | BCATr | 0.00 | -25.0 | BlackstoneMtg | BXMT | 10.75 | -1.8 | BlendLabs | BLND | 0.95 | -0.6 | BlueGold | BGL | 0.16 | -0.2 | BootBarn | BOOT | 117.67 | ... | BradburyCapital | BBCI | 4.90 | -26.9 | BridgeBioOncology | BBIO | 1.57 | -1.5 | BradyneusPrfdA | BHFAO | 13.51 | -1.5 | BrighthouseFinlPC | BFHAN | 10.77 | -1.6 | BrookfieldFinNts | BNH | 14.12 | -1.4 | BrunswickNts2049 | BcPC | 22.08 | 0.2 | BuildersFirst | BLDR | 51.93 | -1.3 | CDT Equity | CDT | 0.63 | -8.1 | CDT EquityWt | CDTW | 0.00 | -76.7 | CISO Global | CISO | 0.17 | -9.6 | CiticorpEnyFds | EMPC | 15.32 | -1.4 | C3ls | CISL | 0.64 | -13.0 | CaballettaBio | CABA | 1.78 | -7.3 | CadrenalTherap | CVKD | 0.82 | -4.1 | CalcMedica | CALC | 1.19 | -5.1 | CalidBiotherap | CLD | 0.94 | -7.8 | CanopyGrowth | CGC | 0.74 | -8.4 | CapitalOnePfd | COPI | 16.25 | -1.8 | CapitalOnePfdL | COPIpL | 16.11 | -1.9 | Capstone | CPNS | 14.11 | -0.4 | Capstone | CAPS | 0.13 | -2.8 | cbMD | YCBD | 0.36 | -8.6 | Cellectis | CLLS | 1.14 | -6.3 | Centrex | CETX | 1.92 | -6.3 | CentrusEnergy | LEU | 134.46 | -5.0 | CenturyCasinos | CNTY | 0.82 | -2.1 | CerebrasSystems | CRS | 145.75 | -10.7 | CharlLcomms | CHTR | 1.63 | -0.9 | CharterCommPlsE | CHTRP | 21.45 | -1.1 | ChengHeAcplIIWt | CHEW | 0.06 | 20.4 | Stock | Sym | Close | Net Chg | QuestDiag | DGX | 232.63 | 1.66 | R S | RBC Bearings | RBC | 510.00 | 6.32 | RB Global | RBA | 87.80 | 1.96 | RELX | RELX | 36.54 | 0.41 | RPM | RPM | 97.57 | -0.16 | RTX | RTX | 186.66 | 0.69 | RalphLauren | RL | 373.24 | 1.96 | Rambus | RMBS | 101.04 | -6.43 | RangeResources | RRC | 41.42 | 0.53 | RaymondJames | RJF | 158.65 | 0.27 | RealtyIncome | O | 54.70 | 0.52 | Reddit | RDDT | 159.93 | 0.02 | RegalRexnord | RRX | 163.15 | -1.88 | RegencyCtrs | REG | 71.71 | -0.34 | RegenPharm | REGN | 762.81 | 16.27 | RegionsFinl | RF | 27.37 | 0.34 | ReinsGrp | RGA | 259.95 | 3.97 | Reliance | RS | 401.12 | -1.33 | RenaissanceRe | RNR | 338.87 | 7.49 | Rentokillnit | RTO | 20.26 | 0.02 | Repligen | RGEN | 172.51 | -1.37 | RepublicSvcs | RSG | 219.75 | 2.87 | ResMed | RMD | 234.60 | 4.55 | RestaurantBrands | QSR | 71.12 | 0.17 | RevolutionMed | RVMD | 193.95 | 4.19 | Revity | RVTY | 155.61 | 1.43 | RioTinto | RIO | 94.30 | -0.48 | Rivian | RIVN | 13.54 | -0.42 | Robinhood | HOOD | 109.22 | 0.20 | Roblox | RBLX | 49.58 | 1.49 | RocketCos. | RKT | 10.87 | -0.61 | RocketLab | RKLb | 65.71 | -2.50 | Rockwell | ROK | 433.97 | 1.38 | RogersComm B | RCI | 29.90 | 0.12 | RoivantSciences | ROIV | 34.59 | -0.85 | Roku | ROKU | 152.81 | -0.04 | Rollins | ROL | 32.07 | 0.09 | RoperTech | ROP | 367.32 | 3.23 | RossStores | ROST | 225.84 | 3.43 | RoyalBkCanada | RY | 192.76 | 0.85 | RoyalCaribbean | RCL | 280.67 | -1.59 | RoyalGold | RGLD | 236.91 | 0.68 | RoyaltyPharma | RPRX | 57.78 | 0.85 | Rubrik | RBRK | 120.01 | -5.13 | RyanSpecialty | RYAN | 37.25 | 0.24 | Ryanair | RYAI | 53.00 | -1.24 | RyderSystem R | 237.51 | -1.04 | SAP | SAP | 217.85 | 3.07 | S&P Global | SPGI | 412.19 | 4.37 | SBA Comm | SBAC | 184.28 | 1.79 | SEI Investments | SEIC | 105.00 | 0.30 | SK hynix | SKHY | 162.23 | -6.80 | SK Telecom | KEM | 33.49 | -0.78 | SLB | SLB | 48.77 | -0.19 | SS&C Tech | SSNC | 80.99 | -0.04 | Saia | SAIA | 337.52 | 0.77 | SailPoint | SAIL | 19.57 | -1.20 | Salesforce | CRM | 233.92 | 4.79 | Samsara | IOT | 41.62 | 0.07 | Sandisk | SNDK | 1827.33 | -94.49 | Sanmina | SANM | 213.74 | -3.75 | Sanofi | SNY | 39.74 | -0.33 | Sasol | SSL | 15.30 | 0.19 | SchwabC | SCHW | 97.06 | 0.36 | Sea | SE | 95.88 | 0.63 | Seagate | STX | 753.25 | -29.75 | Sempra | SRE | 81.88 | 0.54 | Semtech | SMTC | 168.28 | -19.02 | SentinelOne | S | 25.66 | -0.61 | ServiceIntl | SCI | 77.74 | 0.83 | ServiceNow | NOW | 140.32 | -0.54 | SharkNinja | SN | 189.98 | 5.00 | Shell | SHEL | 101.59 | 1.41 | SherwinWilliams | SHW | 320.21 | 0.85 | ShinhanFin | SHG | 75.21 | -0.31 | Shopify | SHOP | 179.22 | 8.37 | SiliconMotion | SIMO | 246.95 | -16.95 | SimonProperty | SPG | 201.41 | 1.99 | SiriusXM | SIRI | 26.61 | 0.10 | SiTime | SITM | 570.07 | -42.30 | Skydance | SKYD | 9.16 | ... | Skyworks | SWKS | 74.70 | -1.65 | Smith&Nephew | SNN | 27.67 | 0.43 | Smucker | SJM | 120.02 | 0.19 | SmurfitWestrock | SW | 41.07 | -0.22 | Snap | SNAP | 6.53 | 0.30 | Snap-On | SNA | 361.99 | 1.62 | Snowflake | SNOW | 360.37 | -8.52 | SOQUIMICH | SQM | 62.47 | -1.44 | SoFiTech | SOFI | 15.23 | -0.57 | SolstecAdvMatis | SOLS | 60.71 | -0.64 | Solventum | SOLV | 85.31 | -1.98 | Somnigroup | SGI | 42.40 | -0.21 | Sony | SONY | 26.46 | 0.12 | Southern | SO | 87.04 | 0.87 | SoCopper | SCO | 208.69 | -0.52 | SouthStateBk | SSB | 100.77 | 0.52 | SouthwestAir | LUV | 40.76 | -0.90 | SpaceX | SPCX | 163.42 | 0.85 | Spotify | SPOT | 528.80 | -0.34 | Stanley&B&D | SWK | 88.65 | 0.08 | Starbucks | SBUX | 92.29 | 1.54 | StateStreet | STT | 174.93 | -0.03 | SteelDynamics | STLD | 239.14 | 0.76 | Stellantis | STLA | 4.38 | -0.10 | Steris | STE | 218.98 | 4.58 | SterlingInfr | STRL | 501.19 | -11.81 | StifelFinancial | SF | 70.04 | -0.30 | STMicroelec | STM | 50.48 | -1.58 | Strategy | MSTR | 152.68 | -1.66 | Stryker | SYK | 282.60 | 5.27 | SumitomoMits | SMFG | 25.03 | -0.10 | SummitTherap | SMMT | 17.13 | -0.46 | SunComms | SUI | 114.46 | 0.46 | SunLifeFinancial | SLF | 77.34 | 0.35 | SunbeltRentals | SUNB | 75.56 | 0.39 | SuncorEnergy | SU | 73.51 | 1.28 | Sunoco | SUN | 75.53 | -0.07 | SuperMicroComp | SMCI | 39.98 | -1.88 | Suzano | SUZ | 8.53 | -0.04 | Symbotic | SYM | 40.78 | -1.85 | SynchronyFinl | SYF | 73.62 | 0.82 | Synopsys | SNPs | 502.51 | -7.48 | Sysco | SYY | 78.70 | 0.56 | Stock | Sym | Close | NetChg | TakedaPharm TAK | 18.68 | -0.05 | TalenEnergy TLN | 379.77 | 1.20 | Tapestry TPR | 117.22 | 0.98 | TargaResources TRGP | 290.54 | 3.84 | Target TGT | 153.62 | -0.02 | TechnipFMC FTI | 69.75 | 0.18 | TeckResourcesB TECK | 67.54 | -0.51 | TeledyneTech TDY | 613.66 | ... | Ericsson ERIC | 9.37 | -0.19 | TelefonicaBras VIV | 12.16 | -0.04 | TelekomIndns TLK | 12.78 | -0.05 | TempusAI TEM | 67.99 | -2.94 | 10xGenomics TGX | 75.19 | -5.46 | Tenaris TS | 58.05 | 0.71 | TencentMusic TME | 8.45 | 0.07 | TenetHealthcare THC | 268.76 | 4.98 | Teradyne TER | 383.85 | -18.83 | Tesla TSLA | 378.03 | -4.60 | TevaPharmInds TEVA | 41.17 | 0.07 | TexasInstruments TXN | 281.74 | -2.00 | TexasPacLand TPL | 365.32 | 4.34 | TexasRoadhouse TXRH | 158.81 | -2.69 | Textron TXT | 75.78 | 1.62 | ThermoFisher TMO | 662.24 | 4.22 | ThomsonReuters TRI | 104.25 | 1.04 | 3M MMM | 160.89 | 0.93 | Toast TOST | 31.32 | 0.01 | TollBros TOL | 132.15 | -0.98 | Toro TTC | 96.65 | 0.86 | TorontoDomBk TD | 116.49 | 1.39 | TotalEnergies TTE | 88.37 | 2.26 | TowerSemi TSEM | 216.50 | -12.21 | ToyotaMotor TM | 184.72 | -0.58 | TractorSupply TSCO | 33.45 | -0.25 | Tradeweb TW | 110.63 | -0.45 | TraneTech TT | 477.55 | 0.57 | TransDigm TDG | 1119.94 | 11.95 | TransUnion TRU | 66.07 | 0.59 | Travelers TRV | 371.68 | 2.93 | Trimble TRMB | 59.49 | -0.60 | Trip.com TCOM | 38.76 | -0.14 | TruistFinl TFC | 46.64 | 0.53 | Twilio TWLO | 282.66 | -6.81 | TwistBiosci TWST | 151.86 | -7.92 | TylerTech TYL | 339.94 | 10.39 | TysonFoods TSN | 53.57 | 0.14 | UBS Group UBS | 47.82 | -0.31 | UDR UDR | 34.02 | -0.10 | U-Haul UHAL | 56.22 | -1.17 | U-Haul N UHALB | 49.55 | -0.82 | UL Solutions ULS | 71.18 | 1.19 | UMB Fin UMBF | 131.27 | 0.97 | US Foods USFD | 97.70 | 0.27 | Uber UBER | 71.50 | -0.01 | Ubiquiti UI | 619.56 | -37.73 | UltaBeauty ULTA | 567.47 | -2.90 | Unilever UL | 62.95 | 0.69 | UnionPacific UNP | 281.57 | 3.23 | UnitedAirlines UAL | 104.44 | -3.02 | UnitedMicro UMC | 22.55 | -0.41 | UPS B UPS | 95.34 | 0.77 | UnitedRentals URE | 1056.92 | 0.55 | US Bancorp USB | 177.42 | 0.94 | UnitedTherap UTHR | 559.42 | 0.94 | UnitySoftware UNH | 378.52 | -0.78 | UnitySoftware U | 46.68 | -0.20 | UniversalHealthUHS | 178.83 | 1.48 | UnumGroup UNM | 92.51 | 0.84 | VICI Prop VICI | 23.03 | 0.15 | Vale VALE | 13.52 | -0.10 | ValeroEnergy VLO | 436.00 | 2.25 | ValmontInds VMI | 467.08 | -0.73 | Vaxcyte PCVX | 70.65 | -0.73 | VeevaSystems VEEV | 295.85 | -0.28 | Ventas VTR | 83.54 | 1.50 | VentureGlobal VG | 13.13 | -0.03 | Veralto VLTO | 98.20 | 1.27 | VeriSign VRSN | 302.70 | -1.04 | VeriskAnalytics VRSK | 177.49 | -0.14 | Verizon VZ | 42.78 | 1.13 | VertexPharm VRTX | 507.00 | -3.08 | Vertiv VRT | 239.36 | -3.42 | ViaSat SATV | 67.66 | -4.35 | Viatris VTRS | 17.54 | -0.10 | ViaviSolutions VIAV | 41.75 | -3.71 | Vicor VICR | 259.40 | -6.67 | Viking VIK | 80.77 | -0.85 | ViperEnergy VNOM | 43.37 | 0.38 | VirtuFinancial VIRT | 56.77 | -0.74 | Visa V | 389.27 | 3.82 | Vistra VST | 158.13 | -3.35 | VivmarkResidential VMKR | 61.25 | 0.09 | Vodafone VOD | 15.39 | -0.17 | VulcanMatls VMC | 245.15 | 0.57 | Vylor VYLR | 75.89 | 2.74 | TUV | TC Energy | TRP | 60.56 | 0.51 | TD Synnex | SNX | 273.06 | -0.31 | TE Connectivity | TEL | 217.28 | -1.01 | Telus | TU | 7.79 | 0.07 | Ternium | TX | 57.94 | -0.24 | TFI Intl | TFII | 112.81 | -1.32 | TJX | TJX | 141.92 | 3.16 | TKO | TKO | 173.45 | -4.56 | T-MobileUS | TMUS | 151.87 | 3.29 | TPG | TPG | 45.12 | -0.14 | T.RowePrice | TROW | 103.99 | -1.17 | TTM Tech | TTMI | 110.33 | -10.68 | TaiwanSemi | TSM | 444.35 | -8.96 | Take-TwoSftwr | TTWO | 208.82 | -4.62 | Stock | Sym | 52-Wk Hi/Lo | % Chg | CherryHillPfdA | CHMPa | 19.64 | -1.9 | ChicagoAirRealEst | REFI | 9.25 | -0.7 | ChildrensPfCase | PLCE | 1.25 | -7.7 | CinnaTech | CIM | 8.72 | -2.2 | ChinaSXTPharm | SXTC | 0.09 | -31.4 | ChinaYuchai | CYD | 27.87 | -5.6 | CitrusLogic | CRUS | 105.77 | -0.5 | ClarosMtg | CMTG | 1.15 | ... | CleanEnerFuels | CLNE | 1.41 | -4.1 | ClearSignTech | CLR | 2.98 | -7.8 | Coincheck | CNCK | 1.29 | -3.0 | comScore | SCORE | 3.80 | -2.5 | ContextTherap | CTIX | 0.29 | -1.1 | ComcastTherap | CTAM | 8.43 | -36.0 | CorbusPharm | CRBP | 5.13 | -2.0 | CoreAI | CHAI | 0.21 | -7.3 | CrownCrafts | CRWS | 2.34 | 1.7 | CrownReserveRt | CRACR | 0.10 | -0.1 | Cullen/FrostPfdB | CFRPB | 15.36 | -0.9 | CVRx | CVRX | 1.47 | -6.3 | Cyaba | CYAB | 0.16 | -9.7 | Cyng | CYN | 0.48 | -8.8 | CytoxMTherap | CTMX | 2.51 | -5.8 | Coralbents | CTSO | 3.51 | -5.3 | DefenseTechWt | DFSCW | 0.01 | -57.0 | DPC | DPC | 35.86 | -7.3 | DarioHealth | DRIO | 5.33 | -6.6 | Darkris | DKI | 0.13 | -58.1 | DatavaultAI | DVLT | 0.13 | -7.7 | DecoyTherap | DCOY | 1.41 | -2.7 | DeepFission | FISIN | 4.12 | -6.1 | DermataTherap | DRMA | 0.89 | -12.8 | DelphiAutoRx | DLFO | 2.28 | -10.0 | DigitalRealtyPfJ | DLRplJ | 18.02 | -0.4 | DolphinEnt | DLPN | 0.95 | -7.9 | DragonflyEnergy | DFLI | 3.11 | -6.2 | DreamFinders | DFH | 8.93 | -4.8 | Dreamland | TDIC | 1.66 | -1.8 | DutchBros | BROS | 36.51 | -2.0 | EagleMaterials | EXP | 163.51 | -0.7 | EdibleGarden | EDBL | 1.04 | -2.8 | ElectraBratMyTrip | ELBM | 0.47 | -3.1 | EmersonDiscSecs | EMD | 0.14 | -6.4 | EnergyFuels | UEUU | 9.60 | -3.0 | Enhanced | ENHA | 1.06 | 20.0 | EntergyBds66 | EAI | 18.36 | -1.2 | EntergyLA Bds66 | ELC | 18.08 | -1.5 | EntergyMS Bds | EMP | 18.22 | -1.1 | EosEnergyEntsWt | EOSEW | 1.50 | -10.8 | EosEnergy | EOSE | 2.35 | -5.2 | ErayakPwr | RAYA | 1.61 | -4.7 | Everglwco | EWG | 0.61 | -1.4 | EveHoldingWt | VEUWJS | 0.03 | -14.5 | EVgo | EVGO | 1.11 | -9.0 | EvolutionGbl | EVOXU | 9.83 | -0.2 | EvolutionMtls | EMAT | 1.28 | -10.4 | EvolTech | EVLV | 4.32 | -4.6 | Evotec | EVO | 1.36 | -10.5 | F&GAnnuities | FG | 18.90 | -1.9 | F&GAnnuitiesNts | FGNN | 22.96 | -1.0 | FMC | FMC | 8.03 | -0.4 | FVIA Infra | FIP | 2.53 | -2.6 | FTC Solar | FTCI | 1.79 | -5.2 | Fathom | FTHM | 0.19 | -6.5 | FedAgriMtgPfdG | AGMpG | 16.15 | -1.2 | Femasys | FEMY | 1.71 | -12.5 | Fermi | FRMI | 3.20 | -5.2 | FervoEnergy | FRVO | 12.78 | -6.4 | FirstCitizensPfdA | FCNCP | 17.61 | -1.1 | FivePoint | FPH | 4.38 | -1.8 | FrontForeTechWt | FTHAW | 0.17 | -22.8 | Freshworks | GMCSK | 1.68 | -0.4 | ForesightAuto | FRSX | 0.78 | -6.8 | FrankBSP PfdE | FBRTpE | 17.41 | -0.8 | FreedomMetalsAcqn | FDMMM | 9.89 | ... | Freightos | CRGO | 0.79 | -5.0 | FrontierNuclear | FNUC | 1.04 | -0.9 | FultonFinlPfdA | FULTP | 16.21 | -3.1 | FusemachSystemsWt | FUSEW | 0.02 | -44.7 | FuturewaveAcqnRt | FWACR | 0.11 | -8.2 | GuangzhouTechs | GMCX | 1.68 | -1.8 | GSI Tech | GSIT | 4.42 | -6.4 | GalataAcqnllWt | LATAW | 0.18 | -16.3 | GameYourGame | GGY | 0.44 | -3.6 | GBankFinl | GBFH | 17.02 | -1.3 | GilatSatellite | GILT | 8.27 | -6.0 | W | X | Y | Z | WEC Energy | WEC | 104.91 | 1.17 | W.P.Carey | WPC | 64.29 | 0.92 | Wabtec | WAB | 285.77 | 0.34 | Walmart | WMT | 113.08 | 1.73 | WarnerMusic | WMG | 28.65 | -0.07 | WasteConnections | WCN | 153.71 | 0.88 | WasteMgt | WM | 211.14 | 2.31 | Waters | WAT | 432.10 | -1.67 | Watsco B | WS0B | 287.50 | -23.40 | Watsco | WSO | 286.32 | 6.42 | WattsWater | WTS | 351.65 | -1.07 | Wayfair | W | 106.14 | 0.40 | WellsFargo | WFC | 83.32 | -0.23 | Welltower | WELL | 230.29 | 4.82 | WescoIntl | WCC | 361.34 | -4.35 | WestPharmSvcs | WST | 367.60 | 1.60 | WesternDigital | WDC | 386.94 | -10.34 | WesternMidstrm | WES | 45.29 | -0.33 | Weyerhaeuser | WY | 18.94 | -0.16 | WheatonPrecMts | WPM | 138.11 | -0.54 | Williams | WMB | 74.17 | 1.50 | Williams-Sonoma | WSM | 238.86 | -2.92 | WillisTowers | WTW | 298.43 | 2.17 | WintrustFinl | WTFC | 144.20 | 0.95 | Wipro | WIP | 1.70 | Wise | WSE | 11.94 | 0.07 | WoodsideEnergy | WDS | 22.74 | 0.17 | Woodward | WWD | 332.56 | -2.95 | WoorFinl | WF | 72.29 | -0.63 | Workday | WDAY | 188.25 | 1.66 | XP | XP | 32.60 | 0.38 | XPO | XPO | 180.52 | -2.95 | XcelEnergy | XEL | 74.17 | 0.39 | XPeng | XPEV | 9.66 | -0.24 | Xylem | XYL | 102.59 | -0.12 | YPF | YPF | 51.97 | 1.93 | Yum!Brands | YUM | 146.75 | 1.93 | YumChina | YUMC | 42.48 | -0.08 | ZTO Express | ZTO | 20.45 | 0.30 | ZebraTech | ZBRA | 388.12 | 0.94 | ZimmerBiomet | ZBH | 92.17 | 3.03 | ZionsBancorp | ZION | 62.68 | 0.19 | Zoetis | ZTS | 75.65 | 0.84 | ZoomComms | ZM | 97.94 | 0.20 | Zscaler | ZS | 225.78 | -7.95 | Stock | Sym | 52-Wk Hi/Lo | % Chg | GlassHouseBrands | GLAS | 3.84 | -4.2 | GlobalMofyA1 | GMM | 1.58 | -4.4 | Goodyear | GT | 4.46 | -4.1 | GossamerBio | GOSS | 8.99 | -0.3 | GrabWt | GRABW | 0.01 | -17.6 | GrabAGun | PEW | 1.84 | -1.1 | GrandeLand | GRD | 1.42 | -2.8 | GranitePointMtg | GPMT | 5.89 | -8.6 | GraphicPkg | GPK | 6.15 | -1.3 | GrayMediaA | GTNA | 4.52 | -1.0 | GreenCircle | GCOT | 0.41 | -4.1 | GuardforceAI | GFAI | 0.23 | -7.9 | GuardianMetal | GMTL | 7.14 | -4.5 | HCW Biologics | HCWB | 1.47 | -7.5 | HadronEnergy | HORN | 0.76 | -22.3 | HoneyTrs2006 | HONZ | 0.65 | -1.6 | Haoxin | HXNX | 0.27 | -10.5 | HawaiianElec | HE | 8.56 | -1.1 | HawkEye360 | HAWK | 13.38 | -1.8 | Hayward | HAYW | 11.24 | 1.5 | HealthtrarThle | HCTI | 0.41 | -10.7 | High-TrendIntl | HTCO | 0.90 | -17.8 | HormelFoods | HRL | 19.06 | 0.6 | HousetopDoga | HQQD | 1.10 | -2.9 | HuadianPfdA | HWINP | 16.65 | -1.0 | HuachenAlPgk | HCAI | 0.37 | -19.3 | Humacyte | HUMA | 0.39 | -3.9 | ICZOOMA | IZM | 0.86 | -2.0 | IM Cannabis | IMCC | 1.40 | -7.6 | IdahoStratRscs | IDR | 22.10 | -3.6 | ImpactBioMed | IBD | 4.00 | -5.2 | IntelligentBio | INBS | 1.50 | -1.3 | IntuitiveTherap | INTU | 2.14 | -1.2 | InteractStrength | TRNR | 2.02 | -1.2 | Inuvo | INUV | 0.46 | -3.1 | Inventiva | IVA | 3.10 | -1.3 | iPower | IPW | 0.51 | -13.6 | IronDomAcqnWt | DACW | 0.22 | -15.4 | JetBlue | JBLU | 3.62 | -5.7 | Jiayin | JFIN | 1.22 | -6.3 | JinkoSolar | JKS | 8.30 | -2.8 | KimcoVocabulary | KMBY | 0.13 | -1.3 | Joint | JYNT | 6.92 | -1.4 | JPMorganPfdDD | JPMpd | 21.14 | -0.1 | KALA BIO | KALA | 0.28 | -4.7 | KB Home | KBH | 41.57 | -3.5 | KIDZAI | KIDZ | 1.97 | -3.3 | KairosPharma | KAPA | 0.74 | 2.7 | KalariisTherap | KLRS | 2.22 | -4.2 | KandalWenture | KMPF | 8.11 | -1.8 | KeurigDrPepper | KPTI | 0.50 | -16.5 | KestrelGr6.625-46 | MHLA | 5.80 | 1.6 | KeyTronic | KTCC | 2.04 | -2.8 | KeyCorpPtfD | KEYpJ | 18.56 | -1.5 | KeyCorpPtfDg | KEYpK | 18.50 | -1.5 | Knightscope | KSCP | 0.59 | -2.4 | KoreaElecPwr | KEP | 10.58 | -3.9 | KustomEnt | KUST | 7.35 | -2.0 | Linde | LCN | 77.50 | -1.4 | LG Display | LPL | 2.73 | -4.8 | LaRosa | LRHC | 1.08 | -7.5 | Lakewood-Amedex | LABT | 0.73 | -6.5 | LanternPharma | LTRN | 0.72 | -9.3 | LarimarTherap | LRMR | 2.53 | -5.2 | LaunchOneWt | LPAW | 0.08 | -10.0 | LeaderSadvtyAcqn | LEDRu | 9.94 | -0.1 | LexinFintech | LX | 0.64 | -3.6 | LexinIntertl | LBGI | 1.29 | -7.4 | LifeMD | LFMD | 2.53 | -3.0 | Lightbridge | LTBR | 5.72 | -5.6 | LionGroup | LGIHL | 2.98 | -1.6 | Lipocine | LPCN | 1.59 | -3.5 | LisataTherap | LSTA | 0.98 | -0.9 | LithiumAmericas | LAC | 2.22 | -4.3 | IoanDepot | LDI | 0.56 | 3.6 | LotusTech | LOT | 3.62 | -6.7 | LogitechIntl | LOGI | 1.43 | -6.3 | LuckyStrike | LUCK | 4.87 | 3.0 | LumenTech | LUMN | 4.99 | -4.4 | Lyntris | LYNX | 11.20 | -1.4 | M&T Bank Pfd K | MTBpk | 21.39 | -0.7 | MFA Financial | MFA | 6.65 | -2.9 | MGM Resorts | MGAM | 28.72 | 0.2 | MidwellTechWt | MIDWW | 0.01 | -24.1 | Continued on Page B9

COMMODITIES

---

Futures Contracts

Notes on data:

Policy Rates

Largest 100 exchange-traded funds, latest session.

Metal & Petroleum Futures | | Contract | Settle | Chg | Open interest | Open | High | hi lo | Copper-High (CMX)-25,000 lbs.; $ per lb. | Oct | 6.6895 | 6.7255 | 6.6985 | 0.0560 | 1,627 | Dec | 6.7120 | 6.7830 | 6.7470 | 0.0550 | 160,642 | Gold (CMX)-100 troy oz.; $ per troy oz. | Oct | 4176.60 | 4194.60 | 4165.80 | -25.20 | 223 | Nov | 4205.70 | 4227.20 | 4175.60 | -25.50 | 3,993 | Dec | 4220.80 | 4242.30 | 4178.10 | -25.70 | 319,173 | Jan'27 | 4232.30 | 4260.40 | 4199.70 | -25.90 | 642 | Feb | 4252.40 | 4276.30 | 4225.60 | -25.90 | 42,757 | March | 4286.30 | 4288.20 | 4242.20 | -25.80 | 269 | Palladium (NYM) - 50 troy oz; $ per troy oz. | Oct | 1215.00 | 1215.00 | 1136.10 | -4.40 | Dec | 1151.00 | 1166.00 | 1145.80 | -4.60 | 21,680 | Platinum (NYM)-50 troy oz.; $ per troy oz. | Oct | 1693.50 | 1693.80 | 1679.40 | 0.10 | 16 | Jan'27 | 1696.00 | 1716.30 | 1693.50 | 0.20 | 52,816 | Silver (CMX)-5,000 troy oz.; $ per troy oz. | Oct | 60.755 | 60.755 | 60.141 | -0.529 | 370 | Dec | 61.290 | 61.745 | 60.513 | -0.535 | 82,502 | Crude Oil, Light Sweet (NYM)-1,000 bbls; $ per bbl. | Nov | 91.83 | 94.36 | 93.74 | 1.89 | 171,665 | Dec | 90.98 | 93.43 | 92.86 | 1.85 | 267,219 | Jan'27 | 89.99 | 92.37▲ | 91.86 | 1.86 | 128,840 | June | 84.03 | 85.98▲ | 85.81 | 1.86 | 128,675 | Dec | 77.38 | 78.84▲ | 78.72 | 1.33 | 180,252 | Dec'28 | 71.27 | 72.01 | 71.69 | 0.62 | 113,386 | NY Harbor ULSD (NYM)-42,000 gal; $ per gal. | Nov | 4.6742 | 4.7814 | 4.7232 | -.0152 | 56,484 | Dec | 4.5292 | 4.6376 | 4.5868 | -.0016 | 52,299 | Gasoline-NY RBOB (NYM)-42,000 gal; $ per gal. | Nov | 3.2657 | 3.3343 | 3.2917 | -.0035 | 87,763 | Dec | 3.1350 | 3.2029 | 3.1706 | .0172 | 73,589 | Natural Gas (NYM)-10,000 MMBtu; $ per MMBtu. | Nov | 3.170 | 3.204 | 3.167 | -.053 | 263,052 | Dec | 3.506 | 3.536 | 3.506 | -.040 | 222,770 | Jan'27 | 3.939 | 3.969 | 3.932 | -.040 | 206,458 | Feb | 3.543 | 3.569 | 3.553 | -.021 | 113,384 | March | 2.755 | 2.792 | 2.788 | .008 | 219,735 | April | 2.651 | 2.687 | 2.685 | .012 | 151,222 | Agriculture Futures | | Open | Contract | Low | Settle | Chg | Open interest | High | hilo | Rough Rice (CBT)-2,000 cwt; $ per cwt. | Nov | 16.94 | 17.07▲ | 16.52 | 16.96 | .02 | 11,243 | Jan'27 | 17.10 | 17.50▲ | 17.10 | 17.40 | .01 | 2,588 | Wheat (CBT)-5,000 bu; cents per bu. | Dec | 669.75 | 676.00 | 662.00 | 672.25 | 1.25 | 252,568 | March'27 | 684.50 | 689.50 | 676.50 | 686.00 | .75 | 120,762 | Wheat (KC)-5,000 bu; cents per bu. | Dec | 717.00 | 723.50 | 710.50 | 715.25 | -4.00 | 155,928 | March'27 | 730.00 | 735.50 | 723.50 | 728.00 | -3.75 | 77,214 | Cattle-Feeder (CME)-50,000 lbs.; cents per lb. | Oct | 343.975 | 344.025 | 341.550 | 343.475 | -.375 | 6,308 | Nov | 341.500 | 341.950 | 339.125 | 341.100 | -.850 | 21,614 | Cattle-Live (CME)-40,000 lbs.; cents per lb. | Oct | 225.100 | 225.100 | 223.550 | 224.750 | -.225 | 12,948 | Dec | 227.075 | 227.400 | 225.500 | 226.600 | -.450 | 118,229 | Hogs-Lean (CME)-40,000 lbs.; cents per lb. | Oct | 75.625 | 75.675 | 75.075 | 75.600 | .550 | 16,443 | Dec | 68.100 | 69.000 | 67.825 | 68.375 | .550 | 150,055 | Lumber (CME)-27,500 bd. ft., $ per 1,000 bd. ft. | Nov | 537.00 | 542.50 | 537.00 | 539.50 | 6.50 | 8,780 | Jan'27 | 552.00 | 557.00 | 552.00 | 555.50 | 5.00 | 2,015 | Milk (CME)-200,000 lbs., cents per lb. | Oct | 14.97 | 15.03 | 14.91 | 14.96 | -.02 | 5,121 | Nov | 16.07 | 16.12 | 15.80 | 16.07 | -.03 | 7,872 | Cocoa (ICE-US)-10 metric tons; $ per ton. | Dec | 5,700 | 5,801 | 5,554 | 5,676 | 11 | 69,092 | March'27 | 5,819 | 5,915 | 5,679 | 5,801 | 20 | 46,848 | Coffee (ICE-US)-37,500 lbs.; cents per lb. | Dec | 287.50 | 290.95 | 283.50 | 290.60 | 3.65 | 76,316 | March'27 | 279.30 | 283.85 | 276.45 | 283.50 | 3.70 | 47,432 | Sugar-World (ICE-US)-112,000 lbs.; cents per lb. | March | 20.25 | 20.89 | 20.00 | 20.85 | .60 | 639,605 | May | 19.47 | 20.03 | 19.26 | 20.00 | .53 | 186,137 | Sugar-Domestic (ICE-US)-112,000 lbs.; cents per lb. | Jan | 41.95 | 41.95 | 41.95 | 41.95 | -.05 | 1,580 | March | 42.00 | 42.00▲ | 42.00 | 42.00 | ... | 1,760 | Cotton (ICE-US)-50,000 lbs.; cents per lb. | Dec | 80.58 | 80.97 | 79.38 | 80.60 | .06 | 170,443 | March'27 | 83.59 | 84.10 | 82.61 | 83.81 | .22 | 92,475 | Orange Juice (ICE-US)-15,000 lbs.; cents per lb. | Nov | 149.40 | 152.35 | 146.45 | 151.40 | 2.70 | 6,253 | Jan'27 | 151.45 | 155.30 | 150.20 | 154.60 | 3.20 | 2,903 | Interest Rate Futures | Corn (CBT)-5,000 bu.; cents per bu. | Dec | 480.00 | 484.25 | 476.00 | 483.00 | 3.25 | 866,535 | March'27 | 494.50 | 498.00 | 490.25 | 497.25 | 3.00 | 435,516 | Oats (CBT)-5,000 bu.; cents per bu. | Dec | 419.50 | 419.75 | 407.25 | 410.25 | -10.50 | 3,563 | March'27 | 424.50 | 424.50 | 414.50 | 417.75 | -6.75 | 449 | Soybeans (CBT)-5,000 bu.; cents per bu. | Nov | 1289.00 | 1291.00 | 1278.00 | 1287.75 | -4.25 | 350,258 | Jan'27 | 1305.75 | 1307.75 | 1295.25 | 1304.75 | -4.00 | 246,303 | Soybean Meal (CBT)-100 tons; $ per ton. | Oct | 373.50 | 375.30 | 373.20 | 375.60 | 6.90 | 221 | Dec | 364.60 | 369.10 | 360.00 | 368.70 | 3.10 | 278,672 | Soybean Oil (CBT)-60,000 lbs.; cents per lb. | Oct | 67.85 | 67.88 | 67.73 | 68.30 | .58 | 95 | Dec | 68.03 | 68.70 | 67.43 | 68.63 | .61 | 225,315 | Ultra Treasury Bonds (CBT) - $100,000; pts 32nds of 100% | Dec | 104-080 | 104-190 | 104-000 | 104-080 | ... 2,403,262 | March'27 | 103-160 | 103-160 | 103-160 | 104-010 | ... 61 | Treasury Bonds (CBT) - $100,000; pts 32nds of 100% | Dec | 103-070 | 103-150 | 102-290 | 103-050 | 1.0 1,869,513 | March'27 | 102-220 | 102-310 | 102-200 | 102-230 | 1.0 2,703 | Treasury Notes (CBT) - $100,000; pts 32nds of 100% | Dec | 104-190 | 104-230 | 104-140 | 104-180 | -1.0 5,814,620 | March'27 | 104-085 | 104-110 | 104-070 | 104-105 | -1.0 4,997 | 5 Yr. Treasury Notes (CBT) - $100,000; pts 32nds of 100% | Dec | 103-192 | 103-212 | 103-155 | 103-180 | -1.0 6,818,818 | March'27 | 103-132 | 103-132 | 103-132 | 103-110 | -1.2 3,407 | 2 Yr. Treasury Notes (CBT) - $200,000; pts 32nds of 100% | Dec | 101-267 | 101-275 | 101-252 | 101-256 | -1.1 4,510,880 | Monday, October 12, 2026

---

Exchange-Traded Portfolios | wsj.com/market-data/mutualfunds-etfs | ETF | Symbol | Closing Price | Chg (%) | YTD (%) | SSSPDRS&P500V | SPYV | 62.65 | 0.40 | 10.3 | SSIMSPDRS&P500 | SPY | 778.10 | -0.06 | 14.1 | SSTechSel | XLK | 196.36 | -1.22 | 36.4 | VanEckSemicon | SMH | 590.99 | -2.05 | 64.1 | VangdDivApp | VIG | 240.04 | 0.41 | 9.2 | VangdExtMkt | VXF | 233.52 | -0.63 | 11.7 | VangdFTSEAWxUS | VEU | 82.49 | -0.40 | 12.1 | VangdFTSEDevMk | VEA | 69.95 | -0.57 | 12.0 | VangdFTSE EM | VWO | 59.73 | -0.05 | 11.1 | VangdFTSE Europe | VGK | 85.82 | -0.24 | 2.6 | VangdHiDiv | VYM | 159.24 | 0.31 | 11.0 | VangdInfoTech | VGT | 126.51 | -1.15 | 34.3 | VangdIntermBd | BIV | 72.96 | 0.05 | -6.3 | VangdIntrCorpBd | VCIT | 78.50 | 0.11 | -6.3 | VangdIntermTrea | VGIT | 56.71 | 0.02 | -5.4 | VangdMstarGrw | VUG | 91.64 | -0.36 | 12.7 | VangdMstarLC | VV | 359.04 | -0.04 | 14.1 | VangdMstarMegaGr | MGK | 94.08 | -0.36 | 14.0 | VangdMstarMC | VO | 80.92 | -0.27 | 11.5 | VangdMstarSC | VB | 288.16 | -0.46 | 11.7 | VangdMstarSCVal | VBR | 234.71 | 0.12 | 10.8 | VangdMstarTot | VTI | 381.57 | -0.10 | 13.8 | VangdMstarVal | VTV | 221.43 | 0.38 | 15.9 | VangdRealEst | VNQ | 91.36 | 0.78 | 3.2 | VangdRuss1000Grw | VONG | 130.89 | -0.61 | 7.5 | VangdS&P500ETF | VOO | 715.13 | -0.06 | 14.0 | VangdS&P500 Grw | VOOG | 86.92 | -0.42 | 17.3 | VangdST Bond | BSV | 76.39 | 0.01 | -3.1 | VangdSTCpBd | VCSH | 77.36 | 0.08 | -3.0 | VangdShortTrea | VGSH | 57.55 | -0.03 | -2.0 | VangdTaxExemptBd | VTEB | 47.38 | 0.13 | -5.8 | VangdTotalBd | BND | 70.25 | 0.04 | -5.2 | VangdTotIntlBd | BNDX | 46.97 | -0.02 | -2.8 | VangdTotIntlStk | VXUS | 84.44 | -0.45 | 11.9 | VangdTotWrldStk | VT | 159.50 | -0.21 | 13.1 | ETF | Symbol | Closing Price | Chg (%) | YTD (%) | AvantisEM | AVEM | 93.27 | -0.89 | 21.1 | AvantisUSSCValue | AVUV | 119.94 | 0.25 | 17.6 | CapGrpDivVal | CGDV | 49.58 | 0.06 | 13.6 | FidTotalBd | FBND | 43.47 | 0.05 | -5.6 | InvscNasd100 | QQQM | 307.19 | -0.71 | 21.5 | InvscQQQI | QQQ | 746.04 | -0.70 | 21.4 | InvscS&P500EW | RSP | 213.19 | 0.07 | 11.3 | iShBitcoin | IBIT | 46.86 | 0.67 | -5.6 | iShCoreDivGrowth | DGRO | 77.79 | 0.65 | 12.1 | iShCoreMSCIEAFE | IEFA | 96.18 | -0.35 | 7.5 | iShCoreMSCIEM | IEMG | 80.63 | -0.95 | 19.9 | iShMSCIIntlDev | IDEV | 89.01 | -0.22 | 7.9 | iShCoreMSCITotInt | IXUS | 94.57 | -0.44 | 11.7 | iShCoreS&P500 | IVV | 781.44 | -0.07 | 14.1 | iShCoreS&P MC | IJH | 73.16 | -0.37 | 10.8 | iShCoreS&P SC | IJR | 137.47 | -0.06 | 14.4 | iShCoreS&P TotUS | ITOT | 169.43 | -0.14 | 13.9 | iShCoreS&PUSGrw | IUSG | 196.99 | -0.43 | 17.3 | iShCoreUSAggBd | AGG | 94.66 | 0.07 | -5.2 | iShCoreUnivUSDBd | IUSB | 44.15 | 0.02 | -5.1 | iShEdgeMSCIUSAQual | QUAL | 227.72 | 0.26 | 14.7 | iShGoldTr | IAU | 78.34 | -0.67 | -3.5 | iShiBoxx$IGCpBd | LQD | 102.58 | 0.17 | -6.9 | iShMBS | MBB | 89.83 | 0.04 | -5.7 | iShMSCIACWI | ACWI | 160.63 | -0.17 | 13.5 | iShMSCI EAFE | EFA | 103.05 | -0.34 | 7.3 | iShMSCI EM | EEM | 66.15 | -0.97 | 20.9 | iShMSCIEAFEValue | EFV | 78.15 | -0.05 | 9.4 | iShNatlMuniBd | MUB | 101.16 | 0.08 | -5.6 | iShRussMC | IWR | 109.47 | -0.32 | 13.7 | iShRuss1000 | IWB | 424.93 | -0.09 | 13.8 | iShRuss1000Grw | IWF | 127.13 | -0.61 | 7.4 | ETF | Symbol | Closing Price | Chg (%) | YTD (%) | iShRuss1000Val | IWD | 254.65 | 0.44 | 21.1 | iShRuss2000 | IWM | 277.90 | -0.37 | 12.9 | iShS&P500Grw | IVW | 144.62 | -0.43 | 17.3 | iShS&P500Value | IVE | 233.90 | 0.38 | 10.3 | iShSemiconductor | SOXX | 544.85 | -2.60 | 80.9 | iSh7-10YTreaBd | IEF | 89.43 | 0.03 | -7.0 | iShSilver | SLV | 54.35 | -0.78 | -15.6 | iSh20+YTreaBd | TLT | 78.05 | 0.09 | -10.5 | iShUSEqFactRotat | DYNF | 70.40 | -0.04 | 15.8 | iShUSTreasuryBd | GOVT | 21.88 | 0.02 | -5.0 | iSho-3MTreaBd | SGOV | 100.52 | 0.01 | 0.1 | JPMNasdEqPrem | JEPQ | 60.93 | -0.26 | 4.8 | JanusAAACLO | JAAA | 50.55 | 0.04 | -0.1 | JPMEqPremiumIncome | JEPI | 56.96 | 0.33 | -0.5 | JPM UltShIncm | JPST | 50.29 | -0.02 | -0.6 | ProShUltPrQQQ | TQQQ | 79.61 | -2.05 | 51.0 | SPDRGoldMini | GLDM | 82.47 | -0.63 | -3.4 | SPDR Gold | GLD | 382.15 | -0.63 | -3.6 | SchwabFdUSLgCo | FNDX | 32.29 | 0.40 | 18.7 | SchwabIntEquity | SCHF | 27.13 | -0.51 | 12.9 | SchwabUS BrdMkt | SCHB | 29.88 | -0.10 | 13.9 | SchwabUS Div | SCHD | 33.26 | 0.67 | 21.3 | SchwabUS LC | SCHX | 30.63 | -0.03 | 13.8 | SchwabUS LC Grw | SCHG | 36.59 | -0.41 | 12.2 | SSEnergySel | XLE | 66.01 | 1.43 | 47.6 | SSFinlSel | XLF | 55.05 | 0.58 | 0.5 | SSHlthCrSel | XLV | 171.99 | 0.69 | 11.1 | SSlndlSel | XLI | 169.15 | -0.06 | 9.0 | SSSPDRBbg1-3M | BIL | 91.50 | -0.01 | 0.1 | SS SPDR DJIA | DIA | 517.91 | 0.35 | 7.8 | SSSPDRDevxUS | SPDW | 49.69 | -0.58 | 11.9 | SSSPDRS&P500 | SPYM | 91.58 | -0.07 | 14.2 | SSSPDRS&P500G | SPYG | 125.19 | -0.45 | 17.3 | Monday, October 12, 2026

---

Cash Prices | wsj.com/market-data/commodities

These prices reflect buying and selling of a variety of actual or "physical" commodities in the marketplace—separate from the futures price on an exchange, which reflects what the commodity might be worth in future months. | Energy | Coal,C.Aplc.,12500Btu,1.2SO2-r,w | 84.500 | Coal,PwdrRvrBsn,8800Btu,0.8SO2-r,w | 14.650 | Metals | Battery/EV metals | BMI Lithium Carbonate, EXW China, =99.5%-v,w | 18450 | BMI Lithium Hydroxide, EXW China, =56.5%-v,w | 17250 | BMI Cobalt sulphate, EXW China, >20.5%-v,w | 8642 | BMI Nickel Sulphate, EXW China, >22%-v,k | 4172 | BMI Flake Graphite, FOB China, -100 Mesh, 94-95%-v,m | 415 | Gold, per troy oz | Engelhard industrial | 4167.00 | Krugerrand,wholesale-e | n.a. | Maple Leaf-e | n.a. | American Eagle-e | n.a. | Mexican peso-e | n.a. | Austria crown-e | n.a. | Austria phil-e | n.a. | Silver, troy oz. | Engelhard industrial | 60.5500 | Handy & Harman base | n.a. | Handy & Harman fabricated | n.a. | Coins,wholesale $1,000 face-a | 42990 | Other metals | Platinum,Engelhard industrial | 1699.0 | Palladium,Engelhard industrial | 1161.0 | Aluminum, LME, $ per metric ton | *3055.5 | Copper,Comex spot | 6.6985 | Iron Ore, 62% Fe CFR China-s | *90.3 | Steel, HRC USA, FOB Midwest Mill-s | *1260.0 | Fibers and Textiles | Burlap,10-oz,40-inch NY yd-n,w | 1.2375 | Cotton,11/16 std lw-mdMphs-u | 0.7835 | Cotlook 'A' Index-t | *90.65 | Hides,hvy native steers piece fob-u | n.a. | Wool,64s,staple,Terr del-u,w | n.a. | Beef, carcass equiv. index | choice 1-3,600-900 lbs.-u | 344.60 | select 1-3,600-900 lbs.-u | 323.62 | Broilers, National comp wtd. avg.-u,w | 1.1674 | Butter, AA Chicago-d | 1.2700 | Cheddar cheese, bbl, Chicago-d | 145.25 | Cheddar cheese, blk, Chicago-d | 139.00 | Milk, Nonfat dry, Chicago lb.-d | 227.00 | Coffee, Brazilian, Comp-y | 2.8816 | Coffee, Colombian, NY-y | 3.5074 | Eggs, large white, Chicago-u,w | 0.6350 | Flour, hard winter KC-p | 18.00 | Hams, 17-20 lbs, Mid-US fob-u | 0.78 | Hogs, Iowa-So. Minnesota-u | 77.29 | Pork bellies, 12-14 lb MidUS-u | 1.1526 | Pork loins, 13-19 lb MidUS-u | 1.1196 | Steers, Tex.-Okla. Choice-u | n.a. | Steers, feeder, Okla. City-u,w | 374.25 | Grains and Feeds | Bran,wheat middlings, KC-u,w | 155 | Corn,No.2 yellow,Cent IL-bp,u | 4.4800 | Cottonseed meal-u,w | n.a. | Hominy feed,Cent IL-u,w | n.a. | Meat-bonemeal,50% pro Mnpls-u,w | 463 | Oats,No.2 milling,Mnpls-u | 4.0025 | Rice,Long Grain Milled, No.2 AR-u,w | 34.50 | SoybeanMeal,Cent IL,rail,ton48%-u,w | 387.60 | Soybeans,No.1 yllw IL-bp,u | 12.5100 | Wheat,Spring14%-pro Mnpls-u | 8.6625 | Wheat,No.2 soft red,St.Louis-u | 6.5225 | Wheat- Hard - KC (USDA) $ per bu-u | 6.8125 | Wheat,No.1soft white,Portld,OR-u | 6.5000 | Fats and Oils | Degummed corn oil, crude wtd. avg.-u,w | n.a. | Grease,choice white,Chicago-h | 0.6250 | Lard,Chicago-u | n.a. | Soybean oil,crude;Centl IL-u,w | 0.7052 | Tallow,bleach;Chicago-h | 0.7050 | Tallow,edible,Chicago-u | n.a. | KEY TO CODES: A=ask; B=bid; BP=country elevator bids to producers; C=corrected; D=CME; E=Manfra, Tordella & Brookes; H=American Commodities Brokerage Co; K=bi-weekly; M=monthly; N=nominal; n.a.=not quoted or not available; P=Sosland Publishing; R=SNL Energy; S=Platts-TSI; T=Cotlook Limited; U=USDA; V=Benchmark Mineral Intelligence; W=weekly; Y=International Coffee Organization; Z=not quoted. $^{a}$ Data as of 10/9

Source: Dow Jones Market Data

---

Borrowing Benchmarks | wsj.com/market-data/bonds/benchmarks

---

Money Rates

October 12, 2026

Key annual interest rates paid to borrow or lend money in U.S. and international markets. Rates below are a guide to general levels but don't always represent actual transactions.

Inflation | U.S. consumer price index | All items | 334.980 | 0.32 | 3.4 | Core | 338.041 | 0.27 | 2.4 | Latest | Weekago | -52-WEEK-High | Low | Low | n.a. | 3.8000 | 4.0800 | 3.5500 | Bid | n.a. | 3.8800 | 4.1000 | 3.6100 | Offer | n.a. | 3.8900 | 4.1200 | 3.6300 | Latest | Weekago | —52-WEEK—High | Low | Treasury bill auction

International rates | 4 weeks | 3.980 | 3.890 | 4.030 | 3.550 | 13 weeks | 4.050 | 4.050 | 4.110 | 3.540 | 26 weeks | 4.165 | 4.165 | 4.285 | 3.475 | Secured Overnight Financing Rate | 3.87 | 3.88 | 4.31 | Latest | Value Traded | -52-Week -High | Latest | Week ago | -52-Week-High | Low | Prime rates | U.S. | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.25 | 6.75 | Canada | 4.45 | 4.45 | 4.70 | 4.45 | Japan | 2.375 | 2.375 | 2.375 | 1.875 | DTCC GCF Repo Index

Other short-term rates | Latest | Weekago | -52-Week-high | -low | Call money | Treasury | n.a. | n.a. | 4.319 | 3.504 | MBS | n.a. | n.a. | 4.371 | 3.517 | Policy Rates | Euro zone | 2.65 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 2.15 | Switzerland | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.25 | Britain | 3.75 | 3.75 | 4.00 | 3.75 | Australia | 4.60 | 4.60 | 4.60 | 3.60 | Weekly survey | 9.73 | 9.79 | 6.06 | 5.96 | Freddie Mac | Commercial paper (AA financial) | 30-year fixed | 7.40 | 7.28 | 6.30 | 90 days | n.a. | n.a. | 4.16 | 3.57 | 15-year fixed | 6.73 | 6.60 | 5.53 | Overnight repurchase | Overnight repurchase | U.S. | 3.90 | 3.91 | 4.30 | 3.49 | U.S. government rates | Discount | U.S. prime rate is the base rate on corporate loans posted by at least 70% of the 10 largest U.S. banks, and is effective September 17, 2026. Other prime rates aren't directly comparable; lending practices vary widely by location; Discount rate is effective September 17, 2026. Secured Overnight Financing Rate is as of October 9, 2026. DTCC GCF Repo Index is Depository Trust & Clearing Corp.'s weighted average for overnight trades in applicable CUSIPs. Value traded is in billions of U.S. dollars. Federal-funds rates are Tullett Prebon rates as of 3:30 p.m. ET. | Federal funds | Effective rate | n.a. | 3.8900 | 4.1100 | 3.6300 | High | n.a. | 3.9500 | 4.2000 | 3.7000 | Friday, October 9, 2026

Prices of firms' bonds reflect factors including investors' economic, sectoral and company-specific expectations

---

Key Interest Rates

Data delayed due to holiday. | | Contract | Open interest | Open | High hilo | Low | Settle | Chg | March'27 | 101-200 | 101-200 | 101-200 | 101-200 | -1.1 | 640 | 30 Day Federal Funds (CBT) | Oct | 96.1175 | 96.1175 | 96.1150 | 96.1175 | .0025 | 725,289 | Nov | 96.0750 | 96.0800 | 96.0650 | 96.0700 | -.0050 | 547,501 | Three-Month SOFR (CME) | July | 96.2600 | 96.2600▲ | 96.2600 | 96.2600 | ... | 20,743 | Dec | 95.7750 | 95.7750▼ | 95.7540 | 95.7550 | -.0150 | 1,605,672 | wsj.com/market-data/commodities | | Contract | Openinterest | Open | High | hilo | Low | Settle | Euro (CME) -€125,000; $ per € | Oct | 1.1203 | 1.1214 | ▼ | 1.1157 | 1.1159 | -.0047 | Dec | 1.1217 | 1.1247 | ▼ | 1.1182 | 1.1185 | -.0047 | Currency Futures | Japanese Yen (CME)-¥12,500,000; $ per 100¥ | Oct | .6324 | .6328 | .6303 | .6306 | -.0018 | 813 | Dec | .6350 | .6358 | .6331 | .6334 | -.0019 | 370,226 | Canadian Dollar (CME)-CAD 100,000; $ per CAD | Oct | .7014 | .7015 | .7008 | .7003 | -.0010 | 415 | Dec | .7031 | .7045 | .7021 | .7022 | -.0010 | 370,160 | British Pound (CME)-£62,500; $ per £ | Oct | 1.3239 | 1.3260 | 1.3229 | 1.3206 | -.0035 | 455 | Dec | 1.3236 | 1.3265 | 1.3204 | 1.3208 | -.0035 | 261,000 | Swiss Franc (CME)-CHF 125,000; $ per CHF | Dec | 1.2128 | 1.2147 | 1.2066 | 1.2067 | -.0074 | 136,319 | March'27 | 1.2280 | 1.2280 | 1.2229 | 1.2203 | -.0074 | 421 | Australian Dollar (CME)-AUD 100,000; $ per AUD | Oct | .6975 | .6975 | .6958 | .6957 | -.0026 | 313 | Dec | .6974 | .6989 | .6948 | .6950 | -.0026 | 323,431 | Mexican Peso (CME)-MXN 500,000; $ per MXN | Oct | .05485 | .05485 | .05485 | .05474 | .00055 | 200 | Dec | .05404 | .05464 | .05383 | .05451 | .00054 | 283,075 | Index Futures | Mini DJ Industrial Average (CBT)-$5 x index | | Dec | 51972 | 52182 | 51913 | 52110 | 184 90,731 | March'27 | 52459 | 52648 | 52400 | 52589 | 187 148 | Mini S&P 500 (CME)-$50 x index | | Dec | 7873.00 | 7887.00 | 7846.25 | 7858.00 | -1.75 1,911,164 | March'27 | 7951.50 | 7964.25 | 7925.50 | 7936.75 | -1.75 13,724 | Mini S&P Midcap 400 (CME)-$100 x index | | Dec | 3691.40 | 3698.90 | 3671.60 | 3674.60 | -12.80 45,211 | March'27 | ... | ... | ... | 3702.90 | -15.40 n.a. | Mini Nasdaq 100 (CME)-$20 x index | | Dec | 31145.50 | 31289.25 | 30844.25 | 30898.25 | -210.50 279,610 | March'27 | 31500.00 | 31625.00 | 31201.50 | 31254.00 | -212.25 692 | Mini Russell 2000 (CME)-$50 x index | | Dec | 2822.90 | 2834.30 | 2810.40 | 2812.20 | -9.90 434,585 | March'27 | 2858.00 | 2858.00 | 2836.80 | 2837.20 | -10.10 1,519 | Mini Russell 1000 (CME)-$50 x index | Dec | 4273.50 | 4274.60 | 4266.40 | 4271.30 | -2.10 7,476 | U.S. Dollar Index (ICE-US)-$1,000 x index | | Dec | 102.04 | 102.40▲ | 101.90 | 102.38 | .35 52,136 | March'27 | 101.61 | 102.06▲ | 101.61 | 102.09 | .35 149 | Source: FactSet

---

Bonds | wsj.com/market-data/bonds/benchmarks

---

Tracking Bond Benchmarks

Return on investment and spreads over Treasurys and/or yields paid to investors compared with 52-week highs and lows for different types of bonds | Total return close | YTD total return (%) | Index | — Yield (%) — | Latest | Low | High | Broad Market Bloomberg Fixed Income Indices* | 2190.52 | -2.5 | U.S. Aggregate | 5.510 | 4.160 | 5.570 | U.S. Corporate Indexes Bloomberg Fixed Income Indices* | 3350.76 | -2.7 | U.S. Corporate | 5.990 | 4.680 | 6.050 | 3338.99 | -1.2 | Intermediate | 5.750 | 4.330 | 5.810 | 4181.33 | -5.9 | Long term | 6.560 | 5.370 | 6.630 | 618.48 | -4.1 | Double-A-rated | 5.840 | 4.410 | 5.900 | 921.50 | -2.2 | Triple-B-rated | 6.170 | 4.860 | 6.220 | High Yield Bonds ICE BofA | 619.23 | 0.3 | High Yield Constrained | 8.217 | 6.489 | 605.41 | -3.6 | Triple-C-rated | 16.676 | 11.651 | 16.676 | 4112.02 | -0.2 | High Yield 100 | 7.529 | 5.828 | 7.655 | 539.74 | 0.6 | Global High Yield Constrained | 7.926 | 6.317 | 393.73 | -0.4 | Europe High Yield Constrained | 6.572 | 4.820 | 6.629 | U.S Agency Bloomberg Fixed Income Indices* | 1940.03 | -0.9 | U.S Agency | 5.180 | 3.830 | 5.220 | 1728.31 | -0.4 | 10-20 years | 5.120 | 3.750 | 5.170 | 3479.02 | -6.2 | 20-plus years | 5.870 | 4.580 | 5.930 | 2901.81 | -1.8 | Yankee | 5.650 | 4.320 | 5.710 | Total return close | YTD total return (%) | Index | — Yield (%) — | Latest | Low | High | Mortgage-Backed Bloomberg Fixed Income Indices* | 2185.64 | -2.7 | Mortgage-Backed | 5.860 | 4.380 | 5.970 | 2146.83 | -2.5 | Ginnie Mae (GNMA) | 5.920 | 4.420 | 6.030 | 1291.29 | -2.7 | Fannie Mae (FNMA) | 5.840 | 4.370 | 5.950 | 1990.82 | -2.8 | Freddie Mac (FHLMC) | 5.660 | 4.160 | 5.810 | 596.83 | -3.4 | Muni Master | 4.391 | 3.037 | 4.628 | 425.43 | -3.8 | 7-12 year | 4.167 | 2.596 | 4.475 | 474.71 | -5.0 | 12-22 year | 5.033 | 3.608 | 5.157 | 444.54 | -4.8 | 22-plus year | 5.454 | 4.432 | 5.515 | 544.29 | -2.6 | Global Government | 4.654 | 3.500 | 4.694 | 841.08 | -0.1 | Canada | 3.848 | 3.070 | 3.963 | 354.85 | -2.8 | EMU$ | 4.164 | 3.117 | 4.230 | 627.14 | -4.7 | France | 4.787 | 3.350 | 4.823 | 457.18 | -1.5 | Germany | 3.554 | 2.650 | 3.684 | 242.44 | -4.3 | Japan | 3.253 | 2.120 | 3.327 | 498.66 | -1.6 | Netherlands | 3.660 | 2.860 | 3.778 | 800.06 | -2.6 | U.K. | 5.558 | 4.560 | 5.607 | n.a. | n.a. | Emerging Markets** | n.a. | 6.403 | 7.205 | \*Constrained indexes limit individual issuer concentrations to 2%; the High Yield 100 are the 100 largest bonds † In local currency § Euro-zone bonds

\*\*EMBI Global Index. \*\*\*Bloomberg yield data as of 10/09 Sources: ICE Data Services; Bloomberg Fixed Income Indices; J.P.Morgan

---

Global Government Bonds: Mapping Yields

Yields and spreads over or under U.S. Treasurys on benchmark two-year and 10-year government bonds in selected other countries; arrows indicate whether the yield rose(▲) or fell (▼) in the latest session | Coupon (%) | Country/Maturity, in years | Latest(●) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Previous | Month ago | Year ago | Spread Under/Over U.S. Treasurys, in basis points | Latest | Prev | Year ago | 4.750 | U.S. 2 | 4.789▲ | ● | 4.753 | 4.425 | 3.596 | 4.625 | 10 | 5.243▲ | ● | 5.232 | 4.836 | 4.146 | 2.250 | Australia 2 | 4.922▼ | ● | 4.927 | 5.016 | 3.548 | 12.5 | 13.0 | 4.250 | 10 | 5.330▼ | ● | 5.345 | 5.379 | 4.376 | 9.3 | 10.8 | 2.400 | France 2 | 3.658▲ | ● | 3.632 | 3.382 | 2.193 | -113 | -116.5 | 3.700 | 10 | 4.905▲ | ● | 4.867 | 4.451 | 3.474 | -33.2 | -37.0 | 3.000 | Germany 2 | 3.139▲ | ● | 3.116 | 3.210 | 1.960 | -165.8 | -168.1 | 3.000 | 10 | 3.488▼ | ● | 3.491 | 3.520 | 2.646 | -174.9 | -174.6 | 2.650 | Italy 2 | 3.471▲ | ● | 3.444 | 3.361 | 2.174 | -132 | -135.3 | 3.800 | 10 | 4.576▼ | ● | 4.584 | 4.354 | 3.455 | -66.1 | -65.4 | 2.000 | Japan 2 | 1.914 | ● | 1.914 | 1.839 | 0.925 | -288.3 | -288.3 | 3.100 | 10 | 3.016 | ● | 3.016 | 2.985 | 1.696 | -222.1 | -222.1 | 2.400 | Spain 2 | 3.270▼ | ● | 3.272 | 3.244 | 2.065 | -152.8 | -152.5 | 3.400 | 10 | 4.097▼ | ● | 4.112 | 3.979 | 3.141 | -114 | -112.5 | 4.375 | U.K. 2 | 4.774▲ | ● | 4.741 | 4.699 | 3.967 | -2.3 | -5.6 | 1.125 | 10 | 5.452▲ | ● | 5.444 | 5.278 | 4.674 | 21.5 | 20.7 | Source: Tullett Prebon, Tradeweb FTSE U.S. Treasury Close

---

Corporate Debt

Investment-grade spreads that tightened the most... | Issuer | Symbol | Coupon (%) | Yield (%) | Maturity | Spread , in basis points | Current | One-day change | Last week | Bank of America | ... | 6.000 | 6.00 | Oct. 15, '36 | 75 | -13 | 95 | Georgia Power | ... | 4.300 | 6.31 | March 15, '43 | 65 | -9 | 73 | Australia and New Zealand Banking | ... | 5.150 | 5.27 | Aug. 17, '29 | 35 | -6 | 37 | NatWest Markets | ... | 4.412 | 5.65 | Nov. 6, '30 | 62 | -5 | 60 | Hess | ... | 5.600 | 6.12 | Feb. 15, '41 | 88 | -4 | 96 | HSBC Holdings | HSBC | 6.500 | 6.42 | Sept. 15, '37 | 115 | -4 | 124 | Goldman Sachs | GS | 6.250 | 6.40 | Feb. 1, '41 | 114 | -3 | 120 | ING Bank* | ... | 4.711 | 5.58 | July 7, '31 | 55 | -3 | 60 | ...And spreads that widened the most | Verizon Communications | VZ | 4.500 | 6.04 | Aug. 10, '33 | 79 | 11 | 71 | Cooperatieve Rabobank | ... | 5.189 | 5.31 | Sept. 25, '29 | 39 | 9 | 31 | Toyota Motor Credit | ... | 5.050 | 5.24 | May 16, '29 | 31 | 9 | 36 | HSBC Holdings | HSBC | 4.950 | 5.49 | March 31, '30 | 47 | 7 | 50 | Comcast* | CMCSA | 4.250 | 6.12 | Jan. 15, '33 | 88 | 6 | 88 | UnitedHealth | UNH | 4.625 | 5.92 | July 15, '35 | 67 | 6 | n.a. | ConocoPhillips | COP | 6.500 | 6.06 | Feb. 1, '39 | 82 | 5 | 86 | John Deere Capital | ... | 4.400 | 5.19 | June 15, '29 | 25 | 4 | n.a. | High-yield issues with the biggest price increases... | Issuer | Symbol | Coupon (%) | Yield (%) | Maturity | Bond Price as % of face value | Current | One-day change | Last week | DISH DBS | ... | 5.125 | 9.04 | June 1, '29 | 91.000 | 0.75 | 90.813 | Navient* | NAVI | 5.625 | 9.21 | Aug. 1, '33 | 82.171 | 0.67 | 81.250 | Bath & Body Works | BBWI | 6.875 | 7.22 | Nov. 1, '35 | 97.750 | 0.57 | 96.362 | Rakuten Group | ... | 9.750 | 6.70 | April 15, '29 | 106.940 | 0.55 | 106.750 | Safeway | ... | 7.450 | 6.16 | Sept. 15, '27 | 101.135 | 0.42 | n.a. | Nissan Motor Acceptance | ... | 5.625 | 6.75 | Sept. 29, '28 | 97.960 | 0.17 | 98.125 | Telecom Italia Capital | ... | 7.721 | 6.90 | June 4, '38 | 106.528 | 0.12 | 107.107 | ...And with the biggest price decreases | Paramount Global | ... | 4.375 | 10.71 | March 15, '43 | 51.500 | -0.50 | 53.000 | Occidental Petroleum | OXY | 6.450 | 6.22 | Sept. 15, '36 | 101.692 | -0.31 | 101.743 | AAvantage Loyalty IP | ... | 5.750 | 6.13 | April 20, '29 | 99.125 | -0.05 | 98.969 | \*Estimated spread over 2-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year or 30-year hot-run Treasury; 100 basis points=one percentage pt.; change in spread shown is for Z-spread. Note: Data are for the most active issue of bonds with maturities of two years or more

Source: MarketAxess

Source: MarketAxess

---

Dividend Changes

KEY: A: annual; M: monthly; Q: quarterly; r: revised; SA: semiannual; S2:1: stock split and ratio; SO: spin-off. | Company | Symbol | Yld% | Amount New/Old | Frq | Payable/Record | Increased | Lockheed Martin | LMT | 2.7 | 3.60 / 3.45 | $\mathbf{Q}$ | Dec31/Dec01 | Stocks | Armlogi Holding | BTOC | 1:16 | /Oct15 | Biodexa Pharma ADR | BDRX | 1:8 | /Oct26 | SkinHealth Systems | SKIN | 1:20 | /Oct14 | Company | Symbol | Yld% | Amount New/Old | Frq | Payable/ Record | Foreign | Aon | AON | 1.2 | .82 | $\mathbf{q}$ | Nov13/Nov02 | Special | Apollo Commercial RE Fin | ARI | ... | 4.10 | Oct29/Oct20 | Note: Dividend yields as of 3:30 p.m. FT | 22000

July Aug. Sept. Oct. | Country/currency | Mon | US$vs.YTD chg(%) | in US$ | per US$ | Vietnam dong | .00003855 | 25937 | -1.4 | Europe | Czech Rep. koruna | .04577 | 21.849 | 6.2 | Denmark krone | .1492 | 6.7012 | 5.4 | Euro area euro | 1.1157 | .8963 | 5.3 | Hungary forint | .003058 | 327.02 | -0.1 | Iceland krona | .008191 | 122.09 | -2.6 | Norway krone | .1044 | 9.5772 | -5.0 | Poland zloty | .2544 | 3.9311 | 9.5 | Sweden krona | .0996 | 10.0396 | 9.0 | Switzerland franc | 1.1980 | .8347 | 5.3 | Turkey lira | .0203 | 49.3154 | 14.8 | Ukraine hryvnia | .0222 | 45.0500 | 6.4 | UK pound | 1.3209 | .7571 | 2.0 | Middle East/Africa | Bahrain dinar | 2.6484 | .3776 | 0.2 | Egypt pound | .0190 | 52.6491 | 10.4 | Israel shekel | .3251 | 3.0758 | -3.4 | Kuwait dinar | 3.2112 | .3114 | 1.2 | Oman sul rial | 2.5993 | .3847 | -0.01 | Qatar rial | .2735 | 3.657 | 0.1 | Saudi Arabia riyal | .2662 | 3.7563 | 0.1 | South Africa rand | .0605 | 16.5347 | -0.2 | Close Net Chg %Chg YTD %Chg | WSJ Dollar Index | 97.58 | 0.20 | 1.73 |

MARKETS DIGEST

---

Dow Jones Industrial Average | Last | Year ago | Trailing P/E ratio | 21.11 | 25.25 | P/E estimate* | 19.58 | 22.09 | Dividend yield | 1.54 | 1.61 | All-time high | 54349.12 | 08/05/26 | Current divisor 0.1682481652835

---

S&P 500 Index

---

EQUITIES | 49000 | July | Aug. | Sept. | Oct. | *Weekly P/E data based on as-reported earnings from Birinyi Associates Inc;†Based on Nasdaq-100 Index | Major U.S. Stock-Market Indexes

7807.24 ▼4.30, or 0.06%

High, low, open and close for each trading day of the past three months.

| Last | Year ago | Trailing P/E ratio * | 23.58 | 25.65 | P/E estimate * | 19.56 | 22.27 | Dividend yield * | 1.05 | 1.15 | All-time high | 7818.93, 10/06/26 | Dow Jones | Latest | 52-Week | % chg | High | Low | Close | Net chg | % chg | High | Low | % chg | YTD | 3-yr. ann. | Industrial Average | 51928.10 | 51718.60 | 51850.55 | 195.60 | 54349.12 | 45166.64 | 12.6 | 7.9 | 15.5 | Transportation Avg | 19848.24 | 19721.93 | 19759.08 | -45.06 | -0.23 | 23933.14 | 15239.93 | 29.7 | 13.8 | 9.7 | Utility Average | 1061.23 | 1051.37 | 1059.66 | 3.70 | 1190.23 | 1004.50 | -7.6 | -0.8 | 9.0 | Total Stock Market | 76974.93 | 76718.46 | 76807.07 | -94.68 | -0.12 | 77313.23 | 62750.36 | 16.6 | 13.8 | 21.1 | Barron's 400 | 1610.06 | 1605.49 | 1606.03 | -1.48 | -0.09 | 1685.46 | 1318.70 | 17.8 | 13.7 | 18.7 | Nasdaq Stock Market | Nasdaq Composite | 27376.66 | 27219.42 | 27245.90 | -120.27 | -0.44 | 27599.79 | 20794.64 | 20.1 | 17.2 | 26.1 | Nasdaq-100 | 30813.96 | 30618.64 | 30664.70 | -218.45 | -0.71 | 31224.47 | 22953.38 | 23.9 | 21.4 | 26.4 | S&P | 500 Index | 7821.67 | 7796.94 | 7807.24 | -4.30 | -0.06 | 7818.93 | 6343.72 | 17.3 | 14.0 | 21.5 | MidCap 400 | 3672.02 | 3654.18 | 3655.11 | -14.06 | -0.38 | 3926.98 | 3109.89 | 13.4 | 10.6 | 14.1 | SmallCap 600 | 1677.01 | 1669.76 | 1671.23 | -1.75 | -0.10 | 1828.54 | 1364.94 | 17.6 | 13.9 | 14.1 | Other Indexes | Russell 2000 | 2805.84 | 2794.47 | 2794.48 | -12.50 | -0.45 | 3068.42 | 2305.11 | 13.5 | 12.6 | NYSE Composite | 24019.18 | 23939.10 | 23990.73 | 51.63 | 0.22 | 24821.68 | 20912.89 | 12.2 | 9.0 | Value Line | 653.43 | 651.63 | 651.94 | -1.390 | -0.21 | 702.60 | 590.50 | 5.0 | 3.8 | NYSE Arca Biotech | 9277.61 | 9169.20 | 9184.30 | -51.94 | -0.56 | 9539.76 | 6388.50 | 43.8 | 28.4 | NYSE Arca Pharma | 1247.56 | 1240.23 | 1245.89 | 4.15 | 0.33 | 1315.38 | 984.85 | 24.2 | 10.6 | KBW Bank | 172.12 | 170.74 | 171.41 | 0.76 | 0.45 | 193.91 | 143.83 | 17.4 | 4.4 | PHLX$Gold/Silver | 365.49 | 362.48 | 364.26 | -2.43 | -0.66 | 470.37 | 265.03 | 17.7 | 6.4 | PHLX$Oil Service | 95.86 | 94.00 | 94.24 | -0.041 | -0.04 | 109.24 | 61.68 | 52.0 | 28.5 | PHLX$Semiconductor | 12378.31 | 12216.45 | 12236.79 | -335.63 | -2.67 | 14634.72 | 6352.07 | 82.0 | 72.8 | Cboe Volatility | 15.53 | 15.11 | 15.21 | 0.37 | 2.49 | 31.05 | 13.47 | -20.1 | 1.7 | Percentage Gainers...

Sources: FactSet; Dow Jones Market Data

Sources: FactSet; Dow Jones Market Data | Company | Symbol | Volume (000) | Last | Net chg | After Hours % chg | High | Low | Transocean | RIG | 12,880.7 | 5.62 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 5.62 | 5.58 | Nu Holdings CI A | NU | 7,352.7 | 15.98 | -0.03 | -0.18 | 16.10 | 15.90 | Comcast CI A | CMCSA | 5,496.9 | 20.69 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 20.75 | 20.62 | Indivior Pharmaceuticals | INDV | 5,401.8 | 36.06 | ... | unch. | 36.06 | 36.06 | Nokia ADR | NOK | 4,843.8 | 9.90 | ... | unch. | 9.92 | 9.61 | Snap | SNAP | 4,361.6 | 6.59 | 0.06 | 0.94 | 6.63 | 6.51 | Amazon.com | AMZN | 4,276.9 | 259.60 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 260.05 | 242.62 | Centuri Holdings | CTRI | 4,202.6 | 20.65 | ... | unch. | 20.65 | 20.25 | Percentage gainers... | Percentage gainers | Navitas Semiconductor | NVTS | 3,473.5 | 10.56 | 0.57 | 5.71 | 11.20 | 9.99 | Varonis Systems | VRNS | 101.3 | 48.88 | 2.51 | 5.40 | 48.88 | 46.37 | Aclaris Therapeutics | ACRS | 122.7 | 3.76 | 0.16 | 4.44 | 3.93 | 3.59 | Mirion Technologies | MIR | 94.6 | 16.97 | 0.72 | 4.43 | 16.97 | 16.24 | DHT Holdings | DHT | 130.4 | 26.90 | 0.68 | 2.59 | 26.90 | 26.22 | Most-active issues in late trading

Most-active and biggest movers among NYSE, NYSE Arca, NYSE Amer. and Nasdaq issues from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. ET as reported by electronic trading services, securities dealers and regional exchanges. Minimum share price of \$2 and minimum after-hours volume of 50,000 shares. | Syndax Pharmaceuticals | SNDX | 695.5 | 13.92 | -2.63 | -15.88 | 16.57 | 9.00 | Empery Digital | EMPD | 60.4 | 3.17 | -0.10 | -3.06 | 3.27 | 3.17 | Reddit | RDDT | 407.5 | 156.30 | -3.63 | -2.27 | 159.93 | 154.34 | Centene | CNC | 70.2 | 65.68 | -1.34 | -2.00 | 67.16 | 65.04 | Solaris Energy Infr | SEI | 608.3 | 77.70 | -1.58 | -1.99 | 79.45 | 77.70 | Percentage Losers | Asia-Pacific | MSCI AC Asia Pacific | 273.52 | -1.29 | -0.47 | 20.1 | Australia | S&P/ASX 200 | 8783.20 | 66.56 | 0.76 | 0.8 | China | Shanghai Composite | 3797.24 | -16.55 | -0.43 | -4.3 | Hong Kong | Hang Seng | 24271.20 | 59.85 | 0.25 | -5.3 | India | BSE Sensex | 71924.68 | -547.64 | -0.76 | -15.6 | Indonesia | JSX Composite | 5936.15 | -157.61 | -2.59 | -31.3 | Japan | NIKKEI 225 | 69030.92 | ... | Closed | 37.1 | Singapore | Straits Times | 5415.48 | 13.59 | 0.25 | 16.6 | South Korea | KOSPI | 6384.24 | -241.69 | -3.65 | 51.5 | Taiwan | TAIEX | 49301.96 | -11.48 | -0.02 | 70.2 | Thailand | SET | 1571.74 | -5.91 | -0.37 | 24.8 | \* Common stocks priced at \$2 a share or more with an average volume over 65 trading days of at least 5,000 shares †Has traded fewer than 65 days | Last | Year ago | Trailing P/E ratio *† | 31.51 | 33.55 | P/E estimate *† | 22.15 | 29.15 | Dividend yield *† | 0.53 | 0.64 | All-time high: 27599.79, 10/06/26 | 27245.90 ▼ 120.27, or 0.44%

High, low, open and close for each trading day of the past three months.

---

Late Trading

Volume Movers Ranked by change from 65-day average\* | Company | Symbol | Latest Session | 52-Week | Close | Net chg | % chg | High | Low | % chg | Bumble CI A | BMBL | 3.80 | 1.26 | 49.61 | 5.96 | 2.44 | -25.0 | WF Holding | WFF | 17.28 | 4.99 | 40.60 | 50.60 | 0.91 | 287.4 | Passage Bio | PASG | 4.55 | 0.86 | 23.31 | 20.00 | 3.29 | -46.3 | Gulf Resources | GURE | 3.32 | 0.59 | 21.61 | 11.83 | 2.04 | -39.4 | Tradr 2X Sh CBRS Daily | CBRZ | 14.32 | 2.52 | 21.36 | 37.43 | 5.68 | ... | Gix Internet | GIXI | 4.72 | 0.83 | 21.34 | 15.50 | 3.56 | ... | Picard Medical | PMI | 11.34 | 1.86 | 19.62 | 684.00 | 2.65 | -97.6 | Tradr 2X Sh LITE Daily | LITZ | 21.28 | 3.44 | 19.28 | 121.36 | 16.35 | ... | Defiance Tgt 2x Shrt IONQ | IONZ | 28.62 | 4.61 | 19.20 | 436.81 | 17.07 | -86.0 | Tradr 2X Sh AXTI Daily | AXTQ | 33.89 | 5.33 | 18.66 | 67.92 | 17.90 | ... | XIAO-I ADR | AIXI | 2.40 | 0.37 | 18.23 | 379.40 | 1.18 | -98.4 | Bitwise NEAR ETF | NRR | 28.59 | 4.25 | 17.46 | 29.64 | 22.55 | ... | American Realty Investors | ARL | 19.25 | 2.80 | 17.02 | 24.44 | 12.42 | 26.5 | Tradr 2X Sh AAOI Daily | AAOZ | 11.87 | 1.68 | 16.49 | 51.05 | 6.94 | ... | Greenland Mines | GRML | 6.02 | 0.85 | 16.44 | 36.99 | 2.82 | -79.4 | International Stock Indexes | Region/Country Index | Close | Latest | YTD %chg | Net chg | % chg | World | MSCI ACWI | 1146.50 | -0.76 | -0.07 | 13.0 | MSCI ACWI ex-USA | 468.23 | -0.32 | -0.07 | 11.2 | MSCI World | 4963.27 | 0.86 | 0.02 | 12.0 | MSCI Emerging Markets | 1697.03 | -11.74 | -0.69 | 20.8 | Americas | MSCI AC Americas | 2953.27 | -1.686 | -0.06 | 13.9 | Canada | S&P/TSX Comp | 35664.62 | ... | Closed | 12.5 | Latin Amer. | MSCI EM Latin America | 3384.14 | 11.22 | 0.33 | 24.9 | Brazil | Bovespa | 209066.90 | ... | Closed | 29.8 | Mexico | S&P/BMV IPC | 66746.78 | 698.21 | 1.06 | 3.8 | EMEA | STOXX Europe 600 | 635.65 | 4.10 | 0.65 | 7.3 | Eurozone | Euro STOXX | 653.31 | 3.34 | 0.51 | 6.7 | Belgium | Bel-20 | 5490.22 | 35.48 | 0.65 | 8.1 | Denmark | OMX Copenhagen 20 | 1527.08 | 8.90 | 0.59 | -5.0 | France | CAC 40 | 7832.88 | 29.55 | 0.38 | -3.9 | Germany | DAX | 25277.68 | 190.41 | 0.76 | 3.2 | Israel | Tel Aviv | 4062.11 | 0.40 | 0.01 | 11.9 | Italy | FTSE MIB | 50035.00 | 288.69 | 0.58 | 11.3 | Netherlands | AEX | 1135.49 | 4.54 | 0.40 | 19.4 | Norway | Oslo Bors All-Share | 2485.95 | 5.47 | 0.22 | 28.0 | South Africa | FTSE/JSE All-Share | 108759.84 | 235.07 | 0.22 | -6.1 | Spain | IBEX 35 | 19285.80 | 252.70 | 1.33 | 11.4 | Sweden | OMX Stockholm | 1124.99 | 2.88 | 0.26 | 7.6 | Switzerland | Swiss Market | 13877.84 | 90.44 | 0.66 | 4.6 | Turkey | BIST 100 | 12150.67 | -115.31 | -0.94 | 7.9 | U.K. | FTSE 100 | 10656.28 | 104.23 | 0.99 | 7.3 | U.K. | FTSE 250 | 24328.06 | 114.28 | 0.47 | 8.3 | Company | Symbol | Volume (000) | % chg from 65-day avg | -Latest Session | 52-Week | Close | % chg | High | Low | iSh Curr Hd MSCI Eurozone | HEZU | 2,551 | 3516 | 47.95 | -0.21 | 51.68 | 41.68 | KPET Ultra Paceline | KPET | 250 | 2523 | 9.99 | -0.30 | 10.21 | 9.91 | Cantor Equity Partners VI | CEPS | 203 | 1991 | 10.20 | -0.39 | 10.45 | 10.05 | Range Capital Acqn II | RNGT | 214 | 1912 | 10.20 | 0.10 | 10.20 | 9.90 | ProShares UltShort Euro | EUO | 315 | 1756 | 32.65 | 0.94 | 32.65 | 26.93 | AllianzIM US Eq Bf10 Jan | JANT | 83 | 1556 | 45.75 | 0.01 | 45.77 | 39.23 | Contineum Therapeutics | CTNM | 8,444 | 1516 | 8.57 | -35.99 | 17.79 | 8.43 | Drugs Made In America II | DMII | 859 | 1210 | 10.19 | ... | 10.33 | 9.86 | MiniMed Group | MMED | 38,550 | 1153 | 18.80 | -4.62 | 24.43 | 10.65 | Innov Grw100 Pwr Bf Mar | NMAR | 264 | 1147 | 33.32 | -0.06 | 33.41 | 26.78 | ---

Nasdaq Composite Index | Company | Symbol | Latest Session | 52-Week | Close | Net chg | % chg | High | Low | % chg | Able View Global | ABLV | 1.33 | -1.06 | -44.35 | 2.86 | 0.54 | 44.4 | Vivakor | VIVK | 2.17 | -1.63 | -42.89 | 35760.00 | 2.14 | -100.0 | Contineum Therapeutics | CTNM | 8.57 | -4.82 | -35.99 | 17.79 | 8.43 | -27.9 | Quetta Acquisition | QETA | 11.60 | -4.81 | -29.31 | 21.59 | 11.02 | 3.8 | CID HoldCo | DAIC | 1.70 | -0.69 | -28.87 | 76.25 | 0.37 | -97.5 | AI OKTO | AIOK | 6.20 | -2.50 | -28.73 | 10.95 | 5.78 | ... | Bradbury Capital | BBCI | 5.05 | -1.86 | -26.92 | 15.50 | 4.90 | -58.2 | Masonrylory | MSGY | 2.70 | -0.93 | -25.62 | 52.80 | 1.73 | -78.9 | Niki BioSolutions | NIKI | 3.02 | -0.98 | -24.50 | 24.00 | 3.02 | -81.8 | PS International Group | PSIG | 3.87 | -1.23 | -24.12 | 12.00 | 1.03 | 5.6 | Medicus Pharma | MDCX | 3.58 | -1.03 | -22.26 | 139.00 | 3.58 | -97.1 | CervoMed | CRVO | 2.51 | -0.71 | -22.05 | 10.00 | 2.13 | -69.2 | Valion Bio | VBIO | 1.68 | -0.46 | -21.50 | 76.50 | 1.59 | -97.7 | VisionWave Holdings | VWAV | 4.52 | -1.22 | -21.25 | 316.00 | 3.90 | -97.7 | Leverage 2X Lg CBRS Dly | CBRG | 1.78 | -0.48 | -21.11 | 17.15 | 1.75 | ... | Commodities

CURRENCIES & COMMODITIES

Trading Diary | Volume, Advancers, Decliners | NYSE | NYSE Amer. | Total volume*1 | 1,023,080,952 | 13,880,554 | Adv. volume* | 547,940,346 | 2,491,996 | Decl. volume* | 458,089,813 | 11,280,276 | Issues traded | 2,796 | 290 | Advances | 1,290 | 84 | Declines | 1,434 | 194 | Unchanged | 72 | 12 | New highs | 53 | 2 | New lows | 166 | 31 | Closing Arms† | 0.88 | 1.40 | Block trades* | 3,502 | 158 | Nasdaq | NYSE Arca | Adv. volume* | 2,958,768,887 | 106,897,087 | Decl. volume* | 3,698,558,459 | 106,503,183 | Issues traded | 4,959 | 2,538 | Advances | 1,854 | 1,102 | Declines | 2,939 | 1,363 | Unchanged | 166 | 73 | New highs | 102 | 65 | New lows | 402 | 45 | Closing Arms† | 0.92 | 0.72 | Block trades* | 30,605 | 1,084 | Most Active Stocks

Currencies

U.S.-dollar foreign-exchange rates at 5 p.m. ET

Total volume\*6,285,178,821 220,194,978

Adv. volume\*2,536,988,687 106,639,067

Decl. volume\*3,698,558,459 106,503,183

\* Primary market NYSE, NYSE American NYSE Arca only.

†(TRIN) A comparison of the number of advancing and declining issues with the volume of shares rising and falling. An Arms of less than 1 indicates buying demand; above 1 indicates selling pressure. | Country/currency | Mon | US$vs.YTD chg(%) | in US$ | per US$ | Americas | Argentina peso | .00071516.7423 | 4.5 | Brazil real | .2005 | 4.9875 | -9.6 | Canada dollar | .7001 | 1.4284 | 4.1 | Chile peso | .001024 | 976.87 | 8.5 | Colombia peso | .000313 | 3195.84 | -15.2 | Ecuador US dollar | 1 | 1 | unch | Mexico peso | .0548 | 18.2640 | 1.4 | Uruguay peso | .02485 | 40.2389 | 3.0 | Australia dollar | .6960 | 1.4368 | -4.1 | China yuan | .1494 | 6.6921 | -4.3 | Hong Kong dollar | .1274 | 7.8482 | 0.8 | India rupee | .01045 | 95.658 | 6.4 | Indonesia rupiah | .0000557 | 17954 | 7.5 | Japan yen | .006304 | 158.63 | 1.3 | Kazakhstan tenge | .002217 | 451.05 | -11.1 | Macau pataca | .1237 | 8.0857 | 0.8 | Malaysia ringgit | .2448 | 4.0852 | 0.7 | New Zealand dollar | .5588 | 1.7895 | 3.0 | Pakistan rupee | .00361 | 276.994 | -1.2 | Philippines peso | .0159 | 62.768 | 6.5 | Singapore dollar | .7809 | 1.2806 | -0.4 | South Korea won | .0007494 | 1334.45 | -7.4 | Sri Lanka rupee | .0030199 | 331.14 | 6.9 | Taiwan dollar | .03130 | 31.948 | 1.9 | Thailand baht | .02974 | 33.620 | 6.7 | Commodities | | Close | Monday | 52-Week | YTD | Net chg | % Chg | High | Low | % Chg | % chg | DJ Commodity | 1469.55 | 5.76 | 0.39 | 1505.40 | 1085.89 | 34.52 | 29.97 | FTSE/CC CRB Index | 417.10 | 2.37 | 0.57 | 429.15 | 291.69 | 41.13 | 39.60 | Crude oil, $ per barrel | 93.74 | 1.89 | 2.06 | 112.95 | 55.27 | 57.57 | 63.25 | Natural gas, $/MMBtu | 3.167 | -0.053 | -1.65 | 7.460 | 2.523 | 1.57 | -14.08 | Gold, $ per troy oz. | 4165.80 | -25.20 | -0.60 | 5318.40 | 3947.70 | 1.39 | -3.69 | ---

Polymarket | A Dow Jones partner

Prediction Market: How many Fed rate hikes in 2026? This market will resolve according to the exact amount of hikes of 25 basis points in 2026 by the Fed (including any hikes made during the December meeting). | Close | Net Chg | % Chg | YTD % Chg | WSJ Dollar Index | 97.58 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 1.73 | Sources: Tullett Prebon, Dow Jones Market Data

| Company | Symbol | Volume(000) | % chg from65-day avg | Latest Session | 52-Week | Close | % chg | High | Low | Mobile-health Netwk Solns | MNDR | 190,893 | 81406.8 | 3.04 | 257.65 | 32.52 | 0.76 | Linkers Industries | LNKS | 147,962 | 44875.8 | 2.27 | 138.37 | 420.00 | 0.76 | Freight Technologies | FRGT | 99,668 | 981.3 | 0.35 | 19.17 | 51.25 | 0.21 | OLB Group | OLB | 95,432 | 248.6 | 0.65 | 32.16 | 1.80 | 0.18 | VCI Global | VCIG | 93,004 | 6222.5 | 0.44 | -13.64 | 4140.00 | 0.36 | J-Star Holding | YMAT | 84,712 | 4629.4 | 2.91 | 125.58 | 13.00 | 0.85 | China SXT Pharm | SXTC | 75,046 | 1058.1 | 0.10 | -31.41 | 83758.79 | 0.09 | Ondas | ONDS | 74,089 | -5.4 | 6.67 | -0.89 | 15.28 | 4.95 | Intel | INTC | 72,363 | -32.1 | 101.35 | -3.20 | 142.35 | 32.89 | Euro Tech Holdings | CLWT | 70,630 | 289237.8 | 2.15 | 58.09 | 2.68 | 0.99 | \* Volumes of 100,000 shares or more are rounded to the nearest thousand

---

CREDIT MARKETS

---

Consumer Rates and Returns to Investor U.S. consumer rates Selected rates

A consumer rate against its benchmark over the past year

-2.00

ON D J F M A M J J A S O

2025 2026 | Bankrate.com avg1: | 1.79% | Bread Savings | 4.50% | Draper, UT | 833-755-4354 | BTG Pactual Bank | 4.55% | New York, NY | 212-652-7200 | Bread Savings | 4.60% | Draper, UT | 833-755-4354 | Barclays Bank | 4.75% | Wilmington, DE | 888-710-8756 | Popular Direct | 5.00% | Miami Lakes, FL | 800-274-5696 | Interest rate | —Yield/Rate (%) — | 52-Week Range (%) — | 3-yr chg(pct pts) | Last (●) | Week ago | Low | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | Federal-funds rate target | 3.75-4.00 | 3.75-4.00 | 3.50 | 4.25 | -1.50 | Prime rate* | 7.00 | 7.00 | 6.75 | 7.25 | -1.50 | SOFR | 3.87 | 3.88 | 3.50 | 4.31 | -1.44 | Money market, annual yield | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.45 | -0.17 | Five-year CD, annual yield | 1.79 | 1.78 | 1.67 | 1.79 | -1.04 | 30-year mortgage, fixed† | 7.49 | 7.45 | 6.11 | 7.50 | -0.59 | 15-year mortgage, fixed† | 6.93 | 6.85 | 5.55 | 6.93 | -0.27 | Jumbo mortgages, $832,750-plus† | 7.53 | 7.46 | 6.34 | 7.53 | -0.63 | Five-year adj mortgage (ARM)† | 6.39 | 6.66 | 5.66 | 6.72 | -0.40 | New-car loan, 48-month | 7.04 | 6.94 | 6.85 | 7.13 | -0.44 | Sources: FactSet; Dow Jones Market Data; Bankrate.com

---

Treasury yield curve

Treasury yield curve

Yield to maturity of current bills,

notes and bonds

month(s) years

—— maturity

Forex Race

Yen, euro vs. dollar; dollar vs. major U.S. trading partners

Sources: Tradeweb FTSE U.S. Treasury Close; Tullett Prebon; Dow Jones Market Data

Corporate Borrowing Rates and Yields | Bond total return index | Close | Yield (%) | 52-Week | Total Return (%) | Last | Week ago | High | Low | 52-wk | 3-yr | U.S. Treasury Bloomberg* | 2275.650 | 5.080 | 5.130 | 5.130 | 3.750 | -2.190 | 3.500 | U.S. Treasury Long Bloomberg* | 2975.810 | 5.620 | 5.690 | 5.690 | 4.520 | -8.644 | 1.930 | Aggregate, Bloomberg* | 2190.520 | 5.510 | 5.570 | 5.570 | 4.160 | -1.976 | 4.454 | Fixed-Rate MBS, Bloomberg* | 2185.640 | 5.860 | 5.970 | 5.970 | 4.380 | -1.651 | 5.087 | High Yield 100, ICE BofA | 4112.019 | 7.529 | 7.569 | 7.655 | 5.828 | 1.411 | 7.891 | Muni Master, ICE BofA | 596.828 | 4.391 | 4.418 | 4.628 | 3.037 | -2.502 | 2.646 | EMBI Global, J.P. Morgan | n.a. | n.a. | 7.205 | 7.205 | 6.403 | n.a. | n.a. | \*Bloomberg yield data as of 10/09

Sources: J.P. Morgan; Bloomberg Fixed Income Indices; ICE Data Services

Adnoc Logistics Looks to Buy HEA Stake

BY BEN DUMMETT

The logistics arm of United Arab Emirates's oil-and-gas giant Adnoc is in talks to acquire a big stake in HEA Energy, a deal that would value the Middle Eastern-based energy marine services company at up to \$3 billion, according to people familiar with the matter.

The talks involve Adnoc Logistics & Services, a unit of Abu Dhabi National Oil, taking either a large minority or controlling stake in HEA, the people said.

The discussions are advancing but could still fail to turn into a deal, the people familiar said.

The state-backed energy logistics provider is flush with cash. Charter rates in its shipping business surged this year when conflict in Iran bottled up the Persian Gulf and made it costlier to get oil out of the region. Adnoc L&S quadrupled its net profit in the second quarter to \$917 million from the same period a year earlier.

Adnoc is seeking to boost oil and gas production after the

U.A.E. broke away earlier this year from OPEC, the price-setting oil cartel. That move gives state-owned Adnoc more freedom to make investments to boost output and establish itself more prominently as an energy superpower. In August, Adnoc's gas-production business said it would invest more than \$8 billion to increase capacity.

Adnoc L&S supports offshore drilling projects and operates more than 100 ships used to transport crude oil, liquefied natural gas and refined prod-

ucts globally.

An ownership stake in closely held HEA would bolster the U.A.E.'s footprint in offshore oil and gas services, extending Adnoc L&S's reach geographically including in the North Sea and the U.S.

Founded in 2022, HEA is based in Abu Dhabi. It operates a network of so-called jack-up barges—floating platforms used to support offshore wind farms and oil-and-gas maintenance activity.

HEA also provides accommodation vessels to house oil and gas workers, and battery-powered subsea vessels.

HEA generated operating income of \$65.2 million in the first six months of the year, up 128% from the year-ago period, while revenue more than doubled to about \$100 million, according to the company's website

The U.A.E. has been aggressive in shipping oil out of the Persian Gulf despite Iran's drone and missile attacks. Adnoc has provided “shuttle run”

services, ferrying oil in tankers from inside the Gulf to just outside the Strait of Hormuz, where it is delivered to customers.

Adnoc L&S expanded its ability to ship energy when in August it said it acquired 11 vessels—five to carry gas and six to transport crude oil—for a total of about \$1.3 billion. Publicly traded in Abu Dhabi, Adnoc L&S has a market value of more than \$15 billion. It is about 80% owned by Adnoc, its state-owned parent.

New Highs and Lows | Continued From Page B6 | 52-Wk % | 52-Wk % | | 52-Wk % | Stock | Sym | Hi/Lo Chg | Stock | Sym | Hi/Lo Chg | Stock | Sym | Hi/Lo | Chg | Momentus | MNTS | 3.05 -4.3 | NewHoriz AircraftWt | HOVRW | 0.23 -8.5 | MoolecScience | MLEC | 1.69 -18.2 | NewMtrFin | NMFC | 6.67 -0.1 | MkdwellTech | MKDW | 0.91 | -9.5 | MorganStanleyPfdI | MsPl | 23.1 -24.2 | NewGenlvy | NVVI | 0.21 -8.1 | MalibuBoats | MBUU | 21.22 | -0.3 | MorganStanleyPfdI | MsPI | 17.08 -1.3 | NewMunorWt | NWVW | -0.45 -1.5 | MapLightTherap | MLPT | 8.48 | -2.6 | MorganStanleyPfdO | MsPo | 14.85 -1.2 | Newmark | NMRK | 11.55 -3.1 | Maris-Tech | MTEK | 0.55 | -3.3 | MorganStanleyPfdP | MsPP | 22.71 -0.8 | NexalinTechnology | NXL | 3.32 -7.4 | MatthewsIntl | MATW | 18.45 | 0.2 | MS Direct Lend | MSDL | 13.21 -1.0 | NexentisTech | NXTS | 0.73 -11.9 | MedicalProp | MPT | 3.05 | ... | Mosaic | MOS | 18.41 0.6 | NexusAdvTech | NXAT | 0.50 -14.8 | MediqPharma | MDXC | -3.58 -2.8 | ... | MySize | MYSZ | 1.19 -1.6 | NiagenBio | NAGE | 2.60 -2.2 | MediWound | MDWD | 12.35 | 0.2 | NACCO Inds | NC | 35.01 -1.6 | NikiBioSolutions | NIKO | 3.02 -24.5 | MeiwuTechnology | WNW | 2.03 -3.7 | ... | NetPower | NWPW | 1.23 -2.1 | NiogenCorDevs | NIG | 3.25 -2.7 | MercerIntl | MERC | 0.19 -18.4 | ... | NanoNuclearEner | NNE | 14.23 -6.8 | NiobondPolyWt | NiOBW | 0.52 -12.9 | MeritageHomes | MTH | 57.63 | -1.6 | NanoXImaging | NOXX | 0.50 -5.2 | Nixxy | NIXX | 0.27 -3.7 | Merlin | MRLN | 1.19 -4.0 | ... | NatiRurUTIN20G4 | NRUC | 19.67 -1.0 | NoahHoldings | NOAH | 7.46 -0.4 | MeshflowAcqnWt | MESHW | 0.18 -14.1 | ... | NauticusRobot | KITT | 1.34 -8.1 | NorthAmConstr | NOA | 11.66 -0.6 | MetalsRoyalty | TMCR | 2.77 -4.4 | ... | NeighborhoodIntel | NXH | 1.58 -4.1 | NorthernDynasty | NAK | 1.05 -5.4 | MicroAlgo | MLGO | 2.88 -3.7 | ... | NeostellarCap | NSLR | 7.04 -2.9 | NorthStarEarth&Spec | NSTLWS | 0.09 -6.0 | MicroBotMed | MBDT | 1.03 -2.8 | ... | NerdyA | NRDY | 6.19 -5.3 | NorthStarEarth&Spec | NSTR | 2.49 -0.5 | MicroCloudHologram | HOLO | 1.37 -2.1 | ... | NetClassTechnology | NTCL | 0.96 -2.7 | NouveauMonde | NMRO | 1.00 -1.9 | MicropolisAI | MCRP | 0.36 -13.2 | ... | NeumoraTherap | NMRA | 0.44 -8.1 | NuScalePower | SMR | 6.61 -6.9 | Microvast | MVST | 0.54 | -4.9 | NeuroSense | NRSN | 3.28 -4.9 | OFA Group | OFAL | 0.37 -30.4 | MicroVision | MVIS | 1.15 | ... | NeuroSenseWt | NRSNW | 0.01 -29.9 | ONENuclearEnergy | ONEN | 1.53 -1.8 | MixedMartialArts | MMA | 0.30 -11.9 | ... | NewAmerican | NWAXU | 10.16 -0.2 | OceanPwrTech | OPTT | 0.62 -17.9 | Mobilicom | MOB | 3.89 -1.3 | ... | NewFortressEnergy | NFE | 4.01 -3.0 | OceanFirstFin | OCFC | 15.98 0.3 | ---

Mutual Funds

Data provided by LSEG

Top 250 mutual-funds listings for Nasdaq-published share classes by net assets. e-Ex-distribution. f-Previous day's quotation. g-Footnotes x and s apply. j-Footnotes e and s apply. k-Recalculated by LSEG, using updated data. p-Distribution costs apply, 12b-1. r-Redemption charge may apply. s-Sock split or dividend. t-Footnotes p and r apply. v-Footnotes x and e apply. x-Ex-dividend. z-Footnote x, e and s apply. NA-Not available due to incomplete price, performance or cost data. NE-Not released by LSEG; data under review. NN-Fund not tracked. NS-Fund didn't exist at start of period. | Fund | NAV | Net Chg | YTD %Ret | AB Funds | MunilncmShares | 10.36 | ... | -3.5 | American Century Inv | Ultra | 102.70 | -0.76 | 9.1 | American Funds CI A | AmcpA | 45.93 | -0.18 | 7.6 | AMutlA | 64.53 | +0.21 | 9.6 | BalA | 40.24 | -0.01 | 8.2 | BondA | 10.76 | -0.01 | -2.9 | CaplBA | 81.70 | +0.23 | 8.1 | CapWGra | 81.38 | -0.08 | 14.9 | EupacA | 62.39 | -0.02 | 9.1 | FdlnVa | 103.49 | -0.18 | 14.9 | GwthA | 89.94 | -0.41 | 11.8 | ICAA | 69.11 | -0.14 | 11.4 | IncoA | 27.33 | +0.10 | 6.6 | N PerA | 75.75 | -0.02 | 7.3 | NEcoA | 86.61 | -0.56 | 19.2 | NwWrldA | 106.84 | -0.09 | 14.5 | SmCpA | 81.23 | -0.56 | 10.8 | WshA | 67.68 | +0.26 | 8.9 | Monday, October 12, 2026 | Monday, October 12, 2026 | Fund | NAV | Net Chg %Ret | Artisan Funds | IntVal Inst | 58.37 | +0.07 | 9.9 | Baird Funds | AggBdlnst | 9.42 | ... | -2.3 | CorBdlnst | 9.78 | ... | -2.1 | IntBdlnst | 10.14 | ... | -1.1 | ShtTBDInst | 9.38 | ... | 1.0 | BlackRock Funds | HiYBlk | 6.92 | ... | 0.8 | HiYtBd Inst | 6.92 | ... | 0.9 | BlackRock Funds III | iHS&P500ldxK907.43-0.43 15.0 | BlackRock Funds Inst | StratIncOpptyIns | 9.48 | ... | 0.7 | Calamos Funds | MktNeutl | 16.29 | +0.01 | 4.6 | CausewayInst | CausewayInst | 24.02 | +0.10 | 2.2 | Columbia Class A | SelgComulnfaA251.60-4.88 60.6 | Columbia Class I | DivlIncm I | 40.46 | +0.21 | 12.9 | Fund | NAV | Net Chg | YTD %Ret | Dimensional Fds | EmgMktVa | 44.95 | -0.13 | 23.3 | EmMktCorEq | 34.09 | -0.27 | 19.3 | IntlCoreEq | NA | ... | NA | IntlVal | 31.80 | +0.01 | 13.5 | IntSmCo | 27.32 | -0.08 | 8.9 | IntSmVa | 34.13 | -0.15 | 12.7 | LgCo | 51.82 | -0.03 | 15.1 | US CoreEq1 | 56.52 | +0.01 | 14.8 | US CoreEq2 | 50.32 | ... | 14.6 | US Small | 59.00 | -0.12 | 13.7 | US SmCpVal | 59.65 | +0.08 | 16.8 | US TgdVal | 42.01 | +0.09 | 14.8 | USLgVa | 66.95 | +0.21 | 20.4 | Dodge & Cox | Balanced | 13.70 | +0.04 | 4.0 | Income | 12.07 | +0.01 | -2.9 | Intl Stk | 18.08 | ... | 9.8 | Stock | 17.59 | +0.09 | 8.0 | DoubleLine Funds | TotRetBdl | 8.38 | +0.01 | NA | Fund | NAV | Net Chg | YTD %Ret | Fund | NAV | Net Chg | YTD %Ret | Fidelity | Fidelity Invest | 500ldxInstPrem271.32 | -0.15 | 15.1 | Balanc | 32.68 | -0.03 | 11.9 | Contrafund K6 | 38.96 | -0.11 | 14.5 | BluCh | 298.69 | -2.38 | 19.8 | EmgMktldxInstPrem | 16.69 | -0.24 | 22.0 | BluChGr K6 | 49.40 | -0.46 | 18.1 | ExtMktldxInstPre113.13 | -0.78 | 12.4 | Contra | 27.97 | -0.06 | 15.3 | FidSAIEmerg | 21.73 | -0.25 | 29.0 | ContraK | 28.11 | -0.06 | 15.3 | FidSer5 | 7.08 | ... | -4.1 | Cplnc | 11.14 | -0.03 | 6.7 | FidSerInt | 8.22 | ... | -1.2 | GroCo | 61.12 | -0.55 | 27.8 | FidSerToMarket | 25.44 | -0.03 | 14.8 | InvGrBd | 9.62 | ... | -2.4 | FIDZroLgCplx | 28.01 | -0.02 | 14.8 | LowP | 41.54 | +0.05 | 11.2 | GlexUSIdxInstPrem | 21.11 | -0.13 | 13.1 | Magin | 15.68 | -0.07 | 10.7 | GrowthCompanyK6 | 47.67 | -0.45 | 28.8 | NASDAQ | 347.16 | -1.53 | 17.7 | IntldxInstPrem | 66.34 | -0.11 | 9.1 | OTC | 27.99 | -0.22 | 33.4 | IntlIndex | 16.77 | -0.11 | 13.8 | Puritn | 25.75 | -0.04 | 10.8 | LgCpGwld InstPre | 49.88 | -0.33 | 7.9 | SAILTTreBdlxd | 6.03 | +0.01 | -7.3 | LgCpVldxInstPrem | 25.34 | +0.10 | 22.4 | SAIUSMinVolIndFd | 25.31 | +0.15 | 11.0 | MidCplxInstPrem | 42.39 | -0.13 | 14.8 | SAIUSQtyldx | 25.77 | +0.06 | 14.1 | SAIUSLgCplxIndFd | 29.11 | -0.01 | 15.1 | SrsBIChGroRetail | 25.55 | -0.20 | 21.1 | SeriesBondFxd | 8.64 | ... | -2.4 | SrsEmrgMkt | 31.15 | -0.43 | 26.4 | SeriesOverseas | 15.42 | -0.05 | 3.3 | SrsGlobal | 20.70 | -0.13 | 13.1 | SerLTTreBdlxd | 4.87 | +0.01 | -6.7 | SrsGroCoRetail | 35.12 | -0.32 | 28.8 | SmCplxInstPrem | 35.12 | -0.15 | 13.7 | SrsIntlGrw | 20.34 | -0.15 | 6.4 | TMktldxInstPrem214.32 | -0.27 | 14.8 | SrsIntlVal | 16.50 | +0.01 | 5.8 | TotalMarketIndex | 27.15 | -0.03 | 14.8 | TotalBond | 9.12 | ... | -2.5 | TtlIntldxInstPr | 19.53 | -0.12 | 12.8 | Fidelity SAI | USBdlxInstPrem | 10.01 | ... | -2.3 | FidSalCndlnxFnd | 15.68 | -0.02 | 10.1 | Fidelity Advisor I | FidSalInfltnfnd | 9.68 | +0.01 | -1.6 | GrOppl | 271.75 | -3.19 | 16.2 | IntValldxd | 14.31 | -0.01 | 13.7 | Fidelity Freedom | TotalBd | 8.63 | ... | -2.5 | Idx203InsPre | 24.03 | -0.04 | 6.7 | Fidelity Selects | Idx203InsPre | 28.64 | -0.06 | 8.0 | Semiconductors r | 62.78 | -1.63 | 58.3 | Idx2040InsPre | 31.75 | -0.07 | 10.5 | Tech | 58.12 | -0.53 | 45.1 | Idx2045InsPre | 34.53 | -0.09 | 12.2 | Fidelity Strategic A | Idx2050InsPre | 34.74 | -0.10 | 12.5 | StratAeEmrMrt | NA | ... | NA | 2-Wk % | 52-Wk % | Hi/Lo Chg | Stock | Sym | Hi/Lo Chg | 1.26 | -1.9 | RealREMAX | REAX | 14.02 - 10.0 | 1.88 | -3.4 | ReconTech | RCON | 0.90 - 9.0 | 0.96 | 1.1 | RedCat | RCAT | 5.38 - 6.6 | 15.86 | -8.6 | RedCloud | RCT | 0.12 - 3.5 | 4.54 | -12.6 | RedwoodTrust | RWT | 2.02 - 3.5 | 0.61 | -7.9 | RedwoodPfdA | RWTPA | 16.66 - 6.9 | 0.21 | -6.3 | RedwoodNts30 | RWTP | 20.44 - 3.2 | 0.83 | -3.5 | RedwoodNts31 | RWTS | 19.70 - 2.0 | 2.30 | -11.0 | ReinsuranceGrpDeb | RZC | 24.83 - 0.4 | 1.25 | -8.5 | ResideoTech | REZI | 16.62 - 2.6 | 0.43 | -9.4 | ResolutionMinerals | RML | 5.20 - 1.3 | 1.66 | 0.6 | ResourcesConnect | RGP | 2.71 - 0.7 | 1.75 | -1.6 | TeleSocolutions | ETSO | 1.80 - 1.0 | 3.98 | -8.8 | RezolveAI | RZLV | 1.73 - 8.4 | 3.59 | -8.2 | RichSparkle | ANPA | 1.80 - 5.7 | 12.03 | -6.0 | RegittelliCompWt | RGTIW | 3.91 - 15.7 | 10.39 | -1.6 | RocketCos. | RKT | 10.78 - 5.3 | 34.27 | -2.0 | RozeAI | RZAI | 9.83 - 1.8 | 5.86 | -4.5 | Rubico | RUBI | 0.41 - 16.8 | 39.15 | -4.3 | SOS | SOS | 0.25 - 12.9 | 4.26 | -6.8 | SS Innovations | SSII | 2.50 - 3.6 | 1.22 | -1.8 | SENEP | SENEP | 1.78 - 8.8 | 15.02 | -0.9 | SanaBiotech | SANA | 2.59 - 6.1 | 0.27 | -9.2 | SaulCentersPfdB | BFSpF | 18.75 - 2.0 | 3.00 | -8.6 | SelectQuote | SLQT | 0.34 - 1.3 | 4.15 | -3.8 | ServeRobotics | SERV | 3.89 - 10.0 | Stock | Sym | 52-Wk Hi/Lo | % Chg | SilexionTherap | SLXN | 0.18-17.0 | SimonPropPfdI | SPGpJ | 51.27 | ... | SmartLogisticsGb | SLGB | 0.25-3.9 | SmartTekm | SMTK | 1.03-7.4 | SmithDouglas | SMDC | 0.75-2.9 | Solomon | AXG | 0.07-0.8 | SoundHoundAI | SOUN | 4.96-7.8 | SouthernCrossRlith | SCATR | 0.14-10.0 | SportsEntGaming | SEEG | 1.52 | 2.7 | StandardLithium | SLI | 1.48 | -5.7 | StardustPower | SDST | 0.05-7.4 | StarlightersSpace | FET | 1.49 | -6.3 | Stereotaxis | STS | 1.08 | 2.7 | TetraTech | TEX | 1.46 | -4.7 | StructureTherap | GPCR | 23.89 | -6.4 | SunScoutA | SNSC | 0.94 | 0.5 | SunshineBio | SBFM | 0.28-10.6 | SurgePays | SURG | 0.12 | -8.3 | Sylvamo | SVLM | 30.40 | -4.6 | ADS-TEC Wt | ABSEW | 0.15 | ... | TMChemicals | TMCK | 2.87 | -14.2 | TMU Mobile206 | TTMUS | 20.63 | -9.6 | TPG Mtg PfdB | MITPb | 17.57 | -2.6 | TPG Mtg PfdA | MITPA | 18.52 | 0.8 | TPG RE Fin | TRTX | 5.78 | -0.7 | Tele&DataPfdUU | TDSpU | 19.05 | -1.4 | Fund | NAV | Net Chg | YTD % Ret | First Eagle Funds | GlbA | 87.30 | +0.25 | 8.5 | Franklin A1 | IncomeA1 | 2.51 | +0.01 | 5.0 | FrankTemp/Frank Adv | IncomeAdv | 2.48 | ... | 5.1 | FrankTemp/Franklin A | DynaTech A | 209.14 | -3.03 | 12.3 | Growth A | 149.51 | -0.30 | 11.0 | RisDv A | 97.38 | +0.37 | 8.1 | Guggenheim Funds Tru | TotRthBdRfCInst | NA | ... | NA | Harbor Funds | CapAplnst | 131.59 | -0.53 | 12.9 | JHF III DispVal | DispValMCI | 30.87 | +0.07 | 12.4 | John Hancock | BondR6 | 12.89 | ... | -2.6 | JPMorgan I Class | CoreBond | 9.84 | ... | -2.6 | EqInc | 28.59 | +0.15 | 16.7 | LgCpGwth | 87.43 | -0.46 | 6.9 | JPMorgan R Class | CoreBond | 9.86 | ... | -2.4 | CorePlusBd | 6.92 | ... | -1.7 | Lord Abbett I | ShtDurInc p | 3.78 | ... | 1.0 | Metropolitan West | TotRetBdl | NA | ... | NA | MFS Funds | IIE | 42.47 | +0.08 | 4.7 | MFS Funds Class I | Valuei | 54.20 | +0.36 | 9.0 | Natixis Funds | LSGrowthY | 34.13 | +0.10 | 2.7 | Fund | NAV | Net Chg | YTD %Ret | Northern Funds | Stkldx | 77.74 | -0.04 | 15.0 | Old Westbury Fds | LrgCpStr | NA | ... | NA | PGIM Funds CI Z | TotalReturnBond | 11.44 | ... | -2.4 | PIMCO Fds Instl | IntlBdUSD | NA | ... | NA | TotRt | NA | ... | NA | PIMCO Funds A | IncomeFd | NA | ... | NA | PIMCO Funds I2 | Income | NA | ... | NA | PIMCO Funds Instl | IncomeFd | NA | ... | NA | Price Funds | BlChip | 220.86 | -1.26 | 5.0 | LgCapGow I | 91.15 | -0.67 | 7.3 | Putnam Funds Class A | PutLargCap p | 45.55 | +0.23 | 16.5 | Putnam Funds Class Y | PutLargCap | 45.58 | +0.23 | 16.8 | Schwab Funds | 1000 Inv r | NA | ... | NA | FunUSLgInst r | NA | ... | NA | Intl Sel r | NA | ... | NA | S&P Sel | NA | ... | NA | TSM Sel r | NA | ... | NA | Strategic Adviser | StratAdCorInFnd | NA | ... | NA | StratAdFidCoreS | 8.78 | ... | -2.1 | StratAdFidEmr | 18.88 | -0.24 | 24.3 | StratAdFidUS | 22.23 | -0.02 | 17.3 | StratAdIntlFnd | NA | ... | NA | Stock | Sym | 52-Wk Hi/Lo | % Chg | Tele&DataPfdV | TDSpV | 17.40 | -1.3 | TempestTherap | TPST | 0.74 | -2.3 | TerralInnovatum | NKLR | 2.80 | -9.5 | TerrestrialEner | ITSR | 2.95 | -9.8 | TerrestrialEnerWt | IMSRW | 0.93 | -1.0 | ThorIndustries | THO | 62.83 | 0.1 | Tianclntl | CITI | 2.00 | -15.5 | TilrayBrands | TLRY | 3.34 | -5.1 | TokenCat | TC | 1.46 | -5.8 | TonixPharm | TNXP | 6.64 | -9.0 | TopWealth | TWG | 0.08 | -14.9 | TownsquareMedia | TSQ | 4.03 | -3.3 | TravisPharma | TRAV | 0.43 | -11.2 | TravisGlobal | TGL | 0.77 | -23.7 | TrilogyMetals | TMQ | 2.69 | -2.5 | TritonIntlPfdD | TRTNpD | 20.50 | -2.2 | TritonIntlPfdG | TRTNpG | 22.25 | -0.4 | Tucows | TCX | 8.45 | -7.2 | Turbogen | TRBG | 3.30 | -5.4 | 22ndCentury | XXII | 0.69 | -10.7 | UPF Inds | UFPI | 73.72 | 2.6 | UPF OilPfdB | UMBFQ | 18.70 | -5.7 | USGoldMining | USGO | 5.98 | -2.1 | uCloudlink | UCL | 0.24 | -3.8 | US Antimony | UAMY | 3.31 | -8.7 | UnumNts061558 | UNMA | 20.51 | 0.2 | Fund | NAV | Net Chg | YTD %Ret | StratAdMunBond | NA | ... | NA | StratAdvFidIntl | 16.04 | -0.04 | 8.6 | TIAA/CREF Funds | EqIdxInst | NA | ... | NA | IntlEqIdxInst | NA | ... | NA | LrgCpGrIdxInst | NA | ... | NA | VANGUARD ADMIRAL | 500Adml | 720.64 | -0.40 | 15.0 | BalAdml | 54.50 | -0.03 | 7.9 | CAITAdml | 10.94 | ... | -2.9 | CapOpAdml r | NA | ... | NA | DivAppldxAdml | 65.14 | +0.27 | 10.5 | EMAdmr | 49.60 | -0.18 | 11.5 | EqIncAdml | 101.35 | +0.40 | 10.9 | ExplrAdml | 120.17 | -1.20 | 12.6 | ExtndAdml | 177.10 | -1.22 | 12.5 | GroIncAdml | 123.69 | -0.16 | 13.4 | GrwthAdml | 282.98 | -1.10 | 13.0 | HltCareAdml r | 87.53 | +0.32 | 5.7 | HYCorAdml r | 5.29 | ... | -0.2 | InfProAd | 21.92 | +0.01 | -1.8 | InfTechldx | 518.13 | -6.00 | 34.7 | IntIGradml | 122.89 | -0.71 | 7.8 | ITBondAdml | 9.87 | ... | -3.3 | ITIGradeAdml | NA | ... | NA | LarCapAd | 181.29 | -0.11 | 15.0 | MidCpAdml | 400.93 | -1.03 | 12.7 | MuHYAdml | 9.94 | ... | -3.4 | MulntAdml | 13.05 | ... | -2.8 | MuLTAdml | 10.12 | ... | -3.8 | MuLtdAdml | 10.72 | +0.01 | -0.1 | MuShtAdml | 15.68 | ... | 1.1 | PrmpCapIndr | r230.80 | -1.83 | 24.8 | RealEstatAdml | 129.48 | +0.99 | 6.2 | SmCapAdml | 138.09 | -0.64 | 12.8 | Stock | Sym | 52-Wk Hi/Lo | % Chg | UpstreamBio | UPB | 4.12 | -11.3 | Ur-Energy | URG | 0.92 | -8.6 | UraniumEner | UEC | 8.81 | -3.9 | VcICGlobal | VCIG | 0.36 | -13.6 | VidaGlobal | VIDA | 1.27 | -11.4 | ValionBio | BVIO | 1.59 | -21.9 | VenHubGlobal | VHUB | 0.38 | -1.6 | Venu | VENU | 1.22 | -9.0 | Veritone | VERI | 0.53 | 9.6 | VerticalAerospace | EVTL | 0.49 | -6.2 | ViraxBotlabs | VRAX | 1.78 | -1.1 | VirtusCVPdA | KCNpA | 18.52 | -0.4 | Viviva | VIVVA | 2.14 | -1.3 | VividSeats | SEAT | 2.84 | -11.5 | VividSeatsWt | SEATW | 0.01 | 6.7 | VoltitionRX | VNRX | 0.20 | -3.9 | VoyagerTherap | VYGR | 2.25 | -7.3 | WaveLifeSci | WVE | 3.27 | -5.2 | WaFdPrdA | WAFDP | 14.97 | -1.1 | Walker&Dunlop | WD | 32.08 | -2.2 | Watsco B | WSOB | 285.84 | -7.5 | Wakechange | WKT | 0.65 | -7.9 | WellsFargoPfdAY | WFcPf | 19.64 | -1.3 | WellsFargoPfdAZ | WFcGZ | 16.60 | -0.7 | WellsFargoPfdAA | WFcPA | 16.45 | -0.6 | WestEnclaveRt | WENrC | 0.08 | -19.8 | 52-Wk % Hi/Lo Chg | Stock | Sym | 52-Wk % Hi/Lo Chg | 4.12 | -11.3 | WetourRobotics | WETO | 0.98 | -3.8 | 0.92 | -8.6 | WheelerREIT | WHLR | 0.46 | -19.9 | 8.81 | -3.9 | Whirlpool | WHR | 28.18 | 0.2 | 0.36 | -13.6 | WhirlpoolPfdA | WHRpA | 27.01 | -0.1 | 1.27 | -10.9 | WMiHiologram | WIMI | 0.60 | -6.6 | 1.59 | -21.5 | Winnebago | WGO | 22.93 | -0.8 | 0.38 | -1.6 | WiseQey | WQEY | 7.91 | 1.9 | 1.22 | -9.0 | WynnResorts | WYNN | 73.08 | -0.3 | 0.53 | 9.6 | XCHG | XCH | 2.20 | -20.4 | 0.49 | -6.2 | X-Energy | XE | 13.66 | -4.6 | 1.78 | -1.1 | XTL Biopharm | XTLB | 1.92 | -3.0 | XanadaQuantum | XNDU | 3.45 | -10.5 | 18.52 | -0.4 | XcelBrands | XELB | 0.37 | -24.3 | 2.14 | -42.9 | Xper | XPER | 4.97 | -4.4 | 2.84 | -11.5 | XtendAllRobotics | XTND | 2.24 | -10.2 | 0.01 | 6.7 | Yimutian | YMT | 0.86 | -9.8 | 0.20 | -2.0 | YirenDigitala | YRD | 0.52 | -44.0 | 2.25 | -7.3 | YorkSpace | YSS | 6.67 | -3.9 | 3.27 | -5.2 | YorkvillentiCapWt | YCCW | 0.34 | -5.5 | 14.97 | -1.1 | YYForce | YYFOR | 0.87 | -11.1 | 32.08 | -2.2 | ZMH | ZMH | 1.90 | -5.9 | 285.84 | -7.5 | ZenaTech | ZENA | 0.95 | -1.8 | 0.65 | -28.3 | ZeppHealth | ZEPP | 3.59 | -3.0 | 19.64 | -1.1 | ZetaNetwork | ZNB | 0.81 | 8.6 | 16.60 | -0.7 | ZhibaTech | ZBAO | 2.19 | -16.4 | 16.45 | -0.6 | Zhongchao | ZCMD | 1.35 | -12.6 | 0.08 | -19.8 | ZoneFrontierB | ZONE | 0.11 | -10.2 | Fund | NAV | Net Chg | YTD %Ret | SmGthAdml | 119.81 | -1.42 | 13.2 | STIGradeAdml | NA | ... | NA | STIPSlxAdm | 24.32 | +0.02 | 1.4 | TotBdAdml | 9.24 | ... | -2.4 | TotIntBldxAdm | 18.78 | ... | -0.9 | TotIntlAdmlx r | 45.26 | -0.22 | 12.5 | TotStAdml | 185.72 | -0.21 | 14.8 | TxMCapAdml | 400.50 | -0.39 | 14.7 | TxMln r | 22.43 | -0.12 | 12.8 | USGroAdml | 206.44 | -1.03 | 5.8 | ValAdml | 86.38 | +0.34 | 17.7 | WdsrlAdml | 93.12 | +0.51 | 12.5 | WellsIAdml | NA | ... | NA | WelltnAdml | 81.77 | +0.01 | 7.7 | WndsrAdml | 83.44 | +0.21 | 13.6 | VANGUARD FDS | DivdGro | 32.38 | +0.16 | 6.6 | FTAIWldnAdml | 51.16 | -0.25 | 12.8 | LifeGro | NA | ... | NA | LifeMod | NA | ... | NA | PrmpcCor | 46.60 | -0.35 | 25.8 | STAR | NA | ... | NA | TgtRe2020 | NA | ... | NA | TgtRe2025 | NA | ... | NA | TgtRe2030 | NA | ... | NA | TgtRe2035 | NA | ... | NA | TgtRe2040 | NA | ... | NA | TgtRe2045 | NA | ... | NA | TgtRe2050 | NA | ... | NA | TgtRet2055 | NA | ... | NA | TgtRetInc | NA | ... | NA | Welltn | 47.36 | +0.01 | 7.6 | VANGUARD INDEX FDS | D et | Fund | NAV | Net Chg | YTD %Ret | .2 | ExtndInstPI | 437.01 | -3.01 | 12.5 | A | IdxIntl | 27.06 | -0.13 | 12.4 | M | MdCpGrAdml128.61 | -1.61 | 7.5 | M | MdCpVIAdml105.26 | +0.49 | 16.4 | M | SmValAdml | 100.81 | +0.10 | 12.4 | .5 | TotBd2 | 9.11 | ... | -2.4 | .8 | TotIntlInstldx | 181.00 | -0.88 | 12.5 | .7 | TottlInstPIld | 181.04 | -0.89 | 12.5 | .8 | TotSt | 185.68 | -0.21 | 14.7 | W | VANGUARD INSTL FDS | .7 | DevMktSindInst | 22.46 | -0.12 | 12.9 | .6 | DevMktSxlnst | 35.10 | -0.19 | 12.8 | .2 | ExtndInst | 177.08 | -1.22 | 12.5 | .7 | FTScinst | NA | ... | NA | .6 | GrwthInst | 282.99 | -1.11 | 13.0 | .6 | InPrSeln | 8.93 | +0.01 | -1.8 | .6 | Instldx | 625.10 | -0.34 | 15.1 | .8 | InstPlus | 625.09 | -0.34 | 15.1 | .8 | InstSTStPlus | 127.99 | -0.14 | 14.8 | .7 | MidCplnst | 88.57 | -0.23 | 12.8 | .7 | MidCplstPI | 436.80 | -1.12 | 12.8 | .8 | MompStrTtlStk | 348.43 | -0.40 | 14.8 | .8 | MmpStrTtlStk | 365.71 | -0.42 | 14.8 | .8 | SmCapInst | 138.08 | -0.64 | 12.8 | .8 | SmCapInstPI | 398.56 | -1.85 | 12.8 | .8 | STIGradelnst | NA | ... | NA | .7 | STIPSlxins | 24.34 | +0.02 | 1.4 | .7 | TotBdInst | 9.25 | +0.01 | -2.3 | .7 | TotBdInst2 | 9.11 | ... | -2.4 | .7 | TotBdInstPI | 9.24 | ... | -2.4 | .7 | TotIntBdldxinst | 28.19 | +0.01 | -0.9 | .7 | TotStInst | 185.74 | -0.21 | 14.8 | .7 | ValueInst | 86.38 | +0.34 | 17.7 | WCM Focus Funds | WCMScrtintGwlns | 27.44 | -0.01 | 10.3 | # WSJ — CMO Council

THE WSJ CMO COUNCIL SUMMIT

November 17-18, 2026 | New York, NY

Meet the industry leaders joining to shape the conversation on building influence and driving business forward.

FEATURING:

Ndidi Oteh

CEO

Accenture Song

Jonathan Adashek

SVP and Chief Global Affairs Officer

IBM

Mark Kirkham

CMO

PepsiCo U.S. Beverages

Presenting Sponsors:

Oshiya Savur

CMO

e.l.f. Beauty

Gülen Bengi

Lead Global CMO, Mars Inc.

Global Chief Growth Officer,

Mars Snacking

Sophie Goldschmidt

President and CEO

United States Ski

and Snowboard Association

Jennifer Temple

EVP and Chief Marketing

and Communications Officer

HPE

Rachel Epstein

National Women's Soccer League (NWSL)

Adobe Deloitte.

Frank Cooper III

CMO

Visa

Contributing Sponsor:

Request an Invitation: Email CMOCouncil@wsj.com or scan the QR code.

Airbnb Could Still Prevail Over AI Threat

For the lodging platform's stock to thrive in the age of bots, it has to turn repeat customers into loyal ones

Sept. 2026

CEO Brian Chesky at an Airbnb event in San Francisco earlier this year.

AI agents like Muse can already find you the cheapest hotel room in Paris. But they can't locate a cheaper version of that Catskills cabin you've been eyeing, because it might only be available on Airbnb.

Investors should pay attention to that distinction. When Meta Platforms launched its Muse agent last month, travel stocks including Booking Holdings, Expedia and Airbnb all fell sharply.

Airbnb, though, has a real chance to emerge as a winner from the upheaval. The catch: Its stock already reflects above-industry growth. To justify its valuation, Airbnb will need to turn repeat customers into loyal ones.

Online travel companies make much of their money by simplifying search and collecting fees on bookings. AI agents threaten that model.

But not all travel marketplaces are equally exposed. Booking and Expedia largely sell hotel rooms that travelers can also book directly or through competing sites. If an agent can find the same room elsewhere, it has little reason to favor either Booking or Expedia.

Booking and Expedia also sell sponsored listings that steer travelers toward particular properties. Wells Fargo estimates those will account for about $8\%$ of Expedia's revenue and a much higher percentage of profit next year.

Airbnb has more ways to adapt. More than half its listings are available only on its platform, and more than 90% of its traffic comes directly to its app or website.

The customer relationship doesn't end after booking, either. Bernstein analyst Richard Clarke notes that $90\%$ of Airbnb guests go on to message their hosts about arrival times, keys or local taxes, giving Airbnb a connection to both sides of the transaction.

---

Airbnb's growth seems to be accelerating this year.

Source: FactSet

How the companies have responded to the possible agentic future is telling.

Expedia quickly signed on as a Muse partner. Airbnb hasn't, and Chief Executive Brian Chesky says AI chatbots have so far been a boon, sending customers to Airbnb's website.

Chatbots might work for buying paper towels, he quipped at a Skift

conference last month, but people enjoy planning trips. He argued that browsing dozens of homes isn't something a text-based chatbot is well suited for.

Still, the AI jitters arrived just as Airbnb was persuading investors it de-

served its pricey multiple. For years after its 2020 initial public offering, the stock—which trades around 25 to 30 times forward earnings—went nowhere. Investors saw a mature operator trading at a growth premium.

This year, Airbnb growth seems to be accelerating. The stock jumped in August after the company raised its full-year revenue-growth guidance with its second-quarter results. Wells Fargo

analyst Ken Gawrelski credits a run of product improvements under a revamped leadership team.

Among the changes: letting guests reserve now and pay later, adding hotels, and a redesigned home page and app. Investors were also betting on what comes next, including thousands more hotels, car rentals and, eventually, advertising.

The irony is that some of those growth drivers push Airbnb closer to the kind of business Booking and Expedia run—the kind of business AI agents could threaten. Even if AI agents capture a large share of travel planning and booking, Airbnb would capture the demand. But it and others would slowly lose control over how customers find and choose properties.

That would undermine the advertising opportunity investors are counting on. The bigger point for Airbnb and other marketplaces is that losing control of customer acquisition could mean surrendering some of their pricing power and margins.

To bulletproof itself, Airbnb might look to another e-commerce giant that has so far kept AI agents at arm's length: Amazon.

Like Amazon, Airbnb has a loyal customer base and hard-to-match supply. But it has nothing like Prime membership to make customers think twice before taking their business elsewhere.

That is where loyalty comes in. Business travelers stick with Hilton or Marriott because enough nights earn them perks. Leisure travelers rarely accumulate stays with one chain. Airbnb has millions of listings and plenty of repeat customers, but no broad rewards program. It has begun experimenting with credits on hotel stays, but it should make loyalty a priority, not just a promotion.

Airbnb also plans to launch its own AI agent next year. But travelers using an agent might still want it to search Airbnb, Vrbo, Booking and hotel websites alike, rather than limit itself to one company's inventory.

Eventually, Airbnb might have to strike deals with agent makers, using its unique homes as leverage to negotiate favorable terms, says Gawrelski.

Such deals, along with rewards for loyal guests, could over the long term eat into the company's roughly $13\%$ take rate, he adds. But if they bring in enough additional bookings, the trade-off could be worthwhile.

History offers a reason not to panic. The shift from desktop to mobile unsettled investors in Alphabet and Amazon, but both emerged as major beneficiaries. Companies with valuable assets can come out of a platform shift stronger, if they adapt quickly enough.

Airbnb has homes the bots can't easily replace. Now it needs to give guests a reason to insist on booking them there.

—David Wainer

When to Worry About Narrow Stock-Market Rallies

Excess return of normal S&P 500 vs. S&P 500 Equal Weight Index since...

...ChatGPT release through today

...Yahoo IPO to Tech bubble peak

Note: Yahoo's IPO was on April 12, 1996; ChatGPT's release date was 1,409 days ago

Source: FactSet

Stocks are near a record, but lots of them are in the doghouse, too. It's the investing edition of "two things can be true at once."

Only one-third of stocks in the S&P 500 index were trading above their 50-day moving average as of Friday, even as the benchmark flirted with a record. You might have heard about that narrow leadership—“bad breadth,” as the overused gag goes.

Many pundits say that's a problem, but it's complicated. Short-term breadth readings only occasionally signal a pullback, and usually just a minor one.

It's also the history of markets in a nutshell. Diversified investors own hundreds of companies, yet most stocks don't earn investors money in the long run. A small minority have produced half of the

historical gain over the past century.

Sometimes, though, narrow market action really precedes a major cyclical turning point. It happens when ear

happens when certain stocks get big and then produce an outsize share of market gains over a short time span, powering the index higher on their own.

amount of every stock with the standard index that holds them in proportion to their market value.

The equal-weighted version of the S&P 500 has been trounced by

---

Short-term breadth readings only occasionally signal a pullback.

the widely followed capitalization-weighted version for years now. That went into overdrive when ChatGPT was released in November 2022 and AI became the only

game in town.

When one group of large companies opens up a big gap in just a handful of years, it precedes an even faster reckoning, and usually a bear market. Great technological advancements don't change that. The pattern held for radio,

the Nifty Fifty and dot-coms, and this time probably isn't different.

Since ChatGPT's unveiling, the capitalization-weighted S&P 500 has earned nearly 50 percentage points more of total return than the equal-weighted one. To pick a historically similar moment to ChatGPT, the S&P 500 was beating its equal-weighted twin by an almost identical amount the same number of trading days after Yahoo's 1996 initial public offering.

Maybe the equal-weighted index is just worse? Nope.

It has beaten the S&P 500 since 1990. That is no accident because keeping an equal weighting forces an index to favor smaller, cheaper stocks—two factors known to boost long-run returns.

The more interesting point is when an equal-weight index wins. Like a rubber band stretched tight, it catches up a lot more quickly—and painfully—than it took to pull it into that shape.

-Spencer Jakab

MONEY & INVESTING

Fund flows to U.S. stocks, monthly

Source: EPFR

---

Stock Spotlight

---

Chipotle

Shares declined 3.8% on reports that Starbucks dismissed speculation it might try to purchase the burrito chain.

---

IREN

Shares of the cloud-computing company edged 1.1% lower after a report by the Information that it has struck a deal with Anthropic.

Shares of the data-center company soared 16% after it said it raised about \$900 million to upgrade the company's assets, which include FTX's old bitcoin-mining business.

Valero and Marathon Petroleum

Shares of U.S. oil-refining\*

groups edged up as investors weigh the impact of U.S. moves to boost diesel supplies.

Volkswagen

The German automaker said deliveries declined in the third quarter as the company continued to suffer from a deteriorating market in China. Shares edged higher by less than 0.1%.

---

In Market History

APIC/GETTY IMAGES

On this day in 1971, Intel went public.

---

TUESDAY'S EVENTS:

◆ Federal Reserve speakers: Fed governor Christopher Waller at the Bloomberg New Economy Forum in New Delhi.

◆ Economic data: Existing-home sales for the month of September, ADP employment data, September Treasury budget, and Johnson Redbook retail sales index

---

EARNINGS EXPECTED:

JPMorgan Chase

Johnson & Johnson

UnitedHealth

Goldman Sachs

Wells Fargo

Citigroup

Domino's Pizza

---

U.S. Stock Funds' Inflows Hit Fever Pitch

Investors are piling into U.S. stock funds at a pace rarely seen in market history.

U.S. stock funds have drawn 13 consecutive months of inflows, the longest streak in EPFR data going back to 2000.

—Gunjan Banerji

---

Salesforce Stock Upgrade

Shares of Salesforce rose 2.1% after Bank of America issued a vote of confidence in the stock, citing its artificial-intelligence strategy.

The bank upgraded the stock to "buy" from "underperform" and raised its target price to \$285 from \$160.

While there have been concerns that AI could render traditional enterprise software companies obsolete, BofA analysts noted that large corporations are unlikely to replace platforms that house their business logic, data, workflows and compliance frameworks. The upgrade was further supported by Salesforce's strong free cash flow and expected accelerating revenue growth.

—Vicky Ge Huang

🔥 一、正在进行的文化现象与时代切片 (Story & Mindset Deep-Dive)
🔥 要闻

《绝命毒师》明星 RJ Mitte 逝世,享年 34 岁

📰 报刊故事还原:当局及其代表表示,《绝命毒师》(Breaking Bad)演员兼残疾权利倡导者 RJ Mitte 周一去世,享年 34 岁。

💡 驻外文化与社会背景解码:
该报道刊发于《The Wall Street Journal》要闻版面,折射出当地社会在日常生活与观念层面的真实关注点。
🔥 要闻

纽约 演员在飞机事件后被拘留

📰 报刊故事还原:当局表示,演员塞尔玛·布莱尔(Selma Blair)在从洛杉矶飞往纽约的航班上因肢体暴力并导致两名乘务员受伤而被拘留。54 岁的布莱尔于周日晚上在纽约肯尼迪(JFK)机场被拘留。布莱尔的一名代表在声明中表示,她发生了医疗紧急情况,导致了所

💡 驻外文化与社会背景解码:
该报道刊发于《The Wall Street Journal》要闻版面,折射出当地社会在日常生活与观念层面的真实关注点。
🔥 要闻

作者:Brian Schwartz, Annie Linskey 和 Theo Francis

📰 报刊故事还原:这些捐赠者的身份并未包含在国家广场信托基金(Trust for the National Mall)的公开申报文件中。该信托基金是一家历史悠久的非营利组织,白宫此前也利用该组织管理为凯旋门和玫瑰园筹集的资金。每位捐赠者的捐款金额在 1000

💡 驻外文化与社会背景解码:
该报道刊发于《The Wall Street Journal》要闻版面,折射出当地社会在日常生活与观念层面的真实关注点。
🏛️ 二、本期所在国制度、机构与历史百科 (Local Encyclopedia)
美国宪政与司法潜规则

⚖️ 美国司法部『大选前 60 天静默期惯例』(DOJ 60-Day Rule)

美国司法部(DOJ)与联邦调查局(FBI)长期遵循一项非正式制度默契:在距离全国大选投票日不到 60 天时,避免对参选政客或现任议员采取公开搜查住所、高调起诉等行动,以防执法机构被指责干预选举结果。此次选前数周突袭众议员奥马尔住所打破了这一惯例,因而引发两党关于『司法武器化』的激烈冲突。

宏观经济与美国社会分层

📈 霍尔『消费预期模型』与美国 20% 月光家庭困境

2026 诺贝尔经济学奖得主罗伯特·霍尔(Robert E. Hall)与迈克尔·伍德福德揭示了现代消费的核心规律:约 80% 拥有资产的家庭根据『对未来长期收入的预期』平稳消费;而底层 20% 缺乏储蓄的『月光家庭(Hand-to-mouth)』则完全受制于当期账单,解释了为何高通胀下美国会出现一边高端消费旺盛、一边底层生存焦虑的 K 型分化。

拉美宪政与选举极化

⚖️ 巴西最高选举法院 (TSE) 与数字言论监管

巴西 TSE 拥有对大选期间虚假信息与数字渠道的强制关停权。TSE 封禁亲卢拉社交频道事件折射出司法权在极化选举中裁量权边界的巨大争议。

🎨 三、副刊拾遗:文艺、书评、电影与科学新知 (Arts & Science Salon)
🎨 要闻

《绝命毒师》明星 RJ Mitte 逝世,享年 34 岁

当局及其代表表示,《绝命毒师》(Breaking Bad)演员兼残疾权利倡导者 RJ Mitte 周一去世,享年 34 岁。

🎨 要闻

纽约 演员在飞机事件后被拘留

当局表示,演员塞尔玛·布莱尔(Selma Blair)在从洛杉矶飞往纽约的航班上因肢体暴力并导致两名乘务员受伤而被拘留。54 岁的布莱尔于周日晚上在纽约肯尼迪(JFK)机场被拘留。布莱尔的一名代表在声明中表示,她发生了医疗紧急情况,导致了所

🎨 要闻

作者:Brian Schwartz, Annie Linskey 和 Theo Francis

这些捐赠者的身份并未包含在国家广场信托基金(Trust for the National Mall)的公开申报文件中。该信托基金是一家历史悠久的非营利组织,白宫此前也利用该组织管理为凯旋门和玫瑰园筹集的资金。每位捐赠者的捐款金额在 1000

🎨 要闻

作者:George Popstefanov,PMG 创始人兼首席执行官

AI 加速了分析,自动化了任务,并产生了任何组织都无法完全吸收的产出。客户信号实时更新。媒体每小时都在碎片化。商业、文化和技术的演进速度,已经超过了旨在管理它们的运营模式。

🎨 要闻

罗素·布兰德强奸案审判开始

英国喜剧演员兼演员罗素·布兰德(Russell Brand)周一出现在伦敦的一家法院,开始接受强奸和性侵指控的审判。

🎨 要闻

艺术评论

电影评论 / 凯尔·史密斯 (KYLE SMITH)

🎨 要闻

标准收藏公司集结这位大师导演的全部电影

他的命令来自肖尼土地与牲畜公司(Shawnee Land and Cattle Co.)。那么,用散弹枪瞄准其总裁,或许可行?不,我们被告知,那位高管只是在试图满足银行的要求。也许去图尔萨枪杀一名银行家?我们得知,“他不过是个经理”,又一个

🎨 要闻

10月13日当周活动指南

由《华尔街日报》艺术评论编辑部提供

🎨 要闻

许可改革法案损害历史保护

如果许可改革如贵报社论所建议的那样通过(见10月6日《许可改革终于实现了,真的吗?》),它将象征着目前华盛顿正在形成的一种更大且令人不安的趋势——即公共政策和联邦行动缺乏清晰的流程、缺乏有意义的公众和利益相关者参与,且缺乏正确的判断。特别是

🎨 要闻

Chipotle

由于有报道称星巴克否认了可能尝试收购这家卷饼连锁店的猜测,其股价下跌3.8%。

🎨 要闻

市场历史回顾

APIC / GETTY IMAGES

🎨 要闻

美国股票基金流入量达到狂热状态

投资者涌入美国股票基金的速度在市场历史上极为罕见。

⚙️ 解析引擎:mineru-vlm (V4.2 AST-Healed & Stitched) · 全版面 100% 完备提取 · 图片与专有缩写已通过 AST 校验